Production of Paradoxical Sensory Hypersensitivity by α2-Adrenoreceptor Agonists

Background: Administration of opioid receptor agonists is followed by paradoxical sensory hypersensitivity. This hypersensitivity has been suggested to contribute to the antinociceptive tolerance observed with opioids. The authors hypothesized that [alpha]2-adrenoreceptor agonists, which also produce antinociceptive tolerance, would produce sensory hypersensitivity.

Methods: [alpha]2-Adrenoreceptor agonists were administered to male Sprague-Dawley rats as a single subcutaneous injection, a continuous subcutaneous infusion, a single intrathecal injection, or a continuous intrathecal infusion. Thermal sensitivity was determined using latency to withdrawal of the hind paw from radiant heat. Tactile sensitivity was determined using withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments. Spinal dynorphin content was measured by enzyme immunoassay.

Results: Single systemic or intrathecal injections of clonidine or dexmedetomidine produced antinociception followed by delayed thermal and tactile hypersensitivity. Six-day systemic or intrathecal infusion of clonidine produced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity observed even during clonidine infusion. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented by coadministration of the [alpha]2-adrenoreceptor-selective antagonist idazoxan or the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-selective antagonist MK-801. Six-day infusion of intrathecal clonidine increased dynorphin content in dorsal lumbar spinal cord. MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum reversed clonidine-induced sensory hypersensitivity.     

Analysis of Drug Interaction between Intrathecal Clonidine and MK-801 in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Rat Model

Background: Spinally delivered alpha2 -adrenoceptor agonists and N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists each have been shown to have actions attenuating the hyperesthesia in rat models of nerve injury pain. Using a fixed-dose analysis and an isobolographic paradigm, the spinal interaction between the alpha2 -adrenoceptor agonist clonidine and the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist MK-801 is characterized in a rat model of nerve injury-induced tactile hyperesthesia.

Methods: Male Sprague Dawley rats were anesthetized with halothane, and the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves were ligated (Chung model). After 7-10 days' recovery, a Polyethylene tubing catheter was implanted into the lumbar intrathecal space. After recovery from catheter implantations (5-7 days), intrathecal dose-response curves were established for the antihyperesthesia effects of clonidine (3, 6, 10, and 20 micro gram) and MK-801 (1, 3, 10, and 20 micro gram) alone to obtain the ED50 for each agent. In separate studies, three doses of clonidine (l, 3, and 10 micro gram) were injected mixed with one dose of MK-801 (1 micro gram) for fixed-dose analysis, and three doses of the two agents (2, 6, and 20 micro gram) were injected jointly in a fraction of the dose ratio 1:1 for isobolographic analysis. Thresholds for left hind paw withdrawal to von Frey hair application were assessed.

Results: Rats with nerve ligation showed a reliable tactile hyperesthesia (mechanical threshold 1-3 g vs. normal > 15 g). Intrathecal clonidine and MK-801 alone produced dose-dependent reductions of tactile hyperesthesia: ED50 9 micro gram and 10 micro gram, respectively. With the fixed-dose analysis, the log dose-response curves showed a left shift that considerably exceeds the theoretical curve made by a simple sum of the effects of clonidine alone and with MK-801 (1 micro gram). With the isobolographic analysis, the combination ED50 was found to be statistically less than the theoretical additive dose combination. lntrathecal atipamezole, an alpha2 antagonist, reversed the effects of clonidine and the clonidine/MK-801 mixture but not MK-801 alone. The side effect of clonidine was sedation and urination and that of MK-801 was motor weakness at doses above 10 micro gram. These effects were considerably less severe in rats after equiactive doses in the combination group.     

Clonidine, but Not Morphine, Delays the Development of Thermal Hyperesthesia Induced by Sciatic Nerve Constriction Injury in the Rat

Background: It has been shown that the spinal facilitation induced by the injury discharge evoked by a nerve constriction injury is crucial in the development of thermal hyperesthesia. Both opioids and alpha2 agonists have been reported to prevent the development of spinal facilitation evoked by the small afferent input to the spinal cord. Moreover, it has been reported that the thermal hyperesthesia induced by a nerve constriction injury is sympathetically maintained and that spinally administered alpha2 agonists can modulate the sympathetic outflow from the spinal cord. The current study investigated the effect of spinally administered morphine and clonidine, an alpha2 agonist, on the development of thermal hyperesthesia induced by nerve constriction injury in the rat.

