Dysphagia Characteristics of Patients Post SARS-CoV-2 During Inpatient Rehabilitation

ObjectiveTo investigate dysphagia in patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation by summarizing clinical swallow evaluation and videofluoroscopic swallow study findings.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingUrban inpatient rehabilitation hospital.ParticipantsThe first inpatients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 (N=40) who participated in a videofluoroscopic swallow study.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresPatient characteristics upon admission (duration of intubation, tracheostomy status, comorbidities, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) completion at previous level of care); admission International Dysphagia Diet level (IDDSI); Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), dysphagia severity rating; penetration aspiration scale (PAS) rated during VFSS; and IDDSI level recommended after completion of VFSS.ResultsTwenty percent of patients had been evaluated by videofluoroscopy in acute care. Nineteen of 37 (51%) individuals were upgraded to IDDSI level 7 regular diet with level 0 thin liquids and achieved a FOIS of 7 after the completion of the VFSS. Five individuals (13%) received a diet downgrade or remained on the same diet recommendations from their admission. Total numerical score (TNS) of less than 170 on the MASA predicted presence of aspiration in 27% of patients (6 of 22). Seventy-two percent of the sample (16 of 22) had a TNS less than 170 but did not demonstrate any instances of aspiration. The odds of patients having a PAS of 3 or greater increased by approximately 15% (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.27; P=.013). Thus, with each additional day of intubation during acute care stay, there was a 15% greater likelihood of having airway invasion.ConclusionsInstrumental swallow evaluations are imperative to diagnose and treat dysphagia in the post-coronavirus disease population. Because of the heterogeneity of this population, high incidence of prolonged intubation, and limitations of the clinical swallowing evaluation, instrumental assessments need to be performed on a more consistent basis as infection prevention protocols evolve.     

Implementing a systematic care pathway for management of dysphagia after cardiothoracic surgery

ObjectivesThis longitudinal quality improvement study explored the impact of a new multidisciplinary dysphagia care pathway on swallow screening referrals, patient journeys and swallow outcomes in patients after cardiac surgery.Research methodologyThe new dysphagia care pathway consisted of i) nurse chart review triaging using established risk factors, ii) nurse swallow screening (including a cough reflex test and water swallow test) and iii) rapid referral routes to speech pathology. All patients referred for swallow screening in 2020 after the commencement of the new dysphagia care pathway were included (n = 114). Data was compared to two historical, published data sets at the research site (n-41 in 2012–2013 and n = 121 in 2013–2016).SettingCardiovascular intensive care unit.Results52% failed chart review and 29% failed cough reflex test. All patients who passed chart review and cough reflex test returned to a normal diet without need for speech pathology referral. Silent aspiration rates were high in those who failed chart review and the cough reflex test (42%, 43% respectively). For those who received a swallow screen, enteral feeding rates were 70% on first assessment and 27% by discharge from the unit in historical data (2013–2016). In comparison, in 2020, enteral feeding rates were 44% and 8% respectively.ConclusionsReferrals for nurse swallow screening and speech pathology increased following the introduction of the care pathway. There has been a reduction in enteral feeding rates and length of enteral feeding at discharge. High rates of silent aspiration in those who fail screening suggests stepwise nurse dysphagia screening successfully picks up at-risk patients.     

Identification of a simple screening tool for dysphagia in patients with stroke using factor analysis of multiple dysphagia variables.

OBJECTIVE: To identify a most useful and simple clinical screening tool to predict videofluoroscopic aspiration in patients with stroke.Design: Factor analysis of multiple dysphagia variables and sensitivity and specificity testing with chi-square test. PATIENTS: Sixty-one consecutive stroke patients with symptoms suggestive of dysphagia admitted to a university hospital and its 4 affiliated hospitals in Japan. METHODS: Factors were extracted from 6 oromotor examinations (lip closure, tongue movement, palatal elevation, gag reflex, voice quality and motor speech function), 2 swallow screen tests (saliva swallowing test and our modified water swallowing test using 30 ml of water) and 4 parameters evaluated with a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Sensitivity and specificity of each dysphagia-related variable was determined against aspiration in a videofluoroscopic swallow study. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed that cough/voice change in the water swallowing test and aspiration on videofluoroscopic swallow study belonged to the same factor. Chi-square analysis showed that cough/voice change in the water swallowing test was the only variable that was significantly associated with aspiration on videofluoroscopic swallow study, with a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 61-83%) and a specificity of 67% (CI: 55-79%) as a predictor of aspiration (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend our modified 30 ml water-swallowing test as a useful single task-screening tool to detect aspiration.     

