Intracoronary infusion of streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Effects of reperfusion on left ventricular performance

Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography were performed on hospital admission in 32 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Twenty-six patients had total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery and six had severe proximal stenosis with poor distal flow. In 18 of the 26 patients with total occlusion, intracoronary infusion of Streptokinase resulted in reperfusion of the distal coronary artery. Seventeen of these 18 patients had severe coronary arterial stenosis at the site of the previous total occlusion. Hemodynamic indexes of left ventricular performance and ejection fraction determined by gated cardiac blood pool imaging did not change immediately after reperfusion (p [probability]= not significant [NS]). The mean (± standard deviation) left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly (p = 0.007) from admission (44 ± 15 percent) to hospital discharge (55 ± 7 percent) in patients evidencing reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery. It did not change (p = NS) in this time span in the patients with severe stenosis alone, in those with total occlusion not demonstrating reperfusion after administration of streptokinase or in an additional 10 control patients with acute myocardial infarction not evaluated with coronary angiography. These data suggest that (1) coronary arterial thrombus is frequent in acute myocardial infarction and can be lysed by intracoronary streptokinase; (2) reperfusion with intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction results in improved left ventricular performance between admission and hospital discharge.     

Reperfusion arrhythmias are rare during acute myocardial infarction and thrombolysis in man

Coronary arterial reperfusion is commonly associated, in anaesthetized animals, with severe arrhythmias, but the clinical relevance of this model remains uncertain. Continuous electrocardiographic ST-segment recording was performed immediately from admission in 38 patients who presented within six (mean 2.5) hours of the onset of acute myocardial infarction and had emergency coronary arteriography and thrombolysis with intracoronary streptokinase. All patients received high doses of isosorbide dinitrate but no prophylactic anti-arrhythmic drugs. In 19 patients, 36 occurrences of intermittent reperfusion were observed. Stable reperfusion was achieved in 32 patients. Only 14 episodes of arrhythmia (11 ventricular) were observed in 6 patients within five minutes of transient or stable reperfusion. No episodes of arrhythmia were documented within five minutes of the other 57 occurrences of reperfusion. In contrast, 215 episodes of arrhythmia (198 ventricular) not associated with reperfusion were recorded in 32 patients. Arrhythmias are commonly observed in patients during evolving acute myocardial infarction and thrombolysis but are an insensitive and rarely specific marker of reperfusion at the time when this occurs.     

Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after intracoronary thrombolysis for evolving myocardial infarction.

Sixteen patients underwent emergency coronary artery bypass surgery immediately after intracoronary streptokinase infusion for acute evolving myocardial infarction. Of these, 11 patients had 70% residual stenosis in the recanalised vessel, and in five thrombolysis was unsuccessful. There were no hospital deaths. All the patients sustained myocardial necrosis, the peak activity of creatine phosphokinase correlating with the time to reperfusion. Chest tube drainage (mean 960 ml) was significantly higher than for control patients but did not correlate with the total dosage of streptokinase. No patients had further myocardial infarction or developed recurrent angina. Selected patients may benefit from coronary bypass surgery after intracoronary streptokinase infusion. If necessary this may be performed immediately with low mortality and morbidity.     

Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after intracoronary thrombolysis for evolving myocardial infarction

Sixteen patients underwent emergency coronary artery bypass surgery immediately after intracoronary streptokinase infusion for acute evolving myocardial infarction. Of these, 11 patients had 70% residual stenosis in the recanalised vessel, and in five thrombolysis was unsuccessful. There were no hospital deaths. All the patients sustained myocardial necrosis, the peak activity of creatine phosphokinase correlating with the time to reperfusion. Chest tube drainage (mean 960 ml) was significantly higher than for control patients but did not correlate with the total dosage of streptokinase. No patients had further myocardial infarction or developed recurrent angina. Selected patients may benefit from coronary bypass surgery after intracoronary streptokinase infusion. If necessary this may be performed immediately with low mortality and morbidity.     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization: Procedure,results, and acute complications

Percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization, a new therapeutic procedure used in acute myocardial infarction, offers significant reduction in mortality, as well as more effective limitation of the zone of infarction than has been possible with other pharmacologic treatment employed in the past. The risk of coronary angiography during acute myocardial infarction was surprisingly low, as was the risk of hemorrhagic complications following the intracoronary administration of relatively low doses of thrombolytic substances such as streptokinase. Mechanical recanalization was possible in about one fifth of patients and successful in approximately half of all such attempts, but complications occurred in a small percentage of attempts at this step. Coronary artery spasm was excluded as a possible cause of occlusion in almost all cases. Selective intracoronary infusion of streptokinase produced the highest degree of myocardial reperfusion, and best results were achieved when therapy was initiated shortly after thrombotic occlusion occurred. Residual stenosis of more than 75% luminal diameter narrowing was present in approximately three fourths of cases after complete thrombolysis, and the majority of patients remained appropriate candidates for coronary bypass surgery or for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (Grüntzig procedure). Although complete analysis of the efficacy of selective recanalization was difficult because it was not possible to establish a suitable control group for purposes of comparison, the mortality of less than 1% in the present group of 232 patients within the first 6 hours following myocardial reperfusion provides an encouraging result.     

Comparison of intravenous anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex and intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

Coronary angiography was used to compare the efficacy of anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) administered intravenously and streptokinase given by intracoronary infusion in inducing reperfusion in patients with a proven acute myocardial infarction. Forty-two patients received 30 U of APSAC intravenously over 5 minutes and 43 patients received 250,000 IU of streptokinase given via intracoronary infusion over 90 minutes, after occlusion of the infarct-related vessel was demonstrated by angiography. Reperfusion was achieved in 23 (64%) of 36 patients (mean time to reperfusion 46 minutes) treated with APSAC and 25 (67%) of 37 patients (mean time to reperfusion 45 minutes) treated with intracoronary streptokinase, who were angiographically evaluated 90 minutes after the start of treatment. Twenty-four hours after treatment, reocclusion had occurred in 1 (5%) of 22 patients in the APSAC group and in 3 (13%) of 23 patients in the streptokinase group. No major bleeding was observed in either treatment group despite a similar systemic lytic state that lasted for up to 48 hours. Two patients treated with APSAC died after severe left ventricular failure unrelated to therapy. The results indicate that APSAC given intravenously is as effective as streptokinase given intracoronary in producing thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. The major advantages of APSAC are its rapid and convenient administration by a single intravenous injection, the low rate of arterial reocclusion and good patient tolerance.     

Combination therapy for evolving myocardial infarction: Intracoronary thrombolysis and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

Nonsurgical coronary reperfusion for evolving myocardial infarction is a promising new technique for the salvage of jeopardized myocardium. Successful reperfusion can be established by intracoronary infusion of streptokinase in approximately 75 percent of patients within the first 6 hours of transmural infarction [1,2]. Following recanalization, most patients are left with high grade fixed coronary stenoses which are potential sites for recurrent thrombus formation. Since the underlying site for coronary thrombosis is still present, reocclusion may occur. Indeed, early experience suggests that recurrence of thrombosis is not uncommon [3,4]. Therapy for evolving myocardial infarction should, in some patients, involve not only thrombolysis, but also an attack on the fixed coronary lesion. We describe a patient with evolving myocardial infarction who was treated successfully with combination therapy consisting of intracoronary streptokinase followed by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [5].     

Efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization utilizing streptokinase thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Since coronary thrombosis is a principal factor in the evolving necrotic process in the majority of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a prospective study was conducted in 25 AMI patients who underwent expeditious coronary arteriography. Of these patients, 22 with totally occluding thrombus also received early streptokinase (STK) administration. STK was given by intracoronary (20 patients) or systemic (two patients) infusion, 2000 to 50,000 IU/min, to a total dose of 125,000 to 500,000 IU within 10 hours of AMI symptom onset. Eighteen patients had angiographically visualized successful coronary thrombolysis; the shorter the interval between onset of symptoms to treatment, the more rapid was the clot dissolution. Successful thrombolysis occurred concomitantly with readily managed reperfusion ventricular tachyarrhythmias in nearly all patients. In addition, STK recanalization resulted in relief of ongoing chest pain in 10 of 12 patients, 10 of 16 evidenced immediate normalization of hyperacute ST segment abnormalities, and 8 of 14 demonstrated subsequent improvement of angiographically visualized left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. In the percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization (PTCR) procedure, the step of using a soft-tipped guide wire itself was transiently useful in only one of seven patients in whom this was attempted; reocclusion took place without added STK therapy. Nitroglycerin (NTG) alone produced only slight distal patency in but 1 of 19 patients with coronary occlusion given the nitrate. Importantly, in 14 control AMI patients receiving conventional treatment without STK, 10 showed angiographically complete occlusion of the coronary artery supplying the infarct region 1 month after infarction, thereby excluding spontaneous clot lysis mimicking STK-PTCR-induced reperfusion. These data support the concept that coronary occlusion by thrombosis is inherently involved with AMI and that rapid PTCR application of intracoronary STK provides potent thrombolysis, superior to that provided by NTG and guide wire passage in reestablishing coronary flow with attendant salvage of jeopardized myocardium and with subsequently improved LV function.     

Quantitative coronary angiography during intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: how long to continue thrombolytic therapy?

An intracoronary infusion of streptokinase is often administered in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To address the question of how long intracoronary streptokinase should be infused, we studied 13 patients with symptoms and electrocardiographic findings suggesting an evolving myocardial infarction. We used subselective catheterization techniques and made quantitative angiographic measurements of the percentage of reduction of coronary artery (CA) diameter before intracoronary streptokinase therapy, immediately after reperfusion was established, and at the completion of streptokinase infusion. Before intracoronary streptokinase and after intracoronary nitroglycerin, nine patients had 100% obstruction of the CA in the "infarct-related vessel." In seven patients reperfusion was established (25 +/- 21 min, mean +/- SD) at which time CA diameter was reduced by 77 +/- 22%. The streptokinase infusion was then continued until repeated films (every 10 to 15 min) suggested no further change at the site of CA obstruction (93 +/- 68 min). The percentage of CA diameter reduction when streptokinase infusion was discontinued was 55 +/- 32%; this value was less (P less than 0.05) than that observed early after reperfusion. These data show that after initial reperfusion was achieved by the use of intracoronary streptokinase, additional streptokinase lessened the reduction of CA diameter. Residual thrombus may be present at the narrowed CA site early after reperfusion, and further "cleanup" can be achieved by prolonging streptokinase infusion.     

Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmias for patency of the infarct-related coronary artery after thrombolytic therapy

In animal studies reperfusion of coronary arteries is commonly accompanied by ventricular arrhythmias. It is not certain, however, whether ventricular arrhythmias can be used as a reliable non-invasive marker of reperfusion in humans. Two-channel Holter recordings were obtained from the start of an intravenous infusion of streptokinase until coronary angiography (2.8 (2.7) hours (mean SD)) afterwards) in 57 patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than four hours who were generally not treated with antiarrhythmic drugs. Ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 21 (37%) of the 57 patients: accelerated idioventricular rhythm in 13 patients and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 15 patients. Seven patients had both accelerated idioventricular rhythm and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Coronary angiography showed a patent infarct-related vessel in 12 (92%) of the 13 patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm (95% confidence interval 66 to 99%), in 22 (50%) of the 44 patients without accelerated idioventricular rhythm (95% CI 34 to 66%), in 11 (73%) of the 15 patients with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (95% CI 45 to 92%), and in 23 (55%) (95% CI 39 to 71%) of the 42 patients who did not have non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Seventeen (81%) of the 21 patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm, or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, or both, had a patent infarct-related vessel (95% CI 58 to 94%) as did 17 (47%) of the 36 patients with no ventricular arrhythmia (95% CI 29 to 65%). In patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm after thrombolysis the infarct-related vessel is almost certain to be patent; but the infarct-related coronary artery can still be patent when no arrhythmia is seen.     

Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmias for patency of the infarct-related coronary artery after thrombolytic therapy.

