Relapse and mortality following cardioversion of new-onset vs. recurrent atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the elderly.

AIMS: Trials of rate control vs. rhythm control for atrial fibrillation or flutter included few patients with new-onset arrhythmia. Our objective was to assess the relapse rate and the effect of the relapse of new-onset atrial arrhythmias on mortality after direct-current cardioversion (DCCV). METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 351 patients with atrial fibrillation (new onset in 179) and 126 patients with atrial flutter (new onset in 78) was followed-up after DCCV. Cox proportional hazard models were used. Median age was 74.6 years. Mean follow-up for relapse was 7.7 months; for death, 29.4 months. Patients with new-onset atrial flutter [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1] were more likely to maintain sinus rhythm than the patients with recurrent atrial flutter (adjusted HR = 2.5, P < 0.01), new-onset atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR = 2.4, P < 0.01), or recurrent atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR = 2.7, P < 0.01). Patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation were as likely to have relapses as patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation or flutter. Relapse of atrial arrhythmia after DCCV was associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR= 3.1, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: DCCV is more successful in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with new-onset atrial flutter than in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Relapse of atrial arrhythmia after cardioversion is associated with increased mortality.     

Foetal atrial flutter management-the role of electrical cardioversion

We report a successful electrical cardioversion of a foetal atrial flutter (AFL) immediately post delivery. We describe the diagnostic tools, assessment and the management antenatally. Then, we review the literature and discuss the debate about management. We stress the point that if the flutter wave is not progressing, the foetal heart will tolerate till term and we can try electrical cardioversion with confidence after delivery.     

Maintenance of sinus rhythm with metoprolol CR initiated before cardioversion and repeated cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

AIMS: To assess the effect of metoprolol in combination with repeated cardioversion on maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive outpatients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were randomized to treatment with metoprolol CR or placebo in a double-blind fashion. Study treatment was started at least one week before direct current (DC) cardioversion. Patients were followed once a week during the first 6 weeks after cardioversion. In case of relapse during this period, a second cardioversion was performed. Total treatment time was 6 months. A total of 168 patients were randomized to metoprolol (n = 83) or placebo (n = 85). The dose of study treatment at cardioversion was 169 +/- 47 mg in the metoprolol group and 180 +/- 40 mg in the placebo group (P = 0.12). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 46 patients (55%) in the metoprolol group and 34 patients (40%) in the placebo group (P = 0.04) had SR 1 week after cardioversion, and 38 patients (46%) in the metoprolol group compared with 22 patients (26%) in the placebo group had SR after 6 months (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A treatment strategy of metoprolol CR started before cardioversion in combination with prompt second cardioversion in case of early relapse (1-6 weeks) significantly increases the proportion of patients in SR during six months of follow-up.     

Supraventricular ectopy and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion.

AIMS: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is usually preceded by a premature atrial complex (PAC). We hypothesized that patients with a high frequency of atrial ectopic activity after restoration of sinus rhythm following direct current cardioversion would be more likely to experience recurrence of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-four patients with documented persistent AF were studied. A 24 h Holter recording was performed from the day of external direct current cardioversion. Patients were reviewed at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. After 6 months, 59% of patients had experienced a recurrence of AF. Neither the frequency of PACs nor the frequency or duration of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) episodes predicted AF recurrence (P=0.60, 0.30, and 0.42, respectively). There was a trend towards maximum rate of SVT predicting recurrence of AF (P=0.08). CONCLUSION: Frequency of supraventricular ectopy or the number and length of SVT runs in the 24 h after restoration of sinus rhythm are not strong predictors of recurrence of AF after electrical cardioversion. A larger study would be required to detect a small predictive effect.     

Inflammatory markers are not associated with outcomes following elective external cardioversion

BACKGROUND: Electrical cardioversion is a common modality of therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately even if the cardioversion is initially successful many patients revert to atrial fibrillation. It has been proposed that there may be an inflammatory component to this arrhythmia. It is interesting to speculate that this may have a role in determining the outcome following elective cardioversion. METHODS: The study group consisted of 81 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing elective external cardioversion. Blood samples were taken immediately prior to the procedure. Soluble E-Selectin, P-Selectin, intra-cellular adhesion molecule and vascular cell adhesion molecule were assayed using a commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay technique (R&D systems) and high sensitivity C reactive protein was measured by rate nephelometry. Patients were reviewed at 8 weeks and bloods were taken at this time. RESULTS: At baseline patients who had an unsuccessful cardioversion (n=15) were compared to those who had a successful cardioversion (n=66). Thirty-two patients of the 66 initially successful patients reverted to atrial fibrillation during the follow-up period. There was no difference in the levels of baseline serum inflammatory markers measured between those with an unsuccessful cardioversion and those who were successful. When the group who reverted to atrial fibrillation were compared to those who remained in sinus rhythm again there was no difference in the levels of serum markers measured at baseline. CONCLUSION: There was no association between maintenance of sinus rhythm following cardioversion and serum inflammatory markers.     

