Emerging causes of iron deficiency anemia refractory to oral iron supplementation

While oral iron supplementation is commonly used throughout many clinical setting,treatment with intravenous(IV) iron has historically been reserved for specific settings,such as chronic kidney disease,gynecologic issues,and anemia associated with cancer and its treatments.However,the use of IV iron has begun to gain popularity in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia(IDA) associated with two conditions that are being seen more frequently than in years past:patients who are status post gastric bypass procedure and those with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD).The Roux-en-Y procedure involves connecting a gastric pouch to the jejunum,creating a blind loop consisting of distal stomach,duodenum,and proximal jejunum that connects to the Roux limb to form a common tract.IDA occurs in 6%-50% of patients who have undergone a gastric bypass,the etiology being multifactorial.The proximal gastric pouch,the primary site of gastric acid secretion,is bypassed,resulting in a decreased ability to metabolize molecular iron.Once metabolized,most iron is absorbed in the duodenum,which is entirely bypassed.After undergoing bypass procedures,most patients significantly limit their intake of red meat,another factor contributing to post-bypass IDA.Chronic anemia occurs in approximately 1/3 of patients who suffer from IBD,and almost half of all IBD patients are iron deficient.IBD leads to IDA through multiple mechanisms,including chronic intestinal blood loss,decreased absorption capabilities of the duodenum secondary to inflammation,and an inability of many IBD patients to tolerate the side effects of oral ferrous sulfate.In this study,we reviewed the charts of all patients who received IV iron at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Hospital Clinic from January 2007 to May 2012.The most common indications for IV iron were for issues related to cancer and its treatment(21.9%),IBD(20.1%),and gastric bypass(15.0%).Of the 262 patients who received IV iron,230 received iron sucrose and 36 received iron dextran.While doses of 100,200,300,and 400 mg of iron sucrose were given,100 and 200 mg were by far the most common dosages used,122 and 120 times,respectively.The number of dosages of iron sucrose given ranged from 1 to 46,with a mean of 5.5 and a median of 4 doses.The average dose of iron dextran given was 870.5 mg,with 1000 mg being the most common dosage used.Most patients(22 of 36) who received iron dextran only received one dose.While patients with traditional indications for IV iron,such as gynecologic issues and kidney disease,still were represented in this study,we expect to see a continued increase in physicians using IV iron for emerging gastrointestinal indications,especially considering the increased safety of new low-molecular formulations.     

Intravenous iron sucrose versus oral iron supplementation for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease--a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study

OBJECTIVES: Anemia is a frequent complication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The optimal route for iron supplementation to replenish iron stores has not been determined so far. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose as compared with oral iron sulfate for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in patients with IBD. METHODS: A randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter study was performed in 46 patients with anemia and transferrin saturation 相似文献   

Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency anemia in patients with IBD

Anemia is the most prevalent extraintestinal complication of IBD. It can affect quality of life and ability to work, and can also increase the hospitalization rate in patients with IBD. Although the causes of anemia in IBD are multifactorial, iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common. Assessment of the iron status of patients who have a condition associated with inflammation, such as IBD, by using common biochemical values is insufficient. However, new indices of iron metabolism (for instance ferritin:transferrin receptor ratio, reticulocyte hemoglobin content or percentage of hypochromic red blood cells) may help to improve the assessment of iron status in patients with IBD. The treatment of IDA traditionally involves oral iron supplementation. However, because of extensive gastrointestinal adverse effects, and data showing that the use of oral iron in IBD may be associated with disease exacerbation, current guidelines suggest that iron supplementation in IBD should be administered intravenously. This Review provides an overview of iron homeostasis in health before discussing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for IDA in patients with IBD.     

Management of Anemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)

Purpose of Review

Anemia is the most common complication as well as an extra intestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is associated with a significant impact on patient’s quality of life (QoL); as well it represents a common cause of frequent hospitalization, delay of hospital inpatient discharge and overall increased healthcare burden. In spite of all these, anemia is still often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Our aim in this review is to provide a pathway for physicians to help them achieve early diagnosis as well as timely and appropriate treatment of anemia which in turn would hopefully reduce the prevalence and subsequent complications of this condition among IBD patients.

