Elective preoperative use of intra aortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk group of coronary artery disease patients to facilitate off pump surgery

Background To avoid the deleterious effects of cardio-pulmonary bypass, off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) is increasingly the procedure of choice in the majority of patients needing myocardial revascularization. However patients at high operative risk are sometimes not given the advantage of off pump surgery because of haemodynamic deterioration during displacement of the heart to access the target vessels, or deterioration per se due to the factor causing the high risk (eg unstable hemodynamics) leading to institution of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB). Preoperative intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) therapy improves cardiac performance and facilitates the access to the anastomotic site during off pump coronary artery bypass grafting while maintaining haemodynamic stability. Methods Two hundred and twelve patients for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between June 2000 and June 2006 were studied in whom preoperative IABC was instituted. Initially, the trial was started in two groups and patients were computer randomized to ‘IABC’ and ‘No IABC’ groups. The trial was abandoned after 15 cases in each group, because of the adverse outcomes in ‘No IABC’ group. Left main stenosis was present in 31.1%, triple vessel disease in 87.7%, recent myocardial infarction in 21.2%, 35.8% were hypertensive, and 32% were diabetic. Results Out of 212 cases in whom preoperative IABC was instituted OPCABG was possible in the majority (88.2%), while of 15 cases in ‘No IABP’ group all CABG were done on CPB. Mortality and average stay in ICU was markedly lower in patients where IABC was instituted preoperatively. Conclusions Elective preoperative IABC in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease permits OPCABG in the majority, reduces the ICU stay, leads to earlier weaning from intra aortic balloon pump (IABP), reduces the morbidity and mortality, and is more economical.     

Cardiac biomarker release after CABG with different surgical techniques

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the release of cardiac biomarkers (troponin I and CK-MB) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (>or=2 vessel disease, ejection fraction >or=0.35%, elective procedure). INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac biomarkers were measured before surgery, at intensive care unit arrival, 4 and 18 hours after the end of the procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac biomarker release was higher in on-pump than in off-pump patients at every time point. On multivariate analysis, CPB (p < 0.0001), number of distal grafts (p = 0.005), and hypertension treatment (p = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of peak cardiac troponin release. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac troponin I release after multivessel CABG is associated with the technique. Different values for the normal range should be considered. OPCABG is minimally invasive for the heart as far as myocardial marker release is concerned.     

Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

The beneficial effects of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have been reported. However, the benefits of insertion of IABP electively in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) have not been established. Six hundred and twenty-five patients who underwent OPCAB form the study group. High-risk patients fulfilling two or more of the following: left main stem stenosis >70%, unstable angina, and poor left ventricular function, who had elective insertion of IABP preoperatively by the open technique (group I; n = 20) were compared with a similar high-risk group that did not (group II; n = 25). There were no significant differences in risk factors between the two groups (Euroscore 5.68). The mean number of grafts was similar. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the need for inotropes, duration of ventilation, arrhythmias, cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, and infective complications (p = NS). There were no IABP-related complications. Acute renal failure requiring hemofiltration was higher in group II (n = 5; p < 0.05). Four patients (16%) in group II required postoperative IABP. Although intensive care stay was longer in group I (27.6 +/- 15.3 vs. 18.6 +/- 9.1 hours; p < 0.05), patients in group I were discharged earlier from hospital. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups (n = 1 in each group). In high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB, routine preoperative insertion of IABP electively reduces the incidence of acute renal failure. In addition it avoids the need for emergency insertion postoperatively and may result in earlier discharge.     

