Effect of cognitive-existential group therapy on survival in early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Cognitive-existential group therapy (CEGT) was developed to improve mood and mental attitude toward cancer in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Given the debate about group therapy's association with increased survival in women with metastatic breast cancer, we were curious to check its effect at a much earlier stage in the cancer journey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 303 women with early-stage breast cancer who were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy to either 20 sessions of weekly group therapy plus three relaxation classes (n = 154) or to a control condition of three relaxation classes alone (n = 149). The primary outcome was survival. RESULTS: CEGT did not extend survival; the median survival time was 81.9 months (95% CI, 64.8 to 99.0 months) in the group-therapy women and 85.5 months (95% CI, 67.5 to 103.6 months) in the control arm. The hazard ratio for death was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.76 to 2.39; P = .31). In contrast, histology and axillary lymph node status were significant predictors of survival. Low-grade histology yielded a hazard ratio of 0.342 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.69), and axillary lymph node-negative status yielded a hazard ratio of 0.397 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.78). CONCLUSION: CEGT does not prolong survival in women with early-stage breast cancer.     

Impact of providing audiotapes of primary adjuvant treatment consultations to women with breast cancer: a multisite, randomized, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Women with breast cancer were provided with an audiotape of their primary adjuvant treatment consultation, and the following patient outcomes were measured at 12 weeks postconsultation: perceived degree of information provision, audiotape satisfaction and use, communication satisfaction with oncologist, mood state, and cancer-specific quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants included 628 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and 40 oncologists from six cancer centers in Canada. The patients were block randomized to one of four consultation groups: standard care control, not audiotaped; audiotaped, no audiotape given; audiotaped, patient given audiotape; and audiotaped, patient offered choice of receiving audiotape or not. RESULTS: Patients receiving the consultation audiotape had significantly better recall of having discussed side effects of treatment than patients who did not receive the audiotape. Audiotape benefit was not significantly related to patient satisfaction with communication, mood state, or quality of life at 12 weeks postconsultation, and was not significantly affected by choice of receiving the audiotape. Patients rated the audiotape intervention positively, with an average score of 83.9 of 100. CONCLUSION: Audiotape provision benefits patients by facilitating their perception of being informed about treatment side effects, but does not significantly influence patient satisfaction with communication, mood state, or quality of life.     

Supportive-expressive group therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: survival and psychosocial outcome from a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Mixed reports exist about the impact of supportive-expressive group therapy (SEGT) on survival. METHODS: From 485 women with advanced breast cancer recruited between 1996-2002, 227 (47%) consented and were randomized within an average 10 months of cancer recurrence in a 2:1 ratio to intervention with 1 year or more of weekly SEGT plus three classes of relaxation therapy (147 women) or to control receiving three classes of relaxation therapy (80 women). The primary outcome was survival; psychosocial well-being was appraised secondarily. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: SEGT did not prolong survival (median survival 24.0 months in SEGT and 18.3 in controls; univariate hazard ratio for death 0.92 [95% CI, 0.69-1.26]; multivariate hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.74-1.51]). Significant predictors of survival were treatment with chemotherapy and hormone therapy (p<0.001), visceral metastases (p<0.001) and advanced disease at first diagnosis (p<0.05). SEGT ameliorated and prevented new DSM-IV depressive disorders (p = 0.002), reduced hopeless-helplessness (p = 0.004), trauma symptoms (p = 0.04) and improved social functioning (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SEGT did not prolong survival. It improved quality of life, including treatment of and protection against depression.     

Individualized survival curves improve satisfaction with cancer risk management decisions in women with BRCA1/2 mutations.

PURPOSE: Women with BRCA1/2 mutations are faced with complex decisions about breast and ovarian cancer risk management. This study was conducted to determine the effect of a tailored decision support system (DSS) that provides individualized survival and cancer incidence curves specific to expected outcomes of alternative management strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 32 women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Primary outcome measures were decision satisfaction, cancer anxiety, perceptions of cancer risk given alternative management strategies, and management decisions. RESULTS: Twenty-seven women completed a 6-week follow-up. Women in the intervention arm (n = 13) reported significantly higher decision satisfaction at follow-up than women in the control arm (n = 14; adjusted mean difference, 9.7; P < .0005). The effect of the DSS was greater among women with low cancer anxiety at baseline than women with high cancer anxiety at baseline (P = .01 for interaction). However, the DSS did not significantly alter cancer anxiety at follow-up, perceptions of cancer risk given alternative management strategies, or management decisions. CONCLUSION: The presentation of individualized survival and incidence curves for alternative management options improves satisfaction about cancer risk management decisions among women with BRCA1/2 mutations without increasing anxiety or changing management decisions. The benefit of the DSS is greatest among women with relatively low cancer-related anxiety at baseline.     

