吉西他滨单药与多西他赛单药治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的 观察吉西他滨单药与多西他赛单药一线治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及不良反应.方法 分析55例老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,吉西他滨单药化疗29例,多西他赛单药化疗26例,评价疗效及不良反应.结果 55例无CR病例,吉西他滨组PR 8例,SD 11例,PD 10例,中位生存期为5.5个月;多西他赛组PR 7例,SD 12例,PD 7例,中位生存期为6个月.两组比较RR及中位生存期差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.多西他赛组中性粒细胞减少及消化道黏膜反应的发生率略高于吉西他滨组.结论 吉西他滨单药与多西他赛单药治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效相当,但吉西他滨不良反应的发生率低.     

顺铂联合吉西他滨与联合多西紫杉醇治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效观察

目的 探讨顺铂联合吉西他滨与联合多西紫杉醇治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效、生存率及不良反应.方法 我院60例NSCLC患者随机分为2组,每组30例,1组给予顺铂联合吉西他滨方案(GP组),另1组给予顺铂联合多西紫杉醇方案(TP组),观察2组有效率、生存率及不良反应.结果 GP组的PR为53.3%,TP组的PR...     

奈达铂联合氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期食管癌的疗效观察

Objective To compare the efficacy of nedaplatin(NDP) and cisplatin( DDP) combined with 5-fluorouracil(S-Fu) in treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.Methods 61 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were divided into two groups randomly,the observation group(NDP group) were 30 cases and the control group (DDP group) were 31 cases.NDP group were given NDP(80 ～ 100mg/m2, intravenous drip, 1 day) and 5-Fu (0.5g/m2,intravenous drip,l～5 day) ,DDP group were given DDP(80 ～100mg/m2 ,devided into 3 days) and5-Fu ( 0.5 g/m2 , intravenous drip ,1～5 day).The cycles were repeated every 4 weeks, and the effects were assessed after 2 cycles.Results The remisson rate of the observation group was 56.1% ,significantly higher than that of the control group (29.0% ) ( P <0.05).The toxicity of the observation group was milder for gastrointestinal tract but more serious for bone marrow than that of the control group (all P < 0.05).Conclusion NDP was an effective platinum drug for esophageal carcinoma.The efficacy of nedaplatin combined with 5-Fu regimen was better than that of DDP combined with 5-Fu regimen,and it had a good clinical tolerance and could be recommended as the first-line drugs.     

多西他赛与顺铂联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察

目的观察多西他赛与顺铂联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和毒副反应。方法 113例NSCLC患者随机分为多西他赛组和长春瑞滨组,分别接受多西他赛+顺铂和长春瑞滨+顺铂治疗,21d为1周期,共治疗3个周期。结果多西他赛组的总缓解率和临床获益率分别为36.7%和91.7%,长春瑞滨组则分别为37.7%和90.6%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多西他赛组白细胞减少和恶心呕吐的发生率要明显低于长春瑞滨组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组血小板减少的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论多西他赛+顺铂治疗NSCLC的近期疗效和长春瑞滨+顺铂相当,但考虑到骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应,笔者建议采用多西他赛+顺铂。     

顺铂联合吉西他滨或多西他赛对晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效和不良反应的观察

目的 比较顺铂联合吉西他滨或多西他赛治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效和不良反应.方法 选取浙江省舟山医院2009年1月至2012年3月晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗初治患者120例,完全随机分为GP组（吉西他滨±顺铂）和DP组（多西他赛±顺铂）,每组60例.2组均给予顺铂30 mg/m^2,静脉滴注,第1～3天;GP组给予吉西他滨1 000 mg/m^2,静脉滴注30 min,第1、8天;DP组给予多西他赛75 mg/m^2,静脉滴注60 min,第1天.21 d为1个周期,共化疗2个周期.评价近期疗效和不良反应.结果 2组均无完全缓解病例.GP组和NP组的总缓解率分别为41.7％ （25/60）和43.3％（26/60）,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.GP组白细胞下降、肌肉酸痛的发生率明显低于DP组,差异有统计学意义[白细胞下降：63.3％ （38/60）比81.7％（49/60）,肌肉酸痛：0比31.7％ （19/60）,P＜0.05];血小板减少、皮疹的发生率明显高于DP组,差异有统计学意义[血小板减少：73.3％ （44/60）比33.3％（20/60）,皮疹：36.7％（22/60）比0,P＜0.05].结论 以顺铂为基础联合吉西他滨或多西他赛的双药化疗方案的近期疗效相当,不良反应各有侧重点,化疗过程中对不良反应应针对性地观察、预防和治疗.     

