Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography

The purpose of the study was to compare the image quality of film-screen (FS) and computed radiography (CR) for adult chest examinations across a range of beam energies. A series of images of the CDRAD threshold contrast detail detection phantom were acquired for a range of tube potential and exposure levels with both CR and FS. The phantom was placed within 9 cm of Perspex to provide attenuation and realistic levels of scatter in the image. Hardcopy images of the phantom were scored from a masked light-box by two scorers. Threshold contrast indices were used to calculate a visibility index (VI). The relationships between dose and image quality for CR and for FS are fundamentally different. The improvements in VIs obtained using CR at 75 kVp and 90 kVp were found to be statistically significant compared with 125 kVp at matched effective dose levels. The relative performance of FS and CR varies as a function of energy owing to the different k-edges of each system. When changing from FS to CR, the use of lower tube potentials may allow image quality to be maintained whilst reducing effective dose. A tube voltage of 90 kVp is indicated by this work, but may require clinical verification.     

Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate patient radiation doses in projection radiography after the transition to computed radiography (CR) in the authors' hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hospital's ethical committee approved the study and waived informed consent. In 2001, a dose reduction initiative was implemented, which involved collecting radiographic parameters, calculating patient entrance doses, and monitoring changes with an online computer, and a training program for radiographers was conducted. A database with 204 660 patient dose values was used to compute changes in patient doses over time. Sample sizes ranged from 1800 to 23 000 examinations. Doses were compared with European and American reference values. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Median values for patient entrance doses increased 40%-103% after implementation of CR. Initial increases were corrected during the 1st year, and additional dose decreases were achieved after the dose reduction initiative was launched. At present, doses range between 15% and 38% of the European diagnostic reference levels established for screen-film radiography and between 28% and 41% of the reference values recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, representing an effective 20%-50% reduction in the initial values for CR. CONCLUSION: Though patient doses can increase considerably during the transition from conventional screen-film radiography to CR, dose management programs, including specific training of radiographers and patient dose audits, allow for reductions of the previous values.     

Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems

Abdominal x-ray examinations represent a variety of indications with different demands on exposure latitude, contrast resolution and spatial resolution of screen-film system combinations. The diagnostic value of digital luminescent radiography (DLR) was thus compared to conventional x-ray examinations carried out with screen-film systems, speed class 200, by analysing matched digital and conventional exposures in 46 abdominal and 25 pelvic x-ray examinations in supine and left lateral view, 156 contrast examinations of the gastrointestinal tract, 140 excretory urographies, 8 cholecystographies, 22 lymphographies and in 6 phlebographies. The digital exposure dose was 50% of the conventional one. In DLR two differently post-processed images were obtained from one x-ray exposure: a display with low spatial frequency enhancement was processed to look like a conventional radiograph and was complemented by a display with high spatial frequency enhancement. Analysing the results statistically, DLR proved to be diagnostically equivalent to conventional radiography despite the reduction in exposure dose and the lower digital spatial resolution. Since high spatial frequency enhancement did not provide further diagnostic information and eventually resulted in border line artifacts, high spatial frequency enhancement is superfluous in abdominal x-ray examinations.     

Mobile chest imaging of neonates in incubators: Optimising DR and CR acquisitions

