Synaptic abnormalities and cytoplasmic glutamate receptor aggregates in contactin associated protein-like 2/Caspr2 knockout neurons

Central glutamatergic synapses and the molecular pathways that control them are emerging as common substrates in the pathogenesis of mental disorders. Genetic variation in the contactin associated protein-like 2 (CNTNAP2) gene, including copy number variations, exon deletions, truncations, single nucleotide variants, and polymorphisms have been associated with intellectual disability, epilepsy, schizophrenia, language disorders, and autism. CNTNAP2, encoded by Cntnap2, is required for dendritic spine development and its absence causes disease-related phenotypes in mice. However, the mechanisms whereby CNTNAP2 regulates glutamatergic synapses are not known, and cellular phenotypes have not been investigated in Cntnap2 knockout neurons. Here we show that CNTNAP2 is present in dendritic spines, as well as axons and soma. Structured illumination superresolution microscopy reveals closer proximity to excitatory, rather than inhibitory synaptic markers. CNTNAP2 does not promote the formation of synapses and cultured neurons from Cntnap2 knockout mice do not show early defects in axon and dendrite outgrowth, suggesting that CNTNAP2 is not required at this stage. However, mature neurons from knockout mice show reduced spine density and levels of GluA1 subunits of AMPA receptors in spines. Unexpectedly, knockout neurons show large cytoplasmic aggregates of GluA1. Here we characterize, for the first time to our knowledge, synaptic phenotypes in Cntnap2 knockout neurons and reveal a novel role for CNTNAP2 in GluA1 trafficking. Taken together, our findings provide insight into the biological roles of CNTNAP2 and into the pathogenesis of CNTNAP2-associated neuropsychiatric disorders.Abnormalities in excitatory synapses of cortical pyramidal neurons have emerged as key cellular substrates in the pathogenesis of several psychiatric disorders. Disease-specific disruptions in synaptic morphology or number and glutamate receptors accompany several neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly those that involve deficits in information processing (1). In support of this view, postmortem neuropathological studies found altered dendritic spine density on cortical pyramidal neurons in individuals with intellectual disability (2), autism spectrum disorders (3), and schizophrenia (4). Dendritic spines are the sites of the majority of excitatory glutamatergic synapses in the mammalian brain and represent the postsynaptic compartment of these synapses. Spines are rich in actin, and their morphology changes during development and in various physiological conditions (5). Spines contain glutamate receptors, of which the AMPA subtype are the ones responsible for fast neurotransmission (6). AMPA receptors, like other membrane proteins, are processed in the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi complex, then delivered to synapses by forward trafficking mechanisms (7). At the synapse, they undergo constitutive and regulated exo- and endocytosis, known to modulate synapse strength (6). Together, changes in spine number and morphology, along with glutamate receptor content in synapses, underlie functional connectivity in synaptic circuits.Recent genome-wide association studies, copy number variant (CNV) analyses, and exome sequencing studies have implicated networks of genes that encode glutamatergic synaptic proteins in the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders (8–10). One such gene, which has received considerable attention, is contactin associated protein-like 2 (CNTNAP2). Gene dosage, rare mutations, and common variations in CNTNAP2 have been associated with several neuropsychiatric disorders. Whereas all subjects with disruptions in the CNTNAP2 gene have complex phenotypes, it appears that shared common features are intellectual disability, seizures, autistic phenotype, and language impairments. Genotypes detected in subjects with intellectual disability include inversion of exons 11 and 12, large deletions, frameshift mutation, splice site mutation, exon deletions, deletions of the 3′ UTR, and a complex rearrangement (11). Subjects with autism have been shown to carry copy number variations, complex rearrangements, an intron deletion, a promoter deletion, and amino acid substitutions (12–20). Disruptions detected in schizophrenia include deletion of exons 9–24, an intron deletion, and copy number variations (21–25). Other disease-associated disruptions include a large deletion, intron deletion in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (26, 27), deletion of exons 2–4 in epilepsy (28, 29), and deletion of exons 2–4 in speech delay (30). In addition, common variants in CNTNAP2 have been associated with autism, dyslexia, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (31).A potentially important role for CNTNAP2 in mental disorders is supported by the presence of autism-related behavioral phenotypes in Cntnap2 knockout (KO) mice (32). Sequence variation in CNTNAP2 is associated with altered functional connectivity in the human frontal lobe (33). By contrast, little is understood about the cellular and molecular mechanisms whereby CNTNAP2 controls brain function. Hence, understanding the roles of Cntnap2 gene product in synapses can provide insight into the mechanisms underlying normal and pathological synapse function.The CNTNAP2 gene encodes a neurexin-related cell adhesion molecule, CNTNAP2 or Caspr2. CNTNAP2 was first identified in the peripheral nervous system, where it was shown in vitro to cluster K⁺ channels at the juxtaparanodal region (34). However, CNTNAP2 is also abundant in the brain, where it is enriched in the synaptic plasma membrane fraction (14). Notably, a recent article reported that shRNA-mediated knockdown of CNTNAP2 in young developing cultured cortical neurons causes a significant and cell-autonomous reduction of AMPA and NMDA mEPSCs (miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents) and GABA mIPSCs (miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents), without affecting presynaptic function (35). Knockdown also resulted in reduced dendritic arborization and reduced spine head size, but not spine density. However, the mechanisms whereby CNTNAP2 affects synapses are still poorly understood.In this study, we investigated the cellular phenotypes of neurons generated from Cntnap2 knockout mice, focusing on synapses. We compared the effects of absence of CNTNAP2 in developing and mature neurons and found late-emerging alterations in spine morphology and GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit localization. When investigating the cellular substrates of AMPA receptor abnormalities, we found an unexpected presence of cytoplasmic GluA1-containing aggregates. Taken together, our data show that CNTNAP2 is important for GluA1 localization to spines, and its loss causes the formation of GluA1-containing aggregates. These mechanisms may contribute to cognitive deficits in CNTNAP2-associated disorders and may represent a general mechanism of pathogenesis in these disorders.     

