Adoption of Medicaid Expansion Is Associated with Lower Maternal Mortality

ObjectivesThis study explores the effect of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act on the maternal mortality ratio in the United States.MethodsA difference-in-differences research design was used to analyze the effect of Medicaid expansion on maternal mortality. Maternal mortality was defined with and without late maternal deaths, to substantiate the contribution of increased preconception and postpartum insurance coverage. To examine whether there was a racial difference in the effects of Medicaid expansion, models were stratified by the woman's race/ethnicity for non-Hispanic Black women, non-Hispanic White women, and Hispanic women.ResultsMedicaid expansion was significantly associated with lower maternal mortality by 7.01 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births (p = .002) relative to nonexpansion states. When maternal mortality definitions excluded late maternal deaths, Medicaid expansion was significantly associated with a decrease in maternal mortality per 100,000 live births by 6.65 (p = .004) relative to nonexpansion states. Medicaid expansion effects were concentrated among non-Hispanic Black mothers, suggesting that expansion could be contributing to decreasing racial disparities in maternal mortality.ConclusionsAlthough maternal mortality overall continues to increase in the United States, the maternal mortality ratio among Medicaid expansion states has increased much less compared with nonexpansion states. These results suggest that Medicaid expansion could be contributing to a relative decrease in the maternal mortality ratio in the United States. The decrease in the maternal mortality ratio is greater when maternal mortality estimates include late maternal deaths, suggesting that sustained insurance coverage after childbirth as well as improved preconception coverage could be contributing to decreasing maternal mortality.     

Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Review of Insertion and Device Reimbursement Policies

BackgroundPrevious assessment of statewide policies on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) indicate that an increasing number of states are implementing policies specifically for provision immediately postpartum, supported by current clinical guidelines. Less is known about how state policies describe payment methodologies for the insertion procedure and device costs.MethodsWe conducted a systematic, web-based review of publicly available statewide policy language on immediate postpartum LARC among all 50 states. We examined the payor/s identified in the policy and policy type, if the policy included language on the global obstetric fee, whether providers and/or facilities were authorized to bill for procedure or device costs, and if the billing mechanism was identified as inpatient and/or outpatient services.ResultsThree-fourths of states (76%; n = 38) had statewide policies on immediate postpartum LARC. All policies identified Medicaid as the payor, although two also included non-Medicaid plans. Language allowing for reimbursement separate from the global obstetric fee for insertion procedures was present in 76% of states; 23 states permit it and 6 do not. Device cost reimbursement separate from the fee was identified in more state policies (92%); 31 states allow it and 4 do not. More policies included inpatient or outpatient billing mechanisms for device costs (82%; n = 31) than insertion procedures (50%; n = 19).ConclusionsMedicaid reimbursement policies for immediate postpartum LARC services vary by state reimbursement process, type, and mechanism. Observed differences indicate payment methodologies more often include the cost of the device than provider reimbursement (31 states vs. 23 states). Fewer than one-half of states offer reimbursement for provider insertion fees, a significant systems barrier to contraceptive access for women who choose LARC immediately postpartum.     

Concordance of Desired and Administered Postpartum Contraceptives among Emergency and Full Scope Medicaid Patients

ObjectiveTo determine if concordance of contraceptive preference and uptake differ between postpartum recipients of emergency versus full scope Medicaid.Study DesignWe performed a historical cohort study of patients who delivered at a safety-net hospital in Denver, Colorado in 2016. In our public system, all patients had access to immediate postpartum tubal ligation and all forms of reversible contraception in outpatient clinics. We used data from electronic health records to compare contraceptive preferences and uptake between patients with full scope and emergency Medicaid at hospital discharge and by 12 weeks postpartum. We then compared contraceptive concordance (use of the same method as desired during delivery admission) between the groups at time of postpartum discharge and by 12 weeks postpartum.ResultsWe examined 693 women; 349 (50.1%) had emergency Medicaid and 344 (49.9%) had full scope Medicaid. The mean age at delivery was 27.9 years, and most patients were Hispanic (74%). Women with emergency Medicaid were less likely to receive their desired method of postpartum contraception before hospital discharge (53.6% vs. 66.9%; p < .01). One-half of the patients with emergency Medicaid who did not receive their desired method of immediate postpartum contraception were unable to obtain it based on insurance ineligibility. By 12 weeks postpartum, the rates of concordance did not differ by insurance status: 52.4% of patients with emergency Medicaid and 55.2% of patients with full scope Medicaid received their desired method of contraception (p = .46).ConclusionsEmergency Medicaid recipients, largely recent and/or unauthorized immigrants, have high demand for highly effective postpartum contraceptives. Although emergency Medicaid recipients initially had lower rates of receipt of their desired contraceptive during the hospital stay compared with those with full scope Medicaid, they ultimately had similar concordance rates by 12 weeks postpartum. We suspect this finding was in part due to free access to all methods of contraception in our outpatient clinics during the postpartum course. Systemic barriers should be reduced to ensure better access to postpartum contraceptives for all patients, regardless of insurance coverage, to improve reproductive equity.     