多西他赛和吉西他滨治疗非小细胞肺癌的时辰药效学

目的 比较多西他赛和吉西他滨不同时间点给药的疗效及不良反应.方法 病理诊断的210例Ⅲ、Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者随机均分为六组,分别于第1、8天的8:00(D1组)、14:00(D2组)和20:00(D3组)给予多西他赛40 mg/m2静脉滴注;G1、G2、G3组分别于上述时间点给予吉西他滨1 g/m2静脉滴注.所有病例均于第2、23天给予顺铂75 mg/m静脉滴注.化疗2个周期后评价各组疗效和不良反应.结果 D1、D2、D3组之间,G1、G2、G3组之间的疗效和不良反应均无统计学差异.D1组与G1组、D2组与G2组之间的的疗效和不良反应亦无统计学差异;G3组有效率高于D3组(56.3％vs.33.3％)(P＜0.05).结论 在20:00给药,吉西他滨的疗效优于多西他赛.     

顺铂联合多西他赛或吉西他滨治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床对照研究

目的：比较多西他赛联合顺铂与吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的近期临床疗效和不良反应。方法：将84例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为多西他赛和顺铂组（DC组）42例及吉西他滨和顺铂组（GC组）42例。同一方案治疗2个周期评估近期疗效及不良反应。结果：评价入组的84例患者的近期疗效,DC组和GC组有效率分别为45.2%和40.5%,两组之间有效率差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。毒副反应主要为骨髓抑制和消化道反应。结论：多西他赛加顺铂与吉西他滨加顺铂方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌均具有较好的临床疗效且两者的疗效相似,不良反应可以耐受,可以用于临床一线治疗。     

缬沙坦联合贝那普利治疗慢性心力衰竭的疗效观察

Objective To observe the effect of valsartan combined with benazepril in treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. Methods 60 patients with heart failure of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class Ⅱ -Ⅳ and LVEF less than or equal 40% were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The patients in control group were given benazepril(10mg/d) alone,and the patients in treatment group were given valsartan(80mg/d) combined with benazepril(10mg/d). After 8 months therapy, the changes of the parameters of left ventriclular function and ventriclular dimension of the patients with chronic heart failure were compared before and after treatment. And the clinical efficacy was compared between two groups. Results The ventriclular dimension of the patients with chronic heart failure was decreased,and left ventriclular function was improved. The patients of the combination therapy group were improved especially after treatment. Conclusion Angiotensin-converting-enzyme(ACE) inhibitor could improve heart function of patients with chronic heart failure. Therapy of valsartan combined with benazepril was more effective.     

吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗蒽环类耐药的转移性乳腺癌的临床疗效和安全性分析

目的分析吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗蒽环类耐药的转移性乳腺癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法将2008年6月至2012年6月我院收治的91例对蒽环类耐药的转移性乳腺癌患者为研究对象,并将其随机分为两组,即吉西他滨组45例,给予吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗,多西紫杉醇组46例,给予多西紫杉醇联合卡培他滨治疗,21天为1疗程,每疗程进行毒副作用评估,两组均治疗2疗程后对比临床疗效。结果吉西他滨组的总缓解率(44.44%)明显高于多西紫杉醇组(21.74%)(P<0.05);吉西他滨组Ⅲ、Ⅳ度骨髓抑制发生率(17.78%)和Ⅲ、Ⅳ度消化道毒副作用发生率(20.00%)均明显低于多西紫杉醇组(39.13%,43.48%)(P<0.05)。结论吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗蒽环类耐药的转移性乳腺癌疗效较多西紫杉醇联合卡培他滨更好,且不良反应的发生率更低,值得临床推广。     

多西他赛对比吉西他滨联合顺铂方案治疗非小细胞肺癌临床疗效探讨

目的探讨临床对非小细胞肺癌患者实施顺铂方案联合多西他赛对比吉西他滨的治疗可行性。方法将2012年5月至2014年5月我院收录并治疗的60例非小细胞肺癌患者纳入研究,随机将其等分成两组化疗,DP组实施多西他赛+顺铂方案,GP组实施吉西他滨+顺铂方案,研究两组化疗4~6周期(21d/周期)的临床总疗效与药物安全性,同时对比1年存活率。结果治疗后,DP组的临床总疗效是46.7%,与GP组的43.3%对比相仿(P>0.05)。两组治疗期间均有骨髓抑制、消化道反应等不适出现,但发生率的对比相仿(P>0.05)。经7~24个月时间随访,DP组1年存活率是50.0%,与GP组的46.7%接近,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对非小细胞肺癌患者实施多西他赛+顺铂方案化疗,可取得与吉西他滨+顺铂方案相当的疗效,二者均适合作为一线用药方案普及。     

