Recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: We present the results of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for superficial esophageal cancer in patients treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital East since March 1993, and discuss the factors involved in local recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study consisted of 51 patients with a total of 57 superficial esophageal cancers which were treated by EMR at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between March 1993 and March 1998. EMR was performed with a two-channel fiberscope or with the assistance of the endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection tube. Follow-up examinations by means of endoscopy with iodine staining and biopsy were repeated every 3-6 months. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients had double cancers; 12 had head and neck cancers (HNC), six had stomach cancers, and one had lung cancer. The patients with HNC tended to have multiple iodine-unstained areas, and multiple cancers in the esophagus. Local recurrence was detected in two out of five patients (40%) with multiple esophageal cancers, and in two out of 46 patients (4%) with solitary cancer (P=0.0433). There was no difference in the rate of local recurrence between patients with HNC and those without HNC. Three out of four patients with recurrent cancers were given additional treatment, EMR for two and radiotherapy alone for one; no further recurrence occurred except in the patient who underwent radiotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplicity of cancer is a risk factor for local recurrence. Appropriate additional treatment should be indicated for recurrent lesions.     

Expansion of the indications for endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a minimally invasive local treatment for superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC). The use of EMR in patients with m3 or sm1 SEC remains controversial, however. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the histopathological risk factors for lymph-node metastasis and recurrence in patients with m3 or sm1 SEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study subjects were 43 patients with m3 or sm1 esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas: 23 patients were treated surgically (the surgery group), and 20 were treated by EMR (the EMR group). We assessed the following variables of the specimens resected by surgery or EMR: tumor depth, maximal surface diameter of the tumor (superficial size), maximum diameter of tumor invasion at the lamina muscularis mucosae (LMM invasion width), and lymphatic invasion. The relationships of these variables to lymph-node metastasis and recurrence were examined. RESULTS: In the surgery group, lymph-node metastasis was found in four patients, all of whom had tumors with lymphatic invasion, a superficial size of at least 25 mm, and an LMM invasion width of at least 2500 microm. In the EMR group, no patient met all three of these criteria, and there was no evidence of lymph-node metastasis or distant metastasis on follow-up after EMR (median follow-up 39 months). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with m3 or sm1 SEC, tumors that have lymphatic invasion, larger superficial size, and wider LMM invasion are associated with a high risk for lymph-node metastasis. EMR might be indicated for the treatment of patients with m3 or sm1 SECs without these characteristics.     

Intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in short-segment Barrett's esophagus (SSBE): curative treatment using local endoscopic treatment techniques

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In recent years, short-segment Barrett's esophagus (SSBE) has attracted increasing attention in the context of reflux disease. However, there is continuing controversy regarding its potential for malignant transformation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1996 and September 1999, 50/115 patients (43 %) with intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia or early Barrett's adenocarcinoma, who underwent local endoscopic treatment, had developed a malignant lesion in an (SSBE). In the framework of a prospective observational study, 28 patients were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 13 with photodynamic therapy, and three with argon plasma coagulation; six patients received combinations of these treatments. RESULTS: Complete local remission was achieved in 48/49 patients (98 %). One patient switched to surgery after the first EMR, because there was submucosal tumor infiltration, and in one patient out of 50 local endoscopic treatment failed. A mean of 1.7 +/- 1.4 treatment sessions was required for local endoscopic treatment. The method-associated mortality was 0 %. The rate of relevant complications (stenosis, bleeding) was 6 % (3/50 patients). No cases of severe hemorrhage (Hb fall >2 g/dl) or perforation occurred. During a mean follow-up period of 34 +/- 10 months, metachronous intraepithelial high-grade neoplasms or early adenocarcinomas were seen in 11/48 patients (23 %), who received further successful endoscopic treatment. Four patients died during the follow-up period, but in only one patient was this due to his Barrett's adenocarcinoma (this was the patient who underwent esophageal resection). CONCLUSIONS: The malignant potential of short-segment Barrett's esophagus must not be underestimated. Organ-preserving local endoscopic treatment shows good acute-phase and long-term results. Local endoscopic treatment represents an alternative to esophageal resection in the case of intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and selected early adenocarcinomas in Barrett's esophagus.     