Postpartum Medicaid Coverage and Contraceptive Use Before and After Ohio's Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act

BackgroundEnsuring that women with Medicaid-covered births retain coverage beyond 60 days postpartum can help women to receive care that will improve their health outcomes. Little is known about the extent to which the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion has allowed for longer postpartum coverage as more women entering Medicaid under a pregnancy eligibility category could now become income eligible. This study investigates whether Ohio's Medicaid expansion increased continuous enrollment and use of covered services postpartum, including postpartum visit attendance, receipt of contraceptive counseling, and use of contraceptive methods.MethodsWe used Ohio's linked Medicaid claims and vital records data to derive a study cohort whose prepregnancy and 6-month postpartum period occurred fully in either before (January 2011 to June 2013) or after (November 2014 to December 2015) the ACA Medicaid expansion implementation period (N = 170,787 after exclusions). We categorized women in this cohort according to whether they were pregnancy eligible (the treatment group) or income eligible (the comparison group) as they entered Medicaid and used multivariate logistic regression to test for differences in the association of the ACA expansion with their postpartum enrollment in Medicaid and use of services.ResultsWomen who entered Ohio Medicaid in the pregnancy eligible category had a 7.7 percentage point increase in the probability of remaining continuously enrolled 6 months postpartum relative to those entering as income eligible. Income eligible women had approximately a 5.0 percentage point increased likelihood of both a postpartum visit and use of long-acting reversible contraceptives. Pregnancy-eligible women had a significant but smaller (approximately 2 percentage point) increase in the likelihood of long-acting reversible contraceptive use.ConclusionsOhio's ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with a significant increase in the probability of women's continuous enrollment in Medicaid and use of long-acting reversible contraceptives through 6 months postpartum. Together, these changes translate into decreased risks of unintended pregnancy and short interpregnancy intervals.     

Provision of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Before and After Wisconsin Medicaid's Payment Change

ObjectivesWe aimed to estimate the association between Medicaid unbundling of payment for long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) from the global delivery fee and immediate postpartum (IPP) LARC provision, in a state outside a select group of early-adopters. We also examine the potential moderating roles of hospital academic affiliation and Catholic status on the association between unbundling and IPP LARC provision.MethodsWe used a pre–post design to examine the association between unbundling and IPP LARC provision. We observed Medicaid-covered childbirth deliveries in Wisconsin hospitals between January 2016 and December 2017 (n = 45,200) in the State Inpatient Database from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. We conducted multivariate regressions using generalized linear mixed models.ResultsFrom 2016 to 2017, IPP LARC provision increased from 0.28% to 0.44% of deliveries (p = .003). In our adjusted model, IPP LARC provision was 1.55 times more likely in the post–period versus the pre-period (95% confidence interval, 1.12–2.13). Both before and after unbundling, IPP LARC provision was significantly more common in academic versus nonacademic settings and was exceedingly rare in Catholic institutions.ConclusionsIn contrast with many early adopting states, in this later adopting state, Wisconsin Medicaid's unbundling of LARC from the global fee did not meaningfully change the rates of IPP LARC provision. These results indicate that delivery hospital characteristics are strong correlates of access to IPP LARC and suggest the need for interventions—perhaps outside of the inpatient setting—to ensure that patients can access desired contraceptive methods promptly postpartum.     