Methods: A model of thermal hyperesthesia induced by a constriction injury created by making four loose ligatures around the rat sciatic nerve was used to examine the development of thermal hyperesthesia. Morphine, clonidine, and idazoxan were administered intrathecally or intraperitoneally 20 min before (pretreatment study) or 20 min after (posttreatment study) the nerve injury.

Results: Pretreatment, but not posttreatment, with intrathecal clonidine significantly delayed the development of thermal hyperesthesia in a dose-dependent manner, and this delay in onset produced by clonidine was 3 days after the nerve injury. This effect of clonidine's was completely antagonized by the coadministration of idazoxan with clonidine. Intrathecal morphine had no effect on the development of thermal hyperesthesia in this study.     

Spinal adenosine receptor activation reduces hypersensitivity after surgery by a different mechanism than after nerve injury

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal adenosine has antinociceptive effects under conditions of hypersensitivity. T62 (2-amino-3-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzothiophen) is an allosteric adenosine receptor modulator that enhances adenosine binding to the A1 receptor. Intrathecal T62 reduces hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli in a rat model of neuropathic pain by a circuit that totally relies on activation of alpha2 adrenoceptors. Here, the authors tested whether this same dependence was present in the acute setting of hypersensitivity after surgery. METHODS: Intrathecal catheters were inserted in male Sprague-Dawley rats. An incision of the plantar aspect of the hind paw resulted 24 h later in hypersensitivity, as measured by applying von Frey filaments to the paw. At this time, rats received intrathecal T62, clonidine, or the combination in a blinded, isobolographic design. The effect of the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan on T62 was also tested. RESULTS: Intrathecal T62 produced a dose-dependent antihypersensitivity effect, with no effect on ambulation or activity level. Clonidine also produced a dose-dependent antihypersensitivity effect. The ED40 (95% confidence interval) for T62 was 0.77 (0.63-0.91) microg, and that for clonidine was 1.23 (0.56-1.9) microg. Isobolographic analysis indicated synergism between T62 and clonidine. Intrathecal pretreatment with idazoxan only partially inhibited the antihypersensitivity effect of T62. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal T62 is effective for postoperative hypersensitivity. The synergy of T62 with clonidine and its only partial antagonism by idazoxan suggest that T62 does not rely entirely on activation of alpha2 adrenoceptors. These results indicate that, after surgery, T62 acts via a mechanism different from that of spinal nerve ligation, a model of chronic neuropathic pain.     

Dextromethorphan potentiates morphine antinociception at the spinal level in rats

PURPOSE: Morphine is an effective analgesic, but adverse effects limit its clinical use in higher doses. The non-opioid antitussive, dextromethorphan (DM), can potentiate the analgesic effect of morphine and decrease the dose of morphine in acute postoperative pain, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We previously observed that DM increases the serum concentration of morphine in rats. Therefore, we investigated the effects of drugs administered at the spinal level to exclude possible pharmacokinetic interactions. As DM has widespread binding sites in the central nervous system [such as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, sigma receptors and alpha(3)ss(4) nicotinic receptors], we investigated whether the potentiation of morphine antinociception by DM at the spinal level is related to NMDA receptors. METHODS: We used MK-801 as a tool to block the NMDA channel first, and then studied the interaction between intrathecal (i.t.) morphine and DM. The tail-flick test was used to examine the antinociceptive effects of different combinations of morphine and other drugs in rats. RESULTS: DM (2-20 microg) or MK-801 (5-15 microg) showed no significant antinociceptive effect by themselves. The antinociceptive effect of morphine (0.5 microg, i.t.) was significantly enhanced by DM and reached the maximal potentiation (43.7%-50.4%) at doses of 2 to 10 microg. Pretreatment with MK-801 (5 or 10 microg, i.t.) significantly potentiated morphine antinociception by 49.9% or 38.7%, respectively. When rats were pretreated with MK-801, DM could not further enhance morphine antinociception (45.7% vs 50.5% and 43.3%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that spinal NMDA receptors play an important role in the effect of DM to potentiate morphine antinociception.     

