Eradication of H. influenzae in AECB: A pooled analysis of moxifloxacin phase III trials compared with macrolide agents

Haemophilus influenzae is the most common bacterial pathogen associated with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). This study determined the rate of bacterial eradication of H. influenzae during AECB treated with either macrolides or moxifloxacin. Adult AECB patients with H. influenzae were included in a pooled analysis of four double-blind, multicentre, randomised trials. Patients received either moxifloxacin (400 mg qd for 5-10 days) or macrolides (azithromycin 500 mg/250 mg qd for 5 days or clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 5-10 days). Bacterial eradication and clinical success were recorded at the test-of-cure visit (7-37 days post-therapy). Of 2555 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 910 were microbiologically valid and 292 (32%) had H. influenzae cultured at baseline. Bacterial eradication of H. influenzae was significantly higher with moxifloxacin vs. macrolide-treated patients (93.0% [133/143] vs. 73.2% [109/149], respectively, P = 0.001). Moxifloxacin also demonstrated higher eradication rates compared with azithromycin (96.8% vs. 84.6%, P = 0.019) and clarithromycin (90.1% vs. 64.2%, P = 0.001) analysed separately. Clinical success was 89.5% (128/143) for moxifloxacin vs. 85.2% (127/149) for the macrolide group (P = 0.278); similar results were found when moxifloxacin was compared individually with each macrolide. For patients with AECB due to H. influenzae, moxifloxacin provided superior bacterial eradication rates than macrolide therapy.     

Short-course moxifloxacin therapy for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group

Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations contribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to clarithromycin for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) using a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial. Between November 21, 1996 and April 7, 1998, 936 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) were enrolled at 56 centers across the United States of which 491 (52%) had ABECB (i.e. pretherapy pathogen). Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administer once daily, for either 5 or 10 days, or clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 10 days. For the purpose of study blinding, the patients taking moxifloxacin received placebo to maintain uniform dosing. The main outcome measures were bacteriological response at the end of therapy (post-therapy days 0-6) and follow-up (7-17 days post-therapy) visits, as well as overall clinical response, clinical response at the end of therapy and clinical response at follow-up. Two patient populations were analyzed: efficacy-valid (i.e., those with a pretherapy pathogen) and intent-to-treat (i.e., all subjects that took drug). In 420 efficacy valid patients with a pretherapy organism, overall clinical resolution was 89% for 5 days moxifloxacin vs. 91% for 10 day moxifloxacin vs. 91% for 10 day clarithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 94% and 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 10-day moxifloxacin, respectively, and 91% for the clarithromycin group. Eradication rates at follow-up were 89% and 91% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 10-day moxifloxacin respectively, and 85% for the clarithromycin group. Among 926 intent-to-treat patients (312 5-day moxifloxacin, 302 10-day moxifloxacin and 312 clarithromycin), drug-related events were reported for 26%, 30% and 35%, respectively. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily, as a 5 or 10 day regimen, was found to be clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to 10 day clarithromycin for the treatment of ABECB. Given its favorable safety and tolerability profile, moxifloxacin administered once daily for 5 days may be as effective and a more convenient treatment than a standard course of clarithromycin for patients with ABECB.     

Moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin against acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: the Latin American Cohort

We compared the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin for the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) using a prospective, randomized, double blind, parallel-group clinical trial design. A total of 563 patients with AECB were enrolled (437 efficacy-valid) at 34 centers in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Patients were randomized to oral therapy with either moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 days or levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 7 days. Clinical success was achieved in 201 out of 221 (91.0%) patients in the moxifloxacin group, and in 203 out of 216 (94.0%) in the levofloxacin group, indicating that moxifloxacin is equivalently effective to levofloxacin. Bacteriologic eradication or presumed eradication was also similar in the two treatment groups: 92.8% in the moxifloxacin group and 93.8% in the levofloxacin group. Nausea was the most common drug-related adverse event in each treatment group. The rate of discontinuation because of adverse events was very low (2%). In conclusion, a 5-day course of moxifloxacin is clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to a 7-day course of levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with AECB. The short treatment duration with moxifloxacin may have compliance advantages over other currently used therapies in the 'real-life' clinical setting.     

