Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) and susceptibility to gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

The association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and gastric cancer risk has been both confirmed and refuted in a number of published studies. Most of these studies were based on small sample sizes. We carried out a meta-analysis of the research published up to August 2005 to obtain more precise estimates of gastric cancer risk associated with GSTT1 polymorphism. In the present study, 16 case-control studies (with a total of 6717 subjects) were eligible for meta-analysis. There was no evidence of heterogeneity between the studies. The GSTT1 null genotype conferred a 1.06-fold increased risk of gastric cancer, which was not significant (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.19). However, in the analysis of ethnic groups, we observed distinct differences associated with GSTT1 status. Restricting analyses to ethnic groups, the pooled odd ratios for the GSTT1 genotype were 1.27 in Caucasians (95% CI: 1.03-1.57) and 0.98 in Asians (95% CI: 0.86-1.13). Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and GSTT1 are involved in detoxification of a variety of compounds, some that overlap between enzymes and some that are highly specific. To investigate whether the profile of glutathione S-transferase genotypes was associated with risk of gastric cancer, further analyses combining the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes were also carried out. There was a significant trend in risk associated with zero, one and two putative high-risk genotypes (chi2 = 9.326, d.f. = 1, P = 0.0023). Those who had null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 had an increased gastric cancer risk compared with those who had both active genes (odds ratio = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.42-3.10).     

CYP1A1 (Ile462Val), CYP1B1 (Ala119Ser and Val432Leu), GSTM1 (null), and GSTT1 (null) Polymorphisms and Bladder Cancer Risk in a Turkish Population

We aimed to investigate bladder cancer risk with reference to polymorphic variants of cytochrome p450 (CYP)1A1, CYP1B1, glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1, and GSTT1 genes in a case control study. Polymorphismswere examined in 114 bladder cancer patients and 114 age and sex-matched cancer-free subjects. Genotypes weredetermined using allele specific PCR for CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes, and by multiplex PCR and melting curveanalysis for GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. Our results revealed a statistically significant increased bladder cancerrisk for GSTT1 null genotype carriers with an odds ratio of 3.06 (95% confidence interval=1.39-6.74, p=0.006).Differences of CYP1A1, CYP1B1 and GSTM1 genotype frequencies were not statistically significant betweenpatients and controls. However, the specific combination of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and CYP1B1 codon 119risk allele carriers and specific combination of GSTM1 present, GSTT1 null, and CYP1B1 432 risk allele carriersexhibited increased cancer risk in the combined analysis. We did not observe any association between differentgenotype groups and prognostic tumor characteristics of bladder cancer. Our results indicate that inheritedabsence of GSTT1 gene may be associated with bladder cancer susceptibility, and specific combinations ofGSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms may modify bladder cancer risk in the Turkish population,without any association being observed for CYP1A1 gene polymorphism and bladder cancer risk.     

GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) enzymes are involved in conjugation of electrophilic compounds to glutathione, and glutathione S-transferase T 1 (GSTT1) and glutathione S-transferase M 1 (GSTM1) polymorphisms have been implicated as risk factors for prostate cancer. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes on prostate cancer risk in Asians. We searched the PubMed and Wanfang Medical databases to identify published case–control studies investigating the associations of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes with risk of prostate cancer in Asians. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) from individual studies were pooled using fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity. There were 18 studies (2,046 cases, 2,876 controls) on GSTM1 polymorphism, 15 studies (1,677 cases, 2,431 controls) on GSTT1 polymorphism, and 6 studies (675 cases, 853 controls) on GSTM1/GSTT1 interaction analysis. Overall, GSTM1 null genotype was significantly associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians (random effects OR 1.80, 95 % CI 1.48–2.18, P?<?0.001), and GSTT1 null genotype was also significantly associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians (random effects OR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.10–1.80, P?<?0.001). In addition, the GSTM1/GSTT dual null genotype was associated with higher risk of prostate cancer in Asians (random effects OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.59–2.89, P?=?0.007). In conclusion, GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians, and GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are risk factors for the development of prostate cancer.     