早期结直肠癌及癌前病变患者经内镜下黏膜切除术与黏膜剥离术治疗的疗效比较

目的比较内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)与内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)在结直肠癌前病变与早期癌患者中的应用效果。方法选取2010年1月-2015年1月该院收治的116例早期结直肠癌患者与结直肠腺瘤患者为研究对象。其中,61例患者采用EMR治疗,为EMR组,55例采用ESD治疗,为ESD组。比较EMR与ESD在结直肠癌前病变与早期癌患者中的应用效果。结果 EMR组患者的手术时间明显短于ESD组患者,两组患者的病理情况、异型增生程度的差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。ESD组病变最大径≥2 cm的整块切除和病变最大径≥2 cm的组织治愈性切除的患者明显多于EMR组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。ESD组病变最大直径≥2 cm的患者明显多于EMR组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。EMR组和ESD组患者并发症总发生率分别为6.56%和23.63%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。EMR组和ESD组患者的复发率分别为5(8.20%)例和3(5.45%)例,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。ESD术后出现并发症的危险因素为操作经验和病变大小(P0.05)。结论 ESD术和EMR术均能较好的整块切除病变最大径≥2 cm的早期结直肠癌与结直肠腺瘤,术后复发率较低。ESD术相对于EMR术更适合较大的病变,但术后复发率较高,且手术医师的操作经验和病变大小为ESD术后发生并发症的危险因素,应加强监测。     

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual/local recurrence of early gastric cancer after endoscopic mucosal resection

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a widely accepted treatment for early gastric cancer; however, incomplete resection with residual local disease and recurrences continues to be a difficult problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual/local recurrent early gastric cancer lesions after EMR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The en bloc resection rate, histologically complete resection rate, complications, and local recurrence were assessed in 15 patients who underwent ESD for residual/local recurrent early gastric cancer lesions after EMR. RESULTS: The nonlifting sign after injection of a glycerin solution was positive due to scar formation in all cases. En bloc resection was attempted in all cases, with a complete resection rate of 93.3 % (14 of 15). The lesion was completely resected with histologically adequate margins in the 14 patients who received complete en bloc resection. The average operation time was 85.4 +/- 52.9 min, and the mean follow-up period for all patients was 18.1 +/- 7.4 months. Major bleeding during the procedure in one case was the only complication (one of 15, 6.7 %). None of the patients experienced recurrence of early gastric cancer after ESD. CONCLUSIONS: ESD appears to be a safe and effective treatment for residual/local recurrent early gastric cancer lesions after EMR, and it is useful for histological confirmation of successful treatment.     

Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and January 2002, 50 patients (35 men, 15 women) were treated by EMR for 52 sessile polyps. The median size of the polyps was 27.5 mm (range 10-60). The "lift and cut" EMR technique was used. If the lesion was poorly differentiated or infiltrated the muscularis mucosae to more than 1000 microm, the patient was referred for colectomy. In the other cases, follow-up was proposed. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 9.6 % of cases and were always treated conservatively. The rate of endoscopically complete resection was judged to be 98.1 %. Argon plasma coagulation was applied to the margins of the lesion in 21.6 % of cases. Histological examination showed 38 HGDs and 14 carcinomas. Seven patients had a lesion reaching the deep or lateral margin; four were referred for surgery; two patients for whom surgery would have been high risk were followed up, and both developed local recurrence; and one patient was followed up, without recurrence, because infiltration was less than 1000 microm. A total of 43 patients were followed up after complete excision. Two patients died during follow-up; neither death could be reliably attributed to colorectal carcinoma. Seven patients were lost during the follow-up. For 34 patients, information from a mean follow-up of 17.3 months (6 - 57) was available and recurrence was observed in five cases (15 %). CONCLUSIONS: EMR appears to be a safe and efficient treatment of HGD and early colorectal cancer. However, correct analysis of submucosal infiltration is essential to assess the completeness of the resection.     

Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been established for early lesions in Barrett's esophagus. However, the remaining Barrett's esophagus epithelium remains at risk of developing further lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of circumferential endoscopic mucosectomy (circumferential EMR)s in removing not only the index lesion (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or mucosal cancer), but also the remaining Barrett's esophagus epithelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients were included in the study (11 men, 10 women), who had Barrett's esophagus and either HGIN (n = 12) or mucosal cancer (n = 9). Of the patients, 17/21 were at high surgical risk and five had refused surgery. On the basis of preprocedure endosonography their lesions were classified as T1N0 (n = 19) or T0N0 (n = 2). The lesions and the Barrett's esophagus epithelium were removed by polypectomy after submucosal injection of 10-15 ml of saline; a double-channel endoscope was used in 15/21 cases. Circumferential EMR was performed in two sessions, the lesion and the surrounding half of the circumferential Barrett's esophagus mucosa being removed in the first session. In order to prevent the formation of esophageal stenosis, the second half of the Barrett's esophagus mucosa was resected 1 month later. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 4/21 patients (19 %), consisting of bleeding which was successfully managed by endoscopic hemostasis in all cases. No strictures were observed during follow-up (mean duration 18 months) and endoscopic resection was considered complete in 18/21 patients (86 %). For three patients, histological examination showed incomplete removal of tumor: one of these underwent surgery; two received chemoradiotherapy, and showed no evidence of residual tumor at 18 months' and 24 months' follow-up, respectively. Two patients in whom resection was initially classified as complete later presented with local recurrence and were treated again by EMR. Barrett's esophagus mucosa was completely replaced by squamous cell epithelium in 15/20 patients (75 %). CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential EMR is a noninvasive treatment of Barrett's esophagus with HGIN or mucosal cancer, with a low complication rate and good short-term clinical efficacy. Further studies should focus on long-term results and on technical improvements.     

What are the appropriate indications for endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer? Analysis of 256 endoscopically resected lesions

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer (EGC) without ulceration or scarring has been very popular in Japan and thought to be beneficial, curability by EMR is still lower than that for surgical resection. We investigated patients whose EGCs were resected endoscopically in order to identify the factors affecting curability by EMR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated retrospectively 256 EGC lesions (251 patients) which were subjected to EMR between 1989 and 1998 with respect to patient profile, macroscopic type, location, maximum diameter of tumors, resection method and histological typing. The prognoses of the patients were also investigated as far as possible. RESULTS: The curative total resection rate for EMR of EGC was 74.2 %. Concerning the factors affecting curability, the size of the lesion (over 15 mm), the method of resection (divisional resection), and histological typing (poorly differentiated) had a statistically significant effect on the complete resection rate. Multivariate analysis of the factors confirmed these results. Submucosal invasion was suspected in 16 patients after EMR, but submucosal cancer was found in only one patient after further surgery. Where there was recurrence, the longest recurrence-free period after EMR of EGC was 48 months, whereas the mean recurrence-free period was 195.4 days. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate indication for EMR for EGC is thought to be an intramucosal differentiated-type adenocarcinoma without ulceration or scarring, and no more than 15 mm in size regardless of macroscopic type. Periodic follow-up for at least 5 years is necessary.     

New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: For one-piece resection the conventional technique of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is limited to gastric mucosal tumors of 10 mm or less in size. In this retrospective study, we investigated the efficacy and complications associated with a new EMR method, using an insulated-tip diathermic knife (IT-EMR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a total of 41 patients gastric mucosal tumors were resected using IT-EMR. Results: One-piece resection rates were 82% (14/17) for lesions of 10 mm or less, 75% (12/16) for those between 11 and 20 mm, and 14% (1/7) for those of over 20 mm. Complication rates for severe bleeding and perforation were 22% and 5%, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 32 months, no recurrence was observed after these procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional EMR, this new method may have significant benefits, particularly regarding one-piece resection of lesions between 11 and 20 mm in size, and may also have a lower recurrence rate.     

