Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative analgesia after hysterectomy

The analgesic efficacy and side-effects of combined epidural infusion of bupivacaine and morphine, in comparison with these drugs alone, for postoperative analgesia after hysterectomy (60 patients) were evaluated. Before general anaesthesia, all patients had an epidural catheter placed (Th11-12) and 20 ml of 0.5%, bupivacaine was injected. In random order, epidural infusion was continued for 24 h with either 0.25% bupivacaine 4 ml.h-1 (BUPI-group), a bolus of 2 mg of morphine followed by morphine 0.2 mg.h-1 (MO-group), or a combination of the two drugs (COMB-group). A urinary bladder catheter was kept for 24 h. Supplementary postoperative pain medications were i.m. morphine 0.1 mg.kg-1 or rectal indomethacin 50 mg, on request. Immediately after awakening from general anaesthesia and transfer to the recovery room, 18/20 of the BUPI-group patients, 17/20 of the MO-group patients and 19/20 of the COMB-group patients were pain-free. In the postoperative evening and the first postoperative morning, the corresponding figures were 7/20 and 10/20 in the BUPI-group, 15/20 and 15/20 in the MO-group, and 18/20 and 15/20 in the COMB-group (postop, evening; P less than 0.01 BUPI vs. others). The number of patients requiring supplementary analgesics (morphine and indomethacin during the first 24 h was greatest in the BUPI-group P less than 0.01). The number of patients who vomited during the 24-h period was 3 in the BUPI-group, 9 in the MO-group and 5 in the COMB-group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pre-incisional epidural ketamine, morphine and bupivacaine combined with epidural and general anaesthesia provides pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA) receptor antagonists provide a pre-emptive analgesic effect in humans. This study investigated the benefits of pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery, using pre-incisional epidural ketamine + morphine + bupivacaine (K+M+B) treatment for achieving postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Sixty ASA 1-2 patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery were allocated to three groups in a randomized, single-blinded study. Patients in the control group (I) received general anaesthesia followed by an infusion of normal saline. Group II and III patients received general anaesthesia with a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine. Thirty minutes after the incision in groups I and II, an epidural pain control regimen was administered using ketamine (10 mg) and morphine (1 mg) in 10 ml of 0.085% bupivacaine (K+M+B). Group III patients also received K+M+B, but it was administered 10 min after the 2% lidocaine injection and 30 min before skin incision. All patients received an epidural pain control regimen (q12 h) for 3 days after their first injection. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine was used to control subsequent postoperative pain. During the 3-day period following surgery, duration to PCA trigger (h), morphine consumption (mg), pain intensity at rest and when coughing/moving, and analgesic-related adverse effects were recorded. The VAS scale (0-10) was used to assess pain intensity. RESULTS: Median times to first PCA trigger were 1.2 (0.5-2.0) h, 3.0 (0.7-4.2) h, and 4.0 (2.5-7.5) h for groups I, II, and III, respectively. Both the incident and resting pain scores were consistently lower for group III patients than groups I and II. The number of PCA triggers (all attempts/successful triggers) during the day following surgery were 14.0 (3-30)/8.0 (3-24) times, 10.0 (3-23)/6.0 (2-20) times, and 7.0 (3-12)/4.5 (1-10) times for groups I, II, and III. Total morphine consumption for the 3-day observation period was 12.5 (3-42) mg, 10.5 (2-29) mg, and 6.0 (1-20) for groups I, II, and III, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pre-incisional epidural K+M+B treatment combined with continuous epidural anaesthesia and general anaesthesia provides an ideal pre-emptive analgesic therapy, exhibiting better postoperative pain relief than general anaesthesia and post-incisional K+M+B treatment.     

