PARP抑制剂治疗晚期乳腺癌的作用机制及相关研究进展

多聚二磷酸腺苷核糖聚合酶（poly ADP-ribose polymerase，PARP）抑制剂可使乳腺癌细胞的单链DNA损伤修复受阻，而BRCA突变可造成乳腺癌细胞的双链DNA损伤修复功能缺失，因此PARP抑制剂治疗乳腺癌易感基因（breast cancer susceptibility gene，BRCA）突变乳腺癌是通过同时阻断单链DNA和双链DNA损伤修复，导致细胞的DNA损伤修复失败，使癌细胞死亡。目前已研发出多种敏感性和特异性较高的PARP抑制剂，该类药物主要抑制PARP1和PARP2两种亚型。本文总结PARP抑制剂用于治疗BRCA突变乳腺癌的作用机制，并对多种PARP抑制剂单用或联合化疗药物治疗晚期乳腺癌的研究进展进行综述。      

BRCA1/2突变乳腺癌临床诊治新进展—机遇和挑战

BRCA1/2胚系突乳腺癌具有特殊的发病机制及临床病理特征,其临床决策有别于散发性乳腺癌。随着基因测序技术的发展,越来越多的BRCA1/2突变乳腺癌被检测出。BRCA1/2突变乳腺癌的相关临床管理越来越得到重视。本文总结近年来的相关文献,对BRCA1/2突变乳腺癌患者的基因检测和手术、化疗、靶向治疗等诊疗进展进行综述,以期为BRCA1/2突变患者的临床决策提供帮助。      

BRCA1/2突变和同源重组修复缺陷(HRD)检测在乳腺癌中的临床研究进展

乳腺癌已成为发病率最高的癌症。DNA修复缺陷是乳腺癌最重要的特征之一。先前的研究表明,乳腺癌易感基因1/2(breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2,BRCA1/2)突变是预测乳腺癌同源重组修复缺陷(homologous recombination deficiency, HRD)最主要的生物标志物,能识别铂类药物和多腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶(poly ADP ribose polymerase, PARP)抑制剂治疗的获益人群。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)已批准Olaparib和Talazoparib两种PARP抑制剂,用于BRCA1/2突变的早期和晚期乳腺癌的辅助治疗。但中国尚未获批。现有研究表明,一部分非BRCA1/2突变的乳腺癌患者也具有HRD特征,可以从铂类药物或PARP抑制剂中获益。本综述总结了涉及到BRCA1/2突变、同源重组修复(homologous recombination repair, HRR)基因突变和HRD状态检测的临床研究。阐明了各种检测方法在识别乳腺癌患者HRD状态和预测疗效方面的价值,并提出应尽快开发用于中国乳腺癌HR...     

BRCA1/2突变型乳腺癌的治疗策略

BRCA1/2突变型乳腺癌在遗传型乳腺癌中占较大比例,其与BRCA1/2野生型乳腺癌在病理学特性、临床特征等方面均存在差异。近年来的研究表明,BRCA1/2突变型乳腺癌对铂类、PARP抑制剂等药物高度敏感;并且对于BRCA1突变型乳腺癌,联合应用PI3K抑制剂能够增强PARP抑制剂的疗效。但紫杉类药物对BRCA1突变型乳腺癌疗效较差。而蒽环类药物单药或联合紫杉类药物方案对BRCA1/2突变型乳腺癌的疗效仍存在争议。本文综述目前BRCA1/2突变型乳腺癌治疗策略及研究进展,以为该类型乳腺癌患者的个体化治疗提供依据。     

乳腺癌BRCA1基因研究进展

BRCA1（breast cancer susceptibility gene 1）是研究得比较深入的乳腺癌易感基因，其在家族性乳腺癌中的高突变率一直吸引着国内外学者对其引发乳腺癌的机制进行探索。而近年来，在散发性乳腺癌中，BRCA1启动子的高甲基化现象更使其成为了研究的热点。本文将对BRCA1的结构与功能、遗传背景及其未来应用的展望这三部分进行综述。并重点介绍BRCA1启动子甲基化与乳腺癌的关系，以及近年来对BRCA1启动子甲基化的研究进展。     

胚系BRCA基因突变乳腺癌的临床诊治进展

BRCA基因是最常见的乳腺癌易感基因,胚系BRCA突变患者罹患乳腺癌的风险显著增加.随着对BRCA基因的深入研究以及聚ADP-核糖聚合酶(poly ADP-ribose polymerase,PARP)抑制剂的出现,BRCA突变已成为乳腺癌治疗的新靶点.在BRCA突变乳腺癌的治疗中,PARP抑制剂和铂类为两大主要药物选...     