Head and neck cancer arising after endoscopic mucosal resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: It is well known that patients with head and neck cancer often have synchronous or metachronous squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. However, the prevalence of subsequent head and neck cancer in patients with early-stage esophageal cancer is still unknown. The aims of this study were to analyze the frequency of metachronous head and neck cancer after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for esophageal cancer and to investigate whether minute iodine-unstained areas, often associated with squamous cell carcinomas, would be an index for metachronous head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 99 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent EMR were studied. Based on the iodine-staining pattern at initial EMR, they were categorized into those with uniform (group U) and scattered (group S) types of background mucosa. Patients were monitored endoscopically and otolaryngologically (group U, median 46 months, range 12-83 months; group S, median 44 months, range 13-80 months). RESULTS: In total, 5/99 patients (5.1 %) were found to have metachronous head and neck cancer during the follow-up, including 4/20 patients (20 %) in group S. In three cases laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer was found by endoscopic examination. The cumulative proportion of metachronous head and neck cancer-free subjects was significantly lower in group S than group U (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who undergo EMR for esophageal carcinoma, those with scattered-type iodine staining of the background mucosa have an increased risk of metachronous head and neck cancer, and should therefore be closely observed. Careful endoscopic observation led to early detection of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.     

Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of gastric carcinoid tumors

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastric carcinoid tumors are a rare disease. Previously, total gastrectomy was regarded as the treatment of choice. However, differences in biological malignancy have recently led to the increased use of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for treatment. We studied the outcome of EMR in patients with gastric carcinoids who were treated at our hospital and discuss the indications for endoscopic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1986 and 1999 we carried out gastric mucosal resection in five patients with gastric carcinoid tumors. The procedure used for EMR was either strip biopsy or endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy. RESULTS: The carcinoid tumors measured 10 mm or less in four of the five patients. Two patients had type A gastritis, and all had hypergastrinemia. There was no evidence of recurrence during follow-up (range 6 - 66 months; mean 32.6 months). CONCLUSION: EMR is useful in the management of type 1 gastric carcinoids as classified by Rindi (hypergastrinemia; tumor diameter of 10 mm or less).     

Meta-analysis comparing differing methods of endoscopic therapy for colorectal lesions

AIM: To compare the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colorectal lesions. METHODS: An electronic systematic literature search of four computerized databases was performed in July 2014 identifying studies reporting the outcomes of colorectal ESD and EMR. The primary outcome measures were en-bloc resection rate, endoscopic clearance rate and lesion recurrence rate of the patients followed up. The secondary outcome was the complication rate (including bleeding, perforation and surgery post EMR or ESD rate). Statistical pooling and random effects modelling of the studies calculating risk difference, heterogeneity and assessment of bias and quality were performed. RESULTS: Six observational studies reporting the outcomes of 1324 procedures were included. The en-bloc resection rate was 50% higher in the ESD group than in the EMR group (95%CI: 0.17-0.83, P < 0.0001, I² = 99.7%). Endoscopic clearance rates were also significantly higher in the ESD group (95%CI: -0.06-0.02, P < 0.0001, I² = 92.5%). The perforation rate was 7% higher in the ESD group than the EMR group (95%CI: 0.05-0.09, P > 0.05, I² = 41.1%) and the rate of recurrence was 50% higher in the EMR group than in the ESD group (95%CI: 0.20-0.79, P < 0.001, I² = 99.5%). Heterogeneity remained consistent when subgroup analysis of high quality studies was performed (with the exception of piecemeal resection rate), and overall effect sizes remained unchanged for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: ESD demonstrates higher en-bloc resection rates and lower recurrence rates compared to colorectal EMR. Differences in outcomes may benefit from increased assessment through well-designed comparative studies.     

