Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition: morphologic characterization

Incomplete stent apposition (ISA) is a lack of contact between stents and the underlying vessel wall, best described by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Late acquired incomplete apposition, defined as complete stent apposition at the time of procedure but ISA at follow-up, is an unusual IVUS finding reported in intracoronary brachytherapy, bare-metal stent (BMS), and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Late-acquired ISA is observed relatively more frequently with DES implantation compared with BMS implantation. Possible mechanisms of this phenomenon include focal/extensive vascular remodeling and dissolution of thrombus. While there are conflicting reports regarding the possible impact of this IVUS finding on clinical outcomes, recent reports of DES have suggested its possible association with late adverse cardiac events including late stent thrombosis. In this paper, we review the incidence, location, underlying pathology, and possible clinical sequelae of late-acquired ISA, primarily focusing on that of DES.     

Late incomplete apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence and potential for adverse clinical outcomes.

AIM: Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) has been documented after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation; however, its clinical role remains controversial. We sought to investigate the incidence and long-term clinical consequences of late ISA after implantation of sirolimus- (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in a non-selected population. METHODS AND RESULTS: From our database, we analysed 195 consecutive patients who underwent DES placement (175 with SES and 20 with PES) into native artery lesions and had serial intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS) performed at index procedure and after 6-8 months. They were clinically followed for 29 +/- 15 months (median of 24.3 months, interquartile range 18.1-31.6 months). Late ISA was defined as separation of at least one stent strut from the vessel wall in a segment without a side-branch and where the immediate post-implantation IVUS revealed complete apposition of stent struts. We identified 10 patients (5.1%) with late ISA, three patients after PES, and seven patients after SES implantation. ISA was localized almost exclusively at body of the stents (nine out of 10 cases). Mean ISA volume and length were 44.5 +/- 41.9 mm(3) and 7.4 +/- 11 mm, respectively. There was a marked increase in vessel volume from 416.0 +/- 163.9 mm(3) at baseline to 514.4 +/- 247.9 mm(3) at follow-up (P = 0.001) with no significant change in plaque volume (232.4 +/- 52.7 at baseline and 226.4 +/- 22.3 mm(3) at follow-up, P = 0.3) in patients who presented with late-acquired ISA. During the follow-up period, one patient with SES and one patient with PES who presented late-acquired ISA had late stent thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Late-acquired ISA was observed in 5.1% of patients after DES implantation and is related to regional vessel positive remodelling. The relationship between late-acquired ISA and long-term adverse outcomes (e.g. stent thrombosis) requires further analysis.     

Frequency and characteristics of incomplete stent apposition during and after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

OBJECTIVES: Incomplete stent apposition (ISA) is frequently observed after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. This study investigated the incidence, morphological features, and possible mechanisms of this phenomenon. METHODS: Fifty-two lesions in 47 eligible patients were treated with SES and serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment at the time of post-intervention and 8-month follow-up. ISA was carefully identified from the IVUS images of these lesions. Specifically, quantitative two dimensional IVUS analysis was performed if the lesions demonstrated ISA, including routine IVUS parameters as well as other measurements related to ISA. RESULTS: Overall, ISA was observed in 13 lesions (25.0%) at follow-up. Persistent ISA (n = 6, 11.5%), defined as ISA consistently observed both at post-intervention and follow-up, and late-acquired ISA (n = 7, 13.5%)were systematically compared. Eighty-three percent of cases of persistent ISA were located around the stent edges, whereas all cases of late-acquired ISA were in the stent body. In the persistent ISA group, no serial changes were observed in the lumen area or external elastic membrane area (EEMA) from post-intervention to follow-up. However, in the late-acquired ISA group, EEMA and lumen area significantly increased from post-intervention to follow-up (EEMA: 13.4 +/- 3.2 vs 17.6 +/- 3.3 mm2, respectively, p < 0.0001 ; lumen area: 6.7 +/- 1.4 vs 9.2 +/- 1.8 mm2, respectively, p = 0.004). No adverse clinical events were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: ISA was frequently observed during and after SES implantation in clinical practice. No clinical disadvantages were observed during 16 month clinical follow-up periods. Positive remodeling may potentially cause late-acquired ISA.     