Telithromycin is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a short, 5-day course of telithromycin, a new ketolide antibacterial, compared with a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The study enrolled 325 adult patients with AECB and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients received either telithromycin 800 mg once daily (qd) for 5 days (followed by placebo for 5 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily (tid) for 10 days. Clinical cure rates for telithromycin post-therapy (Days 17-21, test-of-cure) and late post-therapy (Days 31-36) were 86.1 and 78.1%, respectively; 82.1 and 75.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate. Excellent clinical cure rates were also observed for high-risk patients. Bacteriologic outcome was satisfactory for 69.2% of telithromycin recipients vs 70.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate recipients. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, although the frequency of drug-related adverse events was almost two-fold higher for amoxicillin/clavulanate (25.0 vs. 13.1%). Thus, a 5-day course of telithromycin 800 mg qd is an effective and well-tolerated alternative to a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg tid for first-line empiric treatment of AECB in adults with COPD.     

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin vs levofloxacin in the outpatient treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of oral azithromycin and levofloxacin in the treatment of outpatients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, multicenter trial with 1:1 treatment allocation. SETTING: Outpatient treatment setting. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-five male or female outpatients between the ages of 35 and 75 years who had received a clinical diagnosis of ABECB. INTERVENTIONS: Blinded treatment with either oral azithromycin, 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg per day for days 2 to 5, or, oral levofloxacin, 500 mg q24h for 7 days. RESULTS: Both treatments were well-tolerated, with the majority of adverse events being GI in nature. Favorable clinical outcomes in clinically evaluable patients were demonstrated in 89% of patients receiving azithromycin and in 92% of patients receiving levofloxacin by day 4 of therapy. At day 24, the posttherapy visit, favorable responses were approximately 82% and 86%, respectively, for patients in the two treatment groups. The bacterial eradication rates of respiratory pathogens were 96% for azithromycin and 85% for levofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing concerns over macrolide resistance and a higher incidence of Gram-negative pathogens, a standard 5-day course of oral azithromycin was clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to a 7-day course of oral levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with ABECB.     

Short-term and long-term outcomes of moxifloxacin compared to standard antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of oral moxifloxacin with standard antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). DESIGN: Multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind study of two parallel treatment arms. PATIENTS: Outpatients >or= 45 years old with stable chronic bronchitis, smoking history of >or= 20 pack-years, two or more AECBs in the previous year, and FEV(1) < 85% of predicted value. Patients were enrolled when in a stable condition, and patients with exacerbations within 12 months of enrollment were randomized. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization (stratified on steroid use) between moxifloxacin (400 mg qd for 5 days) and standard therapy (amoxicillin [500 mg tid for 7 days], clarithromycin [500 mg bid for 7 days], or cefuroxime-axetil [250 mg bid for 7 days]). MEASUREMENTS: Assessment at enrollment, randomization (Anthonisen type 1 exacerbation), 7 to 10 days after treatment, and monthly until next AECB or up to 9 months. The primary efficacy variable was clinical success (sufficient improvement, no alternative antimicrobial therapy required) 7 to 10 days after therapy. Secondary predefined end points were clinical cure (return to pre-exacerbation status), further antimicrobial use, time to next AECB, and bacteriologic success. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-four patients received moxifloxacin, and 376 patients received standard therapy. At 7 to 10 days after therapy, clinical success rates were similar in intention-to-treat (ITT) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.7 to 9.5) and per-protocol (PP) patients (95% CI, - 3.0 to 8.5). Moxifloxacin showed superior clinical cure rates over standard therapy in both ITT patients (95% CI, 1.4 to 14.9) and PP patients (95% CI, 0.3 to 15.6), and higher bacteriologic success in microbiologically valid patients (95% CI, 0.4 to 22.1). Fewer ITT patients required antimicrobials after treatment with moxifloxacin than standard therapy (p < 0.01). Time to next exacerbation was longer with moxifloxacin; median and mean times to new AECBs in ITT patients who did not require any further antibiotics were 131.0 days and 132.8 days in moxifloxacin, and 103.5 days and 118.0 days in standard therapy, respectively (p = 0.03). The occurrence of failure, new exacerbation, or any further antibiotic was less frequent in moxifloxacin-treated patients for up to 5 months of follow-up (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin was equivalent to standard therapy for clinical success and showed superiority over standard therapy in clinical cure, bacteriologic eradication, and long-term outcomes.     

