BRCA1 Mutations in Familial Ovarian Cancer

BRCA1 mutation research in ovarian and breast cancer 17q21-linked families has yielded a large number of germline sequence variations. Somatic mutations have been uncommonly reported. We screened 81 probands with primary ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma for BRCA1 mutations. The study group was intentionally biased by the inclusion of 29 probands with a family history of ovarian and/or breast carcinoma, 13 probands diagnosed on or before age 45, seven individuals with a metachronous breast cancer and 51 tumors with BRCA1 LOH. Tumor and/or germline DNA was screened by modified techniques of single-strand confirmation polymorphism analysis, and abnormal banding patterns were sequenced to confirm mutations. Twenty-one (25.9%) BRCA1 sequence variations were identified. Eight mutations were somatic including seven null mutations. Apart from classical hereditary ovarian/breast cancer, a family history of ovarian/breast cancer defines a subset of ovarian cancer individuals with a significant likelihood of either a germline or a somatic BRCA1 gene sequence variation.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutations Screening in Algerian Breast/Ovarian Cancer Families

Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women in Algeria. The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Algerian population is largely unknown. Here, we describe analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 86 individuals from 70 families from an Algerian cohort with a personal and family history suggestive of genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Methods: The approach used is based on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations screening by High-Resolution Melting (HRM) curve analysis followed by direct sequencing. All samples for which no pathogenic mutation was found were analyzed by MLPA for large deletions or duplications. Results: Three distinct pathogenic mutations c.83_84delTG, c.181T>G, c.798_799delTT and two large rearrangements involving deletion of exon 2 and exon 8 respectively, were detected in BRCA1 gene. Moreover 17 unclassified variants and polymorphisms were detected in BRCA1 gene (6 described for the first time). Two pathogenic mutations, c.1310_1313delAAGA and c.5722_5723delCT and 40 unclassified variants and polymorphisms (14 never described before) were identified in BRCA2 gene. Conclusions: For the first time, we used HRM and MLPA to identify BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Algerian patients with a personal and family history suggestive of genetic predisposition to breast cancer. The implications of these new findings in regard to genetic testing and counseling are substantial for the Algerian population.     

海南西部地区乳腺癌患者 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变状态分析

目的 不同的区域及种族的 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变频率差异较大, 着重分析海南西部地区乳腺癌患 者 BRCA1 / 2 基因的突变状态及对患者预后的影响。 方法 选取 2015 年 10 月 ~ 2020 年 12 月在海南西部中 心医院住院并确诊为原发性乳腺癌的 256 例患者为研究对象, 采用变性高效液相色谱法 ( denaturing high performance liquid chromatography, DHPLC) 筛查乳腺癌患者是否存在 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变, 分析 BRCA1 / 2 基 因突变状态及 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变患者的临床特征, 并随访分析患者 5 年生存情况, COX 回归分析影响患者 预后的因素。 结果 256 例乳腺癌患者中共检出 53 例患者发生 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变, 其中 BRCA1 突变率 12. 11 % (31 / 256), BRCA2 突变率 8. 59 % (22 / 256), 其中有害变异率为 7. 03 % (18 / 256)。 BRCA1 / 2 基 因突变患者家族病史、 妇科疾病史、 乳腺疾病史、 雌激素受体 (estrogen receptor, ER)、 原癌基因 (CerbB2) 蛋白阳性比例以及临床病理分级、 临床分期与未突变患者比较差异有统计学意义 (P< 0. 05)。 患者总 体生存率为 83. 59 % , BRCA1 / 2 基因突变者生存率低于未突变者 (P< 0. 05), COX 回归分析显示, BRCA1 / 2 基因突变、 乳腺疾病史、 临床分期、 CerbB-2 阳性、 CEA、 CA199 均是影响乳腺癌患者生存的危险因素 (P< 0. 05)。 结论 通过 DHPLC 可有效筛查海南西部地区乳腺癌患者 BRCA1 / 2 基因的有害变异, BRCA1 / 2 基因突变与临床病理特征及预后密切相关。     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Russian familial breast cancer

We have screened index cases from 25 Russian breast/ovarian cancer families for germ‐line mutations in all coding exons of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, using multiplex heteroduplex analysis. In addition we tested 22 patients with breast cancer diagnosed before age 40 without family history and 6 patients with bilateral breast cancer. The frequency of families with germline mutations in BRCA was 16% (4/25). One BRCA1 mutation, 5382insC, was found in three families. The results of present study, and those of a separate study of 19 breast‐ovarian cancer families, suggest that BRCA1 5382insC is a founder mutation in the Russian population. Three BRCA2 mutations were found in patients with breast cancer without family history: two in young patients and one in patients with bilateral breast cancer. Four novel BRCA2 mutations were identified: three frameshift (695insT, 1528del4, 9318del4) and one nonsense (S1099X). © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