Intrathecal adenosine: interactions with spinal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Spinal adenosine receptor agonists exert antinociception in animal models of acute and chronic pain, but adenosine itself has not been examined. The authors tested the antinociceptive and antihypersensitivity interactions of intrathecal adenosine and its interactions with intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute thermal nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity. METHODS: Rats were prepared with lumbar intrathecal catheters. Responses to acute noxious stimulation were evaluated by latency to paw withdrawal from a radiant heat source focused on the hind paw. Postoperative hypersensitivity was measured after an incision in the rat hind paw by application of von Frey filaments to the heel adjacent to the wound. An isobolographic design was used to distinguish between additive and synergistic drug interactions. RESULTS: Spinal administration of clonidine and neostigmine, but not adenosine, produced dose-dependent antinociception to noxious thermal stimulation. Addition of adenosine enhanced the antinociceptive effect of clonidine but not neostigmine. In contrast, each of these three agents alone reversed postoperative hypersensitivity. Pretreatment with the alpha-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine completely reversed adenosine's antihypersensitivity action. Adenosine interacted synergistically with neostigmine and additively with clonidine in reducing postoperative hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that intrathecal adenosine by itself has no antinociceptive properties to acute noxious thermal stimulation in rats, but enhances clonidine's antinociception. In contrast, intrathecal adenosine is active against postoperative hypersensitivity by an adrenergic mechanism. Different interactions between adenosine, clonidine, and neostigmine in acute nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity models are consistent with altered central processing of sensory information after peripheral injury.     

Intrathecal Adenosine: Interactions with Spinal Clonidine and Neostigmine in Rat Models of Acute Nociception and Postoperative Hypersensitivity

Background: Spinal adenosine receptor agonists exert antinociception in animal models of acute and chronic pain, but adenosine itself has not been examined. The authors tested the antinociceptive and antihypersensitivity interactions of intrathecal adenosine and its interactions with intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute thermal nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity.

Methods: Rats were prepared with lumbar intrathecal catheters. Responses to acute noxious stimulation were evaluated by latency to paw withdrawal from a radiant heat source focused on the hind paw. Postoperative hypersensitivity was measured after an incision in the rat hind paw by application of von Frey filaments to the heel adjacent to the wound. An isobolographic design was used to distinguish between additive and synergistic drug interactions.

Results: Spinal administration of clonidine and neostigmine, but not adenosine, produced dose-dependent antinociception to noxious thermal stimulation. Addition of adenosine enhanced the antinociceptive effect of clonidine but not neostigmine. In contrast, each of these three agents alone reversed postoperative hypersensitivity. Pretreatment with the [Greek small letter alpha]-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine completely reversed adenosine's antihypersensitivity action. Adenosine interacted synergistically with neostigmine and additively with clonidine in reducing postoperative hypersensitivity.     

Antinociceptive interactions between alpha 2-adrenergic and opiate agonists at the spinal level in rodents

This study was undertaken to evaluate the antinociceptive interactions of alpha 2 adrenergic and opiate receptors at the spinal level. Morphine and clonidine were administered intrathecally (i.t.) by lumbar puncture to rats either alone or in the presence of either i.t. yohimbine, an alpha 2 antagonist, or systemic naloxone, an opioid antagonist. The effect of tolerance to systematically administered morphine on responses to i.t. morphine and clonidine was examined in mice. Antinociception was determined by observing the response to a clamp applied to the tail (Haffner test) in mice and by the tail-flick test in rats; log dose-response curves for antinociception were generated for morphine, clonidine, and each drug combination. Morphine and clonidine both produced dose-dependent antinociception when given i.t. in both species. The i.t. administration of yohimbine attenuated the antinociceptive effect of both clonidine and morphine, but naloxone attenuated only the response to morphine. Further, a sub-analgetic dose of i.t. clonidine potentiated the effect of i.t. morphine. In morphine-tolerant mice, i.t. morphine was not efficacious whereas clonidine retained full efficacy, although potency was slightly diminished. Thus, it appears that alpha 2 adrenoceptor-mediated antinociception is independent of opiate receptor mechanisms. Clinical use of intrathecal combinations of alpha 2 adrenergic and opiate receptor agonists to increase analgesia and use of intrathecal alpha 2 agonists for pain relief in patients tolerant to opiates might deserve evaluation.     