IntroductionNeonates are a particularly vulnerable patient group with complex medical needs requiring frequent radiographic examinations. This study aims to compare computed radiography (CR) and direct digital radiography (DDR) portable imaging systems used to acquire chest x-rays for neonates within incubators.MethodsAn anthropomorphic neonatal chest phantom was imaged under controlled conditions using one portable machine but captured using both CR and DDR technology. Other variables explored were: image receptor position (direct and incubator tray), tube current and kV. All other parameters were kept consistent. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured using ImageJ software and dose-area-product (DAP) was recorded. Optimisation score was calculated by dividing CNR with the DAP for each image acquisition.ResultsThe images with the highest CNR were those acquired using DDR direct exposures and the images with lowest CNR were those acquired using CR with the image receptor placed within the incubator tray. This is also supported by the optimisation scores which demonstrated DDR direct produced the optimal combination with regards to CNR and radiation dose. The CNR had a mean increase of 50.3% when comparing DDR direct with CR direct respectively. This was also evident when comparing DDR and CR for in-tray acquisitions, with CNR increasing by a mean of 43.5%. A mean increase of 20.4% was seen in CNR when comparing DDR tray exposures to CR direct.ConclusionDDR direct produced images of highest CNR, with incubator tray reducing CNR for both CR and DDR. However, DDR tray still had better image quality compared to CR direct.Implications for practiceWhere possible, DDR should be the imaging system of choice for portable examinations on neonates owing to its superior image quality at lower radiation dose.     

An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine

Studies have indicated that computed radiography (CR) can increase radiation dose to the patient, leading to potential biological effects. Although manufacturers have set parameters to safeguard against overexposure, it is unclear whether these are being used by radiographers or if their recommended values are consistent with the ALARA principle. The research aims are to investigate (i) whether radiographers are producing images with exposure indices within the manufacturers recommended range (MRR); (ii) the phenomenon of exposure creep, and (iii) the relationship between exposure indices (EIs) and radiation dose. A retrospective analysis of exposure indices over an 18-month period for the posteroanterior (PA) chest and lateral (LAT) lumbar spine at two centres using Kodak 800 and 850 CR systems was conducted. A phantom study was performed to assess the relationship between EI and entrance surface dose (ESD) for fixed and varying tube potentials. Kodak recommends that images have EIs between 1700 and 1900. Thirty percent of LAT lumbar spine examinations at hospital B and 38% of PA chest examinations at hospital A were produced with EIs below 1700. In the phantom study, when using a varied tube potential (70-125 kVp) and maintaining a constant EI of 1550, ESD was reduced by 56%. All clinical and phantom images were assessed to be of a diagnostic quality. The retrospective results indicate that there is a potential to reduce the MRR and optimize patient dose. There is also evidence to suggest that EI is not a reliable indicator of patient dose. The authors recommend that staff training is essential on these newer systems.     

X射线胸部摄影曝光剂量与图像质量相关性研究

目的 研究数字化X射线胸部高千伏摄影曝光剂量与图像质量的关系,确定数字化X射线摄影最佳曝光剂量。方法 选择胸部高千伏摄影管电压120 kV,摄影mAs从1 mAs逐档增加至25 mAs,对模拟人体胸部厚度摄影体模与CDRAD 2.0对比度细节体模进行摄影,测量体模表面X射线入射剂量,由5位观察者独立阅读体模影像,比较任意两曝光条件组之间的图像质量因子（IQF）,确定高千伏胸部摄影最佳条件。比较4和10 mAs条件下正常人体胸部摄影图像质量评分。结果 胸部高千伏摄影体模曝光条件从1 mAs增加到25 mAs,体模表面X射线入射剂量从0.067 mGy增加至1.468 mGy。随着X射线入射剂量的增加,影像质量影响因子IQF值不断减小,观察者阅读体模信号的IQF差异有统计学意义（F=31.00,P<0.05）,曝光剂量条件选择在1~4 mAs时所对应的IQF均值差异有统计学意义（F=15.3,P<0.05）,4~10 mAs时所对应的IQF差异无统计学意义,10~25 mAs时所对应的IQF均值差异有统计学意义（F=9.74,P<0.05）。曝光剂量条件选择4和10 mAs所对应的体模表面入射剂量为0.250和0.606 mGy,两种条件下胸部图像质量的综合评分分别为（24.8±1.64）、（25.8±2.05）分,差异无统计学意义。结论 随着数字化X射线摄影剂量的增加所获得图像信息量增加。满足临床诊断的标准人体胸部高千伏数字化X摄影最佳剂量为0.250 mGy左右。     

Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations

In diagnostic radiology increasing attention has been focused on dose reduction while maintaining a clinically good image quality. With the use of digital detectors balancing dose vs image quality is done differently than in film-screen radiography, since dose and image brightness are uncoupled in digital imaging. In this study a new direct digital detector (flat-panel detector) was used in a dose-image optimisation of a simulated pelvic examination. X-ray images were taken with a direct digital detector (DDD), of the pelvic of a phantom using varying tube current (varying stochastic noise). The entrance surface dose was measured for each image. These images were scored by two radiologists according to EU guidelines. A dose comparison was made with an older PCR system (storage phosphor plates). With decreasing tube current the noise in the images increased and the image with the lowest dose and still acceptable image quality was identified. The results showed that the entrance surface dose using the DDD decreased from 1.4 mGy (PCR value) to 0.48 mGy (DDD standard settings). Through the optimisation the dose could be further decreased to 0.24 mGy while still maintaining an acceptable image quality. A substantial dose reduction was obtained with this new direct digital detector. This simple but efficient optimisation approach is easily applicable to other examinations and both DDD and storage phosphor plate detectors.     

CR与非晶体硅DR胸部摄影曝光剂量优化的探讨

目的 比较CR与非晶体硅DR在胸部摄影中入射剂量的差异,探讨两者最优化曝光剂量.方法 应用CR、DR分别别胸部模体行不同入射剂量曝光成像,记录模体表面入射剂量,用CDRAD2.0评估软件计算模体影像图像质量因子反数值IQFinv.CR组、DR组图像IQFinv差异用两独立样本t检验;CR组、DR组各自图像IQFinv与入射剂量的关系应用pearson相关;应用ROC曲线分析获取两组最佳图像IQFinv值,并换算曝光剂量.结果 CR和DR组入射剂量和图像质量IQFinv值之间呈明显的正相关(r=0.893、0.848,P<0.01),并存在线性回归.CR和DR组IQFinv值差异有统计学意义(t=5.455,P<0.05).ROC曲线分析(曲线下面积AUC=0.893,P<0.001),最佳IQFinv值为3.55.结论 CR、DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力均随着入射剂量的增加而增加.入射剂量相同时,DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力优于CR;在获得相同的图像质量时,与CR相比应用DR可大大降低被榆者辐射剂量.     

CR与非晶体硅DR胸部摄影曝光剂量优化的探讨

目的 比较CR与非晶体硅DR在胸部摄影中入射剂量的差异,探讨两者最优化曝光剂量.方法 应用CR、DR分别别胸部模体行不同入射剂量曝光成像,记录模体表面入射剂量,用CDRAD2.0评估软件计算模体影像图像质量因子反数值IQFinv.CR组、DR组图像IQFinv差异用两独立样本t检验;CR组、DR组各自图像IQFinv与入射剂量的关系应用pearson相关;应用ROC曲线分析获取两组最佳图像IQFinv值,并换算曝光剂量.结果 CR和DR组入射剂量和图像质量IQFinv值之间呈明显的正相关(r=0.893、0.848,P<0.01),并存在线性回归.CR和DR组IQFinv值差异有统计学意义(t=5.455,P<0.05).ROC曲线分析(曲线下面积AUC=0.893,P<0.001),最佳IQFinv值为3.55.结论 CR、DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力均随着入射剂量的增加而增加.入射剂量相同时,DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力优于CR;在获得相同的图像质量时,与CR相比应用DR可大大降低被榆者辐射剂量.     

A study of entrance surface dose with CR and film/screen systems, and analysis of the X-ray conditions for chest radiography

Several previous studies have indicated that the medical exposure dose(entrance surface dose) is lower with Computed Radiography(CR) than with the Film/Screen(F/S) system. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 1,297 hospitals regarding the radiation exposure conditions of X-ray examinations. From the survey results, we calculated the entrance surface dose(first quartile, median, third quartile, and mean) using the NDD calculation method. In the case of chest radiography(adult patients) by CR, the entrance surface dose was 150% of the median value for the overall examination and 160% of the median value for orthochromatic screen systems. The CR exposure set-up using a lower voltage and higher mAs than the F/S method was found to result in a high entrance surface dose. We also found a difference in patient dose among hospitals using CR. Mean surface dose in CR system was 0.12 mGy in a quartile, 0.19 mGy in the middle and 0.27 mGy in the third quartile. Among the hospitals which showed higher doses of third quatile them above mentioned, dose differences of a quartile were distributed 2 to 10 times higher them mean exposure doses.     

Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To assess and quantify the dose reduction by use of a CsI-flat panel digital radiography (DR)-system compared with digital computed radiography (CR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A TCDD-test using the CDRAD-phantom was performed at mAs-values of 5, 4, 2.5, 2, 1, and 0.5 mAs for both digital systems. Entrance surface doses were recorded for all images. Images were presented to four independent observers. For quantitative comparison the image quality figure (IQF) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation and the Wilcoxon test. A ROC analysis was performed using the TRG-phantom. Settings of 4, 2.5, 2 mAs for both systems were used. In addition, 1 and 0.5 mAs were used for the DR system only. Statistical significance was evaluated using Student test. RESULTS: The DR system provided equivalent results compared with CR with respect to high frequency information and superior results with respect to low contrast details. Compared with computed radiography, the flat panel detector demonstrated significantly lower IQFs, ensuring a better image quality with respect to contrast and detail detectability. IQFs for DR and CR were equal at a surface dose reduction of 87% for DR. ROC analysis revealed significantly higher values under the curve for DR up to a surface dose reduction of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Image quality of DR proved to be far superior to CR in particular for low contrast details. The image quality of CR is similar to that of DR only at high dose levels.     

Investigation of beam quality for digital chest radiography with RbBr:Tl(+) photostimulable storage phosphors

Beam quality for digital chest radiography in digital radiography systems (DR systems) with RbBr:Tl(+) photostimulable storage phosphors was investigated. Measurements of overall Wiener spectrum (overall WS) and observer performance experiments by means of Scheffé's method of paired comparisons were performed under the same exposure (5.16x10(-7)C/kg) at the X-ray detector of DR systems (sampling distance: 175 micro m, 2,048x2,048 pixels, 12 bits, look-up table: THX2) with a phantom lung and metacryl plates. Overall WS values were indicated to be inferior at higher tube voltages. All of the overall WS values were greater than those of screen film systems (HGM/UR1:S/F) at radiographic density 0.50, which was considered the density of the mediastinum and the area below the diaphragm (low density area), and at radiographic densities 1.00 and 1.50, considered as lung, WS values of S/F were located between the overall WS values of 80 kV and 100 kV, and 120 kV and 140 kV, respectively. Evaluation of visibility including mediastinum, lung, and total were indicated to be superior at the lower tube voltages. In evaluation of the mediastinum, the base image, which was obtained by 100 kV tube voltage (effective energy: 46.0 kV) in this study, was not significant from 90 kV to 110 kV tube voltages (range, +/-10 kV), and in-lung and total evaluations were not significant from 90 kV to 120 kV (range, -10 kV to +20 kV), and from 80 kV to 120 kV (range, +/-20 kV) tube voltages by 99% confidence interval. In conclusion, optimal beam quality for digital chest radiography with RbBr:Tl(+) photostimulable storage phosphors was considered to be less than 110 kV tube voltage (effective energy, 47.9 keV) in 0.1 mm copper and 3.8 mm aluminum total filtration. In this case, the granularity in low-density areas were inferior to those of S/F systems but nearly equal to the middle and high-density areas of chest images, and exposure dose was 14.3% lower than that of the base image obtained by 100 kV (effective energy, 46.0 keV) tube voltage in this study.     