Subset of early radial glial progenitors that contribute to the development of callosal neurons is absent from avian brain

The classical view of mammalian cortical development suggests that pyramidal neurons are generated in a temporal sequence, with all radial glial cells (RGCs) contributing to both lower and upper neocortical layers. A recent opposing proposal suggests there is a subgroup of fate-restricted RGCs in the early neocortex, which generates only upper-layer neurons. Little is known about the existence of fate restriction of homologous progenitors in other vertebrate species. We investigated the lineage of selected Emx2⁺ [vertebrate homeobox gene related to Drosophila empty spiracles (ems)] RGCs in mouse neocortex and chick forebrain and found evidence for both sequential and fate-restricted programs only in mouse, indicating that these complementary populations coexist in the developing mammalian but not avian brain. Among a large population of sequentially programmed RGCs in the mouse brain, a subset of self-renewing progenitors lack neurogenic potential during the earliest phase of corticogenesis. After a considerable delay, these progenitors generate callosal upper-layer neurons and glia. On the other hand, we found no homologous delayed population in any sectors of the chick forebrain. This finding suggests that neurogenic delay of selected RGCs may be unique to mammals and possibly associated with the evolution of the corpus callosum.Several neural progenitor subtypes have been identified in the developing mammalian neocortex (1–4). At the onset of neurogenesis, multipotent proliferative radial glial cells (RGCs) reside at the ventricular surface. RGC divisions can be “self-renewing,” a symmetrical division in which two identical RGCs are generated; “direct neurogenic,” generating a neuroblast and a multipotent progenitor; or “indirect neurogenic,” which gives rise to an intermediate progenitor that migrates to divide in the subventricular zone. The timing of these events is crucial for cell number and fate determination (5–7) and vary among different mammalian species. Importantly, very little is known about the homologous populations of RGCs in other vertebrate species and about their role in cortical evolution.Observations made from Golgi-stained material (4, 8), birth-dating (5, 9), and lineage-tracing analysis (10–14) contributed to the formation of the “sequential” hypothesis. Accordingly, each RGC in the early brain generates most cortical cell types by sequential mitoses (15). Long-range subcortical projection neurons of the deep layers are generated first, followed by the callosal projection neurons of the upper layers, and finally the glial cells (16).However, recent genetic fate mapping of selected lineages has revealed a subpopulation of early RGCs expressing Cux2, which only gives rise to Satb2-positive upper-layer cortical neurons (17). This finding suggests that the early neurogenic brain may contain several types of cortical progenitors, each of which constrained to generating certain subpopulations of neurons, known as the “restricted progenitor hypothesis” (18). The existence of these restricted progenitors has been challenged (1–4, 19). Early clonal analysis performed by retroviral-mediated gene transfer also led to differing interpretations (12, 14, 20).Interestingly, these alternative interpretations diverge in the origin of callosal upper-layer cortical neurons. The appearance of neurons with callosal projections in the upper layers is considered an important event in the evolution of the mammalian neocortex, as there is no corpus callosum in sauropsid brains (21). Based on selected gene expression patterns, Suzuki et al. suggested that upper-layer–like cortical neurons are situated in a different sector of chick pallium with respect to the position of lower-layer–like neurons (22). Their birth-dating studies demonstrated that upper-layer–like neurons are generated in a biased fashion from spatially restricted progenitors (15). They also suggest that the potential to adopt the sequential pattern of neurogenesis remains, but is suppressed in vivo. To resolve these issues, further comparative clonal studies of single progenitors are needed (23, 24).Here we investigate the lineage of selected Emx2⁺ [vertebrate homeobox gene related to Drosophila empty spiracles (ems)] RGCs in the mammalian pallium. We describe a subset of progenitors that lack neurogenic potential during early neocortical development. After self-renewing and transit-amplifying mitoses, these RGC progenitors exclusively give rise to callosal upper-layer neurons and glia. We therefore suggest the temporal and spatial coexistence of restricted and sequential RGC progenitors in the mammalian cortical ventricular zone. Additionally, we observed no homologous heterochronic behavior in this population within chick forebrain, suggesting the neurogenic delay of some RGCs is a mammal-specific attribute, possibly related to the evolution of neurons involved in interhemispheric dorsal pallial communications. Our study establishes the existence, time frame, and lineage of these early Emx2⁺ RGC progenitor population fate restricted to the upper layers of mammalian cortex but absent in the avian brain.     

Loss of Miro1-directed mitochondrial movement results in a novel murine model for neuron disease

Defective mitochondrial distribution in neurons is proposed to cause ATP depletion and calcium-buffering deficiencies that compromise cell function. However, it is unclear whether aberrant mitochondrial motility and distribution alone are sufficient to cause neurological disease. Calcium-binding mitochondrial Rho (Miro) GTPases attach mitochondria to motor proteins for anterograde and retrograde transport in neurons. Using two new KO mouse models, we demonstrate that Miro1 is essential for development of cranial motor nuclei required for respiratory control and maintenance of upper motor neurons required for ambulation. Neuron-specific loss of Miro1 causes depletion of mitochondria from corticospinal tract axons and progressive neurological deficits mirroring human upper motor neuron disease. Although Miro1-deficient neurons exhibit defects in retrograde axonal mitochondrial transport, mitochondrial respiratory function continues. Moreover, Miro1 is not essential for calcium-mediated inhibition of mitochondrial movement or mitochondrial calcium buffering. Our findings indicate that defects in mitochondrial motility and distribution are sufficient to cause neurological disease.Motor neuron diseases (MNDs), including ALS and spastic paraplegia (SP), are characterized by the progressive, length-dependent degeneration of motor neurons, leading to muscle atrophy, paralysis, and, in some cases, premature death. There are both inherited and sporadic forms of MNDs, which can affect upper motor neurons, lower motor neurons, or both. Although the molecular and cellular causes of most MNDs are unknown, many are associated with defects in axonal transport of cellular components required for neuron function and maintenance (1–6).A subset of MNDs is associated with impaired mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial distribution. This observation has led to the hypothesis that neurodegeneration results from defects in mitochondrial motility and distribution, which, in turn, cause subcellular ATP depletion and interfere with mitochondrial calcium ([Ca²⁺]_m) buffering at sites of high synaptic activity (reviewed in ref. 7). It is not known, however, whether mitochondrial motility defects are a primary cause or a secondary consequence of MND progression. In addition, it has been difficult to isolate the primary effect of mitochondrial motility defects in MNDs because most mutations that impair mitochondrial motility in neurons also affect transport of other organelles and vesicles (1, 8–11).In mammals, the movement of neuronal mitochondria between the cell body and the synapse is controlled by adaptors called trafficking kinesin proteins (Trak1 and Trak2) and molecular motors (kinesin heavy chain and dynein), which transport the organelle in the anterograde or retrograde direction along axonal microtubule tracks (7, 12–24). Mitochondrial Rho (Miro) GTPase proteins are critical for transport because they are the only known surface receptors that attach mitochondria to these adaptors and motors (12–15, 18, 25, 26). Miro proteins are tail-anchored in the outer mitochondrial membrane with two GTPase domains and two predicted calcium-binding embryonic fibroblast (EF) hand motifs facing the cytoplasm (12, 13, 25, 27, 28). A recent Miro structure revealed two additional EF hands that were not predicted from the primary sequence (29). Studies in cultured cells suggest that Miro proteins also function as calcium sensors (via their EF hands) to regulate kinesin-mediated mitochondrial “stopping” in axons (15, 16, 26). Miro-mediated movement appears to be inhibited when cytoplasmic calcium is elevated in active synapses, effectively recruiting mitochondria to regions where calcium buffering and energy are needed. Despite this progress, the physiological relevance of these findings has not yet been tested in a mammalian animal model. In addition, mammals ubiquitously express two Miro orthologs, Miro1 and Miro2, which are 60% identical (12, 13). However, the individual roles of Miro1 and Miro2 in neuronal development, maintenance, and survival have no been evaluated.We describe two new mouse models that establish the importance of Miro1-mediated mitochondrial motility and distribution in mammalian neuronal function and maintenance. We show that Miro1 is essential for development/maintenance of specific cranial neurons, function of postmitotic motor neurons, and retrograde mitochondrial motility in axons. Loss of Miro1-directed retrograde mitochondrial transport is sufficient to cause MND phenotypes in mice without abrogating mitochondrial respiratory function. Furthermore, Miro1 is not essential for calcium-mediated inhibition of mitochondrial movement or [Ca²⁺]_m buffering. These findings have an impact on current models for Miro1 function and introduce a specific and rapidly progressing mouse model for MND.     

