VDD Pacing with a Previously Implanted Single Lead System

Three patients who had undergone implantation of a rate modulated, afrial sensitive RS4 pacemaker, with a single orthogonal lead underwent replacement of a depleted unit with a DDD pulse generator, reusing the original lead with an adapter that allowed conversion of the bipolar atrial electrode into unipolar configuration. The mean atrial electrogram amplitude was 1,8 mV and no significant atrial sensing defects were found during Holler monitoring. As the RS4 pulse generator is no longer available, continued VDD pacing is possible by replacing it with a DDD pulse generator using the previously implanted single lead system.     

VDD Pacing in Children with Congenital Complete Heart Block: Advantages of a Single Pass Lead

A single pass lead for VDD pacing in complete heart hlock is well descrihed in adults hut there are only brief reports of its use in children. We used standard adult size single pass leads in ten children and adolescents aged 3.7–17.2 years (mean 9.9 years) and weighing 13.5–76 kg (mean 35.4 kg) with congenital complete heart block. One patient had coexisting congenital heart disease and had undergone surgery. A 2:1 atrioventricular hlock in one patient was presumed to he congenital in origin. In four patients, the VDD system was their first pacing system. In six of the patients, 1–4 previous systems had been used and simultaneous extraction of ventricular leads (6) and/or atrial leads (2) was performed. Four different types of lead were used: Brilliant IMP15Q (Vitatron); Brilliant + IMR15Q (Vitatron): Cap-Sure 5032 (Medtronic); and Unipass 425–13 (Intermedics) witb four different generators: Saphir 600 (Vitatron): Saphir II 620 (Vitatron): Thera VDD 8948 (Medtronic): and Unity 292–07 (Intermedics). All leads were introduced via a suhclavian vein puncture and the atrial dipole was placed low in the right atrium to provide slack for further growth while maintaining atrial sensing. Ventricular thresholds ranged from 0.2–0.8 V. The minimal atrial amplitude was 0.7–4 mV and the maximum amplitude was 2.5–8 mV. There was one early microdisplacement and the lead was repositioned. Over a follow-up period ranging from 1–39 months (mean 20.4 months), all patients have maintained low ventricular pacing thresholds and adequate atrial signals for reliable pacing at rest and with exercise. During this time some bave undergone considerahle growth. The patient with coexisting congenital heart disease died suddenly at 3 years, hut the pacing system had no fault at autopsy. The standard adult size single pass lead provides a simple means to enable reliahle atrial synchronous ventricular pacing in growing children with complete heart hlock.     

Single Lead VDD Pacing: Multicenter Study

Optimal treatment for patients with AV block and normal sinoatrial node (SA) function entails atrial sensing and ventricular pacing (VDD mode). Single-lead VDD pacing preserves AV synchrony, precludes the need to insert two leads, and makes the implanter's work simpler and quicker. Our objectives were to verify the performance of the Thera(tm) VDD pacing system (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), and evaluate the effectiveness of its atrial sensing and its ventricular sensing and pacing. In 165 patients, 150 adults (mean age 62 ± 18 years) and 15 children (mean age 7 ± 5 years) with 1°–3° AV block and normal SA node function, a Thera VDD system (Models 8948 or 8968) was implanted. Intraoperative ventricular electrical measurements were not significantly different from those of VVI pacemakers. The mean amplitude of the atrial signal during implantation was 4.1 ± 1.9 mV. Optimal atrial signals during implantation were usually obtained in the mid or lower part of the right atrium by using a special technique. Adequate atrial measurements remained stable throughout 24 months. There was no difference between serial measurements of atrial signal amplitudes at predischarge and during follow-up visits. Reposition of the lead was done in 2 patients (1.4%), and reprogramming to VVI in 7 patients: due to atrial fibrillation in 3 (1.8%) and due to atrial undersensing in 4 patients (2.4%). Thera VDD pacing is reliable and easy to manage with dependable atrial sensing and ventricular pacing. The survival rate of VDD pacing at 2 years was 96%.     

