Treatment of relapsed carcinoma of the ovary with cisplatin or carboplatin following initial treatment with these compounds

Fifty-four patients with ovarian cancer who achieved a complete or partial remission with cisplatin or carboplatin were rechallenged with the same drug or crossed over to the other platinum compound at relapse. Fifteen of 43 (35%) crossover patients and 1/11 (9%) rechallenged patients responded; the difference was not significant and there was no difference in survival between the two groups. Responders survived significantly longer than nonresponders (P = 0.001) but there was no survival difference between those who responded to a rechallenge and those who responded to crossing over to the other platinum compound. The progression-free interval between the end of initial treatment and relapse was a significant prognostic factor for response to treatment and survival; 17% (6/35) of patients who relapsed before 18 months responded as compared to 53% (10/19) who relapsed after 18 months (P = 0.006) and median survival was 221 and 486 days, respectively, for these two groups (P = 0.026).     

Cisplatin as second-line therapy in ovarian carcinoma treated initially with single-agent paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: The platinum compounds are the most active agents in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma. Phase II trials demonstrated the activity of paclitaxel in patients with disease clinically resistant to platinum-based front-line therapy, and phase III studies confirmed that a combination of paclitaxel plus a platinum was superior to cyclophosphamide plus a platinum. This study evaluated the activity of platinum in patients with bulky advanced disease treated with single-agent paclitaxel as front-line therapy on a Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol. Those patients who had persistent (stable) or progressive disease while receiving paclitaxel, or a recurrence of disease within 6 months of completing six cycles of paclitaxel therapy, received single-agent cisplatin. METHODS: Thirty-nine eligible patients with ovarian carcinoma persistent, progressive, or recurrent after initial treatment with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) over 24 h every 3 weeks received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Among 37 patients evaluable for response, 8 complete (22%) and 13 partial (35%) responses resulted. Twelve (32%) patients exhibited stable disease, while 4 (11%) had increasing disease. Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months. Median survival was 15.0 months. All but two patients were clinically resistant to paclitaxel (progression during or within 6 months after completion of paclitaxel). Grade 2 or worse adverse effects among 39 patients evaluable for toxicity included neutropenia (23), thrombocytopenia (3), anemia (10), nausea and vomiting (23), azotemia (7), neurotoxicity (9), fever (2), and tinnitus (1). CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence that cisplatin is active as second-line therapy in patients clinically resistant to paclitaxel. The overall response rate is high (57%) with excellent progression-free and overall survival in the second-line setting.     

Second-line with paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent disease following first paclitaxel and platinum compounds in ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The combination of paclitaxel and platinum compounds is considered the best first-line regimen for advanced ovarian carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in pretreated patients who recurred within 24 months after a complete clinical response with the same regimen used as first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: 18 patients were included in this study. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion, and carboplatin AUC 6 every 21 days. RESULTS: Among 15 evaluable patients, eight (53%) complete and five (34%) partial responses were observed, while two (13%) patients had stable disease (SD). The response rate was 67% among patients with measurable disease and 52% for evaluable disease. The median progression-free interval after second-line chemotherapy was 8.3 months. The median progression-free interval for patients with measurable disease was 8.6 months and for evaluable disease it was 7.9 months. Seven (46%) of 15 patients have developed recurrence after second-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin with a median time to recurrence of 9.8 months. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 as second-line chemotherapy in this sensitive population is effective in terms of response rate and progression-free interval.     

Experience with single-agent paclitaxel consolidation following primary chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Twelve cycles of single-agent paclitaxel have been demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer whom achieved a clinical complete response to a primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This trial was conducted to compare the toxicity and disease-free interval of 3 cycles vs. 12 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation in patients treated with an intensive three-drug front-line regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, 26 ovarian cancer patients received primary chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, day 1), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2), day 1 day 8), with treatment repeated every 21 days x 6 cycles. The first 13 patients (group A) received three additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days). The second set of 13 patients (group B) also received three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) and then received nine additional cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) consolidation therapy. The change from 3 cycles to 12 cycles of consolidation therapy for group B was made following the published results of GOG 178. RESULTS: In group A, all 13 patients completed three courses of consolidation therapy. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and two patients exhibited both grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 3 patients (23%). In group B, 9 of the 13 patients whom were intended to receive 12 total cycles of paclitaxel consolidation were able to complete the program. There was no grade 3-4 neutropenia or anemia in this population, although 1 patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 7 patients (54%). Although not a randomized experience, median progression-free interval was 76 weeks for group B, and 47 weeks for group A. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel consolidation therapy can be administered for 12 cycles following first-line carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine induction therapy, but there is considerable risk for development of a moderately severe peripheral neuropathy.     

