Optimal treatment of multiple ipsilateral primary breast cancers

INTRODUCTION: The success of breast-conservation therapy (BCT) for patients with multiple ipsilateral invasive breast cancers (MIBC) is sparsely documented. METHODS: A retrospective review of single-institution experience. Patients with 2 or more invasive cancers separated by normal breast tissue were included; patients with 1 invasive cancer with additional in situ lesions and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients were treated over 19 years. Fifty-eight (39%) patients underwent BCT. Preoperatively, multiple tumors were suspected in more mastectomy patients than BCT patients (75% versus 62%). Most patients had 2 tumors and 1 histology. Fifty-five percent of patients with tumors within 1 quadrant underwent BCT versus 10% of patients with tumors in more than 1 quadrant. One hundred eight patients underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Twenty-seven percent (34) were SLN positive. There were no regional recurrences among the SLN-negative patients. Six patients recurred: 1 nodal, 1 local, and 4 distant. The locoregional BCT recurrence rate was 3.4%. DISCUSSION: MIBC patients can safely undergo BCT with low recurrence risk. SLNB can be performed with minimal risk of regional recurrence.     

Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy

BACKGROUND: Frozen-section analysis (FS) of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is performed to avoid reoperation for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), but it can miss micrometastatic disease, is labor intensive for the pathologist, and does not alter the number of breast-conservation therapy (BCT) patients needing reoperation for positive margins. The purpose of this study was to determine if eliminating FS would change reoperation rates in BCT patients. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 2004 and December 2005, 1,218 patients had simultaneous BCT and SLN biopsy for invasive breast cancer. FS of the SLN was used selectively at the surgeon's discretion. Clinical and pathologic data were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 542 of 1,218 (44%) patients had positive margins. FS of the SLN was performed in 931 of 1,218 (76%) patients. In those having FS, the SLN positivity rate was 33% (306 of 931). FS identified the positive SLN in 170 of 306 (56%) patients with positive nodes, allowing for immediate ALND. But 101 of these 170 patients had positive lumpectomy margins; and FS of the SLN saved 69 of 931 (7%) patients a second operation. Of patients not having FS, 48 of 287 (17%) had a positive SLN on final pathology. Only 18 of 48 (those seen on routine hematoxylin and eosin) might have been seen on FS, potentially sparing reoperation. Half of patients not having FS required reexcision for positive margins. FS would have spared reoperation for only 8 of 287 (3%) patients in this group. Overall, of 354 of 1,218 patients with SLN metastases, 170 had immediate ALND and 98 had delayed ALND. Of those having delayed ALND, 68 of 98 also had positive margins. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients having BCT with SLN biopsy, FS identified the positive SLN in 56% of patients with positive SLNs, allowing immediate ALND, and was false negative in 44%. Margin status remains a frequent indication for reoperation in BCT; routine FS analysis of the SLN ultimately saves only a minority of patients a second operation.     

Management of the Axilla in T1-2 Breast Cancer Patients with Macrometastatic Sentinel Node Involvement Who Underwent Breast-Conserving Therapy

Purpose: The aims of our study were to determine the incidence of axillary recurrence and arm morbidity in T1-2 invasive breast cancer patients with macrometastases on the sentinel lymph node (SLN) who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT), with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods: One hundred and nine T1-2 invasive breast cancer patients with macrometastases on the SLN who underwent BCT in our institution were included in the study. Patients with 1–2 positive SLN and without extra nodal extension (ENE) on the SLN did not undergo ALND (SLN-only group) and patients with ENE or patients who had >2 metastatic nodes underwent level I, II ALND (ALND group). The SLN-only group received radiotherapy to three axillary levels, the supraclavicular fossa, and ± mammaria interna. ALND group received radiotherapy to axillary level III, the supraclavicular fossa, and ± mammaria interna. The incidence of axillary recurrence and arm morbidity were investigated. Results: Of the 109 patients, 18 patients with >2 metastatic SLNs and 10 with ENE on the SLN underwent ALND and 81 patients underwent SLN only. Median follow-up time was 37 months (3–77). There was no axillary recurrence in SLN-only group. However, in the ALND group 1 patient had developed axillary metastasis. There were 2 objective lymphoedema and 3 arm-shoulder restriction cases in the SLN-only group, and 2 and 3 in the ALND group, respectively. Conclusions: Axillary dissection could safely be omitted in patients with 1–2 macrometastatic SLN and without ENE who undergo BCT and axillary radiotherapy.     