小于1.0?cm的直肠类癌内镜治疗方法探讨

目的探讨不同内镜治疗方法治疗较小(病变大小≤1.0cm)直肠类癌的优缺点。方法回顾性分析2010年1月-2017年12月该院经肠镜检查且病理明确诊断为直肠类癌(病变大小≤1.0 cm)的患者49例,对患者的内镜临床资料进行回顾性分析,根据治疗方法不同分3组,内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)组、内镜下套扎切除术(EMR-L)组和内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)组,以年龄、性别、病变大小、手术时间、并发症(出血、穿孔、感染)和完整切除率等指标为变量进行统计学分析,探讨3种治疗方法的优缺点。结果该研究共纳入49例小于1.0 cm直肠类癌,其中EMR组22例(44.90%),EMR-L组20例(40.82%),ESD组7例(14.28%),3种治疗方法年龄、性别和病变大小比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。ESD术操作时间较EMR和EMR-L术操作时间长(均值1916.14、96.36和120.25 s,P 0.05),EMR术完整切除率较EMR-L和ESD术完整切除率低(72.73%、95.00%和100.00%,P 0.05),EMR-L组1例发生术中穿孔,经内镜下治疗后好转出院,EMR组2例发生术后出血,经内镜下止血治疗好转出院。入组病例均未发生复发、转移。结论 EMR-L治疗小于1.0 cm直肠类癌操作相对于ESD术简单,完整切除率较EMR术高,创伤小、术后处理简单、并发症少。     

Risk factors for local recurrence of rectal carcinoma

The impact of distal resection margins and the mode of operation on pelvic recurrence rate was assessed in 331 cases following abdomino-perineal resection (APR; n = 134), and anterior resection (AR; n = 197) for rectal cancer. Local recurrence was observed in 55 cases (16.6%) after a median interval of 16 months. Only 20 of 212 patients (9.4%) without positive lymph nodes developed a local recurrence, but 35 of 119 (29.4%) with nodal involvement. The recurrence rate was 33% (10/30) in cases with local spread to adjacent structures (T4), and 15% in cases with less extensive penetration. Of 59 poorly differentiated cancers 15 developed pelvic failure (25%), as opposed to 40 of 272 (14.7%) well or moderately differentiated tumours. 17.7% developed local recurrence after AR, and 14.9% after APR. The recurrence rate following AR was 30% in 33 cases with resection margins less than or equal to 10 mm and 17.4% in 115 cases with margins from 11 to 40 mm, and 10% in 49 cases with wider margins. Cox's multiple proportional hazards regression revealed that nodal involvement (p = 0.0003), local invasion (p = 0.0055), poor differentiation (p = 0.066), and AR vs. APR (p = 0.099) were independent risk factors for pelvic failure. For the AR cases the factors were nodal involvement (p less than 0.0001), local invasion (p = 0.0043), and a resection margin less than or equal to 25 mm on the fixed specimen (p = 0.0039). For patients with negative lymph nodes local invasion was the only independent risk factor, whereas the variables "anterior resection" and narrow resection margin were significant only in node positive cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): results and prognostic factors in 21 patients

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic mucosectomy (EM), and to present our experience with the endoscopic removal of superficial tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients were included in the study (16 men, 5 women), between September 1995 and May 1997. In 16 cases the site of the lesions was an esophageal carcinoma, in two cases a gastric carcinoma, and in three cases a sessile polyp of the duodenum with severe dysplasia. Surgery was not recommended for the patients with esophageal or gastric tumors (on account of cardiac disease, cirrhosis or poor health). All patients underwent an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examination. The lesions were classified as usT1N0 in 20 cases, and usT0N0 in one case, according to the pretreatment EUS findings. We used the technique of polypectomy after submucosal injection of 10-15 ml of saline serum. RESULTS: Complications were encountered in 2/21 patients (9.5 %). Bleeding occurred in one case, but hemostasis was achieved endoscopically. In the other case, the patient presented with a thoracic pain and was treated by morphine injection. Endoscopic resection was considered to be complete in 19/21 patients (90.4%). In the other two cases, both involving esophageal tumors, histologic examination indicated only a partial tumor removal. However, these two patients had survived with negative EUS and endoscopic biopsy findings at 18 and 22 months later, respectively. None of the patients whose resections were considered complete presented with local recurrence, but three patients developed another superficial esophageal cancer, which was also treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The mean follow-up was 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: EMR is a safe and efficient treatment of early gastrointestinal tumors. The development of high-frequency EUS probes may further improve the results of this technique in the future.     

