Assessment of sonographic quality of anal sphincter muscles in patients with faecal incontinence

Objective  The main application of endoanal ultrasonography (US) in evaluation of faecal incontinence is to identify surgically correctable sphincter defects. The aim of our study was to determine whether qualitative changes in echogenicity and in uniformity of internal (IAS) and external (EAS) anal sphincter muscles detected on endoanal US correlate with other anal laboratory tests and modified Wexner faecal incontinence functional score.
Method  Records on 99 patients having complete information on anorectal manometry, faecal incontinence scoring and available endoanal US imaging of the anal sphincters were included in statistical analysis. Anatomic appearance and changes in echogenicity of the anal sphincter muscles were recorded according to the proposed scoring system. Endoanal US defect and quality component scores for IAS and EAS as well as the total score were correlated with anal laboratory tests and incontinence score using Spearman's correlations test.
Results  There was a trend for correlation between IAS quality score and incontinence score ( P  = 0.06), but no correlation for IAS defect score. EAS defect score had a significant negative correlation with maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) ( P  = 0.031). Distal EAS quality score had a significant correlation with incontinence score ( P  = 0.002). EAS total score correlated with MSP ( P  = 0.02) and incontinence score ( P  = 0.006). Endoanal US total score was significantly correlated with incontinence score ( P  = 0.006), maximal resting (MRP) ( P  = 0.035) and MSP ( P  = 0.045) and high pressure anal canal zone length ( P  = 0.03).
Conclusion  Sonographic morphology of anal sphincter muscles correlates with anal laboratory tests and functional incontinence score. Qualitative ultrasound scoring instrument may improve evaluation of patients with faecal incontinence.     

Anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence symptoms after repair of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations in primiparous women

A study was carried out to identify (1) incidence of anal incontinence symptoms, (2) incidence and size of both external anal sphincter (EAS) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) defects, and (3) relationship between anal incontinence symptoms and IAS or EAS defect size after repair of an obstetric anal sphincter laceration. Forty-seven vaginally primiparous women underwent obstetric anal sphincter laceration repair. At 8–12 weeks postpartum, anal incontinence symptoms were assessed, and endoanal ultrasound was performed. At 1–2 years postpartum, symptoms were reassesseds. The incidence of anal incontinence symptoms at 8–12 weeks was 43%. The incidence of IAS and EAS defects were 32% and 77%, respectively. IAS defects ≥45 degrees were predictive of symptoms (p = 0.02). After 18 months mean follow-up, 11% reported chronic symptoms. After anal sphincter laceration repair, anal incontinence symptoms occur in 43% of women and remain chronic in 11%. Anal incontinence symptoms are associated with increasing IAS defect size. Poster presentation at the American Urogynecologic Society Annual Meeting, Hollywood, Florida, USA, 27–29 September 2007.     

Colorectal 25

Aims: To assess anal sphincter structure and functional outcomes following third-degree perineal tears and the effect of its disruption on the development of anal incontinence. Methods: Fifty-one consecutive patients, 41 primigravidae and 10 multigravidae, with third-degree intrapartum perineal tears, primarily repaired, were recruited 4 months postpartum. Patients completed questionnaires assessing faecal incontinence. Anal manometry and endosonography were then performed. Results: No patient reported incontinence prior to pregnancy. The incidence of faecal incontinence was 12 per cent. Six patients were incontinent of faeces and 10 incontinent of either flatus and/or fluid. Eighty-one per cent of anal incontinent patients were primigravidae (OR 0.96). Three women had previous third-degree tears, with one anal incontinence on subsequent delivery. Disruption of the external anal sphincter (EAS) was identified endosonographically in 26 patients. In 13 patients, there was an associated internal anal sphincter (IAS) defect. Clinically unsuspected tears of the Anal sphincter mechanism were diagnosed by anal endosonography in 46 per cent of asymptomatic patients. The EAS alone was involved in 14, IAS in three, and both in five patients. Clinical examination of women with anal incontinence identified an anal sphincter defect in 46 per cent. Ultrasound in anal incontinent patients showed an IAS defect in 42 per cent and an EAS defect in 52 per cent. All patients with faecal incontinence had a disruption of the EAS identified by endosonography (P < 0.05). No significant relationship was demonstrated between symptoms and anal manometry (P = 1.0, n.s.). Conclusions: Third-degree tears cause significant, although clinically unsuspected anal sphincter defects. It may be that anal manometry alone is not sufficient to exclude sphincter injury.     