Physical image properties of digital radiography systems in low dose range

We measured physical image properties of a flat panel detector (FPD) system and a computed radiography (CR) system, targeting to a low dose range (reference dose: 2.58×10(-7) C/kg: to 1/20 dose). Input-output properties, pre-sampled modulation transfer functions (pre-sampled MTFs), and normalized noise power spectra for an FPD system equipped with a CsI scintillator (FPDcsi) and a CR system with an imaging plate coated with storage phosphor (CR) were measured at the low dose range for radiation quality of RQA3 (?50 skV) and RQA5 (?70 kV), and detective quantum efficiencies (DQEs) were calculated. In addition, in order to validate the DQE results, component fractions of Poisson and multiplicative and additive noise were analyzed using relative standard deviation analysis. The DQE values of FPDcsi were decreased with dose decrease, and contrarily to these, those of CR were increased. At the 1/10 and 1/20 doses for RQA3, the DQEs of FPDcsi and CR became almost the same. From the results of RSD analysis, it was proved that the main cause of DQE deterioration on FPDcsi are non-negligible additive (electronic) noise, and the DQE improvement on CR was caused by both of significant multiplicative (structure) noise and very low electronic noise. The DQE results were validated by comparing burger phantom images of each dose and radiation quality.     

两种数字化X射线摄影技术影像质量与成像剂量的比较

目的对比研究非晶硒平板探测器直接数字化X射线摄影(DR)及计算机x射线摄影(CR)两种数字化X射线摄影技术影像质量与吸收剂量的关系。方法应用DR和CR系统分别对对比度．细节体模(CDRAD2．0)进行不同吸收剂量的曝光成像。记录每次曝光的体模表面吸收剂量，并将所获取的影像在图像诊断工作站显示器上由4位观片者进行观察，计算影像质量表征因子(IQF)。应用ANOVA检验法统计、比较两种数字化摄影技术的图像质量与吸收剂量的差别。结果与CR相比，DR具有更低的IQF值，对人体组织对比度和结构细节有更好的信息检出特性。两种成像技术产生相同IQF值时，DR系统在体模表面产生的表面剂量比CR系统降低了77％。结论DR技术对于低对比度组织细节的检测好于CR技术。在获得相同影像信息的前提下，与CR相比应用DR大大降低了被检者吸收剂量。     

CR与非晶体硅DR胸部摄影曝光剂量优化的探讨

目的 比较CR与非晶体硅DR在胸部摄影中入射剂量的差异,探讨两者最优化曝光剂量。方法 应用CR、DR分别对胸部模体行不同入射剂量曝光成像,记录模体表面入射剂量,用CDRAD2.0评估软件计算模体影像图像质量因子反数值IQFinv。CR组、DR组图像IQFinv差异用两独立样本t 检验;CR组、DR组各自图像IQFinv与入射剂量的关系应用pearson相关;应用ROC曲线分析获取两组最佳图像IQFinv值,并换算曝光剂量。结果 CR和DR组入射剂量和图像质量IQFinv值之间呈明显的正相关(r =0.893、0.848, P<0.01),并存在线性回归。CR和DR组IQFinv值差异有统计学意义(t =5.455, P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析(曲线下面积AUC＝0.893, P<0.001),最佳IQFinv值为3.55。结论 CR、DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力均随着入射剂量的增加而增加。入射剂量相同时,DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力优于CR;在获得相同的图像质量时,与CR相比应用DR可大大降低被检者辐射剂量。     

Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography

New flat-panel direct digital radiography equipment has recently been installed in our Accident and Emergency Department; its characteristics and versatility are well suited to the work undertaken in this environment. The aim of this study was to compare radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations using conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography; entrance surface dose and effective dose were calculated for six standard examinations (a total of 10 projections) using standard patient exposure parameters for the three imaging modalities. It was found that doses for computed radiography (all examinations) were higher than the doses for the other two modalities; effective doses for direct digital radiography were approximately 29% and approximately 43% lower than those for screen-film radiography and computed radiography, respectively. The image quality met the criteria in the European guidelines for all modalities.     