Recent Findings

The etiology of anemia among IBD patients is most commonly due to iron deficiency anemia (IDA) followed by anemia of chronic disease. Despite this, more than a third of anemic ulcerative colitis (UC) patients are not tested for IDA and among those tested and diagnosed with IDA, a quarter are not treated with iron replacement therapy. A new algorithm has been validated to predict who will develop moderate to severe anemia at the time of UC diagnosis. While oral iron is effective for the treatment of mild iron deficiency-related anemia, the absorption of iron is influenced by chronic inflammatory states as a consequence of the presence of elevated levels of hepcidin. Also, it is important to recognize that ferritin is elevated in chronic inflammatory states and among patients with active IBD, ferritin levels less than 100 are considered to be diagnostic of iron deficiency. Newer formulations of intra-venous (IV) iron have a good safety profile and can be used for replenishment of iron stores and prevention of iron deficiency in the future.

Summary

Routine screening for anemia is important among patients with IBD. The cornerstone for the accurate management of anemia in IBD patients lies in accurately diagnosing the type of anemia. All IBD patients with IDA should be considered appropriate for therapy with iron supplementation whereas IV administration of iron is recommended in patients with clinically active IBD, or for patients who are previously intolerant to oral iron, with hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL, and in patients who need erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). As the recurrence of anemia is common after resolution, the monitoring for recurrent anemia is equally important during the course of therapy.

     

The role of iron repletion in adult iron deficiency anemia and other diseases

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most prevalent and treatable form of anemia worldwide. The clinical management of patients with IDA requires a comprehensive understanding of the many etiologies that can lead to iron deficiency including pregnancy, blood loss, renal disease, heavy menstrual bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, bariatric surgery, or extremely rare genetic disorders. The treatment landscape for many causes of IDA is currently shifting toward more abundant use of intravenous (IV) iron due to its effectiveness and improved formulations that decrease the likelihood of adverse effects. IV iron has found applications beyond treatment of IDA, and there is accruing data about its efficacy in patients with heart failure, restless leg syndrome, fatigue, and prevention of acute mountain sickness. This review provides a framework to diagnose, manage, and treat patients presenting with IDA and discusses other conditions that benefit from iron supplementation.     

Treatment of iron deficiency anemia associated with gastrointestinal tract diseases

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a common site of bleeding that may lead to iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Treatment of IDA depends on severity and acuity of patients’ signs and symptoms. While red blood cell transfusions may be required in hemodynamically unstable patients, transfusions should be avoided in chronically anemic patients due to their potential side effects and cost. Iron studies need to be performed after episodes of GI bleeding and stores need to be replenished before anemia develops. Oral ...     

Iron replacement therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients with iron deficiency anemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsIron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common problem in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The aim was to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV) versus oral (PO) iron replacement in adult IBD with iron deficiency anemia (IDA).MethodsA systematic search for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of IV versus PO iron therapy in the treatment of IDA in adult IBD patients. The primary outcome was the mean change in the hemoglobin at the end of study and secondary outcomes include mean change in ferritin, clinical disease activity index, quality of life score and the adverse reaction rate.ResultsThe search strategy identified 757 articles while only three industry-funded articles met the inclusion criteria for systematic review and meta-analysis. The total sample size was 333 patients with 203 patients receiving IV therapy. IV route was associated with a 6.8 g/L higher mean hemoglobin increment and 110 μg/L higher mean ferritin increment. The IBD activity index and Quality of Life scores were comparable between the two treatment groups. More adverse events were reported in the oral treatment group with the odds for discontinuation being 6.2 (CI 2.2, 17.1).ConclusionsIntravenous iron treatment is better tolerated and more effective than oral iron treatment in improving ferritin. The higher hemoglobin gain with the IV route was small and of uncertain clinical significance. The combined sample size of the included studies was small and further clinical trials are required.     

Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Opinion statement Anemia is a frequent extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that is commonly overlooked, despite its significant impact on quality of life. Characteristic symptoms include chronic fatigue, headache, and subtle impairment of cognitive function, although some less common symptoms include dyspnea, dizziness, pica, angular stomatitis, shortened attention span, and esophageal webs. Several types of anemia are associated with IBD, but iron deficiency anemia (IDA) accounts for the majority of cases and others include anemia of chronic disease, anemia associated with vitamin deficiency (vitamin B₁₂ and folate), autoimmune anemia, and anemia caused by medication used to treat IBD. The diagnosis of IDA relies on laboratory blood tests. Therefore, these tests should be obtained on a regular basis because characteristic symptoms may be absent or not readily recognized by patients and their clinicians. Complete blood count may suffice; however, iron studies and serum vitamin levels may be necessary to differentiate between specific types of anemia. During the diagnostic process, it is important to consider coexistence of different types of anemia, especially if no response to therapy is noted. The therapy for anemia is directed towards treatment of the underlying inflammatory process and supplemental therapy, depending on the type of deficiency. Iron deficiency anemia is treated with iron preparations, first orally, and if unresponsive or if associated with untoward adverse events leading to decrease in adherence with the therapeutic regimen, with intravenous preparations. Intramuscular therapy has been abandoned due to high rate of complications. Intravenous therapy may be administered as a multiple-dose regimen (intravenous iron sucrose and gluconate) or as a single intravenous dose (iron dextran), which is associated with a higher risk of allergic infusion reactions and requires obligatory test dose administration. Treatment with erythropoietin is reserved for a select subgroup of patients with anemia of chronic disease. With appropriate treatment, the majority of patients with IBD will have significant improvement or resolution of anemia, which can lead to a better quality of life. However, a high index of suspicion should be maintained in order to identify the precise cause of anemia and to prescribe the appropriate therapy.     

Iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Anemia is a common extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) and is frequently overlooked as a complication. Patients with IBD are commonly found to have iron deficiency anemia(IDA) secondary to chronic blood loss, and impaired iron absorption due to tissue inflammation. Patients with iron deficiency may not always manifest with signs and symptoms; so, hemoglobin levels in patients with IBD must be regularly monitored for earlier detection of anemia. IDA in IBD is associated with poor quality of life, necessitating prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment. IDA is often associated with inflammation in patients with IBD. Thus, commonly used labora-tory parameters are inadequate to diagnose IDA, and newer iron indices, such as reticulocyte hemoglobin content or percentage of hypochromic red cells or zinc protoporphyrin, are required to differentiate IDA from anemia of chronic disease. Oral iron preparations are available and are used in patients with mild disease activity. These preparations are inexpensive and con-venient, but can produce gastrointestinal side effects, such as abdominal pain and diarrhea, that limit their use and patient compliance. These preparations are partly absorbed due to inflammation. Non-absorbed iron can be toxic and worsen IBD disease activity. Although cost-effective intravenous iron formulations are widely available and have improved safety profiles, physicians are reluctant to use them. We present a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of IDA in IBD, improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, efficacy, and safety of iron replacement in IBD.     

Common misconceptions in the diagnosis and management of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Anemia is the most common systemic complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); so common that it is almost invariably not investigated and rarely treated. Several misconceptions are the reason for these clinical errors, and our goal will be to review them. The most common misconceptions are: anemia is uncommon in IBD; iron deficiency is also uncommon; just by treating the intestinal disease, anemia will be corrected; iron deficiency is the only cause for anemia in IBD; ferritin is an accurate parameter for the diagnosis of iron deficiency in IBD; the impact of anemia on the quality of life of IBD patients is limited; iron supplementation is rarely needed in IBD; high-dose oral iron solves the problem of iron malabsorption in IBD; intravenous (IV) iron is dangerous and of no proven benefit in IBD; IV iron is useful only for severe anemia; and erythropoietin has no role in the treatment of IBD anemia. These misconceptions are not evidence-based. On the contrary, there is enough evidence to support the following statements: (a) anemia is very common in IBD, (b) anemia should be investigated with care because many factors can be responsible, (c) treatment of anemia results in clear improvement in the objective parameters of well-being, especially in the quality of life, (d) IV iron is safe and effective in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in IBD patients, and (e) erythropoietin is useful in a subset of patients with refractory anemia. Anemia diagnosis and treatment must not be neglected in IBD patients, and several misconceptions should be promptly abandoned.     

A study for the evaluation of safety and tolerability of intravenous high-dose iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding

INTRODUCTION: The provision of adequate iron to support erythropoiesis in iron deficient patients is a time-consuming process which may present compliance problems for patients in the outpatient setting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous high-dose iron sucrose therapy specifically in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) due to gastrointestinal blood loss. METHODS: A single dose of iron sucrose of 7 mg iron/kg body weight (not exceeding 500 mg) was infused over 3.5 hours in 31 consecutive patients with IDA due to gastrointestinal blood loss. Safety and tolerability of the therapy was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events under therapy and up to one week after completion of the study. Further examinations comprised vital parameters, ECG, and clinical chemistry including iron indices. RESULTS: A total of 14 adverse events were observed in 10 patients, of which two adverse events in two patients were considered as being definitely related to drug administration. None of the patients had to be withdrawn from therapy. Significant changes in vital parameters and ECG during therapy and follow-up were not observed and clinical chemistry remained unchanged. DISCUSSION: A single intravenous high-dose iron sucrose therapy in patients with IDA due to gastrointestinal blood loss appears to be safe and therefore is a therapeutic option which may save time and improve patient compliance.     