Postpartum Contraception Use by Urban/Rural Status: An Analysis of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Data

ObjectiveWe sought to examine rural/urban differences in postpartum contraceptive use, which are underexplored in the literature.MethodsWe analyzed phase 5 (2004–2008) of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Using Rural–Urban Commuting Area codes and weighted multinomial logistic regression, we examined the association between self-reported postpartum contraceptive method and rural/urban residence among postpartum women not desiring pregnancy (n = 6,468).ResultsPostpartum (mean, 16.5 weeks after delivery), 14.4% of respondents were using sterilization, 6.7% long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), 37.3% moderately effective hormonal methods, 38.4% less effective methods or no method, and 3.2% abstinence. Multivariable analysis yielded sporadic geographic patterns. Odds of method use varied significantly by age, parity, body mass index, and breastfeeding status. Not discussing contraception with a prenatal healthcare provider decreased odds of postpartum LARC use (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36–0.75). Number of prenatal visits and weeks since delivery were not associated with postpartum contraception method.ConclusionsWe did not observe strong variation in postpartum contraceptive use based on geography. Low uptake of highly effective contraception across rural and urban areas suggests a need for education and outreach regarding these methods.     

Impacts of Medicaid Expansion on Health Insurance and Coverage Transitions among Women with or at Risk for HIV in the United States

BackgroundAs employment, financial status, and residential location change, people can gain, lose, or switch health insurance coverage, which may affect care access and health. Among Women's Interagency HIV Study participants with HIV and participants at risk for HIV attending semiannual visits at 10 U.S. sites, we examined whether the prevalence of coverage types and rates of coverage changes differed by HIV status and Medicaid expansion in their states of residence.MethodsGeocoded addresses were merged with dates of Medicaid expansion to indicate, at each visit, whether women lived in Medicaid expansion states. Age-adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and rate differences of self-reported insurance changes were estimated by Poisson regression.ResultsFrom 2008 to 2018, 3,341 women (67% Black, 71% with HIV) contributed 43,329 visits at aged less than 65 years (27% under Medicaid expansion). Women with and women without HIV differed in their proportions of visits at which no coverage (14% vs. 19%; p < .001) and Medicaid enrollment (61% vs. 51%; p < .001) were reported. Women in Medicaid expansion states reported no coverage and Medicaid enrollment at 4% and 69% of visits, respectively, compared with 20% and 53% of visits for those in nonexpansion states. Women with HIV had a lower rate of losing coverage than those without HIV (RR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.95). Compared with nonexpansion, Medicaid expansion was associated with lower coverage loss (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.72) and greater coverage gain (RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 2.02 to 2.67), with no differences by HIV status.ConclusionsBoth women with HIV and women at high risk for HIV in Medicaid expansion states had lower coverage loss and greater coverage gain; therefore, Medicaid expansion throughout the United States should be expected to stabilize insurance for women and improve downstream health outcomes.     

Disparities in the prevalence of comorbidities among US adults by state Medicaid expansion status

IntroductionAbout 92% of US older adults have at least one chronic disease or medical condition and 77% have at least two. Low-income and uninsured adults in particular experience a higher burden of comorbidities, and the Medicaid expansion provision of the Affordable Care Act was designed to improve access to healthcare in this population group. However, a significant number of US states have declined expansion. The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of low-income and uninsured adults in expanded versus non-expanded states, and evaluate the prevalence of comorbidities in both groups.MethodsData from the 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) dataset was analyzed, and Medicaid expansion status was assessed from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services report on State Medicaid and CHIP Income Eligibility Standards. Next, age adjusted mean number of comorbidities between expanded and non-expanded states was compared, with adjustment for socio-demographic differences.ResultsExpanded states had a higher proportion of adults with income of at least $50,000 per year (39.6% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.01) and a lower proportion of individuals with no health insurance coverage (15.2% vs. 20.3%, p < 0.01) compared with non-expanded states. Among the uninsured, there was a higher proportion of obese (31.6% vs. 26.9%, p < 001), and higher average number of comorbidities (1.62 vs. 1.52, p < 0.01) in non-expanded states compared to expanded states. Overall, the prevalence of comorbidities was higher among BRFSS participants in states that did not expand Medicaid compared with those in expanded states.ConclusionStates without Medicaid expansion have a greater proportion of poor, uninsured adults with more chronic diseases and conditions.     