Spinal Adenosine Receptor Activation Reduces Hypersensitivity after Surgery by a Different Mechanism Than after Nerve Injury

Background: Intrathecal adenosine has antinociceptive effects under conditions of hypersensitivity. T62 (2-amino-3-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzothiophen) is an allosteric adenosine receptor modulator that enhances adenosine binding to the A1 receptor. Intrathecal T62 reduces hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli in a rat model of neuropathic pain by a circuit that totally relies on activation of [alpha]2 adrenoceptors. Here, the authors tested whether this same dependence was present in the acute setting of hypersensitivity after surgery.

Methods: Intrathecal catheters were inserted in male Sprague-Dawley rats. An incision of the plantar aspect of the hind paw resulted 24 h later in hypersensitivity, as measured by applying von Frey filaments to the paw. At this time, rats received intrathecal T62, clonidine, or the combination in a blinded, isobolographic design. The effect of the [alpha]2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan on T62 was also tested.

Results: Intrathecal T62 produced a dose-dependent antihypersensitivity effect, with no effect on ambulation or activity level. Clonidine also produced a dose-dependent antihypersensitivity effect. The ED40 (95% confidence interval) for T62 was 0.77 (0.63-0.91) [mu]g, and that for clonidine was 1.23 (0.56-1.9) [mu]g. Isobolographic analysis indicated synergism between T62 and clonidine. Intrathecal pretreatment with idazoxan only partially inhibited the antihypersensitivity effect of T62.     

Site of hemodynamic effects of intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists.

Intrathecally administered alpha 2-adrenergic agonists produce analgesia in humans but may also produce hypotension and bradycardia. To further characterize hemodynamic depression produced by intrathecally administered alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, clonidine (100-1,500 micrograms) was injected into the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar intrathecal space of conscious sheep. Only thoracic intrathecal clonidine injection (100 or 300 micrograms) decreased blood pressure, whereas these doses did not affect blood pressure when injected at other sites. A greater clonidine dose (1,500 micrograms) increased blood pressure to a similar degree at all sites. Hypotension after thoracic intrathecal clonidine injection was inhibited by pretreatment with the alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist idazoxan (1 mg, intrathecally) or the depleter of acetylcholine stores hemicholinium-3 (2 mg, intrathecally), suggesting an action at alpha 2-adrenoceptors on cholinergic preganglionic sympathetic neurons. ST-91, a polar clonidine analog, did not decrease blood pressure after thoracic intrathecal injection. Intrathecal injection of the muscarinic receptor agonist carbamylcholine increased blood pressure. These data describe a complex action of intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists on hemodynamic parameters that is dependent on site of injection, drug dose, and drug lipophilicity; that can be explained by anatomic factors; and that may possibly be exploited to minimize hemodynamic depression from these agents.     

Antinociceptive actions of intrathecal xylazine: interactions with spinal cord opioid pathways

We have studied rats with chronically implanted subarachnoid catheters. Xylazine, an alpha 2 adrenoceptor agonist, was injected intrathecally and nociceptive thresholds measured at two skin sites: the tail and the neck. Intrathecal xylazine (dose range 24.3-389 nmol) produced increases in electrical thresholds for nociception in the tail without any change in the neck; this observation suggested that the antinociceptive action of this drug was confined to the caudal part of the spinal cord responsible for tail innervation. The magnitude of this effect was dose-dependent. Tail flick latency also increased in these rats and the antinociceptive effects were antagonized in a dose- dependent manner by the selective alpha 2 adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (dose range 6.7-540 nmol). Intrathecal idazoxan also suppressed the increase in tail flick latency caused by the mu opioid agonist fentanyl (0.74 nmol) given intrathecally. This effect was also dose-dependent. The idazoxan dose-response curve for this suppression of fentanyl antinociception assessed with tail flick latency was the same as that for suppression of xylazine. In contrast, the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal xylazine were not affected by concurrent administration of opioid or GABAA antagonists. We conclude that intrathecal xylazine produced spinally mediated antinociceptive effects by combination with spinal cord alpha 2 adrenoceptors and that neither opioid nor GABA-containing propriospinal neurones were involved in the mediation of this effect. However, alpha 2 adrenoceptors in the spinal cord appear to be involved with antinociception produced by intrathecal fentanyl.      