Avoiding Axillary Treatment in Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastases of Breast Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of Axillary or Distant Recurrence

Background

The need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) micrometastases remains controversial. The aims of the study were to evaluate the locoregional failure and outcome of breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastases who did not undergo completion ALND.

Methods

Between November 2000 and December 2006, SLN biopsy was successfully performed in 1178 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Only patients with macrometastasis (>2 mm) underwent ALND, while patients with negative SLN or micrometastases did not undergo further treatment of the axilla, by either surgery or radiotherapy. Regarding adjuvant therapy decision, patients with SLN-micrometastases (pN1_mi) were considered as node-positive patients.

Results

Of 1,178 patients, 59 (5%) had micrometastases. Of those with micrometastases, 14 (24%) underwent ALND because the intraoperative study of the SLN yielded a positive result. With a median follow-up of 60 (range, 8–94) months, none of the patients with SLN micrometastases in whom ALND was omitted developed an axillary recurrence, while one patient in whom ALND was performed developed infraclavicular lymph node recurrence. One patient, who declined postoperative breast irradiation, developed breast recurrence and distant metastasis.

Conclusions

Breast cancer patients with SLN micrometastases in whom ALND was omitted had a very low locoregional failure rate. This study supports the theory that ALND might be avoided in these patients, providing that adjuvant systemic treatment equal to treatment provided to treat node-positive disease is administered. However, longer follow-up and results of additional prospective studies are needed.     

Twenty‐five years of change in the management of the axilla in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is now used worldwide. It has led to many changes in how we manage the axilla in patients with breast cancer. This review covers four areas of management of the axilla in breast cancer: assessing the clinically node‐negative axilla, managing the clinically negative axilla found to be involved at SLN biopsy, management of the clinically positive axilla in the context of neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment of the diseased axilla when radical therapy is required. We suggest that the evidence supports an optimum number of 3 nodes to be removed for accurate SLN biopsy. Breast cancer departments that have not adopted Z0011 patient management cannot continue to avoid change. The evidence is clear: Not all patients with limited axillary nodal disease on sentinel node biopsy need axillary lymph node dissection. For patients who do need axillary treatment, axillary radiotherapy continues to be under‐used. Patients undergoing neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy can be safely assessed by post‐therapy SLN biopsy, with retrieval of any previously biopsied involved nodes by targeted axillary dissection. There is much to support the trend to doing less in the axilla. We are obliged to act based on the available robust clinical trial data in a way that limits morbidity while at the same time does not increase the risk of disease recurrence.     

Prognostic factors in node negative premenopausal women treated with breast conserving therapy without adjuvant systemic therapy

PURPOSE: To study the prognostic factors in node negative premenopausal women treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT) without any adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS: Of the 1022 women treated with BCT at Tata Memorial Hospital, there was a cohort of 175 women who were premenopausal, node negative and had not received any adjuvant systemic therapy. BCT consisted of wide excision, complete axillary clearance, whole breast radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) with 6 MV photons plus tumour bed boost either with brachytherapy or electrons. RESULTS: The median age at presentation was 38 years (range 22-51 years) and the median pathological tumour size was 3 cm (1-5 cm). The 5-year actuarial local control rate was 89.5% and the overall survival (OS) was 88%. On univariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was the only prognostic factor affecting all failures and disease-free survival. The 5-year local control rate in absence of LVI was 93.5% in contrast to 76.5% (p=0.0098) when LVI was present. Similarly, the OS in absence of LVI was 91% in contrast to 74% in presence of LVI (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, LVI was the independent prognostic factor affecting the disease-free survival (p=0.001; 95% CI: 1.46-4.96). CONCLUSION: LVI emerged as the most important prognostic factor for node negative premenopausal women not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. There is a need to take into consideration the presence of LVI while deciding adjuvant systemic therapy in T1N0 patients.     

The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in elderly breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Although sentinel lymph node biopsy has been accepted as a useful procedure for certain breast cancer patients, the value of this procedure in the elderly remains unknown. We undertook this study to evaluate changes in adjuvant treatment attributable to sentinel lymph node biopsy. METHODS: A total of 104 patients > or =65 years underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy plus lumpectomy or mastectomy for the treatment of clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer. Demographic, pathologic, and treatment data were evaluated using an SAS software package (SAS, Cary, North Carolina). RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 104 patients (28%) had metastatic disease in > or =1 sentinel lymph node. Nonsurgical treatment was modified in 38% of patients because of sentinel lymph node biopsy results. Changes included adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, adjuvant axillary radiotherapy, and decisions against adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy in elderly breast cancer patients is beneficial.     