炎症性肠病并发缺铁性贫血的诊治

贫血是炎症性肠病(IBD)患者常见的肠外并发症之一,会导致生活质量下降,也可增加患者的住院频率。据报道IBD并发贫血的发病率为6%～74%[1]。尽管在IBD患者中导致贫血是多因素的,但缺铁性贫血(IDA)是最常见的[2]。本文就近年来有关IBD合并缺铁性贫血的诊断及治疗研究作一概述。     

Intravenous iron in inflammatory bowel disease

The prevalence of anemia across studies on patients with inflammatory bowel disease （IBD） is high （30%）. Both iron deficiency （ID） and anemia of chronic disease contribute most to the development of anemia in IBD. The prevalence of ID is even higher （45%）. Anemia and ID negatively impact the patient＇s quality of life. Therefore, together with an adequate control of disease activity, iron replacement therapy should start as soon as anemia or ID is detected to attain a normal hemoglobin （Hb） and iron status. Many patients will respond to oral iron, but compliance may be poor, whereas intravenous （IV） compounds are safe, provide a faster Hb increase and iron store repletion, and presents a lower rate of treatment discontinuation. Absolute indications for IV iron treatment should include severe anemia, intolerance or inappropriate response to oral iron, severe intestinal disease activity, or use of an erythropoietic stimulating agent. Four different products are principally used in clinical practice, which differ in their pharmacokinetic properties and safety profiles： iron gluconate and iron sucrose （lower single doses）, and iron dextran and ferric carboxymaltose （higher single doses）. After the initial resolution of anemia and the repletion of iron stores, the patient＇s hematological and iron parameters should be carefully and periodically monitored, and maintenance iron treatment should be provided as required. New IV preparations that allow for giving 1000-1500 mg in a single session, thus facilitating patient management,provide an excellent tool to prevent or treat anemia and ID in this patient population, which in turn avoids allogeneic blood transfusion and improves their quality of life.     

Reticulocyte hemoglobin content (MCHr) in the assessment of iron deficient erythropoiesis in inflammatory bowel disease

BackgroundIn conditions associated with inflammation, biochemical parameters alone could be inadequate for assessing iron status. We investigated the potential utility of mean reticulocyte hemoglobin content (MCHr) in the assessment of the erythropoiesis status in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).MethodsWe recruited 124 anemic outpatients with IBD. Serum iron, transferrin and ferritin were tested. Complete blood counts were performed on a CELL-DYN Sapphire analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics).Differences among groups were assessed using analysis of variance, considering P < 0.05 to be significant.Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of MCHr for detecting iron deficient erythropoiesis.The reference used as an indicator of insufficient iron availability was transferrin saturation <20%.ResultsOverall, 47.6% of the patients had iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and 31.5% anemia of chronic disease (ACD), while the others (20.9%) had mixed anemia.Patients with ACD or mixed anemia showed functional iron deficiency: normal or high ferritin and low MCHr. The area under curve was 0.858 (95% CI 0.742–0.942), considering a cut off 30.3 pg, the sensitivity was 82.2%, specificity 83.3%.ConclusionsMCHr provides information on iron availability in IBD patients. It is a reliable test to assess iron supply for erythropoiesis.     