Peripheral nerve injury alters the alpha2 adrenoceptor subtype activated by clonidine for analgesia

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that the alpha adrenoceptor subtype is the target for spinally administered alpha -adrenergic agonists, clonidine, for pain relief. However, ST 91, a preferential alpha adrenoceptor subtype agonist, induces antinociception, and intrathecally administered alpha antisense oligodeoxynucleotide decreases antinociception induced by clonidine in the rat, suggesting non-A sites may be important as well. Therefore, the authors examined the subtype of alpha adrenoceptor activated by clonidine and ST 91 in normal rats and those with nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity. METHODS: The same mechanical stimulus was applied to normal rats and those following spinal nerve ligation, and the effect of intrathecal clonidine and ST 91 on withdrawal threshold to the stimulus was determined. To further examine subtypes, animals were spinally pretreated with vehicle, BRL 44408 (an alpha subtype-preferring antagonist), and ARC 239 (an alpha subtype-preferring antagonist). RESULTS: In normal animals, clonidine's effect was diminished by pretreatment with either antagonist, whereas ST 91's antinociceptive effect was solely blocked by pretreatment with ARC 239. In nerve-injured animals, the antihypersensitivity action of both clonidine and ST 91 was blocked by administration of ARC 239, whereas BRL 44408 was ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: These data agree with previous studies supporting that the alpha adrenoceptor is important to the antinociceptive effect of clonidine in normal animals. Nerve injury alters this and results in a total reliance on alpha adrenoceptors.     

Epidural clonidine produces antinociception, but not hypotension, in sheep

Intrathecally administered clonidine produces analgesia, but also produces hypotension. To assess the effects of epidural administration, the authors inserted lumbar epidural catheters in seven nonpregnant ewes, and injected, on separate days, clonidine (50-750 mcg), morphine (5-10 mg), and a clonidine-morphine combination (clonidine 150 mcg + morphine 5 mg). Clonidine produced dose-dependent antinociception and sedation, with the lowest maximally effective antinociceptive dose being 300 mcg. Morphine produced less intense antinociception than clonidine, and did not potentiate clonidine's effect. Antinociception, but not sedation, following clonidine injection was reversed by epidural injection of the alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist, idazoxan. Epidurally administered naloxone and prazosin did not reverse clonidine's antinociceptive effect, nor did intravenously administered idazoxan. Epidurally administered clonidine did not decrease blood pressure or heart rate or affect arterial blood gas tensions or spinal cord histology. These data suggest that epidurally administered clonidine produces analgesia by a local, alpha 2-adrenergic mechanism. In sheep, epidurally administered clonidine does not produce hypotension.     

Peripheral Nerve Injury Alters the α2 Adrenoceptor Subtype Activated by Clonidine for Analgesia

Background: Previous studies suggest that the [alpha]2A adrenoceptor subtype is the target for spinally administered [alpha]2-adrenergic agonists, i.e., clonidine, for pain relief. However, ST 91, a preferential [alpha]2 NON-A adrenoceptor subtype agonist, induces antinociception, and intrathecally administered [alpha]2C antisense oligodeoxynucleotide decreases antinociception induced by clonidine in the rat, suggesting non-A sites may be important as well. Therefore, the authors examined the subtype of [alpha]2 adrenoceptor activated by clonidine and ST 91 in normal rats and those with nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity.

Methods: The same mechanical stimulus was applied to normal rats and those following spinal nerve ligation, and the effect of intrathecal clonidine and ST 91 on withdrawal threshold to the stimulus was determined. To further examine subtypes, animals were spinally pretreated with vehicle, BRL 44408 (an [alpha]2A subtype-preferring antagonist), and ARC 239 (an [alpha]2 NON-A subtype-preferring antagonist).

Results: In normal animals, clonidine's effect was diminished by pretreatment with either antagonist, whereas ST 91's antinociceptive effect was solely blocked by pretreatment with ARC 239. In nerve-injured animals, the antihypersensitivity action of both clonidine and ST 91 was blocked by administration of ARC 239, whereas BRL 44408 was ineffective.     

