Psychiatric emergencies in the elderly population

This article reviews the most common behavioral emergencies in the geriatric population. Psychiatric emergencies are seen frequently by emergency physicians who face the challenge of assessing and managing patients presenting with psychosis, severe depression, agitation, suicidal intent, and substance abuse in the emergency department. The evaluation is frequently complicated by the necessity to investigate numerous domains such as underlying medical conditions, prior psychiatric disorders and substance abuse, as well as psychosocial factors. It is crucial to rule out organic causes for what appears to be psychiatric disease in the elderly. The assessment might be further complicated by the patient's limited ability to recall pertinent aspects of the history due to either cognitive impairment or acute distress. Emergency department personnel might have inadequate expertise in assessing emergencies in elderly persons, further impeding the ability to appropriately manage behavioral complications in geriatric patients. Availability of high-quality emergency care and tight collaboration with primary care providers, psychiatric consultants, and social services is crucial to optimal outcomes from acute psychiatric decompensations in the elderly.     

Psychiatric disorders in geriatric medical/surgical patients. Part II: Review of clinical experience in consultation

Of a consecutive series of 1,000 psychiatric consultation requests, 195 were for patients 60 years of age or older. The most frequent psychiatric diagnoses assigned by the consultant were organic psychiatric and depressive spectrum disorders. This communication reviews frequently encountered syndromes and the other major clinical issues relevant to geriatric psychiatry and provides illustrative cases. The mental status examination is a sensitive diagnostic tool that can improve the clinician's diagnostic skills. We conclude that screening the elderly medically ill patient for these psychiatric disorders will improve patient care and significantly diminish morbidity.     

Alcoholism in elderly persons: a study of the psychiatric and psychosocial features of 216 inpatients

The medical records of 216 elderly persons, admitted to the hospital for treatment of alcoholism, were reviewed. Concern of family and friends was the most common factor motivating patients for admission. Patients with late-onset alcoholism reported an association between a life event and problem drinking more frequently than did the early-onset alcoholics. The most common associated psychiatric disorders were tobacco dependence (67%), organic brain syndrome (25%), atypical or mixed organic brain syndrome (19%), and affective disorder (12%). Fourteen percent of patients also had a drug abuse or dependence problem, all using legally prescribed drugs. Psychiatric diagnoses and results of psychologic testing did not differ between early-onset and late-onset alcoholism groups. In a 60-patient cohort studied for correlation of outcome of treatment for alcoholism with major psychiatric diagnoses, no associations were found.     

Eating disorders in adolescents and young adults

Eating disorders are relatively common and frequently result in medical signs and symptoms. Armed with an appreciation of the protean manifestations of these complex health problems as well as an appreciation of the biopsychosocial approach needed to help the adolescent or young adult woman recover, the primary care physician is in an excellent position to have a therapeutic role in the recovery from these chronic conditions. By recognizing the medical aspects of eating disorders, the oversimplified viewpoint of considering them as purely psychiatric disorders can be avoided. Open and consistent communication with patients, with a focus on health rather than dysfunction and mental illness, facilitates the acceptance of a comprehensive approach in which the internist, dietitian, and mental health provider all have a role.     

Primary care for depression

Depressive patients often visit a primary care physician due to various physical symptoms. Though it is necessary to differentiate organic diseases, it is also important to approach from a viewpoint of psychosocial background and psychiatric disorders. Especially, as mild depression is seen widely in general practice, early diagnosis and early treatment is essential for its good prognosis and medical economics. So, primary care physician is expected to understand its symptomatology and treat depressive patients appropriately. Finally, I want to say that the cooperation between primary physician and psychiatrist is important, because typical bipolar disorders and severe depressive patients should be refer to psychiatry clinic.     

Postpartum disorders in primary care: diagnosis and treatment

Postpartum psychiatric illness consists of a highly prevalent group of disorders, which can result in serious dysfunction and require treatment. Patients are more likely to seek help for these disorders from their primary care physicians rather than mental health professionals. While severe postpartum depression and psychoses are easily recognized, milder or more insidious forms of depressive illness frequently are missed. Heightened sensitivity to and screening for the presence of these prevalent psychiatric disorders facilitates and enhances recognition of postpartum disorders and leads to more expeditious treatment.     

Personality disorders

Personality disorders are gaining a similar level of attention in the primary care literature as afforded to mood, anxiety, and substance abuse disorders. A personality disorder-comorbid with a medical or other psychiatric diagnosis-presents a challenge for primary care physicians because of diagnostic and treatment dilemmas, as well as management of the physician's interpersonal reaction to the patient. This article reviews research on prevalence, clinical presentation and assessment, and treatment, with specific recommendations for primary care physicians. Strategies to enhance the physician-patient relationship, including the use of empathic skills and the facilitation of physician well-being, are presented. Integrating these tools into routine practice can lead to more satisfying treatment relationships between primary care physicians and patients who have personality disorders.     