Fibroblasts secrete Slit2 to inhibit fibrocyte differentiation and fibrosis

Monocytes leave the blood and enter tissues. In healing wounds and fibrotic lesions, some of the monocytes differentiate into fibroblast-like cells called fibrocytes. In healthy tissues, even though monocytes enter the tissue, for unknown reasons, very few monocytes differentiate into fibrocytes. In this report, we show that fibroblasts from healthy human tissues secrete the neuronal guidance protein Slit2 and that Slit2 inhibits human fibrocyte differentiation. In mice, injections of Slit2 inhibit bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. In lung tissue from pulmonary fibrosis patients with relatively normal lung function, Slit2 has a widespread distribution whereas, in patients with advanced disease, there is less Slit2 in the fibrotic lesions. These data may explain why fibrocytes are rarely observed in healthy tissues, may suggest that the relative levels of Slit2 present in healthy tissue and at sites of fibrosis may have a significant effect on the decision of monocytes to differentiate into fibrocytes, and may indicate that modulating Slit2 signaling may be useful as a therapeutic for fibrosis.To help form granulation tissue during wound healing, monocytes leave the circulation, enter the tissue, and differentiate into fibroblast-like cells called fibrocytes (1–4). Fibrocytes are also found in lesions associated with fibrotic diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis, congestive heart failure, cirrhosis of the liver, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (3, 5–9). Fibrocytes express markers of both hematopoietic cells (CD34, CD45, FcγR, LSP-1, and MHC class II) and stromal cells (collagens, fibronectin, and matrix metalloproteases) (2, 3, 10–12). Fibrocytes also promote angiogenesis by secreting VEGF, bFGF, IL-8, and PDGF and promote fibroblast proliferation, migration, and collagen production by secreting TGF-β and CTGF (13, 14). Fibrocyte recruitment and differentiation is regulated by a variety of factors (3, 15). In vitro, monocytes can differentiate into fibrocytes without the addition of any exogenous factors (5, 11, 12, 16–22). A key question about fibrocyte differentiation and fibrosis is why, in healthy tissues where monocytes and macrophages are readily identified, fibrocytes are rarely observed (3, 8, 23–26).In tissues, fibroblasts are a major cell population and can modulate the immune system (27–30). In this report, we show that fibroblasts secrete the neuronal guidance protein Slit2 and that Slit2 inhibits fibrocyte differentiation. In addition, we show that injections of Slit2 reduce bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Finally, we show that, in the mouse pulmonary fibrosis model as well as human patients with pulmonary fibrosis, there seems to be a decrease in Slit2 levels in the lungs, suggesting that pulmonary fibrosis may be in part a Slit2 deficiency disease. These data suggest that the relative level of Slit2 present at sites of wound healing, inflammation, and fibrosis may have a profound effect on the ability of monocytes to differentiate into fibrocytes.     

Drosophila seminal protein ovulin mediates ovulation through female octopamine neuronal signaling

Across animal taxa, seminal proteins are important regulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. However, little is understood about the physiological or molecular mechanisms by which seminal proteins effect these changes. To investigate this topic, we studied the increase in Drosophila melanogaster ovulation behavior induced by mating. Ovulation requires octopamine (OA) signaling from the central nervous system to coordinate an egg’s release from the ovary and its passage into the oviduct. The seminal protein ovulin increases ovulation rates after mating. We tested whether ovulin acts through OA to increase ovulation behavior. Increasing OA neuronal excitability compensated for a lack of ovulin received during mating. Moreover, we identified a mating-dependent relaxation of oviduct musculature, for which ovulin is a necessary and sufficient male contribution. We report further that oviduct muscle relaxation can be induced by activating OA neurons, requires normal metabolic production of OA, and reflects ovulin’s increasing of OA neuronal signaling. Finally, we showed that as a result of ovulin exposure, there is subsequent growth of OA synaptic sites at the oviduct, demonstrating that seminal proteins can contribute to synaptic plasticity. Together, these results demonstrate that ovulin increases ovulation through OA neuronal signaling and, by extension, that seminal proteins can alter reproductive physiology by modulating known female pathways regulating reproduction.Throughout internally fertilizing animals, seminal proteins play important roles in regulating female fertility by altering female physiology and, in some cases, behavior after mating (reviewed in refs. 1–3). Despite this, little is understood about the physiological mechanisms by which seminal proteins induce postmating changes and how their actions are linked with known networks regulating female reproductive physiology.In Drosophila melanogaster, the suite of seminal proteins has been identified, as have many seminal protein-dependent postmating responses, including changes in egg production and laying, remating behavior, locomotion, feeding, and in ovulation rate (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). For example, the Drosophila seminal protein ovulin elevates ovulation rate to maximal levels during the 24 h following mating (4, 5), and the seminal protein sex peptide (SP) suppresses female mating receptivity and increases egg-laying behavior for several days after mating (6–10). However, although a receptor for SP has been identified (11), along with elements of the neural circuit in which it is required (12–14), SP’s mechanism of action has not yet been linked to regulatory networks known to control postmating behaviors. Thus, a crucial question remains: how do male-derived seminal proteins interact with regulatory networks in females to trigger postmating responses?We addressed this question by examining the stimulation of Drosophila ovulation by the seminal protein ovulin. In insects, ovulation, defined here as the release of an egg from the ovary to the uterus, is among the best understood reproductive processes in terms of its physiology and neurogenetics (15–27). In D. melanogaster, ovulation requires input from neurons in the abdominal ganglia that release the catecholaminergic neuromodulators octopamine (OA) and tyramine (17, 18, 28). Drosophila ovulation also requires an OA receptor, OA receptor in mushroom bodies (OAMB) (19, 20). Moreover, it has been proposed that OA may integrate extrinsic factors to regulate ovulation rates (17). Noradrenaline, the vertebrate structural and functional equivalent to OA (29, 30), is important for mammalian ovulation, and its dysregulation has been associated with ovulation disorders (31–38). In this paper we investigate the role of neurons that release OA and tyramine in ovulin’s action. For simplicity, we refer to these neurons as “OA neurons” to reflect the well-established role of OA in ovulation behavior (16–20, 22).We investigated how action of the seminal protein ovulin relates to the conserved canonical neuromodulatory pathway that regulates ovulation physiology (39–41). We found that ovulin increases ovulation and egg laying through OA neuronal signaling. We also found that ovulin relaxes oviduct muscle tonus, a postmating process that is also mediated by OA neuronal signaling. Finally, subsequent to these effects we detected an ovulin-dependent increase in synaptic sites between OA motor neurons and oviduct muscle, suggesting that ovulin’s stimulation of OA neurons could have increased their synaptic activity. These results suggest that ovulin affects ovulation by manipulating the gain of a neuromodulatory pathway regulating ovulation physiology.     

