A phase I study of weekly topotecan and Paclitaxel in previously treated epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients

OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported on the feasibility of weekly topotecan as single-agent therapy in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bolus intravenous (IV) topotecan combined with weekly paclitaxel in a comparable patient population. METHODS: Previously treated ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease and/or elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) received (as second-line or third-line therapy) weekly 30-min bolus IV topotecan starting at 2 mg/m(2) combined with weekly paclitaxel starting at a dose of 60 mg/m(2). In this intrapatient dose-escalation study, topotecan and paclitaxel were escalated in parallel until the MTD was reached, defined as the first dose level at which >or= 2 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 26 patients were evaluable for toxicity and received a total of 306 weeks of therapy (median, 13 weeks; range, 5 to 33 weeks). No significant dose-limiting toxicity was observed up to a weekly bolus IV topotecan dose of 3 mg/m(2) and a concurrent paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2). The MTD was topotecan 3.5 mg/m(2) plus 90 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicities included anemia and fatigue, with 10 of 21 patients receiving epoetin alfa for grade 3 or 4 anemia; only 1 patient required a blood transfusion. Two patients had a treatment delay of at least 1 week and only 1 patient required a dose reduction to maintain the weekly schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, the recommended initial dose for this novel regimen is topotecan 3 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). Further investigation of the efficacy of weekly topotecan plus paclitaxel in less heavily pretreated patients is warranted.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

This study aimed to determine the first-cycle maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and then assess the feasibility of this dose over multiple cycles.

Methods

Beginning at an intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin dose area under the curve (AUC) of 5 and a fixed intravenous dose of 175 mg/m² paclitaxel, patients were entered on a dose-escalating phase evaluating first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After estimating the MTD, cohorts of 20 patients were then entered in an expanded phase to evaluate DLT over four cycles.

Results

Twenty-one patients were entered on the dose-escalating phase. A first-cycle MTD of carboplatin at AUC 8 was tolerated although thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting over multiple cycles. An additional 69 patients were treated in expanded cohorts. Only 5/90 (5.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of a port problem. Four-cycle DLT required de-escalation to a carboplatin AUC of 6, and even at that dose, there were 14 dose-limiting toxic effects in 40 patients (35%). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were due to neutropenia, and 6 were due to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Six cycles of therapy were completed in 75% of eligible patients, but dose adjustments were required.

Conclusions

The first-cycle MTD did not predict the tolerability of this regimen over multiple cycles. Using an IP carboplatin dose of AUC 6 in combination with paclitaxel, the regimen can be administered with a high completion rate over multiple cycles. Because neutropenia is a frequent DLT, the addition of hematopoietic growth factors may permit a high completion rate while maintaining this dose.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Based on the activity and tolerability of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, we conducted a phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in chemotherapy naive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Three schedules were studied: paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days; paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days with liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days; and weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin (AUC=5) every 21 days and liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days. The paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on an every 3-4 week schedule and 60 mg/m(2) when administered weekly. Based on the frequency of neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and > or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, the starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin of 20 mg/m(2) was escalated to determine the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 210 (21-day) cycles were administered to 37 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred when liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 40 mg/m(2). Because of treatment-related delays resulting in decreased paclitaxel/carboplatin dose intensity, administration was modified to be given every 21 days, with liposomal doxorubicin given every 42 days. Since neutropenia was the DLT of this schedule, the schema was further modified to administer paclitaxel weekly; however, weekly administration was inconsistent because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin (AUC=5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) are tolerable without supportive therapy. The usual dose intensity of paclitaxel/carboplatin was maintained by administering liposomal doxorubicin every other cycle.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the feasibility of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin, and IP paclitaxel in women with newly diagnosed Stages II-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IP on day 1 and paclitaxel IP 60 mg/m² on day 8. A standard 3 + 3 design was used in the escalation phase. A two-stage group sequential design with 20 patients at the MTD was used in the feasibility phase. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was assessed pre and post treatment.

Results

Patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m² IV and carboplatin IP from AUC 5-7 on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8. The MTD was estimated at carboplatin AUC 6 IP and 25 patients enrolled at this dose level. Within the first 4 cycles, seven (35%) of twenty evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 3 neutropenic fever (3), > 2 week delay due to ANC recovery (1), grade 3 LFT (1), and grade 3 infection (1). De-escalation to paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV was given to improve the safety. After six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles without a DLT, bevacizumab was added and six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles with one DLT (grade 3 hyponatremia).

