Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide has been advocated to treat exudative diabetic macular edema. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, interventional, clinical case series examining 210 eyes of 174 patients who received an intravitreal injection of 1 or 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. Inclusion criteria were clinically significant macular edema, visual acuity loss, and leakage shown by fluorescein angiography. Main outcome measures were visual acuity and intraocular pressure. Mean follow-up time +/- SD was 6.6 +/- 3.1 months. RESULTS: In the study group, visual acuity improved significantly (P < 0.001) from a median of 20/200 (mean logMAR, 0.92) at baseline to 20/80 (mean logMAR, 0.82) at 6 months. Mean intraocular pressure +/- SD increased from 15.4 +/- 3.4 mmHg (median, 16 mmHg; range, 6-26 mmHg) to a maximal value of 20.4 +/- 6.2 mmHg (median, 19 mmHg; range, 12-51 mmHg) during the follow-up period. Complications included culture-negative sterile endophthalmitis in six cases and cataract extraction in five eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of 1 to 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide may benefit patients by improving visual acuity in eyes with clinically significant diabetic macular edema. This study did not provide significant evidence to justify its routine use in clinical practice for all patients with diabetic macular edema. A randomized clinical trial on this issue would provide more conclusive evidence and help identify those patients most likely to benefit from intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic diffuse macular edema: preliminary results of a prospective controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of 1 intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide for refractory diffuse diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema unresponsive to laser photocoagulation. In all patients, one eye received the injection, and the other served as a control. INTERVENTION: Intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide under subconjunctival anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was central macular thickness (CMT) at 1, 3, and 6 months, measured by optical coherence tomography. Secondary outcomes were Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores, intraocular pressure, and cataract progression. RESULTS: In this preliminary report, we give the results for 12 patients who had a follow-up of at least 3 months. Seven of them were followed up for 6 months. Before injection, CMT was 509.6+/-143.5 microm (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) in injected eyes, versus 474.4+/-82.6 microm in control eyes. Four weeks after injection, it was 207.3+/-44.2 microm in injected eyes and 506.7+/-122.4 microm in control eyes (P<0.001, bilateral Wilcoxon test for paired samples), and after 12 weeks, 207+/-96.7 microm and 469.3+/-117.6 microm, respectively (P = 0.005). The difference between the CMTs of injected and control eyes was no longer significant at 24 weeks because of the recurrence of macular edema in 5 of 12 injected eyes. Before triamcinolone injection, the ETDRS score was 47.8+/-13 (mean +/- SD; range, 28-66) in injected eyes, versus 51.9+/-14.6 (range, 31-71) in control eyes. Twelve weeks thereafter, the corresponding values were 52.7+/-10.8 (range, 34-70) and 50.8+/-14.3 (range, 29-69), respectively, and at 24 weeks, 54.7+/-7.6 (range, 47-68) and 50.6+/-18.4 (range, 28-71). At no time was the difference between the ETDRS scores for injected and control eyes significant. In 6 of the 12 injected eyes, intraocular pressure exceeded 25 mmHg, and was controlled by topical medication. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone effectively reduces macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema, at least in the short term. Further studies are required to demonstrate that it provides visual benefit.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone compared with macular laser grid photocoagulation for the treatment of cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of cystoid macular edema (CME) treated with intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TA), macular laser grid photocoagulation (MLG), or both (TA+MLG). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, interventional, parallel, three-arm clinical trial. METHODS: SETTING: Institutional clinical study. PATIENTS: Fifty-six patients (63 eyes) affected by diabetic or retinal vein occlusion CME. PROCEDURES: Twenty-two eyes received intravitreal injections of 4 mg TA; 21 eyes underwent MLG; and 20 eyes received intravitreal injection of 4 mg TA, and after 3 months, MLG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT) (by optical coherence tomography), and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 9 +/- 2 months (range 6 to 12 months). Baseline VA (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) and CMT were, respectively, 0.82 +/- 0.19 and 556 +/- 139 microm microns for the TA group, 0.84 +/- 0.15 and 601 +/- 102 microm microns for the MLG group, and 0.83 +/- 0.22 and 573 +/- 106 microm microns for the TA+MLG group (no statistically significant difference among the groups). After the treatment, at 45 days, 3, 6, and 9 months in the TA group, VA had improved (P = .004) by 0.26, 0.25, 0.22, and 0.23 logMAR and CMT had decreased by 37%, 33%, 29%, and 31% (P = < .001). In the MLG group, VA was unchanged although CMT had decreased by 5%, 13%, 14%, and 16% (P = .021). In the TA+MLG group, VA had improved (P = .003) by 0.26, 0.24, 0.19, and 0.20 logMAR, and CMT had decreased by 36%, 34%, 28%, and 29% (P = < .001). The groups receiving triamcinolone had better VA and lower CMT values at all time points (P < .05). A reinjection was performed in eight eyes; intraocular pressure increased in nine eyes (treated with medical therapy), and cataract progressed in one eye. No injection-related complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: TA intravitreal injection improves VA and reduces CMT more than MLG, which in triamcinolone-treated eyes does not offer further advantages. Intravitreal TA injection could be used as primary treatment in patients with CME.