Impacts of the Affordable Care Act on Receipt of Women's Preventive Services in Community Health Centers in Medicaid Expansion and Nonexpansion States

BackgroundThe Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased health insurance coverage throughout the United States and improved care delivery for some services. We assess whether ACA implementation and Medicaid expansion were followed by greater receipt of recommended preventive services among women and girls in a large network of community health centers.MethodsUsing electronic health record data from 354 community health centers in 14 states (10 expansion, 4 nonexpansion), we used generalized estimating equations and difference-in-difference methods to compare receipt of six recommended preventive services (cervical cancer screening, human papilloma virus vaccination, chlamydia screening, influenza vaccination, human immunodeficiency virus screening, and blood pressure screening) among active female patients ages 11 to 65 (N = 711,121) before and after ACA implementation and between states that expanded versus did not expand Medicaid.ResultsExcept for blood pressure screening, receipt of all examined preventive services increased after ACA implementation in both Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states. Influenza vaccination and blood pressure screening increased more in expansion states (adjusted absolute prevalence difference-in-difference, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.51–2.60; and 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–3.05, respectively). Chlamydia screening increased more in nonexpansion states (adjusted absolute prevalence difference-in-difference: ?4.21; 95% confidence interval, ?6.98 to ?1.45). Increases in cervical cancer screening, human immunodeficiency virus screening, and human papilloma virus vaccination did not differ significantly between expansion and nonexpansion states.ConclusionsAmong female patients at community health centers, receipt of recommended preventive care improved after ACA implementation in both Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states, although the overall rates remained low. Continued support is needed to overcome barriers to preventive care in this population.     

Contraceptive Use Patterns among Women of Reproductive Age in Two Southeastern States

BackgroundUnintended pregnancies remain an important public health issue. Modern contraception is an important clinical service for reducing unintended pregnancy. This study examines contraception use among a representative sample of women residing in two southeastern U.S. states.MethodsA cross-sectional statewide survey assessing women's contraceptive use and reproductive health experiences was conducted in Alabama and South Carolina. Characteristics of the study population were compared across contraceptive use categories and multivariable regression analysis was performed examining relationships between covariates of interest and contraceptive use outcomes.ResultsApproximately 3,775 women were included in the study population. Overall, 26.5% of women reported not using any contraception. Short-acting hormonal methods were the most commonly reported (26.3%), followed by permanent methods (24.4%), long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; 14.3%), and barrier/other methods (8.5%). Nonuse was more prevalent among women with some college or an associate's degree, incomes between $25,000 and $50,000, no health insurance, and longer gaps in care. LARC use among women with Medicaid as a pay source was higher than use among privately insured women and higher in South Carolina than Alabama. Both nonuse and LARC use were higher among women with no insurance.ConclusionsStudy findings are largely consistent with previous research using similar population-based surveys. LARC use was higher among the study population relative to what is observed nationally. Factors enabling access to contraceptive services, particularly for lower income women, were associated with contraception use patterns. These findings provide important context for understanding individuals’ access to resources and are important for fostering increased access to contraceptive services among women in these two states.     

Association of Medicaid Expansion With Access to Abortion Services for Women With Low Incomes in Oregon

BackgroundThe Affordable Care Act allowed states to expand Medicaid eligibility for women with low incomes before pregnancy. Women who experience an unintended pregnancy may encounter fewer delays in accessing abortion services if they are already enrolled in Medicaid. In states where the Medicaid program includes coverage for abortion services, Medicaid expansion may increase timely access to abortion services. Oregon has expanded Medicaid and is 1 of 16 states in which the Medicaid program covers abortion services. We explored how Medicaid expansion in Oregon was associated with Medicaid-financed abortion rates and receipt of medication abortion relative to surgical abortion.MethodsUsing Medicaid claims and eligibility data we identified women ages 19 to 43 (n = 30,367) who had abortions before the expansion period (2008–2013) and after the expansion period (2014–2016). We used American Community Survey data to estimate the annual number of Oregon women aged 19 to 43 with incomes below 185% of the federal poverty level who would be eligible for a Medicaid-financed abortion. We conducted interrupted time series analyses using negative binomial and logistic regression models.ResultsIncidence of Medicaid-financed abortion increased from 13.4 in 1,000 women in 2008 to 16.3 in 2016. Medication abortion receipt increased from 11.5% of abortions in 2008 to 31.7% in 2016. For both outcomes, we identified an increasing time trend after Medicaid expansion, followed by a subsequent leveling off of the trend. By the end of 2016, incidence of Medicaid-financed abortion was 4.5 abortions per 1,000 women-years (95% confidence interval, 3.3–5.7) higher than it would have been without expansion and medication abortions comprised a 7.4 percentage point (95% confidence interval, 4.4–10.4) greater share of all abortions.ConclusionsMedicaid expansion was associated with increased receipt of Medicaid-financed abortions and may have reduced out-of-pocket payment among women with low incomes. Increased receipt of medication abortion may indicate that expansion enhanced earlier access to services, possibly as a result of increased prepregnancy Medicaid enrollment, and this earlier access may increase reproductive autonomy and safety.     

