Long-term retention of implicitly acquired learning in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

This study examined retention of procedural learning, using the serial reaction time (SRT) task, over a 1- or 2-week delay in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and elderly control (EC) subjects. The SRT task is a four-choice reaction-time task consisting of blocks of 100 trials. A 10-item repeating sequence was embedded in the first four blocks of trials in session one and the first two blocks of session two. Sequence-specific learning was assessed in session one by comparing reaction time (RT) in the fourth block with a repeating sequence to a fifth block in session one in which the stimuli were randomly arranged. After excluding subjects with deficient session one learning, there were eight AD patients and 14 EC subjects who showed robust sequence-specific learning in session one. In these subjects, retention of sequence-specific learning over the 1- to 2-week delay was examined. The AD patients and EC subjects showed an equivalent change in RT across sessions, and all the AD patients lacked any declarative knowledge of the repeating sequence within the task. Individually, two of the eight AD patients appeared to deviate substantially from the others and from the EC subjects in their excess slowing of RT across sessions. Since six AD patients did show retention similar to the EC subjects, it is concluded that at least some AD patients show normal retention of implicitly acquired knowledge over a long delay. Preserved retention in some of the AD patients implies that it is mediated by brain structures that are not affected by the Alzheimer neuropathological process.     

Long-term Retention of Implicitly Acquired Learning in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

This study examined retention of procedural learning, using the serial reaction time (SRT) task, over a 1- or 2-week delay in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and elderly control (EC) subjects. The SRT task is a four-choice reaction-time task consisting of blocks of 100 trials. A 10-item repeating sequence was embedded in the first four blocks of trials in session one and the first two blocks of session two. Sequence-specific learning was assessed in session one by comparing reaction time (RT) in the fourth block with a repeating sequence to a fifth block in session one in which the stimuli were randomly arranged. After excluding subjects with deficient session one learning, there were eight AD patients and 14 EC subjects who showed robust sequence-specific learning in session one. In these subjects, retention of sequence-specific learning over the 1- to 2-week delay was examined. The AD patients and EC subjects showed an equivalent change in RT across sessions, and all the AD patients lacked any declarative knowledge of the repeating sequence within the task. Individually, two of the eight AD patients appeared to deviate substantially from the others and from the EC subjects in their excess slowing of RT across sessions. Since six AD patients did show retention similar to the EC subjects, it is concluded that at least some AD patients show normal retention of implicitly acquired knowledge over a long delay. Preserved retention in some of the AD patients implies that it is mediated by brain structures that are not affected by the Alzheimer neuropathological process.     

Sequence learning in Parkinson's disease: a comparison of spatial-attention and number-response sequences

The serial reaction time (SRT) task has been frequently used to assess procedural learning of sequences. Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have been reported to show deficits on this task, but it is as yet unclear whether this impairment reflects a general sequencing deficit or a deficit in the sequencing of motor-output responses. In order to examine this issue, PD patients and controls were administered an SRT task which allowed the simultaneous and independent assessment of the procedural learning of spatial regularities and the learning of motor-response regularities. PD patients were unimpaired at learning a sequence of spatial locations, but showed a deficit at learning a stimulus-to-motor-response sequence. The results suggest that sequencing impairments in PD are not general, but specific to the type of sequential information inherent in a task.     

An fMRI investigation of procedural learning in unaffected siblings of individuals with schizophrenia

Vulnerability for schizophrenia is related, in part, to genetic predisposition. The identification of pathophysiological abnormalities associated with the disorder that are also present in unaffected family members of individuals with schizophrenia may assist in delineating the genetic contributions to vulnerability for schizophrenia. Previous functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) investigations of procedural learning in patients with schizophrenia identified reduced activity in the frontal cortex, basal ganglia, and parietal cortex during performance of the serial reaction time (SRT) task suggesting that abnormal function of these regions may relate to genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia. In order to examine this hypothesis, 12 unaffected siblings of patients and 15 controls underwent fMRI during performance of the SRT task. Unaffected siblings demonstrated normal performance on the SRT task. However, compared to controls unaffected siblings demonstrated less activity in regions of the frontal and parietal lobes and, to a lesser extent, basal ganglia, during procedural learning. Interestingly, unaffected siblings demonstrated greater activity in regions of the frontal cortex during the control condition compared to the procedural learning condition of the SRT task, an idiosyncratic pattern that was also observed in patient groups but not control subjects of two prior imaging studies. The findings support previous investigations suggesting that altered cerebral neurophysiology during performance of cognitive tasks may be related to genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia. Identification of genes related to the function of cerebral regions such as the prefrontal cortex, parietal lobe, and basal ganglia may assist in delineating the genetic contributions to schizophrenia.     