Is breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping valuable for patients in their seventies and beyond?

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is performed less commonly for the axillary staging of elderly patients because it is felt to uncommonly alter therapy. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection can accomplish axillary staging with less morbidity, but it is unclear if it alters subsequent therapy. METHODS: Review of a prospectively collected breast cancer SLN mapping database. Medical records were reviewed to supplement the database. RESULTS: Among 730 breast cancer SLN mapping patients, 261 (35.8%) were >or=70 years of age (range 70 to 95). The overall SLN identification rate was 98.8% among those <70 and 97.1% for those >or=70 (P=.11) and 100% and 99.4%, respectively (P=.25), among the most recent 500 patients. SLN metastases were detected by hematoxalin and eosin staining (H&E) in 24.2% of those <70 and 13.4% of those >/=70 (P<.01) and by immunohistochemistry staining (IHC) only in 4.6% and 5.0% of patients, respectively. No elderly patients with histologically negative SLNs underwent ALND, but 88.9% of patients with H&E metastases and 84.6% with IHC metastases underwent ALND. Of the H&E-positive women, 88% underwent adjuvant systemic therapy versus 55% of H&E-negative women (P<.01). Hormonal therapy was administered to 86.9% of SLN-positive women and 54.3% of SLN-negative women (P<.01) and cytotoxic chemotherapy was administered to 24% of SLN-positive patients versus 2.8% of SLN-negative patients (P<.01). SLN status was associated with significantly different rates of systemic therapy for patients with tumors <1 cm and 1 to 2 cm, but not with tumors >2 cm. Mean follow-up was 15.4 months. No patient experienced local or regional recurrence. Distant metastases occurred in 8.2% of patients with SLN metastases and in no patients with negative SLNs (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of SLN mapping and biopsy in elderly patients significantly influences subsequent therapy decisions, including ALND, hormonal therapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. SLN biopsy should be recommended to elderly breast cancer patients.     

临床腋淋巴结阴性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结研究

目的：探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（ｓｅｎｔｉｎｅｌ ｌｙｍｐｈ ｎｏｄｅ ｂｉｏｐｓｙ, ＳＬＮＢ）在乳腺癌治疗中的应用。方法：使用专利蓝和美蓝染色,对１９９９年９月～２００１年４月连续收治的１４５例临床查体腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌病人行前哨淋巴结活检术。结果：ＳＬＮＢ成功率为９６．５％（１４０／１４５）,假阴性率为２３．５％,准确率为９１．４％。病人年龄、肿瘤最大径、肿瘤部位、注射染料类型及是否活检对成功率和假阴性率无影响。结论：ＳＬＮＢ能够准确预测腋窝淋巴结的转移状况,在缩小手术范围、减少术后并发症的同时,提高了腋窝淋巴结分期的准确性;美蓝与专利蓝均可成功确定ＳＬＮ。     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Previous Ipsilateral Complete Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background

Prior ipsilateral completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) may be considered a contraindication to performing a sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in a patient with recurrent breast carcinoma. However, reoperative SLN biopsy following axillary dissection would determine if alternative lymphatic drainage pathways exist. If nodes were found to contain metastatic disease, staging and locoregional control of the disease could be affected.

Materials and Methods

An institutional breast cancer database and electronic health record (IRB No. 102554) prospectively accrued 6225 patients between 1994 and 2007. Under separate IRB approval (IRB No. 102552), this database was queried for patients with a prior history of CALND who received a SLN biopsy. Patients’ demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were recorded.

Results

Of the 6225 patients, 45 (0.7%) were identified as having previously undergone breast-conservation surgery, CALND, and ipsilateral reoperative SLN mapping and biopsy. Of the 45 patients, 13 (29%) had a successful ipsilateral reoperative SLN mapping and biopsy. Nonaxillary drainage was identified in 5 patients with reoperative SLN biopsy.