A randomized controlled trail of combination therapy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and balloon dilatation in the treatment of radiation-induced dysphagia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Dysphagia is a most common complication induced by radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. This randomized controlled trail (RCT) was performed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of combination therapy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and balloon dilatation in the treatment of radiation-induced dysphagia in NPC patients. Sixty NPC patients with radiation-induced dysphagia were assigned to either the combination rehabilitation group (treatment group) or the routine rehabilitation group (control group) at random. Both groups were subjected to routine rehabilitation treatment, while the combination rehabilitation group also received combination therapy of NMES and balloon dilatation for 4 months. The water swallow test (WST) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were used to evaluate the severity of dysphagia. The treatment group showed a significant improvement in swallowing function when compared with the control group. When the WST was used, the efficacy rate (percentage of patients with excellent and effective results) of treatment group was higher than that of control group (90.1 vs. 76.3%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ² = 8.55, p = 0.036). When the VFSS was used, the videofluoroscopy results in our study showed that the values of oral transit time (OTT), swallow reaction time (SRT), pharyngeal transit time (PTT) and laryngeal closure duration (LCD) in treatment group were notably improved when compared with those in control group. In conclusion, combination rehabilitation treatment can improve swallow function in the treatment of radiation-induced dysphagia in NPC patients.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Dysphagia is also a most important complication associated with radiotherapy and may result in serious complications, such as aspiration pneumonia, and permanent or long-term feeding tube dependence which significantly decrease the quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (NPC).

• Rehabilitation treatment is the most important therapy scheme for radiation-induced dysphagia, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation and balloon dilatation are useful therapy method for dysphagia.

• Combination rehabilitation treatment can improve swallow function in the treatment of radiation-induced dysphagia in NPC.

     

Quantifying swallowing function after stroke: A functional dysphagia scale based on videofluoroscopic studies

OBJECTIVE: To develop a sensitive, specific scale for quantifying functional dysphagia in stroke patients, using results obtained from videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. DESIGN: Data collected from a serial oral and pharyngeal videofluoroscopic swallowing study. SETTING: A dysphagia clinic in a department of rehabilitation medicine at a tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred three consecutively admitted stroke patients. INTERVENTIONS: Videoflurorscopy to measure a scale of 11 variables: lip closure score, bolus formation, residue in oral cavity, oral transit time, triggering of pharyngeal swallow, laryngeal elevation and epiglottic closure, nasal penetration, residue in valleculae, coating of pharyngeal wall after swallow, and pharyngeal transit time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Polychotomous linear logistic regression analysis of videofluoroscopic and aspiration results. Scale sensitivity and specificity, and the correlation between the total score of the scale and aspiration grade were analyzed. RESULTS: The scale's sensitivity and specificity for detecting supraglottic penetration and subglottic aspiration were 81%, 70.7%, and 78.1%, 77.9%, respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the scale's total score and the severity of aspiration (Spearman's r =.58943, p =.00001). CONCLUSION: This functional dysphagia scale, which was based on a videofluoroscopic swallowing study in stroke patients, is a sensitive and specific method for quantifying the severity of dysphagia.     

The effect of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal swallowing: a clinical and electrophysiologic study