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: valuation of retinal thickness changes measured by optical coherence tomography in diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: The authors studied the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in a case series of patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema without evidence of vitreous-macular traction refractory to laser photocoagulation. METHODS: Six eyes with clinically diffuse diabetic macular edema that failed to respond to at least two previous sessions of laser photocoagulation were included. The mean age of selected patients was 72.5+/-13.8 years, with a preoperative best-corrected visual acuity reduced to 1.48+/-0.18 logMar and a mean baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) of 15.17+/-2.64 mmHg. The authors also studied macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT 2000 scanner, Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, CA) - in the preoperative period it was 640.8+/-171.1 microm - and the fluorangiographic (Heidelberg Retina Angiograph, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) patterns, which showed pooling in tardy phases and leakage. Mean follow-up was 4 months. RESULTS: In each patient the authors observed a significant improvement, both functionally and anatomically. Mean best-corrected visual acuity increased in the postoperative period to 0.94+/-0.53 logMar. No patient showed decline of visual acuity at the end of follow-up. Base line macular thickness was reduced in the postoperative period to 312.2+/-157.65 microm measured by OCT and fluorangiographic patterns showed a reduction of pooling and of leakage. The most common complications described in the literature were not observed and the increase of mean IOP in the postoperative period to 18.76+/-5.72 mmHg was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may decrease macular edema and improve visual acuity in eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection as primary treatment for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal triamcinolone injection on the course of diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 diabetic patients were treated with 8 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone injection as the primary therapy for diabetic macular edema. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity, fundus fluorescein angio- graphy, macular edema map values of Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II (HRT II), and intraocular pressures before and after intravitreal injection. RESULTS: The visual acuity increased in 41 of 48 eyes (85.4%) during a mean follow-up time of 7.5 months. The mean baseline best-corrected logMAR (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) value for visual acuities of the patients before intravitreal triamcinolone injection was 1.17+/-0.20. After treatment, it was 0.85+/-0.29 at 1 month, 0.73+/-0.30 at 3 months, and 0.74+/-0.31 at 6 months, and the differences were significant when compared with baseline values (for each, p<0.001). The mean edema map values significantly decreased by 36% at the 6-month examinations when compared with preinjection values (p<0.001). Average intraocular pressure rose 24.3%, 29.1%, and 11.8% from baseline at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up intervals. Intraocular pressure elevation exceeding 21 mmHg was observed in 8 of 48 eyes (16.6%), but was controlled with topical antiglaucomatous medications in all eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone application provides significant improvement in visual acuity of diabetic patients and clinical course of macular edema, and may therefore be a promising approach in the primary treatment of diabetic macular edema.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of chronic pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for chronic pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema (CME) resistant to medical treatment. METHODS: Six eyes of six patients with chronic pseudophakic CME, aged 58-74 years (average 66 years), made up the study population. All eyes had persistent CME despite having received medical treatment for at least 3 months. Intravitreal injection of 4 mg (0.1 ml) triamcinolone acetonide was offered to treat macular oedema. The visual and anatomic responses were observed as well as potential complications related to the injection procedure and corticosteroid medication. RESULTS: The follow-up period was between 6 and 10 months (mean 8.5 months). Baseline central macular thickness averaged 504 microm. At 1 month, a reduction in the mean central macular thickness of 52% from 504 microm to 264 microm was obtained. At 3 and 6 months, the mean central macular thicknesses were 240 microm and 232 microm, respectively. Five of the six eyes maintained a visual gain of 15 or more letters from baseline at 6 months. During follow-up no patient had intraocular pressure (IOP) exceeding 21 mmHg. No injection-related complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide is a promising therapeutic method for chronic pseudophakic CME resistant to medical treatment. Further study with a longer follow-up period and larger series is warranted to assess the treatment's longterm efficacy and safety and the need for retreatment.     