Intraaortic balloon pumping in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Beneficial effect of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) treatment in high-risk patients who had open heart surgery have been demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative IABP use on survival in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients having CABG at our institution were reviewed. Patients having an IABP were identified retrospectively and grouped into one of 3 groups as follows. Group A (n = 14): preoperative IABP for high-risk urgent or elective cases. Group B (n = 26): preoperative IABP for emergency cases. Group C (n = 6): unplanned intraoperative or postoperative IABP. RESULTS: Forty-six patients had an IABP (16.6% of total). Parsonnet score in group B was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Length of operation for group C was significantly longer (p < 0.05). Overall hospital mortality in the total group of 277 cases was 4.2%. Hospital mortality was 7.1% in group A, 7.7% in group B, and 50% in group C. Hospital mortality in group C was significantly higher (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative treatment with IABP in high-risk patients undergoing CABG was confirmed. This approach resulted in a significantly lower hospital mortality.     

Predictors of inotrope use during separation from cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE: To identify the demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic features that predict the use of inotropic support at separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Design: Retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. SETTING: Referral center for cardiothoracic surgery at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand nine patients undergoing either CABG or combined CABG and valve surgery with CPB in whom an intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination was performed. INTERVENTIONS: Inotropic support was defined as the use of dopamine >/=5 microg/kg/min; any dose of epinephrine, norepinephrine, dobutamine, and milrinone; or the insertion of an IABP during separation from CPB. Support was implemented by the anesthesia care team as clinically indicated. Comprehensive TEE examinations were conducted before CPB in all patients according to published guidelines and subsequently reviewed by a single, independent operator. MEASUREMENTS and MAIN RESULTS: Inotropic support was used in a total of 394 patients (39%) at separation from CPB. The study identified 6 significant, independent predictors of inotrope use: (1) Wall Motion Score Index, (2) combined CABG and mitral valve repair or replacement surgery, (3) left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, (4) reoperation, (5) moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation, and (6) aortic cross-clamp time. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating data from a comprehensive intraoperative TEE examination, the authors identified 6 reproducible factors that independently predict the use of inotropic support at separation from CPB.     

Emergency myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: survival benefits of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with increased operative mortality. It has been suggested that this mortality might be reduced by performing the operation without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Between January 1992 and April 1998, 77 patients underwent emergency CABG within 48 h of AMI. Thirty seven were operated on with CPB, and 40 without CPB. The two groups were similar regarding age, gender, left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP; 50%). The mean number of grafts/patient was 3 in the CPB group, and 1.9 in the No-CPB group (P<0.0001). RESULTS: Operative mortality in the CPB group was 24% (nine of 37) compared to 5% (two of 40) without CPB (P=0.015). Follow-up ranged between 6 and 66 months. There were no late deaths in the CPB group compared to nine (22%) in the No-CPB group (P<0.0066). Patients operated on with CPB had lower rates of recurrent angina (0 versus 15%; P=0.04) and re-interventions (0 versus 15%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that CABG without CPB is the preferred method of myocardial revascularization, due to the fact that it carries lower mortality than CABG with CPB. The trade-off includes increased rates of recurrent angina, re-interventions and late mortality.     

Optimal timing of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump support in high-risk coronary patients.

BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment, on outcome and cost, in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting have been demonstrated. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to determine the optimal timing for preoperative IABP support in a cohort of high-risk patients. METHODS: Sixty consecutive high-risk patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (presenting with two or more of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30, unstable angina, reoperation, or left main stenosis greater than 70%) entered the study. Thirty patients did not receive preoperative IABP (controls), 30 patients had preoperative IABP therapy starting 2 hours (T2), 12 hours (T12), or 24 hours (T24), by random assignment, before the operation. Fifty patients had preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction mean, less than 0.30 (less than 0.26+/-0.08), (n = 40) unstable angina, 28% (n = 17) left main stenosis, and 32% (n = 19) were reoperations. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass was shorter in the IABP groups. There was one death in the IABP group and six in the control group. The complication rate for IABP was 8.3% (n = 5) without group differences. Cardiac index was significantly higher postoperatively (p<0.001) in patients with preoperative IABP treatment compared with controls. There were no significant differences between the three IABP subgroups at any time. The incidence of postoperative low cardiac output was significantly lower in the IABP groups (p<0.001). Intubation time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital was shorter in the IABP groups (p = 0.211, p<0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no differences between the IABP subgroups in any of the studied variables. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting was confirmed. There were no differences in outcome between the subgroups; therefore, at 2 hours preoperatively, IABP therapy can be started.     