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical usefulness of an electrophysiologic method for evaluating dysphagia and to identify the effects of various head and neck positions on oropharyngeal swallowing. DESIGN: Experimental, with control group. SETTING: An electromyography laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with neurogenic dysphagia (n = 51) and healthy controls (n = 24). Patients were divided into 2 groups: those patients with unilateral lower cranial lesions (n = 9) and those without laterality in the function of the oropharyngeal muscles (n = 42). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were instructed to swallow doses of water, gradually increasing in quantity from 1 to 25 mL under 5 conditions: neutral, chin up, chin tucked, head rotated right, and head rotated left. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in dysphagia limit through specified head and neck postures. Oropharyngeal swallowing was evaluated by laryngeal movements that were detected by a piezoelectric sensor and electromyography of the submental muscle complex. Laryngeal sensor signals occurring within 8 seconds of a swallow were accepted as a sign of the dysphagia limit. RESULTS: In the control group, dysphagia limit did not change significantly with changes in head and neck postures, except for the chin-up posture (p <.05) in which piecemeal deglutition occurred when subjects swallowed volumes less than 20 mL. Dysphagia limit improved significantly (p <.05) in 67% of the patients with unilateral lower cranial lesions when the head was rotated toward the paretic side. In dysphagic patients with bilateral symptoms, a significant (p <.01) improvement in dysphagia limit occurred in 50% of patients in chin-tuck position, but in the chin-up position, 55% of the patients experienced a significant (p <.01) decrease in dysphagia limit. CONCLUSION: The electrophysiologic method of measuring dysphagia limit confirms neurogenic dysphagia and its severity in the neutral head position. Changes in head and neck positions do not significantly alter dysphagia limit in unimpaired subjects except for the chin-up position. Although the results obtained were not compared with other techniques (eg, videofluoroscopy), this simple electrophysiologic method for describing dysphagia limit may have a place in the evaluation of dysphagia and its variability in various head and neck positions.     

Laryngeal dynamics

Laryngeal symptomatology is diverse and may be subtle. The barium swallow may be the first indication of abnormality and must be performed in a recorded mode since neurigenic dysphagia may be impossible to detect without the benefit of slow motion and replay. Inspiration, phonation, and the Valsalva maneuvers may give additional information in plain film, tomographic, laryngographic, or videofluoroscopic modes. They should be interpreted together and a specific functional abnormality determined if possible. The modified Valsalva and Mueller maneuvers, on the other hand, are means of evaluating anatomic variations, but provide little dynamic information. Neurologic and otolaryngologic consultation should be made for confirmation as required for patient care.     

Outcomes of tongue-pressure strength and accuracy training for dysphagia following acquired brain injury

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure treatment outcomes in a group of six adults with chronic dysphagia following acquired brain injury, who each completed 24 sessions of tongue-pressure resistance training, over a total of 11–12 weeks. The treatment protocol emphasized both strength and accuracy. Biofeedback was provided using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument. Amplitude accuracy targets were set between 20–90% of the patient's maximum isometric pressure capacity. Single subject methods were used to track changes in tongue strength (maximum isometric pressures), with functional swallowing outcomes measured using blinded ratings of a standard pre- and post-treatment videofluoroscopy protocol. Improvements were seen in post-treatment measures of tongue pressure and penetration–aspiration. No improvements were seen in pharyngeal residues, indeed worsening residue was seen in some patients.     

Ultrasound in dysphagia rehabilitation: a novel approach following partial glossectomy

Purpose: While the presence of dysphagia following partial glossectomy has been widely reported, there is insufficient quality evidence to guide clinical decision making about the treatment of this disorder. This study investigated a novel dysphagia rehabilitation approach using ultrasound tongue imaging for patient training.

Method: Initially, a pilot study was conducted to investigate the feasibility of ultrasound visual feedback during swallow tasks. The protocol was then replicated using a single-case experimental designed study to investigate therapeutic effect. Swallow, speech, and oromotor functions were measured across multiple baselines using an A-B-A intervention study design.

Results: During intervention, both participants were able to interpret ultrasound tongue images during swallow tasks. Following intervention, positive therapeutic effect was achieved with reduced frequency of aspiration and self-initiated swallow strategies. Generalization of intervention was evidenced by reduced bolus transit duration on videofluoroscopy and improved functional oral intake scores. Speech and oromotor functions remained stable throughout the study demonstrating experimental control.