Impact of partial versus whole breast radiation therapy on fatigue, perceived stress, quality of life and natural killer cell activity in women with breast cancer

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This pilot study used a prospective longitudinal design to compare the effect of adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) versus partial breast radiation therapy (PBRT) on fatigue, perceived stress, quality of life and natural killer cell activity (NKCA) in women receiving radiation after breast cancer surgery. METHODS: Women (N = 30) with early-stage breast cancer received either PBRT, Mammosite brachytherapy at dose of 34 Gy 10 fractions/5 days, (N = 15) or WBRT, 3-D conformal techniques at dose of 50 Gy +10 Gy Boost/30 fractions, (N = 15). Treatment was determined by the attending oncologist after discussion with the patient and the choice was based on tumor stage and clinical need. Women were assessed prior to initiation of radiation therapy and twice after completion of radiation therapy. At each assessment, blood was obtained for determination of NKCA and the following instruments were administered: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used to evaluate group differences in initial outcomes and change in outcomes over time. RESULTS: Fatigue (FACT-F) levels, which were similar prior to radiation therapy, demonstrated a significant difference in trajectory. Women who received PBRT reported progressively lower fatigue; conversely fatigue worsened over time for women who received WBRT. No difference in perceived stress was observed between women who received PBRT or WBRT. Both groups of women reported similar levels of quality of life (FACT-G) prior to initiation of radiation therapy. However, HLM analysis revealed significant group differences in the trajectory of quality of life, such that women receiving PBRT exhibited a linear increase in quality of life over time after completion of radiation therapy; whereas women receiving WBRT showed a decreasing trajectory. NKCA was also similar between therapy groups but additional post hoc analysis revealed that better quality of life significantly predicted higher NKCA regardless of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to WBRT, PBRT results in more rapid recovery from cancer-related fatigue with improved restoration of quality of life after radiation therapy. Additionally, better quality of life predicts higher NKCA against tumor targets, emphasizing the importance of fostering quality of life for women undergoing adjuvant radiation therapy.     

A randomised controlled trial of adjuvant hormono-chemotherapy in Stage II breast cancer

From 1979 to 1984 women with histologically proven Stage II breast cancer were entered into a randomised controlled trial of adjuvant hormono-chemotherapy following mastectomy. Adjuvant therapy was started within 2 weeks of surgery and was given for 6 months as continuous 'Tamoxifen' and 6-monthly cycles of vincristine, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (VAC). Of the 157 women randomised 82 were assigned to the control group and 75 to the adjuvant group. Comparing the two groups by life table analysis the rate of recurrence was found to be significantly greater in the control group (n = 46) than in the adjuvant group (n = 25) (Peto log rank test chi 2 = 7.46 P less than 0.01). Although there were more deaths amongst the control patients (n = 31) than in those randomised to receive adjuvant therapy (n = 18), this difference did not achieve statistical significance (chi 2 = 2.80 P less than 0.1). This analysis has shown that although adjuvant hormono-chemotherapy may significantly delay recurrence the trial has failed to demonstrate any significant improvement in the survival of women with Stage II breast cancer following mastectomy.     

Cognitive function in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy have complained of difficulties in their ability to remember, think, and concentrate. This study assessed whether there are differences in cognitive function between breast cancer patients treated with standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy compared with healthy controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) were used to assess cognitive function and mood in a group of 107 women. The women consisted of 31 breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (group A), 40 breast cancer patients who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy a median of 2 years earlier (group B), and 36 healthy controls (group C). RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences (P =.009) in overall cognitive function scores between groups A and C, with poorer function in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. These differences remained significant (P =.046) when controlling for age, education level, and menopausal status. More patients had moderate or severe cognitive impairment in groups A and B than in controls (P 相似文献   