"Salvage" endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon using a retroflexion gastroscope dissection technique: a prospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection can provide curative endoscopic therapy for Paris type I/II adenomas and node-negative early cancer. No studies have addressed the technical feasibility of retroflexion endoscopic dissection methods for luminal "salvage" therapy in patients considered unresectable using conventional forward-viewing resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Colonoscopy using an Olympus GIF-XQ240 gastroscope was carried out in 76 patients with Paris type I/II adenomas, early colorectal cancer (CRC), or laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) when the index endoscopist considered the lesion to be unresectable due to retrograde fold involvement. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and submucosal dissection were carried out using a complete retroflexion technique. Endoscopic and miniprobe 20-MHz or 12.5-MHz ultrasound follow-up data were collected prospectively up to 24 months after the index resection. RESULTS: Cecal intubation or cannulation to the neoterminal ileum was achieved in 76 (100 %) cases. Forty lesions (53 %) were classified in accordance with the Paris criteria as Is; 16 (21 %) as type II; 10 (13.5 %) as LST-G; and 10 (13.5 %) as LST-NG. Eight lesions (10 %) were excluded from EMR on the basis of endoscopic ultrasound criteria, with 68 of the 76 lesions (89 %) meeting the criteria for endoluminal resection. The median intubation time was 16 min (range 3-32 min). The median resection times were 98 min (range 30 - 242 min), 36 min (range 10-60 min), 172 min (range 20 - 240 min), and 60 min (range 10-116 min) for Paris Is, II, LST-G, and LST-NG lesions, respectively. LST-G morphology was associated with a high median submucosal injection volume in comparison with all other Paris types ( P < 0.05) and with a prolonged resection time ( P < 0.01). Sixty-one patients (94 %) completed the surveillance protocol. Higaki recurrence criteria were met in seven patients (11 %), with six undergoing successful adjunctive endoluminal resection. After 24 months of follow-up, the "cure" rate with endoscopic resection was 60 out of 61 (98 %). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study to address the safety and medium-term efficacy of retroflexion endoscopic resection in the colon. When appropriate exclusion criteria are applied, selected patients can receive curative resection using the retroflexion technique. "Salvage" endoluminal therapy may therefore be possible in such cases when surgical resection would otherwise have been required.     

Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading rectal tumors

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: We undertook this retrospective study to evaluate the frequency and prognosis of endoscopic treatment of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in the rectum. The recurrence rate for lesions of the lower rectum was compared with that of the upper rectum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the period from July 1989 to June 2002, a total of 1237 rectal tumors were detected. LSTs accounted for 6.9 % (85/1237) of all rectal tumors. A total of 224 tumors of the lower rectum were detected among the 1237 rectal tumors. LSTs accounted for 16.1 % (36/224) of all the lower rectal tumors. From 85 LST lesions, 67 were evaluated for their prognosis after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Patients whose LSTs had been resected were followed up by endoscopy at the following frequencies: once 15 (22.4 %); twice (more than 1 year), 20 (29.9 %); three times (more than 3 years), 21(31.3 %); and four times or more (more than 5 years), 11 (16.4 %). RESULTS: A total of 67 patients with endoscopically treated LSTs were followed up by endoscopy. We observed recurrences in two lesions of the upper rectum (2/38, 5.3 %) and five lesions of the lower rectum (5/29, 17.2 %) (P = 0.2364); all seven lesions were resected piecemeal. LSTs whose horizontal margin reached the pectinate line frequently recurred in the lower rectum, at a rate of 80 % (4/5). However, all patients were completely cured by additional endoscopic resections, the greatest number of treatments being four. CONCLUSION: For early detection of recurrence and successful endoscopic cure, further colonoscopic examination within a few months after the first treatment is necessary.     