Management of iron-deficiency anemia following acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A narrative analysis and review

Many patients experiencing acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) require iron supplementation to treat subsequent iron deficiency (ID) or iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). Guidelines regarding management of these patients are lacking. We aimed to identify areas of unmet need in patients with ID/IDA following acute GIB in terms of patient management and physician guidance. We formed an international working group of gastroenterologists to conduct a narrative review based on PubMed and EMBASE database searches (from January 2000 to February 2021), integrated with observations from our own clinical experience. Published data on this subject are limited and disparate, and those relating to post-discharge outcomes, such as persistent anemia and re-hospitalization, are particularly lacking. Often, there is no post-discharge follow-up of these patients by a gastroenterologist. Acute GIB-related ID/IDA, however, is a prevalent condition both at the time of hospital admission and at hospital discharge and is likely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Despite limited data, there appears to be notable variation in the prescribing of intravenous (IV)/oral iron regimens. There is also some evidence suggesting that, compared with oral iron, IV iron may restore iron levels faster following acute GIB, have a better tolerability profile, and be more beneficial in terms of quality of life. Gaps in patient care exist in the management of acute GIB-related ID/IDA, yet further data from large population-based studies are needed to confirm this. We advocate the formulation of evidence-based guidance on the use of iron therapies in these patients, aiding a more standardized best-practice approach to patient care.     

Safety and efficacy of rapid (1,000 mg in 1 hr) intravenous iron dextran for treatment of maternal iron deficient anemia of pregnancy

Maternal iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is associated with risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Oral iron is recommended to reverse anemia, but has gastrointestinal toxicity and frequent non‐adherence. Intravenous (IV) iron is reserved for intolerance of, or unresponsiveness to, oral therapy, malabsorption, and severe anemia (1% with hemoglobin [Hgb] levels <7 g/dL). With rare (<100 per one million) adverse events (AEs) ability to infuse a sufficient dose of low molecular weight iron dextran (LMWID) over 60 min, LMWID is an attractive option. This study demonstrated safety and efficacy of rapid IV infusion of 1,000 mg LMWID to gravidas with moderate to severe IDA. An observational treatment study of 1,000 mg LMWID administered over 1 hr for IDA in 189 consecutive, unselected second and third trimester gravidas after oral iron failure was conducted. All received a test dose of 25 mg LMWID and were monitored for AEs during the 60‐min infusion. No premedication was administered unless more than one drug allergy or asthma was present in which case IV methylprednisolone was administered. All were followed through pregnancy and delivery. Monitored parameters included Hgb, mean corpuscular volume, serum ferritin, and percent transferrin saturation. About 189 subjects received 1,000 mg LMWID. No serious AEs occurred. About 2% experienced transient infusion reactions. Hgb improved by 1–1.9 g/dL in 82% and ≥2 g/dL in 24%. Second trimester treatment was not associated with greater Hgb improvement than third trimester treatment. Anemia resolved in 95%. Administration of a single large dose of IV LMWID was effective, safe, and convenient. Am. J. Hematol. 91:590–593, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

High-dose fast infusion of parenteral iron isomaltoside is efficacious in inflammatory bowel disease patients with iron-deficiency anaemia without profound changes in phosphate or fibroblast growth factor 23

Objective: Iron isomaltoside (Monofer^®) is a high-dose intravenous iron preparation with good tolerability and efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). This trial evaluates the safety and efficacy, including effect on intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (iFGF23) of a high single dose and cumulative doses of iron isomaltoside in IBD patients with IDA.

Materials and methods: The trial was a prospective, open-label, multi-centre trial conducted in IBD patients with IDA. Based upon haemoglobin (Hb) levels at baseline and weight, the patients received 1500, 2000, 2500 or 3000?mg of iron isomaltoside infused in single doses up to 2000?mg. The outcome measurements included adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and changes in haematology and biochemistry parameters.

Results: Twenty-one IBD patients with IDA were enrolled, receiving 1500 (seven patients), 2000 (eight patients), 2500?mg (four patients) or 3000 (two patients) mg of iron. No serious ADRs were observed. Four patients experienced nine mild to moderate ADRs (hypersensitivity, pyrexia, vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, dyspepsia (two events) and eye allergy (two events)). In total, 15 (75%) patients had an increase in Hb of ≥2.0?g/dL during the trial, with normalisation of ferritin. No changes in iFGF23 or clinically significant hypophosphataemia were found.

Conclusion: Rapid infusions of high-dose iron isomaltoside, administered as single doses up to 2000?mg and cumulative doses up to 3000?mg, were without safety concerns and were efficacious in increasing Hb levels in IBD patients. Iron isomaltoside did not induce profound phosphate wasting via increased iFGF23 levels.     