Prospective evaluation of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection in macular edema associated with retinal vascular disorders

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on visual acuity and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in macular edema associated with various retinal vascular disorders. METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized clinical interventional study included 81 eyes (76 patients) comprised of Group I, 57 eyes (51 patients) with diabetic macular edema; Group II, 10 eyes (10 patients) with branch retinal vein occlusion; and Group III, 13 eyes (13 patients) with central retinal vein occlusion. All eyes received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide (with the solvent) in the operation theater under sterile conditions. RESULTS: Mean preinjection central macular thickness was 531.84+/-132 microm in Group I, 458.4+/-149 microm in Group II, and 750.81+/-148 microm in Group III. All groups showed a statistically significant decrease in mean central macular thickness at 1 month (300.7+/-119 microm in Group I, 218.2+/-99 microm in Group II, and 210.5 +/-56 microm in Group III) and 3 months (253.19+/-109 microm in Group I, 187+/-47 microm in Group II, and 182+/-50 microm in Group III) after injection (p < 0.05). Mean follow-up was 22+/-2.4 weeks. Mean visual acuity increased in all three groups (preoperative visual acuity in Group I, 1.2+/-0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 1.24+/-0.5 logMAR units; Group III, 1.1+/-0.4 logMAR units; 1 month postinjection in Group I, 0.88+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group II, 0.67+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.86+/-0.4 logMAR units; 3 months postinjection in Group I, 0.84+/-0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 0.59+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.82+/-0.5 logMAR units) (p < 0.05). Forty-one eyes completed 6 months and 20 eyes completed 9 months follow-up. Twelve of 20 (41%) eyes in Group I, 2/6 (33%) eyes in Group II, 3/6 (50%) eyes in Group III, and 8/15 (53%) eyes in Group I, 1/3 (33%) eyes in Group II, and 2/2 (100%) eyes in Group III developed recurrence of macular edema with worsening of visual acuity at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Thirty-three (40.7%) eyes developed IOP elevation (at least one reading > 24 mmHg). One eye developed infective endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be considered as an effective treatment for reducing macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema, venous occlusion associated macular edema, and may result in increase in visual acuity at least in the short term. Further follow-up and analysis is required to demonstrate its long-term efficacy.     

Safety of intravitreal high-dose reinjections of triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE: To report side effects after intravitreal high-dose reinjections of triamcinolone acetonide. DESIGN: Clinical interventional case series. METHODS: Forty-six patients (47 eyes) received at least two intravitreal injections of approximately 20 to 25 mg triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diabetic macular edema (n = 6 eyes), exudative age-related macular degeneration (n = 23), and other diseases. Intervals between injections were 6.7 +/- 3.4 months, 8.0 +/- 4.6 months, and 10.2 months, respectively, before the second (n = 47 eyes), third (n = 9), and fourth (n = 2) injection. Mean follow-up was 20.7 +/- 8.9 months. RESULTS: After no reinjection were complications detected, other than those known to occur after a single intravitreal injection. After the first, second, and third injection, respectively, intraocular pressure remained normal in 24 (51%), 25 (53%), and 5 (56%) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal high-dosage reinjections of triamcinolone acetonide may be tolerated within a mean follow-up of approximately 21 months.     