Continuous intrathecal clonidine and tizanidine in conscious dogs: analgesic and hemodynamic effects

Alpha-2-adrenergic agonists, such as clonidine, produce antinociception in animal pain models after intrathecal administration. However, clinical usage is limited by cardiovascular side effects. To investigate alternative alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists as analgesics, we implanted six dogs with an intrathecal catheter and infusion pump. After baseline saline infusion, animals received clonidine or tizanidine (crossover study) each week at escalating doses of 125-750 microg/h. Analgesia, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, sedation, and coordination were evaluated. A 28-day safety study was performed with another nine dogs receiving intrathecal tizanidine (3 or 6 mg/d) or saline. Equal doses of clonidine and tizanidine produce the same antinociception in thermal withdrawal tests. Blood pressure was reduced with 125-500 microg/h of clonidine, but not with tizanidine at any dose. Clonidine 250 microg/h reduced heart rate by 45.8%, and five of six animals had bradyarrhythmias (marked bradycardia), whereas tizanidine decreased heart rate by 15.1% without arrhythmias, even at the largest dose. Respiratory rate decreased with 250 microg/h of clonidine and larger doses. Sedation or incoordination occurred only at the largest dose for either drug. The safety study indicated that 3 mg/d of tizanidine in dogs produced no side effects or histopathologic changes. Tizanidine may be a useful alternative in patients experiencing cardiovascular side effects with intrathecal infusion of clonidine. IMPLICATIONS: Clonidine is an effective spinal analgesic, but it is dose-limited by cardiovascular side effects. We compared the analgesic properties and side effects of clonidine with those of a similar drug, tizanidine. Continuous spinal infusion of tizanidine produced similar analgesia as clonidine, but with fewer adverse effects on blood pressure and heart rate.     

Spinal Microglial and Perivascular Cell Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Activation Reduces Behavioral Hypersensitivity without Tolerance after Peripheral Nerve Injury

Background: Cannabinoids induce analgesia by acting on cannabinoid receptor (CBR) types 1 and/or 2. However, central nervous system side effects and antinociceptive tolerance from CBR1 limit their clinical use. CBR2 exist on spinal glia and perivascular cells, suggesting an immunoregulatory role of these receptors in the central nervous system. Previously, the authors showed that spinal CBR2 activation reduces paw incision hypersensitivity and glial activation. This study tested whether CBR2 are expressed in glia and whether their activation would induce antinociception, glial inhibition, central side effects, and antinociceptive tolerance in a neuropathic rodent pain model.

Methods: Rats underwent L5 spinal nerve transection or sham surgery, and CBR2 expression and cell localization were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Animals received intrathecal injections of CBR agonists and antagonists, and mechanical withdrawal thresholds and behavioral side effects were assessed.

Results: Peripheral nerve transection induced hypersensitivity, increased expression of CR3/CD11b and CBR2, and reduced ED2/CD163 expression in the spinal cord. The CBR2 were localized to microglia and perivascular cells. Intrathecal JWH015 reduced peripheral nerve injury hypersensitivity and CR3/CD11b expression and increased ED2/CD163 expression in a dose-dependent fashion. These effects were prevented by intrathecal administration of the CBR2 antagonist (AM630) but not the CBR1 antagonist (AM281). JWH015 did not cause behavioral side effects. Chronic intrathecal JWH015 treatment did not induce antinociceptive tolerance.     

Sedative but not analgesic alpha2 agonist tolerance is blocked by NMDA receptor and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors

BACKGROUND: Studies show that the sedative and analgesic effects of alpha2 adrenergic agonists decrease over time, which is a form of synaptic plasticity referred to as tolerance. Because both the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex and nitric oxide synthase are pivotal for some forms of synaptic plasticity, their role in tolerance to the hypnotic and analgesic effects of alpha2 agonists was investigated. METHODS: After institutional approval, rats were made tolerant to the hypnotic or analgesic action of an alpha2 agonist, dexmedetomidine. The hypnotic response to dexmedetomidine was assessed by the duration of loss of righting reflex, and the analgesic response to dexmedetomidine was assessed by the tail-flick assay. In separate cohorts, either the NMDA receptors or nitric oxide synthase was antagonized by coadministration of MK-801, ketamine, or NO2-arginine, respectively, during induction of tolerance. In a separate series of experiments, after tolerance was induced, the hypnotic and analgesic responses to dexmedetomidine were assessed in the presence of acutely administered MK-801 or NO2-arginine. RESULTS: Induction of tolerance to the hypnotic effect of dexmedetomidine is blocked by coadministration of MK-801, ketamine, and NO2-arginine. However, after tolerance developed, acute administration of MK-801, ketamine, or NO2-arginine did not prevent the expression of tolerance. Coadministration of MK-801 or NO2-arginine neither prevents the development nor reverses the expression of tolerance to the analgesic action of dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSION: The underlying processes responsible for the development of tolerance to the hypnotic and analgesic actions of systemically administered alpha2 agonists were different, with only the sedative tolerance involving the NMDA receptor and nitric oxide synthase system.     