Conclusions: This study establishes that ultrasound visual feedback is feasible in dysphagia rehabilitation following partial glossectomy. In addition, the predicted therapeutic effect specifically to swallow but not speech or oromotor functions were demonstrated.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Partial glossectomy results in altered tongue shape, movement, and function which negatively impact on speech and swallowing

• There is limited research evidence to support previously used speech pathology interventions (in particular, tongue range of movement exercises) to rehabilitate dysphagia following tongue cancer surgery

• The tongue, and hence oral phase of swallowing, can be viewed by placing an ultrasound probe under the chin

• Ultrasound scanning of the tongue is not invasive, can be repeated without dosage side effect. It’s also comfortable for the patient and if a portable probe and monitor are used, can be performed within a variety of clinical settings for assessment or therapy

• This study shows specific therapeutic benefit following ultrasound visual feedback along with a motor learning approach to rehabilitate swallow function following partial glossectomy

• Visual and verbal feedback that focus specifically on the motor movements undergoing adaptation (e.g., tongue wave movement, tongue elevation, bolus clearance) following partial glossectomy are recommended

• Patients who are able to see the ultrasound monitor, hear the feedback given, are cognitively able to self-evaluate tongue movement, and remember intervention goals will most benefit from ultrasound tongue visual feedback in therapy

• Clinicians also benefit from visualizing the tongue with ultrasound during assessment and therapy as a direct view reduces the subjectivity of rating task performance

     

Identification of dysphagia using the Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (TOR-BSST©): Are 10 teaspoons of water necessary?

Abstract

Dysphagia screening often includes administration of water. This study assessed the accuracy in identifying dysphagia with each additional teaspoon of water. The original research of the TOR-BSST^© permitted this assessment. Trained nurses from acute and rehabilitation facilities prospectively administered the TOR-BSST^© to 311 eligible stroke inpatients. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for the water item using 10 teaspoons plus a sip as the standard. The proportion of positive screenings was 59.2% in acute and 38.5% in rehabilitation. Of all four items that form the TOR-BSST^©, the water swallow item contributed to the identification of dysphagia in 42.7% in acute and 29.0% in rehabilitation patients. Across all patients, dysphagia accuracy was that five teaspoons resulted in a sensitivity of 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70–86), eight a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI = 85–96) and 10 a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI = 90–99). Although a primary contributor, the water swallow item alone does not identify all patients with dysphagia. For a water swallow to accurately identify dysphagia, it is critical to administer 10 teaspoons. The TOR-BSST^© water swallow item contributes largely to the total TOR-BSST^©'s screening score and in making the test highly accurate and reliable.     

Bedside screening tests vs. videofluoroscopy or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: systematic review

Title. Bedside screening tests vs. videofluoroscopy or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: systematic review. Aim. This paper is a report of a systematic review conducted to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of bedside screening methods for detecting dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders. Background. Dyspaghia affects 22–65% of patients with neurological conditions. Although there is a large variety of bedside tests to detect dysphagia, it is unknown which have the best psychometric properties and are feasible for nurses to use. Data sources and review methods. An electronic database search was carried out using Medline (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, and PsychLit, including all hits up to July 2008. The search terms were dysphagia, sensitivity, specificity, diagnosis, and screening. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed. Results. Thirty‐five out of 407 studies were included in the review. Eleven studies with sufficient methodological quality revealed that trial swallow tests using water had sensitivities between 27% and 85% and specificities between 63% and 88%. Trial swallow tests with different viscosities led to sensitivities ranging from 41% to 100% and specificities of 57% to 82%. Combining water tests with oxygen desaturation led to sensitivities between 73% and 98% and specificities between 63% and 76%. Single clinical features, such as abnormal gag, generally had low sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion. A water test combined with pulse oximetry using coughing, choking and voice alteration as endpoints is currently the best method to screen patients with neurological disorders for dysphagia. Further research is needed to establish the most effective standardized administration procedure for such a water test, and to assess the value of pulse oximetry, in addition to a trial swallow to detect silent aspiration.     

Dysphagia. Diagnostic pitfalls and how to avoid them

Oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia involve different phases of swallowing, have different causes, and can usually be distinguished by a thorough patient history. Initial evaluation of patients with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia includes patient history, physical and neurologic examination, and careful videofluoroscopic study of pharyngeal dynamics. Initial evaluation of patients with suspected esophageal dysphagia includes patient history and barium swallow with esophagography. Lesions such as Schatzki's ring or peptic stricture may not be detected unless the esophagus is sufficiently distended and the patient is given a bolus challenge.     

