Evaluation of four methods for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies to dengue virus.

Dengue has become hyperendemic in many islands of the Caribbean region. The performance in a diagnostic laboratory of four commercial assays for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was evaluated. Sera from 62 patients with dengue virus infection were studied. These included 18 patients from whom dengue virus type 2 was isolated in a 1997 outbreak (specimens collected a mean of 14 days after onset of symptoms), 8 patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever (mean time after onset, 11 days), and 36 patients in whom dengue was previously confirmed by serology (mean time after onset, 10 days). Thirty serum specimens from blood donors in a country where dengue is not endemic were used as negative controls. The methods evaluated were two IgM-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (MRL Diagnostics, Cypress, Calif., and PanBio, Queensland, Australia), a dot ELISA dipstick assay (Integrated Diagnostics, Baltimore, Md.), and a rapid immunochromatographic assay for dengue IgG and IgM (PanBio IC). IgG antibodies were also detected by an ELISA method (MRL Diagnostics). The sensitivities of the four assays were as follows: MRL Diagnostics IgM ELISA, 98.4%; PanBio IgM ELISA, 85.5%; Integrated Diagnostics IgM dot ELISA, 96. 8%; and PanBio IC, 83.9%. The specificities of all tests were 100%. Evidence of secondary dengue was found in all patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever and in 83% of the remaining patients. The MRL Diagnostics IgM ELISA appears to be more sensitive than the PanBio IgM ELISA, and this may be significant when IgM titers are low, particularly in patients with secondary dengue infections. The dot ELISA dipstick assay is equally sensitive and may be more appropriate for use in laboratories with lower workloads.     

Evaluation of Four Methods for Detection of Immunoglobulin M Antibodies to Dengue Virus

Dengue has become hyperendemic in many islands of the Caribbean region. The performance in a diagnostic laboratory of four commercial assays for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was evaluated. Sera from 62 patients with dengue virus infection were studied. These included 18 patients from whom dengue virus type 2 was isolated in a 1997 outbreak (specimens collected a mean of 14 days after onset of symptoms), 8 patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever (mean time after onset, 11 days), and 36 patients in whom dengue was previously confirmed by serology (mean time after onset, 10 days). Thirty serum specimens from blood donors in a country where dengue is not endemic were used as negative controls. The methods evaluated were two IgM-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (MRL Diagnostics, Cypress, Calif., and PanBio, Queensland, Australia), a dot ELISA dipstick assay (Integrated Diagnostics, Baltimore, Md.), and a rapid immunochromatographic assay for dengue IgG and IgM (PanBio IC). IgG antibodies were also detected by an ELISA method (MRL Diagnostics). The sensitivities of the four assays were as follows: MRL Diagnostics IgM ELISA, 98.4%; PanBio IgM ELISA, 85.5%; Integrated Diagnostics IgM dot ELISA, 96.8%; and PanBio IC, 83.9%. The specificities of all tests were 100%. Evidence of secondary dengue was found in all patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever and in 83% of the remaining patients. The MRL Diagnostics IgM ELISA appears to be more sensitive than the PanBio IgM ELISA, and this may be significant when IgM titers are low, particularly in patients with secondary dengue infections. The dot ELISA dipstick assay is equally sensitive and may be more appropriate for use in laboratories with lower workloads.     

Comparison of Seven Commercial Antigen and Antibody Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Detection of Acute Dengue Infection