Trans-Tenon's Retrobulbar Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide for Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose To determine whether a trans-Tenon's retrobulbar injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is a safe and effective treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Methods Thirty-nine eyes of 30 diabetic patients with persistent macular edema were treated with 20 mg of TA injection. Central macular thickness (CMT) determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity were evaluated before the injection and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, and up to 1 year in some eyes, after the injection. Results The CMT decreased significantly from 478 ± 129 μm (mean ± SD) before injection to 316 ± 102 μm at 1 month, 307 ± 104 μm at 2 months, and 275 ± 89 μm at 3 months after a single injection of TA. A 20% reduction of CMT from the initial value was maintained by a single injection of TA in 27 of 39 eyes (69.2%) at 3 months, in 14 of 22 eyes (63.6%) at 6 months, and in 5 of 7 eyes at 12 months. A recurrence of macular edema was observed in 10% of the eyes at 3 months, and in 22.7% at 6 months. The 17 eyes in which vitrectomy had been carried out had a more significant improvement in CMT than the eyes without vitrectomy. Conclusion A 20-mg trans-Tenon's retrobulbar TA injection is a safe and effective treatment for diabetic macular edema. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2005;49:509–515 ? Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2005     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diffuse diabetic macular oedema: 6-month results of a prospective controlled trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide for refractory diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Seventeen patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema unresponsive to laser photocoagulation. In all patients, one eye was injected, and the other served as a control. The intervention consisted in intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The main outcome measure was central macular thickness (CMT) at 4, 12 and 24 weeks, measured by Optical Coherence Tomography. Secondary outcomes were Early Treatment Diabetic Rentinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores, intraocular pressure and cataract PROGRESSION. RESULTS: Before injection, mean +/- SD CMT was 566.4 +/- 182.4 mum in injected eyes. Four, 12, and 24 weeks after injection, it was 228.4 +/- 47.5 mum, 210.9 +/- 87.2 mum and 358.5 +/- 160.5 mum respectively. CMT was significantly lower in injected eyes vs. control eyes except 24 weeks after injection because of a recurrence of macular edema in 9/17 injected eyes. Mean +/- SD gain in ETDRS score was significantly better in injected eyes vs. control eyes 4, 12 and 24 weeks after TA injection. In 9 of the 17 injected eyes, intraocular pressure exceeded 24 mmHg and was controlled by topical medication. CONCLUSION: In the short-term, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone effectively reduces macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema and improves visual acuity in most cases. The long-term effect of this treatment and predictive factors of visual recovery remain to be elucidated.     

玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德治疗视网膜静脉阻塞黄斑水肿

目的:评价玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿的疗效及并发症。方法:患者30例30眼玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德4mg治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿,观察治疗前、后的最佳矫正视力、眼压、裂隙灯显微镜检查、眼底荧光血管造影和光学相干断层扫描的变化,采用SPSS 12.0软件进行统计学分析。结果:所有患者手术后视力均显著提高,平均黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)显著减少。病程、年龄、注射前CMT及视网膜静脉阻塞的类型和视力预后无相关性,注射前视力与注射后末次视力呈正相关。结论:玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿简单、安全、易操作,短期内可以迅速减轻黄斑水肿,最终的视力预后取决于治疗前的视力,部分患者在注射后3 ～6mo可能复发。     

Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To determine if intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide is safe and effective in treating diabetic macular edema unresponsive to prior laser photocoagulation. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen eyes with clinically significant diabetic macular edema (CSME) that failed to respond to at least two previous sessions of laser photocoagulation. METHODS: Eyes were diagnosed with CSME and treated with at least two sessions of laser photocoagulation according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines. At least 6 months after initial laser therapy, the response was measured by clinical examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Eyes with a residual central macular thickness of more than 300 microm (normal, 200 microm) and visual loss from baseline were offered intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The visual and anatomic responses were observed as well as complications related to the injection procedure and corticosteroid medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and quantitative change in OCT macular thickening were assessed. Potential complications were monitored, including intraocular pressure response, cataract progression, retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, and endophthalmitis. RESULTS: All patients completed 3 months of follow-up, and 8 of 16 patients (50%) completed 6 or more months of follow-up. Mean improvement in visual acuity measured 2.4, 2.4, and 1.3 Snellen lines at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up intervals, respectively. The central macular thickness as measured by OCT decreased by 55%, 57.5%, and 38%, respectively, over these same intervals from an initial pretreatment mean of 540.3 microm (+/-96.3 microm). Intraocular pressure exceeded 21 mmHg in 5, 3, and 1 eye(s), respectively, during these intervals. One eye exhibited cataract progression at 6 months. No other complications were noted over a mean follow-up of 6.2 months. Reinjection was performed in 3 of 8 eyes after 6 months because of recurrence of macular edema. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone is a promising therapeutic method for diabetic macular edema that fails to respond to conventional laser photocoagulation. Complications do not appear to be prohibitive. Further study is warranted to assess the long-term efficacy and safety, and the need for retreatment.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone injection for chronic diffuse diabetic macular oedema