Importance of evacuatory disturbance in evaluation of faecal incontinence after third degree obstetric tear

OBJECTIVE: To correlate anorectal function including rectal evacuation with anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasound in women with third degree obstetric anal sphincter injury repaired at the time of delivery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four women with repaired third degree tears underwent anorectal physiology, anal ultrasonography and clinical assessment using the St. Marks incontinence score (0-24). Evacuatory disturbance was assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between disturbed evacuation and incontinence symptoms (P=0.030). There was also a significant correlation between disturbed evacuation and internal anal sphincter (IAS) injury (P=0.026), but there was no correlation with external anal sphincter (EAS) injury. There was a correlation between disturbed evacuation and low resting anal pressure (P=0.013). Although IAS defects were associated with low anal pressure, only the correlation with Maximum Squeeze Pressure reached statistical significance (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Women with evacuatory disturbance after repaired third degree tears have a greater level of incontinence than those whose emptying is normal. This association is related to internal sphincter injury and reduced anal sphincter pressures.     

Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence?

Objective Sacral nerve modulation (SNM) for the treatment of faecal incontinence was originally performed in patients with an intact anal sphincter or after repair of a sphincter defect. There is evidence that SNM can be performed in patients with faecal incontinence and an anal sphincter defect. Method Two groups of patients were analysed retrospectively to determine whether SNM is as effective in patients with faecal incontinence associated with an anal sphincter defect as in those with a morphologically intact anal sphincter following anal repair (AR). Patients in group A had had an AR resulting in an intact anal sphincter ring. Group B included patients with a sphincter defect which was not primarily repaired. Both groups underwent SNM. All patients had undergone a test stimulation percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) followed by a subchronic test over 3 weeks. If the PNE was successful, a permanent SNM electrode was implanted. Follow‐up visits for the successfully permanent implanted patients were scheduled at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Results Group A consisted of 20 (19 women) patients. Eighteen (90%) had a positive subchronic test stimulation. Twelve patients had a successful SNM implant during middle‐term follow‐up. Group B consisted of 20 women. The size of the defect in the anal sphincter varied between 17% and 33% of the anal circumference. Fourteen (70%) had a positive subchronic test stimulation. Twelve patients had a successful SNM implant during middle‐term follow‐up. In both groups, the mean number of incontinence episodes decreased significantly with SNM (test vs baseline: P = 0.0001, P = 0.0002). There was no significant difference in resting and squeeze pressures during SNM in group A, but in group B squeeze pressure had increased significantly at 24 months. Comparison of patient characteristics and outcome between groups A and B revealed no statistical differences. Conclusion A morphologically intact anal sphincter is not a prerequisite for success in the treatment of faecal incontinence with SNM. An anal sphincter defect of <33% of the circumference can be effectively treated primarily with SNM without repair.     