Conclusion

Reoperative SLN mapping and biopsy is feasible in the setting of local recurrence after previous CALND. This procedure performed for breast cancer recurrence provides important staging information while identifying extra-axillary drainage that could affect both staging and local control.     

Does the Method of Biopsy Affect the Incidence of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases?

More detailed examination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer has raised concerns about the clinical significance of micrometastases, specifically isolated tumor cells detected only through immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. It has been suggested that these cells do not carry the same biologic implications as true metastatic foci and may represent artifact. A retrospective institutional review board-approved review was conducted on clinically node-negative breast cancer patients who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) between 1997 and 2003. Retrospective analysis of tumor characteristics and the method of the initial diagnostic biopsy were correlated with the presence and nature of metastatic disease in the SLN. Of 537 SLNBs, 123 (23%) were hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) positive. SLN positivity strongly correlated with tumor size (p<0.001) and tumor grade (p=0.025), but not with the method of biopsy (needle versus excisional biopsy). Prior to July 2002, we routinely evaluated H&E-negative SLNs with IHC (n=381). Of the 291 H&E-negative patients, 26 had IHC-only detected micrometastases (9%). The likelihood of detecting IHC-only metastases did not correlate with tumor size or grade, but was significantly higher in patients undergoing excisional biopsy than core needle biopsy. While the method of biopsy has no demonstrable effect on the likelihood of finding metastases in the SLN by routine serial sectioning and H&E staining, it may significantly impact the likelihood of finding micrometastases by IHC. IHC should not be used routinely in the evaluation of the SLN and caution should be used when basing treatment decisions (completion axillary lymph node dissection or adjuvant therapy) on IHC-only detected micrometastases.     

Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A New Frontier in the Management of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

Background

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a well-established standard of care for primary operable breast cancer; 5–10% of BCT patients will develop local recurrence (LR). The question then arises: How best to manage the axilla in the setting of LR after previous BCT and SLN biopsy or axillary dissection (ALND)?

Methods

Between 9/96 and 12/04, 117 reoperative SLN were performed for LR after BCT and either SLN biopsy or ALND more than 6 months previously. Because of wide variation in the number of nodes removed at the initial procedure, validation by backup ALND was not feasible in all cases.

Results

Reoperative SLN was successful in 64/117 (55%) patients. SLNs were identified by isotope and dye in 28/64 (44%); isotope only in 29/64 (45%); dye only in 4/64 (6%); 3/64 (5%) unknown. Positive reoperative SLN were found in 10/64 (16%) successful cases. Among 54/64 (84%) patients with negative reoperative SLNs, 23 (43%) had additional non-SLN removed concurrently: these were negative in 21/23 cases (91%). In 2/23 (9%), reoperative SLN were falsely negative: one with a positive intramammary node, and the other with a positive non-SLN palpated at surgery. Success of reoperative SLN was inversely related to number of nodes removed previously, and was more likely to be successful after a previous SLN biopsy than a previous ALND (74% vs. 38%, P = 0.0002). Non-axillary drainage was identified by lymphoscintigraphy significantly more often in reoperative SLN than in primary SLN biopsy (30% vs. 6%, P < 0.0001). There were no local or axillary recurrences at a mean follow up of 2.2 years; 6 patients developed systemic recurrence.

Conclusions

Reoperative SLN biopsy is feasible in the setting of LR after previous BCT/axillary surgery and deserves further study in this increasingly common clinical scenario. The added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy in identifying sites of non-axillary drainage may be greater in the setting of reoperative SLN than for the initial SLN procedure.

     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is successful and accurate in male breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Men and women with breast cancer have similar risks of morbidity related to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy minimizes this risk. We report results from the largest series of SLN biopsies for male breast cancer and compare this experience with that of female counterparts treated concurrently. STUDY DESIGN: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center SLN biopsy database showed that 7,315 SLN biopsy procedures were performed for primary breast cancer from September 1996 to July 2005. Of these, 78 (1.0%) procedures were performed in men. Followup data were obtained from medical record review. RESULTS: SLN biopsy was successful in 76 of 78 (97%) patients. Negative SLNs were found in 39 of 76 (51%) patients. In 3 (8%) patients with negative SLNs, a positive non-SLN was found, identified by intraoperative palpation. Positive SLNs were found in 37 of 76 (49%) patients. In 22 of 37 (59%), node positivity was determined intraoperatively, prompting immediate ALND. In 15 of 37 (41%) patients with positive SLNs, node positivity was determined postoperatively. Of these 15, 9 (60%) underwent completion ALND. In the 2 of 78 (3%) patients with failed SLN biopsy procedures, ALND was performed and yielded positive nodes. At a median followup of 28 months (range 5 to 96 months), there were no axillary recurrences. Compared with their female counterparts, men with breast cancer had larger tumors and were more likely to have positive nodes. CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy is successful and accurate in male breast cancer patients. Although a larger proportion of men have positive nodes, for men with negative nodes, SLN biopsy may reduce morbidity related to ALND.     