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone in chronic diffuse diabetic macular oedema. METHODS: This prospective, interventional consecutive case series study consisted of 59 eyes (36 patients) with chronic diffuse diabetic macular oedema, which received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The results were evaluated by clinical examination and fluorescein angiography. Potential complications such as a rise in intraocular pressure, cataract progression and endophthalmitis were recorded. RESULTS: All patients completed at least 6 months follow up. The mean visual acuity improved significantly from 0.17 +/- 3.4 to a maximum of 0.30 +/- 3.3 at the third postinjection month (P < 0.01). Mean improvements in visual acuity measured were 2.15 +/- 1.66, 2.42 +/- 2.66, 1.13 +/- 2.74, 0.96 +/- 2.01 and 0.08 +/- 2.34 lines at the 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up intervals, respectively. In all eyes in fluorescein angiography, macular oedema was resolved (63%) or decreased (37%) during the follow up. However, the macular oedema reached the pretreatment level in 29 (49%) of the eyes at 6 months and 15 of 21 eyes (71%) at 9 months after injection. Intraocular pressure exceeded 21 mmHg in 10 eyes, which were controlled by topical medication. Four eyes showed cataract progression. Endophthalmitis was not observed in any of the eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide appears to be an effective and relatively safe therapeutic method for diffuse diabetic macular oedema. Further studies are warranted to assess the long-term efficacy, safety and the need for reinjection.     

Early treatment of severe cystoid macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion with posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of posterior sub-Tenon (PST) injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in the early treatment of severe cystoid macular edema (CME) in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: In a noncomparative, prospective study, 18 eyes of 18 patients with severe CME (central macular thickness, CMT >450 microm) secondary to recent-onset CRVO (the onset of symptoms < or =4 weeks) and a decrease in visual acuity (< or =80 letters of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] scores, 20/50) were included. PST injection of 40 mg of TA was given under topic anesthesia. All patients received three biweekly injections and were evaluated at baseline and at 1 day, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks, and 3, 6, and 9 months after injection. The main outcome measures were ETDRS scores, CMT, intraocular pressure (IOP), cataract progression, and frequency of complications. RESULTS: The mean age of the 18 patients was 61.17 years (range, 24-81 years) and the mean duration of symptoms was 15.28 days (range, 9-28 days). Eight eyes were diagnosed with ischemic CRVO and 10 eyes with nonischemic CRVO. Mean baseline ETDRS visual acuity (VA) score was 36.89 +/- 18.22 in all affected eye. There was a significant improvement in VA at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months of follow-up. The mean VA at these time points were 46.61 +/- 20.21, 58.11 +/- 22.19, 59.39 +/- 22.98, and 58.67 +/- 23.27 (all P < 0.001), respectively. Both nonischemic and ischemic eyes benefited with a statistically significant VA improvement at each time point. A comparison of the gain in VA between two subgroups was not significant at 1 and 3 months (P > 0.05), but was statistically significant at 6 and 9 months (P = 0.009 and 0.008, respectively). VA gain of 10 or more letters was found in all nonischemic eyes (10/10) and 3 ischemic eyes (3/8) at the 9-month follow-up. Two ischemic eyes were found to have no gain of letters in VA at the 9-month follow-up. The mean baseline CMT for all eyes was 566 +/- 42 microm. There was a 29% reduction with a mean CMT of 404 +/- 49 microm (P < 0.001) at 1 month, 51% reduction with a mean CMT of 278 +/- 40 microm (P < 0.001) at 3 months, 61% reduction with a mean CMT of 222 +/- 56 microm (P < 0.001) at 6 months, and 63% reduction with a mean CMT of 210 +/- 30 microm (P < 0.001) at 9 months. Both nonischemic and ischemic eyes demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in CMT (all P < 0.001). A comparison of the reduction in CMT between these two subgroups was not significant at each visit (all P > 0.05). For both subgroups, there was no statistically significant difference in IOP change at baseline, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 9 months of follow-up. Only two patients required topic antiglaucoma drops for elevated IOP. Three patients developed a recurrence of CME accompanied with visual decrease. No cataract progression or other complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PST injection of TA is effective in reversing CME and improving visual acuity in recent-onset CRVO in the first 9 months. Patients with nonischemic CRVO may respond more favorably than patients with ischemic CRVO. Early treatment may be better for visual improvement before longstanding macular edema results in irreversible photoreceptor damage. Further study with longer follow-up period is necessary.     