Telephone therapy for patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To test the value of telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy in a study of patients with breast cancer. DESIGN: Women were assigned randomly to a therapy group or an assessment-only control group. SETTING: A tertiary cancer treatment center serving rural areas of North Dakota and Minnesota. SAMPLE: Women were recruited within three to four months of stage I (n = 27) or stage II (n = 26) breast cancer diagnosis. Age ranged from 30-82 (mean = 51.5 years). Most participants (n = 35) underwent a modified radical mastectomy; 17 underwent a lumpectomy. METHODS: Therapy involved 10 30-minute (or less) telephone sessions. Data that were collected from mailed questionnaires included psychological distress (Profile of Mood States), perceived stress, coping (Coping Response Indices-Revised), quality of life (Medical Outcome Scale), and satisfaction with therapy. Measures were completed at baseline and at 4- and 10-month follow-up intervals. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Telephone therapy, stress, coping, and quality of life. FINDINGS: With time, women in the therapy and control groups reported reduced stress and improved quality of life. However, significant reductions in some kinds of distress (anxiety, anger, depression, and confusion) were not observed. Most therapy participants liked the telephone treatment sessions but showed only modest improvement (less anxiety and confusion) compared with women in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients reported being comfortable with the telephone therapy and said that they felt better as a result of it. However, the outcome data showed that telephone therapy--as carried out in this study--produced only modest benefits. Researchers need to consider who is best for delivering such therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Providing telephone therapy to patients with breast cancer has potential benefits, and nurses may be the appropriate professionals to administer the therapy.     

Does hormone therapy for the treatment of breast cancer have a detrimental effect on memory and cognition? A pilot study

This pilot study examines whether hormone therapy for breast cancer affects cognition. Patients participating in a randomised trial of anastrozole, tamoxifen alone or combined (ATAC) (n=94) and a group of women without breast cancer (n=35) completed a battery of neuropsychological measures. Compared with the control group, the patients were impaired on a processing speed task (p=0.032) and on a measure of immediate verbal memory (p=0.026) after controlling for the use of hormone replacement therapy in both groups. Patient group performance was not significantly related to length of treatment or measures of psychological morbidity. The results showed specific impairments in processing speed and verbal memory in women receiving hormonal therapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Verbal memory may be especially sensitive to changes in oestrogen levels, a finding commonly reported in studies of hormone replacement therapy in healthy women. In view of the increased use of hormone therapies in an adjuvant and preventative setting their impact on cognitive functioning should be investigated more thoroughly.     

Exploring knowledge,attitudes and experience of genitourinary symptoms in women with early breast cancer on adjuvant endocrine therapy

Clinical trials of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with early breast cancer have consistently reported that genitourinary symptoms are common. However, little is known about women's experiences of genitourinary symptoms, their views about the symptoms and how they impact on their lives. The aim of this study was to explore knowledge, attitudes and experiences of genitourinary symptoms among women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer. Thirty‐two semi‐structured interviews were conducted and subjected to a rigorous qualitative analysis. Genitourinary symptoms were commonly reported to negatively impact on personal, social and physical activities, were often attributed to anxiety and stress and were a source of embarrassment. Women also commented on the limited information available or provided regarding the potential genitourinary adverse effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy. There was a general lack of awareness that their symptoms could be associated with or exacerbated by adjuvant endocrine therapy. Women indicated a preference to receive information and advice about potential management options from either their general practitioner or specialist. These findings underscore the importance of improving communication and increasing awareness among both clinicians and patients about the potential impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on genitourinary symptoms.     

p53 immunohistochemical staining and survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

We have investigated the relationship between immunohistochemically determined p53 status and outcome in 277 women with node-positive primary breast cancer who, following tumour excision and axillary clearance, were randomised to receive either 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) (n = 130) or no such post-operative treatment (n = 147). Follow-up data (median = 9 years) were available on all patients. A significant association was found between p53 status and survival. Patients with p53-positive tumours had a less favourable outcome than those with p53-negative disease. Women receiving adjuvant CMF chemotherapy had a significantly more favourable outcome compared to those who did not. The effect was seen both in women with p53-positive and p53-negative tumours; multivariate analysis showed relative risks for overall survival attributable to chemotherapy of 2.3 (95% CI 1.2–4.3) for women with p53-positive tumours and of 2.1 (95% CI 1.4–3.0) for those with p53-negative tumours. Thus, adjuvant chemotherapy with CMF is associated with a survival benefit in women with node-positive breast cancer irrespective of immunohistochemically determined p53 status. Int. J. Cancer 74:605–608, 1997.© 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Anxiety and distress following receipt of results from routine HPV primary testing in cervical screening: The psychological impact of primary screening (PIPS) study