The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the rate of axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SLN biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer. Nevertheless, most validated series of SLN biopsy confirm that the SLN is falsely negative in 5-10% of node-positive cases, and few studies report the rate of axillary local recurrence (LR) for that subset of patients staged by SLN biopsy alone. METHODS: Through December of 2002, 4008 consecutive SLN biopsy procedures were performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for unilateral invasive breast cancer. Patients were categorized in 4 groups: SLN-negative with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n = 326), SLN-negative without ALND (n = 2340), SLN-positive with ALND (n = 1132), and SLN-positive without ALND (n = 210). Clinical and pathologic characteristics and follow-up data for each of the 4 cohorts were evaluated with emphasis on patterns of axillary LR. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1-75), axillary LR occurred in 10/4008 (0.25%) patients overall. In 3 cases (0.07%) the axillary LR was the first site of treatment failure, in 4 (0.1%) it was coincident with breast LR, and in 3 (0.07%) it was coincident with distant metastases. Axillary LR was more frequent among the unconventionally treated SLN-positive/no ALND patients than in the other 3 conventionally treated cohorts (1.4% versus 0.18%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary LR after SLN biopsy, with or without ALND, is a rare event, and this low relapse rate supports wider use of SLN biopsy for breast cancer staging. There is a low-risk subset of SLN-positive patients in whom completion ALND may not be required.     

Therapeutic relevance of breast cancer micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: This review examines the various methods of detecting occult breast cancer metastasis in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). The prognostic relevance of such micrometastases and isolated tumour cells, and their impact on stage migration and decision making with respect to axillary dissection and adjuvant systemic therapy, are discussed. RESULTS: Examination of SLNs by serial section with haematoxylin and eosin and/or immuno histochemical staining significantly increases the detection rate of micrometastases, even in patients with very small (T1) tumours. However, the prognostic relevance of isolated tumour cells and small micrometastases is uncertain. Moreover, deciding which patients might benefit from axillary dissection is complicated by the fact that adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy alone may eradicate most micrometastases. CONCLUSION: Ongoing randomized trials comparing the results of SLN biopsy alone with those of axillary dissection should answer the question of whether isolated tumour cells and small micrometastases are clinically relevant. This should also indicate which patients with SLN micrometastasis are likely to benefit from axillary dissection. In this sense, SLN biopsy must be considered still to be at an investigative stage; outwith clinical trials complete axillary dissection should be performed on all patients with SLN micrometastasis.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Determining Axillary Status and Treatment Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Background Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy assesses an in vivo tumor response while increasing breast conservation. Axillary clearance of nodal disease after treatment defines prognostic stratification. Our study objective was to show that sentinel node staging before treatment can optimize posttreatment prognostic stratification in clinically N0 patients. Methods Eighty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 42 (47%) clinically palpable or image-detected nodes (cN+) were histologically confirmed before treatment (group 1), and 47 (53%) patients without palpable lymph nodes (cN0) had a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy before treatment (group 2). Survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In groups 1 and 2, 82 (92%) of 89 patients had node-positive disease before treatment. Seven (8%) of 89 had negative SLNs and no completion axillary lymph node dissection, 24 (27%) patients had a complete pathologic axillary response (pCR^AX; 11 [26%] of 42 in group 1 and 13 [33%] of 40 in group 2), and 58 (65%) of 89 had residual disease in the axilla. Breast-conserving therapy was applied to 27 (30%) of 89 patients. The seven SLN-negative patients had no axillary recurrence at 25 months, and pCR^AX patients had a significantly higher overall survival than patients with residual disease. Conclusions This study validates the prognostic stratification of patients with a complete pathologic axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The addition of SLN biopsy to cN0 patients before treatment increased accurate nodal staging by 53%, eliminated completion axillary lymph node dissection in 15%, and demonstrated an improved prognosis in 28% of pCR^AX patients. SLN biopsy before treatment provides accurate staging of cN0 patients; allows acquisition of standard treatment markers, prognostic biomarkers, and microarray analysis; and affords prognostic stratification after treatment.     