Inter-eye difference in diabetic macular edema after unilateral intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE: To report on visual outcome of patients receiving intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative clinical interventional study. METHODS: Setting: Institutional. patient population: The study included 25 consecutive patients (50 eyes) with bilateral diabetic macular edema. Intervention procedure: Unilateral intravitreal injection of about 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide into the eye (study group) more severely affected by diabetic maculopathy. The contralateral eyes served as control group. Mean follow-up was 7.1 +/- 4.1 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual acuity, intraocular pressure. RESULTS: In the study group, visual acuity increased significantly (P < or = .001) by 3.0 +/- 2.6 Snellen lines to a peak at two to six months after the injection, and decreased significantly (P = .001) towards the end of follow up. At the end of follow-up, visual acuity was higher, not significantly (P = .18) higher, than at baseline. An increase in visual acuity was found in 23 eyes (92%). In the control group, differences between visual acuity at baseline and at any of the re-examinations during follow-up were not significant (P > .10). In an intra-individual inter-eye comparison, gain in visual acuity was significantly (P < .05) higher in the injected eyes, for the measurements obtained up to four months after injection. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may temporarily increase visual acuity in eyes with diabetic macular edema.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of intraocular proliferative, exudative, and neovascular diseases

Within the last three years, triamcinolone acetonide has increasingly been applied intravitreally as treatment option for various intraocular neovascular edematous and proliferative disorders. The best response in terms of gain in visual acuity after the intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide was found in eyes with intraretinal edematous diseases such as diffuse diabetic macular edema, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, and pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Visual acuity increased and degree of intraocular inflammation decreased in eyes with various types of non-infectious uveitis including acute or chronic sympathetic ophthalmia and Adamantiadis-Behcet's disease. Intravitreal triamcinolone may be useful as angiostatic therapy in eyes with iris neovascularization and proliferative ischemic retinopathies. Possibly, intravitreal triamcinolone may be helpful as adjunct therapy for exudative age-related macular degeneration, possibly in combination with photodynamic therapy. In eyes with chronic, therapy resistant, ocular hypotony, intravitreal triamcinolone can induce an increase in intraocular pressure and may stabilize the eye. The complications of intravitreal triamcinolone therapy include secondary ocular hypertension in about 40% of the eyes injected, cataractogenesis, postoperative infectious and non-infectious endophthalmitis, and pseudo-endophthalmitis. Intravitreal triamcinolone injection can be combined with other intraocular surgeries including cataract surgery. Cataract surgery performed some months after the injection does not show a markedly elevated rate of complications. If vision increases and eventually decreases again after an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection, the injection can be repeated. The duration of the effect of a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone depended on the dosage given. Given in a dosage of about 20mg to non-vitrectomized eyes, the duration of the effect and of the side-effects was 6-9 months. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may offer a possibility for adjunctive treatment of intraocular edematous and neovascular disorders. One has to take into account the side-effects and the lack of long-term follow-up observations.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone reinjection for refractory diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) reinjection on clinical and optical coherence tomographic features in refractory diabetic macular edema. METHODS: In a prospective interventional case series, all IVT treated patients enrolled in a previous clinical trial were recalled to have a new ophthalmologic examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed. Eyes found suitable for reinjection received 4 mg IVT. Complete clinical examination and OCT were repeated at 2 and 4 months post-injection. The changes were statistically analyzed using a paired t test and were compared to the results of the first injections. RESULTS: Of all returning patients, 12 cases with complete records were considered candidates for reinjection. Visual acuity (VA) changes were not significant after the first and second interventions, although there was a relative improvement (0.14 logMAR) 2 months after the first injection. Reductions of central macular thickness (CMT) were 43 +/- 69 microm, and 40 +/- 69 microm after the first injection and 27 +/- 48 microm, 49 +/- 58 microm after the reinjection at 2 & 4 months, respectively. None of the mentioned changes was significant. After the second injection, however, intraocular pressure was elevated at both 2 & 4 months (3.6 & 2.4 mmHg respectively, P < 0.05). Two months after the first administration, intraocular pressure was found to be raised significantly (5.58 mmHg, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The transient beneficial effects of IVT on diabetic macular edema are not repeated with second injections. However, IVT-related ocular hypertension is more persistent after reinjection. Korean     