BRCA1 5272-1G>A and BRCA2 5374delTATG are founder mutations of high relevance for genetic counselling in breast/ovarian cancer families of Spanish origin

Infante M, Durán M, Acedo A, Pérez-Cabornero L, Sanz DJ, García-González M, Beristain E, Esteban-Cardeñosa E, de la Hoya M, Teulé A, Vega A, Tejada M-I, Lastra E, Miner C, Velasco EA. BRCA1 5272-1G>A and BRCA2 5374delTATG are founder mutations of high relevance for genetic counselling in breast/ovarian cancer families of Spanish origin.
The distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations in breast/ovarian cancer families varies among different populations, which typically present a wide spectrum of unique mutations. Splicing mutation 5272-1G>A of BRCA1 and frameshift mutation 5374delTATG of BRCA2 are highly prevalent mutations in Castilla-León (Spain), accounting for 18.4% and 13.6% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive families, respectively. To test the presence of founder effects, 9 Spanish 5272-1G>A and 13 5374delTATG families were genotyped with polymorphic markers linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2 . All the 5272-1G>A families shared a common haplotype in eight markers (1.1 Mb region) and the mutation age was estimated in 15 generations (∼380 years). A conserved haplotype associated to 5374delTATG was observed in four markers (0.82 Mb). The mutation occurred approximately 48 generations ago (∼1200 years). Each mutation likely arose from a common ancestor that could be traced to a small area of Castilla-León and expanded to other Spanish regions. They can have a significant impact on the clinical management of asymptomatic carriers as well as on the genetic screening strategy to be followed in populations with Spanish ancestries.     

Mutation Screening of the BRCA1 Gene in Early Onset and Familial Breast/Ovarian Cancer in Moroccan Population

Worldwide variation in the distribution of BRCA mutations is well recognised, and for the Moroccan population no comprehensive studies about BRCA mutation spectra or frequencies have been published. We therefore performed mutation analysis of the BRCA1 gene in 121 Moroccan women diagnosed with breast cancer. All cases completed epidemiology and family history questionnaires and provided a DNA sample for BRCA testing. Mutation analysis was performed by direct DNA sequencing of all coding exons and flanking intron sequences of the BRCA1 gene. 31.6 % (6/19) of familial cases and 1 % (1/102) of early-onset sporadic (< 45 years) were found to be associated with BRCA1 mutations. The pathogenic mutations included two frame-shift mutations (c.798_799delTT, c.1016dupA), one missense mutation (c.5095C>T), and one nonsense mutation (c.4942A>T). The c.798_799delTT mutation was also observed in Algerian and Tunisian BC families, suggesting the first non-Jewish founder mutation to be described in Northern Africa. In addition, ten different unclassified variants were detected in BRCA1, none of which were predicted to affect splicing. Most unclassified variants were placed in Align-GVGD classes suggesting neutrality. c.5117G>C involves a highly conserved amino acid suggestive of interfering with function (Align-GVGD class C55), but has been observed in conjunction with a deleterious mutation in a Tunisian family. These findings reflect the genetic heterogeneity of the Moroccan population and are relevant to genetic counselling and clinical management. The role of BRCA2 in BC is also under study.     

High incidence of mutations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1 and BRCA2</Emphasis> genes in ovarian cancer

The incidence of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in the studied sampling of 74 patients with ovarian cancer was 19%. The incidence of mutations in the Russian sampling of patients, formed without consideration for the family history, is one of the highest in European countries. Retrospective analysis showed that 9% patients carrying mutation had no family history of ovarian or breast cancer. The majority of mutations (86%) were detected in BRCA1 gene, where 5382insC mutation predominated (58%). These data suggest the possibility and advisability of screening for mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes in patients with ovarian cancer, particularly because this population includes patients without family history of ovarian and/or breast cancer. __________ Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 144, No. 7, pp. 93–95, July, 2007     

Recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in ovarian cancer: a founder mutation of BRCA1 identified in the Chinese population