Implicit procedural learning in fragile X and Down syndrome

Background Procedural learning refers to rule‐based motor skill learning and storage. It involves the cerebellum, striatum and motor areas of the frontal lobe network. Fragile X syndrome, which has been linked with anatomical abnormalities within the striatum, may result in implicit procedural learning deficit. Methods To address this issue, a serial reaction time (RT) task including six blocks of trials was performed by 14 individuals with fragile X syndrome, 12 individuals with Down syndrome and 12 mental age‐matched control subjects. The first (B1) and fifth (B5) blocks were random whereas the others (B2, B3, B4 and B6) consisted of a repeated 10‐step sequence. Results were analysed by Kruskal–Wallis one‐way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results For patients with fragile X syndrome, the RT was highly suggestive of preserved implicit learning as a significant difference was observed between blocks B5 and B6 (P = 0.009). However, the difference of RT between B4 and B5 did not reach significance, possibly due to a subgroup of individuals who did not learn. In contrast, in the Down syndrome group, RT decreased significantly between B4 and B5 (W = 2; P = 0.003) but not between the last ordered block (B6) and the last random block (B5), suggesting a weakness in procedural learning which was sensitive to the interfering random block. Conclusion implicit learning is variable in genetic syndromes and therefore relatively independent of general intellectual capacities. The results are discussed together with previous reports.     

Implicit memory is independent from IQ and age but not from etiology: evidence from Down and Williams syndromes

Background In the last few years, experimental data have been reported on differences in implicit memory processes of genetically distinct groups of individuals with Intellectual Disability (ID). These evidences are relevant for the more general debate on supposed asynchrony of cognitive maturation in children with abnormal brain development. This study, comparing implicit memory processes in individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS), was planned to verify the ‘etiological specificity’ hypotheses pertaining to the skill learning abilities of individuals with ID. Method A modified version of Nissen and Bullemer's (1987) Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task was used. The performances of three group were evaluated. The first group consisted of thirty‐two people with WS (18 males and 14 females). The second group was comprised of twenty‐six individuals with DS (14 males and 12 females). The two groups of individuals with ID were selected so that the groups were comparable as for mental age and chronological age. The third group consisted of forty‐nine typically developed children with a mental age similar to that of the groups with WS and DS. Results The two groups of individuals with ID demonstrated different patterns of procedural learning. WS individuals revealed poor implicit learning of the temporal sequence of events characterizing the ordered blocks in the SRT task. Indeed, differently from normal controls, WS participants showed no reaction time (RT) speeding through ordered blocks. Most importantly, the rebound effect, which so dramatically affected normal children's RTs passing from the last ordered to the last block, had only a marginal influence on WS children's RTs. Differently from the WS group, the rate of procedural learning of the participants with DS was comparable to that of their controls. Indeed, DS and typically developed individuals showed parallel RT variations in the series of ordered blocks and, more importantly, passing from the last ordered to the last block. Therefore, a substantial preservation of skill learning abilities in this genetic syndrome is confirmed. Conclusions The results of the present study document that procedural learning in individuals with ID depends on the aetiology of the syndrome, thus supporting the etiological specificity account of their cognitive development. These results are relevant for our knowledge about the qualitative aspects and the underlying neurobiological substrate of the anomalous cognitive development in mentally retarded people.     

Simple and choice reaction time in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

The performance of 56 homosexual men infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was compared to that of 23 HIV antibody-seronegative controls on simple (SRT) and choice (CRT) reaction time tasks. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to Centers for Disease Control clinical criteria. There were 18 patients who had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), 18 who had AIDS-related complex (ARC), and 20 who were HIV antibody-seropositive but otherwise asymptomatic (HIV-Ab+). The SRT task consisted of 5 trials, each containing 10 target stimuli. The CRT task consisted of 10 trials, each containing 5 target stimuli randomly interspersed with 5 nontarget stimuli. The mean response latency of each of the patient groups on the SRT task was not significantly different from that of controls. However, the performance of patients with AIDS or ARC on the CRT task was significantly lower than that of controls, whereas that of HIV-Ab+ patients was not. Analysis of the quality of RT task performance also indicated that the impairment of processing efficiency at higher levels of task difficulty reflected a disruption of processing prior to the response selection stage.     

