Adjuvant therapy of Dukes' A, B, and C adenocarcinoma of the colon with portal-vein fluorouracil hepatic infusion: preliminary results of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-02

Between March 1984 and July 1988, 1,158 patients with Dukes' A, B, and C carcinoma of the colon were entered into National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol C-02. Patients were randomized to either no further treatment following curative resection or to postoperative fluorouracil (5-FU) and heparin administered via the portal vein. Therapy began on day of operation and consisted of constant infusion for 7 successive day. Average time on study was 41.8 months. A comparison between the two groups of patients indicated both an improvement in disease-free survival (74% v 64% at 4 years, overall P = .02) and a survival advantage (81% v 73% at 4 years, overall P = .07) in favor of the chemotherapy-treated group. When compared with the treated group, patients who received no further treatment had 1.26 times the risk of developing a treatment failure and 1.25 times the likelihood of dying after 4 years. Particularly significant was the failure to demonstrate an advantage from 5-FU in decreasing the incidence of hepatic metastases. The liver was the first site of treatment failure in 32.9% of 82 patients with documented recurrences in the control group and in 46.3% of 67 patients who received additional treatment. Therapy is administered via a regional route to affect the incidence of recurrence within the perfused anatomic boundary. Since, in this study, adjuvant portal-vein 5-FU infusion failed to reduce the incidence of hepatic metastases, it may be concluded that its use thus far is not justified. It may also be speculated that the disease-free survival and survival advantages (the latter of borderline significance) are a result of the systemic effects of 5-FU.     

Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FU+LV) with that of fluorouracil and levamisole (FU+LEV) or with the combination of FU+LV and levamisole (FU+LV+LEV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and December 1990, 2,151 patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the colon were entered onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowl Project protocol C-04. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FU+LV (weekly regimen), FU + LEV, or the combination of FU+LV+LEV. The average time on study was 86 months. RESULTS: A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV or FU+LEV disclosed a prolongation in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the FU+LV group (65% v 60%; P =.04); there was a small prolongation in overall survival that was of borderline significance (74% v 70%; P =.07). There was no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU+LV or FU+LV+LEV for either DFS (65% v 64%; P =.67) or overall survival (74% v 73%; P =.99). There was no interaction between Dukes' stage and the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon, treatment with FU+LV seems to confer a small DFS advantage and a borderline prolongation in overall survival when compared with treatment with FU+LEV. The addition of LEV to FU+LV does not provide any additional benefit over and above that achieved with FU+LV. These findings support the use of adjuvant FU+LV as an acceptable therapeutic standard in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon.     

Findings from recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies in stage I breast cancer.

Before 1989, credible information about the treatment of breast cancer was derived mainly from randomized clinical trials that enrolled women with either metastatic (stage IV); locally advanced (stage III); or primary, operable, axillary lymph node-positive (stage II) disease. This report provides information from six recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trials involving lymph node-negative (stage I) patients. Findings from NSABP B-13 demonstrated, through 14 years of follow-up, improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival from methotrexate and fluorouracil (MF), regardless of age, in women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors. Results from NSABP B-19, which was conducted with similar patients, demonstrated, through 8 years, a greater overall DFS and survival advantage with cyclophosphamide and MF (CMF) than that observed with MF. Findings from NSABP B-23, in which patients similar to those in B-13 and B-19 were randomly assigned to receive CMF plus placebo, CMF plus tamoxifen (TAM), doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (AC) plus placebo, or AC plus TAM, demonstrated no difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival among the four groups through 5 years, either for all patients or relative to age. NSABP B-14, which was carried out in women with ER-positive tumors, compared the outcomes of those who received either placebo or TAM. Through 14 years, superior DFS and overall survival advantages, as well as a reduction in contralateral breast cancer, were observed with TAM. No additional benefit resulted from TAM administration beyond 5 years. Findings from NSABP B-20, a second study conducted in patients with ER-positive tumors, showed, after 8 years, both a DFS and an overall survival advantage from TAM plus either MF or CMF over that achieved with TAM alone. A recent meta-analysis in women with negative lymph nodes and either ER-negative or ER-positive tumors of less than or equal to 1 cm in size was conducted using patients from five NSABP trials. After 8 years, the RFS in women with ER-negative tumors was greater in the group treated with surgery and chemotherapy than in those who underwent surgery alone. In women with ER-positive tumors, RFS and overall survival advantages were observed from the addition of chemotherapy to TAM when that treatment regimen was compared with TAM alone. In addition, evidence has been presented from NSABP B-21, a trial evaluating radiation therapy (XRT) and/or TAM for the prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy in women with tumors less than or equal to 1 cm. Findings have shown that XRT is superior to TAM and that XRT + TAM is superior to XRT alone for preventing IBTR. The findings demonstrate that chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy is effective for the management of women with negative axillary lymph nodes and either ER-negative or ER-positive tumors. Because it also has been proven effective in women with tumors less than or equal to 1 cm, such therapy might also be considered in the treatment of that patient population.     