Triple therapy of vitrectomy, intravitreal triamcinolone, and macular laser photocoagulation for intractable diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a sequentially combined triple therapy on intractable diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Prospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Twenty-four eyes from 24 subjects, diagnosed with intractable DME of nontractional origin, were subjected to vitrectomy. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and macular laser photocoagulation were conducted sequentially at one and 14 days after vitrectomy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded before surgery and at three, six, and 12 months after triple therapy. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVAs before and three, six, and 12 months after the triple therapy were 0.88 +/- 0.37, 0.55 +/- 0.33, 0.56 +/- 0.27, and 0.48 +/- 0.28, respectively. The mean (+/- SD) CMTs before and three, six, and 12 months after the triple therapy were 514 +/- 187 microm, 253 +/- 138 microm, 219 +/- 95 microm, and 197 +/- 91 microm, respectively. The changes in both BCVA and CMT at three, six, and 12 months from baseline were statistically significant (P < .003). The major adverse events after triple therapy were development of nuclear sclerotic cataracts (eight among 12 phakic eyes) and elevation of intraocular pressure (eight among 24 eyes). CONCLUSIONS: The triple therapy may facilitate early recovery of vision and may improve the long-term outcomes in some patients with DME refractory to conventional monotherapy.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to Behçet disease

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in patients with cystoid macular edema (CME) associated with Beh?et disease. DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: Ten eyes of 10 patients with CME from Beh?et disease made up the study population. All eyes had persistent CME despite medical treatment for at least 2 months. Intravitreal injection of 4 mg (0.1 ml) of triamcinolone acetonide was offered to treat macular edema. The visual and anatomic responses were observed. RESULTS: At 1-month follow-up, a reduction in mean foveal thickness of 37.4%, from 416 microm to 260.5 microm, was attained. At 3-month follow-up, mean foveal thickness was 286.2 microm and at 6 months, 263.7 microm. No eyes had lost vision at 1 month, and eight eyes (80%) showed improvement in visual acuity. At 3-month and 6-month follow-up, three eyes (30%) remained stable and the other eyes had maintained the improved acuity. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide is a promising therapeutic method for CME from Beh?et disease.     

Duration of the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the duration of the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on visual acuity in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Clinical interventional case series. METHODS: Subjects were 31 patients (38 eyes) with diffuse diabetic macular edema who received an intravitreal injection of 20- to 25-mg triamcinolone acetonide. Mean follow-up time was 13.2 +/- 6.0 months (6.03-25.2 months). RESULTS: Visual acuity and intraocular pressure began to increase significantly (P =.003) within the first week, reaching a plateaulike maximum at 1 to 7 months postinjection, returning to baseline values 8 to 9 months postinjection. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of an intravitreal injection of approximately 20- to 25-mg triamcinolone acetonide in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema lasts approximately 7 to 8 months. This information may be helpful in determining the optimal dosage of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.