莫西沙星短程疗法对65岁以上AECOPD的近、远期疗效及安全性评价

目的评价莫西沙星短程疗法对65岁以上AECOPD的疗效和安全性。方法60例AECOPD（年龄≥65岁）随机分为两组，试验组（30例）给予莫西沙星0．4静滴，1次／d，疗程5d，对照组（30例）给予头孢哌酮舒巴坦3．0静滴，2次／d，和阿齐霉素0．5静滴，1次／d，疗程10天。结果治疗结束时试验组和对照组的临床有效率分别为93．33％和70．00％（P〈0．05），细菌学清除率分别为90．91％和75．00％（P〉0．05）；试验组和对照组不良反应发生率分别为10．00％和6．67％（P〉0．05）。结论莫西沙星短程疗法治疗AECOPD不仅起效快，近期疗效好，而且可以延长至下次急性发作时间的间期，减少1年内急性发作次数和使用其他抗生素的频率，可以作为AECOPD的一线治疗方案，在老年病人可安全使用。     

Five-day telithromycin once daily is as effective as 10-day clarithromycin twice daily for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and is associated with reduced health-care resource utilization

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate equivalence in the clinical efficacy of telithromycin vs clarithromycin treatment of outpatients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and to compare the tolerability and respiratory-related health-care resource utilization associated with these treatment regimens. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, clinical study was conducted at 105 centers in 14 countries. Adult outpatients (age > or = 30 years) received oral telithromycin, 800 mg qd for 5 days (n = 270), or oral clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 10 days (n = 282), for the treatment of AECB. Clinical and bacteriologic outcomes were assessed at the posttherapy/test-of-cure (TOC) visit (days 17 to 24; per-protocol population). Health-care resource utilization data were collected for each patient by investigators blinded to study medication up to the late posttherapy visit (days 31 to 36). RESULTS: Clinical cure rates at the posttherapy/TOC visit were comparable between the groups (telithromycin, 193 of 225 patients [85.8%]; clarithromycin, 206 of 231 patients [89.2%]); bacteriologic outcome was satisfactory for 59 of 72 telithromycin-treated patients (81.9%) vs 63 of 76 clarithromycin-treated patients (82.9%). Health-care resource utilization assessed up to the late posttherapy visit was lower in the telithromycin treatment group than the clarithromycin treatment group, with significantly fewer hospitalizations for respiratory-related causes (one hospitalization vs eight hospitalizations for a total of 4 inpatient days vs 39 inpatient days, respectively), significantly fewer AECB-related emergency department visits (0 vs 8), and fewer unscheduled outpatient visits (11 vs 18). Fewer telithromycin-treated patients reported days lost from work (21 of 91 patients [23.1%]; 133 days) compared with those receiving clarithromycin (30 of 98 patients [30.6%]; 141 days). Telithromycin was well tolerated; adverse events considered possibly related to study medication were reported by 61 of 269 patients (22.7%) and 100 of 280 patients (35.7%) receiving telithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 5-day telithromycin treatment was as effective and well tolerated as 10-day clarithromycin treatment for patients with AECB, and was associated with a reduced utilization of health-care resources.     