Seven commercial assays were evaluated to determine their suitability for the diagnosis of acute dengue infection: (i) the Panbio dengue virus Pan-E NS1 early enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), second generation (Alere, Australia); (ii) the Panbio dengue virus IgM capture ELISA (Alere, Australia); (iii) the Panbio dengue virus IgG capture ELISA (Alere, Australia); (iv) the Standard Diagnostics dengue virus NS1 antigen ELISA (Standard Diagnostics, South Korea); (v) the Standard Diagnostics dengue virus IgM ELISA (Standard Diagnostics, South Korea); (vi) the Standard Diagnostics dengue virus IgG ELISA (Standard Diagnostics, South Korea); and (vii) the Platelia NS1 antigen ELISA (Bio-Rad, France). Samples from 239 Thai patients confirmed to be dengue virus positive and 98 Sri Lankan patients negative for dengue virus infection were tested. The sensitivities and specificities of the NS1 antigen ELISAs ranged from 45 to 57% and 93 to 100% and those of the IgM antibody ELISAs ranged from 85 to 89% and 88 to 100%, respectively. Combining the NS1 antigen and IgM antibody results from the Standard Diagnostics ELISAs gave the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity (87 and 96%, respectively), as well as providing the best sensitivity for patients presenting at different times after fever onset. The Panbio IgG capture ELISA correctly classified 67% of secondary dengue infection cases. This study provides strong evidence of the value of combining dengue virus antigen- and antibody-based test results in the ELISA format for the diagnosis of acute dengue infection.     

High-level expression of recombinant dengue viral NS-1 protein and its potential use as a diagnostic antigen

The prevalence of NS1 Ab response in patients with dengue viral infection and the potential of using recombinant NS1 protein as a diagnostic antigen for dengue viral infection were investigated. In this study, the full-length and C-terminal half of NS1 proteins (rNS1, rNS1-C) were highly expressed (10-30 mg/l) and further purified and refolded. The good antigenicity of the full-length rNS1 protein was confirmed by interaction with 19 dengue NS1-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in ELISA; however, the antigenicity of rNS1-C was relatively lower. The full-length rNS1 antigen also differentiated reliably between sera from dengue virus-infected patients and sera from normal controls. When rNS1 was used as an antigen to detect human anti-NS1 IgM and IgG Ab, the anti-NS1 Ab response was found in 15 of 17 patients (88%) with primary dengue infection and all 16 patients (100%) with secondary dengue infection. These results indicated that using the full-length rNS1 whose antigenicity is restored as ELISA antigen, a high anti-NS1 antibody prevalence could be detected in patients with either primary or secondary dengue infection. This finding suggested that the anti-NS1 antibody appeared not only in secondary and severe dengue virus infection and might not correlate the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. The study also verified that our purified rNS1 protein showed similar immunological properties as native dengue viral proteins. Genetic engineering production of recombinant NS1 antigen could provide a safe and valuable resource for dengue virus serodiagnosis.     

Dengue NS1-specific antibody responses: isotype distribution and serotyping in patients with Dengue fever and Dengue hemorrhagic fever

To understand the antibody responses to dengue (DEN) nonstructural 1 (NS1) glycoprotein and their roles in protective immunity or pathogenesis of dengue fever (DF) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), we have analyzed the NS1-speccific IgM, IgA and IgG antibodies from patients with DF and DHF. An isotype-specific, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established by coating a NS1-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb), D2/8-1, to capture soluble NS1 antigens secreted in the culture supernatants of Vero cells infected with DEN virus. We observed strong anti-NS1 antibody responses in all of the convalescent sera of patients with DF and DHF. Similar NS1-specific isotypic and serotypic antibody responses were found in the sera from DF and DHF patients. The results showed that all DEN infections induced significant NS1-specific IgG, whereas 75% and 60% of primary DF patients vs. 40% and 90% of secondary DF patients produced IgM and IgA antibodies, respectively. Specificity analysis showed that DEN NS1-specific IgG and IgA antibodies cross-react strongly to Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus NS1 glycoprotein, whereas DEN NS1-specific IgM antibodies do not cross-react to JE virus NS1 glycoprotein at all. The serotype specificity of NS1-specific IgM, IgA and IgG were found to be 80%, 67% and 75% for primary infections, and 50%, 22% and 30% for secondary infections in positive samples of DF patients. Similar pattern was found in DHF patients. The results showed that all of the DF and DHF patients produced significant NS1-specific antibodies. We did not observe direct correlation between the anti-NS1 antibody responses and DHF because sera from patients with DF and DHF showed similar anti-NS1 antibody responses.     