Correlation between anal manometry and endosonography in females with faecal incontinence

Objective Female faecal incontinence (FI) is largely because of sphincter injury at childbirth. Sphincter assessment aims to identify surgically correctable defects. We aimed to identify endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS) parameters that correlate with sphincter function. Method One hundred females with FI and 28 healthy asymptomatic females were prospectively assessed. Wexner FI score was recorded and all subjects underwent anorectal manometry and EAUS. Multiple EAUS parameters were assessed and correlated with external (EAS) and internal (IAS) anal sphincter function, determined by maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) and maximum resting pressure (MRP) respectively. Parameters included sphincter quality (echogenicity), thickness, perineal body thickness (PBT) and defect characteristics (angle, length). Results are expressed as medians and interquartile range (IQR). Results Median Wexner score was 14 (12–17). Maximum EAS thickness significantly correlated with MSP (P = 0.019). EAS defects were detected in 84 patients and seven controls (P < 0.0001). Full‐length EAS defects were only detected in FI group and had significantly lower MSP [MSP mmHg: full length 85 (65–103) vs partial length 119 (75–155), P = 0.006]. FI patients were more likely to have a mixed echogenicity of EAS compared with controls. EAS ring quality, PBT and defect angle were not significant. IAS quality was significantly associated with MRP [MRP mmHg: uniform 62 (43–82) vs mixed 47 (30.5–57.5), P = 0.002]. Conclusion Certain EAUS parameters can be predictive of anal sphincter function. These include the presence of an EAS defect and its length, EAS maximum thickness, IAS ring quality. Integration of these parameters can give better EAUS correlation with manometry for FI evaluation.     

Three‐dimensional endoanal ultrasonography of external anal sphincter defects in patients with faecal incontinence: correlation with symptoms and manometry

Aim Anal sphincter anatomy on two‐dimensional endoanal ‐ultrasonography (EUS) does not always correlate with the clinical data. The purpose of this study was to determine whether three‐dimensional (3D) measurements yield a better correlation. Method The study group included consecutive patients who underwent 3D EUS for faecal incontinence over a 2‐year period. The medical charts were reviewed for Cleveland Clinic Foundation Fecal Incontinence (CCF‐FI) score and manometric pressures. Endoanal ultrasonographic images were reviewed for the presence of an external anal sphincter (EAS) defect and its extent, as determined by the radial angle, length in the sagittal plane and percentage volume deficit. Correlational analyses were performed between the clinical and imaging data. Results Sixty‐one patients of median age 53 years (range 15–82) were evaluated. Thirty‐two patients had either a complete (17) or partial (15) EAS defect, and 29 patients had an intact sphincter. The CCF‐FI scores were similar in patients with and without an EAS defect (12.5 ± 5.6 and 11.4 ± 5.5, respectively). The intact‐sphincter group had a significantly greater EAS length (3 ± 0.4 vs 2 ± 0.62 cm, P = 0.02) and higher mean maximal squeeze pressure (MMSP; 99.7 ± 52.6 vs 66.9 ± 52.9 mmHg, P = 0.009). There were no statistically significant correlations between MMSP, CCF‐FI score and EAS status on 3D EUS. Mean percentage volume of the defect was similar in patients with complete and partial tears (14.5 ± 5.5 and 17.5 ± 7.2%, P = 0.25) and showed no correlation with physiological tests or symptom scores. Conclusion Improvements in external anal sphincter imaging have not yielded a better association with the clinical findings. The lack of clinical differences between patients with different EAS tears may reflect their similar volumetric defects.     

Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence

Objective Faecal incontinence often persists after surgery for rectal prolapse. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed as responsible, however, anal sphincter integrity has only been studied in a handful of cases. This study assesses the incidence of ultrasound detected anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Methods Retrospective search of medical records at Flinders Medical Centre over a 7‐year period to identify patients with full thickness rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence who had undergone endosonographical imaging of the anal sphincter complex. Anal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency studies were also included. Results Twenty‐one patients were identified (1 male, 20 female) of median age 67.5 years. Fifteen (71%) subjects had an abnormality in the anal sphincter complex on endoanal ultrasound. Of these, the defects in 4 (19%) patients were isolated to the internal sphincter, 3 (14%) to the external sphincter and in the remaining 8 (38%) subjects, defects were found in both internal and external sphincters. The degree of sphincteric defect was variable but at least 6 (29%) of the study group had full‐length external sphincter tears. In the 19 patients studied, anal manometry revealed reduced basal and squeeze pressures in the majority. Delayed pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was evident in 9 of 18 patients studied. Conclusion Anal sphincter tears are common in patients presenting with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. The faecal incontinence associated with prolapse appears to be multifactorial in aetiology. Anal sphincter defects are likely to contribute to persistent faecal incontinence or recurrence following rectal prolapse. Endoanal ultrasound derived knowledge of anal sphincter injury may guide surgical management in problematic cases.     