Benefit to quality of life after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: Whether the clinical outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery is superior to on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is still a matter of debate. However with the considerable reduction of mortality associated with CABG surgery in recent years, more subtle outcome indicators such as quality of life (QOL) become more important. The aim of this study was to compare midterm QOL after OPCABG with that after CABG procedures and with an age- and sex-matched standard population. METHODS: Quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire for 504 consecutive patients after CABG (n = 438) and OPCABG (n = 66) operated on between June 1999 and November 2000 at our institution. RESULTS: Except for single-vessel disease, which was more frequent in OPCABG compared with CABG procedures (13.6% versus 6.8%; p <0.01), the preoperative variables were similar. Median EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) was 3.2 +/- 1.3 in the CABG group compared with 3.0 +/- 0.8 in the OPCABG group (p = not significant). After a mean follow-up of 10.8 +/- 0.5 months physical role function (73.5 +/- 38.3 versus 45.3 +/- 41.6; p <0.01) and emotional role function (75.3 +/- 40.3 versus 61.0 +/- 43.9; p <0.01) were significantly better in OPCABG than in CABG patients. Compared with a standard population, OPCABG patients were significantly impaired in emotional role function and CABG patients in physical and emotional role function. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm QOL after myocardial revascularization is fairly well preserved compared with an age- and sex-matched standard population and is superior after OPCABG compared with CABG. Whether this is only due to avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass remains to be elucidated.     

Elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass improves early survival for multivessel coronary artery bypass patients

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery performed without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is currently increasing in clinical practice. Decreased morbidity associated with off-pump (OP) CABG in selected risk groups examined in relatively small, single institution groups has been the focus of most recent studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the independent impact of CPB on early survival in all isolated multivessel CABG patients undergoing surgery in two large institutions with established experience in OPCABG techniques. METHODS: A review of two large databases employed by multiple surgeons in the hospitals of two institutions identified 8,758 multivessel CABG procedures performed from January 1998 through July 2000. In all, 8,449 procedures were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the relative impact of CPB on mortality independent of known risk factors for mortality. Procedures were also divided into two treatment groups based on the use of CPB: 6,466 had CABG with CPB (CABG-CPB), 1,983 had CABG without CPB (OPCABG). Disparities between groups were identified by univariate analysis of 17 preoperative risk factors and treatment groups were compared by Parsonnet's risk stratification model. Finally, computer-matched groups based on propensity score for institution selection for OPCABG were combined and analyzed by a logistic regression model predicting risk for mortality. RESULTS: CABG-CPB was associated with increased mortality compared with OPCABG by univariate analysis, 3.5% versus 1.8%, despite a lower predicted risk in the CABG-CPB group. CPB was associated with increased mortality by multiple logistic regression analysis with an odds ratio of 1.79 (95% confidence interval = 1.24 to 2.67). An increased risk of mortality associated with CPB was also determined by logistic regression analysis of the combined computer-matched groups based on OPCABG-selection propensity scores with an odds ratio of 1.9 (95% confidence interval = 1.2 to 3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of CPB improves early survival in multivessel CABG patients. Rigorous attempts to statistically account for selection bias maintained a clear association between CPB and increased mortality. Larger multiinstitutional studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the most appropriate application of OPCABG.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases morbidity and mortality in a selected group of high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: The ideal indication for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) has yet to be defined. High-risk surgical patients may benefit the most when cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross clamping, and cardioplegic arrest are avoided. The aim of this study was to determine whether off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting might decrease the operative morbidity and mortality in a select group of high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: Utilizing a Parsonnet risk stratification model we analyzed prospectively collected data on a cohort of high-risk coronary artery disease patients, which were operated on with beating-heart technology by the same group of surgeons in a tertiary care university medical center. High-risk patients were defined as those with a Parsonnet score of 15 or greater. RESULTS: Fifty-seven multivessel disease OPCABG patients (over a period of 2 years) had markedly increased Parsonnet scores (24.3 +/- 10.6). The average ejection fraction of the patients was 42% (+/-12.3) and their age ranged from 52 to 85 years (mean 70.6 +/- 10.4, 26% women). Unstable angina was present in 42 patients (74%) and 10 patients underwent OPCABG within 24 hours of the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction. In addition to severe coronary artery disease 32% of the patients presented with congestive heart failure, insulin-dependent diabetes (18%), renal failure (22%), peripheral vascular disease (31%), pulmonary disease (18%), and neurologic disorders (14%). An average of 2.6 +/- 0.9 grafts/patient were performed and the posterior descending artery or marginal branches of the circumflex artery or both were grafted in 90%. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.5% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: OPCABG can be performed with a reasonable low morbidity and mortality in this select group of high-risk patients. OPCABG is a reasonable, and might even be preferable, operative strategy in this high-risk group of patients.     

Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of complete revascularization on the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) as compared with the standard operation with CPB in elective low-risk patients with multivessel disease has not been clearly demonstrated in a prospective trial. METHODS: Eighty selected low-risk patients were enrolled. In preoperative study with coronary angiography, the decision was made whether complete revascularization without CPB could be performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive CABG either with (n = 40) or without CPB (n = 40). Randomization criteria were age, sex, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Completeness of revascularization as well as short- and mid-term clinical outcome in a 13.4 +/- 6.5 month follow-up period were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 40 (65%) patients undergoing CABG without CPB underwent complete revascularization. In 5 of these patients (12.5%) suitable vessels were discarded for technical reasons and 9 patients (22.5%) were switched to CABG with CPB owing to the deeply intramyocardial course of target vessels (n = 5) or to hemodynamic instability (n = 4). In the group of patients operated on with CPB, 34 of 40 patients (85%) received complete revascularization. In 6 patients (15%) suitable vessels were discarded for technical reasons. Mean number of bypass grafts was 3.1 +/- 0.8 with CPB and 2.6 +/- 0.5 without CPB (p = 0.043). Clinical outcome and hospital stay were comparable in both groups. No patient died during the study period. No myocardial infarction was observed. Three patients undergoing CABG without CPB underwent successful PTCA 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: CABG without the use of CPB is effective for complete revascularization in the majority of selected low-risk patients. Nevertheless, it has to be stated that the rate of incomplete revascularization in this early series of CABG without CPB is higher, and compromises the basic principle of complete revascularization.     

High myocardial lactate concentration is associated with poor myocardial function prior to cardiopulmonary bypass

AIM: This study was designed to analyse the relationship between myocardial lactate--determined by microdialysis--and hemodynamics during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with coronary artery disease were enrolled for this prospective, observational study. Microdialysis measurements were performed in the apical region of the heart during periods of 15 to 20 min before, during, and after CPB; hemodynamics and plasma lactate concentrations were determined correspondingly. Correlation analysis revealed a relationship between myocardial lactate concentration and right ventricular ejection fraction at baseline (Spearman's r: 0.6; P=0.02). Patients were thus grouped according to the myocardial lactate concentration at baseline into a high-lactate group (2.5+/-0.7 mmol.l(-1), n=10) and low-lactate group (0.9+/-0.5 mmol.l(-1), n=10). RESULTS: Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was not different between the groups (high-lactate group: 53+/-16%; low-lactate group: 57+/-15%; P=n.s.) Patients in the high-lactate-group had a lower stroke volume index (P=0.005) and right ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.04) before, and higher central venous and pulmonary artery pressures (P<0.01) after CPB. Plasma lactate was significantly higher during CPB in the high-lactate-group (P<0.05). No correlation was observed between myocardial and plasma lactate. Six patients in the high-lactate but none in the low-lactate-group needed inotropic support after weaning from CPB (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data are suggestive of an association between subtle myocardial ischemia--detected by microdialysis--and perioperative myocardial dysfunction in patients undergoing CABG. The microdialysis technique may be a valuable adjunct for monitoring myocardial metabolism during cardiac surgery.     

