Paediatric community vision screening with combined optometric and orthoptic care: a 64-month review

We report a new model of community-based secondary vision screening and demonstrate that a high proportion of children can be effectively managed in such a clinic without referral to the hospital eye service (HES). We performed a 64-month retrospective study of a secondary vision screening clinic providing the combined skills of an optometrist and orthoptist in a community setting. Particular attention was given to the diagnosis and management of children not referred to the HES. During this period, 1755 children were sent appointments and 74% (1300) attended the clinic. The community orthoptist and school nurses referred 53% of the patients and health visitors, general practitioners and community medical officers made 32% of the clinic referrals. Spectacles were prescribed for 41% of the children and 8% were prescribed patching. Sixteen per cent of the children were referred on to the HES. This model of care using the combined expertise of the orthoptist and optometrist is able to diagnose and manage the majority of children who have failed primary vision screening and avoids unnecessary referrals to the HES.     

Final Visual Outcomes and Treatment Received for Children Referred from a UK Primary School Visual Screening Program: A Comparison of An Orthoptic-led Program with Orthoptic-delivered Services

There is little published evidence relating to the final visual acuity of children who are identified as having reduced vision at a school screening program. The school vision screening program in Leeds (led by an orthoptist but delivered by health care support workers within the school nursing team) is examined.

Results: 7807 children were screened in school between November 1, 2013, and September 1, 2014. Of these, 319 (4%) failed the screen and were referred to the general optometry service and 547 (7%) were referred to the Children’s Community Eye Service (CCES). Of the children who were referred to the CCES, 79.4% attended their first appointment and 86.4% were positive referrals. Of the children with reduced vision, 31 (8.3%) were found to have a manifest strabismus or eye movement disorder; 75 (20% of the positive referrals) required occlusion therapy for amblyopia; 52.6% of those with initially reduced vision obtained good visual acuity following spectacle correction alone within an 18- to 24-week refractive adaptation period. Of those who completed their treatment, 92.9% had vision within normal limits for their age in both eyes at discharge. Of children referred from vision screening who were found to have a defect, 64.6% had that treatment completed within three visits.

Conclusion: Vision screening identifies individuals with treatable vision defects who have a greater than 90% chance of achieving normal visual acuity with good compliance to treatment. Vision screening programs led by an orthoptist but delivered by well-trained and monitored screeners can be of as good quality as a screening program delivered by orthoptists.     

Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four Photoscreening: results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children.

INTRODUCTION: Photoscreening programs for preschool vision screening have been promoted by Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF) via their 17 Core Four grant project awards since 1999. Results from 15 Core Four grant programs in the United States and one in Taiwan are presented here. METHODS: Photoscreening was modeled after the Tennessee program and instituted statewide in each area. Programs were given latitude with respect to screening instrument and referral criteria, but a partnering academic institution and medical director were expected. Preschool children were screened by volunteers; referred children were examined by community optometrists and ophthalmologists who returned results to each program's coordinating center. Outcome data included number of children screened, referral rate, follow-up rate, and positive predictive value, which was generally determined using AAPOS-defined vision screening criteria. RESULTS: All but one program used the MTI photoscreener (it chose not to participate); photoscreening referral criteria were standard for 13 programs. Through December 2004, more than 400,000 preschool children had been screened. The referral rate for programs using the MTI photoscreener averaged 5.2% (range, 3.7-12.6%). The predictive value of a positive photoscreen was 80%. Overall, 54% of referred children received follow-up examinations. Follow-up rate was the largest variable: 4 programs, screening nearly 250,000 children, had follow-up rates 70% or greater; 10 programs had follow-up data from fewer than 40% of referred children. CONCLUSIONS: Volunteer-led photoscreening programs can be instituted in other locations, including overseas, with high levels of effectiveness. Limitations include the possibility of poor success and variable attention to follow-up.     