GP和TP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床对照研究

目的：对照研究吉西他滨（GEM）联合顺铂（DDP）及多西紫杉醇（TXT）联合奈达铂（NDP）两方案在治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及不良反应。方法：58例晚期非小细胞肺癌随机分成两组,吉西他滨（GP）组30例,多西紫杉醇组（TP）28例,比较两方案疗效。结果：GP组和TP组有效率分别为43.3%和46.4%,两组间差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。中位生存期（MST）：GP组为12.8个月,TP组为13.6个月,疾病缓解时间（DRT）分别为6.1个月及7.8个月。GP组和TP组1、2年期生存率分别为42.5%和44.7%,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。不良反应：TP组WBC下降36例,占67%,其中Ⅲ/Ⅳ度白细胞下降10例占22%,明显高于GP组（P〈0.05）。结论：GP方案和TP方案对晚期非小细胞肺癌近期临床疗效、中位生存期及疾病缓解时间相似,不良反应较TP发生率高,但骨髓抑制较TP组轻。因此,两种方案均可作为晚期非小细胞肺癌的一种安全、有效的化疗方案。     

替吉奥和吉西他滨分别联合顺铂一线治疗EGFR野生型的晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的:比较替吉奥联合顺铂方案和吉西他滨联合顺铂方案一线治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因野生型的晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性。方法:选取2010年7月-2011年12月收治的68例符合入组标准的EGFR基因野生型的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,将其随机分为2组,观察组采用替吉奥联合顺铂方案进行一线化疗;对照组采用吉西他滨联合顺铂方案进行一线化疗。比较2组患者的近期疗效、无进展生存期和不良反应。结果:替吉奥联合顺铂组(观察组)和吉西他滨联合顺铂组(对照组)的总有效率分别为41.2%和38.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);中位无进展生存期分别为5.4个月和5.1个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.088);不良反应中替吉奥组的血小板降低发生率(11.8%)低于吉西他滨组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:替吉奥联合顺铂方案一线治疗EGFR基因野生型的晚期非小细胞肺癌具有较好疗效,且不良反应较轻。     

国产多西紫杉醇联合顺铂在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的应用

目的观察国产多西紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的近期疗效和不良反应。方法采用DP方案化疗:多帕菲75mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天;顺铂75mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天;21d为1个周期。至少使用2个周期评价疗效。结果70例中CR2例,PR29例,SD36例,PD3例,总有效率为44.3%。中位TTP6.3个月,中位生存期10.1个月,1年生存率38.6%。不良反应主要为骨髓抑制、脱发和消化系统反应,骨髓抑制为剂量限制性毒性,其中白细胞减少占75.7%。结论国产多西紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗晚期NSCLC近期疗效较好,毒不良反应较轻,值得临床进一步推广应用。     

多西紫杉醇联合顺铂2周方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床观察

目的探讨多西紫杉醇联合顺铂2周给药一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及毒副作用。方法多西紫杉醇75mg/m2静脉滴注,顺铂25mg/m2×3d静脉滴注联合化疗,每2周重复疗程。化疗期间用粒细胞-集落刺激因子预防性支持治疗。结果共39例晚期NSCLC患者完成化疗,36例可评价疗效,其中完全缓解1例(2.8%),部分缓解13例(36.1%),稳定21例(58.3%),进展1例(2.8%);总有效率38.9%。本方案化疗所致毒性反应主要为骨髓抑制,恶心、呕吐,肌肉、关节痛,脱发和疲劳。结论多西紫杉醇联合顺铂2周给药是治疗晚期NSCLC的有效可行方案,其毒副作用患者可耐受,值得进一步研究。     

吉西他滨和顺铂联合重组人血管内皮抑制素治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床观察

目的评价吉西他滨和顺铂联合重组人血管内皮抑制素（恩度）治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性。方法 38例病理确诊的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者给予吉西他滨和顺铂联合恩度治疗,吉西他滨1000mg/m2,第1,8天,顺铂75mg/m2,第2天,恩度注射液7.5mg/m2加入500ml生理盐水中,滴注时间3～4小时,第1～14日,每21天为一周期。结果 38例患者入组,部分缓解13例,疾病稳定17例,疾病进展8例,客观有效率为34.2%,疾病控制率为78.9%。本组中位无进展生存期为4.6个月,95%CI为2.600～6.600个月,中位生存期为13.5个月,95%CI为9.599～17.401个月,1年生存率42.1%。结论吉西他滨和顺铂联合恩度治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌,有较好的疗效和安全性,具有较好临床应用前景。     