Effect of the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent on vascular tissue responses: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound integrated analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials.

AIMS: The TAXUS Express stent has been shown to reduce angiographic restenosis, repeat revascularizations, and neointimal hyperplasia when compared with bare metal stent (BMS) control (TAXUS IV, V, and VI) in individual TAXUS trials. Since intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) methodology and core laboratory were consistent among all three TAXUS trials, an integrated analysis of 956 patients across all IVUS cohorts can be performed providing superior power. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the TAXUS randomized trials, patients received an Express BMS or paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent. Volumetric analysis was performed on a selected subgroup at implantation and 9 months. Compared with BMS control, TAXUS increased 9-month lumen volumes (144 +/- 79 vs. 179 +/- 95 mm(3); P < 0.0001) due to reduced neointimal volume (66 +/- 49 vs. 27 +/- 30 mm(3); P < 0.0001). This corresponded to a 61% decrease in net lumen volume obstruction (31 +/- 15 vs. 12 +/- 12 mm(3); P < 0.0001). Lumen loss was similar between groups for the proximal 5 mm outside the stent but was reduced in TAXUS at the distal edge (P = 0.0056). Neointimal hyperplasia was significantly reduced in the double-strut region of overlapping TAXUS vs. BMS control and in high-risk patients with diabetes, long lesions, multiple stents, and multiple overlapping stents. Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) was more common with moderate-release TAXUS stents. Importantly, there were no major adverse cardiac events or stent thromboses in any late-acquired ISA patient through 2 years. Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed that longer lesion length and previous myocardial infarction are risk factors for late-acquired ISA. CONCLUSION: Integrated analysis of the TAXUS trials shows that the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent effectively inhibits in-stent neointimal proliferation, even in high-risk and overlapping stent patients.     

Single-center randomized evaluation of paclitaxel-eluting versus conventional stent in acute myocardial infarction (SELECTION)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the superiority of the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in reducing neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) over its corresponding bare metal stent (BMS) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Primary PCI with stent implantation is the repercussion strategy of choice for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); nonetheless restenosis rate is still high. Drug-eluting stents have been proven to reduce restenosis rate in many settings, but their use during primary PCI is still controversial. METHODS: Consecutive patients with STEMI <12 hours were randomized to receive PES or BMS. The primary end-point was the percentage of the stent volume obstructed by neointimal proliferation (NIH) measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at a 7-month angiographic follow-up. Secondary end-points were binary restenosis rate and major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e., death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization). RESULTS: Eighty patients with STEMI were randomized into the PES or BMS group. Patients were well matched for baseline characteristics and the index procedure was always successful. In-hospital and 1-month MACE were 2.5% per group. NIH at 7 months was 4.6% versus 20% (P< 0.01), late lumen loss 0.1 versus 1.01 mm (P = 0.01). MACE were 7.5% versus 42.5% (P = 0.001) with no difference in death and recurrent myocardial infarction rates. Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) rate was 5.1% versus 2.7% (P = 0.65). One subacute stent thrombosis was reported in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PES was superior to its corresponding BMS in reducing NIH in the STEMI setting without any increase in early and long-term clinical adverse events.     

Vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in diabetic patients: three-dimensional ultrasound results of the Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: A predefined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy was performed to evaluate the vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS). BACKGROUND: The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the SES compared with BMS in diabetic patients. METHODS: Serial intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed in 140 lesions (SES = 75; BMS = 65) immediately after stent implantation and at nine-month follow-up. Vessel, luminal, and stent mean areas and volumes were evaluated at both edges and within the stented segment. Qualitative assessment of residual dissections and stent apposition were also performed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 9 months, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) mean area and volume were significantly reduced in the SES group (median NIH area 0.01 mm2 [0.0 to 0.1] vs. 2.0 mm2 [1.0 to 2.9] and median NIH volume 0.11 mm3 [0 to 2.1] vs. 35.3 mm3 [16.6 to 62.6]; both p < 0.0001). In the SES group, stent edges evidenced significant increase in lumen dimensions mainly due to significant increase in vessel volume, whereas those of the BMS group presented vessel shrinkage leading to significant lumen reduction. Late acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 11 lesions (14.7%) in the SES group and 0 in the BMS group (p = 0.001). At one year, no stent thromboses occurred in malapposed stents. CONCLUSIONS: The SES implantation effectively inhibits NIH in diabetic patients. The antirestenotic effect of SES is also appreciated at the stent edges. Late acquired stent malapposition is a frequent phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with SES.     