Orexin/hypocretin system modulates amygdala-dependent threat learning through the locus coeruleus

Survival in a dangerous environment requires learning about stimuli that predict harm. Although recent work has focused on the amygdala as the locus of aversive memory formation, the hypothalamus has long been implicated in emotional regulation, and the hypothalamic neuropeptide orexin (hypocretin) is involved in anxiety states and arousal. Nevertheless, little is known about the role of orexin in aversive memory formation. Using a combination of behavioral pharmacology, slice physiology, and optogenetic techniques, we show that orexin acts upstream of the amygdala via the noradrenergic locus coeruleus to enable threat (fear) learning, specifically during the aversive event. Our results are consistent with clinical studies linking orexin levels to aversive learning and anxiety in humans and dysregulation of the orexin system may contribute to the etiology of fear and anxiety disorders.Hess and Akert demonstrated that electrical stimulation of the perifornical (PFH) region of the hypothalamus elicits defensive or aggressive responses in cats (1). Others showed that hypothalamic stimulation can serve as the aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) (2), indicating that the hypothalamus processes threat information important for aversive learning. One possibility is that orexin neurons, which populate these hypothalamic areas, may mediate these observed responses, as these neurons project to and modulate brain areas critical for threat processing, reward, and memory.Orexins are neuropeptides produced in the PFH and lateral regions of the hypothalamus (LH) (3, 4). Two orexin peptides (Orexin-A and Orexin-B) are processed from one peptide precursor (prepro-orexin) and bind two distinct G protein–coupled receptors (OrxR1 and OrxR2) in the brain (3, 4). Activation of either receptor commonly increases excitability in target neurons by reducing potassium channel conductance, enhancing presynaptic glutamate release, or increasing postsynaptic NMDA receptor (NMDAR) conductance (5, 6). Orexin receptors are differentially distributed in the brain and may serve differing roles in stress, arousal, vigilance, feeding, reward processing, and drug addiction (7–10). Evidence suggests that, in general, OrxR2 is involved in maintenance of arousal or wakefulness (11, 12), whereas OrxR1 mediates responses to environmental stimuli (13, 14).Recent reports point to a role for the orexin system in emotional regulation. Overactivity in orexin neurons can exacerbate panic-like episodes and lead to an anxiety-like phenotype in rats (15, 16). Conversely, administration of the dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant blunts autonomic and behavioral responses affiliated with heightened stress levels (17, 18). Although orexin system activity is linked to general states of hyperarousal, the precise role of orexin in these and other aversive states remains unknown.Hypothalamic orexin neurons send a dense output to the locus coeruelus (LC) and depolarize neurons in vitro and in vivo (19–21). In line with their connectivity, LC neurons respond to phasic stimuli in a manner comparable to orexin neurons (22), suggesting that orexin neurons modulate LC responses to salient sensory events. Interestingly, orexin and LC neurons are both activated by aversive stimuli such as shock (23, 24). Thus, orexin could contribute to aversive learning by way of LC, given the importance of norepinephrine to aversive memory processes in amygdala (25–27).Pavlovian threat (fear) conditioning is a well-established behavioral paradigm to assess the formation, storage, and expression of aversive memories (28). During training, animals learn to associate an aversive US, such as a footshock, with a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS), such as a tone, when both occur in close temporal proximity. Here, we tested the hypothesis that orexin neurons phasically activate locus coeruleus neurons during an aversive event to enable threat learning. Using a combination of behavioral pharmacology, electrophysiology, and optogenetic approaches, we show that orexin neurons, via activation of OrxR1 in the LC, facilitate the acquisition of amygdala-dependent threat memory.     

N terminus of ASPP2 binds to Ras and enhances Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK activation to promote oncogene-induced senescence