Fact or fiction: An analysis of the 10 kVp ‘rule’ in computed radiography

PurposeTo determine whether increasing the tube voltage by 10 kVp whilst reducing the tube current by 50% (10 kVp ‘rule’) produces similar perceptual image quality.Method391 matched pairs of anthropomorphic chest phantom X-ray images were produced on a computed radiography (CR) system. Five experienced clinicians graded the images using a 2 alternative forced choice comparison method. Based on acquisition parameters and dose area product (DAP) readings, effective dose (E) was calculated for all images using dose calculation software.ResultsPerceptual image quality scores prior to and following application of the 10 kVp ‘rule’ were found have no statistical difference (p > 0.1), indicating that the increase in kVp and reduction in mAs had limited impact on the perceptual image quality. In all cases E reduced, with an average 36% (s.d 7%) after the ‘rule’ had been applied (p < 0.001).ConclusionResults demonstrate that application of the 10 kVp ‘rule’ significantly reduces E, with no significant reduction in perceptual image quality. Further research should be conducted for a range of examinations using CR and digital radiography (DR) systems.     

碘化铯/非晶硅数字摄影系统拍摄胸片的适宜管电压:高千伏摄影是否适用于间接DR

目的探索碘化铯/非晶硅数字摄影系统(间接DR)拍摄胸片的适宜管电压。方法(1)分别对60名正常成人拍摄80、100、150 kV正位胸片,由5位放射科医师对比每人的3张图像质量,对多个解剖部位的显示情况和图像总体印象进行评分;(2)分别固定表面入射剂量和出射剂量,对人胸部体模拍摄80、100、120、150 kV正位胸片,对肺内模拟病变进行评分。结果成人胸片和肺内模拟病变的显示均随管电压增高,图像质量降低;80 kV对比度最好,但外观略接近低千伏摄影胸片。结论间接DR拍摄正位胸片的适宜管电压为80~100 kV,高千伏摄影不再适用于DR。     

CR摄影与屏-片摄影的比较

目的探讨CR摄影与屏-片系统摄影曝光条件及对患者的X射线辐射剂量，评价CR摄影的应用价值。方法取本院CR照片和常规X射线摄影照片各2500份，由2位主管技师和1位副主任技师对照片按部位分组进行分析，统计出甲、乙、丙及废片率；并对乙、丙及废片产生的原因进行分析。结果①照片质量：CR摄影照片甲级片率63．6％，乙级片率27．2％，丙级片率9．2％，废片率0％；屏-片系统摄影照片甲级片率40．2％，乙级片率42．4％，丙级片率15．6％，废片率1．8％。②摄影条件的比较：CR数字摄影比屏．片系统摄影电压需提高1-6kV，曝光量高20％左右。结论CR数字摄影照片质量明显高于屏-片系统摄影，但曝光条件比屏-片系统高，相对增加了患者的X射线辐射剂量。     

Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare clinical chest radiographs of a large-area, flat-panel digital radiography system and a conventional film-screen radiography system. The comparison was based on an observer preference study of image quality and visibility of anatomic structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine follow-up chest radiographs were obtained from 100 consecutive oncology patients using a large-area, amorphous silicon flat-panel detector digital radiography system (dose equivalent to a 400-speed film system). Hard-copy images were compared with previous examinations of the same individuals taken on a conventional film-screen system (200-speed). Patients were excluded if changes in the chest anatomy were detected or if the time interval between the examinations exceeded 1 year. Observer preference was evaluated for the image quality and the visibility of 15 anatomic structures using a five-point scale. RESULTS: Dose measurements with a chest phantom showed a dose reduction of approximately 50% with the digital radiography system compared with the film-screen radiography system. The image quality and the visibility of all but one anatomic structure of the images obtained with the digital flat-panel detector system were rated significantly superior (p < or = 0.0003) to those obtained with the conventional film-screen radiography system. CONCLUSION: The image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on the images obtained by the flat-panel detector system were perceived as equal or superior to the images from conventional film-screen chest radiography. This was true even though the radiation dose was reduced approximately 50% with the digital flat-panel detector system.