美国乳腺与肠道外科辅助治疗研究组结直肠癌临床试验研究进展

美国乳腺与肠道外科辅助治疗研究组由美国国家癌症研究中心资助,主要进行大规模乳腺癌和结直肠癌临床试验.其临床试验为乳腺癌以及结直肠癌的治疗提供了重要的参考和指导价值.近5年来,NSABP结直肠癌临床试验就新的辅助化疗方案、靶向药物的作用以及直肠癌的新辅助治疗和辅助治疗的作用进行了深入的研究,取得了一些新的进展.     

Outcomes among African-Americans and Caucasians in colon cancer adjuvant therapy trials: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project

BACKGROUND: African-Americans generally have lower survival rates from colon cancer than Caucasian Americans. This disparity has been attributed to many sources, including diagnosis at later disease stage and other unfavorable disease features, inadequate treatment, and socioeconomic factors. The randomized clinical trial setting ensures similarity in disease stage and a uniform treatment plan between blacks and whites. In this study, we evaluated survival and related end points for African-American and Caucasian patients with colon cancer participating in randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) to determine whether outcomes were less favorable for African-Americans. METHODS: The study included African-American (n = 663) or Caucasian (n = 5969) patients from five serially conducted, randomized clinical trials of the NSABP. We compared recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival (recurrence, new primary cancer, or death), and survival (death from any cause) between blacks and whites by using statistical modeling to account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between the groups. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Dukes' stage and number of positive lymph nodes were remarkably similar between African-American and Caucasian patients in each trial. Over all trials combined, an 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -6% to 25%; P =.27) excess risk of colon cancer recurrence that was not statistically significant was observed for blacks. A greater disparity in survival was seen, with blacks experiencing a statistically significant 21% (95% CI = 6%-37%; P =.004) greater risk of death. Treatment efficacy appeared similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: While the overall survival prognosis was less favorable for African-Americans compared with Caucasians in these trials, other outcomes measured were considerably more similar than those seen in the population at large, suggesting that earlier detection and adjuvant therapy could appreciably improve colon cancer prognosis for African-Americans. Continued investigations into causes of the deficits noted are warranted.     

HER2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15

BACKGROUND: Recent retrospective analyses have suggested that breast cancer patients whose tumors overexpress HER2 derive preferential benefit from treatment with anthracyclines such as doxorubicin. This has led some clinicians to propose that HER2 should be used as a predictive marker in choosing between anthracycline-based regimens and combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). We evaluated this recommendation in a retrospective study of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15, in which patients received a combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), CMF, or AC followed by CMF. We hypothesized that AC would be superior to CMF only in the HER2-positive patients. METHODS: Immunohistochemical detection of HER2 was performed on tumor sections from 2034 of 2295 eligible patients. We used statistical analysis to evaluate the interaction between the efficacy of the assigned treatments and HER2 overexpression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Tumor sections from 599 patients (29%) stained positive for HER2. AC was superior to CMF in HER2-positive patients only, although differences in outcomes did not reach statistical significance. In the HER2-positive cohort, relative risks of failure (i.e., after AC treatment as compared with CMF treatment) were 0.84 for disease-free survival (DFS) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.65--1.07; P =.15), 0.82 for survival (95% CI = 0.63--1.06; P =.14), and 0.80 for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (95% CI = 0.62--1.04; P =.10). Tests for interaction between treatment and HER2 status were suggestive but not statistically significant (P =.19 for DFS, P =.11 for survival, and P =.08 for RFS). CONCLUSIONS: These results, together with overview results indicating minor overall superiority for anthracycline-based regimens relative to CMF, indicate a preference for the AC regimen in patients with HER2-positive tumors. Both AC and CMF regimens may be considered for patients with HER2-negative tumors.     

Prognostic value of thymidylate synthase, Ki-67, and p53 in patients with Dukes' B and C colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project collaborative study.