Previous mutational analysis for BRCA gene mutations in sporadic ovarian cancer occurring in Chinese patients in Hong Kong identified six germline BRCA1 mutations and one germline BRCA2 mutation, six of which were novel (Khoo et al., 2000). Knowledge of BRCA gene mutations in the Chinese population is relatively scant. In this study, we focussed on whether any of these mutations could be recurrent in our Chinese population, making use of archival paraffin embedded tissue. A consecutive series of 214 ovarian cancer cases, half of Southern Chinese origin from Hong Kong whilst the other half of Northern Chinese origin from Beijing were used for the study. We identified one further novel mutation, 1081delG, in BRCA1. This was found to occur in two unrelated individuals with shared haplotype as revealed by allelotype analysis, thus demonstrating founder effect. Two other recurrent mutations were also identified, the 2371-2372delTG mutation in BRCA1 and the 3337C>T mutation in BRCA2 recurring in two and three unrelated individuals respectively, giving an overall prevalence 4.7% of recurrent BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer in the Southern Chinese population. Most importantly, all our recurrent mutation carriers were identified from Southern Chinese patients from Hong Kong whilst such mutations were absent in samples from the Northern Chinese. Our findings indicate possible heterogeneity in the BRCA genotype between Northern and Southern Chinese. The identification of a founder mutation and two recurrent mutations moreover, has important implications towards screening strategies for breast and ovarian cancer among Chinese of southern ancestral origin who are now dispersed throughout the world.     

Frequency of three BRCA1 gene founder mutations in breast/ovarian cancer families from the Pomerania-Kujawy region of Poland

A group of 63 families from the Pomerania-Kujawy region were analyzed for three BRCA1 gene Polish founder mutations, 5382insC, 300T>G, and 4153delA, because of breast (BrCa) and/or ovarian cancer (OvCa) history. The analysis was carried out by multiplex polymerase chain reaction method. BRCA1 mutation was revealed in nine (14%) families: in three (33%) of hereditary BrCa and OvCa families, in three (8%) of hereditary BrCa families, and in three (21%) of hereditary OvCa families. According to risk criteria, it was revealed in 45% of high-risk families with more than three cancers, 13% of moderate-risk families with two cancers, and 8% of families with sporadic OvCa. In six families, the mutation was found in a proband with BrCa or OvCa and in three families, the mutation was found in a healthy proband, first-degree relative of a patient deceased of BrCa or OvCa. 5382insC frameshift mutation accounted for 67% and 300T>G missense mutation for 33% of all identified familial mutations. 4153delA frameshift mutation was not found in analyzed sample of families. 5382insC mutation was found in 9% and 300T>G in 5% of all investigated families, and in 27 and 18%, respectively, of high-risk families. This underlines the importance of applying strict inclusion criteria to analyze mutation frequency in hereditary BrCa/OvCa families.     

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Asia: genetic epidemiology of BRCA1 and BRCA2

Ethnic differences in cancer incidence and mortality result from differences in genetic and epidemiologic risk factors. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for a small proportion of all breast cancer cases, but for a much higher proportion of cases with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been identified in individuals of many races and ethnic groups and the frequency of mutations varies between these groups. Some of the differences in cancer risk between populations may be the result of founder mutations in these genes. The cost and time required for mutation analysis are reduced considerably when founder mutations are identified for a specific ethnic group. The BRCA2 999del5 mutation in Iceland and three BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi Jews are well characterized. However, considerably less is known about the contribution of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes outside of European groups. Studies conducted on the Asian populations described here have expanded our current knowledge of genetic susceptibility and its contribution to breast and ovarian cancer rates in Asian populations.     

Evaluation of two different models to predict BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a cohort of Danish hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer families

To meet the increasing demand for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analysis, a robust system for selecting families who have a higher chance of a mutation has become important. Several models have been developed to help predict which samples are more likely to be mutation positive than others. We have undertaken a complete BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analysis in 267 Danish families with high-risk family history. We found deleterious mutations in 28% (76) of the families, 68% (52) of those in BRCA1 and 32% (24) in BRCA2. We compared our results with two popular manual models developed to estimate the chance of a positive result. One is the recently published Manchester model and the other is the Frank 2 model updated by Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc. Neither of the models would have suggested screening all mutation-positive samples. The Manchester model would have suggested screening 124 of the families in the cohort, thereby detecting 54 of 76 mutations (sensitivity 71%; specificity 63%), whereas the Frank 2/Myriad model would have found 60 of 76 mutations by screening 169 samples if a 10% likelihood was adapted (sensitivity 79%; specificity 43%). The updated Manchester model suggested screening 172 families whereby 64 mutations would have been detected (sensitivity 84%; specificity 44%). We conclude that although both models would have reduced the number of samples screened significantly, up to 28% of the mutations would not have been found by applying these models to this Danish cohort of families. This raises the question whether models designed for specific populations can be used in a wider setting.     

Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in French Canadian ovarian cancer cases unselected for family history

The breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, differ in their contribution to ovarian cancer. Recently, founder mutations in each of these genes were identified in Canadian breast cancer and breast ovarian cancer families of French ancestry. We have examined the prevalence of the founder mutations in a series of 113 French Canadian women with ovarian cancer unselected for family history. Germline mutations were found in eight of 99 invasive carcinomas and in none of the 14 tumors of borderline malignancy. Five cases carried the BRCA1 C4446T mutation and two cases carried the BRCA2 8765delAG mutation which are the most common mutations that have been described in French Canadian breast cancer and breast ovarian cancer families. All of these cases reported a family history of at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer, diagnosed below age 60 years, or with ovarian cancer. The identification of founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer cases unselected for family history can facilitate carrier detection when the expected yield of a comprehensive screen may be low.     

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Province of Ontario

In 2001, genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 was introduced in Ontario, for women at high‐risk of breast or ovarian cancer. To date over 30,000 individuals have been tested throughout Ontario. Testing was offered to all Ontario residents who were eligible under any of 13 criteria. We report the results of tests conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2007 to 2014. A total of 4726 individuals were tested, 764 (16.2%) were found to carry a pathogenic variant (mutation). Among 3684 women and men who underwent testing without a known familial BRCA mutation, 331 (9.0%) were found to carry a mutation. Among 1042 women and men tested for a known family mutation, 433 (41.6%) were positive. There were 603 female mutation carriers, of these, 303 were affected with breast or ovarian cancer (50%) and 16 with another cancer (2.3%). Of 284 unaffected female carriers, 242 (85%) were tested for a known family mutation and 42 (15%) were the first person in the family to be tested. By placing greater emphasis on recruiting unaffected female relatives of known mutation carriers for testing, greater than one‐half of newly identified carriers will be unaffected.     

Validation study of the LAMBDA model for predicting the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier status of North American Ashkenazi Jewish women

LAMBDA is a model that estimates the probability an Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) woman carries an ancestral BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation from her personal and family cancer history. LAMBDA is relevant to clinical practice, and its implementation does not require a computer. It was developed principally from Australian and UK data. We conducted a validation study using 1286 North American AJ women tested for the mutations 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2. Most had a personal or family history of breast cancer. We observed 197 carriers. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (a measure of ranking) was 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.77-0.81], similar to that for the model-generating data (0.78; 95% CI = 0.75-0.82). LAMBDA predicted 232 carriers (18% more than observed; p = 0.002) and was overdispersed (p = 0.009). The Bayesian computer program BRCAPRO gave a similar area under the ROC curve (0.78; 95% CI = 0.76-0.80), but predicted 367 carriers (86% more than observed; p < 0.0001), and was substantially overdispersed (p < 0.0001). Therefore, LAMBDA is comparable to BRCAPRO for ranking AJ women according to their probability of being a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier and is more accurate than brcapro which substantially overpredicts carriers in this population.     

BRCA1 Germ‐Line Mutations and Tumor Characteristics in Eastern Chinese Women with Familial Breast Cancer

Although several studies detected the BRCA1 germ‐line mutations in Chinese women with familial breast cancer, most of them did not employ conventional full gene sequencing, especially in eastern China. In addition, the clinicopathological features of BRCA1‐associated breast cancer in Chinese women were not well investigated. In this study, we screened the complete coding regions and exon‐intron boundaries of BRCA1 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐sequencing assay. Immunohistochemistry analyses were performed on tumor samples to detect the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), P53, and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER‐2). Breast cancer patients having one or more affected relatives referred from the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, eastern China during 2008–2011 were selected for the study. A total of 62 familial breast cancer patients received the BRCA1 germ‐line mutation screening. Five deleterious mutations were detected in this cohort. The mutation rate was 11.3% (7/62). We found two novel mutations (3414delC and 5,280 C > T) and two recurrent mutations (5,273 G > A and 5589del8). BRCA1 mutation tumors tended to be negative for ER, PR, and HER‐2, and exhibited high histological grade compared with tumors without BRCA1 mutations. Our study suggests that recurrent mutations may exist in eastern Chinese women with familial breast cancer and PCR‐sequencing assay is a useful tool to screen these mutations. It also suggests that BRCA1‐associated breast cancers in Chinese women exhibit an aggressive phenotype. Anat Rec, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Cancer risks in first degree relatives of BRCA1 mutation carriers: effects of mutation and proband disease status

Background

Mutations in the BRCA1 (MIM 113705) gene are found in many families with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer, and women with a BRCA1 mutation are at significantly higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer than are the general public.