Characterization of plaque prolapse after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients: a three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound outcome study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to evaluate the plaque prolapse (PP) phenomenon after bare-metal (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus using 3-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). BACKGROUND: Plaque prolapse has been observed in up to 22% of patients treated with BMS. Diabetic patients have a larger atherothrombotic burden and may be more prone to have PP. However, the incidence of PP and its clinical impact after DES implantation is unknown. METHODS: Three-dimensional IVUS was performed after intervention and at 9-month follow-up in 168 patients with diabetes (205 lesions) treated with bare BX Velocity stents ((BX Velocity/Sonic, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson) (BMS, n = 65), sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher, Cordis) (SES, n = 69), and paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) (PES, n = 71). Intravascular ultrasound data at the sites of PP were compared with stented segments without PP in each lesion. Outcomes were evaluated at 9- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were 42 sites of PP (BMS = 11, SES = 11, PES = 20, p = NS) in 34 stented segments of 205 (16.6%) lesions. Plaque prolapse was more frequent in the right coronary artery and in chronic total occlusion lesions. Post-procedure PP volume was 1.95 mm3 in BMS, 2.96 mm3 in SES, and 4.53 mm3 in PES. At follow-up, tissue volume increased at PP sites in both BMS and PES, but not after SES. Neointimal proliferation was similar between PP and non-PP sites. Stent thrombosis and restenosis rates were similar between PP and non-PP lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PP after implantation of new generation tubular stents in patients with diabetes remains high. Drug-eluting stent implantation was not associated with increased risk of PP. Plaque prolapse was not associated with stent thrombosis or increased neointimal proliferation.     

Coexistent in-stent restenosis, late incomplete stent apposition and mural thrombus in a zotarolimus-eluting stent

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, some studies found an increased rate of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) and late stent thrombosis (ST) in DES compared to traditional bare-metal stents (BMS). Endeavor stent, a new cobalt-alloy DES coated with phosphorylcholine and zotarolimus, has been reported to have a very favorable safety profile with few documented late-acquired ISA and late ST. In the present report, we described an interesting case with coexistent ISR, late ISA and mural thrombus in an Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent 8 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

急性心肌梗死患者药物支架置入术后支架贴壁不良特征及对预后的影响

目的探讨急性心肌梗死患者置入西罗莫司药物洗脱支架后,支架贴壁不良(ISA)的特征及ISA对临床预后的影响。方法选择197例冠心病(300处病变)患者置入西罗莫司药物洗脱支架。根据临床表现分为急性心肌梗死组(67例,117处病变),不稳定性心绞痛组(73例,99处病变),稳定性心绞痛组(57例,84处病变)。术后1年血管造影时利用血管内超声观察各组患者支架置入处ISA的发生率和特征.根据ISA造声情况又分为贴壁不良患者和非贴壁不良患者.并在复查后1年临床随访主要不良心脏事件(包括靶病变再次血运重建,非致命性心肌梗死,心源性死亡和全因死亡)。结果急性心肌梗死组支架置入后,有17例患者(17处病变.25.4%)在1年随访检查时存在ISA,明显高于不稳定性心绞痛组(7例患者,7处病变,9.6%)和稳定性心绞痛组[(4例患者,4处病变,7.0%),P=0.005]。多因素回归分析显示,病变长度(OR=1.068,P=0.037)、急性心肌梗死(OR=2.399,P=0.031)和非糖尿病(OR=6.472.P=0.013)是晚期ISA的独立危险因素。对ISA患者1年临床随访显示,ISA患者与非ISA患者主要心脏不良事件无统计学差异(7.1% vs 2.4%,P=0.203)。结论急性心肌梗死患者置入西罗莫司药物洗脱支架后ISA的发生率较高。支架置入后晚期ISA与临床事件的关系仍需进一步研究。     

Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the predictive value of minimum stent area (MSA) for long-term patency of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) implantation compared to bare metal stents (BMS). BACKGROUND: Although MSA is a consistent predictor of in-stent restenosis, its predictive value in BMS is still limited because of biologic variability in the restenosis process. METHODS: From the SIRolImUS (SIRIUS) trial, 122 cases (SES: 72; BMS: 50) with complete serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (baseline and 8-month follow-up) were analyzed. Postprocedure MSA and follow-up minimum lumen area (MLA) were obtained. Based on previous physiologic studies, adequate stent patency at follow-up was defined as MLA >4 mm(2). RESULTS: In both groups, a significant positive correlation was observed between baseline MSA and follow-up MLA (SES: p < 0.0001, BMS: p < 0.0001). However, SES showed higher correlation than BMS (0.8 vs. 0.65) with a higher regression coefficient (0.92 vs. 0.59). The sensitivity and specificity curves identified different optimal thresholds of MSA to predict adequate follow-up MLA: 5 mm(2) for SES and 6.5 mm(2) for BMS. The positive predictive values with these cutoff points were 90% and 56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this SIRIUS IVUS substudy, SES reduced both biologic variability and restenosis, resulting in increased predictability of long-term stent patency with postprocedure MSA. In addition, SES had a considerably lower optimal MSA threshold compared to BMS.     

The incidence and predictors of postprocedural incomplete stent apposition after angiographically successful drug‐eluting stent implantation

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of postprocedural incomplete stent apposition (ISA) after angiographically successful drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation. Background: The deployed stents are usually evaluated by angiography alone; however, there are possibilities of postprocedural ISA despite the angiographically successful implantation. Methods: A total of 339 lesions in which poststent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed after successful DES implantation was included. Paclitaxel‐eluting stents were implanted in 237 lesions and sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) in 102 lesions. Clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics and IVUS findings for all cases were analyzed. Results: The overall incidence of ISA was 13.9% (47/339). By multivariate analysis, male gender (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.09–5.11), deployment of SES (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.49–5.67), the presence of intracoronary thrombus (OR: 7.47, 95% CI: 1.67–33.47), and non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction (OR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.09–6.83) were independent predictors for postprocedural ISA after angiographically successful DES implantation. Conclusions: The incidence of postprocedural ISA after angiographically successful implantation of DES was not infrequent. A DES deployment strategy incorporating IVUS guidance might be helpful to reduce the incidence of postprocedural ISA. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Vascular response to sirolimus-eluting stents delivered with a nonaggressive implantation technique: comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES to reduce the risk of restenosis was initially demonstrated in short lesions using stent implantation with routine pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy of the E-SIRIUS trial sought to evaluate local arterial responses to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) delivered with a stent implantation technique allowing direct stenting and only selectively applying high-pressure post-dilatation. METHODS AND RESULTS: IVUS was performed immediately after intervention and at 8-month follow-up in 51 patients randomised to either bare-metal stents (BMS; Bx-Velocitytrade mark; N=20) or SES (Cyphertrade mark N=31). Direct stenting was allowed (24%) and post-dilation was performed only selectively (32%). Lumen dimensions, intimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling were compared between SES and BMS. Subsequently, results of SES in the E-SIRIUS IVUS substudy (N=31) were compared to those of SES in the IVUS substudy of the SIRIUS trial (N=137). SES in SIRIUS IVUS substudy were delivered with 100% pre-dilatation and 77% post-dilatation. Baseline stent and reference segment measurements were similar between BMS and SES in E-SIRIUS IVUS patients. Using SES there was a 96% reduction in intimal hyperplasia volume within the stented segment (1.8+/-4.9 vs 50.6+/-39.7 mm3, P<0.001) and a significantly larger minimal lumen cross sectional area at 8-month follow-up (4.5+/-1.1 vs 2.3+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001). No vessel remodeling was observed with the use of SES. The applied stent implantation technique resulted in a minimal stent/reference vessel area ratio of 0.75+/-0.17 in E-SIRIUS SES as compared to 0.84+/-0.23 in SIRIUS SES (P=0.046). Mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area at follow-up was 0.1+/-0.2 mm2 in the SES group of E-SIRIUS and 0.5+/-0.8 mm2 in the SES group of SIRIUS (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: An implantation technique of SES which includes direct stenting and minimizes the use of high-pressure post-dilatation results in less optimal stent expansion. However, follow-up results compare very favourable to those of BMS and are characterised by even less intimal hyperplasia than after a more forceful implantation of SES.     