Sensory processing in Huntington’s disease

Objective

An intriguing electrophysiological feature of patients with Huntington’s disease (HD) is the delayed latency and decreased amplitude of somatosensory long-latency evoked potentials (LLeps). We investigated whether such dysfunction was associated with delayed conscious perception of the sensory stimulus.

Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies

A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tasks, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. A total of 14 studies were identified, representing data from 314 individuals with dyslexia and 317 typically developing control participants. The results indicate that, on average, individuals with dyslexia have worse procedural learning abilities than controls, as indexed by sequence learning on the SRT task. The average weighted standardized mean difference (the effect size) was found to be 0.449 (CI₉₅: .204, .693), and was significant (p < .001). However, moderate levels of heterogeneity were found between study-level effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses indicated that studies with older participants that used SRT tasks with second order conditional sequences, or with older participants that used sequences that were presented a large number of times, were associated with smaller effect sizes. These associations are discussed with respect to compensatory and delayed memory systems in dyslexia.     

Motor and non-motor sequence learning in patients with basal ganglia lesions: the case of serial reaction time (SRT)

In order to address the question of whether the basal ganglia are involved exclusively in regulation of motor sequence learning, or if they are involved in non-motor sequence learning as well, two versions of the serial reaction time (SRT) task were administered: First is the standard version of the SRT task in which the sequence is executed motorically, and the second is a non-motor version of the task which requires response only to a particular position of the sequence. Sixteen patients with damage restricted to the region of the basal ganglia and 16 matched control subjects participated in this study. In addition to the motor and non-motor SRT tasks, two declarative memory tests (Visual Paired Associates and Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test) were administered to the participants. Results indicate that the two groups did not differ either on learning rate of the two declarative tasks, or on the declarative component of the SRT tasks (i.e., 'generate'). However, the control group was significantly superior to the basal ganglia (BG) group in learning a specific sequence in the motor and non-motor SRT tasks. Results suggest that the basal ganglia are involved in the regulation of non- motor as well as motor sequence learning.     

Motor and non-motor sequence learning in children and adolescents with cerebellar damage.

Cerebellar involvement in motor and non-motor sequence learning was examined with serial reaction time tasks (SRT). Our sample consisted of 8 children and adolescents who had undergone surgical removal of a benign posterior fossa tumor (PFT) during childhood. None of them had undergone chemotherapy or cranial radiation therapy (CRT). Ages ranged from 1-11 years at surgery and 9-17 years at testing. The children were tested not earlier than 2.5 years after surgery (M = 5.9 years), enabling brain plasticity and recovery of functions. Their performance was compared with a matched control sample. The PFT group was not impaired in the implicit learning of sequences, as reflected in their performance in blocks with a repeated sequence, both before and after a random block. However, in the perceptual task, their performance deteriorated more than that of the control group when a random block was introduced, suggesting that it was more difficult for the patients to respond flexibly or change their response set when encountering changing task demands. These results are in line with another study by our group on task switching with the same patients.     

Visuo-motor and cognitive procedural learning in children with basal ganglia pathology

We investigated procedural learning in 18 children with basal ganglia (BG) lesions or dysfunctions of various aetiologies, using a visuo-motor learning test, the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task, and a cognitive learning test, the Probabilistic Classification Learning (PCL) task. We compared patients with early (<1 year old, n = 9), later onset (>6 years old, n = 7) or progressive disorder (idiopathic dystonia, n = 2). All patients showed deficits in both visuo-motor and cognitive domains, except those with idiopathic dystonia, who displayed preserved classification learning skills. Impairments seem to be independent from the age of onset of pathology. As far as we know, this study is the first to investigate motor and cognitive procedural learning in children with BG damage. Procedural impairments were documented whatever the aetiology of the BG damage/dysfunction and time of pathology onset, thus supporting the claim of very early skill learning development and lack of plasticity in case of damage.     