Symptoms and anal sphincter morphology following primary repair of third-degree tears

BACKGROUND: Approximately 0.6-9 per cent of vaginal deliveries are complicated by third-degree tears. The precise impact of such injuries on future pelvic floor function remains unknown. The aim of this study was to define the extent of structural and physiological damage to the anal sphincter and to investigate anorectal function in women who sustained third-degree tears during vaginal delivery. METHODS: Fifty-six women who sustained a third-degree tear were investigated prospectively. All patients had a primary repair of the anal sphincter complex, and were assessed by anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasonography at a mean of 3.6 months. Symptoms were assessed by direct personal interview and also by a self-completed questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-four patients had a persistent anal sphincter defect on ultrasonography. The mean resting and squeeze anal canal pressures were significantly lower in patients with a combined defect than in those in whom the repair was intact (P = 0.036 and P = 0.005 respectively). At direct interview three patients volunteered current symptoms of faecal and/or urinary incontinence whereas 32 reported bothersome symptoms on the questionnaire (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The anatomical and physiological damage sustained during third-degree tears appears to be much greater than is generally appreciated. Primary repair does not provide lasting integrity. A self-administered questionnaire appears to be more accurate in defining the symptomatology.     

Anal sphincter function and integrity after primary repair of third-degree tear: uncontrolled prospective analysis

Background: The purpose of the present paper was to determine the anatomical integrity and functional effect of a tear to the anal sphincter in women after vaginal delivery. Methods: A prospective review of third‐ and fourth‐degree vaginal tears over a 3 year period at Lyell McEwin and Queen Elizabeth Hospitals, Adelaide. Obstetric details were obtained from the records. All were counselled by a continence advisor and offered consultation with a colorectal surgeon. The integrity of the anal sphincter was assessed by endoanal ultrasound. Results: During the study period there were 6875 vaginal deliveries. There were 89 women (1.3%) who had a third‐ or fourth‐degree tear. Fifty‐one (57%) agreed to participate. Primiparity (67%), episiotomy (49%), forceps delivery (29%) and instrumental delivery were common in women sustaining a tear. Symptoms of anal incontinence (mild) or faecal urgency were described in 23 women (45%). Except for three women with an anovaginal fistula none required surgery for the management of faecal incontinence. A sphincter defect was seen in 27 women (53%) on endoanal ultrasound. The presence or absence of a sphincter defect was not significantly associated with symptoms but a trend was suggested (χ² = 3.21; P = 0.07). Conclusions: Third‐degree tear after vaginal delivery was a significant intrapartum event, yet associated only with minimal symptoms (excluding patients with anovaginal fistula) even in the presence of a sphincter defect on anal ultrasound.     

Predictive factors for faecal incontinence after third or fourth degree obstetric tears: a clinico-physiologic study