VDD Single Pass Lead Pacing; Sustained Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardias Unrelated to Retrograde Atrial Activation

Pacemaker mediated tachycardias (PMTs) are a well known complication of P synchronous pacing. Although the initiating mechanisms are severel, all of them are associated with retrograde atrial activation, which is sensed by the atrial sensing channel, resulting in ventricular pacing. In 19 patients suffering from symptomatic AV conduction disturbances and normal sinus node function, a VDD pacing system connected to a single pass ventricular lead with dual chamber electrodes was implanted. The bipolar atrial electrode, floating in the right atrium, was used to detect endocardial atrial electrograms that were differentially processed within the pacemaker for optimal discrimination and filtering of undesirable signals. The widely programmable atrial sensitivity (amplitude and filtering) allowed stable P synchronized ventricular pacing in all patients, but in five of them, sustained PMTs not related to retrograde atrial activation was documented during the follow-up. The common mechanism for the onset and maintenance of these PMTs was traced to the abnormal sensing of the terminal forces of ventricular activation and for of the T wave. The possibility of interferences between ventricular and atrial electrodes (crosstalk) was also considered, The reduction of atrial channel sensitivity represented in all cases the only effective procedure to prevent this type of PMT. In conclusion, the best signal to noise ratio is an important endpoint (o assure the proper function of a single lead VDD pacing system. Furthermore, using the differential amplifier built within the pacemaker, consideration should be given to the optimal mode of rejection of the terminal forces of the QRS and T wave.     

Complications of Single Lead VDD Pacing in 35 Patients with AV Block

The implantation of a VDD system is comparable to that of a VVI system, but its management is associated with typical complications of dual chamber pacing. In 35 patients with symptomatic AV block and normal sinus node function, two different VDD pacing systems were implanted. Most of the complications described and their mode of resolution were common to VDD and DDD pacing; however, the VDD system eliminated the need for two separate leads. We, therefore, favor single lead VDD pacing in the treatment of complete AV block with normal sinus node function.     

Single Pass Lead VDD Pacing in Children and Adolescents

Implantation of permanent pacemakers in children and adolescents is possible but usually is limited to single chamber generators. The natural growth of these patients may require physiological pacing, but until recently two leads were required for this type of pacing. The single pass lead VDD pacing mode makes posible physiological pacing by using only one lead, for both atrial sensing and ventricular sensing and pacing. The feasibility of VDD pacing using endocardial lead was evaluated in 16 children and adolescents with congenital or postsurgical atrioventricular block. Their mean age was 7.9 ± 4.9 years (range 1-16 years) and the smallest patient's weight was 8.2 kg. In all the patients, a single pass pacing lead with atrial sensing rings and bipolar ventricular pacing and sensing capability was implanted through the left or right subclavian vein. The pacemaker generator was implanted in a rectopectoral position. The mean atrial electrogram during the implantation was 4.2 ± 2.1 mV and 2.6 ± 1.9 mV after a mean of 1 week. The ventricular pacing threshold was 0.5 ± 0.2 V; the ventricular pacing impedance was 560 ± 95 Ω and the ventricular electrogram amplitude was 9.9 ± 2.1 mV. This is a first report to demonstrate the feasibility of atrial synchronous ventricular endocardial pacing using a single pass lead in a relatively large group of children and adolescents.     