A streamlined method for diagnosing common psychiatric disorders in primary care

Primary care practitioners treat the majority of patients with psychiatric disorders, but many patients in general medical practices continue to suffer from undiagnosed mental illnesses. Over the past 10 years, clinical investigators have focused on enhancing the detection of psychiatric disorders in primary care. Several diagnostic tools have been developed for use by clinicians who are not psychiatrists. However, the time constraints of real-world office practice and the often-cumbersome psychiatric nomenclature have limited their use. Recent studies have tested even more streamlined diagnostic methods that require only a few minutes of physician time while correlating strongly with formal psychiatric evaluations. This article consolidates these research findings with practical experience in the rapid detection of 5 psychiatric conditions commonly encountered in primary care: depression, anxiety, stress reactions, substance abuse, and cognitive impairment. An efficient, 2-step method is described that consists of carefully targeted screening questions followed by a confirmatory evaluation. The screening questions and confirmatory examination can be incorporated easily into most primary care practices.     

Home health care's unique role in serving the elderly mentally ill

Psychiatric home health services are a viable option for providing essential treatment to elderly clients having major mental disorders or acute psychiatric problems secondary to a medical illness. This valuable adjunct to in-home treatment can be provided by psychiatric mental health nurse specialists who work collaboratively with other mental health disciplines. If a home health agency does not have a psychiatric treatment component, it can expand its services by hiring a qualified psychiatric nurse and educating its interdisciplinary staff in the appropriate care of mentally ill clients. Referrals can be obtained from facilities for acute psychiatric disorders, psychiatrists, general hospitals, outpatient clinics, and patients themselves or their families. This important service can benefit acutely ill psychiatric patients by enabling them to be discharged from inpatient settings sooner and treated comfortably in the less restrictive environment of their home while receiving appropriate and adequate follow-up and referral. As such, it is cost-efficient to the client and society and represents the community-based care of the future for the mentally ill.     

Alcoholism in elderly persons: medical aspects and prognosis of 216 inpatients

We describe 216 elderly patients (65 years of age or older) who were treated for alcoholism in an inpatient treatment program. Emphasis is placed on the demographics, medical characteristics, results of laboratory tests, outcome of treatment, and various comparisons of early- and late-onset alcoholism. The frequency of serious medical disorders among these patients was higher than would be expected for the overall population of a similar age. Elderly alcoholics have more abnormal results of commonly used laboratory tests than do younger alcoholics. Our data show that the elderly alcoholic can be successfully treated in a medically oriented inpatient treatment program. The concept of less-intensive treatment for the elderly alcoholic is generally not supported. More-intensive treatment may be necessary for some of these patients because of the high frequency of accompanying major medical and psychiatric problems. Early-onset alcoholism predominated, but we found no major differences between the two groups.     

A review of screening tools for psychiatric comorbidity in headache patients

Psychiatric comorbidity, especially depression and anxiety, has been well documented in patients with primary headache disorders. The presence of psychiatric comorbidity in headache patients is associated with decreased quality-of-life, poorer prognosis, chronification of disease, poorer response to treatment, and increased medical costs. Despite the prevalence and impact, screening for psychiatric disorders in headache patients is not systematically performed, either clinically or in research studies, and there are no guidelines to suggest which patients should be screened or in what manner. We review a variety of screening methods and instruments, focusing primarily on self-report measures and those available in the public domain. Informal verbal screening may be sufficient in a primary care setting, but should include screening for both anxiety and depression. Explicit screening for anxiety is important, as anxiety may have a more significant impact on headache than does depression and may occur in the absence of clinical depression. Formal screening with instruments that can identify a variety of psychiatric disorders is appropriate for patients with daily headache syndromes, patients who are refractory to usual care, and patients referred for specialty evaluation. Limitations of screening instruments include the influence of transdiagnostic symptoms and the need for confirmatory diagnostic interview. The following instruments appear most suitable for use in headache patients: for depression, the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Module, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, or the Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care; for anxiety, the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale; and for multidimensional psychiatric screening, the Patient Health Questionnaire or Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders.     