Clarithromycin extended-release tablet: a review of its use in the management of respiratory tract infections

Clarithromycin is an orally active, advanced-generation macrolide that has been reformulated as an extended-release tablet (Biaxin) XL Filmtab allowing convenient once-daily administration. The reformulation is intended to improve patient compliance and the tolerability of the drug. Although maximum plasma clarithromycin concentrations are lower and reached later with the extended-release tablets than with the immediate-release tablets, the two formulations are bioequivalent with respect to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Bioequivalence is also achieved between the formulations for the microbiologically active metabolite, 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin. Two randomized trials in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) showed that a 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical cure rates of 83% and 85% and bacteriologic cure rates of 86% and 92% at the test-of-cure study visit. Similar rates of cure were achieved with a 7-day course of twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release and with a 10-day course of twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.A 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical and bacteriologic cure rates of 88% and 86%, respectively, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Similar cure rates were achieved in recipients of once-daily levofloxacin in the same trial. In patients with acute maxillary sinusitis, a 14-day course of either once-daily clarithromycin extended-release or twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release produced statistically equivalent clinical cure rates of 85% and 79%, respectively. Both treatment groups achieved similar rates of radiographic success and resolution of sinusitis. Recent results indicate that clarithromycin extended-release 500 mg once daily for 5 days is also effective in the treatment of patients with streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and in the treatment of AECB. The most frequently reported drug-related events with clarithromycin extended-release were abnormal taste (7% incidence), diarrhea (6%) and nausea (3%). Most adverse drug reactions were of a mild and transient nature. In comparative clinical trials, clarithromycin extended-release had an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with the immediate-release formulation. In addition, clarithromycin extended-release was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and as well tolerated as levofloxacin. Further studies are required to assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of clarithromycin relative to comparator antibacterial agents. CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin extended-release is an effective treatment for AECB, CAP, acute maxillary sinusitis, and pharyngitis (although not approved for the latter in the US), and is administered in a convenient dosage regimen that has the potential to encourage good compliance. The reformulation modulates clarithromycin absorption kinetics thereby improving tolerability. Therefore, clarithromycin extended-release provides a useful option for the treatment of specific respiratory tract infections.     

Patient stratification in the management of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: the role of levofloxacin 750 mg.

This is the first prospective clinical trial in which patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis have been stratified by degree of underlying illness. Uncomplicated patients were randomised to levofloxacin 750 mg once daily (q.d.) for 3 days or azithromycin q.d. for 5 days. Complicated patients were randomised to levofloxacin 750 mg q.d. for 5 days or amoxicillin 875 mg/clavulanate 125 mg twice daily for 10 days. Regardless of therapy, complicated patients demonstrated lower clinical and microbiological success than uncomplicated patients. Clinical success for clinically evaluable patients was similar for levofloxacin and azithromycin (93.0 versus 90.1%, respectively), and levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate (79.2 versus 81.7%, respectively). For microbiologically evaluable patients, clinical response to levofloxacin for 3 days was superior to azithromycin for 5 days (96.3 versus 87.4%, respectively), and levofloxacin for 5 days was similar to amoxicillin/clavulanate for 10 days (81.4 versus 80.9%, respectively). Microbiological eradication was superior for levofloxacin for 3 days compared with azithromycin for 5 days (93.8 versus 82.8%, respectively), and similar for levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate for 10 days (81.4 versus 79.8%, respectively). In conclusion, levofloxacin 750 mg for 3 days was comparable to azithromycin for 5 days for uncomplicated patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, while 5 days of 750 mg levofloxacin was comparable to 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.     