Focus on mobilisation after lower abdominal surgery. A double-blind randomised comparison of epidural bupivacaine with morphine vs. lidocaine with morphine for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: Epidural infusion of morphine, usually with bupivacaine, for postoperative pain relief has proved to be safe and effective. Lidocaine with its short duration of action and low toxicity may be an alternative to bupivacaine. The clinical importance of the choice of local anaesthetic drug on mobilisation after lower abdominal surgery has not been studied previously. METHODS: A total of 52 patients was randomised to epidural infusion of morphine (1.6-4.4 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) with either lidocaine (0.44-0.98 mg.kg-1.h-1) or bupivacaine (0.10-0.28 mg.kg-1.h-1) in a double-blind fashion. The time to mobilisation, degree of pain relief, blood pressure, respiration and motor function were recorded at regular intervals postoperatively for 40 h. Serum concentrations of lidocaine, its main metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and bupivacaine were measured at 3, 15 and 40 h. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the two patient groups. There were no significant differences in the time from the end of surgery to the time the patients were able to stand without support (bupivacaine: median 24 h (interquartile range (IQR): 22-31), lidocaine: median 28 h (IQR 23-40), P = 0.15) or were able to walk without support (bupivacaine: median 46 h (IQR 28-62), lidocaine: median 48 h (IQR 35-54), P = 0.78). No significant differences between the groups were recorded with respect to pain relief, blood pressure, respiration, sedation score and motor function. The plasma concentration of lidocaine and bupivacaine increased significantly during the treatment period (P < 0.01 for both drugs), but not the concentration of MEGX. The highest venous lidocaine concentration was 17.5 mumol/l and the highest bupivacaine concentration was 18.8 mumol/l. There was a significant correlation between the concentration of both lidocaine and bupivacaine and the concentration of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) (lidocaine: r = 0.77, P < 0.001, bupivacaine: r = 0.60, P < 0.001), suggesting that the free fraction of the drugs did not increase. No patients showed serious signs of toxicity. The epidural infusion rates remained stable in both groups during the study period. CONCLUSION: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in the postoperative course after lower abdominal surgery in patients who received an epidural infusion of morphine combined with bupivacaine as compared to patients who received morphine with lidocaine. Further clinical studies to establish the place of lidocaine in postoperative epidural analgesia should be performed.     

Effect of epidural bupivacaine vs combined epidural bupivacaine and morphine on gastrointestinal function and pain after major gynaecological surgery

In a double-blind study, we investigated the effects of postoperativeepidural local anaesthetic, with or without addition of epiduralmorphine, on postoperative pain and gastrointestinal functionin patients scheduled for radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.Forty patients were randomized into two study groups: 48-h postoperativeepidural 0.2% bupivacaine 8 ml h^–1 (bupi group)or 48-h postoperative epidural 0.2% bupivacaine/morphine 50µg at 4 ml h^–1 (bupi/morph group). Patients wereobserved for at least 96 h after surgery. No differencesin pain at rest, during cough or mobilization were observed.Patients in the bupi group requested a significant greater amountof supplementary analgesics, but times to first flatus and defaecationwere reduced compared with patients in the bupi/morph group.Itching was a significant problem in patients in the bupi/morphgroup. No differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting,mobilization or time to discharge from hospital were observedbetween groups. The addition of morphine to postoperative epiduralbupivacaine has only limited effect on pain relief and increasestime to normalization of gastrointestinal function. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 727–32     

Epidural clonidine enhances postoperative analgesia from a combined low-dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine regimen.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the value of adding clonidine to a low-dose epidural regimen for postoperative pain treatment was assessed. Twenty-four patients scheduled for hysterectomy during combined thoracic epidural (bupivacaine and morphine) and general anesthesia were studied. Postoperative analgesia consisted of epidural bupivacaine (5 mg/h) and morphine (0.1 mg/h) for 12 h. In addition, the patients randomly received clonidine (75 micrograms), followed by an infusion of 18.75 micrograms/h or saline solution (placebo) epidurally. Pain was evaluated at rest, during cough, and during mobilization every hour. Sensory level of analgesia was evaluated by pinprick. We found no significant difference in pain scores at rest between the clonidine and placebo groups but an enhanced analgesic effect by clonidine during cough and mobilization (P less than 0.05). Arterial blood pressure decreased significantly during clonidine infusion and remained lower than in the control group throughout the study. We conclude that a continuous low-dose epidural clonidine infusion enhances analgesia from a combined low-dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine regimen after hysterectomy; however, the concomitant decrease in arterial blood pressure during epidural clonidine deserves further study before such a regimen can be recommended.     