Antibody-capture ELISA for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies in sera from Japanese encephalitis and dengue hemorrhagic fever patients

Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody titers in paired sera from 19 encephalitis and 44 dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) patients in Thailand and 42 Japanese encephalitis (JE) patients in Japan were measured by the antibody capture ELISA and applied to distinguish JE virus infection from dengue virus infection. Titer distribution and the ratio of the titers against JE and dengue antigens led to the following diagnostic criteria. The specimens can be considered as positive with JE when IgM-ELISA titer showed over 200 against JE and 4-fold or more higher than titers against any types of dengue antigens. The specimens can be considered as positive with dengue infection when IgM ELISA titer showed over 200 against one of the 4 types of dengue antigens and 4-fold or more higher than against JE antigen. Based on these criteria, 41 of 42 patients in Japan and 11 of 19 encephalitis patients in Thailand could be diagnosed as having JE virus infection while 2 of 19 encephalitis patients in Thailand and 26 of 44 DHF patients in Thailand could be diagnosed as having dengue virus infections.     

Evaluation of an IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for dengue diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test has been one of the standards, with the IgM antibody capture ELISA (MAC-ELISA), for the diagnosis of dengue virus infections. The spread of dengue throughout the world and the increasing number of cases to be tested makes an ELISA-format test for IgG antibodies to replace the HI test highly desirable. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the use of the IgG-ELISA as a substitute for the HI test in dengue diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN: Paired serum samples defined as being from primary or secondary dengue virus infections by HI, were tested by an ELISA that detects IgG antibodies. The correlations of titers and serologic interpretations between these two tests were examined. RESULTS: The IgG-ELISA showed a low correlation with the HI in primary infections, and a higher correlation in secondary infections because of the influence of IgM antibodies in the HI test. Nevertheless, IgG ELISA titers could be reliably associated with primary or secondary infections when analyzed by days after onset of symptoms, and can be used to characterize the immune response after flavivirus infections. CONCLUSION: The combination of the IgM and IgG ELISAs may be used to serologically diagnose dengue virus infections, since the IgG ELISA can substitute for the HI test in characterizing the immune response to dengue virus infections.     

Evaluation of immunoglobulin M and G capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Panbio kits for diagnostic dengue infections.

BACKGROUND: Serological assays are widely used to confirm dengue virus infections and to differentiate between a primary and a secondary infection. OBJECTIVE: Two commercial dengue diagnostic kits, Panbio Dengue IgM Capture and Dengue IgG Capture ELISA (Brisbane, Australia) were evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred and seventy-three serum samples were tested. Panel sera included samples from dengue confirmed cases (representing both primary and secondary infections), from non-dengue infectious diseases, and from healthy individuals. The MAC-ELISA/Dengue IPK was used for the detection of anti-dengue virus IgM antibody in the sera and the ELISA inhibition method (EIM/Dengue IPK) was used to differentiate between primary and secondary infections. Both these reference assays, which were previously developed in the Arbovirus Laboratory at the "Pedro Kouri" Tropical Medicine Institute, were employed as the gold standard. RESULTS: High sensitivity (96.8%) and specificity (99.4%) were found with the commercial diagnostics when compared to the reference methods. Furthermore, high concordance 95.5% in classifying dengue infection types (primary or secondary infections) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The Panbio Dengue IgM and IgG assays offer a good alternative for dengue diagnosis. They are easy to perform and results can be obtained in less than 3h.     

Laboratory diagnosis of primary and secondary dengue infection.

BACKGROUND: Dengue fever is routinely detected in many laboratories using commercial tests for the specific detection of dengue IgM antibodies. OBJECTIVES: We have studied the sensitivity of IgM antibody detection in paired serum samples of 43 patients with either with primary dengue (PD) or secondary dengue (SD). STUDY DESIGN: Two consecutive samples were drawn from 23 Vietnamese and 20 German patients. All patients were selected for a positive PCR and for the fact that consecutive serum samples were available. The diagnosis of PD was based on seroconversion to dengue antigen and in SD on the detection of virus RNA in the presence of anti-dengue IgG antibodies. RESULTS: In samples of patients with PD fever taken during days 1-3 of the disease no IgM antibody could be detected. During days 4-7 and after day 7, IgM antibody was detected in 55% and 94%, respectively. In patients with SD fever, even less positive IgM samples were found in samples taken during days 4-7 (47%) and after day 7 (78%). IgG titers were significantly higher in SD compared to PD patients, although high (>1280) titers were also found in some PD patients. CONCLUSION: In numerous acute dengue fever patients an early diagnosis will be obtained only by combining IgM antibody detection with detection of virus or virus RNA using RT-PCR.     