Objective  This is a prospective study to review the natural history of anorectal dysfunction after primary repair for third or fourth degree obstetric tear and to identify the predictive factors for significant faecal incontinence.
Method  From January 2003 to December 2005, 121 consecutive women (mean age 29.9 ± 4.7) who sustained third or fourth degree obstetric tears were assessed. All had primary repair by obstetricians. They were assessed using anorectal physiology testing and endoanal ultrasound. Short-term (3-month postpartum) and medium-term (mean 18.8 ± 7.7 months) Wexner's continence scores were obtained.
Results  Among the 121 women, seven were excluded because of incomplete follow-up. At short-term assessment, 25 out of 114 women were incontinent. One of them underwent another sphincter repair for significant faecal incontinence. Twenty-one and three patients respectively, had mild (Wexner's score 1–4) and moderate (Wexner's score 5–8) symptoms. At medium-term assessment, 24 patients remained incontinent; of these, 20 had mild symptoms (Wexner's score 1–4) and four had moderate incontinence (Wexner's score 5–8). The parity ( P  =   0.04), degree of obstetric tear ( P  =   0.036) and short-term Wexner's scores at 3 months postpartum ( P  <   0.0001) were significantly related to the change in Wexner's scores at medium-term assessment. However, the short-term Wexner's score was the only identifiable predictive factor for significant faecal incontinence.
Conclusion  Most women suffering from third or fourth degree obstetric tear were continent or mildly incontinent. Poor Wexner's score at short-term assessment at 3 months postpartum was predictive of faecal incontinence in the medium-term.     

Effect of a new guideline on outcome following third-degree perineal tears: results of a 3-year audit

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a new guideline on the outcome of repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears by examining adherence to the guideline and the effect upon the incidence of symptoms of anal incontinence. An audit of third-degree perineal tears was conducted in 1997. A reaudit was completed in 1998 and 1999 after the introduction of a new guideline. The audits were conducted in a tertiary obstetric unit with 5000 deliveries per annum. Over the 3-year period between 1997 and 1999 124 women with a third-degree tear were identified; 14 381 women who had delivered vaginally without third-degree tears were used as controls. The main outcome measure was the number of cases with adherence to the protocol, and the number of patients with ongoing symptoms. Cases were identified from the hospital database, and case notes were reviewed to obtain clinical data. The incidence of third-degree perineal tears was 0.81% over the 3-year period. Following the introduction of a new guideline there was a significant increase in the number of repairs performed in theatre (70% vs 82% vs 97%, P<0.05), using Prolene (64% vs 76% vs 93%, P< 0.05), with adequate anesthesia (70% vs 82% vs 97%, P<0.05). At follow-up there was a transient improvement in defecatory symptoms in the first year of the protocol only (45% vs 32% vs 50%, P<0.01). More patients had complete follow-up data after introduction of the protocol: 66% vs 86% vs 80% (P<0.001). There were more cases of Prolene suture migration (7% vs 34% vs 16%, P<0.01). We concluded that the introduction of a new guideline was followed by improved performance of appropriate repair. There was no sustained improvement in fecal symptoms at follow-up. Editorial Comment: This study highlights to important issues regarding primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. First, the need for adequate training and supervision of residents is required for optimal repair of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Junior residents often perform these repairs with inadequate training, lack of supervision, and in adverse operative conditions. The authors devised a protocol primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations in order to improve surgical outcome and resident training. Second, the optimal method of repairing obstetric anal sphincter lacerations has not been fully determined. The feasibility of overlap versus end-to-end techniques has been examined in two randomized clinical trials, each with significantly different results. A multicenter randomized study comparing overlap versus end-to-end repair is required.     

Perineum compression during EAUS enhances visualization of anterior anal sphincter defects