Efficacy of a low-dose spinal morphine with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing hypospadias repair

Background:  Children undergoing hypospadias repair need to be protected from highly unpleasant sensory and emotional experiences during and after surgery. We designed a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled study to compare the efficacy of a low-dose (2 μg·kg⁻¹) of intrathecal morphine with placebo for postoperative pain control of children undergoing repair of hypospadias surgery with spinal anesthesia.
Methods:  Fifty-four children were randomly assigned to one of two spinal anesthesia groups. Group M ( n  = 27) received hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 2 μg·kg⁻¹ of preservative-free morphine and group P ( n  = 27) received hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.9% NaCl (placebo) under inhalation anesthesia. General anesthetics were discontinued subsequent to the block. The primary outcome was the presence of pain-requiring analgesics during the first 12 h after the spinal block. Side effects were also recorded. The analgesic effects were evaluated by using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale.
Results:  Forty-nine patients completed the trial. Fifteen patients (60%) in group P received supplementary analgesics within the first 12 h compared to only four patients (16.7%) in group M ( P  = 0.005). Mean duration of analgesia was 480 ± 209 and 720 ± 190 min in group P and group M respectively ( P  = 0.009). The groups were similar in postoperative side effects.
Conclusion:  Spinal anesthesia provided by hyperbaric bupivacaine is adequate for distal hypospadias repair in children, but adding 2 μg·kg⁻¹ intrathecal morphine provides better postoperative pain control when compared to placebo in these children.     

Intra-articular morphine and bupivacaine analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery

We assessed the effectiveness of intra-articular solutions of morphine, bupivacaine with adrenaline and a combination of both, compared with placebo in facilitating mobilisation and reducing postoperative pain and analgesic requirements for 24 h after operation. Forty patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery were studied in a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. All treatments proved more effective than placebo in facilitating earlier mobilisation and in decreasing postoperative pain as measured by visual analogue scale. Morphine alone provided the best analgesia and significantly decreased analgesic consumption for 24 h after surgery. We conclude that 1 mg of intra-articular morphine provides effective pain relief following arthroscopic knee surgery and that the addition of bupivacaine is of no benefit.     

盐酸帕洛诺司琼预防上腹部手术后硬膜外吗啡镇痛所致的恶心呕吐

目的 观察和评价帕洛诺司琼对上腹部手术后硬膜外吗啡镇痛引起的恶心呕吐的预防效果和安全性.方法 择期行上腹部手术并术后接受硬膜外吗啡镇痛患者60例,随机分为帕洛诺司琼组（P组）和托烷司琼组（T组）.手术结束前30 min,P组患者缓慢静注帕洛诺司琼0.25 mg,T组患者缓慢静注托烷司琼6 mg.观察记录两组患者术后24 h、48 h VAS及Ramsay评分、恶心呕吐的程度,计算恶心呕吐有效控制率.同时记录患者腹胀、头痛、椎体外系症状等不良反应.结果 两组患者术后24 h及48 h的VAS及Ramsay评分差异无统计学意义.P组患者术后24 h的恶心及呕吐有效控制率分别为80.0%和73.3%,T组分别为63.3%和60.0%;P组患者术后48 h的恶心及呕吐有效控制率分别为90.0%和93.3%,T组分别为66.6%和63.3%.两组患者术后24 h恶心、呕吐有效控制率差异无统计学意义.P组患者术后48 h恶心、呕吐有效控制率明显优于T组患者（P 〈 0.05）.帕洛诺司琼的不良反应主要为头痛.结论 腹部手术后24 h内,帕洛诺司琼预防吗啡硬膜外镇痛所致的恶心呕吐的效果与托烷司琼相当,但术后48 h预防恶心呕吐的效果优于托烷司琼,且不良反应发生率低,程度较轻,安全性好.     

Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of bupivacaine in postoperative epidural analgesia

We describe a method, which is both specific and rapid, for the measurement of bupivacaine concentrations in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography. Bupivacaine plasma concentrations, pharmacokinetics and protein binding in the postoperative period were investigated in seven patients (58-77 years old) following hip surgery. Postoperative analgesia was achieved by epidural bolus injections of 25 mg bupivacaine 0.25% every 6 h. Sufficient pain relief without side-effects was obtained. Total (maximum 1.13 micrograms/ml) as well as free (maximum 0.1 microgram/ml) bupivacaine plasma concentrations remained below toxic threshold levels and no cumulation occurred. Increased protein binding in the postoperative period is reported, emphasizing the importance of measuring the free fraction in addition to the total plasma concentration. The free fraction decreased from 5.4% preoperatively to 2.7% in the postoperative period (P less than 0.05). Changes in plasma protein binding of bupivacaine and changes in plasma levels of the acute phase reactant alpha-1-acid glycoprotein were correlated (r = 0.8, P less than 0.05). Difficulties in interpreting the elimination parameters following epidural administration are discussed, leading to the conclusion that the derivation of dosage regimens from kinetic parameters following epidural administration is not warranted.     

Immediate and prolonged effects of pre– versus postoperative epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and morphine on pain at rest and during mobilisation after total knee arthroplasty

Thirty–two patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive an identical epidural blockade initiated 30 min before surgical incision (N = 16), or at closure of the surgical wound (N=16). Before induction of general anaesthesia the epidural catheter was tested with bupivacaine 7.5 mg ml^-1, 2 ml. General anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone, pancuronium or atracurium, and fentanyl 0.1–0.3 mg, and maintained with N₂O/O₂ and enflurane. The epidural regimen consisted of a bolus of 16 ml of bupivacaine 7.5 mg ml^-1 plus morphine 2 mg, and continuous infusion of bupivacaine 1.25 mg ml^-1 plus morphine 0.05 mg–ml^-1, 4 mlh^-1 for the first 24 h, and bupivacaine 0.625 mg ml^-1 plus morphine 0.05 mg·ml^-1, 4 ml . h^-1, for the next 24 h after operation. Additional morphine 2.5–5 mg was administered i.v. or i.m. for the first 24 h postoperatively, and ketobemidone or morphine 5–10 mg orally or rectally from 24 h to 7 d postoperatively, on request. Paracetamol 1000 mg every 8 h was administered from 48 h to 7 days postoperatively. No significant differences were observed in request for additional opioids, or in pain scores at rest or during mobilisation of the operated limb, during or after cessation of the epidural regimen. These results do not suggest timing of analgesia with a conventional, continuous epidural regimen to be of major clinical importance in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.     

Pain relief by wound infiltration with bupivacaine or high-dose ropivacaine after inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Wound infiltration with bupivacaine is often used for pain relief after inguinal hernia surgery. We hypothesized that the lower systemic toxicity of another long-acting local anesthetic of similar potency (ropivacaine) would make it possible to increase the dose to above that recommended for bupivacaine and thereby achieve more effective pain control. METHODS: Elective unilateral open hernia repair was performed on 144 patients at 4 hospitals. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia and, in a double-blind manner, the operating field was infiltrated with 40 mL ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL (in = 73) or bupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL (n = 71 ) for postoperative pain relief. Pain at rest, on mobilization, and on coughing was assessed repeatedly during 24 hours using a visual analog scale. The patients' ability to walk and the need for supplementary analgesics were also recorded. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to pain scores, which the patients reported to be less than 15% (median) of the worst pain imaginable in all examinations performed at rest, or in the consumption of supplementary analgesics. Those who received ropivacaine could walk with no or only minor problems at an earlier stage than the bupivacaine patients (P < .03). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Wound infiltration with long-acting local anesthetics resulted in low pain scores after hernia surgery. Bupivacaine 100 mg was as effective as ropivacaine 300 mg.     