Clinical Evaluation of a New Single Pass Lead VDD Pacing System

Twenty-five patients with second- to third-degree AV block and normal sinus function (16 males, mean age 60 ± 18; range 15–78 years) underwent implantation of WD pacemakers (THERA VDD, Medtronic, Inc.) with a single pass (SP) lead. Results: During implantation the mean amplitude of the atrial (A) signal was 3.9 ±1.4 mV (range 2.0–7.8 mV). Stable, acceptable A-signals during implantation were usually observed in the mid- or lower part of the right atrium. The lead tip electrical parameters were not compro mised in any patient in order to obtain an acceptable A-signal. To verify VDD device function, patients underwent pacing system analysis on the second day and again 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation. Acute and chronic electrical measurements in the ventricle were similar to those with regular steroid leads. During follow-up tests, stable atrial sensing (A ≥ 0.7mV) was found in all but one patient (in whom A was 0.25–0.5 mV and an intermittent loss of atriai sensing occurred). There was no difference between serial measurements of A-signal amplitudes on the second day or 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation: 1.9 ± 1.3 mV, 1.5 ± 0.6 mV, 1.3 ± 0.8 mV, and 1.5 ± 1.1 mV, respectively. The mean implantation time was 54.0 ± 17 minutes and the mean fluoroscopy time was 3.2 ±1.3 minutes. Conclusions: SP lead VDD pacing is reliable and easy to manage with dependable atriai sensing and ventricular pacing. The significant reduction in atriai postimplantation amplitude is related to the different techniques used for measuring acute and chronic atriai signals.     

Single Pass VDD Pacing in Children and Adolescents

Use of a single pass lead for VDD pacing in complete heart block is well described in adults, but there are only brief reports of its use in children. We have used standard adult size single pass leads in 13 children and adolescents aged 3.7–17.2 years (mean 10.1 years) and weighing 13.5–76 kg (mean 34.8 kg). Congenital complete heart block was present in 7 patients, surgical complete heart block in 5 patients and 2:1 AV block of unknown cause in 1 patient. In four patients, the VDD system was their first pacing system. In nine of the patients, 1–6 previous systems had been used and simultaneous extraction of ventricular leads and/or atrial leads was performed. Leads of four different types were used: Brilliant IMPl5Q, Brilliant + IMR15Q, CapSure 5032, and Unipass 425–13 with 4 different generators: Saphir 600, SaphirII620, Thera VDD 8948, and Unity 292–07. At implantation, via a subclavian vein puncture, excess lead was advanced into the right atrium to allow both atrial sensing and slack for further growth. Ventricular thresholds ranged from 0.2–0.7 V. The minimal atrial amplitude was 0.7–4 mV and the maximum amplitude was 2.5–8 mV. There were no complications. Ail patients have maintained adequate atrial signals for reliable pacing with follow up of 3–36 months (mean 17.6 months) during which time some have undergone considerable growth. Beliable atrial synchronous ventricular pacing is possible in growing children with complete heart block using a standard adult single pass lead.     

A Simple Method for Preoperative Assessment of the Best Fitting Electrode Length in Single Lead VDD Pacing

For single lead VDD pacing, electrodes with various distances between the lead tip and the floating atrial dipole (AV distance) are available. Using different AV distances allows positioning of the atrial dipole in the mid- to high right atrium, regardless of the size of the right heart. In this position, reliable atrial sensing and rejection of ventricular far-field potentials can be expected. A simple test for the preoperative assessment of the best fitting AV distance in the individual patient was tested. We studied 24 consecutive patients prior to implantation of AVDD pacemaker. With the patient in supine position, a test electrode with an AV distance of 13 cm was taped onto the thorax. Under fluoroscopic control, it was moved until its course and projection onto the heart was equal to that of a ventricular lead. If fluoroscopy then showed a projection of the atrial dipole onto the mid- to high right atrium, a lead with a similar AV distance of 13 or 13.5 cm was used for implantation. If the atrial dipole projected itself too high or too low, a shorter or longer lead had to be implanted. The maximum time for the test was 2 minutes, and the maximum fluoroscopy time was 15 seconds. According to the test, a lead with an AV distance of 13 or 13.5 cm was implanted in 18 of 24 patients, and a lead with an AV distance of 15.5 or 16 cm was implanted in 6 of 24 patients. The atrial dipole could easily be positioned in the mid- to high right atrium in all patients, demonstrating a correct preoperative assessment of the best fitting AV distance. Intraoperatively, a P wave amplitude of 3.5 ± 3.0 mV was measured. The described test allows a fast and reliable assessment of the best fitting electrode length in single lead VDD pacing.     

Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?

Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D-net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2-W mobile phone in the digital D-net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.     

Use of Single Lead VDD Pacing in Children

The development of transvenous ventricular pacing leads with proximal electrodes capable of atrial sensing and the recent availability of smaller generators has created the opportunity to treat children with complete AV block and normal sinus node function with a transvenous single lead VDD pacing system. Studies in adults have demonstrated this system to be efficacious with low complication rates. Transvenous single lead VDD pacemakers were implanted in ten children, aged 5–15 years, between December 1993 and April 1996, in our institution. The indications were complete AV block with severe bradycardia in 5 patients, second-degree or complete A V block following congenital heart surgery in 3, complete A V block with long QT syndrome in 1, and second-degree AV block and syncope in 1. There were no complications related to the procedure in any case. P and R wave amplitudes were measured and thresholds were determined intraoperatively on all patients. Amplitudes and thresholds were remeasured on seven patients with a mean follow-up of 17 months; Holter monitors were performed on seven patients with a mean follow-up of 16 months. P and H wave amplitudes were generally diminished at follow-up compared to initial values but remained within an acceptable range for all patients. Four patients required reprogramming after pacemaker insertion, 1 received an atrial lead for dual chamber pacing, 1 required repositioning for lead dislodgment. and 1 patient required a new lead for an inadequate ventricular pacing threshold. No patient had evidence of failure to sense or capture as evaluated by Halter monitoring at last follow-up. Single lead VDD pacing systems can be successfully used in properly selected children with high degree or complete AV block with normal sinus node function.     

VDD(R) Pacing: Short- and Long-Term Stability of Atrial Sensing with a Single Lead System

Background: Recent studies have shown that the atrial signal can reliably be sensed for VDD(R) pacing via atrial floating electrodes incorporated in a single-pass lead. However, there remains concern about the long-term stability of atrial sensing and proper VDD function under real-life conditions. This study investigated the long-term reliability of atrial sensing and atrioventricular synchronous pacing using a new single lead VDD(R) pacing system. Methods and Results: In 20 consecutive patients (ages 71 ± 14 years) with normal sinus node function and high-degree heart block, a single lead VDD(R) pacemaker (Unity(tm), Intermedics) was implanted, Atrial sensing was studied at implantation, at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of follow-up. At implant, the measured P wave amplitude was 2.3 ± 1.2 mV. By telemetry, the atrial sensing threshold was 0.79 ± 0.41 mV at discharge, 0.75 ± 0.43 mV at 1 month, 0.73 ± 0.43 mV at 3 months, 0.76 ± 0.41 mV at 6 months, 0.79 ± 0.41 mV at 12 months, and 0.77 ± 0.35 mV at 18 months of follow-up (P = NS). Appropriate VDD pacing was assessed by the percentage of correct atrial synchronization (PAS = atrial triggered ventricular paced complexes ± total number of ventricular paced complexes) during repeated Holters. PAS was 99.99%± 0.01 % at 1 month, 99.99%± 0.02% at 3 months, and 99.98%± 0.05% at 12 months of follow-up (P = NS). No atrial oversensing with inappropriate ventricular pacing was observed, neither during isometric arm exercise testing nor spontaneously during Holier monitoring. Conclusion: The long-term stability of atrial sensing with almost 100% correct atrial synchronous tracking and the lack of inappropriate pacing due to atrial oversensing make the new Unity VDD(R) system a highly reliable single lead pacing system. In view of the lower costs and the ease of single lead implantation, this system may offer an interesting alternative to DDD pacemakers in patients with normal sinus node function.     