We used a cross-sectional survey to examine short-term anxiety and distress in women receiving different results following routine human papillomavirus (HPV) primary testing at cervical screening. Participants were women aged 24–65 (n = 1,127) who had attended screening at one of five sites piloting HPV primary screening in England, including a control group with normal cytology who were not tested for HPV. Women completed a postal questionnaire ~2 weeks after receiving their screening result. Unadjusted mean anxiety scores ranged from 32.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 12.2) in HPV-negative women to 42.1 (SD = 14.9) in women who were HPV-positive with abnormal cytology. In adjusted analyses, anxiety was significantly higher in women testing HPV-positive with either normal cytology (mean difference [MD] = 3.5, CI: 0.6–6.4) or abnormal cytology (MD = 7.2, CI: 3.7–10.6), than the control group. Distress was slightly higher in women who tested HPV-positive with abnormal cytology (MD = 0.9, CI: 0.02–1.8), than the control group. We also found increased odds of very high anxiety in women who tested HPV-positive with normal or abnormal cytology compared to the control group. This pattern of results was only observed among women receiving their first HPV-positive result, not among women found to have persistent HPV at 12-month follow-up. Testing HPV-positive with normal cytology for the first time, is associated with elevated anxiety despite carrying very low immediate cervical cancer risk. However, receiving the same test result at 12-month early recall does not appear to be associated with higher anxiety, suggesting anxiety may normalise with repeated exposure and/or over time.     

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with invasive ductal versus lobular breast cancer

BackgroundOn the basis of the lack of response of invasive lobular breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we questioned the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in relation to histology.Patients and methodsWomen with primary nonmetastatic invasive ductal or (mixed type) lobular breast cancer, aged 50–70 years, diagnosed between 1995 and 2008, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and followed until January 1, 2010. The patients were divided in two groups: one group receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy only and the other receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy.ResultsIn total, 19 609 patients had ductal cancer and 3685 had lobular cancer. The 10-year overall survival rate in ductal cancer when treated with hormonal therapy alone was 69%, compared with 74% with the combination therapy (P < 0.0001). In lobular cancer, 10-year survival rates were 68% after hormonal treatment alone and 66% after the combination therapy (P = 0.45). The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in ductal cancer after combination therapy was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–0.76; P < 0.0001], compared with hormonal treatment alone. The HR in lobular cancer was 1.00 (95% CI 0.82–1.21; P = 0.97).ConclusionAdjuvant chemotherapy seems to confer no additional beneficial effects in postmenopausal patients with pure or mixed type lobular breast cancer receiving hormonal therapy.     

Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?

Women with a breast cancer diagnosis often are given a choice between breast conservation or mastectomy as the primary treatment for their cancer. Despite the high frequency of this cancer, there is little systemic information about the effect of surgical treatment on the quality of life or psychological adjustment of the patient. In this study, the authors prospectively evaluated quality of life, performance status, and psychological adjustment in 109 women who had primary breast cancer treatment. During the year of follow-up, no statistically significant differences in quality of life, mood disturbance, performance status, or global adjustment were found between the two surgical groups, and both groups of patients improved significantly during the year of observation (P = 0.0001). As was predicted, patients receiving mastectomy reported more difficulties with clothing and body image; however, these results apparently did not affect the assessment of mood or quality of life. The authors conclude that patients receiving breast conservation therapy do not experience significantly better quality of life or mood than patients having mastectomy; however, patients having breast conservation surgery have fewer problems with clothing and body image. Women receiving breast conservation therapy may require more intensive psychosocial intervention in the postoperative period because of the added burden of primary radiation therapy.     

Adjuvant goserelin in pre-menopausal patients with early breast cancer: Results from the ZIPP study

The Zoladex In Pre-menopausal Patients (ZIPP) study was designed to determine whether addition of goserelin ('Zoladex') and/or tamoxifen to adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy), provided benefit to pre- or peri-menopausal women with operable, early breast cancer. A combined analysis of four randomised trials using a core protocol was performed. Patients (n = 2710) were randomised into a 2 x 2 factorial trial based on goserelin and tamoxifen (n = 1800) or randomised to receive goserelin or not (n = 910; some received elective tamoxifen) for 2 years. The analysis presented here compares women who did (n = 1354) or did not (n = 1356) receive goserelin. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, goserelin provided a significant benefit for event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69, 0.92; P = 0.002) and overall survival (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67, 0.99; P = 0.038). Goserelin was well tolerated. These data show that the addition of goserelin to standard adjuvant therapy is more effective than standard therapy alone in pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer.     