Methods

We obtained blood samples and pedigree information from 3568 unselected cases of early‐onset breast cancer and 609 unselected patients with ovarian cancer from hospitals throughout Poland. Genetic testing was performed for three founder BRCA1 mutations. We also calculated the risk of breast and ovarian cancer to age 75 in the first degree relatives of carriers using Kaplan‐Meier methods.

Results

The three founder BRCA1 mutations were identified in 273 samples (187 with 5382insC, 22 with 4153delA, and 64 with C61G). A mutation was present in 4.3% of patients with breast cancer and 12.3% of patients with ovarian cancer. The overall risk of breast cancer to age 75 in relatives was 33% and the risk of ovarian cancer was 15%. The risk for breast cancer was 42% higher among first degree relatives of carriers of the C61G missense mutation compared to other mutations (HR = 1.42; p = 0.10) and the risk for ovarian cancer was lower than average (OR = 0.26; p = 0.03). Relatives of women diagnosed with breast cancer had a higher risk of breast cancer than relatives of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (OR = 1.7; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

The risk of breast cancer in female relatives of women with a BRCA1 mutation depends on whether the proband was diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer.     

Comprehensive prediction of mRNA splicing effects of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes potentially affecting coding sequence as well as normal splicing activity have confounded predisposition testing in breast cancer. Here, we apply information theory to analyze BRCA1/2 mRNA splicing mutations categorized as VUS. The method was validated for 31 of 36 mutations known to cause missplicing in BRCA1/2 and all 26 that do not alter splicing. All single-nucleotide variants in the Breast Cancer Information Resource (BIC; Breast Cancer Information Core Database; http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic; last access June 1, 2010) were then analyzed. Information analysis is similar in sensitivity to other predictive methods; however, the thermodynamic basis of the theory also enables splice-site affinity to be determined accurately, which is important for assessing mutations that render natural splice sites partially functional and competition between cryptic and natural splice sites. We report 299 of 2,071 single-nucleotide BIC mutations that are predicted to significantly weaken natural sites and/or strengthen cryptic splice sites, 171 of which are not designated as splicing mutations in the database. Splicing alterations are predicted for 68 of 690 BRCA1 and 60 of 958 BRCA2 mutations designated as VUS. These analyses should be useful in prioritizing suspected mutations for downstream expression studies and for predicting aberrantly spliced isoforms generated by these mutations.     

Genomic rearrangements in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes predispose women to breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are 83 and 86 kb long, with coding sequences of 5.7 and 10.2 kb, scattered over 22 and 26 coding exons, respectively. The large majority of the alterations identified in these genes are point mutations and small insertions/deletions. However, an increasing number of large genomic rearrangements are being identified, especially in BRCA1. This review gives a brief overview of the techniques used to screen the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for large rearrangements, and describes those for which the breakpoints have been characterized. The principal mechanisms that are thought to lead to their formation, founder effects, and recombination hotspots, are also discussed.     

Breast and ovarian cancer risk perception after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy due to an inherited mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene

It is often recommended that women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene have their ovaries and fallopian tubes removed to reduce their risk of gynecologic cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate women's perception of their risk of breast and ovarian cancer before and after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy. We surveyed 127 women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and who underwent prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy at the University Health Network, Toronto. Subjects were asked to estimate their risks of breast and ovarian cancer before and after surgery. Their perceived risks of cancers were then compared with published risks, based on their mutation status. BRCA1 carriers estimated their risk of breast cancer risk to be, on average, 69% before surgery and 41% after surgery. They estimated their risk of ovarian cancer to be 55% before surgery and 11% after surgery. BRCA2 carriers estimated their risk of breast cancer to be 69% prior to surgery and 45% after surgery and their perceived risk of ovarian cancer to be 43% before surgery and 8% after surgery. Compared with published risk figures, the perceived risk of ovarian cancer before prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was overestimated by 47% of BRCA1 mutation carriers and by 61% of BRCA2 mutation carriers. Most women who have undergone genetic counseling and subsequently choose prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy accurately perceive their risk of breast cancer. However, in this study, many women overestimated their risk of ovarian cancer, particularly women who carry a BRCA2 mutation.