The ASPP2 (also known as 53BP2L) tumor suppressor is a proapoptotic member of a family of p53 binding proteins that functions in part by enhancing p53-dependent apoptosis via its C-terminal p53-binding domain. Mounting evidence also suggests that ASPP2 harbors important nonapoptotic p53-independent functions. Structural studies identify a small G protein Ras-association domain in the ASPP2 N terminus. Because Ras-induced senescence is a barrier to tumor formation in normal cells, we investigated whether ASPP2 could bind Ras and stimulate the protein kinase Raf/MEK/ERK signaling cascade. We now show that ASPP2 binds to Ras–GTP at the plasma membrane and stimulates Ras-induced signaling and pERK1/2 levels via promoting Ras–GTP loading, B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization, and C-Raf phosphorylation. These functions require the ASPP2 N terminus because BBP (also known as 53BP2S), an alternatively spliced ASPP2 isoform lacking the N terminus, was defective in binding Ras–GTP and stimulating Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Decreased ASPP2 levels attenuated H-RasV12–induced senescence in normal human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. Together, our results reveal a mechanism for ASPP2 tumor suppressor function via direct interaction with Ras–GTP to stimulate Ras-induced senescence in nontransformed human cells.ASPP2, also known as 53BP2L, is a tumor suppressor whose expression is altered in human cancers (1). Importantly, targeting of the ASPP2 allele in two different mouse models reveals that ASPP2 heterozygous mice are prone to spontaneous and γ-irradiation–induced tumors, which rigorously demonstrates the role of ASPP2 as a tumor suppressor (2, 3). ASPP2 binds p53 via the C-terminal ankyrin-repeat and SH3 domain (4–6), is damage-inducible, and can enhance damage-induced apoptosis in part through a p53-mediated pathway (1, 2, 7–10). However, it remains unclear what biologic pathways and mechanisms mediate ASPP2 tumor suppressor function (1). Indeed, accumulating evidence demonstrates that ASPP2 also mediates nonapoptotic p53-independent pathways (1, 3, 11–15).The induction of cellular senescence forms an important barrier to tumorigenesis in vivo (16–21). It is well known that oncogenic Ras signaling induces senescence in normal nontransformed cells to prevent tumor initiation and maintain complex growth arrest pathways (16, 18, 21–24). The level of oncogenic Ras activation influences its capacity to activate senescence; high levels of oncogenic H-RasV12 signaling leads to low grade tumors with senescence markers, which progress to invasive cancers upon senescence inactivation (25). Thus, tight control of Ras signaling is critical to ensure the proper biologic outcome in the correct cellular context (26–28).The ASPP2 C terminus is important for promoting p53-dependent apoptosis (7). The ASPP2 N terminus may also suppress cell growth (1, 7, 29–33). Alternative splicing can generate the ASPP2 N-terminal truncated protein BBP (also known as 53BP2S) that is less potent in suppressing cell growth (7, 34, 35). Although the ASPP2 C terminus mediates nuclear localization, full-length ASPP2 also localizes to the cytoplasm and plasma membrane to mediate extranuclear functions (7, 11, 12, 36). Structural studies of the ASPP2 N terminus reveal a β–Grasp ubiquitin-like fold as well as a potential Ras-binding (RB)/Ras-association (RA) domain (32). Moreover, ASPP2 can promote H-RasV12–induced senescence (13, 15). However, the molecular mechanism(s) of how ASPP2 directly promotes Ras signaling are complex and remain to be completely elucidated.Here, we explore the molecular mechanisms of how Ras-signaling is enhanced by ASPP2. We demonstrate that ASPP2: (i) binds Ras-GTP and stimulates Ras-induced ERK signaling via its N-terminal domain at the plasma membrane; (ii) enhances Ras-GTP loading and B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization and forms a ASPP2/Raf complex; (iii) stimulates Ras-induced C-Raf phosphorylation and activation; and (iv) potentiates H-RasV12–induced senescence in both primary human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. These data provide mechanistic insight into ASPP2 function(s) and opens important avenues for investigation into its role as a tumor suppressor in human cancer.     

Cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 18 is an essential Ca2+ channel in pollen tube tips for pollen tube guidance to ovules in Arabidopsis

In flowering plants, pollen tubes are guided into ovules by multiple attractants from female gametophytes to release paired sperm cells for double fertilization. It has been well-established that Ca²⁺ gradients in the pollen tube tips are essential for pollen tube guidance and that plasma membrane Ca²⁺ channels in pollen tube tips are core components that regulate Ca²⁺ gradients by mediating and regulating external Ca²⁺ influx. Therefore, Ca²⁺ channels are the core components for pollen tube guidance. However, there is still no genetic evidence for the identification of the putative Ca²⁺ channels essential for pollen tube guidance. Here, we report that the point mutations R491Q or R578K in cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 18 (CNGC18) resulted in abnormal Ca²⁺ gradients and strong pollen tube guidance defects by impairing the activation of CNGC18 in Arabidopsis. The pollen tube guidance defects of cngc18-17 (R491Q) and of the transfer DNA (T-DNA) insertion mutant cngc18-1 (+/−) were completely rescued by CNGC18. Furthermore, domain-swapping experiments showed that CNGC18’s transmembrane domains are indispensable for pollen tube guidance. Additionally, we found that, among eight Ca²⁺ channels (including six CNGCs and two glutamate receptor-like channels), CNGC18 was the only one essential for pollen tube guidance. Thus, CNGC18 is the long-sought essential Ca²⁺ channel for pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis.Pollen tubes deliver paired sperm cells into ovules for double fertilization, and signaling communication between pollen tubes and female reproductive tissues is required to ensure the delivery of sperm cells into the ovules (1). Pollen tube guidance is governed by both female sporophytic and gametophytic tissues (2, 3) and can be separated into two categories: preovular guidance and ovular guidance (1). For preovular guidance, diverse signaling molecules from female sporophytic tissues have been identified, including the transmitting tissue-specific (TTS) glycoprotein in tobacco (4), γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) in Arabidopsis (5), and chemocyanin and the lipid transfer protein SCA in Lilium longiflorum (6, 7). For ovular pollen tube guidance, female gametophytes secrete small peptides as attractants, including LUREs in Torenia fournieri (8) and Arabidopsis (9) and ZmEA1 in maize (10, 11). Synergid cells, central cells, egg cells, and egg apparatus are all involved in pollen tube guidance, probably by secreting different attractants (9–15). Additionally, nitric oxide (NO) and phytosulfokine peptides have also been implicated in both preovular and ovular pollen tube guidance (16–18). Thus, pollen tubes could be guided by diverse attractants in a single plant species.Ca²⁺ gradients at pollen tube tips are essential for both tip growth and pollen tube guidance (19–27). Spatial modification of the Ca²⁺ gradients leads to the reorientation of pollen tube growth in vitro (28, 29). The Ca²⁺ gradients were significantly increased in pollen tubes attracted to the micropyles by synergid cells in vivo, compared with those not attracted by ovules (30). Therefore, the Ca²⁺ gradients in pollen tube tips are essential for pollen tube guidance. The Ca²⁺ gradients result from external Ca²⁺ influx, which is mainly mediated by plasma membrane Ca²⁺ channels in pollen tube tips. Thus, the Ca²⁺ channels are the key components for regulating the Ca²⁺ gradients and are consequently essential for pollen tube guidance. Using electrophysiological techniques, inward Ca²⁺ currents were observed in both pollen grain and pollen tube protoplasts (31–36), supporting the presence of plasma membrane Ca²⁺ channels in pollen tube tips. Recently, a number of candidate Ca²⁺ channels were identified in pollen tubes, including six cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGCs) and two glutamate receptor-like channels (GLRs) in Arabidopsis (37–40). Three of these eight channels, namely CNGC18, GLR1.2, and GLR3.7, were characterized as Ca²⁺-permeable channels (40, 41) whereas the ion selectivity of the other five CNGCs has not been characterized. We hypothesized that the Ca²⁺ channel essential for pollen tube guidance could be among these eight channels.In this research, we first characterized the remaining five CNGCs as Ca²⁺ channels. We further found that CNGC18, out of the eight Ca²⁺ channels, was the only one essential for pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis and that its transmembrane domains were indispensable for pollen tube guidance.     