Lymph node mapping and axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in 243 invasive breast cancers with no palpable nodes. The south Lyon hospital center experience

STUDY AIM: To evaluate the effect of intraoperative lymph node mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) on the axillary staging of patients with N0 breast carcinoma. Two techniques were used: blue dye alone (Evans Blue and Patent Blue) and combined technique (blue dye and isotope). METHODS: The incidence of axillary node metastasis in axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and SLND was compared prospectively. Multiple sections of each SLN were examined by HPS staining and immunohistochemical techniques. Two sections of each non sentinel node in ALND specimens were examined by routine HPS staining. RESULTS: 243 patients underwent ALND after SLN biopsy. The SLN detection rate was 225/243 cases (92.59%): 89.94% with blue dye alone and 100% with the combined technique. The false-negative rate was less than 2%. CONCLUSION: SN biopsy is an accurate staging technique for N0 breast cancer. SLN biopsy with multiple sections and immunohistochemical staining of the SLN can identify significantly more patients with lymph node metastases than ALND with routine HPS staining.     

Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel nodes

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been shown to be relatively accurate in axillary nodal staging in breast cancer. In more than half of the patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN), the SLN was the only lymph node involved in the axilla. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for those female Chinese breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB. All patients had axillary dissection after SLNB. Those patients with metastatic SLN were selected for analysis. Various tumour factors and SLN factors were analysed to study the association with residual lymph node metastasis. Results: A total of 139 SLNB was performed. The success rate of SLN localization, false negative rate and accuracy were 92%, 9% and 95%, respectively. Fifty-five patients had metastases in the SLN. In 38 patients (69%), SLN was the only lymph node involved in the axilla. Tumours <3 cm, a single metastatic SLN, presence of micro metastases and the absence of extracapsular spread in the SLN were associated with the absence of metastasis in the non-sentinel lymph nodes. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate in the nodal staging of Chinese breast cancer patients. Several factors such as tumour <3 cm, a single metastatic SLN, micro metastases and the absence of extracapsular spread in the sentinel node(s) are useful predictors for the absence of residual disease in the axilla. With further studies and verification, these factors may prove to be important in determining which patients with metastatic SLN will require further axillary treatment. Until such information is available, axillary dissection should be performed when positive sentinel nodes are found.     

The effect of changing gamma count threshold on sentinel lymph node accuracy

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been increasingly accepted in many centers as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in the nodal staging of breast cancer. The goal of SLN biopsy is to accurately stage the axilla while minimizing postoperative morbidity. Theoretically, the continuing search for SLNs disrupts additional lymphatics and impacts on operative time. The gamma count threshold is a predefined threshold percentage of the ex vivo count of the "hottest" SLN, which when applied to each individually excised lymph node determines whether a given lymph node is the SLN or a non-SLN. The higher the threshold percentage, the less the number of lymph nodes will meet the criteria of being an SLN. This study examines the hypothesis that changing the gamma count threshold from 10% to 50% will not significantly affect accuracy or the false-negative rate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent SLN biopsy with or without completion axillary lymph node dissection from March 1995 to January 2001 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Data were collected on gamma counts for each SLN and histopathology of each SLN. For each SLN ex vivo gamma count, percentage of the ex vivo gamma count of the "hottest" SLN was calculated. RESULTS: The SLN identification success rate was 94% (163 out of 174 patients). On average, 2.07 SLNs were removed per patient and 58% of patients had more than 1 SLN removed (94 out of 163 patients). Only 10% had 4 or more SLNs removed (17 out of 163 patients). Sentinel lymph node metastasis was found in 21% of patients (35 of 163 patients). Of these 35 patients with positive SLNs, 8 patients had a negative "hottest" SLN when a less radioactive SLN was positive for metastasis. Changing the gamma count threshold from 10% to 50% lowers the extrapolated accuracy from 98% to 95% and increases the extrapolated false-negative rate from 8% to 21%. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and false-negative rate of SLN biopsy varies based on the lower limit gamma threshold. Maintaining our 10% gamma count threshold results in acceptable accuracy and false-negative rates comparable to reported literature.