A Review of Screening Tools for Psychiatric Comorbidity in Headache Patients

Psychiatric comorbidity, especially depression and anxiety, has been well documented in patients with primary headache disorders. The presence of psychiatric comorbidity in headache patients is associated with decreased quality-of-life, poorer prognosis, chronification of disease, poorer response to treatment, and increased medical costs. Despite the prevalence and impact, screening for psychiatric disorders in headache patients is not systematically performed, either clinically or in research studies, and there are no guidelines to suggest which patients should be screened or in what manner. We review a variety of screening methods and instruments, focusing primarily on self-report measures and those available in the public domain. Informal verbal screening may be sufficient in a primary care setting, but should include screening for both anxiety and depression. Explicit screening for anxiety is important, as anxiety may have a more significant impact on headache than does depression and may occur in the absence of clinical depression. Formal screening with instruments that can identify a variety of psychiatric disorders is appropriate for patients with daily headache syndromes, patients who are refractory to usual care, and patients referred for specialty evaluation. Limitations of screening instruments include the influence of transdiagnostic symptoms and the need for confirmatory diagnostic interview. The following instruments appear most suitable for use in headache patients: for depression, the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Module, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, or the Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care; for anxiety, the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale; and for multidimensional psychiatric screening, the Patient Health Questionnaire or Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders.     

Improving recognition of psychiatric disorders in a primary care practice

A high percentage of patients who seek care from primary care physicians have a psychiatric disorder, either as the primary illness or secondary to a medical illness or drug use. Drs Thompson and Petersen discuss a number of approaches that physicians can take to better recognize psychiatric disorders, so that they may treat or consult on the less complicated conditions and refer complex or resistant conditions to a psychiatrist.     

Detection and diagnosis of psychiatric disorders in primary medical care settings

Research efforts accelerated in the 1990s to define the presentation of common psychiatric disorders in primary care settings. Two diagnostic instruments, the DSM-IV-PC and the PRIME-MD, were introduced in 1994, and a self-report form of the PRIME-MD, the PHQ, was published in 1999. These tools have streamlined the larger, often cumbersome psychiatric nomenclature of the DSM-III and DSM-IV and appear to be more useful in general medical settings. It still is not practical to use either instrument in its entirety for all patients in a busy primary care practice. Studies have suggested an efficient and effective, two-step method of screening primary care patients for psychiatric disorders, however. In this approach, a limited number of probing questions extracted from the PRIME-MD or PHQ (or DSM-IV-PC) are posed to patients, either in person or by a written self-report (i.e., a general health update or review of systems). Then a follow-up evaluation is done to confirm or refute positive screening results. Short, simple questionnaires that address specific topics (e.g., CAGE for alcohol screening or the GDS for mood disorders in older adults) complete and complement this approach. This method has the advantage of being easy to incorporate into routine office practice using minimal physician or office staff time, while showing acceptable sensitivity and specificity in studies to date. More research, particularly prospective studies, is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this approach and expand it beyond the few available studies that have focused mostly on depressive disorders.     

The role of psychiatric diagnosis in satisfaction with primary care: data from the department of veterans affairs

BACKGROUND: Although patient satisfaction is widely used as a quality indicator, most such measures do not account for patient subgroups such as those with psychiatric illness. There is also very little data on satisfaction of psychiatric patients with their medical care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the role of psychiatric illness in satisfaction with outpatient primary care services in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). METHOD: Data from the VA Customer Feedback Survey (n = 50,532) were merged with administrative data to determine diagnoses and other characteristics. Satisfaction ratings were compared across psychiatric diagnoses and across various aspects of satisfaction with care. RESULTS: After controlling for patient characteristics (eg, gender, age, disability, acute vs. routine visit) and subjective health, patients with schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder, drug abuse, depression, and other psychiatric disorders reported significantly lower satisfaction with their outpatient primary care. Dissatisfaction was particularly reported for access to care and overall coordination of care. CONCLUSIONS: Despite VA characteristics that might be thought to improve satisfaction (eg, easier access to specialty mental health services as a result of the integrated VA system), patients with psychiatric disorders are significantly less satisfied than patients without such disorders. Possible explanations include both lower technical quality of care and poorer interpersonal communication between providers and patients with mental illness, including the negative effects of stigma. These findings highlight the need for satisfaction ratings to be case-mix-adjusted, including the incorporation of health and mental health diagnoses, and the need for further research that elucidates the reasons behind lower satisfaction ratings.     

Are patients with coexisting mental disorders more likely to receive CABG surgery from low-quality cardiac surgeons? The experience in New York State