Cisplatinum rechallenge in relapsed ovarian cancer patients with platinum reinduction therapy and carboplatin hypersensitivity

Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported as limiting side effect in patients re-exposed to carboplatin for relapsed gynecologic malignancy. This study analyzed the incidence, clinical features, management, and outcome of carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions. We performed a retrospective study and analyzed medical records of all gynecological cancer patients treated with carboplatin in our institution from 2000 to 2003. No hypersensitivity reactions were observed in 171 patients during the first carboplatin-containing chemotherapy. All six carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 69 patients who were re-exposed to carboplatin (9%). The median number of carboplatin cycles prior to hypersensitivity reaction was nine (range, 8-13). Cisplatin rechallenge was performed in five patients, and no hypersensitivity occurred. An increase in neurotoxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 2) was documented in two patients who had residual neurotoxicity grade 1 due to prior taxane treatment. Cisplatinum rechallenge is a feasible strategy to overcome carboplatin hypersensitivity. However, close monitoring of neurotoxicity is necessary, particularly in patients with residual neurotoxicity due to prior platinum- and taxane-containing chemotherapy.     

Treatment of uterine papillary serous carcinoma with paclitaxel.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and toxicity of monthly treatment with intravenous paclitaxel for women with advanced or recurrent uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). METHODS: Consenting women with histologically confirmed advanced (FIGO stage III or IV) or recurrent UPSC were treated on an Institutional Review Board approved protocol of a 24-h intravenous infusion of 200 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel every 3 weeks. Both measurable and nonmeasurable disease cases were enrolled. Treatment was continued until disease progression, patient intolerance, or (in women with nonmeasurable disease) completion of six courses. RESULTS: Twenty patients received from 1 to 11 cycles of therapy. Two women died of disease after 1 cycle of therapy and were not evaluable for response. Among 13 women with measurable tumor receiving 2 or more cycles of therapy, 4 had a complete clinical response and 6 had a partial response (objective response rate, 77%). The median time to progression was 7.3 months (range, 2-21 months). All 3 remaining patients with measurable disease had stable disease for a median of 6 months. The 5 patients without evaluable disease received 5 to 6 cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel. Three developed recurrence (range, 4-10 months; median, 7.2 months). Neutropenia was the major toxicity. Eleven of the 20 patients required G-CSF support, and 9 were hospitalized for neutropenic fever. One woman had reversible cardiac symptoms, which might have been related to paclitaxel treatment. At the time of analysis (mean follow-up, 23 months; range, 4.3-59.9 months), 13 women had died of disease, 4 were alive with disease, and 2 were disease free. All 3 disease-free patients had been treated for nonmeasurable advanced stage disease. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel appears to have excellent activity in the treatment of advanced or recurrent UPSC, an uncommon but aggressive malignancy. Longer survival appears to be more common among women with small-volume disease.     

Treatment and prevention of female pelvic infection: the quest for single-agent therapy

The advantages of a single-agent regimen for prevention or treatment of female pelvic infections are outlined, and the characteristics of an "ideal" single agent are described. Indications for antimicrobial use in obstetrics and gynecology as well as the pathogens most likely to cause infection are reviewed. Empirical treatment regimens are assessed not only for efficacy but also for safety, simplicity, cost, and potential for inducing bacterial resistance. Piperacillin, as an example of an antimicrobial that may be appropriate for single-agent use in female pelvic infections, is evaluated in depth.     

Salvage radiotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary following chemotherapy

Following single-agent or combination chemotherapy, 9 patients with epithelial carcinoma of the ovary had elective second-look laparotomy. Macroscopic intraperitoneal disease was resected in 4 patients. Therefore, after the laparotomy, all 9 patients had only biopsy-proven, microscopic residual disease, and they received whole abdominopelvic irradiation. Hematological tolerance was satisfactory, with only 2 patients developing asymptomatic thrombocytopenia. Mild gastrointestinal reactions, while frequent during radiotherapy, did not interrupt treatment in any patient. After follow-up from 12 to 34 months (median 16 months) [corrected], 2 patients died of cancer, 2 were alive with cancer, 3 were alive without clinical recurrence, and 2 were alive without biopsy-proven recurrence. Bowel complication occurred in 4 patients: 2 developed intestinal obstruction due to recurrent tumor, 1 developed subacute bowel obstruction which spontaneously resolved, and 1 patient required bowel resection because of a radiation complication. This study indicated that after single- or multiple-drug chemotherapy, most patients could complete the course of whole abdominopelvic irradiation. Gastrointestinal complications could be secondary to radiation damage or to recurrent tumor. While whole abdominopelvic irradiation was not an effective second-line treatment, some long-term survivors could still be expected.     