Intravascular ultrasound assessed incomplete stent apposition and stent fracture in stent thrombosis after bare metal versus drug-eluting stent treatment the Nordic Intravascular Ultrasound Study (NIVUS)

Background

This prospective multicenter registry used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients with definite stent thrombosis (ST) to compare rates of incomplete stent apposition (ISA), stent fracture and stent expansion in patients treated with drug-eluting (DES) versus bare metal (BMS) stents. ST is a rare, but potential life threatening event after coronary stent implantation. The etiology seems to be multifactorial.

Methods

124 patients with definite ST were assessed by IVUS during the acute ST event. The study was conducted in 15 high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention -centers in the Nordic–Baltic countries.

Results

In early or late ST there were no differences in ISA between DES and BMS. In very late ST, ISA was a more frequent finding in DES than in BMS (52% vs.16%; p = 0.005) and the maximum ISA area was larger in DES compared to BMS (1.1 ± 2.3 mm² vs. 0.1 ± 0.5 mm²; p = 0.004). Further, ISA was more prevalent in sirolimus-eluting than in paclitaxel-eluting stents (58% vs. 37%; p = 0.02). Stent fractures were found both in DES (16%) and BMS (24%); p = 0.28, and not related to time of stent thrombosis occurrence. For stents with nominal diameters ≥ 2.75 mm, 38% of the DES and 22% of the BMS had a minimum stent area of less than 5 mm²; p = 0.14.

Conclusions

Very late stent thrombosis was more prevalent and associated with more extensive ISA in DES than in BMS treated patients. Stent fracture was a common finding in ST after DES and BMS implantation.     

Comparison of neointimal coverage by optical coherence tomography of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent three months after implantation

No detailed data regarding neointimal coverage of bare-metal stents (BMSs) at 3 months after implantation was reported to date. This investigation was designed to evaluate the neointimal coverage of BMSs compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) using optical coherence tomography. A prospective optical coherence tomographic follow-up examination was performed 3 months after stent implantation for patients who underwent BMS (n = 16) or SES implantation (n = 24). Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness on each stent strut and percentage of NIH area in each cross section were measured. Malapposition of stent struts to the vessel wall and the existence of in-stent thrombi were also evaluated. There were 5,076 struts of SESs and 2,875 struts of BMSs identified. NIH thickness and percentage of NIH area in the BMS group were higher than in the SES group (351 +/- 248 vs 31 +/- 39 mum; p <0.0001; 45.0 +/- 14% vs 10.0 +/- 4%; p <0.0001, respectively). The frequency of uncovered struts was higher in the SES group than the BMS group (15% vs 0.1%; p <0.0001). Malapposed struts were observed more frequently in the SES group than the BMS group (15% vs 1.1%; p <0.0001). In conclusion, there was no difference in incidence of in-stent thrombus between the 2 groups (14% vs 0%; p = 0.23). The present study showed almost all BMS struts to be well covered at a 3-month follow-up, suggesting that patients receiving BMS stents may not require dual-antiplatelet therapy >3 months after implantation.     

Outcome after acute incomplete sirolimus-eluting stent apposition as assessed by serial intravascular ultrasound

We investigated the fate of postprocedural incomplete stent apposition (ISA) after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation by evaluating long-term intravascular ultrasound findings in 168 consecutive patients (182 de novo lesions). Postprocedural ISA was defined as > or = 1 stent strut that was clearly separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckle behind the strut without overlapping a side branch. After SES implantation, there were 61 ISA sites in 46 stents in 31 patients (23 at the proximal edge, 7 at the distal edge, and 31 within the stent body). There were no clinical, procedural, or intravascular ultrasound measurement differences between patients and lesions with versus without ISA. At follow-up, 15 acute ISA sites (25%) in 11 patients completely resolved and 40 sites (75%) in 20 patients persisted, although 32 of 46 persisting ISA sites (70%) decreased. There was a greater decrease in effective lumen area and a greater increase in peristent plaque area in the complete-resolution group than in the persistent-ISA group. No lesion developed stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis (angiographic diameter stenosis > 50%). Six acute ISA sites were also associated with new, late acquired ISA, only 1 of which resulted in aneurysm formation. Although most ISAs after SES implantation do not resolve completely, the incidence of restenosis or thrombosis is not affected.     

Sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal low-profile stent for renal artery treatment (GREAT Trial): angiographic follow-up after 6 months and clinical outcome up to 2 years.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the patency of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS). METHODS: Between November 2001 to June 2003, 105 consecutive symptomatic patients (53 men; mean age 65.7 years) with RAS were treated with either a bare-metal (n=52) or a drug-eluting (n=53) low-profile Palmaz-Genesis peripheral stent at 11 centers in a prospective nonrandomized trial. The primary endpoint was the angiographic result at 6 months measured with quantitative vessel analysis by an independent core laboratory. Secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success, clinical patency [no target lesion revascularization (TLR)], blood pressure and antihypertensive drug use, worsening of renal function, and no major adverse events at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, the overall in-stent diameter stenosis for BMS was 23.9%+/-22.9% versus 18.7%+/-15.6% for SES (p=0.39). The binary restenosis rate was 6.7% for SES versus 14.6% for the BMS (p=0.30). After 6 months and 1 year, TLR rate was 7.7% and 11.5%, respectively, in the BMS group versus 1.9% at both time points in the SES group (p=0.21). This rate remained stable up to the 2-year follow-up but did not reach significance due to the small sample. Even as early as 6 months, both types of stents significantly improved blood pressure and reduced antihypertensive medication compared to baseline (p<0.01). After 6 months, renal function worsened in 4.6% of the BMS patients and in 6.9% of the SES group. The rate of major adverse events was 23.7% for the BMS group and 26.8% for the SES at 2 years (p=0.80). CONCLUSION: The angiographic outcome at 6 months did not show a significant difference between BMS and SES. Renal artery stenting with both stents significantly improved blood pressure. Future studies with a larger patient population and longer angiographic follow-up are warranted to determine if there is a significant benefit of drug-eluting stents in treating ostial renal artery stenosis.     

Intravascular ultrasound comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts (from the RRISC [Reduction of Restenosis In Saphenous Vein Grafts With Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent] trial)

The randomized Reduction of Restenosis In Saphenous Vein Grafts with Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent trial compared angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) versus bare metal stents (BMSs) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). Using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed during 6-month follow-up angiography, we compared the vascular effects of the 2 types of stent on SVGs. Of 75 patients (96 lesions) included, 59 patients underwent IVUS in 61 SVGs; 29 patients received 40 SESs for 34 lesions, and 30 patients received 42 BMSs for 39 lesions. IVUS parameters (diameters, areas, and volumes) were compared in the 2 groups. A specific analysis was performed for overlapping SESs. Median neointimal volume was 1.3 mm(3) (interquartile range 0 to 13.1) in SESs versus 24.5 (7.8 to 39.5) in BMSs (p <0.001). Minimal incomplete stent apposition was detected at only 3 stent edges (2 BMSs, 1 SES) next to ectatic regions of the SVG. Compared with single SESs, overlapping SESs showed significant increases in neointimal reaction, with a neointimal volume of 0.6 mm(3)/mm of stent (0.1 to 1.8) versus 0 (0 to 0.4) in single SESs (p = 0.03), and this phenomenon was mainly localized in overlapping SES segments, where neointimal volume per millimeter of stent was 1.1 mm(3)/mm (0.6 to 4.4) versus 0 (0 to 1.3) in nonoverlapping segments (p = 0.05). In conclusion, SESs effectively inhibit neointimal hyperplasia volume compared with BMSs in diseased vein grafts, without evidence of increased incomplete apposition risk. The neointimal response to overlapping SES layers seems higher than to a single SES layer.     

Safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing emergency procedure

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) reduce restenosis and revascularization rates, compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study investigated the safety and efficacy of SES for emergency PCI in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 154 consecutive patients (SES: n=77, BMS: n=77) admitted to hospital with ACS were enrolled in this study. Procedural success (%DS <50%, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days and 8 months, and the incidence of stent thrombosis were evaluated. There was no difference between the groups regarding procedural success. Patients treated with SES had smaller stent diameter (SES 3.04 mm vs BMS 3.24 mm; p=0.01) and longer stent length (25.7 mm vs 21.2 mm; p=0.01). At 30 days, there was no difference between the groups in the incidence of cardiovascular events. At 8 months, patients treated with the SES had a lower rate of repeat PCI (5.6% vs 18.6%; p=0.04) and MACE (9.7% vs 27.1%; p=0.01). Stent thrombosis was no different between groups (1.4% vs 2.9%). CONCLUSION: In emergency PCI for ACS patients, SES implantation significantly reduced cardiovascular events, compared with BMS, by decreasing the incidence of repeat PCI. The safety profile of SES is equal to that of BMS.     

Randomized trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SESAMI).

OBJECTIVES: To confirm whether sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) safely reduce the incidence of restenosis in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction compared with bare-metal stents (BMS). BACKGROUND: In the setting of primary angioplasty, stent restenosis occurs in up to 27% of patients. The introduction of drug-eluting stents has drastically reduced the incidence of restenosis in clinically stable patients. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial of 320 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction assigned to receive SES or BMS. The primary end point was binary restenosis at 1-year angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: At 1 year, the incidence of binary restenosis was lower in the SES group than in the BMS group (9.3% vs. 21.3%, respectively; p = 0.032), as were the rates of target lesion revascularization (4.3% vs. 11.2%; p = 0.02), target vessel revascularization (5% vs. 13.1; p = 0.015), major adverse cardiac events (6.8% vs. 16.8%; p = 0.005), and target vessel failure (8.7% vs. 18.7%; p = 0.007). The incidence of angiographically documented stent thrombosis was 1.2% (n = 2) in the SES group and 0.6% (n = 1) in the BMS group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, SES are superior to BMS, reducing the incidence of binary restenosis by 56%, target lesion revascularization by 61%, target vessel revascularization by 62%, adverse cardiac events by 59%, and target vessel failure by 53% at 1 year. (Sirolimus Eluting Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00288210; NCT00288210).     

急性冠状动脉综合征患者雷帕霉素洗脱支架晚期贴壁不良及其对临床预后的影响

目的 观察急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者雷帕霉素洗脱支架晚期贴壁不良发生率及其对临床预后的影响.方法 观察2005年2月至2007年3月因ACS(ACS组,54例)和稳定性心绞痛(对照组,83例)行雷帕霉素洗脱支架治疗并于1年后行血管内超声检查患者,检测支架晚期贴壁不良发生率,并观察血管内超声检查后1年内主要不良心血管事件及支架内血栓发生率.结果 所有137例患者219处病变中,16例患者25处病变检测到晚期支架贴壁不良.25处晚期支架贴壁不良中ACS组和对照组分别为20处(22.2%)和5处(3.9%)(P＜0.001).两组患者参照血管外弹力膜面积、参照血管和支架段血管管腔面积和新生内膜面积均相似,但ACS组患者支架段血管外弹力膜面积[(15.34±5.44)mm2比(13.83±4.51)mm2,P=0.026]、支架段血管外弹力膜面积与参照血管外弹力膜面积比值(1.13±0.22比1.02±0.18,P＜0.001)、斑块和中膜面积[(8.43±3.93)mm2比(7.01±2.93)mm2,P:0.002]较对照组明显增大.Logistic多元回归分析显示,ACS(OR=6.477,P＜0.001)和支架长度≥23 mm(OR=3.680,P=0.025)为晚期支架贴壁不良的独立危险因素.血管内超声检查后临床随访1年,两组主要不良心血管事件发生率差异无统计学意义.结论 雷帕霉素洗脱支架置入后,ACS患者较稳定性心绞痛患者更多发生晚期支架贴壁不良,然而随访1年的主要不良心血管事件发生率差异无统计学意义.