In animal studies reperfusion of coronary arteries is commonly accompanied by ventricular arrhythmias. It is not certain, however, whether ventricular arrhythmias can be used as a reliable non-invasive marker of reperfusion in humans. Two-channel Holter recordings were obtained from the start of an intravenous infusion of streptokinase until coronary angiography (2.8 (2.7) hours (mean SD)) afterwards) in 57 patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than four hours who were generally not treated with antiarrhythmic drugs. Ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 21 (37%) of the 57 patients: accelerated idioventricular rhythm in 13 patients and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 15 patients. Seven patients had both accelerated idioventricular rhythm and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Coronary angiography showed a patent infarct-related vessel in 12 (92%) of the 13 patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm (95% confidence interval 66 to 99%), in 22 (50%) of the 44 patients without accelerated idioventricular rhythm (95% CI 34 to 66%), in 11 (73%) of the 15 patients with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (95% CI 45 to 92%), and in 23 (55%) (95% CI 39 to 71%) of the 42 patients who did not have non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Seventeen (81%) of the 21 patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm, or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, or both, had a patent infarct-related vessel (95% CI 58 to 94%) as did 17 (47%) of the 36 patients with no ventricular arrhythmia (95% CI 29 to 65%). In patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm after thrombolysis the infarct-related vessel is almost certain to be patent; but the infarct-related coronary artery can still be patent when no arrhythmia is seen.     

Reperfusion arrhythmias: are they only a marker of epicardial reperfusion or continuing myocardial ischemia after acute myocardial infarction?

Reperfusion arrhythmias are associated with epicardial reperfusion but may also be a sign of vascular reperfusion injury which can be seen as no-reflow phenomenon on coronary angiography and predicts in-hospital complications and recovery of left ventricular (LV) function. No-reflow phenomenon (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] 相似文献   

Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Review of clinical trials

Intracoronary infusion of streptokinase is associated with recanalization rates of 60 to 90% immediately after the procedure. Mortality data in published trials are conflicting. In 125 registry patients who had paired contrast ventriculograms before streptokinase infusion and hospital discharge, improvement in ejection fraction correlated with incomplete coronary obstruction before angiography, the presence of collateral vessels to the infarct area and recanalization of complete obstruction. In assessing the risk/benefit ratio of intracoronary streptokinase infusion, the risks of angiography in the setting of acute myocardial infarction, reocclusion, bleeding and such secondary interventions as angioplasty or bypass surgery must be considered. Intravenous infusion of conventional doses of streptokinase was associated with improved survival in some trials in which therapy began within 12 hours after the onset of infarction. Immediate recanalization rates in patients who received large doses of intravenous streptokinase were lower than those associated with intracoronary streptokinase infusion. The risks and benefits of high-dose intravenous streptokinase administration must still be assessed.     

Prevention of subsequent exercise-induced periinfarct ischemia by emergency coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: comparison with intracoronary streptokinase

To compare the efficacy of emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and intracoronary streptokinase in preventing exercise-induced periinfarct ischemia, 28 patients presenting within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction were prospectively randomized. Of these, 14 patients were treated with emergency angioplasty and 14 patients received intracoronary streptokinase. Recatheterization and submaximal exercise thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography were performed before hospital discharge. Periinfarct ischemia was defined as a reversible thallium defect adjacent to a fixed defect assessed qualitatively. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 86% of patients treated with emergency angioplasty and 86% of patients treated with intracoronary streptokinase (p = NS). Residual stenosis of the infarct-related coronary artery shown at predischarge angiography was 43.8 +/- 31.4% for the angioplasty group and 75.0 +/- 15.6% for the streptokinase group (p less than 0.05). Of the angioplasty group, 9% developed exercise-induced periinfarct ischemia compared with 60% of the streptokinase group (p less than 0.05). Thus, patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with emergency angioplasty had significantly less severe residual coronary stenosis and exercise-induced periinfarct ischemia than did those treated with intracoronary streptokinase. These results suggest further application of coronary angioplasty in the management of acute myocardial infarction.     