Rethinking Medicaid Coverage and Payment Policy to Promote High Value Care: The Case of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

Context

Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is the most effective reversible method to prevent unplanned pregnancies. Variability in state-level policies and the high cost of LARC could create substantial inconsistencies in Medicaid coverage, despite federal guidance aimed at enhancing broad access. This study surveyed state Medicaid payment policies and outreach activities related to LARC to explore the scope of services covered.

Diet quality,risk factors and access to care among low-income uninsured American adults in states expanding Medicaid vs. states not expanding under the affordable care act

BackgroundThe Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion varies in availability across states.PurposeWe compared characteristics of low-income uninsured residents in both Medicaid nonexpanding and expanding states with respect to their dietary quality, health risk factors, and access to care.MethodsData from the 2007–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey was matched with the Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid expansion data. Bivariate and multivariate regressions were estimated to assess differences across expanding and non-expanding states.ResultThe non-expansion group had a lower Healthy Eating Index score (41.8 vs. 44.1, p-value = 0.006), a higher Body Mass Index (29.9 vs. 28.9, p-value = 0.032), higher obesity prevalence (41% vs. 33%, p-value = 0.007), and lower asthma prevalence (14.8% vs. 19.7%, p-value = 0.037) compared with the expansion group.ConclusionsDifferences across states in Medicaid coverage under the ACA may lead to widening disparities in health outcomes between expanding and non-expanding states.     

Contraception After Surgical Abortion in Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

ObjectivesThis study describes the prevalence of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among surgical abortion patients, evaluates long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) uptake after surgical abortion among patients on MOUD, and identifies predictors of immediate postabortion LARC uptake among individuals on MOUD.MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of data from a retrospective observational cohort study of LARC uptake immediately after surgical abortion up to 21^0/7 weeks gestation at Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts between October 2012 and April 2017. We estimated proportions and analyzed predictors of LARC uptake among women on MOUD using logistic regression analysis to control for possible confounders.ResultsDuring the study period, 26,858 patients had an abortion procedure; 768 (2.9%; 95% confidence interval, 2.7%–3.1%) used MOUD. In the primary study, controlling for demographic factors, MOUD was not an independent predictor of LARC uptake. In this analysis, patients on MOUD differed demographically from non-MOUD users and were significantly more likely to initiate a LARC method immediately after their procedure: 30.1% versus 25.3% (p = .002), including 22.7% who obtained an intrauterine device and 7.4% who obtained an implant. Among patients on MOUD, a prior live birth and public insurance predicted LARC uptake at the time of abortion.ConclusionWomen on MOUD had higher postabortion LARC uptake compared with those not on MOUD in a setting with easy access to postabortion LARC. Public insurance coverage for abortion was associated with LARC uptake among women on MOUD.     

COVID‐19‐related Medicaid enrollment in Medicaid expansion and non‐expansion states