A new therapeutical approach: topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum

AIM: Topotecan and gemcitabine have demonstrated mono-activity against recurrent ovarian cancer. Both drugs affect DNA replication; in addition, topotecan inhibits DNA repair. Based on the efficacy profiles and different mechanisms of action, a phase-I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (day 1-5) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in combination with gemcitabine (day 1 + 8) every 21 days. METHODS: Three to six patients were treated per dose-level. Patients with ovarian cancer who had failed a platinum and paclitaxel-containing therapy were enrolled. No individual dose escalation or use of cytokines were allowed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. Fifty percent of all patients were pretreated with at least two platinum-containing therapies. Eighty courses were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was reached at a dosage of 0.75 mg/m2 topotecan in combination with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Thrombocytopenia and leucopenia were the major DLTs. The dose for phase-II trials is 0.50 mg/m2 topotecan given with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. In this dose-level only one related non-haematological adverse event > grade 2 was observed (grade 3 mycotic stomatitis) and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred. Responses were observed in six patients and stable disease in four out of 12 assessable patients. Median survival time was 15.3 (95% CI: 13.21-28.64) months. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate feasibility and the tolerability of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Based on these results a phase-II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this new combination.     

A pilot study of three-cycle consolidation chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with clinical complete response after paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three additional cycles of paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with clinical complete response (CR). Patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer stages II-IV with clinical CR after primary surgery and six cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel/platinum entered into the study. Three cycles of paclitaxel/platinum (cisplatin, carboplatin) were administered as a consolidation chemotherapy only in patients who agreed to the informed consent. Patients without further treatment served as controls. A total of 81 patients entered into the study. According to the informed consent, 42 patients were treated by the consolidation chemotherapy, and 39 patients were followed up without further treatment. The median actuarial disease-free survival for the patients with and without consolidation chemotherapy was 25.0 months and 26.0 months, respectively (P= 0.80). The median overall survival is not reached. World Health Organization grade 3-4 toxicities in the consolidation arm were increased but showed no significant differences statistically. Although the sample size is small and not randomized, these results suggest that three cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with paclitaxel/platinum might not provide a favorable outcome in patients with a clinical CR.     

Primary biliary carcinoma with metastasis to the ovary.

The ovary is a relatively frequent site of metastasis from malignant neoplasia arising elsewhere in the body, the majority of these originating from the GI tract. The best known tumor of this type is signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (Krukenberg tumor) of gastric origin. The gall bladder and bile ducts are rare sources of these metastases. Asymptomatic carcinoma of the cystic duct metastasizing to the ovary is extremely rare. We are reporting such a case in which the patient presented with no GI or hepatic symptoms. The cystic duct carcinoma was an incidental finding from routine and careful examination of the abdominal viscera.     

Papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary following prolonged tamoxifen treatment.

We present a patient with breast cancer who developed papillary serous adenocarcinoma of the ovary after 13 years of tamoxifen use. The possible association is explored and the literature is reviewed.     

Gallstone ileus masquerading as recurrent carcinoma of the ovary

A case of gallstone ileus in a patient with carcinoma of the ovary is presented. A 78-year-old female with stage III carcinoma of the ovary underwent optimal debulking surgery followed by six courses of chemotherapy and a microscopically positive second-look laparotomy. She was treated by whole-abdomen pelvic radiation. She then developed progressive nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and eventually complete small bowel obstruction. The diagnosis of gallstone ileus was made preoperatively based on the radiological findings. The pathophysiology of gallstone ileus is discussed in the differential diagnosis of patients treated for carcinoma of the ovary.     

Activity of weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced endometrial cancer previously treated with both a platinum agent and paclitaxel

PURPOSE: The aim of this report is to describe the potential clinical utility of the weekly administration of paclitaxel in patients with endometrial cancer previously treated with a platinum agent and paclitaxel (delivered on an every 3-week schedule). METHODS: We briefly describe the clinical courses of three women with recurrent endometrial cancer who had prior exposure to platinum and paclitaxel, and who were subsequently treated with weekly paclitaxel in an effort to relieve significant cancer-related symptoms. RESULTS: In these individuals, the weekly administration of paclitaxel was reasonably well tolerated. There was evidence of both objective and subjective improvement in the status of the malignant process. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of paclitaxel is a rational management approach in women with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer who have previously received treatment with both a platinum agent and paclitaxel. This delivery strategy should be further explored through the conduct of well-designed clinical trials, both in the primary and secondary chemotherapeutic management of this malignancy.