Exercise 2-dimensional echocardiography. Quantitation of left ventricular performance in patients with severe angina pectoris

Although intracoronary thrombus formation plays a major role in acute transmural myocardial infarction (MI), its occurrence in unstable angina (UA) and nontransmural MI has not clearly been established. To determine whether intracoronary thrombus does occur in these syndromes, coronary arteriography was performed before, during, and after intracoronary nitroglycerin and streptokinase infusion in 17 patients. None of the 8 patients with nontransmural MI and 1 of the 9 patients with UA responded to intracoronary nitroglycerin. Seven of 8 patients with nontransmural MI and 4 of 9 patients with UA responded to streptokinase infusion with opening of an occluded vessel, an increase in stenotic diameter, dissolution of an intracoronary filling defect, or a combination of these. Serial opening and closing of ischemia-related vessels occurred spontaneously and in response to streptokinase in some patients in whom thrombolysis was demonstrated. Evidence of thrombolysis was not seen in any patient studied longer than 1 week from the onset of the rest pain syndrome. The finding of thrombolysis in several patients with nontransmural MI and UA suggests that intracoronary thrombus formation plays a pathogenetic role in some patients with these ischemic syndromes.     

Quantitative coronary angiography during intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: How long to continue thrombolytic therapy?

An Intracoronary Infusion of streptokinase is often administered in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To address the question of how long intracoronary streptokinase should be infused, we studied 13 patients with symptoms and electrocardiographic findings suggesting an evolving myocardial infarction. We used subselective catheterization techniques and made quantitative angiographic measurements of the percentage of reduction of coronary artery (CA) diameter before intracoronary streptokinase therapy, immediately after reperfusion was established, and at the completion of streptokinase infusion. Before intracoronary streptokinase and after intracoronary nitroglycerin, nine patients had 100% obstruction of the CA in the “infarct-related vessel.” In seven patients reperfusion was established (25 ± 21 min, mean ± SD) at which time CA diameter was reduced by 77 ± 22%. The streptokinase infusion was then continued until repeated films (every 10 to 15 min) suggested no further change at the site of CA obstruction (93 ± 68 min). The percentage of CA diameter reduction when streptokinase infusion was discontinued was 55 ± 32%; this value was less (P < 0.05) than that observed early after reperfusion. These data show that after initial reperfusion was achieved by the use of intracoronary streptokinase, additional streptokinase lessened the reduction of CA diameter. Residual thrombus may be present at the narrowed CA site early after reperfusion, and further “cleanup” can be achieved by prolonging streptokinase infusion.     

An angiographic study of intracoronary streptokinase versus intravenous tissue plasminogen activator after failed coronary thrombolysis with intravenous streptokinase

Objective The medical treatment of failed intravenous streptokinase in patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction using angiographic endpoints.Design Prospective open angiographic comparison of intracoronary streptokinase with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Setting: Single center study in a tertiary institution.Subjects Eighty-five patients with acute myocardial infarction within 4 hours after symptom onset. Treatment regimens: The subjects received 1.5 million U intravenous streptokinase. Coronary angiography within 48 hours (median 19 hours) showed infarct-related vessel patency in 65 patients (76%). In the catheterization laboratory the 20 patients (24%) with failed intravenous streptokinase received repeat thrombolysis immediately after angiography. The first 10 patients with failed intravenous streptokinase received intracoronary streptokinase at a dose of 4000 U/min in the occluded infarctrelated artery for a maximum of 1 hour. The subsequent 10 patients received high-dose front-loaded intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (100 mg in 1 hour).Results In none of the patients receiving repeat streptokinase was reperfusion obtained. In 6 of 10 (60%) of the patients receiving tissue plasminogen activator, reperfusion was seen within 60 minutes (p < 0.005 vs. intracoronary streptokinase). One patient (5%) died and two refused follow-up angiography. Seventeen (88%) patients underwent angiography 3 months later according to the protocol. Two patients showed a persistently reperfused infarct-related artery, three reoccluded, four spontaneously reperfused, and eight had a persistently occluded infarct-related artery. The left ventricular ejection fraction was slightly higher at 3 months, and there were no differences between the patients with open vessels (increase + 7.7 ± 5.8%) and those with persistently occluded vessels (increase +5.8 ± 6.8%)Conclusions Repeat thrombolysis after failed intravenous streptokinase can be achieved with front-loaded intravenous tissue plasminogen activator but not with intracoronary streptokinase. Although patient numbers are small and repeat thrombolysis was performed rather late, this study leads the way to affordable optimization of thrombolysis, which needs large-scale testing.     