Neuronal calcium-binding proteins 1/2 localize to dorsal root ganglia and excitatory spinal neurons and are regulated by nerve injury

Neuronal calcium (Ca²⁺)-binding proteins 1 and 2 (NECAB1/2) are members of the phylogenetically conserved EF-hand Ca²⁺-binding protein superfamily. To date, NECABs have been explored only to a limited extent and, so far, not at all at the spinal level. Here, we describe the distribution, phenotype, and nerve injury-induced regulation of NECAB1/NECAB2 in mouse dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) and spinal cord. In DRGs, NECAB1/2 are expressed in around 70% of mainly small- and medium-sized neurons. Many colocalize with calcitonin gene-related peptide and isolectin B4, and thus represent nociceptors. NECAB1/2 neurons are much more abundant in DRGs than the Ca²⁺-binding proteins (parvalbumin, calbindin, calretinin, and secretagogin) studied to date. In the spinal cord, the NECAB1/2 distribution is mainly complementary. NECAB1 labels interneurons and a plexus of processes in superficial layers of the dorsal horn, commissural neurons in the intermediate area, and motor neurons in the ventral horn. Using CLARITY, a novel, bilaterally connected neuronal system with dendrites that embrace the dorsal columns like palisades is observed. NECAB2 is present in cell bodies and presynaptic boutons across the spinal cord. In the dorsal horn, most NECAB1/2 neurons are glutamatergic. Both NECAB1/2 are transported into dorsal roots and peripheral nerves. Peripheral nerve injury reduces NECAB2, but not NECAB1, expression in DRG neurons. Our study identifies NECAB1/2 as abundant Ca²⁺-binding proteins in pain-related DRG neurons and a variety of spinal systems, providing molecular markers for known and unknown neuron populations of mechanosensory and pain circuits in the spinal cord.Calcium (Ca²⁺) plays a crucial role in many and diverse cellular processes, including neurotransmission (1). Glutamate and neuropeptides are neurotransmitters released from the central terminals of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons in the spinal dorsal horn, where signals for different sensory modalities, including pain, are conveyed to higher centers (2–12). Neurotransmitter release is tightly regulated by Ca²⁺-dependent SNARE proteins whose activity is regulated by Ca²⁺-binding proteins (CaBPs) (1, 7, 13).Parvalbumin (PV), calbindin D-28K (CB), calretinin (CR), and secretagogin (Scgn) are extensively studied EF-hand CaBPs, and they have also emerged as valuable anatomical markers for morphologically and functionally distinct neuronal subpopulations (14–17). The expression of CaBPs in DRG neurons has been thoroughly studied (18). Moreover, neuronal Ca²⁺ sensor 1 and downstream regulatory element-antagonist modulator (DREAM) are also EF-hand Ca²⁺-binding proteins in DRGs and the spinal cord (19, 20). Despite these advances, a CaBP has so far not been characterized in the majority of small- and medium-sized DRG neurons, many of which represent nociceptors.The subfamily of neuronal Ca²⁺-binding proteins (NECABs) consists of three members (NECAB1–NECAB3), probably as a result of gene duplication (21). NECABs are also EF-hand proteins, with one pair of EF-hand motifs in the N terminus and a putative antibiotic biosynthesis monooxygenase domain in the C terminus, which are linked by a NECAB homogeneous region (22). NECAB1/2 are restricted to the nervous system, whereas NECAB3 is also expressed in the heart and skeletal muscle (21).NECAB1 was first identified as the target protein of synaptotagmin I C2A-domain by affinity chromatography, with its expression restricted to layer 4 cortical pyramidal neurons, inhibitory interneurons, and hippocampal CA2 pyramidal cells in mouse brain (21, 23). The gene of the second member was cloned from mouse and initially named Necab. It encodes a 389-aa (NECAB2) (24). NECAB2 was identified as a downstream target of Pax6 in mouse retina, which is involved in retinal development (24, 25), as well as being a binding partner for the adenosine A_2A receptor (22). Furthermore, an interaction between NECAB2 and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) was demonstrated in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells, possibly regulating mGluR5’s coupling to its signaling machinery (26). Finally, NECAB3, also known as XB51, was isolated as an interacting target for the neuron-specific X11-like protein and is possibly involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (27, 28).Very recently, NECAB1/2 were shown to have complementary expression patterns in mouse hippocampus at the mRNA and protein levels, whereas NECAB3 is broadly distributed in the hippocampus (29). NECAB1-expressing cells were seen throughout the cell-sparse layers of Ammon’s horn and the hilus of the dentate gyrus. In contrast, NECAB2 is enriched in pyramidal cells of the CA2 region. A minority of NECAB1⁺ neurons were GABAergic yet did not coexpress PV, CB, or CR (29).Here, we investigated the expression of NECAB1/2 in mouse DRGs and spinal cord using quantitative PCR (qPCR), immunohistochemistry (also combined with CLARITY) (30), and Western blotting. We compared the distribution of NECABs with that of the four CaBPs restricted to neurons, PV, CB, CR, or Scgn. NECAB⁺ neurons in the spinal dorsal horn were phenotyped using transgenic mice harboring genetic markers for excitatory [vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2)] (31) or inhibitory [glutamate decarboxylase 67 (GAD67)] (32) cell identities. Finally, the effect of peripheral nerve injury was analyzed.     

Electrochemical tuning of vertically aligned MoS2 nanofilms and its application in improving hydrogen evolution reaction