Implicit learning in patients with Alzheimer's disease

We examined implicit memory using priming and procedural learning tasks in patients with probable Dementia-Alzheimer's Type (DAT) to examine whether priming and procedural processes could be dissociated and whether task specificity was a factor in DAT patient performance. Priming was tested using a word recognition paradigm (perceptual priming) and by repeated administrations of a fragmented objects test (long term priming). Procedural learning was tested using repeated and random sequences on a choice serial reaction time task and by repeated administration of a puzzle map of the United States. DAT patients were compared to hospitalized depressed patients, patients suffering from Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), and normal controls. We found that DAT patients demonstrated marginal but significant implicit learning on both procedural learning and perceptual priming tasks. DAT patients performed relatively better on the procedural learning task than a perceptual priming task compared to PSP patients, suggesting that priming of meaningful stimuli is subserved by cortical structures whereas procedural motor responses to simple serial visual stimulus patterns can be maintained by subcortical systems. Furthermore, our findings suggest that priming and procedural processes can be dissociated and that task specificity is a factor in interpreting the results of implicit learning paradigms in DAT patients. The implications of these results for models of knowledge representation and memory processes as well as the way they can serve as models for testing nootropic drug effects are discussed.     

Procedural learning and Parkinson disease: implication of striato-frontal loops

OBJECTIVE: To investigate procedural learning in non demented patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Experimental evidence implicate the basal ganglia in procedural learning. Selective impairment has more recently been described in patients with frontal lesions. METHODS: The performance of 20 demented patients and 15 matched normal controls was studied in the serial reaction time task (SRTT). Performance on procedural task was further compared with that of 9 normal controls and with patients' performance on tests assessing explicit memory, executive functions and global efficiency. RESULTS: The group of patients with PD showed impaired procedural learning. The difference of response time between the repeated and the non-repeated blocks was smaller in PD when compared to controls. Subsequent analyses separated PD patients into two subgroups according to their performance on SRTT, measured by the rebound effect. PD patients whose learning was normal differed from PD patients whose learning was impaired on performance in tests sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the implication of the striatum in procedural learning and suggest that performance on cognitive procedural learning depends on the striato-frontal circuits.     

Implicit Learning in Parkinson's Disease: Evidence from a Verbal Version of the Serial Reaction Time Task

Evidence suggests that patients suffering from Parkinson's Disease (PD) demonstrate less sequence learning in the serial reaction time (SRT) task devised by Nissen and Bullemer (1987). One of the problems with this task is that it is motor intensive and, given the motor difficulties which characterize Parkinson's disease (e.g., tremor, impaired facility of movement, rigidity, and loss of postural reflexes), allows the possibility that patients with PD are capable of sequence learning but are simply unable to demonstrate this through a decrease in reaction time over trials. The present study examined the performance of patients with PD and healthy controls, matched for verbal fluency, on a verbal version of the SRT task where the standard button-pressing response was replaced by a spoken response. Thirteen nondementing patients with PD and 11 healthy controls were administered the SRT task. The PD group demonstrated less sequence learning than the controls and this was independent of age and severity of illness. The results add support to those studies which have found impaired sequence learning using the standard form of the SRT task.     

Impaired visuo-motor sequence learning in Developmental Coordination Disorder

The defining feature of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is the marked impairment in the development of motor coordination (DSM-IV-TR, American Psychiatric Association, 2000). In the current study, we focused on one core aspect of motor coordination: learning to correctly sequence movements. We investigated the procedural, visuo-motor sequence learning abilities of 18 children with DCD and 20 matched typically developing (TD) children, by means of the serial reaction time (SRT) task. Reaction time measurements yielded two important findings. Overall, DCD children demonstrated general learning of visuo-motor task demands comparable to that of TD children but failed to learn the visuo-motor sequence. Interestingly, a sequence recall test, administered after the SRT task, indicated some awareness of the repeating sequence pattern. This suggests that the sequence learning problems of DCD children might be located at the stage of motor planning rather than sequence acquisition.     