Detection of vision impairment in people admitted to aged care assessment centres

Vision is not routinely tested when the health of older people is assessed, and the aim of this study was to detect older people with vision impairment for referral to appropriate eye care services. People admitted for assessment and or rehabilitation in three aged care assessment centres had distance and near visual acuity assessed with a simplified vision test. A pinhole test was used when necessary. Referral criteria were distance visual acuity of less than 6/12; near vision of less than N8, and people with diabetes who had not attended a dilated fundus examination in the last 2 years. Visual acuity results were obtained in 93% of patients (685/735). Those unable to perform the vision test were very ill or had severe cognitive impairment. Forty-three per cent of patients (266/646) had impaired vision and, of these, 70.6% (188/266) were referred to eye care specialists. Forty-five per cent were referred to ophthalmologists, 36% to optometrists and 20% to low vision services. This significant proportion of patients with poor vision suggests that vision screening is warranted.     

Referral outcomes from a vision screening program for school-aged children

ObjectiveTo assess ocular diagnoses and follow-up patterns of children referred for a comprehensive eye examination after a school-based vision screening program.DesignRetrospective chart review.ParticipantsStudents in grades K–5 from the School District of Philadelphia public schools screened by The Wills Eye Vision Screening Program for Children between January 2014 and June 2015.MethodsChildren with subnormal best-corrected visual acuity or other ocular conditions were referred to the Wills Eye pediatric ophthalmology service. A social worker assisted parents/guardians of referred children in scheduling an appointment and navigating insurance/payment issues. Measured outcomes included demographic information, ocular diagnoses, treatments, and follow-up patterns.ResultsOf 10 726 children screened, 509 (5%) were referred for a follow-up eye examination. Of these 509 children, only 127 (25%) completed a referral eye examination with parental consent. Most children (58%) were diagnosed with more than one eye condition, including refractive error (76%), amblyopia (43%), strabismus (16%), and anisometropia (13%). Other conditions included macular hypoplasia, ptosis, and other congenital anomalies.ConclusionsThis program discovered and addressed potentially vision-threatening conditions in underserved children susceptible to amblyopia by offering social worker services and financial support to enable referred children to complete an eye examination. Contact by the social worker required consent. Obtaining such consent proved to be a barrier to connecting children with the recommended consultation.     

A new school-based program to provide eyeglasses: ChildSight

OBJECTIVE: To address the unmet need for glasses encountered in an urban school setting by developing and implementing a school-based, cost-effective program that provides appropriate spectacle correction to needy children. METHODS: A total of 5851 students 9 to 15 years of age in 4 middle schools in northern Manhattan were screened for vision. Those with vision worse than 20/40 were examined, given glasses if appropriate, or referred for additional evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 5851 children screened, 1614 (28%) had a failing result, with visual acuity less than 20/40 in the worse eye. Of this group, 1082 were given glasses that were assembled at the school within 1 hour of testing. Ten percent of the group that required glasses already had them, and the remaining were referred for a complete ophthalmic examination that was completed in 58 cases. Only 14 of these had vision loss unrelated to refractive error. CONCLUSIONS: The program successfully treated 88.3% of the children within the school who needed glasses. Given that only 10% of children who needed glasses had them, it indicates a huge need to provide glasses to at least a million children in this age group in the United States.     

Review of preschool vision screening referrals in South Auckland, New Zealand

Background: Limited data are available on the causes of visual impairment in preschool children in New Zealand. We aimed to review demographic and visual parameters in children referred to the Ophthalmology Department, Manukau Super Clinic from vision screening programs in South Auckland. Methods: Retrospective medical record review of 131 children, aged three to five years, referred from community‐based vision screening programs to the Ophthalmology Department for further assessment. Medical records were reviewed to determine: the reason for referral; findings from ophthalmic assessments; treatment received; and visual acuity at the final visit. The main outcome measures were the cause of visual impairment in children referred from preschool vision screening and the visual acuity at the final follow‐up visit. Results: Thirty‐eight (29.0 per cent) children were discharged after their initial assessment as false positive referrals. Almost half (45.5 per cent) of the children were prescribed glasses for the correction of refractive error, amblyopia or strabismus. Twenty‐nine (22.1 per cent) children were diagnosed with amblyopia with an average follow‐up period of 17.5 ± 2.7 months. In general, compliance with therapy for amblyopia was poor with 48.3 per cent non‐compliant with their prescribed treatment regimen. Despite this, visual outcomes were good with an average final visual acuity in the amblyopic eye of 0.294 ± 0.231 logMAR (Snellen 6/12). Conclusions: The ‘positive predictive value’ for the Counties‐Manukau preschool vision screening program was 47.4 per cent, suggesting that the visual acuity measurements alone produce a significant number of false positive results. In children diagnosed with amblyopia, early detection and intervention showed significant improvement in vision in the amblyopic eye, with many children also showing improved binocular function.     