The ability to intercalate guest species into the van der Waals gap of 2D layered materials affords the opportunity to engineer the electronic structures for a variety of applications. Here we demonstrate the continuous tuning of layer vertically aligned MoS₂ nanofilms through electrochemical intercalation of Li⁺ ions. By scanning the Li intercalation potential from high to low, we have gained control of multiple important material properties in a continuous manner, including tuning the oxidation state of Mo, the transition of semiconducting 2H to metallic 1T phase, and expanding the van der Waals gap until exfoliation. Using such nanofilms after different degree of Li intercalation, we show the significant improvement of the hydrogen evolution reaction activity. A strong correlation between such tunable material properties and hydrogen evolution reaction activity is established. This work provides an intriguing and effective approach on tuning electronic structures for optimizing the catalytic activity.Layer-structured 2D materials are an interesting family of materials with strong covalent bonding within molecular layers and weak van der Waals interaction between layers. Beyond intensively studied graphene-related materials (1–4), there has been recent strong interest in other layered materials whose vertical thickness can be thinned down to less than few nanometers and horizontal width can also be reduced to nanoscale (5–9). The strong interest is driven by their interesting physical and chemical properties (2, 10) and their potential applications in transistors, batteries, topological insulators, thermoelectrics, artificial photosynthesis, and catalysis (4, 11–25).One of the unique properties of 2D layered materials is their ability to intercalate guest species into their van der Waals gaps, opening up the opportunities to tune the properties of materials. For example, the spacing between the 2D layers could be increased by intercalation such as lithium (Li) intercalated graphite or molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) and copper intercalated bismuth selenide (26–29). The electronic structures of the host lattice, such as the charge density, anisotropic transport, oxidation state, and phase transition, may also be changed by different species intercalation (26, 27).As one of the most interesting layered materials, MoS₂ has been extensively studied in a variety of areas such as electrocatalysis (20–22, 30–36). It is known that there is a strong correlation between the electronic structure and catalytic activity of the catalysts (20, 37–41). It is intriguing to continuously tune the morphology and electronic structure of MoS₂ and explore the effects on MoS₂ hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity. Very recent studies demonstrated that the monolayered MoS₂ and WS₂ nanosheets with 1T metallic phase synthesized by chemical exfoliation exhibited superior HER catalytic activity to those with 2H semiconducting phase (35, 42), with a possible explanation that the strained 1T phase facilitates the hydrogen binding process during HER (42). However, it only offers two end states of materials and does not offer a continuous tuning. A systematic investigation to correlate the gradually tuned electronic structure, including oxidation state shift and semiconducting–metallic phase transition, and the corresponding HER activity is important but unexplored. We believe that the Li electrochemical intercalation method offers a unique way to tune the catalysts for optimization.In this paper, we demonstrate that the layer spacing, oxidation state, and the ratio of 2H semiconducting to 1T metallic phase of MoS₂ HER catalysts were continuously tuned by Li intercalation to different voltages vs. Li⁺/Li in nanofilms with molecular layers perpendicular to the substrates. Correspondingly, the catalytic activity for HER was observed to be continuously tuned. The lower oxidation state of Mo and 1T metallic phase of MoS₂ turn out to have better HER catalytic activities. The performance of MoS₂ catalyst on both flat and 3D electrodes was dramatically improved when it was discharged to low potentials vs. Li⁺/Li.     

Dissecting neural pathways for forgetting in Drosophila olfactory aversive memory

Recent studies have identified molecular pathways driving forgetting and supported the notion that forgetting is a biologically active process. The circuit mechanisms of forgetting, however, remain largely unknown. Here we report two sets of Drosophila neurons that account for the rapid forgetting of early olfactory aversive memory. We show that inactivating these neurons inhibits memory decay without altering learning, whereas activating them promotes forgetting. These neurons, including a cluster of dopaminergic neurons (PAM-β′1) and a pair of glutamatergic neurons (MBON-γ4>γ1γ2), terminate in distinct subdomains in the mushroom body and represent parallel neural pathways for regulating forgetting. Interestingly, although activity of these neurons is required for memory decay over time, they are not required for acute forgetting during reversal learning. Our results thus not only establish the presence of multiple neural pathways for forgetting in Drosophila but also suggest the existence of diverse circuit mechanisms of forgetting in different contexts.Although forgetting commonly has a negative connotation, it is a functional process that shapes memory and cognition (1–4). Recent studies, including work in relatively simple invertebrate models, have started to reveal basic biological mechanisms underlying forgetting (5–15). In Drosophila, single-session Pavlovian conditioning by pairing an odor (conditioned stimulus, CS) with electric shock (unconditioned stimulus, US) induces aversive memories that are short-lasting (16). The memory performance of fruit flies is observed to drop to a negligible level within 24 h, decaying rapidly early after training and slowing down thereafter (17). Memory decay or forgetting requires the activation of the small G protein Rac, a signaling protein involved in actin remodeling, in the mushroom body (MB) intrinsic neurons (6). These so-called Kenyon cells (KCs) are the neurons that integrate CS–US information (18, 19) and support aversive memory formation and retrieval (20–22). In addition to Rac, forgetting also requires the DAMB dopamine receptor (7), which has highly enriched expression in the MB (23). Evidence suggests that the dopamine-mediated forgetting signal is conveyed to the MB by dopamine neurons (DANs) in the protocerebral posterior lateral 1 (PPL1) cluster (7, 24). Therefore, forgetting of olfactory aversive memory in Drosophila depends on a particular set of intracellular molecular pathways within KCs, involving Rac, DAMB, and possibly others (25), and also receives modulation from extrinsic neurons. Although important cellular evidence supporting the hypothesis that memory traces are erased under these circumstances is still lacking, these findings lend support to the notion that forgetting is an active, biologically regulated process (17, 26).Although existing studies point to the MB circuit as essential for forgetting, several questions remain to be answered. First, whereas the molecular pathways for learning and forgetting of olfactory aversive memory are distinct and separable (6, 7), the neural circuits seem to overlap. Rac-mediated forgetting has been localized to a large population of KCs (6), including the γ-subset, which is also critical for initial memory formation (21, 27). The site of action of DAMB for forgetting has yet to be established; however, the subgroups of PPL1-DANs implicated in forgetting are the same as those that signal aversive reinforcement and are required for learning (28–30). It leaves open the question of whether the brain circuitry underlying forgetting and learning is dissociable, or whether forgetting and learning share the same circuit but are driven by distinct activity patterns and molecular machinery (26). Second, shock reinforcement elicits multiple memory traces through at least three dopamine pathways to different subdomains in the MB lobes (28, 29). Functional imaging studies have also revealed Ca²⁺-based memory traces in different KC populations (31). It is poorly understood how forgetting of these memory traces differs, and it remains unknown whether there are multiple regulatory neural pathways. Notably, when PPL1-DANs are inactivated, forgetting still occurs, albeit at a lower rate (7). This incomplete block suggests the existence of an additional pathway(s) that conveys forgetting signals to the MB. Third, other than memory decay over time, forgetting is also observed through interference (32, 33), when new learning or reversal learning is introduced after training (6, 34, 35). Time-based and interference-based forgetting shares a similar dependence on Rac and DAMB (6, 7). However, it is not known whether distinct circuits underlie forgetting in these different contexts.In the current study, we focus on the diverse set of MB extrinsic neurons (MBENs) that interconnect the MB lobes with other brain regions, which include 34 MB output neurons (MBONs) of 21 types and ∼130 dopaminergic neurons of 20 types in the PPL1 and protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) clusters (36, 37). These neurons have been intensively studied in olfactory memory formation, consolidation, and retrieval in recent years (e.g., 24, 28–30, 38–48); however, their roles in forgetting have not been characterized except for the aforementioned PPL1-DANs. In a functional screen, we unexpectedly found that several Gal4 driver lines of MBENs showed significantly better 3-h memory retention when the Gal4-expressing cells were inactivated. The screen has thus led us to identify two types of MBENs that are not involved in initial learning but play important and additive roles in mediating memory decay. Furthermore, neither of these MBEN types is required for reversal learning, supporting the notion that there is a diversity of neural circuits that drive different forms of forgetting.     