Remote ischemic preconditioning in a setting of electrical cardioversion of early onset persistent atrial fibrillation (RIP CAF trial): Rationale and study design

BackgroundThe beneficial effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) on electrophysiological parameters resulting in lower inducibility and sustainability of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with paroxysmal AF has been recently demonstrated in a randomized trial. However, the potential clinical impact of RIP on persistent AF (CAF) has not been investigated. Therefore, we designed a randomized trial set in a setting of electrical cardioversion (CV) of early onset CAF.AimThe aim of the study is to answer the following questions: I) Does RIP have impact on rate of spontaneous conversion into sinus rhythm (SR) within 24 h after first RIP intervention? II) Does RIP have the potential to improve the acute outcome of CV following a standardized protocol?MethodsThe presented study is a two-armed randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multi-center trial in a cohort of 588 patients with early onset CAF referred for electrical CV. The patients will undergo 3 sessions (immediately after randomization, the following morning, and directly before scheduled CV 24 h after randomization) of either RIP intervention or a sham procedure. The primary outcome of the study, i.e. documentation of SR 24 h after randomization as well secondary outcome i.e. stable SR first CV without usage of anti-arrhythmic drugs will be documented by 12-lead surface electrocardiography.ConclusionPreviously observed positive effect of RIP on atrial electrophysiology might be also implemented in a clinical setting of CV and therefore simplified and improve patient treatment.     

Flecainide versus ibutilide for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of recent onset.

AIMS: This study compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous flecainide and ibutilide for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective, randomised trial, including 207 patients with AF of recent onset (< or = 48 h). Flecainide was given over 20 min at a dose of 2 mg/kg body weight (maximum 200 mg), ibutilide was infused at a dose of 1 mg (or 0.01 mg/kg if less than 60 kg) over 10 min, followed by a 10 min observation period and an identical second dose if AF did not convert to sinus rhythm (SR). Treatment was considered successful if SR occurred within 90 min of starting medication. The conversion rates were 56.4% in patients given flecainide and 50.0% in patients given ibutilide (P=0.34). Multivariate analysis revealed that a lower age for women independently increased the probability of conversion. None of the other variables, including left atrial size, left ventricular systolic function, presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, plasma levels of potassium or magnesium at baseline, or concomitant use of digoxin, beta-blocker, diltiazem or verapamil were predictors of conversion. The frequency of adverse events was comparable in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the cardioversion efficacy or in the risk of adverse events between flecainide and ibutilide in patients with AF of recent onset. In patients without contraindications to both medications, the physician's choice has to be governed by other factors.     

Atrial stunning as predictor of early relapse into atrial fibrillation after cardioversion

Although the high rate of success after cardioversion, less than 50% of patients maintain sinus rhythm for the first year. In view for the high percentage of relapse into atrial fibrillation, it is interesting to analyze the relationship between atrial stunning after cardioversion and relapse into atrial fibrillation. Thus, we evaluated 101 patients with atrial fibrillation and successful cardioversion. Atrial mechanical function was assessed by measures of transmitral peak A wave velocity, determined before and weekly after cardioversion during 1 month. Fifty-five percent of patient relapse into atrial fibrillation during follow-up. No significant differences were found in clinical and echocardiographic variables between the group with and without relapse. However, the group of patients who relapsed into atrial fibrillation showed a lower peak A wave velocity immediately after cardioversion than patients who maintain in sinus rhythm at month (0.44 ± 0.27 vs. 0.60 ± 0.38 m/s p < 0.01). Impaired atrial function improves during the first 14 days after cardioversion.     

Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of novel low-tilt biphasic waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator. METHODS AND RESULTS: The investigation was performed in three phases in an animal model of AF: a feasibility and efficacy study (in 10 adult Large White Landrace swine), comparison with low-tilt monophasic and standard capacitor-based waveforms, and an assessment of sequential shocks delivered over several pathways (in 15 adult Suffolk sheep). Defibrillation electrodes were positioned transvenously under fluoroscopic control in the high lateral right atrium and distal coronary sinus. When multiple defibrillation pathways were tested, a third electrode was also attached to the lower interatrial septum. The electrodes were then connected to a radiofrequency (RF)-powered defibrillator or a standard defibrillator. After confirmation of successful induction of sustained AF, defibrillation was attempted. Percentage success was calculated from the effects of all shocks delivered to all the animals within each set of experiments. Of the low-tilt (RF) biphasic waveforms delivered during internal atrial cardioversion, 100% success was achieved with a 6/6 ms 100/-50 V waveform (1.45+/-0.01 J). This waveform was similar in efficacy to low-tilt (RF) monophasic waveforms (88 vs. 92% success, 1.58+/-0.01 vs. 2.67+/-0.03 J; P=NS; delivered energy 41% lower) and superior to equivalent voltage standard monophasic (50% success, 0.67+/-0.00 J; P<0.001) and biphasic waveforms (72% success, 0.69+/-0.00 J; P=0.03). Sequential shocks delivered over dual pathways did not improve the efficacy of low-tilt biphasic waveforms. CONCLUSION: A low-tilt biphasic waveform from a RF-powered defibrillator (6/6 ms 100/-50 V) is more efficacious than standard monophasic or biphasic waveforms (equivalent voltage) and is similar in efficacy to low-tilt monophasic waveforms.     

心房颤动及复律药物的研究新进展

心房颤动（atrial fibrillation,AF）是一种心房快速紊乱的心律失常,是一种以心房不协调活动而导致心房机械功能恶化为特征的室上性心律失常,也是目前临床上最常见及危害最严重的心律失常之一,可引起血流动力学发生改变和脑栓塞等严重并发症,因此,房颤已成为心律失常领域的研究热点.世界范围内有3％～5％的人群发生房颤。普通人群发病率为0．7％～1．0％,65岁以上人群发病率约5％,80岁以上老年人发病率高达8％～9％。     

依布利特与普罗帕酮转复心房颤动的临床研究

目的　研究和比较新型Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物依布利特与普罗帕酮转复心房颤动 (房颤 )的有效性及安全性。方法　采用随机、单盲对照研究。共入选房颤持续 1 5h~89d的患者 69例,其中男性 28例,女性 41例,随机进入依布利特组(n=34)、普罗帕酮组(n=35)。前者于 10min内静脉注射依布利特 1mg,后者于 10min内静脉注射普罗帕酮 70mg,如给药结束 10min后仍未转复为窦性心律,各组重复前述治疗 1次。观察开始给药后 1 5h内房颤的转复率及 4h内的不良反应。结果　(1)依布利特转复房颤的成功率明显高于普罗帕酮(70 .59% vs42 .86%,P<0. 05); (2)房颤的转复率与房颤的持续时间有关,持续时间低于 24h的房颤转复率 ( 71 05%, 27 /38 )明显高于持续时间超过 24h者(38 71%, 12 /31,P<0. 01),其中依布利特对持续 24h之内的房颤转复率高达 83 .33% (15 /18); (3)房颤的转复率与左心房直径呈负相关,左心房直径 <4 0cm患者的转复率 ( 75 68%, 28 /37 )明显高于左心房直径≥4 0cm患者的转复率(34. 38%, 11 /32,P<0 01); (4)依布利特最严重的不良反应为非持续性单形室性心动过速,发生率为 8 .82% (3 /34);普罗帕酮最严重的不良反应为低血压 (2. 86%, 1 /35)及长间歇(RR间期>2 .0s, 11 .43%, 4 /35)。结论　依布利特是一种快速转复     

Factors related to the early and late success of direct current cardioversion of chronic nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: An echocardiographic study

OBJECTIVES:

To assess factors related to the success of restoration and one-year maintenance of sinus rhythm in chronic (more than 48 h) nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS:

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients aged 62±9 years with AF lasting 123±254 days were evaluated clinically with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography before elective direct current cardioversion. Heart chamber dimensions and left ventricular ejection fraction were measured. The presence of left atrial thrombi and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast as well as flow velocities in the left atrial appendage were assessed. The first cardioversion was followed by standardized two-step antiarrhythmic treatment including a second cardioversion, if necessary. Twenty patients (13%) spontaneously reverted to sinus rhythm (S) during anticoagulation preceding cardioversion, 81 (54%) were successfully cardioverted (Y), and in 49 (33%) cardioversion failed initially (N). No differences were noted between the two latter groups. However, S patients had smaller left atria measured in the short and long axes (42±4 mm, P=0.05, and 53±7 mm, P=0.005, respectively) than both the Y (45±4 and 61±8 mm) and the N patients (46±4 and 61±8 mm). One-year follow-up was obtained in 95 patients: 64 (67%) were in sinus rhythm while 31 (33%) had AF. Again, no initial differences predicting the maintenance of sinus rhythm were found.