Preschool vision screening: outcome of children referred to the hospital eye service.

AIMS: To assess the outcome of children referred to the hospital eye service (HES) from an orthoptist based preschool vision screening programme. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of children referred from screening during a 2 year period. Children were screened by community orthoptists at 3 1/2 years of age. The main outcome measures were (1) HES findings for children referred from screening, and (2) visual outcome for amblyopic children after completion of treatment. RESULTS: The attendance rate at screening was 79.3% (6794 children): 348 children (5.1% of those screened) were referred to the HES. The HES findings were refractive error (32.9%), amblyopia (29.9%), false positive referral (20.1%), strabismus (13.2%), and other ocular disorders (3.9%). The positive predictive value of screening was 79.9%. Screening detected 48 children with straight eyed amblyopia and 43 children with strabismic amblyopia. A visual acuity of 6/9 or better in the amblyopic eye was achieved by 87.2% of straight eyed amblyopes and 64.3% of strabismic amblyopes (chi 2 = 5.27, p = 0.02). Residual amblyopia of 6/24 or worse occurred in only 5.6% of amblyopic children. CONCLUSION: Most amblyopic children detected by preschool vision screening achieve a good visual outcome with treatment. While treatment earlier in the sensitive period might be expected to give improved results, it remains to be demonstrated that preschool screening results in a better outcome than screening at school entry. Preschool vision screening also detects a significant number of children without amblyopia who have reduced vision due to refractive errors. This group of children must be included in any analysis of the cost effectiveness of preschool vision screening.     

Through our children's eyes—The public health impact of the vision screening requirements for Indiana school children

BackgroundThe vision screening of preschool and school children is a widely accepted procedure to detect vision problems that can interfere with learning. The Indiana General Assembly requires the annual vision screening with the Modified Clinical Technique (MCT) of all children upon their enrollment in either kindergarten or the first grade, with the exception of schools that apply for and receive waivers to conduct only a distance Snellen chart screening.MethodsIn association with the Indiana State Department of Health, the Indiana University School of Optometry conducted an analysis of statewide school screening data on 36,967 grade 1 children from 139 of the 294 Indiana school corporations that submitted data for the 2000–2001 school year to examine differences in referral rate by screening method, the socioeconomic status of children screened, and academic performance.ResultsThe MCT was used by 125 of the school corporations, and some other technique was used by 14 school corporations. Significant differences were seen when comparing the mean referral rates of school corporations that conduct the MCT against school corporations that do not conduct the MCT (P = 0.001) and in the rate of referral by median family income of the children screened (P = 0.050). A median family income of $46,500 was identified as the level at which the income-specific difference in referral rates ceased to be significant (P = 0.074). In spite of an observed tendency toward a higher referral rate for children who performed below average on the standardized Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus (ISTEP+) exam, results were found to be not significant (P = 0.116) when comparing the percentage of grade 1 children referred to an eye care provider in 2000–2001 with their percentages of passing both the English/language arts and mathematics components of the 2002–2003 ISTEP+ exam (in grade 3).ConclusionSchools using the highly sensitive and specific MCT identified more visually at-risk children than schools using alternative, less sensitive vision screening techniques, and the percentage of grade 1 children referred to an eye care provider was higher for school corporations with lower median family incomes. Although statistically insignificant, the results indicate that students who fail the vision screening in grade 1 tend to be more at risk for poorer academic performance on standardized testing in grade 3.     

幼儿家长的儿童视觉保健意识调查

目的调查幼儿家长的儿童视觉保健意识,以便有效制订工作规划及采取科普宣教,达到对幼儿眼病早发现早治疗的目的.方法采用问卷调查方式,非选择抽样调查上海部分幼儿园的幼儿家长共2000人.问卷主要了解家长对小儿视觉的关心情况、就医意识、诊疗依从性及对各种"视觉保健特效药物及仪器"的看法等.结果40%6～50%的家长会有意识地主动关心小儿视觉的情况,12%的家长缺乏就医意识,"散瞳验光"、"戴眼镜治疗"的诊疗依从性为40%～50%,"手术治疗"的依从性为2%.结论要加强科普教育与宣传,增强患儿家长的儿童视觉保健意识.     