Immunoglobulin A Antibody Responses in Dengue Patients: a Useful Marker for Serodiagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection

We determined the usefulness of an immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serodiagnosis of dengue virus infections. The results indicate that the presence of IgA and IgM in serum samples assures recent primary dengue virus infection even with a single serum sample.     

Analysis of specific IgM responses in secondary dengue virus infections: levels and positive rates in comparison with primary infections.

BACKGROUND: Dengue viruses are a serious cause of illness in tropical and subtropical areas of the world. Laboratory diagnosis is essential for confirmation of dengue virus infections. Detection of specific IgM by IgM-capture enzymed-linked immunoassay (ELISA) has been widely used as a main serological diagnostic technique. OBJECTIVES: The levels of specific IgM in secondary dengue virus infections were compared with those in primary infections. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1780 samples collected from 924 confirmed dengue cases were tested for anti-dengue IgM by IgM-capture ELISA. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Specific IgM was detected in all the cases with primary dengue virus infection on disease day 9 or later. However, specific IgM cannot be detected in 28% (204/716) of the cases in secondary infections. The average titers of IgM were higher in primary infections than in secondary infections. The results confirmed that IgM detection is a reliable serological diagnostic test in primary dengue virus infections. Although IgM detection is also a useful test, other serological diagnostic tests or tests for dengue virus detection are necessary for confirmation of all the secondary dengue virus infections.     

Immunoglobulin A antibody responses in dengue patients: a useful marker for serodiagnosis of dengue virus infection

We determined the usefulness of an immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serodiagnosis of dengue virus infections. The results indicate that the presence of IgA and IgM in serum samples assures recent primary dengue virus infection even with a single serum sample.     

用重组汉坦病毒NP、GP检测急性期HFRS患者血清中特异性IgG、IgM、IgA抗体

目的 探讨肾综合征出血热(HFRS)患者急性期IgA、IgG、IgM抗体的变化规律。方法 使用套式RT-PCR检测此次病毒感染情况。用杆状病毒表达的汉坦病毒重组核蛋白(rNP)和糖蛋白(rGP)为抗原，使用ELISA方法检测了14例急性期肾综合征出血热患者的6l份系列血清中的IgA、IgG、IgM抗体。结果 14例肾综合征出血热患者中，ll例患者的血清用RT-PCR检出家鼠型汉坦病毒核酸。几乎所有肾综合征出血热患者早期即有IgA、IgM、IgG抗体的迅速升高，抗rNP抗体滴度明显高于rGP。3种抗rNP抗体中早期IgG上升趋势最为显著，IgM与IgA次之，IgM与IgA上升趋势相近，但IgA的滴度明显高于IgM。抗rGP抗体中XgA变化最显著，IgG次之。IgM发病2周内总的变化趋势不明显，但是发病l周内滴度上升趋势明显，而发病第2周内则呈下降趋势。其中l例RT-PCR阳性的患者，早期IgM未测出，IgA的滴度却较高。l例重度患者，抗糖蛋白IgG、IgM和IgA抗体滴度均低于其他患者，且整个急性期一直维持较低水平。结论 肾综合征出血热急性期IgA、IgG、lgM变化具有明显的规律，抗糖蛋白和核蛋白抗体病患规律不同，检测IgM的同时检测IgA，可以提高诊断的准确性。     

MAC-ELISA and ELISA inhibition methods for detection of antibodies after yellow fever vaccination