Effect of the dopamine D2 receptor T allele on response latency after mild traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: The authors tested the hypothesis that the dopamine D2 receptor T allele (formerly described as the A1 allele) would be associated with poorer performance on memory and attention tasks following mild traumatic brain injury. METHOD: Thirty-nine patients with mild traumatic brain injury and 27 comparison subjects were genotyped. All subjects completed memory and attention tests, including the California Verbal Learning Test recognition task and the Continuous Performance Test. RESULTS: In both groups the T allele was associated with poorer performance on the California Verbal Learning Test recognition task. There was also a significant diagnosis-by-allele interaction on measures of response latency (Continuous Performance Test): the subjects with mild traumatic brain injury and the T allele had the worst performance. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic polymorphisms modulating central dopaminergic tone can affect cognitive outcome following mild traumatic brain injury.     

The relation of White Matter Hyperintensities to implicit learning in healthy older adults

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether MRI evidence of cerebrovascular disease in the form of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) was associated with decreased implicit sequence learning performance in a high-functioning group of normal elderly volunteers. METHOD: One hundred and eight community-dwelling elderly individuals received an MRI and performed an implicit sequence learning task, the serial reaction time (SRT) task. RESULTS: Hyperintensities present in the white matter were associated with a decreased learning effect. This association was found with both deep white matter and periventricular changes. Other factors affecting SRT performance (i.e., baseline reaction time and switch-cost) were not significantly related to the presence of WMH. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that in addition to previously identified generalized cognitive deficits, WMH are also associated with a specific decrease in the implicit learning of sequences.     

The role of the basal ganglia and its cortical connections in sequence learning: Evidence from implicit and explicit sequence learning in Parkinson's disease

Implicit (unconscious/incidental) and explicit (conscious/intentional) learning are considered to have distinct neural substrates. It is proposed that implicit learning is mediated by the basal ganglia (BG), while explicit learning has been linked to the medial temporal lobes (MTL). To test such a dissociation we investigated implicit and explicit sequence learning in Parkinson's disease (PD), a disorder characterized by striatal dysfunction. We studied both implicit and explicit learning of a 12-item sequence of target locations in 13 PD patients and 15 age-matched controls. In the implicit sequence learning task all participants completed 10 blocks of a probabilistic serial reaction time (SRT) task in which they were exposed to the sequence without explicit knowledge of it. Participants also completed between 1 and 10 blocks of an explicit sequence learning task in which the sequence was learned deliberately by trial-and-error. Both implicit and explicit sequence learning were significantly impaired in PD patients compared to controls. The results indicate that, in addition to playing a role in implicit sequence learning, the BG and its frontal projections are also involved in explicit sequence learning.     

Probabilistic classification learning with corrective feedback is selectively impaired in early Huntington's disease--evidence for the role of the striatum in learning with feedback

In general, declarative learning is associated with the activation of the medial temporal lobes (MTL), while the basal ganglia (BG) are considered the substrate for procedural learning. More recently it has been demonstrated the distinction of these systems may not be as absolute as previously thought and that not only the explicit or implicit nature of the memory task alone is important for the distinction of MTL or BG systems. Nevertheless, patients with BG dysfunction - such as patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or Huntington's disease (HD) - are considered to be impaired at implicit learning. However, a more recent study demonstrated that one implicit learning task, probabilistic classification learning (examples include the weather prediction (WPT) and Mr. Potato Head tasks) is only impaired in PD when it involves learning with corrective feedback (FB) but not when it involves learning in a paired associate (PA) manner, without feedback. Therefore, it has been argued that the presence of feedback rather than the implicit nature of these tasks determines whether or not the BG are recruited. As patients with HD as well as those with PD, have also been shown to be impaired on the standard FB based version of probabilistic classification learning, the question remains as to whether or not there is a similar selective deficit in FB but not PA based probabilistic classification learning in HD. 18 patients with early HD and 18 healthy controls completed FB and PA versions of the WPT task. Relative to controls, HD patients were selectively impaired at WPT learning with feedback. These findings are consistent with previous evidence from studies of probabilistic classification learning in PD. Unlike PD, selective deficits in WPT learning in HD cannot be attributed to the effects of dopaminergic medication and must be directly related to BG dysfunction; for instance even in early HD, only 50% of the neurons in the medial head of caudate remain. We conclude that the striatum is important for WPT learning with feedback. Our findings are consistent with imaging evidence showing recruitment of the caudate during FB based WPT learning, while the MTL is associated with PA based learning.