CONCLUSIONS:

Spontaneous reversion of AF seems more likely with smaller left atria. Echocardiography, including trans-esophageal echocardiography, is unlikely to identify patients in whom attempts to restore and maintain sinus rhythm will fail or succeed.     

Atrial premature complexes and heart rate have prognostic significance in 1-month atrial fibrillation recurrence after electrical cardioversion.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of simple 24-h Holter (24H) data after electrical cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. METHODS: We prospectively studied 47 consecutive patients subjected to CV, who successfully converted to sinus rhythm. All underwent echocardiography and 24H after CV. AF recurrence was studied at 14 days and 1 month by second 24H or by interim report of AF. RESULTS: About 53.2% remained in sinus rhythm (group I) and the rest recurred to AF (group II). Group I had fewer atrial premature complexes per hour (APC/h) (P = 0.002) and lower maximum (max HR), average, and minimum heart rates compared with group II (all Ps < 0.05). The optimal value of APC/h and max HR with best sensitivity and specificity was 32 APC/h and 90 bpm, respectively. These findings were the predictors of AF recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.5 with 95% CI = 1.7-11.7 and HR = 4.3 with 95% CI = 1.7-10.9, respectively]. Patients with the combination of both predictors had greater HR of AF recurrence compared with those with < 32 APC/h and max HR < 90 bpm (HR = 8.8 with 95% CI = 2.5-31.4). CONCLUSION: Patients with frequent APC/h and high max HR are at high risk for 1-month AF recurrence after electrical CV.     

Contemporary real life cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Results from the multinational RHYTHM-AF study

Aims

Electrical and pharmacological cardioversion (ECV, PCV) are important treatment options for symptomatic patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation (AF). RHYTHM-AF is an international registry of present-day cardioversion providing information that is not currently available on country differences and acute and long-term arrhythmia outcomes of ECV and PCV.

Methods and results

3940 patients were enrolled, of whom 75% underwent CV. All patients were followed for 2 months. There were large variations concerning mode of CV used, ECV being heterogeneous. A choice of PCV drug depended on the clinical patient profile. Sinus rhythm was restored in 89.7% of patients by ECV and in 69.1% after PCV. Among patients not undergoing CV during admission, 34% spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm within 24 h. ECV was most successful in patients pretreated with antiarrhythmic drugs (mostly amiodarone). PCV was enhanced by class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs; conversion rate on amiodarone was similar to that seen with rate control drugs. Female patients and those with paroxysmal and first detected AF as well as those without previous ECV responded well to PCV. The median duration of hospital stay was 16.2 and 24.0 h for ECV and PCV patients, respectively. There were very few CV-related complications regardless of mode of CV. Chronic maintenance of sinus rhythm was enhanced in patients on chronic antiarrhythmic drugs, beta-blockers or inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system.

Conclusions

Mode of CV varied significantly, but both PCV and ECV were safe and effective. Class Ic drugs were most effective conversion drugs, but amiodarone is used most frequently despite providing merely rate control rather than shorten time to conversion.     

Clinical practicality and predictive value of transoesophageal echocardiography in early cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE)-guided cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in daily clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transthoracic echocardiography and TOE were performed in 346 consecutive patients with AF lasting longer than 48 h or of unknown duration. If no intracavitary thrombus was found, CV was performed within 24 h of the TOE examination. Anticoagulation with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin was always started before CV. Warfarin was continued for at least 1 month after CV. The predictive value of several echocardiographic parameters including peak left atrial appendage emptying velocity (PLAAEV), left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, and spontaneous echo contrast for the initial and long-term success of CV were evaluated. Transoesophageal echocardiography revealed no thrombus or other contraindications to CV in 274/346 (79%) patients. Early CV restored normal sinus rhythm or pacemaker rhythm in 90% (246/274) of the patients. One patient (0.3%) had a stroke within 30 days after CV. Peak left atrial appendage emptying velocity was significantly lower in patients with contraindications to early CV (P<0.001). However, neither PLAAEV nor any other echocardiographic parameter predicted the initial success of CV and the maintenance of sinus rhythm during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Early TOE-guided CV with short-term anticoagulation is a safe and clinically effective alternative in treatment of AF lasting longer than 48 h or of unknown duration. The initial and long-term success of CV cannot be reliably predicted by echocardiographic parameters.     

A review of factors associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm after elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart‐rhythm disorder, affecting about 1.5% to 2% of the population with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity due to stroke, thromboembolism, and heart failure. If the conversion back to sinus rhythm does not happen spontaneously, pharmacological or electrical cardioversion (ECV) is the next available treatment options for some patients. However, the long‐term success following ECV is variable. This review describes the factors that are associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm following ECV and proposes a clinical strategy based on the available evidence.     