PURPOSE: To define the value of thymidylate synthase (TS), Ki-67, and p53 as prognostic markers in patients with stage II and III colon carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic value of TS, Ki-67, and p53 in 706 patients with Dukes' B (291 patients) or Dukes' C (415 patients) colon carcinoma who were treated with either surgery alone (275 patients) or surgery plus fluorouracil (FU)-leucovorin chemotherapy (431 patients) in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocols C01-C04. All three markers were assayed using immunohistochemical techniques. RESULTS: Using 5 years of follow-up data, our retrospective analysis demonstrated an association between TS intensity (relapse-free survival [RFS]: risk ratio [RR] = 1.46, P =.01; overall survival [OS]: RR = 1.54, P =.002), Ki-67 (RFS: RR = 0.76, P =.05; OS: RR = 0.62, P =.001), and p53 (RFS: RR = 1.49, P =.01; OS: RR = 1.21, P =.18) for RFS and OS. High TS intensity levels and positive p53 staining were associated with a worse outcome. Tumors containing a high percentage of Ki-67-positive cells enjoyed an improved outcome compared with those patients whose tumors contained relatively few positive cells. An interaction with treatment was not identified for any of the markers. CONCLUSION: This retrospective investigation demonstrated that TS, Ki-67, and p53 staining each had significant prognostic value for patients with Dukes' B and C colon carcinoma. However, none of the markers could be used to clearly discern groups of individuals who would be predicted to derive greater or lesser benefit from the use of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

美国乳腺与肠道外科辅助治疗研究组（NSABP）乳腺癌临床试验进展

美国乳腺与肠道外科辅助治疗研究组（National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project,简称NSABP）是一个进行大规模乳腺癌和结,直肠癌临床试验的合作团体,本文就NSABP有关乳腺癌的临床试验作一综述。     

Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02

BACKGROUND: The conviction that postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy represent an acceptable standard of care for patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the rectum evolved in the absence of data from clinical trials designed to determine whether the addition of radiotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival. This study was carried out to address this issue. An additional aim was to determine whether leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is superior to the combination of 5-FU, semustine, and vincristine (MOF) in men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 694) with Dukes' B or C carcinoma of the rectum were enrolled in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol R-02 from September 1987 through December 1992 and were followed. They were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone (n = 348) or chemotherapy with postoperative radiotherapy (n = 346). All female patients (n = 287) received 5-FU plus LV chemotherapy; male patients received either MOF (n = 207) or 5-FU plus LV (n = 200). Primary analyses were carried out by use of a stratified log-rank statistic; P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The average time on study for surviving patients is 93 months as of September 30, 1998. Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in no beneficial effect on disease-free survival (P =.90) or overall survival (P =.89), regardless of which chemotherapy was utilized, although it reduced the cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse from 13% to 8% at 5-year follow-up (P =.02). Male patients who received 5-FU plus LV demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival at 5 years compared with those who received MOF (55% versus 47%; P =.009) but not in 5-year overall survival (65% versus 62%; P =.17). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of postoperative radiation therapy to chemotherapy in Dukes' B and C rectal cancer did not alter the subsequent incidence of distant disease, although there was a reduction in locoregional relapse when compared with chemotherapy alone.     

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or BCG for colon cancer: results from NSABP protocol C-01

Data are presented from 1,166 patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who were entered into the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol C-01 between November 1977 and February 1983. Patients were randomized to one of three therapeutic categories: 1) no further treatment following curative resection (394 patients); 2) postoperative chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, semustine, and vincristine (379 patients); or 3) postoperative BCG (393 patients). The average time on study was 77.3 months. A comparison between patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and those treated with surgery alone indicated that there was an overall improvement in disease-free survival (P = .02) and survival (P = .05) in favor of the chemotherapy-treated group. At 5 years of follow-up, patients treated with surgery alone were at 1.29 times the risk of developing a treatment failure and at 1.31 times the likelihood of dying as were similar patients treated with combination adjuvant chemotherapy. Comparison of the BCG-treated group with the group treated with surgery alone indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (P = .09). There was, however, a survival advantage in favor of the BCG-treated group (P = .03). At 5 years of follow-up, patients randomized to the surgery-alone arm were at 1.28 times the risk of dying as were similar patients treated with BCG. Further investigation disclosed that this survival advantage in favor of BCG was a result of a diminution in deaths that were non-cancer related. When analyses were conducted on which events not related to cancer recurrence were eliminated, the survival difference between the BCG and control groups became nonsignificant (P = .40); the cumulative odds at 5 years decreased from 1.28 to 1.10. The findings from this study are the first from a randomized prospective clinical trial to demonstrate that a significant disease-free survival and survival benefit can be achieved with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who have undergone curative resection.     