Objective  Endo-anal ultrasound (EAUS) can detect anal sphincter injuries. However, anterior external anal sphincter (EAS) defects can be difficult to define. We assessed different EAUS techniques to determine if any particular method improved defect identification.
Method  Ninety females with faecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Wexner faecal incontinence scores were obtained. All patients underwent anorectal manometry and EAUS using three different techniques: standard, digit-assisted (gloved finger pressing on posterior vaginal wall) and balloon-assisted (standard balloon inflated into the vagina). The three techniques were assessed by comparing defect characteristics (detection, angle, edges and scar tissue), and perineal body thickness. All measurements were performed at the mid anal canal level. Results are expressed as medians (IQR).
Results  Standard EAUS (S-EAUS) identified a sphincter defect in 54 patients. Digit assisted EAUS (D-EAUS) and balloon-assisted EAUS (B-EAUS) ultrasound revealed a sphincter defect in additional 11 and 9 patients respectively compared to S-EAUS. Correlation of maximum squeeze pressure with EAUS findings improved on D-EAUS and B-EAUS. The defect angle was significantly wider with D-EAUS and B-EAUS [S-EAUS 90°(63–97), D-EAUS 100°(81–101.5), B-EAUS 100°(80–105), P  = 0.0005]. The perineal body was significantly thicker when measured with B-EAUS [D-EAUS 9 mm (7–10) vs B-EAUS 10 mm (8–11), P  = 0.0005]. Inter-observer agreement was comparable [S-EAUS (K) = 0.677, D-EAUS (K) = 0.658, B-EAUS (K) = 0.601].
Conclusion  EAS anterior defect detection and definition on EAUS may be improved by the demarcation and gentle pressure on the posterior vaginal wall.     

Primary repair of advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears: should it be performed by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique?

Advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears are often associated with a high incidence of fecal and flatus incontinence. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome of these repairs when done by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum. Between August 2005 and December 2006, all grades 3 and 4 obstetric anal sphincter tears in our department were repaired by a reconstructive pelvic surgeon, primarily using the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum. All women were followed every 6 months using the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire, a physical examination of the anal sphincter, anal manometry, and transperineal anal sonography. There were 3,478 deliveries of which 22 (0.63%) anal sphincter tears were repaired in women aged 22-41 years. Two women were diagnosed with Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists grade 3a, eight with grade 3b, nine with grade 3c, and three with grade 4 anal sphincter tears. Postoperatively, 21 patients attended the outpatient clinic, with an average follow-up time of 9.2+/-1.4 months. Only two women (9.5%) complained of flatus incontinence and fecal urgency and had mildly decreased anal sphincter squeeze pressure and a small sonographic anal sphincter defect. None of the women complained of fecal incontinence. Two women (9.5%) reported on transient perineal pain and one (4.8%) on transient dyspareunia. All other women were asymptomatic and had normal anal manometry and sonographic evaluation. Repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears using the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum seems to carry favorable clinical outcome and reduced risk for anal incontinence, perineal pain, and sexual dysfunction.     

肛管内超声对排粪失禁患儿肛门括约肌受损程度的评价

目的探讨肛管内超声对肛门内括约肌（IAS）、肛门外括约肌（EAS）及耻骨直肠肌（PR）形态及完整性的评估,从而为排粪失禁的原因及治疗方案的制订提供客观依据。方法回顾性分析2009年12月至2012年11月间山东大学第二医院收治的14例先天性肛门直肠畸形术后及4例先天性巨结肠术后排粪失禁患儿的临床资料。应用肛管内超声对IAS、EAS及PR进行观察,并进行括约肌受损程度评分;同时行肛管直肠测压评分和肛门功能评分,通过Spearman秩相关分析评价括约肌评分与肛管直肠测压评分和肛门功能评分之间的相关性。结果18例患儿中男13例,女5例,年龄10—16岁。肛门括约肌受损评分结果显示,括约肌轻度受损11例,中度受损65J,重度受损1例;另有PR受损4例。括约肌评分与肛管直肠测压评分之间呈正相关（P〈0．05）,而与肛门功能评分无明显相关性（P〉0．05）。结论肛管内超声可清楚显示IAS、EAS和PR的形态,明确其是否完整及受损程度,是评价肛门直肠畸形术后排粪失禁患儿非常有价值的方法,但并不能完全反映括约肌及肛门的功能状况。     

Imbrication of the external anal sphincter may yield similar functional results as overlapping repair in selected patients