Psychological aspects of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer presents a range of physical and psychological symptoms during stages of diagnosis, treatment, and survival. Women at risk for ovarian cancer who attend screening programs are vulnerable to high levels of depression and anxiety, particularly young women with poor social support. Multiple physiological stressors of surgical menopause, steroid therapy, and pain present during active treatment that place women at high risk of depression and anxiety during this time. Symptoms of anxiety and depression are also prevalent immediately after chemotherapy and during palliative care. Screening for psychological distress may be useful to identify women who will benefit from psychological counseling. They should be referred to a mental health professional affiliated with the hospital at which they are receiving oncology services. Brief group or individual supportive psychotherapies are effective in relieving psychological distress. Face-to-face psychological intervention should be tailored to the patient's degree of physical mobility. Pain, discomfort, and severe mood symptoms should be addressed pharmacologically, when possible, by a psychiatric consultant knowledgeable in oncology psychiatry. Survivors experience chronic fear of recurrence, sexual dysfunction, and identity disturbance. Reports that ovarian cancer can result in positive life changes, such as closer interpersonal relationships, are encouraging and may provide hope to patients who become despairing about the future.     

Discrepancy between preference and actual adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

PurposePretreatment preferences for adjuvant therapy were examined and compared with actual treatment received.Patients and MethodsBefore definitive surgery, women with node-negative breast cancer were asked to indicate their preference for adjuvant therapy in response to 3 different clinical scenarios. The scenarios provided precise risk, benefit, and side effect information with low-, moderate-, or high-risk risk of death from breast cancer. Contingency table and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to examine associations. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used for group comparisons, with the Friedman rank sum test being used for correlated samples.ResultsA total of 75 women enrolled between February 2002 and April 2005; 24% were aged > 65 years. After definitive surgery, 21% of women had ductal carcinoma in situ, and 89% had receptor-positive disease. There was a significant correlation between risk of recurrence and aggressiveness of treatment preferred (P < .001). After surgical staging, the high-risk group received more aggressive treatment compared with the low-risk group (P = .004). In the 51 women with invasive receptor-positive tumors, there was a significant difference (P = .002) in aggressiveness of treatment received based on risk of recurrence. Only 45% of the women received what they had preferred for the level of their risk before surgery. Women were more likely to receive a less aggressive therapy than they preferred initially (P = .0002).ConclusionThis study is among the first to correlate pretreatment preference for therapy with the actual therapy received. Less than half of women received their indicated preference before definitive surgery, with most women receiving less aggressive therapy. Future studies will need to examine this discrepancy.     

Beyond tamoxifen: extended and late extended endocrine therapy in postmenopausal early breast cancer

Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. The majority of cases are oestrogen receptor- or progesterone receptor-positive and, therefore, potentially sensitive to endocrine therapy. A significant risk of recurrence and death persists following initial diagnosis, with over one half of all recurrences and two thirds of breast cancer-related deaths reported to occur following completion of standard adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. There is a need for effective protection against recurrence beyond the initial 5 years of adjuvant treatment for women with hormone-responsive cancer. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole following completion of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment is well tolerated and reduces recurrence risk by 42% and the risk of developing distant metastases by 40% when compared with placebo. Extended adjuvant letrozole therapy confers protection against late relapses and should be considered for women completing adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The MA.17 trial was unblinded early because of a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival with letrozole, and patients receiving placebo were allowed to receive letrozole. MA.17 post-unblinding results show that women originally randomised to placebo who then chose to receive letrozole at the time of trial unblinding experienced a significant improvement in all outcomes (disease-free survival and distant disease-free survival), including a significant survival advantage when compared with women in the placebo arm who chose to continue with no further treatment. Physicians should consider late extended adjuvant therapy for women who have been off tamoxifen for some time, as it may offer benefit in outcomes, and this option should be discussed.     

Cognitive impairment associated with adjuvant therapy in breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine whether cognitive function changes over time in women with breast cancer who received adjuvant therapy as compared to women with breast cancer who received no adjuvant therapy. Three groups of women (n = 46) were studied; groups 1 and 2 consisted of women with stage I or II breast cancer. Group 1 received chemotherapy and group 2 received chemotherapy plus tamoxifen. Group 3 consisted of women with ductal carcinoma in situ who received no chemotherapy or tamoxifen. Cognitive function was evaluated at three timepoints. Time 1 occurred after surgery and before chemotherapy initiation in groups 1 and 2. Time 1 for group 3 occurred post-surgery. Time 2 occurred within 1 week after the conclusion of chemotherapy for groups 1 and 2 and at a comparable time for group 3. Time 3 occurred 1 year after Time 2. Women who received chemotherapy plus tamoxifen exhibited deterioration on measures of visual memory and verbal working memory and reported more memory complaints. Women who received chemotherapy alone also exhibited deteriorations in verbal working memory. Conversely, cognitive function scores improved in women who received no therapy, indicating practice effects. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer can be associated with deteriorations in memory and this may persist over time. The addition of tamoxifen may lead to more widespread memory deficits.