Thoracic epidural analgesia compared with patient controlled intravenous morphine after upper abdominal surgery

Twenty–one ASA I or II patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery were studied for 24 hours after operation. They were entered into a prospective, randomised study of patient–controlled intravenous morphine compared with continuous thoracic epidural fentanyl combined with 0.2% bupivacaine. Pain relief was superior in the bupivacaine series ( P < 0.05) throughout the 24 hour study period and this was associated with significantly greater pulmonary ventilation compared with the PCA series. Forced expiratory parameters were reduced in both series after the operation but significantly less so in the epidural group. There was a reduced incidence of emetic symptoms in the epidural group ( P < 0.05) but the incidence of other minor side effects did not differ significantly. Thoracic epidural fentanyl/bupivacaine results in significantly better analgesia than patient–controlled intravenous morphine.     

The usefulness of postoperative continuous epidural morphine in abdominal surgery

The influence of continuous epidural morphine on the recovery course of intestinal activity, urinary function, and ambulation after surgery was studied in 40 patients who underwent either gastrectomy for gastric cancer or cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. Compared with a control group of patients whose postoperative pain was managed by pentazocine or hydroxyzine as before, the length of time before passing flatus or faeces was significantly shortened in the morphine groups (P<0.05). Following gastrectomy, the urinary catheter was able to be removed significantly earlier in the morphine group (P<0.05) although there was no statistical difference between both cholecystectomy groups. The morphine group experienced no difficulty with postoperative ambulation and exercise, although the difference in time before ambulation between the two groups was not considered significant. The results of this study led us to conclude that the postoperative continuous epidural infusion of morphine would be more beneficial following major abdominal surgery than the conventionally used methods of administering postoperative analgesia.     

Effect of piroxicam in addition to continuous thoracic epidural bupivacaine and morphine on postoperative pain and lung function after thoracotomy

Twenty-eight patients scheduled for lung resection with lateral thoracotomy and postoperative chest drains during combined thoracic epidural bupivacaine plus morphine and general anaesthesia were studied. Postoperative pain treatment was continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% 5 ml h-1 plus morphine 0.2 mg h-1 for 48 h and, in addition, the patients received rectal piroxicam 40 mg randomly and double-blind 12 h and 1 h before surgery and 20 mg 24 h-1 postoperatively or placebo. Pain was evaluated at rest, during cough and mobilisation, together with pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC, PEFR) and sensory level of analgesia repeatedly for 48 h. The results showed efficient pain relief, but without differences in pain scores or need for supplementary analgesics between the two groups. Pulmonary function decreased similarly in the two groups. Thus we were unable to show enhanced analgesia by supplementing an otherwise effective low-dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine treatment with piroxicam after thoracic surgery with chest drains.     

Comparison of bupivacaine and fentanyl as an adjuvant of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia

We conducted a retrospective study to determine whether bupivacaine or fentanyl is a better adjuvant to epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia using 108 patients. Following epidural lidocaine anesthesia with or without light general anesthesia for major gynecological surgeries, 59 patients received epidural morphine (EPM) 2 mg (group M), 21 patients received morphine 2 mg plus 0.25% plain bupivacaine 6–10 ml epidurally (group B), and 28 patients received morphine 2 mg plus fentanyl 100 μg epidurally (group F). The analgesic interval, defined as the duration from EPM injection to the first request of analgesics for incisional pain, was significantly longer in group F than in group M (29±11vs 19±17 h,P<0.05), but similar to group B (22±14 h). Group F patients required the least amount of analgesics for incisional pain of the three groups during the first 24 h postoperatively (P<0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was similar among all three groups. In conclusion, fentanyl appears to be a better adjuvant to epidural morphine than bupivacaine.     