Presynaptic serotonin 2A receptors modulate thalamocortical plasticity and associative learning

Higher-level cognitive processes strongly depend on a complex interplay between mediodorsal thalamus nuclei and the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Alteration of thalamofrontal connectivity has been involved in cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. Prefrontal serotonin (5-HT)_2A receptors play an essential role in cortical network activity, but the mechanism underlying their modulation of glutamatergic transmission and plasticity at thalamocortical synapses remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that 5-HT_2A receptor activation enhances NMDA transmission and gates the induction of temporal-dependent plasticity mediated by NMDA receptors at thalamocortical synapses in acute PFC slices. Expressing 5-HT_2A receptors in the mediodorsal thalamus (presynaptic site) of 5-HT_2A receptor-deficient mice, but not in the PFC (postsynaptic site), using a viral gene-delivery approach, rescued the otherwise absent potentiation of NMDA transmission, induction of temporal plasticity, and deficit in associative memory. These results provide, to our knowledge, the first physiological evidence of a role of presynaptic 5-HT_2A receptors located at thalamocortical synapses in the control of thalamofrontal connectivity and the associated cognitive functions.The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is a brain region critical for many high-level cognitive processes, such as executive functions, attention, and working and contextual memories (1). Pyramidal neurons located in layer V of the PFC integrate excitatory glutamatergic inputs originating from both cortical and subcortical areas. The latter include the mediodorsal thalamus (MD) nuclei, which project densely to the medial PFC (mPFC) and are part of the neuronal network underlying executive control and working memory (2–4). Disruption of this network has been involved in cognitive symptoms of psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia (3, 5). These symptoms severely compromise the quality of life of patients and remain poorly controlled by currently available antipsychotics (3, 6).The PFC is densely innervated by serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) neurons originating from the dorsal and median raphe nuclei and numerous lines of evidence indicate a critical role of 5-HT in the control of emotional and cognitive functions depending on PFC activity (7, 8). The modulatory action of 5-HT reflects its complex pattern of effects on cortical network activity, depending on the 5-HT receptor subtypes involved, and on receptor localization in pyramidal neurons, GABAergic interneurons or nerve terminals of afferent neurons.Among the 14 5-HT receptor subtypes, the 5-HT_2A receptor is a Gq protein-coupled receptor (9, 10) particularly enriched in the mPFC, with a predominant expression in apical dendrites of layer V pyramidal neurons (11–14). Moreover, a low proportion of 5-HT_2A receptors was detected presynaptically on thalamocortical fibers (12, 15–17).Activation of 5-HT_2A receptors exerts complex effects upon the activity of the PFC network (18). The most prominent one is an increase in pyramidal neuron excitability, which likely results from the inhibition of slow calcium-activated after hyperpolarization current (19). 5-HT_2A receptor stimulation also increases the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) in pyramidal neurons (19–22). The prevailing view is that postsynaptic 5-HT_2A receptors expressed on pyramidal neurons located in layer V are key modulators of glutamatergic PFC network activity (14, 21–24). However, the role of presynaptic 5-HT_2A receptors located on thalamic afferents in the modulation of glutamatergic transmission at thalamocortical synapses remains unexplored.Here, we addressed this issue by combining electrophysiological recordings in acute PFC slices with viral infections to specifically rescue the expression of 5-HT_2A receptors at the presynaptic site (MD) or postsynaptic site (PFC) in 5-HT_2A receptor-deficient (5-HT_2A^−/−) mice (25). We focused our study on NMDA transmission in line with previous findings indicating that many symptoms of schizophrenia might arise from modifications in PFC connectivity involving glutamatergic transmission at NMDA receptors (26, 27). To our knowledge, we provide the first direct evidence that stimulation of presynaptic 5-HT_2A receptors at thalamocortical synapses gates the induction of spike timing-dependent long-term depression (t-LTD) by facilitating the activation of presynaptic NMDA receptors at these synapses. In line with the role of t-LTD in associative learning (28), these studies were extended by behavioral experiments to explore the role of presynaptic 5-HT_2A receptors at thalamocortical synapses in several paradigms of episodic-like memory.     

Hyperpolarization-activated,cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels in Aplysia: Contribution to classical conditioning

Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated cation (HCN) channels are critical regulators of neuronal excitability, but less is known about their possible roles in synaptic plasticity and memory circuits. Here, we characterized the HCN gene organization, channel properties, distribution, and involvement in associative and nonassociative forms of learning in Aplysia californica. Aplysia has only one HCN gene, which codes for a channel that has many similarities to the mammalian HCN channel. The cloned acHCN gene was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, which displayed a hyperpolarization-induced inward current that was enhanced by cGMP as well as cAMP. Similarly to its homologs in other animals, acHCN is permeable to K⁺ and Na⁺ ions, and is selectively blocked by Cs⁺ and ZD7288. We found that acHCN is predominantly expressed in inter- and motor neurons, including LFS siphon motor neurons, and therefore tested whether HCN channels are involved in simple forms of learning of the siphon-withdrawal reflex in a semiintact preparation. ZD7288 (100 μM) significantly reduced an associative form of learning (classical conditioning) but had no effect on two nonassociative forms of learning (intermediate-term sensitization and unpaired training) or baseline responses. The HCN current is enhanced by nitric oxide (NO), which may explain the postsynaptic role of NO during conditioning. HCN current in turn enhances the NMDA-like current in the motor neurons, suggesting that HCN channels contribute to conditioning through this pathway.Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN), cation nonselective ion channels generate hyperpolarization-activated inward currents (I_h) and thus tend to stabilize membrane potential (1–3). In addition, binding of cyclic nucleotides (cAMP and cGMP) to the C-terminal cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CNBD) enhances I_h and thus couples membrane excitability with intracellular signaling pathways (2, 4). HCN channels are widely important for numerous systemic functions such as hormonal regulation, heart contractility, epilepsy, pain, central pattern generation, sensory perception (4–15), and learning and memory (16–24).However, in previous studies it has been difficult to relate the cellular effects of HCN channels directly to their behavioral effects, because of the immense complexity of the mammalian brain. We have therefore investigated the role of HCN channels in Aplysia, which has a numerically simpler nervous system (25). We first identified and characterized an HCN gene in Aplysia, and showed that it codes for a channel that has many similarities to the mammalian HCN channel. We found that the Aplysia HCN channel is predominantly expressed in motor neurons including LFS neurons in the siphon withdrawal reflex circuit (26, 27). We therefore investigated simple forms of learning of that reflex in a semiintact preparation (28–30) and found that HCN current is involved in classical conditioning and enhances the NMDA-like current in the motor neurons. These results provide a direct connection between HCN channels and behavioral learning and suggest a postsynaptic mechanism of that effect. HCN current in turn is enhanced by nitric oxide (NO), a transmitter of facilitatory interneurons, and thus may contribute to the postsynaptic role of NO during conditioning.