BACKGROUND: Presence of a mental disorder has been shown to be associated with reduced access to medical and surgical services. Little is known, however, about the relationship between mental disorders and the quality of medical/surgical care received. METHODS: We analyzed New York State hospital discharge data between 2001 and 2003 and New York's publicly-released Cardiac Surgery Report of surgeons' risk-adjusted mortality rate, to evaluate whether differences exist between persons with and without mental disorders (specifically, psychiatric and/or substance-use disorders) in receiving care from low-quality and high-quality surgeons performing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries. RESULTS: Controlling for individual demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics, persons with any mental disorder (n = 3211) were more likely than others (n = 36,628) to be treated by low-quality cardiac surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28, P = 0.023), whose reported risk-adjusted mortality rates were significantly higher than the state average CABG mortality rate. Compared with patients without mental disorders, patients with psychiatric disorders (n = 2651) showed an increased likelihood of being treated by these low-quality surgeons (OR = 1.36, P = 0.008). In addition, patients with both substance-use and psychiatric disorders (n = 113), but not substance-use alone (n = 447), were more likely to receive care from surgeons in the high-mortality quintile group (OR = 1.76, P = 0.024). There was no significant association between each type of mental disorders and the likelihood of being treated by a low-mortality, high-quality cardiac surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: New York State patients with mental disorders, especially psychiatric disorders, are more likely to receive CABG surgery from low-quality cardiac surgeons. No evidence suggests that these patients are disadvantaged in access to high-quality cardiac surgeons.     

The recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of mental disorders by primary care physicians

A valid and reliable vignette-based measure of DSM-III psychiatric diagnostic knowledge was administered to practicing primary care physicians (PCPs; generally, internal and family practice medicine) and mental health professionals (MHPs, in psychiatry and psychology). Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment recommendations were measured for 14 different disorders. Contrary to other reports, PCPs consistently recognized the presence of mental disorder and did so virtually as well as MHPs, although both PCPs and MHPs showed more under-recognition than over-recognition. Diagnostic accuracy, however, was substantially lower, with that of MHPs exceeding PCPs for the general classes of affective, anxiety, somatic, and personality disorders, but not for the organic disorders. In making specific diagnoses, significantly fewer PCPs than MHPs gave an accurate diagnosis for eight of the 14 disorders: dysthymic disorder, major depression with psychotic features, agoraphobia with panic attacks (marginally), generalized anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with anxious mood (marginally), psychologic factors affecting physical condition, and two personality disorders. Overall, PCPs were most accurate in identifying organic disorders (81% correct), least accurate in identifying the personality disorders (14%), and intermediate in identifying the affective (47%), anxiety (49%), and somatic disorders (49%). In most cases, both PCPs and MHPs preferred referral to treatment in primary care, but more PCPs than MHPs recommended treatment in primary care for certain anxiety and somatic disorders. Some differences in the recommended use of antidepressants in primary care were also found. Implications for the provision of mental health care by primary care physicians are discussed.     

Psychiatric emergencies in the elderly

Psychiatric disorders are best managed by interdisciplinary teams of psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, social workers, and psychologists. Some Emergency Departments have access to such psychiatric services either in the hospital or in associated clinics or community mental health centers. Unfortunately, many are not staffed with mental health professionals or such expertise is available only on a limited basis, particularly on evenings and weekends. Therefore, one or more members of the Emergency Department staff should have specialized psychiatric training and experience. We have reviewed the format for conducting a psychiatric history and mental status examination and have discussed the most common emergency psychiatric disorders of the elderly and their management in the Emergency Department. In order to assess and treat elderly psychiatric patients properly, emergency personnel must be aware of the medical disorders associated with psychiatric illness and must be prepared to initiate treatment quickly and appropriately. For most patients, emergency intervention is the first step in ensuring that a correct diagnosis is made and that ongoing psychiatric treatment is arranged through timely consultation and referral.     

Psychiatric disorder in a palliative care unit

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown varying prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders in patients with terminal illness. On average it is expected that between 33 and 50% of this population will require psychological support. Despite this, up to 50% of psychiatric disorders remain unrecognized by medical and nursing personnel. The objectives of this study were to assess clinically the prevalence of psychiatric disorder occurring in the study population and to ascertain whether this disorder had been detected and treated prior to admission. METHOD: Following assessment of the patient, the presence or absence of a psychiatric diagnosis was determined according to the criteria laid down by the ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine (62%) patients met ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorder. Thirty-three (24%) patients had dual diagnoses. The commonest diagnoses were organic disorders followed by neurotic and stress-related disorders and depression (27%, 16% and 16%, respectively). One hundred and twenty-six (91%) patients with a psychiatric disorder had been symptomatic on admission. Of these, 35% were receiving incorrect or inadequate treatment. CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of the palliative care population studied had comorbid psychiatric illness. One-third of these disorders had not been identified or treated appropriately prior to admission. Future research needs to identify effective methods of detecting and diagnosing these disorders to enable early and efficient treatment programmes be initiated.     

Anxiety disorders in the elderly

Great strides have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety disorders during the past 15 years. Because elderly patients are particularly prone to these disorders but often reluctant to discuss them, the primary care physician needs to be alert for symptoms and knowledgeable about differential diagnosis. The authors present recent information that can help in treating these patients and recognizing when psychiatric referral is warranted.