Functional and physiological outcomes from an exercise-based dysphagia therapy: a pilot investigation of the McNeill Dysphagia Therapy Program

Crary MA, Carnaby GD, LaGorio LA, Carvajal PJ. Functional and physiological outcomes from an exercise-based dysphagia therapy: a pilot investigation of the McNeill Dysphagia Therapy Program.ObjectiveTo investigate functional and physiological changes in swallowing performance of adults with chronic dysphagia after an exercise-based dysphagia therapy.DesignIntervention study: before-after trial with 3-month follow-up evaluation.SettingOutpatient clinic within a tertiary care academic health science center.ParticipantsAdults (N=9) with chronic (>12mo) dysphagia after unsuccessful prior therapies. Subjects were identified from among patients referred to an outpatient dysphagia clinic. Subjects had dysphagia secondary to prior treatment for head/neck cancer or from neurologic injury. All subjects demonstrated clinical and fluoroscopic evidence of oropharyngeal dysphagia. No subject withdrew during the course of this study.InterventionsAll subjects completed 3 weeks of an intensive, exercise-based dysphagia therapy. Therapy was conducted daily for 1h/d, with additional activities completed by subjects each night between therapy sessions.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcomes were clinical and functional change in swallowing performance with maintenance at 3 months after intervention. Secondary, exploratory outcomes included physiological change in swallow performance measured by hyolaryngeal elevation, lingual-palatal and pharyngeal manometric pressure, and surface electromyographic amplitude.ResultsClinical and functional swallowing performances improved significantly and were maintained at the 3-month follow-up examination. Subject perspective (visual analog scale) on functional swallowing also improved. Four of 7 subjects who were initially feeding tube dependent progressed to total oral intake after 3 weeks of intervention. Physiological indices demonstrated increased swallowing effort after intervention.ConclusionsSignificant clinical and functional improvement in swallowing performance followed a time-limited (3wk) exercise-based intervention in a sample of subjects with chronic dysphagia. Physiological changes after therapy implicate improved neuromuscular functioning within the swallow mechanism.     

Protocol for the use of videofluoroscopy in pediatric swallowing dysfunction

A clinical and research protocol was developed to compare the sensitivity and clinical value of videofluoroscopy with the traditional bedside clinical evaluation in the evaluation of children's swallowing dysfunction. The bedside and videofluoroscopic evaluations of 33 children were reviewed retrospectively. Our findings indicated that recommendations for feeding changed for 14 of the children as a result of the information gained from videofluoroscopic evaluation. The results suggest that videofluoroscopy provides therapists with more objective evidence than a bedside evaluation for determining the etiology of swallowing dysfunction and directing the management or treatment of this dysfunction.     

Predictors of dysphagia after spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the incidence of swallowing deficits (dysphagia) and to identify factors that predict risk for dysphagia in the rehabilitation setting following acute traumatic spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: Data were collected on 187 patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury admitted for rehabilitation over a 4-year period who underwent a swallowing screen, in which 42 underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: VFSS was performed on patients with suspected swallowing problems. Possible antecedents of dysphagia were recorded from the medical record including previous history of spine surgery, surgical approach and technique, tracheostomy and ventilator status, neurologic level of injury, ASIA Impairment Classification, orthosis, etiology of injury, age, and gender. RESULTS: On admission to rehabilitation 22.5% (n = 42) of spinal cord injury patients had symptoms suggesting dysphagia. In 73.8% (n = 31) of these cases, testing confirmed dysphagia (aspiration or requiring a modified diet), while VFSS ruled out dysphagia in 26.2% (n = 11) cases. Logistic regression and other analyses revealed three significant predictors of risk for dysphagia: age (p < .028), tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation (p < .001), and spinal surgery via an anterior cervical approach (p < .016). Other variables analyzed had no relation or at best a slight relation to dysphagia. Tracheostomy at admission was the strongest predictor of dysphagia. The combination of tracheostomy at rehabilitation admission and anterior surgical approach had an extremely high rate of dysphagia (48%). CONCLUSION: Swallowing abnormalities are present in a significant percentage of patients presenting to rehabilitation with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Patients with a tracheostomy appear to have a substantially increased risk of development of dysphagia, although other factors are also relevant. Risk of dysphagia should be evaluated to decrease the potential for morbidity related to swallowing abnormalities.     