High serum transferrin receptor level in anemia of chronic disorders indicates coexistent iron deficiency

Blood transferrin receptor (TR) level is largely determined by the quantum of erythropoiesis and by intracellular iron content of the cells of the erythroid lineage. Hence, a high serum TR level has been found to be useful in distinguishing iron deficiency anemia (IDA) from anemia of chronic disorders (ACD). In order to examine its potential role in the diagnosis of concomitant iron deficiency in ACD, we determined serum TR levels in 130 cases of ACD, in 25 cases of IDA, and in 40 normal adults. As expected, all patients of IDA had significantly higher serum TR levels compared to the normal subjects (4.2-19.2 microg/dL vs. 1.3-3.0 microg/dL) (P < 0.002). In 11/25 cases of IDA, the total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) was in the normal range although bone marrow iron store was absent and serum TR levels were high, thereby highlighting the superiority of TR level in the diagnosis of iron deficiency compared to TIBC. Although 54% (70/130) patients of ACD had normal or low serum TR levels (0.9-3.0 microg/dL) as expected, in 46% (60/130) of ACD patients, serum TR levels were high (3.2-11.0 microg/dL). Mean corpuscular volume, red cell distribution width, and transferrin saturation were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the latter group of patients compared to the former, and these parameters resembled those in IDA patients. Also, serum iron was lower and TIBC was higher in this group of ACD patients compared to those with normal or low serum TR. All these features point to an "IDA-like" profile of ACD patients with high TR and support the possibility of co-existent iron deficiency in this subgroup of ACD patients. In light of these observations it would be prudent to treat ACD patients with high serum TR levels with iron replacement therapy.     

Diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia in the elderly by transferrin receptor-ferritin index

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in the elderly is difficult because of the prevalence of chronic diseases, which can cause anemia with high ferritin levels, even in the presence of iron deficiency. Therefore, we studied the sensitivity and specificity of a serum transferrin receptor assay, which is not affected by chronic diseases, in the diagnosis of IDA in elderly patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective controlled study of 49 consecutive male and female patients older than 80 years who were admitted to an acute geriatric department. Bone marrow aspirate confirmed IDA in all 49 patients. Fourteen additional patients, also older than 80 years, with anemia but without evidence of iron deficiency on results of bone marrow examination, served as a control group. All patients underwent evaluation by means of a detailed medical history and results of complete physical examination, routine blood tests, and specific tests for diagnosis and evaluation of anemia. Examination of bone marrow aspirate was performed for all patients. Levels of transferrin receptor in serum were determined by means of a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The transferrin receptor-ferritin index (TR-F index) was defined as the ratio of serum transferrin receptor level to log ferritin level. RESULTS: Only 8 patients could be diagnosed as having IDA by means of routine blood test results (serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation levels). In contrast, the TR-F index disclosed IDA in 43 of the 49 patients, thus increasing the sensitivity from 16% to 88%. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of IDA in the elderly by means of routine blood tests has a very low sensitivity. The TR-F index is much more sensitive, and when results are positive, the TR-F index can eliminate the need for bone marrow examination.     

A Phase III,randomized, open‐label trial of ferumoxytol compared with iron sucrose for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common form of anemia worldwide. Although oral iron is used as first‐line treatment, many patients are unresponsive to or cannot take oral iron. This Phase III, open‐label, non‐inferiority study compared the efficacy and safety of ferumoxytol, a rapid, injectable intravenous (IV) iron product with low immunological reactivity and minimal detectable free iron, with IV iron sucrose in adults with IDA of any cause. Patients (N = 605) were randomized 2:1 to receive ferumoxytol (n = 406, two doses of 510 mg 5 ± 3 days apart) or iron sucrose (n = 199, five doses of 200 mg on five nonconsecutive days over 14 days) and followed for 5 weeks. Ferumoxytol demonstrated noninferiority to iron sucrose at the primary endpoint, the proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin increase of ≥2 g dL^?1 at any time from Baseline to Week 5 (ferumoxytol, 84.0% [n = 406] vs. iron sucrose, 81.4% [n = 199]), with a noninferiority margin of 15%. Ferumoxytol was superior to iron sucrose (2.7 g dL^?1 vs. 2.4 g dL^?1) in the mean change in hemoglobin from Baseline to Week 5 (the alternative preplanned primary endpoint) with P = 0.0124. Transferrin saturation, quality‐of‐life measures, and safety outcomes were similar between the two treatment groups. Overall, ferumoxytol demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to iron sucrose, suggesting that ferumoxytol may be a useful treatment option for patients with IDA in whom oral iron was unsatisfactory or could not be used. Am. J. Hematol. 89:646–650, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.