A New Single Lead VDD Pacing System

PERCOCO, G.F., ET AL.: A New Single Lead VDD Pacing System. In 24 patients with advanced heart block and normal sinus node function, a new single lead VDD pacing system was implanted. At implantation, the endoatrial, bipolar electrogram was recorded in all patients. The lead position was checked by means of chest X-ray. At discharge and after 1, 3, and 6 months, testing for myopotential inhibition, telemetric evaluation of the endoatrial potential, and Holter recordings were made. After discharge, 18 patients performed two cardiopulmonary exercise tests at two different rate-matched AV intervals. All investigations showed good AV synchrony and a lack of interferences by myopotentials. The maximum rate-matched AV interval provided a significantly improved exercise capacity, which was more evident in patients with signs of myocardial failure.     

Atrial Synchronous Ventricular Inhibited Pacing (VDD): An Underutilized Mode of Pacing

Après ľintroduction de la stimulation en VAT, le mode stimulation en VDD représente un progrés. Ses bénéfices physiologiques sont maintenant bien prouvés alors que cette stimulation n'est utilisée que dans 1 % des cas. Les progrés de la program-mation de la période refractaire auriculaire permettant de maitriser les tachycardies induites laissent espérer une augmentation du pourcentage ďutilisation du mode de stimulation en VDD chez les malades porteurs ďun bloc de haul degré induit par ľeffort et avec fonction sinusale stable.
The design of atrial synchronous, ventricular inhibited (VDD) pacemakers has been improved. Physiologic long-term benefit has now been established, although this mode of pacing accounts for approximately one percent of implanted devices. With the ultimate control of pacemaker-mediated lachycardia through atrial refractory programming close at hand or already available, one might expecl an increase in VDD pacing in patients with exercise-induced high degree heart block and stable sinus node function.     

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Single Lead VDD Stimulation

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term results of a single lead VDD pacing system (Phymos MPS) in 85 patients (48 males, 37 females, mean age 74 ± 9 years). The system, which incorporates two atrial floating electrodes (Phymos 830-S). was implanted for second- or third-degree Mobitz II AV block. The percentage of AV synchronized pacing, the presence of fusion beats due to short AV delay, and the occurrence of supraventricuiar arrhythmias was evaluated by Holter monitoring at 6-month intervals. Over a mean period of follow-up of 44 months (range 2–56), over 90% of AV synchronized pacing events were noted in 74 patients (87%). The presence of persistent fusion beats was detected in 12 patients (14%). In ten patients the pacemaker was reprogrammed to VVI mode for supraventricuiar arrhythmias (7 patients, 8.2%) or unsatisfactory atrial sensing (3 patients, 3.5%). One pacemaker was removed for pocket infection and two for battery depletion. These observations support the use of VDD single lead pacing to combine a physiological mode of stimulation with simple implantation techniques.     

Experience and Implantation Techniques with a New Single-Pass Lead VDD Pacing System

Thirty-six patients were implanted with a single-lead atrial-synchronous ventricular pacing (VDD) system at our center in the first and second phases of a clinical trial between October 1987 and December 1989. The clinical system comprised a pulse generator in conjunction with a pacing lead incorporating two diagonal atrial bipolar (DAB) electrodes designed to lie in the mid-to upper-right atrium and a distal tip electrode for ventricular pacing and sensing. Twenty five of the patients had complete heart block, ten had second-degree block, and one had AV nodal block. A modified Bruce protocol limiting treadmill speed to 1.7 miles per hour was used to establish sinus node competency as evidenced by sustained sinus rate increase in a more-or-less linear fashion. The mean acute P wave amplitude measured at implant was 1.66 mV +/- 1.04 SD; the mean P wave amplitude (minimum and maximum, both sitting and supine) for all patients at all follow-up (N = 420) was 1.54 mV +/- 0.9 SD. The follow-up interval for all patients ranged from a minimum of 13 days and a maximum of 762 days, with a mean of 261 +/- 206 days as of December 1, 1989. Four dislodgments of the ventricular electrode occurred with the more pliable of two passive fixation mechanisms used on the lead; atrial sensing remained intact at all times with both fixation systems. Changes in atrial sensing threshold were quite frequent during the early follow-up visits due to electrode movement in the right atrium; however, adequate ventricular tracking of the atrial rate was achieved in all cases once the threshold values were established initially, even though several patients required atrial sensing of 0.2 mV at some of the follow-up visits. Two patients presented with pacemaker-mediated tachycardia associated with retrograde conduction, which was resolved with reprogramming; they are presently maintaining atrial synchrony in the VDD mode. Successful single-lead VDD pacing with consistent P wave sensing has been achieved with this atrial rate responsive system.     