Clinical screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with ALS

ObjectiveIt is a major issue to diagnose and detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in the early stage of ALS in order to avoid pulmonary and nutritional complications. The aim of this study was to validate a simple clinical test, the Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST), to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in this population.Patients and methodsTwenty patients were included in this study (mean age: 66.1 ± 8.13, six women). All patients had their swallowing function assessed by videofluoroscopy and V-VST.ResultsAmong these 20 patients, 15 presented oropharyngeal dysphagia, diagnosed by videofluoroscopy, and five had normal swallowing. Norris score was lower in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia compared to the patients with normal swallowing (27 ± 6 versus 36 ± 2; P = 0.003). Among the 15 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, 14 had abnormal V-VST, and only one had normal V-VST. The sensibility of V-VST to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in these patients with ALS was of 93%, and the specificity was of 80% (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference between the two populations for ALSFRS score (22 ± 6 versus 20 ± 6) and body mass index (BMI) (26 ± 6 versus 26 ± 6 kg/m²).ConclusionThe V-VST presented good sensibility and specificity. It may be interesting to use it systematically for the detection of oropharyngeal dysphagia in ALS, after confirming these results on a wider patient sample.     

Efficacy and safety of a modified method for blind bedside placement of post-pyloric feeding tube: a prospective preliminary clinical trial

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of a new modified method of bedside post-pyloric feeding tube catheterization with the Corpak protocol versus electromagnetic-guided catheterization.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a single-center, single-blinded, prospective clinical trial. Sixty-three patients were treated with a non-gravity type gastrointestinal feeding tube using different procedures: modified bedside post-pyloric feeding tube placement (M group), the conventional Corpak protocol (C group), and standard electromagnetic-guided tube placement (EM group).ResultsThe success rate in the M group, C group, and EM group was 82.9% (34/41), 70.7% (29/41), and 88.2% (15/17), respectively, with significant differences among the groups. The time required to pass the pylorus was significantly shorter in the M group (26.9 minutes) than in the C group (31.9 minutes) and EM group (42.1 minutes). The proportion of pylorus-passing operations completed within 30 minutes was significantly higher in the M group than in the C group and EM group. No severe complications occurred.ConclusionThis modified method of bedside post-pyloric feeding tube catheterization significantly shortened the time required to pass the pylorus with no severe adverse reactions. This method is effective and safe for enteral nutrition catheterization of patients with dysphagia and a high risk of aspiration pneumonia.     

Assessment of aspiration in patients with tracheostomies: comparison of the bedside colored dye assessment with videofluoroscopic examination

BACKGROUND: Aspiration is a serious clinical concern in patients with long-term artificial airways. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of a bedside colored dye assessment of aspiration in tracheostomized patients and to determine its comparability to a more sophisticated videofluoroscopic study. METHODS: This was a prospective, blinded comparison study conducted in a large, urban, university teaching hospital. We studied 20 consecutive patients who underwent tracheostomy for bronchial hygiene needs and who were referred for videofluorographic evaluation for suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia and possible aspiration. Excluded were patients unable to follow verbal commands and those requiring mechanical ventilatory support. All patients were brought to the videofluorography suite for colored dye assessment for aspiration and videofluorographic assessment of oropharyngeal swallow. A nurse, blinded to the results of videofluorographic swallow study, performed colored dye assessments for aspiration. Speech-language pathologists, blinded to the results of the colored dye assessments, interpreted simultaneous (preliminary) and subsequent complete (final) videofluorographic evaluations of swallow. RESULTS: The colored dye aspiration assessments and the videofluoroscopic studies were compared for the frequency of aspiration detection. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using standard methods. Seven patients showed no aspiration on either the colored dye test or videofluoroscopic examination. Eight patients were judged to aspirate by videofluorography but not by the colored dye test. Five patients were judged to aspirate by both the colored dye test and videofluorography. The data indicate that the colored dye test for aspiration carries a low sensitivity of 38% (95% confidence interval = +/- 7%), but a high specificity of 100%. The videofluoroscopic study detected a significantly greater frequency of aspiration than did the colored dye test (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The colored dye test for aspiration can provide useful information when positive, but because there is a significant false negative rate, decisions made on the basis of a negative test must be made with caution.