The predictive value of C-reactive protein on recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion with or without treatment with atorvastatin

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels prior to cardioversion (CV) predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients randomized to treatment with either atorvastatin or placebo 30 and 180 days after CV.

Methods

This was a prespecified substudy of 128 patients with persistent AF randomized to treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg/day or placebo, initiated 14 days before CV, and continued 30 days after CV. HsCRP levels were measured at randomization, at the time of CV, and 2 days and 30 days after CV.

Results

In univariate analysis of those who were in sinus rhythm 2 h after CV, hsCRP did not significantly (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.25) predict recurrence of AF at 30 days. However, after adjusting for treatment with atorvastatin, hsCRP predicted the recurrence of AF (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.27). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis with gender, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, cholesterol, and treatment with atorvastatin as covariates, the association was still significant (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.29). Six months after CV, hsCRP at randomization predicted recurrence of AF in both univariate analysis (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.60) and in multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06–1.67).

Conclusion

HsCRP was associated with AF recurrence one and six months after successful CV of persistent AF. However, the association at one month was significant only after adjusting for atorvastatin treatment.     

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of pre-treatment and short- or long-term maintenance therapy with amiodarone supporting DC cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The efficacy of cardioversion (DCCV) for restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited by a high relapse rate. Relapse may be reduced by amiodarone but no placebo-controlled trials of efficacy have been performed and the appropriate duration of therapy is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this double-blind study, 161 subjects with persistent AF were randomized to one of three groups-placebo (n=38); amiodarone 400mg BD for 2 weeks prior to DCCV and 200mg daily for 8 weeks followed by placebo for 44 weeks (n=62, short-term amiodarone); amiodarone 400mg BD for 2 weeks then 200mg daily for 52 weeks (n=61, long-term amiodarone). Spontaneous reversion to SR occurred before DCCV in 21% (26/123) patients on amiodarone and none of the 38 patients on placebo (absolute difference 21%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10 to 29%, P=0.002). At 8 weeks following DCCV, 51% (63/123) patients on amiodarone remained in SR compared to 16% (6/38) taking placebo (difference-35% 95% CI: -48 to -18%, P<0.001). At 1 year, 49% (30/61) patients on long-term amiodarone were in SR compared to 33% (21/62) taking short-term amiodarone (difference-15%, 95% CI: -31 to 2%, P=0.085). There was no difference in adverse event rate or quality of life scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone pre-treatment before electrical DCCV for persistent AF allows chemical conversion in one-fifth of patients without altering the efficacy of subsequent DC conversion. Amiodarone is more effective than placebo in the maintenance of SR when continued for 8 weeks following successful DCCV. More patients taking long-term amiodarone remained in SR at 52 weeks, but more had serious adverse effects requiring discontinuation of therapy. Eight weeks of adjuvant therapy with amiodarone following successful DCCV may be the preferred option.     

伊布利特与胺碘酮转复持续性心房颤动的疗效和安全性对比研究

目的 比较伊布利特和胺碘酮转复持续性心房颤动（PAF）的疗效和安全性.方法 2012年3月至2014年5月选取郑州市第十人民医院心内科住院的72例PAF患者,随机分为2组.伊布利特组（33例）采用伊布利特静脉注射转复窦性心律,用量：体质量≥60kg的患者,首次剂量1 mg,体质量＜60kg的患者,首次剂量0.01 mg/kg.胺碘酮组（39例）采用胺碘酮静脉注射转复窦性心律,用量：体质量≥60 kg的患者,首次剂量300 mg,体质量＜60 kg的患者,首次剂量5 mg/kg.比较两组患者用药后30 min内、3h内、12 h内、24h内的转复率,并记录两组患者用药过程中的不良反应.结果 伊布利特组患者用药后30 min内、3h内、12h内、24h内转复率均明显高于胺碘酮组（x2=10.7330,10.6500,8.4538,5.1932,P＜0.01或P＜0.05）;伊布利特组患者的平均转复时间明显短于胺碘酮组（t=7.9009,P＜0.01）;伊布利特QTc平均恢复时间短于胺碘酮（t=15.783,P＜0.01）;两组患者不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义（x2=0.4690,P＞0.05）,但伊布利特组的不良反应持续时间较胺碘酮组更短[（0.38±0.10）h比（16.75±8.39）h,t=11.195,P＜0.01].结论 与胺碘酮相比,伊布利特对持续性房颤的转复率高,转复时间短,不良反应消失快.