Single-dose azithromycin microspheres vs clarithromycin extended release for the treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia in adults

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The inability or failure of many subjects to adhere to standard antibiotic regimens, which may last up to 10 days, results in suboptimal antibiotic treatment. Treatment with a single-dose antibiotic regimen may improve compliance with prescribed therapy. A novel microsphere formulation of azithromycin provides a single-dose regimen while maintaining tolerability. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a single 2.0-g dose of azithromycin microspheres to that of an extended-release formulation of clarithromycin (1.0 g/d for 7 days) for the treatment of adults with mild-to-moderate CAP. DESIGN: A phase III, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study, comparing single-dose azithromycin microspheres to extended-release clarithromycin, both administered orally. METHODS: Subjects with mild-to-moderate CAP (Fine class I and II) were included. The primary end point was clinical response at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (days 14 to 21) in the clinical per protocol (CPP) population. The bacteriologic response at the TOC visit was assessed in subjects with a baseline pathogen. RESULTS: A total of 501 subjects were randomized, and 499 were treated. Clinical cure rates at the TOC visit in the CPP population were 92.6% (187 of 202 subjects) for azithromycin microspheres and 94.7% (198 of 209 subjects) for extended-release clarithromycin. Overall pathogen eradication rates were 91.8% (123 of 134 subjects) for azithromycin microspheres and 90.5% (153 of 169 subjects) for extended-release clarithromycin. Both agents were well tolerated. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 26.3% with azithromycin microspheres and 24.6% with extended-release clarithromycin. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: A single 2.0-g dose of azithromycin microspheres was as effective and well tolerated as a 7-day course of extended-release clarithromycin in the treatment of adults with mild-to-moderate CAP.     

Clinical significance of the infection-free interval in the management of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Rational and appropriate antibiotic use for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) is a major concern, as approximately half of these patients do not have a bacterial infection. Typically, the result of antimicrobial therapy for patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) is not eradication of the pathogen but resolution of the acute symptoms. However, the length of time before the next bacterial exacerbation can be another important variable, as the frequency of exacerbations will affect the overall health of the patient and the rate of lung deterioration over time. Clinical trials comparing antimicrobial therapies commonly measure resolution of symptoms in AECB patients as the primary end point, regardless of whether the exacerbation is documented as bacterial in nature. Ideally, the scientific approach to assessing the efficacy of antibiotic therapy for ABECB should include a measurement of acute bacterial eradication rates in patients with documented bronchial bacterial infection followed by measurement of the infection-free interval (IFI), ie, the time to the next ABECB. The use of these variables can provide a standard for comparing various antimicrobial therapies. As we learn more about how antibiotics can affect the IFI, treatment decisions should be adapted to ensure optimal management of ABECB for the long-term.     

The efficacy and safety of a new ciprofloxacin suspension compared with co-amoxiclav tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

A multinational, multicentre, randomized, prospective, parallel-group study compared treatment with ciprofloxacin administered as an oral suspension (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) with co-amoxiclav tablets (625 mg three times daily for 7 days) in patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). A total of 147 of 165 cases treated with ciprofloxacin (89.1%) and 146 of 162 cases treated with co-amoxiclav (90.1%) were classified as being clinical successes at the primary efficacy assessment 7 days after the end of therapy (assessed as reduced cough, improvement in dyspnoea, reduction in 24-h sputum volume or reduced purulence of sputum). Treatment equivalence was statistically confirmed; treatment difference:--1.0%, 95% CI--6.6% and 4.5%. Before treatment, 128 bacterial strains were isolated from 103 patients (60 ciprofloxacin and 68 co-amoxiclav). The most commonly isolated organism was Haemophilus influenzae (60 isolates), followed by Moraxella catarrhalis (12 isolates), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11 isolates) and Staphylococcus aureus (10 isolates). At day 14, 40 of 46 ciprofloxacin-treated patients (87.0%) and 46 of 55 co-amoxiclav-treated patients (83.6%) who were valid for bacteriological analysis were classified as being bacteriological success (classed as eradication, eradication with colonization or presumed eradication; treatment difference: 3.3%, 95% CI--8.3% and 14.9%). The adverse event profile was comparable between treatment groups. Most adverse events considered possibly or probably related to study drug were related to the gastrointestinal system and were of mild or moderate severity: nausea (13% ciprofloxacin, 10.6% co-amoxiclav), flatulence (10.3% ciprofloxacin, 3.9% co-amoxiclav), abdominal pain (7.6% ciprofloxacin, 7.3% co-amoxiclav) and diarrhoea (4.3% ciprofloxacin, 6.7% co-amoxiclav). We concluded that a 7-day course of ciprofloxacin suspension is equivalent to a 7-day course of co-amoxiclav tablets in terms of clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of AECB. Thus, ciprofloxacin suspension may offer a suitable alternative treatment for AECB patients who have difficulty in swallowing, or who prefer liquid medications to tablets.     