Intracoronary versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

To assess the relative efficacy of coronary thrombolysis using intracoronary versus intravenous streptokinase, 32 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to receive intracoronary (n = 17) and intravenous streptokinase (n = 15). All patients underwent selective coronary arteriography before and after administration of streptokinase by either route within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms. Intravenous streptokinase was given as 750,000 units over 30 minutes, while a mean dose of 180,000 units was required for thrombolysis in the group having intracoronary delivery. Recanalization occurred in 71.4% (10 of 14) of patients receiving streptokinase, by the intracoronary group in contrast to only 25% of patients (3 of 12) who received the drug intravenously (P less than 0.05). Spontaneous thrombolysis was seen in 17.6% and 20% of the patients in the groups having intracoronary and intravenous delivery, respectively. Bleeding complications were few in both groups. Thus, when baseline coronary arteriography is performed, recanalization with intracoronary streptokinase is more effective in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction than intravenous streptokinase.     

A randomized controlled trial of intravenous streptokinase in evolving acute myocardial infarction

To determine the efficacy of intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction, 52 patients were randomized to intravenous streptokinase or control groups. Time from onset of infarction to randomization was similar in the streptokinase group and control group, 4.9 +/- 2.1 hours vs 5.4 +/- 2.4 hours, respectively. The 28 streptokinase patients received an intravenous infusion of 700,000 units of streptokinase followed by full-dose anticoagulation. The 24 control patients received normal saline solution followed by full-dose anticoagulation. Of 28 streptokinase patients, 12 (43%) had noninvasive evidence of reperfusion by early peaking of serum creatine kinase (peak creatine kinase less than 16 hours after onset of infarction) vs 3 of 24 control patients (13%), p less than 0.02. Two streptokinase patients (7%) had reperfusion arrhythmias during streptokinase infusion. One streptokinase patient (4%) and two control patients (8%) died during hospitalization. At angiography (16 +/- 5 days after infarction) 22 of 26 streptokinase patients (85%) had a patent infarct-related coronary artery compared to 8 of 20 control patients (40%), p less than 0.01. Comparison of radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction assessed acutely (28 +/- 10 hours after infarction) with left ventricular ejection fraction at hospital discharge (15 +/- 3 days after infarction) showed no significant improvement in either the streptokinase or control group, 0% and +1%, respectively. At follow-up 13 +/- 7 months after infarction, total mortality rate was similar in the streptokinase group and control group, 17.8% (5 of 28 streptokinase patients) and 20.8% (5 of 24 control patients), respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

老年急性心肌梗死后梗死相关动脉再灌注对QT离散度的影响

目的了解老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)后梗死相关动脉(IRA)早期静脉溶栓再灌注或冠状动脉内支架置入术对QT离散度(QTd)的影响。方法对58例老年AMI患者(AMI组)予以静脉内溶栓,溶栓后选择性冠状动脉造影,对判定为心肌梗死溶栓试验性疗法(TIMI)2级以下者,部分行冠状动脉内支架置入术。溶栓前后测量分析QTd,并与48例冠状动脉造影正常的老年人(对照组)和50例健康体检非老年患者(非老年组)进行对照。结果AMI组溶栓前与对照组和非老年组间QTd有显著性差异(P<0.01);静脉溶栓后冠状动脉造影显示IRA血流达到TIMI 2~3级者,溶栓后2 h QTd显著降低,而IRA未开通者其QTd始终保持较高水平。16例溶栓前有室性心律失常者其QTd明显高于无心律失常者(P<0.05),结论IRA早期再灌注可使QTd显著降低,可减少恶性心律失常的发生。