Objective Overlapping external anal sphincter repair is the preferred procedure for incontinent patients with functional yet anatomically disrupted anterior external anal sphincter. When incomplete disruption, thinning or technically difficult mobilization of the external anal sphincter occurs, imbrication without division may be the more feasible surgical option. The aim of the study was to assess retrospectively the indications for external anal sphincter imbrication in patients who underwent either overlapping external anal sphincter repair or external anal sphincter imbrication, and to compare the success rates. Method Patients who had external anal sphincter repair and follow up of at least 3 months were studied. Fecal incontinence was measured using the validated Wexner fecal Incontinence Scoring system (0 = perfect continence, 20 = complete incontinence); postoperative scores 0–10 were interpreted as successful, and scores of 11–20 as failures. Results A total of 131 females who had anal sphincter repair between 1988 and 2000 were analysed. One hundred and twenty‐one patients had overlapping external anal sphincter repair (group I), and 10 had external anal sphincter imbrication (group II). Indications for external anal sphincter imbrication were attenuation of the external anal sphincter without overt defect (n = 5), partial disruption of external anal sphincter with muscle fibres bridging the scar (n = 2), thick bulk of scar between the muscle edges (n = 2), and wide lateral retraction of the muscle edges (n = 1). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups relative to preoperative incontinence score (16.5 vs 16.5, P = 0.99), pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment (left 9.6%vs 0.0%, P = 0.19; right 13.4%vs 11.1%, P = 0.84), and extent of electromyography pathology (61%vs 47%, P = 0.30). The patients in group I were younger than those in group II (mean age 50.8 years vs. 61.7 years, respectively; P = 0.052) and the length of follow‐up was significantly longer (32.3 months vs 14.3 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both procedures had similar success rates (59.5%vs 60%; P = 0.98). Conclusion Imbrication of the external anal sphincter may yield similar results as overlapping external anal sphincter repair in patients with incomplete external anal sphincter disruptions, external anal sphincter attenuation, and in patients presenting with wide lateral retraction of the muscle edges.     

Delayed sphincter repair for obstetric ruptures: Analysis of failure

Objective The aim of this study was to examine the clinical results after anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma and to evaluate possible risk factors for poor outcome. Patients and methods In years 1990–99 anterior anal sphincter repair for anal incontinence due to obstetric trauma was performed in 39 patients at Helsinki University Central Hospital. Clinical examination with Parks' classification and patients' questionnaire with endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) were done before and after surgery. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was measured postoperatively. The median follow‐up time after the operation was 22 months (range 2–99). Results The follow‐up results of the patients' questionnaire for 12 patients (31%) were good, for 15 patients (38%) acceptable and for 12 patients (31%) poor. Postoperative EAUS showed sphincter overlap in 28 (72%) patients but a defect was still found in 11 (28%) patients. A defect found on postoperative EAUS correlated with poor clinical result according to Parks' (R = 0.8, P < 0.01) and patients' questionnaire results (R = 0.7, P < 0.01). Patients with poor clinical results (Parks III/IV) were statistically significantly older (median 63 years, range 26–73) than those with favourable results (Parks I/II) (median 45 years, range 27–79) (P < 0.05). Further, the duration of incontinence symptoms correlated with poor functional results (R = 0.4, P < 0.05). Conclusion After obstetric trauma anterior anal repair gives acceptable short‐term clinical results. EAUS investigation is easy and harmless to perform and should be used pre‐ and post‐operatively. Advanced age, pre‐operative signs of perineal descent, long‐lasting severe incontinence symptoms and a persistent defect on postoperative EAUS seem to be related to poor clinical result.     