Research ObjectiveTo explore whether expanded Medicaid helps mitigate the relationship between unemployment due to COVID and being uninsured. Unanticipated unemployment spells are generally associated with disruptions in health insurance coverage, which could also be the case for job losses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Expanded access to Medicaid may insulate some households from long uninsurance gaps due to job loss.Data SourcePhase 1 of the Census Bureau''s Experimental Household Pulse Survey covering April 23, 2020–July 21, 2020.Study DesignWe compare differences in health insurance coverage source and status linked to recent lob losses attributable to the COVID‐19 pandemic in states that expanded Medicaid against states that did not expand Medicaid.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsOur analytical dataset was limited to 733,181 non‐elderly adults aged 20–64.Principal FindingsTwenty‐six percent of our study sample experienced an income loss between March 13, 2020, and the time leading up to the survey—16% experienced job losses (e.g., layoff, furlough) due to the COVID‐19 crisis, and 11% had other reasons they were not working. COVID‐linked job losses were associated with a 20 (p < 0.01) percentage‐point (PPT) lower likelihood of having employer‐sponsored health insurance (ESI). Relative to persons in states that did not expand Medicaid, persons in Medicaid expansion states experiencing COVID‐linked job losses were 9 PPT (p < 0.01) more likely to report having Medicaid and 7 PPT (p < 0.01) less likely to be uninsured. The largest increases in Medicaid enrollment were among people who, based on their 2019 incomes, would not have qualified for Medicaid previously.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that expanded Medicaid eligibility may allow households to stabilize health care needs and they should become detached from private health coverage due to job loss during the pandemic. Households negatively affected by the pandemic are using Medicaid to insure themselves against the potential health risks they would incur while being unemployed.     

Cost Sharing and Utilization of Postpartum Intrauterine Devices and Contraceptive Implants Among Commercially Insured Women

BackgroundCost sharing may impede postpartum contraceptive use. We evaluated the association between out-of-pocket costs and long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) insertion among commercially insured postpartum women.MethodsUsing the Clinformatics Data Mart, we examined out-of-pocket costs for LARC insertions at 0 to 3 and 4–60 days postpartum among women in employer-sponsored health plans from 2013 to 2016. Patient costs were estimated by summing copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payments for LARC services (device + placement). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between plan cost sharing for LARC services (at least one beneficiary with >$200 cost share) and LARC insertion by 60 days postpartum (yes/no).ResultsWe identified 396,073 deliveries among women in 51,797 employer-based plans. Overall, LARC placement by 60 days postpartum was observed after 5.2% (n = 20,604) of deliveries. Inpatient LARC insertion (n = 233; 0.06% of deliveries) was less common than outpatient LARC insertion (n = 20,375; 5.14% of deliveries). Cost sharing was observed in 23.4% of LARC insertions (inpatient IUD: median, $50.00; range, $0.93–5,055.91; inpatient implant: median, $11.91; range, $2.49–650.14; outpatient IUD: median, $25.00; range, $0.01–3,354.80; outpatient implant: median, $27.20; range, $0.18–2,444.01). Among 5,895 plans with at least one LARC insertion and after adjusting for patient age, poverty status, race/ethnicity, region, and plan type, women in plans with cost sharing of more than $200 demonstrated lower odds of LARC use by 60 days postpartum (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.77).ConclusionsCost sharing for postpartum LARC is associated with use, suggesting that out-of-pocket costs may impede LARC access for some commercially insured postpartum women. Reducing out-of-pocket costs for the most effective forms of contraception may increase use.     

Effects of the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act on health insurance coverage,health care access,and use for people with disabilities

BackgroundPeople with disabilities have higher health care needs, service utilization, and expenditures. They are also more likely to lack insurance and experience unmet need for medical care. There has been limited research on the effects of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion on people with disabilities.ObjectiveTo examine the effects of the Medicaid expansion on health insurance coverage, access, and service use for working-age adults with disabilities.MethodsA retrospective study using 11 years (2007–2017) of data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - Household Components, linked to Area Health Resource Files and Local Area Unemployment Statistics (N = 40,995). Difference-in-differences multinomial logistic and linear probability models with state and year fixed-effects were used to estimate the effects.ResultsWe found strong evidence of increased Medicaid coverage in expansion states (3.2 to 5.0 percentage points), reasonably strong evidence of reduced private insurance coverage (?2.2 to ?2.5 percentage points), and some evidence of reduced uninsured rate (from no effect to ?3.7 percentage points). Results suggest that the increase in Medicaid coverage was due at least in part to the “crowd-out” of private insurance in expansion states. No statistically significant effects were detected for access and use outcomes.ConclusionsFindings suggest that state Medicaid expansions led to an increase in Medicaid coverage and a decrease in private insurance coverage as well as the uninsured. However, no evidence was found for health care access and use outcomes. Further research into access and use is needed when more data become available for the post-expansion period.