The IgM antibody capture ELISA (MAC-ELISA) and ELISA inhibition methods for the detection of antibodies against dengue virus were modified to detect antibodies against yellow fever virus. Tests were carried out in 21 persons vaccinated with 17D and compared with the Plaque reduction neutralizing test. Of 17 naive subjects vaccinated, 16 (94%) seroconverted using the MAC-ELISA test and 14 (82%) seroconverted (or ≥fourfold titer increase) in the ELISA inhibition method. Cross-reactivity was evaluated by both tests and resulted in a high specificity to IgM antibodies against yellow fever, when all the samples from vaccinated individuals were negative by MAC-ELISA using dengue antigen. However, 10.7% of the positive dengue sera from the Santiago de Cuba epidemic cross-reacted by MAC-ELISA using yellow fever antigen. ELISA inhibition method showed high cross-reactivity when the 21 sera pairs were worked with yellow fever and dengue antigens. The MAC-ELISA and ELISA inhibition methods have become indispensable tools in our laboratory in order to maintain a surveillance system for dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. They are relatively rapid, simple, and they do not require sophisticated equipment. Both MAC-ELISA and ELISA inhibition methods for yellow fever could be useful for diagnosis, surveillance and yellow fever vaccine evaluation.     

Antibody responses to an immunodominant nonstructural 1 synthetic peptide in patients with dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever

Two flaviviruses, dengue (DEN) virus and Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus, are important because of their global distribution and the frequency of epidemics in tropical and subtropical areas. To study the B-cell epitopes of nonstructural 1 (NS1) glycoprotein and anti-NS1 antibody response in DEN infection, a series of 15-mer synthetic peptides from the predicted B-cell linear epitopes of DEN-2 NS1 protein were prepared. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to analyze antibody responses to these peptides from sera of both DEN and JE patients. One peptide derived from DEN-2 NS1, D2 NS1-P1 (amino acids 1–15), was identified as the immunodominant epitope that reacted with sera from dengue fever (DF) patients but not JE patients. The isotype of D2 NS1-P1-specific antibodies was mainly immunoglobulin M (IgM) in all sera that tested positive. A specificity study demonstrated that sera from all four DEN types reacted with D2 NS1-P1. A dynamics study showed that specific antibodies to this peptide could be detected as early as 2 days after the onset of symptoms. We observed significant anti-D2 NS1-P1 antibody responses in 45% of patients with primary and secondary infections with DF or with dengue hemorrhagic fever. This is the first report demonstrating that significant anti-DEN NS1 antibodies can be induced in the sera of patients with primary DEN infection. J. Med. Virol. 57:1–8, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Antibodies from dengue patient sera cross-react with endothelial cells and induce damage

Dengue virus infection causes a wide range of diseases from the mild febrile illness dengue fever to the life-threatening dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Vascular leakage and hemorrhagic syndrome are the clinical features associated with dengue infection, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, the cross-reactivity of dengue patient sera with endothelial cells was demonstrated. There were higher percentages of endothelial cells reactive with dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome patient sera than those with dengue fever patient sera. The percentages of endothelial cells reactive with patient serum IgM were higher than those with IgG. Further studies showed that the endothelial cell binding activity was inhibited by pretreatment with dengue virus nonstructural protein 1 (NS1). The antibodies against NS1 produced after dengue virus infection may, at least in part, account for the cross-reactivity of patient sera with endothelial cells. Furthermore, dengue patient sera induced endothelial cell apoptosis via a caspase-dependent pathway that was also inhibited by NS1 pretreatment. In addition to apoptosis, patient sera caused cell lysis in the presence of complement, and DHF/DSS patient sera showed higher percentages of cytotoxicity than dengue fever patient sera. Thus, the generation of cross-reactive autoantibodies against endothelial cells would lead to their dysfunction, which may play a role in the pathogenesis of dengue virus infection.     

Kinetics of dengue virus-specific serum immunoglobulin classes and subclasses correlate with clinical outcome of infection.