Italian Multicenter Study on a Single Lead VDD Pacing System Using a Narrow Atrial Dipole Spacing

Since November 1988, 514 patients with advanced atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinoatrial function have received the single lead VDD pacing system Twinal 30 Lem/CCS in 30 Italian centers. At implantation, particular attention was paid to the correct positioning of the atrial dipole in the mid- to mid-high right atrium and to the atrial electrogram characteristics. The follow-up included a chest X ray, to be performed before discharge of the patient from the hospital, telemetric evaluations of the endoatrial potential, provocative tests for interferences by myopotentials, 24-hour ambulatory EGG recordings, and where possible, exercise stress tests. The mean follow-up duration was 15.2 months, ranging from 1 to 42 months. A very low percentage of chronic atrial fibrillation, loss of atrial sensing, and system replacement was reported, most of the patients (93.5%) being paced in VDD mode. All investigations indicated an excellent overall system performance, stable AV synchrony, and infrequent myopotential interference, and a low complication rate throughout the follow-up period.     

Determining Optimal Atrial Sensitivity Settings for Single Lead VDD Pacing: The Importance of the P Wave Histogram

In order to provide atrioventricular synchrony, VDD pacing systems require reliable atrial sensing. Variations in atrial signals with exercise and daily activities may lead to undersensing, with loss of physiological pacing. The aim of this study was to determine, for a single lead VDD pacing system, the maximal variation in atrial signals in order to facilitate optimal programming of atrial sensitivity. Fifteen patients underwent implantation of a Vitatron Saphir VDD pacemaker with a Vitatron Brilliant electrode. At a mean (± SD) follow-up of 67.3 ± 38.8 days, resting P wave amplitude was compared with the P wave amplitude histogram obtained from the pacemaker, which recorded atrial signals over the preceding 30 days. Resting P wave amplitude was also compared with P wave amplitudes during variations in posture, respiration, and during exercise. P wave amplitude showed great variation with changes in posture and respiration, but there was no consistent increase or reduction. During exercise, the mean P wave amplitude fell hy 36.6%± 31.3% compared with the resting value (P < 0.05). During daily activities, 22.6% of P wave amplitudes recorded on the P wave histogram were < 0.5 mV. The smallest P wave amplitudes were detected by the P wave histogram in 11 (79%) of 14 patients. These data suggest that atrial sensitivity may need to be programmed higher than that indicated by single readings or exercise. The P wave amplitude histogram is the most reliable indicator of the smallest atrial signal and should be used to opthnize atrial sensitivity settings.     

Temporary Pacing in Complete Heart Block due to Lyme Disease: A Case Report

The authors present the case of a 44-year-old man who was admitted with complete heart block and signs of severe bradycardia. After steroid administration and temporary pacemaker treatment the complete heart block resolved. During this therapy transient ST segment and T wave abnormalities occurred. The positive Borrelia burgdorferi antibody titer arrived only after therapy had been completed. This is regarded as the first case of Lyme carditis with complete heart block diagnosed in eastern Europe. Carditis resolved without antibiotic treatment and has not recurred.     

Recipient P Wave Synchronized Pacing of the Donor Atrium in a Heart-Transplanted Patient: A Case Study

We present the case of a 23-year-old patient who underwent orthotopic heart implantation and subsequent implantation of an atrial dual chamber pacemaker. The stimulation rate in the donor atrium is controlled by the recipient's sinus node activity, thereby maintaining AV synchrony and allowing appropriate rate increase during exercise.