The current status of docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel is an active single agent in both first- and second-line therapy of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized trials versus best supportive care have documented an improvement in overall survival for docetaxel therapy in both settings. Docetaxel also produced a significant 1-year survival rate improvement when compared with vinorelbine or ifosfamide as second-line therapy. Docetaxel has been extensively investigated in phase I/II studies in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin, irinotecan and gemcitabine. Substantial activity has been demonstrated. In a randomized phase II trial comparing docetaxel plus cisplatin with docetaxel plus gemcitabine, the efficacy of the two regimens was almost identical (response rates 32 and 34%; 1-year survival rates 42 and 38%). However, the combination of docetaxel with gemcitabine was associated with significantly less grade III/IV neutropenia, diarrhea and nausea/vomiting. Three drug regimens combining docetaxel with, for example, gemcitabine and carboplatin or with ifosfamide and cisplatin, are producing very high response rates in phase II trials. Whether three-drug combinations including docetaxel will result in an improved outcome for patients with advanced NSCLC remains to be determined.     

Monthly gemcitabine (days 1, 8 and 15) plus cisplatin (days 1-3) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

On the basis of the reported efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this combination has been selected to be given as our firstline service regimen for advanced or metastatic disease. Patients recruitment was almost unlimited: no exclusion criteria were made, except for disease-related Karnofsky's performance status below 50%, the presence of central nervous system or spinal involvement by uncontrolled metastases, or creatinine clearance below 50 ml/min. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks were given on an outpatient schedule to consecutive patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Forty-three successive NSCLC patients with histologically or cytologically proven disease were treated. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 35% of cases, squamous cell carcinoma in 60% and broncho-alveolar type in 5%. Smoking was mentioned by 63% of the patients. Numerous medical problems were recorded in 75% of the patients. Stage IIIB was observed in 10 of 43 patients, while metastatic disease was found in the rest. All the patients, except for two, were symptomatic. Two patients achieved complete response (5%) and 16 achieved partial response (37%), yielding an overall objective response rate of 42%. Minimal response was observed in seven patients (16%) and disease stabilization in 7%. Adding the objective response rate to the minimal response and stabilization rates, the disease-control (progression-free) rate reaches 65%. The time to progression ranged from 0 to 69 weeks in all the patients. The overall survival of the group ranged from 4 to 98 weeks, with a median of 45 weeks. Clinical benefit response was observed mainly in patients who also achieved an objective response. We conclude that outpatient cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination is feasible, efficacious and justified in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.     

多西他赛联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床研究

目的观察比较多西他赛联合顺铂（TP方案）与吉西他滨联合顺铂（GP方案）治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的疗效和毒性反应。方法97例晚期NSCLC患者随机分为TP组51例和GP组46例,化疗两个周期后,对两组的临床疗效和毒性反应进行评价。结果TP组及GP组有效率分别为54.9%和41.3%,（P〈0.05）,中位疾病进展时间分别为9个月及4个月,中位生存期分别为15个月及9个月。毒性反应以骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应为主。结论TP方案治疗NSCLC近期疗效高于GP方案（P〈0.05）,毒性反应可以耐受。     

Docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin is a safe and active schedule as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase II study

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) (day 1) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (administered as 40 mg/m(2) doses each on days 1 and 2) every 3 weeks as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-two NSCLC patients were enrolled, most of them with stage IV disease (74%). A total of 195 chemotherapy cycles were administered (median 6, range 1-6). All patients were considered evaluable for efficacy and toxicity in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The overall response rate was 48% (95% CI, 33-64), including one CR (3%) and 19 PRs (45%). Stable disease was found in 6 patients (14%). The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.7) and the median overall survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-16.0). The survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 36.0% (95% CI, 19.9-52.0) and 18.0% (95% CI, 3.9-32.1), respectively. Overall, the combination showed an excellent safety profile. Severe hematological toxicities were uncommon: neutropenia (5% of patients, 1% of cycles) and febrile neutropenia (2% of patients, 0.5% of cycles). Asthenia (12%) was the only grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity that affected more than 10% of patients. There were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients showed similar efficacy as the same combination with higher doses of docetaxel but where cisplatin was administered in a single dose. This new schedule shows promise in its excellent hematological and non-hematological toxicity profile. A randomized phase III trial is needed to confirm these results.