Evaluation of the use of PTQTMimplants for the treatment of incontinent patients due to internal anal sphincter dysfunction

Objective This study reports the results of injectable silicone PTQ^TM implants for faecal incontinence due to internal anal sphincter (IAS) dysfunction. Method Twenty patients (12 women) with partial faecal incontinence aged from 55 to 65 years were treated by a PTQ^TM implant. All patients completed the Cleveland Clinic Continence and Quality of Life questionnaire. Endoluminal ultrasound and anorectal physiological testing were performed in each patient. All implants were inserted into the submucosal plane without ultrasound guidance. Results Faecal continence was significantly improved up to 1 year. The Wexner continence score fell from a median of 13.05 (range, 5–20) before treatment to 4.5 (range 2–7.7) at 1 month after (P < 0.005). This rose gradually to 6.2 (range, 0–16) at one year (P = 0.02) and 9.4 (range, 1–20) at 2 years (P = 0.127). There were no differences in resting or squeeze pressure before and at 3 months after treatment (P = 0.86 and P = 0.93). Fourteen (70%) patients experienced pruritus ani during the first few weeks after the procedure and one developed infection at the implant site. Conclusion Silicone implantation is minimally invasive and technically simple. It is effective over 1 year in the treatment of faecal incontinence due to IAS dysfunction.     

Anorectal function evaluation and predictive factors for faecal incontinence in 600 patients

Aim Anorectal function was assessed in patients with and without faecal incontinence (FI) . Risk factors predictive for FI were determined. Method Between 2003 and 2009, all consecutive patients referred were assessed by questionnaire, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Predictive factors were identified and used to develop a statistical model to predict FI. Results Of 600 patients (519 women), 285 (48%) were faecally incontinent. In comparison with continent women, incontinent women (mean Vaizey score 15.4), were older, had more liquid stools, more deliveries, more urinary incontinence, lower anal pressures, shorter sphincter length, smaller rectal capacity and more sphincter defects. Incontinent men (mean Vaizey score 15.3) were older and had lower anal pressures. Incontinent and continent patients showed an overlap in test results. Predictors in women were age, stool consistency, anal pressures, rectal capacity, and internal and external sphincter defects. The area under the ROC‐curve was 0.84 (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.87). Using a cut off point of 0.4, FI was predicted with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 86%, 68%, 74% and 82%, respectively. The model was studied in five women with a temporary stoma and was accurate in predicting FI after stoma closure. Conclusion Incontinent patients have lower pressures, smaller rectal capacity and more sphincter defects than controls, but show a large overlap. Our model shows a relatively high sensitivity and negative predictive value for predicting FI in women. The model seems promising in the patients studied with a temporary stoma.     

Outcome of excision of megarectum in children with anorectal malformation

Background/Purpose

Megarectum in association with anorectal malformation contributes to chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. Resection of megarectum in anorectal malformation improves bowel function, but neuropathy and poor sphincter quality may affect the outcome of fecal continence adversely. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of resection of megarectum in anorectal malformation and to ascertain the impact of anal sphincter quality and neuropathy on the outcome.

Methods

We studied 62 children with intractable fecal incontinence after repair of anorectal malformation between January 1991 and January 2005. All patients were investigated with anorectal manometry and anal endosonography under ketamine anesthesia. On endosonography, an intact or scarred internal anal sphincter (IAS) was classified as good and a fragmented or absent IAS as poor. On manometry, a resting anal sphincter pressure equal to or more than 30 mm Hg was classified as good and a lower pressure as poor. Functional assessment of fecal continence was done before and after excision of megarectum using a modified Wingfield scores.

Results

Sixteen children had excision of megarectum with median age of 9 years (range, 2-15 years) and postoperative follow-up of 5 years (range, 1-10 years). Seven had formation of antegrade continent enema stoma before excision of megarectum. Children were classified into three groups of anomalies: low (n = 6), intermediate (n = 4), and high (n = 6). All children were incontinent of feces. After excision of megarectum, of the 9 children with good IAS and no neuropathy, 7 became continent of feces. Of the remaining 7 children, 4 had poor IAS and 3 had neuropathy, 5 of whom required an antegrade continent enema stoma to be clean.

Conclusion

Excision of megarectum in children who had previous repair of anorectal malformation results in fecal continence in the presence of a good IAS and absence of neuropathy. Patients with a poor IAS or neuropathy will often require artificial means of fecal continence.