Antibiotic therapy for exacerbation

Bacterial infections are involved in approximately 50% of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Pneumococci, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis are the main pathogens. Studies using quantitative cultures and molecular typing suggest a causal relationship between bacterial infection and exacerbation. Furthermore, an association between infection and bronchial inflammation has been demonstrated. In contrast to steroid therapy and non-invasive ventilation, the benefits of antibiotic treatment are not well established. Current guidelines recommend antimicrobial therapy for AECB in type I exacerbations, for patients needing ventilatory support and for patients with cardiac comorbidity. Bacterial eradication is able to prolong the infection free interval.     

Once-Daily Azithromycin for 3 Days Compared with Clarithromycin for 10 Days for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Bronchitis

Study objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin 500mg once daily for 3 days with those of oral clarithromycin 500mg twice daily for 10 days.

Design

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study.

Setting

Seventy-six study centers in eight countries (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, India, South Africa, and USA).

Patients

Three hundred and twenty-two adult outpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) as documented by increased cough or sputum production, worsening dyspnea, and purulent sputum production.

Interventions

Randomization 1: 1 to azithromycin 500mg once daily for 3 days or clarithromycin 500mg twice daily for 10 days.

Results

The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at day 21–24, or test of cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis (n = 318 patients). The TOC clinical cure rates in the MITT population were equivalent in the two treatment groups at 85% with azithromycin and 82% with clarithromycin (95% CI–5.9%, 12.0%). Clinical success rates on day 10–12 were also equivalent at 93% with azithromycin and 94% with clarithromycin (95% CI–7.9%, 4.4%). Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen were equivalent for the two treatment groups for Haemophilus influenzae (azithromycin, 85.7%; clarithromycin, 87.5%), Moraxella catarrhalis (91.7% and 80.0%, respectively) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (90.6% and 77.8%, respectively). Bacteriologic success rates were also equivalent between the azithromycin and clarithromycin treatment groups at TOC for S. pneumoniae (90.6% and 85.2%, respectively), H. influenzae (71.4% and 81.3%, respectively) and M. catarrhalis (100% and 86.7%, respectively). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups (20.9% and 26.8%, respectively), with the most common being abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.1%, respectively), diarrhea (4.4% and 5.5%, respectively), and nausea (4.4% and 3.7%, respectively).

Conclusions

Three-day treatment with azithromycin 500mg once daily is equivalent to a 10-day treatment with clarithromycin 500mg twice daily in adult patients with AECB.

     

Antibiotikatherapie bei Exazerbation

Bacterial infections are involved in approximately 50% of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Pneumococci, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis are the main pathogens. Studies using quantitative cultures and molecular typing suggest a causal relationship between bacterial infection and exacerbation. Furthermore, an association between infection and bronchial inflammation has been demonstrated. In contrast to steroid therapy and non-invasive ventilation, the benefits of antibiotic treatment are not well established. Current guidelines recommend antimicrobial therapy for AECB in type I exacerbations, for patients needing ventilatory support and for patients with cardiac comorbidity. Bacterial eradication is able to prolong the infection free interval.     

Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of tigecycline monotherapy, a first-in-class, expanded broad spectrum glycylcycline, with the combination of vancomycin and aztreonam (V + A) in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). METHODS: A phase 3, double-blind study conducted in 8 countries enrolled adults with cSSSI who required intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for > or =5 days. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tigecycline or V + A for up to 14 days. Primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic efficacy and in vitro susceptibility to tigecycline of bacteria that cause cSSSI. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory analyses, and adverse event reporting. RESULTS: A total of 596 patients were screened for enrollment, 573 were analyzed for safety, 537 were included in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) population, 397 were clinically evaluable (CE), and 228 were microbiologically evaluable (ME). At test-of-cure, cure rates were similar between tigecycline and V + A groups in the CE population (82.9% versus 82.3%, respectively) and in the c-mITT population (75.5% versus 76.9%, respectively). Microbiologic eradication rates (subject level) at test-of-cure in the ME population were also similar between tigecycline and V + A. Frequency of adverse events was similar between groups, although patients receiving tigecycline had higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and anorexia, while increased ALT/SGPT, pruritis, and rash occurred significantly more often in V + A-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the efficacy of tigecycline monotherapy for the treatment of patients with cSSSI is statistically noninferior to the combination of V + A.     

Epidemiology of chronic bronchitis and acute infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECBs) are one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States, resulting in significant cost to the health care system. Epidemiological information on chronic bronchitis is abundant and has been collected in most industrialized countries. The epidemiology of AECB, however, is less forthcoming. The causes of AECB are multifactorial and include environmental pollutants, allergic responses, and viral and bacterial infections. The role of bacterial infection in AECB is controversial but is believed to account for half of AECB. Because the medical and economic implications of treatment failure in these patients are substantial, an aggressive approach to stratify and treat these patients is necessary. Epidemiological data on chronic bronchitis and acute infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis will allow us to more precisely define the role of bacterial infection in AECB, and this information may help guide antimicrobial therapy.     

Airway inflammation and etiology of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The etiologic role of bacterial pathogens isolated from sputum culture in 40 to 50% of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) is controversial. If bacterial pathogens cause these AECB, they should be associated with greater neutrophilic airway inflammation than pathogen-negative exacerbations. DESIGN: This hypothesis was tested by comparing levels of interleukin (IL)-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and neutrophil elastase (NE) in 81 sputum samples obtained from 45 patients with AECB. Four groups were compared. In the first three groups, nontypable Haemophilus influenzae (n = 20), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (n = 27), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 14) were isolated as sole pathogens, respectively. In the fourth group, only normal flora was isolated (n = 20). Paired samples, obtained from individual patients at different times, that differed in their culture results were also compared. SETTING: An outpatient research clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: These patients were participating in a prospective, longitudinal study of the dynamics of bacterial infection in chronic bronchitis, for which they were seen in the study clinic on a monthly basis as well as when they were experiencing symptoms suggestive of AECB. INTERVENTIONS: None. Measurements and results: H influenzae exacerbations were associated with significantly higher sputum IL-8, TNF-alpha, and NE. M catarrhalis exacerbations demonstrated significantly higher sputum TNF-alpha and NE when compared to pathogen-negative exacerbations. H parainfluenzae-associated exacerbations had an inflammatory profile similar to pathogen-negative exacerbations. Sputum elastase level distinguished bacterial from nonbacterial AECB and correlated with clinical severity of the AECB. CONCLUSIONS: Increased airway inflammation associated with isolation of H influenzae and M catarrhalis supports an etiologic role of these pathogens in AECB.     

Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for relevant studies. Two reviewers extracted data and reviewed the quality of the studies independently. The primary outcome was clinical success at early follow-up. Study-level data were pooled using a random-effects model when I² was >50% or a fixed-effects model when I² was <50%.

Results

Eleven randomized controlled studies were considered. There was no difference between moxifloxacin and comparator agents with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat (ITT) [odds ratio (OR) =1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.42], clinically evaluable (CE) (OR 1.13, 95% CI, 0.93-1.37) patients, or adverse effects in general (OR 1.00, 95% CI, 0.86-1.17). Moxifloxacin was associated with better microbiological success (OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.85).

Conclusions

Moxifloxacin was as clinically equivalent and bacteriologically superior to the antibiotic regimens routinely used in patients with AECB and AECOPD. Moxifloxacin therapy may be a promising and safe alternative to empirical treatment for AECB and AECOPD.KEYWORDS : Moxifloxacin, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), meta-analysis, systematic review