A prospective evaluation of hemodynamic instability during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: Despite recognized hemodynamic derangements during cardiac displacement, most patients appear to tolerate the off-pump procedure well. However, some patients unpredictably become hemodynamically unstable requiring emergency cardiopulmonary bypass or intra-aortic balloon pump support. After an experience of 5306 multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypasses (OPCABs), this study was undertaken to determine the factors that would identify the patients who were at a higher risk for the procedure. DESIGN: Prospective clinical investigation. SETTING: Tertiary care academic cardiac care center. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred consecutive patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB from September to December 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Various cardiac and extracardiac factors were charted in prespecified data-entry forms. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to determine if any identifiable factors were predictors of a higher risk of unacceptable hemodynamic instability during OPCAB. Institution of IABP support or conversion to CPB were the endpoints of the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 500 patients studied, significant hemodynamic instability developed in 24 (4.8%) patients. IABP support was instituted in 16 (3.2%) patients, and 8 (1.6%) were converted to CPB. Stepwise logistic regression identified ejection fraction <25% (p < 0.001), myocardial infarction of <1-month duration (p = 0.009), congestive heart failure (p = 0.016), and preoperative hemodynamic instability (p = 0.057) as predictors of conversion during OPCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction <25%, myocardial infarction of <1-month duration, congestive heart failure, or preoperative hemodynamic instability constitute the high-risk group for OPCAB.     

主动脉内球囊反搏在高危冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的预防性应用

目的 探讨主动脉内球囊反搏(LABP)在高危冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)围术期预防性应用的效果.方法 41例高危CABG病人围术期应用IABP辅助,其中20例为预防性应用(Y组),21例为CABG围术期发生严重低心排被迫应用(B组).术前两组性别、年龄、体表面积、心功能、射血分数、病变程度基本一致,仅冠心病合并室壁瘤情况,Y组显著高于B组(70%对38.1%P=0.04).结果 Y组与B组生存率为95.0%对85.7%(P=0.31),IABP应用时间为(72.5±28.91)h对(97.47±47.70)h,(P=0.02),术中严重低血压或心律失常发生率5%对66.7%(P<0.0001).术后呼吸机应用时间(22.0±1.6)h对(39.6±2.1)h(P=0.0015)、ICU停留时间(58.0±1.5)h对(98.5±1.9)h(P=0.003).结论 IABP的预防性应用为高危CABG病人提供了安全保障,术中严重低血压或心律失常发生率低,病情恢复快.     

Intraaortic balloon pump therapy facilitates posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

Background. Displacement of the heart to expose posterior vessels during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG, or OPCAB) may impair cardiac function. We used the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) preoperatively to reduce operative risk and to facilitate posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients with left main coronary artery disease (> 75% stenosis), intractable resting angina, postinfarction angina, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 35%), or unstable angina.

Methods. One hundred and forty-two consecutive patients who underwent multivessel OPCAB including posterior vessel revascularization were studied prospectively. The patients were divided into group I (n = 57), which received preoperative or intraoperative IABP, and group II (n = 85), which did not receive IABP. In group I, there were 34 patients with left main coronary artery disease, 24 patients with intractable resting angina, 8 patients with left ventricular dysfunction, 5 patients with postinfarction angina, and 40 patients with unstable angina. Seven patients received intraoperative IABP support owing to hemodynamic instability during OPCAB.