The kinetics of dengue virus (DEN)-specific serum immunoglobulin classes (immunoglobulin M [IgM] and IgA) and subclasses (IgG1 to IgG4) were studied in patients suffering from dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Serum samples from non-DEN febrile patients were included as controls. IgM, IgG1, and IgG3 serum antibodies were the predominant immunoglobulins throughout the course of illness in all three patient groups. In contrast, IgA antibodies were significantly higher in the acute phase in DSS patients compared to those in DF patients (P < 0.05). The levels of IgG1 differed significantly between patients with DF and those with DHF and DSS (P < 0.05). A significant difference was also found in IgG3 levels between DF patients and DHF patients (P < 0.05) but not between DF patients and DSS patients. Finally, levels of IgG4 antibodies differed significantly between DF patients and DSS patients (P < 0.05). Collectively, these data show that increased levels of DEN-specific IgA, IgG1, and IgG4 serum antibodies are risk markers for the development of DHF and DSS and that their measurement may provide valuable guidance for early therapeutic intervention.     

Immunoglobulin A-Specific Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Diagnosis of Dengue Fever

Dengue fever (DF) is usually diagnosed by testing for dengue virus immunoglobulin M (IgM) by a capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (MAC-ELISA). However, IgM can last for months, and its presence might reflect a previous infection. We have tested the use of anti-dengue virus IgA capture ELISA (AAC-ELISA) for the diagnosis of DF by comparing the results of MAC-ELISAs and AAC-ELISAs for 178 serum samples taken from patients with confirmed cases of DF. IgM appears more rapidly (mean delay of positivity, 3.8 days after the onset of DF) than IgA (4.6 days) but lasts longer; the peak IgA titer is obtained on day 8. The specificity and the positive predictive value of AAC-ELISA are 100%; its sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) are also 100% between days 6 and 25 after the onset of DF, but they decrease drastically when data for tests conducted with specimens from the first days of infection are included, because the IgA titers, like the IgM titers, have not yet risen. AAC-ELISA is a simple method that can be performed together with MAC-ELISA and that can help in interprating DF serology.     

Kinetics of specific IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM antibody responses in rubella

Rubella-specific IgD and IgE antibodies were determined with a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay using enzyme-labeled heavy-chain specific anti-immuno-globulins, and the antibody responses in rubella infection were compared to IgM, IgA, and IgG antibodies. IgD and IgE antibodies increased rapidly after the onset of infection, remained at a high level for at least 2 months, and declined slightly by 6 months. In comparison, the IgM antibodies decreased more rapidly, whereas the IgG antibodies persisted longer at a steady level. By 6 months the mean levels of the different antibodies had declined from their maximal mean levels as follows: IgM, 52%; IgA, 42%; IgE, 35%; IgD, 29%; and IgG, 8%. Thus IgD and IgE antibodies, in spite of their known short half lives, persisted longer than IgM and IgA antibodies, which limits their diagnostic value. The IgA antibody responses were found too variable to substitute for IgM antibody determination in diagnosis of a recent rubella virus infection from a single serum specimen. Comparison of maternal and cord blood sera indicated that, in addition to IgG antibodies, rubella-specific IgD antibodies were found to cross the placenta.     

Hantavirus infection in Iranian patients suspected to viral hemorrhagic fever

Background: Hantaviruses are a group of emerging pathogens causing hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and Hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome in human. This study was conducted to investigate Hantavirus infection among Iranian viral hemorrhagic fever suspected patients. Methods: From April 2014 to June 2016, 113 cases from 25 different provinces of Iran were analyzed for Hantavirus infection by IgM/IgG ELISA and pan-Hantavirus RT-PCR tests. Results: Although, viral genome was detected in none of the subjects, IgM and IgG antibodies were detected in 19 and 4 cases, respectively. Differentiation of the anti-Hantavirus antibodies according to virus species by EUROLINE Anti-Hantavirus Profile Kit revealed three Puumala virus IgM positive, one Hantaan virus IgM positive, one Hantaan virus IgM borderline, and two Puumala virus IgG borderline cases. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the circulation of Hantaviruses in Iran and calls for further investigations of these life-threatening viruses in the country.