Characteristics of metachronous multiple early gastric cancers after endoscopic mucosal resection

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early gastric cancer is a minimally invasive procedure. The incidence and characteristics of metachronous multiple gastric cancers were investigated in a retrospective study in patients with early gastric cancer after EMR treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 143 patients with early gastric cancer who had undergone EMR treatment were periodically followed up with endoscopic examinations for 24 months or longer. RESULTS: The median period of endoscopic follow-up was 57 months (range 24 - 157 months). None of the patients died of gastric cancer, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Five patients died of other diseases. Of 20 patients (14 %) with metachronous multiple gastric cancers, 15 were treated by EMR. One patient with differentiated submucosal cancer and four with undifferentiated cancers underwent surgery. Sixteen patients (11 %) had synchronous multiple early gastric cancer lesions within 1 year of the initial EMR. About half of the multiple lesions were located in the same third of the stomach as the primary lesion, and most lesions were similar in macroscopic type to the primary lesions. Most multiple lesions were of the differentiated type. CONCLUSIONS: Annual endoscopic examinations can preserve the whole stomach in most patients with early gastric cancer after successful EMR.     

Hemodynamic analysis of esophageal varices using color Doppler endoscopic ultrasonography to predict recurrence after endoscopic treatment

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The time to recurrence of esophageal varices may vary greatly between patients even after the same endoscopic therapy. To clarify the factors which contribute to recurrence after endoscopic treatment, the hemodynamics and morphology of the left gastric vein (LGV) were investigated using color Doppler endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients with high-risk esophageal varices underwent color Doppler-EUS before receiving endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy combined therapy. Endoscopic examination was performed every 3 months after the treatment to evaluate recurrence of varices. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients responded to the therapy, while 13 patients did not respond, and had recurrence within 12 months. The hepatofugal flow velocity in the LGV trunk was significantly lower in the responders (9.9 vs. 13.9 cm/sec; P = 0.02). The branch pattern of the LGV was categorized into three groups: anterior branch dominant, posterior branch dominant, and no-dominant type. The incidence of the anterior branch dominant type was significantly less in responders (17 vs. 70 %; P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the LGV trunk diameter and the size of the paraesophageal vein between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for recurrence can be analyzed in detail using color Doppler-EUS. Further investigation using color Doppler-EUS may enable us to select the optimal way to treat esophageal varices to prevent recurrence.     

Endoluminal loco-regional resection by TEM after R1 endoscopic removal or recurrence of rectal tumors

Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) after R1 endoscopic resection or local recurrence of early rectal cancer after operative endoscopy. Material and methods Twenty patients with early rectal cancer were enrolled, including patients with incomplete endoscopic resection, or complete endoscopic resection of a tumor with unfavorable prognostic factors (group A, ten patients), and local recurrence after endoscopic removal (group B, ten patients). At admission, histology after endoscopic polypectomy was: TisR1(4), T1R0G3(1), T1R1(5) in group A, and TisR0(8), T1R0(2) in group B. All patients underwent ELRR by TEM with nucleotide-guided mesorectal excision (NGME). Results Mean operative time was 150?minutes. Complications occurred in two patients (10%). Definitive histology was: moderate dysplasia(4), pT0N0(3), pTisN0(5), pT1N0(6), pT2N0(2). Mean number of lymph-nodes was 3.1. Mean follow-up was 79.5 months. All patients are alive and disease-free. Conclusions ELRR by TEM after R1 endoscopic resection of early rectal cancer or for local recurrence after operative endoscopy is safe and effective. It may be considered as a diagnostic procedure, as well as a curative treatment option, instead of a more invasive TME.