Status of eye health among tribal school children in South India

Purpose:Global trends show a high prevalence of refractive errors among children. The prevalence of vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive errors among school children is increasing and the need for management of other ocular conditions is also reported. This study presents the status of eye health and pattern of daily activities among the school children of a tribal location in Tamil Nadu, South India.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted in 13 schools of Karumandurai cluster, Salem district in Tamil Nadu, India. A three-phased comprehensive school screening protocol was conducted to understand the prevalence of vision impairment, refractive error, and other ocular conditions along with a survey about the daily activities of the children at school and home.Results:Among the 3655 children screened, the prevalence of vision impairment was found to be 0.62% (n = 23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.94) and prevalence of refractive error was 0.30% (n = 11, 95%CI 0.17–0.54), among which 0.11% (n = 4) were already wearing spectacles. A total of 44 children (1.20%; 95%CI 0.90–1.61) were found to have other ocular problems and among them, 14 (0.38%) had visual acuity less than 20/30 (6/9). Almost 84% of children required surgical or specialty eye care services. Vision impairment was more in children with other ocular conditions compared to refractive errors (P < 0.001).Conclusion:The prevalence of vision impairment and refractive errors in this tribal area was less. Ocular conditions were more prevalent than refractive errors in this tribal region with the majority of children needing specialty or surgical eye care services. This implies the need for access to secondary or tertiary eye care centers.     

Effectiveness of using teachers to screen eyes of school-going children in Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India

Aim:

To assess the effectiveness of teachers in a vision screening program for children in classes 5th to 12th attending school in two blocks of a district of north central India.

Materials and Methods:

Ophthalmic assistants trained school teachers to measure visual acuity and to identify obvious ocular abnormalities in children. Children with visual acuity worse than 20/30 in any eye and/or any obvious ocular abnormality were referred to an ophthalmic assistant. Ophthalmic assistants also repeated eye examinations on a random sample of children identified as normal (approximately 1%, n=543) by the teachers. Ophthalmic assistants prescribed spectacles to children needing refractive correction and referred children needing further examination to a pediatric ophthalmologist at the base hospital.

Results:

Five hundred and thirty teachers from 530 schools enrolled 77,778 children in the project and screened 68,833 (88.50%) of enrolled children. Teachers referred 3,822 children (4.91%) with eye defects for further examination by the ophthalmic assistant who confirmed eye defects in 1242 children (1.80% of all screened children). Myopia (n=410, 33.01%), Vitamin A deficiency (n=143, 11.51%) and strabismus (n=134, 10.79%) were the most common eye problems identified by the ophthalmic assistant. Ophthalmic assistants identified 57.97% referrals as false positives and 6.08% children as false negatives from the random sample of normal children. Spectacles were prescribed to 39.47% of children confirmed with eye defects.

Conclusions:

Primary vision screening by teachers has effectively reduced the workload of ophthalmic assistants. High false positive and false negative rates need to be studied further.     

Visual impairment in children with multiple disabilities in schools for children with special needs in South India

Purpose:To understand/assess ocular and functional vision impairment in children with multiple disabilities with a functional vision assessment battery in addition to standard ophthalmic examinations in an outreach setting.Methods:Seven schools for children with special needs, 243 children in total, were screened for ocular disorders and functional vision impairment through school camps.Results:Among them, 37% had refractive errors needing spectacle correction. With standard ocular testing methods, the visual impairment was around 32%, but when functional vision was assessed, the functional vision impairment amounted to 70% in these children. The presence of functional vision impairment was found to be independent of the associated disability. Assessment of visual capacities such as visual closure, saccade pursuits, optic ataxia, and developmental milestones early on can help in suspecting the presence of CVIConclusion:Children with multiple disabilities are more at risk of functional vision impairment, which significantly impairs their ability to function in daily life. A complete functional vision assessment becomes essential to plan early intervention for these children. The significant proportion of vision impairment and functional vision loss in our study indicates the need for coordinated structured programs to address vision-related problems in children with multiple disabilities.