PARP抑制剂在胰腺癌综合治疗中的研究进展

聚腺苷二磷酸-核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂是一类新型靶向药物,通过合成致死机制选择性杀伤同源重组修复功能缺陷的肿瘤细胞,近年来受到广泛关注.目前已有多种PARP抑制剂(PARPi)批准用于卵巢癌及乳腺癌的治疗,开展的多项临床试验显示PARPi在BRCA胚系突变(gBRCAm)的胰腺癌患者中也取得较好的疗效,PARPi联...     

PARP抑制剂在乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展

PARP抑制剂作为一种新型的小分子靶向药物,已经在乳腺癌中进行了广泛的研究,其单药在早期及晚期乳腺癌患者中已经显示出了可观的疗效,但长期单药应用所产生的PARP耐药无法避免。研究表明,PARP抑制剂与其他信号通路靶向药物,如免疫检查点抑制剂、PI3K/AKT通路抑制剂等药物的联合应用可能增强其肿瘤杀伤作用。全文就PARP抑制剂在早期及晚期乳腺癌中的单药及联合应用的研究进展进行综述。     

Therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer

Increasing understanding of the cellular aberrations inherent to cancer cells has allowed the development of therapies to target biological pathways, an important step towards individualization of breast cancer therapy. The clinical development of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, with their novel and selective mechanism of action, are an example of this strategy. PARP plays a key role in DNA repair mechanisms, particularly the base excision repair pathway. Initially developed as inhibitors able to enhance the cytotoxicity of radiation and certain DNA-damaging agents, they have more recently been shown to have single-agent activity in certain tumors. Inhibition of PARP in a DNA repair-defective tumor can lead to gross genomic instability and cell death by exploiting the paradigm of synthetic lethality. Several studies have evaluated the role of PARP inhibitors for treatment of breast cancer, particularly in the context of BRCA-mutated and triple-negative breast cancers. In addition, inhibition of PARPs repair functions for chemotherapy-induced DNA lesions has been shown to potentiate the effect of some chemotherapy regimens. This article discusses the current understanding of PARP inhibition as a treatment for metastatic breast cancer, evidence from clinical trials and addresses its future implications.     

中国汉族人群中BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变携带者患乳腺癌风险的研究

背景与目的：BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变携带者终生患乳腺癌和卵巢癌的风险显著增高。通过遗传咨询,突变携带者可采取适当的措施来降低相应肿瘤的发生风险。目前,相关的报道几乎均为白种人,尚缺乏中国人群的资料。该研究旨在探索中国汉族人群中BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变携带者患乳腺癌的风险。方法：回顾20个经基因检测证实携带BRCA1或BRCA2致病性基因突变的汉族乳腺癌高风险家系。利用Kaplan-Meier生存分析法对女性BRCA1/2基因突变携带者单侧乳腺癌及对侧乳腺癌的累积发病风险进行估算。结果：BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变携带者70岁时单侧乳腺癌的累积发病风险(外显率)分别为67.2%(sx 0.100)和76.8%(sx 0.079)。与BRCA1不同的是,BRCA2基因突变携带者70岁后乳腺癌累积发病率继续增加,到80岁时达93.1%。BRCA1/2基因突变携带者对侧乳腺癌10年和20年的累积发病率分别为19.4%(sx 0.089)和50.3%(sx 0.155)。结论：中国汉族人群中BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变携带者具有很高的乳腺癌发病风险。因而对中国高风险人群进行BRCA1/2基因突变检测具有重要临床意义。     

PARP inhibitors and breast cancer: update and perspectives

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family has become a promising therapeutic target in various malignancies including breast cancer. When homologous recombination repair is deficient, as it is observed in BRCA1/2-mutated tumor models, inhibition of PARP was shown to induce massive and selective tumor cell death (the so-called "synthetic lethality"). In breast cancer, PARP inhibitors have been developed as single-agent in BRCA1/2-mutated tumors or in combination with chemotherapy. Recently, a randomized phase III clinical trial failed to demonstrate any survival improvement by combining the iPARP iniparib to chemotherapy in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. This emphasizes the need for future development of this class of compounds to resolve critical issues such as optimal schedule of administration and association to other anticancer treatments, as well as identification of pertinent biomarkers predictive for efficacy.     

PARP inhibitors: its role in treatment of cancer

PARP is an important protein in DNA repair pathways especially the base excision repair (BER). BER is involved in DNA repair of single strand breaks (SSBs). If BER is impaired, inhibiting poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), SSBs accumulate and become double stand breaks (DSBs). The cells with increasing number of DSBs become more dependent on other repair pathways, mainly the homologous recombination (HR) and the nonhomologous end joining. Patients with defective HR, like BRCA-deficient cell lines, are even...     

Autoimmune response to PARP and BRCA1/BRCA2 in cancer

Purpose

To determine the role of autoantibodies to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 which were involved in the synthetic lethal interaction in cancer.