A comparison of single dose caudal tramadol, tramadol plus bupivacaine and bupivacaine administration for postoperative analgesia in children

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the effect of single dose caudal tramadol, tramadol plus bupivacaine and bupivacaine on the management of postoperative pain in children. METHODS: Sixty-three children in ASA groups I-II, between the ages of 1 and 5 were evaluated for postoperative pain randomly divided into three groups as follows: In group T, only tramadol was given caudally; in group TB, tramadol-bupivacaine was given caudally; in group B, bupivacaine was given alone. Pain was evaluated by using the paediatric objective pain scale (POPS). Sedation was evaluated with a 5-point test. There were no differences with age, weight, haemodynamic and respiratory parameters between groups. RESULTS: For 24 h postoperatively, the POPS value showed no statistically significant difference among groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative analgesia was maintained for 24 h. Nausea and vomiting was found to be higher in the tramadol group than in the bupivacaine group and tramadol-bupivacaine group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Tramadol used caudally is as effective as bupivacaine in the management of postoperative pain in children and the addition of tramadol to bupivacaine, when both drugs were administered caudally, did not prolong the duration of action of bupivacaine and is a safe agent in children.     

Comparison of ropivacaine-fentanyl patient-controlled epidural analgesia with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for perioperative analgesia and recovery after open colon surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of ropivacaine-fentanyl patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with morphine intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. SETTING: Five university-affiliated hospitals. PATIENTS: 41 patients undergoing colon surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either standardized combined epidural/general anesthesia followed by PCEA with ropivacaine 0.2% and fentanyl (2 microg/mL) or standardized general anesthesia followed by morphine IV PCA. All patients participated in a standardized postoperative clinical pathway. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Analgesia was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Postoperative recovery was assessed by completion of prospectively defined discharge milestones and time until discharge. Statistical analyses included nonparametric and contingency table analyses. The PCEA group had better analgesia (> 50% reduction in pain scores, assessed both at rest and during a cough) for the first 3 days after surgery (p < 0.0,005). The PCEA group achieved discharge milestones approximately 36 hours faster (p < 0.002), but time until discharge was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine-fentanyl PCEA provides superior analgesia, reduced opioid requirement, and more rapid recovery after colon surgery.     

Postoperative analgesia by combined continuous infusion and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) following hip replacement: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine is a new local anaesthetic, which compared to bupivacaine is less toxic and shows greater sensory and motor block dissociation. We hypothesised that treatment of postoperative pain with a combined regimen of continuous epidural infusion and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine could have given better results compared with those we had obtained using bupivacaine. METHODS: Patients undergoing total hip replacement were randomly assigned to two groups. They received epidural analgesia for postoperative pain treatment using ropivacaine, 2 mg x ml(-1) or bupivacaine 2 mg x ml(-1). Both drugs were administered as a constant infusion of 6 ml x h(-1) supplemented by PCEA bolus doses of 2 ml. Patients in both groups received morphine intravenously on demand from a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. An independent observer recorded pain scores, intensity of motor block and morphine consumption at regular intervals during the first 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were evaluated. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine, in similar amounts, provided similar results assessed as adequate to very good postoperative analgesia, whereas motor block was significantly more intense in patients treated with bupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar analgesic effects, epidural infusion of ropivacaine combined with PCEA provides higher patient satisfaction than equal doses of bupivacaine due to lack of motor block.     

Preoperative epidural fentanyl reduces postoperative pain after upper abdominal surgery

Forty patients, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1–2, undergoing subtotal gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. The patients were allocated to two groups with or (group P) and without (group C) preoperative epidural fentanyl 100 μg. Postoperatively, all patients received continuous infusion of the study solution, containing fentanyl 30 μg·ml⁻¹ and 2 mg/ml bupivacaine, at a rate of 0.7 ml·h⁻¹ for 72 h. The scores on the Prince Henry Hospital self-assessed pain scale (PHPS) were recorded at 0, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after the surgery. We compared the total rescue doses of analgesics during each period of 24 h until 72 h postoperatively. Although the total rescue doses of analgesics were not different between the groups, the median PHPS score was lower in group P than in group C, except at 0 h after the surgery. Preoperative epidural fentanyl 100 μg may increase the analgesic potency of postoperative epidural low-dose infusion of bupivacaine with fentanyl.