Results. There was no operative mortality in group I and 1 death in group II. The average number of distal anastomoses was not different between group I and group II (3.4 ± 0.9 versus 3.5 ± 0.9, p = not significant). There were no significant differences in the number of posterior vessel anastomoses per patient. There were no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit, hospital stay, and morbidity between the two groups. There was one IABP-related complication in group I.

Conclusions. IABP therapy facilitates posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients, and surgical results are comparable with those in lower-risk patients.     

Usefulness of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: In off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) surgery, the most critical complication is hemodynamic deterioration, which can occur during displacement of the heart to expose the target vessels. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy improves cardiac performance and facilitates access to the target coronary artery while maintaining hemodynamic stability, especially in high-risk patients. METHODS: One hundred thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent OPCABG through sternotomy between April 2000 and July 2003 were studied. We compared the clinical results of 32 patients who underwent preoperative IABP placement (group 1) with those of 101 patients who did not have IABP placement (group 2). Of the 32 patients satisfying the insertion criteria, 15 had critical left main artery disease, 20 had unstable angina, 5 had acute myocardial infarction, and 5 had left ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the average number of distal anastomoses performed between group 1 and group 2 (3.1 +/- 0.8 versus 3.3 +/- 0.9, p = not significant). The complete revascularization rate was 95% in both group. There was no conversion to on-pump surgery in either group. There was no operative death in group 1 and only 1 death in group 2. In group 1, the number of patients who required prolonged ventilatory support (longer than 48 hours) was higher (3 versus 1, p = 0.036), and there was a higher incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (1 versus 0, p = 0.074). There were no IABP-related complications in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IABP therapy for high-risk coronary patients is very effective in preventing hemodynamic instability and providing surgical results comparable with those in moderate- to lower-risk patients.     

Aggressive preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The use of the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting has been traditionally associated with a high complication rate and adverse outcomes. However, recent reports show that many of these catastrophic outcomes can be avoided by preoperatively placing the IABP in high-risk patients. To further validate these reports, we defined a set of liberal criteria for preoperative IABP insertion and applied them to a series of elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Two hundred six consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were retrospectively reviewed. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, an anesthetic protocol for early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, and aggressive diuresis was applied to all patients. Patients who required an urgent operation because of failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, a critical left main stenosis (70% or greater), pronounced left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less), or unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or who required an emergency reoperation received preoperative IABP support. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate for the entire group was 4.4%. There were 97 patients (47%) who received a preoperative IABP (group II) in comparison with 109 patients (53%) who did not fulfill the preoperative insertion criteria (group I). Patients in group II had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 46% versus 59%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (35% versus 17%, p<0.01) and acute myocardial infarction (37% versus 17%, p<0.01) than patients in group I. The average postoperative hospital length of stay for patients in group II was slightly longer than for those in group I (9.0+/-10.5 versus 6.0+/-3.7 days, p<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in complication or mortality rates between the two groups. Only 2 patients (2.2%) had complications related to IABP insertion. Lower extremity ischemia occurred in both patients, and both were treated successfully with thromboembolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Liberal preoperative insertion of the IABP can be performed safely in high-risk elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with results comparable to those in lower risk patients.     

The role of integrated myocardial management in reoperative coronary surgery

This article identifies the effect of integrated myocardial protection on outcomes after first-time repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A consecutive series of 124 repeat CABG procedures were performed between January 1996 and December 1999 with single aortic cross-clamping for all anastomoses and integrated myocardial protection. This included ischemia for heart dissection and distal grafting, and perfusion throughout the remainder of aortic clamping (including warm/cold, substrate/nonsubstrate-enhanced blood cardioplegia, delivered antegrade/retrograde, continuously/intermittently). Mean patient age was 67 +/ - 10 years (median 68) with 61% in New York Heart Association class IV and 23% in class III. Mean ejection fraction (EF) was 45 +/- 10.6% with EF 40% or less in 33% of patients and 30% or less in 20%. An average of 2.5 +/- 0.9 grafts were constructed. Cross-clamp times averaged 72 +/- 22 min and cardiopulmonary bypass time averaged 91 +/- 27 min. The average time from release of cross-clamp it disconnection from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was 10 min. Median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. hospital mortality was 2.4%, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use 3.2%, stroke 0.8%, atrial fibrillation 11%, and reexploration for bleeding 2.4%. Integrated myocardial protection with blood cardioplegia is safe during reoperative coronary surgery. It allows rapid separation from CPB, limited IABP use, and low morbidity and mortality.     

Myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: benefits and drawbacks of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with increased mortality compared with CABG in non-AMI patients. Operating without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) might reduce this mortality. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 1998, 225 patients underwent CABG within 7 days of AMI, 119 with CPB and 106 without. The two groups were similar regarding age, gender, left ventricular dysfunction, and incidence of cardiogenic shock. Mean number of grafts per patient was 3.1 in the CPB group, and 1.7 in the no-CPB group (p < 0.0001). RESULTS: Operative mortality in the CPB group was 12% compared with 3.8% without CPB (p = 0.027). Independent predictors of operative mortality were preoperative use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), nonuse of internal thoracic artery (ITA) to the left anerior descending artery, and the use of less than three grafts. Mortality of patients operated on with CPB within 48 hours of AMI was significantly higher (16.5% vs 4.3%, respectively; p = 0.044). However, patients operated on after 48 hours had similar mortality (5.8% vs 3.4%, respectively). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 84 months. Five-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) of both groups was similar (81%). Patients operated on with CPB had similar rates of recurrent angina; however, they had lower prevalence of reinterventions (0.8% vs 6.3%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that CPB can be used safely for most patients referred for CABG within the first week of AMI. However, for emergency patients operated on within the first 48 hours of symptom onset, we advocate avoiding CPB because it is associated with lower operative mortality.     

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although there has been some evidence supporting the theoretical and practical advantages of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) over the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), it has not yet been determined which group of patients would benefit most from it. It has been advocated recently that high-risk patients could benefit most from avoidance of CPB. The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the efficacy of the OPCAB technique in multi-vessel myocardial revascularization in a large series of high-risk patients. METHODS: The records of 1398 consecutive high-risk patients who underwent primary isolated CABG at Harefield Hospital between August 1996 and December 2001 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were considered as high-risk and included in the study if they had a preoperative EuroSCORE of > or =5. Two hundred and eighty-six patients were operated on using the OPCAB technique while 1112 patients were operated on using the conventional CABG technique with CPB. The OPCAB patients were significantly older than the CPB patients (68.1+/-8.3 vs. 63.7+/-9.9 years, respectively, P<0.001). The OPCAB group included significantly more patients with poor left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction (EF) < or =30%) (P<0.001) and more patients with renal problems (P<0.001). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of grafts between the groups. The CPB patients received 2.8+/-1.2 grafts per patient while OPCAB patients received 2.8+/-0.5 grafts per patient (P=1). Twenty-one (7.3%) OPCAB patients had one or more major complications, while 158 (14.2%) CPB patients (P=0.008) developed major complications. Thirty-eight (3.4%) CPB patients developed peri-operative myocardial infarction (MI) while only two (0.7%) OPCAB patients developed peri-operative MI (P=0.024). The intensive therapy unit (ITU) stay for OPCAB patients was 29.3+/-15.4 h while for CPB patients it was 63.6+/-167.1 h (P<0.001). There were ten (3.5%) deaths in the OPCAB patients compared to 78 (7%) deaths in the CPB patients (P=0.041) within 30 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that using the OPCAB technique for multi-vessel myocardial revascularization in high-risk patients significantly reduces the incidence of peri-operative MI and other major complications, ITU stay and mortality. Even though the OPCAB group included a significantly higher proportion of older patients with poor LV function (EF < or =30%) and renal problems, the beneficial effect of OPCAB was evident.