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18 was initiated in 1988 to determine whether four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide given preoperatively improve survival and disease-free survival (DFS) when compared with the same chemotherapy given postoperatively. Secondary aims included the evaluation of preoperative chemotherapy in downstaging the primary breast tumor and involved axillary lymph nodes, the comparison of lumpectomy rates and rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in the two treatment groups, and the assessment of the correlation between primary tumor response and outcome. Initially published findings were based on a follow-up of 5 years; this report updates results through 9 years of follow-up. There continue to be no statistically significant overall differences in survival or DFS between the two treatment groups. Survival at 9 years is 70% in the postoperative group and 69% in the preoperative group (P =.80). DFS is 53% in postoperative patients and 55% in preoperative patients (P =.50). A statistically significant correlation persists between primary tumor response and outcome, and this correlation has become statistically stronger with longer follow-up. Patients assigned to preoperative chemotherapy received notably more lumpectomies than postoperative patients, especially among patients with tumors greater than 5 cm at study entry. Although the rate of IBTR was slightly higher in the preoperative group (10.7% versus 7.6%), this difference was not statistically significant. Marginally statistically significant treatment-by-age interactions appear to be emerging for survival and DFS, suggesting that younger patients may benefit from preoperative therapy, whereas the reverse may be true for older patients.     

Systemic adjuvant therapy in treatment of primary operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience

This report provides an overview of information presented by us at a recent National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Adjuvant Chemotherapy. The data, derived from 7 randomized clinical trials conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) since 1958, permit us to conclude that the use of systemic adjuvant therapy is of benefit in both premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer. Data from the first NSABP trial begun in 1958 with short-course perioperative thiotepa demonstrated a long-term survival benefit in premenopausal but not postmenopausal patients. Ten-year findings from a second trial evaluating response to melphalan (P) implemented in 1972 indicated that, when related to age and nodes, there was a benefit from this drug in both the 1-3 and greater than or equal to 4 positive node premenopausal groups but those with fewer nodes were most improved. In this group characterized by premenopausal women with 1-3 positive nodes, mortality was reduced 64% with a cumulative odds ratio of 3.25 (P = .009) at 10 years after surgery. When related to nuclear grade, there was a striking benefit in survival from P in patients less than or equal to 49 and greater than or equal to 50 years with undifferentiated tumors. The addition of 5-fluorouracil (F) to melphalan (PF) resulted in an increase in disease-free survival and survival over that observed with P in patients less than or equal to 49 and greater than or equal to 50 years of age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

PURPOSE: Experience with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is limited. We examined the feasibility and accuracy of this procedure within a randomized trial in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the conduct of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial B-27, several participating surgeons attempted SNB before the required axillary dissection in 428 patients. All underwent lymphatic mapping and an attempt to identify and remove a sentinel node. Lymphatic mapping was performed with radioactive colloid (14.7%), with lymphazurin blue dye alone (29.9%), or with both (54.7%). RESULTS: Success rate for the identification and removal of a sentinel node was 84.8%. Success rate increased significantly with the use of radioisotope (87.6% to 88.9%) versus with the use of lymphazurin alone (78.1%, P = .03). There were no significant differences in success rate according to clinical tumor size, clinical nodal status, age, or calendar year of random assignment. Of 343 patients who had SNB and axillary dissection, the sentinel nodes were positive in 125 patients and were the only positive nodes in 70 patients (56.0%). Of the 218 patients with negative sentinel nodes, nonsentinel nodes were positive in 15 (false-negative rate, 10.7%; 15 of 140 patients). There were no significant differences in false-negative rate according to clinical patient and tumor characteristics, method of lymphatic mapping, or breast tumor response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: These results are comparable to those obtained from multicenter studies evaluating SNB before systemic therapy and suggest that the sentinel node concept is applicable following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy with and without tamoxifen in the treatment of primary breast cancer: 5-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Trial