Conclusions

Paclitaxel at 175 mg/m² IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP day 8 yield 18-56% patients with DLTs. The tolerability of the regimen in combination with bevacizumab was indicated in a small cohort.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.     

Phase I study of daily cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Chemoradiation based on cisplatin is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma; however, the optimal scheduling and dosing have still not been established. This study was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin for daily administration during pelvic radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Fourteen patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma and 13 who required postoperative RT were registered. A low dose of cisplatin was given daily concurrently with RT. Cisplatin dosing was started at 6.0 mg/m(2)/day, which was incremented by 0.5 mg/m(2)/day. RT was delivered at 2 Gy/day to a total dose of 50 Gy. The MTD was defined as the dose level immediately below that causing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in over one-third of treated patients. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated with a maximum of six escalating dose levels. In 22/25 patients (88%), cisplatin was administered continuously as planned without interruption. The MTD was determined to be 8 mg/m(2) and the DLT was indicated by the onset of neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Daily cisplatin, at 8 mg/m(2)/day, is a well-tolerated radiosensitizer in cervical carcinoma patients.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel, topotecan, cisplatin and Filgrastim in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian epithelial malignancies: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: To determine a recommended dose level (RDL) of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan in women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer as a possible experimental arm in a future Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III study. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III or IV disease were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, followed 2 h later by cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1. Topotecan was administered on consecutive days as a 30-minute infusion, beginning after cisplatin on day 1, receiving either 5 days beginning at 0.3 mg/m2 (cohort 1), or 3 days beginning at 0.5 mg/m2 (cohort 2). Treatment was given every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. RESULTS: Forty-five evaluable patients were enrolled in the two cohorts. Thrombocytopenia and prolonged neutropenia were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Dose-limiting neutropenia was seen at the first dose level, thus all subsequent dose escalations included Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 1 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2 daily x 5 with Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 2 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily x 3 with Filgrastim. CONCLUSION: In women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan is feasible. However, this treatment requires the use of Filgrastim and attenuated dosing of topotecan in both a 5-day and 3-day topotecan infusion schedule.     

Intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy using carboplatin: a phase I analysis in ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Cyclic platinum-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy has proven to be effective after optimal surgical cytoreduction in ovarian carcinoma. Hyperthermia is directly cytotoxic and enhances chemotherapy tumoricidal effects. This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carboplatin used intraoperatively as intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC), the effect on postoperative systemic chemotherapy administration, and the potential for repeat IPHC at second look surgery. METHODS: Using the ThermoChem HT System, escalating doses of carboplatin (400, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 mg/m(2)) were administered intraoperatively as IPHC with a perfusion time of 90 min. A subgroup of eight patients that received initial IPHC and subsequent systemic chemotherapy underwent second look reassessment surgery with IPHC. RESULTS: The first 4 dose levels were well tolerated without dose-defining toxicity. The initial two patients treated at 1200 mg/m(2) developed grade 4 myelosuppression thus defining the MTD at 1000 mg/m(2). Newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients receiving the initial IPHC at the MTD defined above completed standard systemic chemotherapy with six courses of systemic chemotherapy. Eight patients having initial IPHC and systemic chemotherapy subsequently had repeat IPHC performed at second look laparotomy without grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Four patients were found to have extensive adhesions at the time of second look reassessment surgery yet completed IPHC. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for intraperitoneal carboplatin administered as IPHC was established at 1000 mg/m(2). IPHC at the initial cytoreductive procedure did not preclude subsequent systemic chemotherapy. In addition, repetitive IPHC was feasible at second look reassessment surgery.     

Docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gynecological tumors. A phase I/II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO-OVAR) Ovarian Cancer Study Group

OBJECTIVES: We performed a phase I-II study in patients with ovarian and other gynecological cancers to determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of docetaxel/carboplatin. METHODS: Thirty patients were treated in three cohorts with carboplatin (AUC 5) and escalating docetaxel (60, 75 and 90 mg/m2), administered intravenously on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Premedication consisted of 16 mg dexamethasone per os on day -1, and +1 and 4 mg intravenously before docetaxel. RESULTS: A total of 6, 11 and 12 patients were eligible and treated on dose levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At docetaxel 90 mg/m2, febrile and prolonged neutropenia were dose-limiting, and 75 mg/m2 with carboplatin AUC 5 was considered the MTD. Prolonged neutropenia occurred in two, four and nine patients of dose levels 1-3, respectively, and febrile neutropenia in 2, 1, and 2 patients of dose level 1-3. Thrombocytopenia grade 4 was observed in one patient of dose level 1. Non-hematological toxicity including neuropathy was usually mild across all dose levels. Overall response rate was 73%. Median time to progression was 18.0 months, and median overall survival will exceed 24.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel/carboplatin can be safely administered to patients with gynecological cancer despite substantial myelotoxicity and appears to be active in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Low neurotoxicity offers an option for comparison with paclitaxel-containing regimens.     

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4-6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50-80 mg/m(2) cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.     

Phase I study of intraperitoneal carboplatin as adjuvant therapy in early ovarian cancer

Early stage poor-risk ovarian cancer patients are at considerable risk for recurrent disease. Adjuvant radio- or chemotherapy has been found to improve disease-free and overall survival. Carboplatin, a second generation platinum, is documented comparable in efficacy to cisplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The toxicity profile is different from that of cisplatin. Dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression. The incidence and grade of renal and neurological toxicity is much lower compared with cisplatin, as is nausea and vomiting. Carboplatin given intraperitoneally (ip) is shown to have a favorable theoretical therapeutic advantage compared with iv administration since the peak peritoneal cavity/peak plasma concentration ratio is 18. Patients with early stage ovarian cancer seem suitable for carboplatin ip treatment. The study was designed to find the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). Three new patients were given two courses at each dose level. The MTD found was confirmed with further patients. Carboplatin was given in 2 liters of glucose via a subcutaneous implantable port without removal of fluid from the cavity. The starting dose was 300 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Leukocyte and platelet counts were reconstituted within 28 days in all cases. One case of severe but transient nephrotoxicity was observed. MTD was determined to 500 mg/m2.     

Radiation therapy with concomitant paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a phase I/II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy concurrent with whole pelvic irradiation in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Consenting patients with stage IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB and IVA carcinoma of the cervix (all cell types) were eligible for this phase I/II trial. Chemotherapy agents were administered in escalating doses to cohorts of three patients at each dose level, pending evaluation of toxicities from the previous dose level. RESULTS: Thirty-five eligible women were enrolled on this study, of whom 13 comprised the phase I component. The MTD was determined to be cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 administered weekly for six cycles with external beam radiation therapy. An additional 21 patients were enrolled in the phase II component at the previously determined MTD, yielding a total of 22 patients at the MTD, of whom 19 were evaluable. Among the evaluable patients treated at the MTD, two had grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (representing 5 of 113 cycles administered to this cohort) and seven experienced grade 3 or 4 neutrophil toxicity, none occurring prior to the fourth cycle. Thrombocytopenia was rare. Radiation therapy was successfully completed in 52% of patients at 8 weeks and in 79% of patients at 9 weeks, with a median of 59 days. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy concurrent with whole pelvic irradiation can be safely administered at the described MTD.     

A phase I trial of prolonged oral etoposide and liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES: In an effort to explore second-line therapy in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma, a phase I trial combining prolonged oral etoposide and liposomal doxorubicin was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. METHODS: Liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously over 1 h followed by oral etoposide at 50 mg/m(2)/day beginning on day 2. In the first phase of accrual, the number of days of oral etoposide was increased until its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined based on hematologic toxicity. In the second phase, etoposide was given at the MTD while the dose of liposomal doxorubicin was escalated until its maximum tolerated dose was reached based on hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a maximum of 12 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, absolute neutrophil count <1000/microl or platelets <50,000 during treatment with etoposide, or > or =grade 3 mucositis/stomatitis, palmar-plantar erythrodyesthesia, or rash. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were accrued to the study's first phase, and 3 were accrued to the second phase. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred with 14 days of oral etoposide in combination with liposomal doxorubicin at 20 mg/m(2). Efforts to escalate the dose of liposomal doxorubicin to 30 mg/m(2) in combination with 12 days of oral etoposide at 50 mg/m(2) resulted in dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. Five of 17 (29%; 95% CI: 13-53%) evaluable patients experienced a response. CONCLUSION: The regimen of oral etoposide at 50 mg/m(2)/day for 12 days in combination with liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) is tolerable without supportive therapy. While this dose of oral etoposide has demonstrated activity as a single agent in ovarian cancer, liposomal doxorubicin has only been effective in ovarian cancer at higher doses. There are no immediate plans to study this combination further.     