Methods

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) was used to detect autoantibodies to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 in 618 serum samples including 131 from breast cancer, 94 from lung cancer, 34 from ovarian cancer, 107 from prostate cancer, 76 from liver cancer, 41 from pancreatic cancer and 135 from normal individuals. The positive sera with ELISA were confirmed by Western blot. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the expression of PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 in breast cancer.

Results

Autoantibody frequency to PARP1, BRCA1, and BRCA2 in cancer varied from 0% to 50%. When the sera from cancer patients were tested for the presence of autoantibodies to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2, the autoantibody responses slightly decreased and the positive autoantibody reactions varied from 0% to 50.0%. This was significantly higher autoantibody responses to PARP1 and BRCA1/BRCA2 (especially to PARP1 and BRCA1) in ovarian cancer and breast cancer compared to normal control sera (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01). Immunohistochemistry indicated that Pathology Grade at diagnosis to PARP1 expression in breast cancer was different (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Different cancers have different profiles of autoantibodies. The autoantibodies to proteins involving the synthetic lethal interactions would be novel serological biomarker in some selective cancers.     

Breast conservation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with early stage breast cancer

The role of breast conservation therapy (limited surgery and irradiation of the breast with/without axilla) in the approximately 5% of breast cancer patients who harbour a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2, is a largely unexplored area and is seen by some as controversial. The relatively high cumulative risk of second primary cancers in such patients and concern about a possible decreased ability of mutation carriers to repair DNA damage caused by radiation has fuelled this controversy. Published studies of breast conservation therapy in carriers of a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are reviewed, with particular attention to their methodology. These studies have not demonstrated any increase in radiation sensitivity of normal tissues in mutation carriers, either in terms of increased early or late toxicity or tumourigenesis. Likewise, tumour sensitivity to radiotherapy, which might be expected based on the known functions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, has not been documented to date in mutation carriers. Further, methodologically rigorous studies of large numbers of breast cancer patients who carry a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are required to fully elucidate these issues.     

Models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Han Chinese familial breast and/or ovarian cancer patients

Purpose Our aim was to find an appropriate method to estimate the likelihood that a family history of cancer was a result of a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. We also compared the performance of the established method with three different methods (Couch, Sh-E and BRCApro) to identify an alternative strategy for genetic council targeted to the specified population. Patients and methods The family history as well as individual information of two hundred unrelated probands who had completed BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening was analyzed to assess the likelihood of a pathogenic mutation. A model was developed by empirical method. The performance of this model was validated in a separate patient cohort compared with BRCApro. Results Several factors were associated with mutations in univariate analysis and a logistic model was devised to estimate the probability for a proband of harboring a mutation in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2. Using a greater than 10% probability threshold, the highest accuracy was achieved by the established model when compared to other three models, presenting the highest sensitivity, PPV, NPV and area under ROC curve. The empirical model showed a better ROC curve compared to BRCApro in the verification cohort. Conclusion A probability model targeted to Han Chinese population should be a useful tool in the genetic counseling for the specified ethnic. Its ability to predict BRCA2 mutation carriers needs to be improved. Nan-Yan Rao and Zhen Hu are contributed equally to this work.     

BRCA1/2 mutation analysis in male breast cancer families from North West England

64 families with a history of male breast cancer aged 60 or less or with a family history of male and female breast cancer were screened for the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Seventeen pathogenic BRCA2 and four BRCA1 mutations were identified (34%) in samples from an affected family member. All but one of the mutations segregated with disease where samples were available and pedigree structure permitted. Despite high sensitivity of mutation testing only 64% of families fulfilling BCLC criteria had an identifiable pathogenic mutation. It is possible that at least some of these families may have mutations in other genes, although we found no involvement of CHEK2 1100delC.     

Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Purpose:

The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers; and measure the extent to which host, family history, and cancer treatment-related factors modify the risk.

Patients and methods:

Patients were 810 women, with stage I or II breast cancer, for whom a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had been identified in the family. Patients were followed from the initial diagnosis of cancer until contralateral mastectomy, contralateral breast cancer, death, or last follow-up.

Results:

Overall, 149 subjects (18.4%) developed a contralateral breast cancer. The 15-year actuarial risk of contralateral breast cancer was 36.1% for women with a BRCA1 mutation and was 28.5% for women with a BRCA2 mutation. Women younger than 50 years of age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis were significantly more likely to develop a contralateral breast cancer at 15 years, compared with those older than 50 years (37.6 vs 16.8% P=0.003). Women aged <50 years with two or more first-degree relatives with early-onset breast cancer were at high risk of contralateral breast cancer, compared with women with fewer, or no first-degree relatives with breast cancer (50 vs 36% P=0.005). The risk of contralateral breast cancer was reduced with oophorectomy (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30–0.76; P=0.002).

Conclusion:

The risk of contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers declines with the age of diagnosis and increases with the number of first-degree relatives affected with breast cancer. Oophorectomy reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer in young women with a BRCA mutation.