Perineural alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor activation inhibits spinal cord neuroplasticity and tactile allodynia after nerve injury

BACKGROUND: Nerve injury in animals increases alpha(2)-adrenoceptor expression in dorsal root ganglion cells and results in novel excitatory responses to their activation, perhaps leading to the phenomenon of sympathetically maintained pain. In contrast to this notion, peripheral alpha(2)-adrenoceptor stimulation fails to induce pain in patients with chronic pain. We hypothesized that alpha(2) adrenoceptors at the site of nerve injury play an inhibitory, not excitatory role. METHODS: Partial sciatic nerve ligation was performed on rats, resulting in a reduction in withdrawal threshold to tactile stimulation. Animals received perineural injection at the injury site of clonidine, saline, or clonidine plus an alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist, and withdrawal threshold was monitored. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the sciatic nerve ipsi- and contralateral to injury and on the spinal cord. RESULTS: Clonidine reduced this hypersensitivity in a dose-dependent manner, and this was blocked by an alpha(2A)-preferring antagonist. Perineural clonidine injection had a slow onset (days) and prolonged duration (weeks). Systemic or intrathecal clonidine, or transient neural blockade with ropivacaine, had short lasting or no effect on hypersensitivity. alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor immunostaining was increased near the site of peripheral nerve injury, both in neurons and in immune cells (macrophages and T lymphocytes). Phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (pCREB) in lumbar spinal cord was increased ipsilateral to nerve injury, and this was reduced 1 week after perineural clonidine injection. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that peripheral alpha(2) adrenoceptors are concentrated at the site of peripheral nerve injury, and their activation receptors produce long-lasting reductions in abnormal spinal cord gene activation and mechanical hypersensitivity.     

Ropivacaine and bupivacaine: concentrating on dosing!

The use of intrathecal clonidine as an adjunct for the management of chronic pain, intra- and postoperative analgesia is gaining an increase in popularity. However, antinociceptive doses of intrathecal clonidine may produce pronounced hemodynamic side effects, including hypotension and bradycardia. In this report, we present a case of severe hypotension after cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with intrathecal clonidine infusion. We postulate that the intrathecally administered alpha 2-agonist clonidine reduced our patient's ability to tolerate the hemodynamic lability that is present during the separation from cardiopulmonary bypass by potentially inhibiting sympathetic nervous system activity, renin-angiotensin system, or vasopressin release. The authors report a case of severe hypotension after cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient receiving intrathecal clonidine infusion for chronic neuropathic pain.     

Intrathecal clonidine potentiates suppression of tactile hypersensitivity by spinal cord stimulation in a model of neuropathy

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may provide pain relief in approximately 60%-70% of well selected patients with pain caused by peripheral nerve injury. We have previously demonstrated that intrathecal (IT) administration of small doses of certain drugs, both in experimental animals and in patients, significantly enhances the pain-relieving effect of SCS. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine, is extensively used as an adjunct to spinal morphine and is suggested to be particularly effective for neuropathic pain, but its clinical use is limited by side effects such as sedation and hypotension. In this study, we investigated the dose-response characteristics of IT clonidine, and whether a subeffective dose of clonidine could enhance the effect of SCS in nerve-injured rats with tactile hypersensitivity (allodynia). Results showed that clonidine, in doses of 1-20 microg, reduced the hypersensitivity in a dose-dependent manner. In rats in which SCS per se failed to suppress tactile hypersensitivity, the combination of SCS and a subeffective dose of clonidine appeared to be highly synergistic and markedly attenuated the hypersensitivity. These results suggest that small doses of IT clonidine may be combined with SCS in neuropathic pain patients who do not obtain satisfactory relief with SCS alone.