Pharmacokinetics of Taxol Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer

TaxolwasanewlydevelopeddrugwithuniqueeffectofinducingexcessivePOlymerizationoftubulinanddys-hationalnd.rot.bul..['J.Taxolhaddemonstratedrnaoredivityinpatient8withadvancedandplatinum-resistantovarian.an...[2].Thisstudyisaimedonevaluatingthepharmacokinet-icsofintraperitonealuseoftaxol.lMatemianoMbel.lClinicalmaterialsPatientswithhistologicallydocumentedadvancedovdrianepithelialcancerbylaparoscopywereenterintothistrial.MeasurablediseasewasreqUiredforthetreatmentproo-col.Additionaleligibilityc…     

Phase I trial of escalating doses of topotecan in combination with a fixed dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in women with müllerian malignancies

BACKGROUND: Topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) interact with topoisomerase I and II (topo I and II), respectively, with schedule dependent, and potentially synergistic cytotoxicity. OBJECTIVES: Define dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan delivered by 72-h infusion administered immediately after Doxil delivered at a fixed dose (30 mg/m(2)) in a cohort of women with recurrent müllerian malignancies. METHODS: Topotecan dose was escalated from 0.5 mg/m(2)/day for 3 days in 0.2 mg/m(2)/day increments with treatment repeated every 21 days. Eligibility criteria required ECOG < or = 2 and no more than four prior lines of chemotherapy. No dose reductions were allowed in the first two cycles to allow evaluation of cutaneous toxicity. RESULTS: Between November 2000 and August 2002, 18 patients were enrolled. Median age 59 (40-71) years. Patients received a median 1 (1-6) cycles of chemotherapy, with 39 cycles of treatment delivered at DL 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response. At dose level 2, dose-limiting toxicity consisted of nausea and vomiting, mucositis, cutaneous toxicity, and neutropenia. There was no clinically significant cardiac toxicity. There were no radiologically confirmed partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: Doxil 30 mg/m(2) and topotecan 0.5 mg/m(2)/day by 72-h infusion (total dose 1.5 mg/m(2)), although a rational combination of cytotoxic therapies, have limited clinical activity.     

A phase II evaluation of Temozolomide in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: To assess the antitumor activity of Temozolomide, a novel alkylating agent, in patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma who have failed other second-line chemotherapy agents. To identify the nature and degree of toxicity of Temozolomide in this group of patients. METHODS: Temozolomide was administered orally at an initial dose of 150 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, every 4 weeks. If the initial course was tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity, then the dose was increased to 200 mg/m(2). Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 3. Hematologic toxicity was encountered in 26% of patients and was manageable. There were no complete or partial responses. One patient had stable disease with significant improvement in her performance status while on treatment. CONCLUSION: This dose and schedule of Temozolomide had insignificant activity in this heavily pretreated group of patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma.     