In this National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) clinical trial, 1,891 women with primary operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes were randomized between Jan, 1977 and May 1980 to receive L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) either with or without tamoxifen (TAM)-PFT. This report presents life table probabilities, cumulative odds ratios, and P values for disease-free survival (DFS) and survival at yearly intervals through 5 years of observation (mean time on study, 72 months). When patients were examined overall without regard for any discriminant associated with outcome, ie, age, number of positive nodes, or tumor receptor status, there was a significant prolongation of DFS (P = .002), but not survival through the fifth postoperative year. The benefit was almost entirely restricted to those greater than or equal to 50 years with greater than or equal to 4 positive nodes. In that group there was a 66% greater chance of remaining disease free if PFT was received (P less than .001), and there was also a significant survival benefit (P = .02). The advantage from PFT was found to be associated with tumor estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) as well as patient age and nodal status. Overall there was a significant improvement in DFS from PFT in those having tumors with an ER or PR level greater than or equal to 10 femtomole (fmol) (P = .01 and .009, respectively). No significant benefit in DFS or survival has been observed in patients less than or equal to 49 years old related either to nodes or tumor receptor status. Survival continues to be adversely affected by TAM in those patients (less than or equal to 49 years old), particularly when their tumors have a PR of 0 to 9 fmol (P = .007). In patients greater than or equal to 50 years old with four or more positive nodes, a significant DFS benefit persisted through the fifth year of observation in those having tumor ER or PR levels greater than 10 fmol (P less than .001 and .002). The advantage was observed in patients 50 to 59 years old as well as those 60 to 70. Women in the older decade demonstrated some advantage from PFT when their tumor ER or PR was 0 to 9 fmol. The most likely explanation for this finding is analytical error in receptor analyses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Prognostic factors in NSABP studies of women with node-negative breast cancer. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project.

Twenty-two pathologic (including estrogen and progesterone receptor status) and four clinical features of 950 node-negative stage I invasive breast cancers from 950 women enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-06 were analyzed for their possible prognostic significance. Univariate analyses revealed 10 characteristics that were significant at the 1% level. Only three of these--notably nuclear grade, histologic tumor type, and race--were found to be significant when entered into a Cox regression model. Patients whose tumors exhibited a good nuclear grade fared significantly better than those whose tumors were scored as poor. Similarly, a significantly better prognosis was noted when the histologic type of cancer was found to be "favorable" (mucinous, tubular, or papillary) than when it was "intermediate" (NOS, "Not Otherwise Specified," combination; typical medullary; and lobular invasive) or "unfavorable" (NOS pure and atypical medullary). Blacks exhibited a worse prognosis than whites. Survival was 94% at 8 years when the nuclear grade was good and the tumor type favorable, but only 54% when the nuclear grade was poor and tumor type unfavorable. Patients with one favorable and one unfavorable feature exhibited an intermediate survival. A brief overview as well as our own preliminary experience indicates that the combined use of these two prognostic pathologic parameters may be as good as and in some instances a better predictor of survival in node-negative patients than information derived from more "objective" methodologies such as flow cytometry, receptor analyses and tumor labeling indices or the demonstration of oncogene overexpression. Assessment of the pathologic parameters is simple, universally available, and quick and requires only modest training to be reproducible.     

Highlights from recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project studies in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Findings from major National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project studies in women with breast cancer and negative axillary nodes are reported and discussed. Results of the B-13 and B-19 studies demonstrated that systemic chemotherapy (either with methotrexate and sequentially administered fluorouracil followed by leucovorin, or with cyclophosphamide plus methotrexate and fluorouracil) increased overall disease-free survival in women 49 years of age or younger, as well as in those 50 years old or older. Women older than 50 also experienced a survival advantage with chemotherapy. Moreover, women who received systemic chemotherapy after lumpectomy plus radiation therapy were significantly less likely to develop an ipsilateral recurrence of tumor. The B-14 study established the benefit of tamoxifen. When chemotherapy was added to tamoxifen in the B-20 trial, there was an increased benefit. The B-18 trial demonstrated that the outcome of patients who received preoperative chemotherapy was comparable to that of patients who received the same therapy postoperatively. Moreover, results suggested that breast tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlated with outcome. Also, larger tumors were sufficiently downstaged by preoperative chemotherapy to permit lumpectomy rather than mastectomy. The B-17 study in women with ductal carcinoma in situ concluded that radiation therapy should follow lumpectomy in women with localized, mammographically detected lesions. The P-1 Breast Cancer Prevention trial showed that tamoxifen was effective in significantly reducing the incidence of both invasive and noninvasive breast tumors in women at high risk for the disease. Although many questions remain, and a new study, P-2, has been designed to compare tamoxifen and raloxifene, it is appropriate to offer tamoxifen to women who are similar to those in the P-1 study and who may benefit from it.