Phase I clinical trial of weekly paclitaxel, weekly carboplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy for primary cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES: Standard primary treatment for locally advanced cervix cancer is radiation (RT) with concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). Incomplete local control and the appearance of distant disease herald poor survival and warrant evaluation of new primary strategies. Paclitaxel and carboplatin are active agents in recurrent cervical carcinoma, have potent, synergistic in vitro radiosensitization, and are cytotoxic in weekly schedules. This study was done to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer. METHODS: Women with primary, previously untreated, squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the cervix, FIGO stage IB(2) to IVA, negative para-aortic lymph nodes, adequate organ function and performance status were eligible. Pelvic RT (45 Gy over 5 weeks--180 cGy/day, four-field) was followed by two brachytherapy applications (Point A low dose rate (LDR): 90 Gy, high dose rate (HDR): 75 Gy). Concurrent weekly CT was paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) and carboplatin, starting at AUC 1.5 and escalating in three-patient cohorts by AUC 0.5 (Max AUC 3.5). Dose escalation followed a 4-week observation period for toxicity. A grade III-IV toxicity prompted up to three additional patients per dose level. A second event defined DLT. CT was administered concurrently throughout brachytherapy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and treated over four dose levels until DLT was reached. Median age was 44 years (range, 23-70); stages: IB2: 1, IIB: 9, IIIA: 1, IIIB: 4. Median RT treatment time was 61 days (range, 55-79). Fourteen patients received brachytherapy (LDR: 8, HDR: 6), and one received external RT only due to cervical stenosis. The median number of weekly CT cycles was seven (range, 6-7). One CT dose was dropped in one patient for a grade II thrombocytopenia. One grade III ANC was observed at dose level II (AUC 2.0) but not seen in three additional patients. At dose level IV (AUC 3.0), two grade III-IV ANC toxicities were observed in two patients (DLT). Nine patients had grade II anemia. One patient had grade III anemia. Grade III/IV nonhematologic toxicity was rare (1/15 GI-nausea/vomiting, 1/15 pneumonia, 1/15 hypokalemia). The MTD of carboplatin is AUC 2.5 with paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2). Median follow-up is 17 months; three patients have recurred and two have died. The estimated 2-year PFS and OS are 80% and 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin chemoradiation is feasible and active. The MTD for a phase II trial is 50 mg/m(2) and AUC 2.5, respectively.     

A phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and every 3 weeks of carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel administered weekly in equal cumulative doses is associated with less hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity than an every 3-week administration. We studied weekly paclitaxel and 3-week carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS: Paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) over 1 h in combination with carboplatin at an AUC of 5 was administered on day 1. Subsequent paclitaxel doses, modified based on the day of treatment ANC, were administered on days 8 and 15. Paclitaxel dose reductions to 75% of prior dose were performed for chemotherapy delays or toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were studied. The median age was 59 (range 42-80). The median platinum-free interval was 12 months (range 7-129 months). A median of six courses (range 1-13) was administered. Paclitaxel dose reductions to 60 mg/m(2) were required in 85% of the patients. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were seen in 5 and 0 patients, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia were seen in 14 and 1 patients, respectively. One patient was hospitalized for neutropenic fever. Twenty of 26 (77%) evaluable patients have responded with 15 patients (58%) achieving a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) in combination with carboplatin at an AUC of 5 is well tolerated and active in potentially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma.     

国产紫杉醇对晚期卵巢癌患者腹腔化疗药代动力学的研究

目的：研究国产紫杉醇腹腔用药的药代动力学及其副作用。方法：对８例初治晚期卵巢上皮性癌应用国产紫杉醇１７５ｍｇ／ｍ２作腹腔化疗，３ｗ１次，观察副作用。对其中６例进行药代动力学研究，在用药前、后取腹水及血浆测定紫杉醇的药物浓度，测定药代动力学参数。结果：腹水中的药物浓度及浓度—时间曲线下面积远高于血浆中的相应情况。紫杉醇代谢模型为二室型，具有药代动力学优势。其副作用主要是骨髓抑制及腹痛，但较静脉用药的副作用小。结论：国产紫杉醇腹腔用药具有药代动力学优势，副作用小。     

A dose-escalating study of weekly bolus topotecan in previously treated ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan is an established topoisomerase I inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer. Myelotoxicity and suboptimal patient convenience associated with daily topotecan, however, have prompted investigators to explore alternate regimens, including a weekly regimen of topotecan. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given as a weekly bolus in previously treated ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Second- and third-line ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease or elevated cancer antigen 125 received weekly bolus topotecan intravenously starting at 1.5 mg/m(2). Topotecan was escalated in dose increments of 0.5 mg/m(2) every 21 days as tolerability allowed. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 patients were evaluable for safety and tolerability. No notable toxicity was observed with weekly topotecan doses < 4 mg/m(2). Additionally, there was an absence of dose-limiting myelotoxicity and thrombocytopenia with weekly topotecan. The MTD of weekly topotecan without the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was 4 mg/m(2), with grade 2 anemia, chronic fatigue, and grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity limiting further dose escalation. Weekly topotecan also demonstrated antitumor activity at doses >2 mg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a well-tolerated, weekly regimen of topotecan (4 mg/m(2), with a maximum recommended dose of 6 mg/m(2)) provides the basis for further investigation in phase II studies of single-agent and combination regimens in previously treated ovarian cancer patients.