Association between glutathione S-transferase M 1 null genotype and risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

Though previous studies investigated the association between glutathione S-transferase M 1 (GSTM1) null genotype and ovarian cancer risk, the effect of GSTM1 null genotype on ovarian cancer risk was still unclear. To comprehensively quantify the association between GSTM1 null genotype and ovarian cancer risk, we performed a meta-analysis. Eleven studies from ten publications were identified from PubMed database. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association. Meta-analysis of the total 11 studies showed that GSTM1 null genotype was not associated with ovarian cancer risk (OR?=?1.03, 95 % CI 0.92–1.14, P?=?0.625). The cumulative meta-analyses showed a trend of no association between GSTM1 null genotype and ovarian cancer risk as information accumulated by year. There was no evidence of publication bias in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the 11 available studies shows that GSTM1 null genotype is not associated with ovarian cancer risk.     

GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genotypes in relation to breast cancer risk and frequency of mutations in the p53 gene.

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes are involved in the metabolism of various carcinogens. Deletion polymorphisms in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes and an A-G polymorphism in the GSTP1 gene were investigated in relation to breast cancer risk in 500 breast cancer patients and 395 controls. The effects of the GST genotypes on the frequency and pattern of p53 mutations in 388 breast carcinomas were also studied. A suggestive trend of increasing risk of breast cancer with increasing number of G alleles of the GSTP1 was observed (P for trend, 0.11). The GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms did not show an association with breast cancer. No increase in risk was observed with a combination of genotypes. A statistically significant association was observed between the GSTT1 genotype and p53 mutation status of the tumors, with patients carrying the GSTT1 null genotype more frequently having mutations in the p53 gene compared with patients with a GSTT1 gene present (24.6% versus 12.4%; P = 0.019). There was also a suggestive trend for the GG genotype of the GSTP1 gene, but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.19). No association was observed with the type or location of mutations. We conclude that the GSTP1 and GSTT1 genes could play a role in carcinogenesis in the breast, possibly through increased frequency of mutations in tumor suppressor genes such as p53.     

Polymorphisms at the glutathione S-transferase GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 loci: risk of ovarian cancer by histological subtype

The phase II glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 catalyse glutathione-mediated reduction of exogenous and endogenous electrophiles. These GSTs have broad and overlapping substrate specificities and it has been hypothesized that allelic variants associated with less effective detoxification of potential carcinogens may confer an increased susceptibility to cancer. To assess the role of GST gene variants in ovarian cancer development, we screened 285 epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 299 unaffected controls for the GSTT1 deletion (null) variant, the GSTM1 deletion (null) variant and the GSTP1 codon 104 A-->G Ile-->Val amino acid substitution variant. The frequencies of the GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphic variants did not vary with tumour behaviour (low malignant potential or invasive) or p53 immunohistochemical status. There was a suggestion that ovarian cancers of the endometrioid or clear cell histological subtype had a higher frequency of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletion genotype than other histological subgroups. The GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genotype distributions did not differ significantly between unaffected controls and ovarian cancer cases (overall or invasive cancers only). However, the GSTM1 null genotype was associated with increased risk of endometrioid/clear cell invasive cancer [age-adjusted OR (95% CI) = 2.04 (1.01-4.09), P = 0.05], suggesting that deletion of GSTM1 may increase the risk of ovarian cancer of these histological subtypes specifically. This marginally significant finding will require verification by independent studies.     

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1, T1 and N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) polymorphisms and urothelial cancer risk with tobacco smoking.

The objective of this study was to examine the association between the genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1, T1 and N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genes and urothelial cancer risk in relation to smoking status. In this study, 325 Japanese patients with urothelial transitional cell carcinoma and 325 healthy controls were compared for frequencies of GSTM1, T1 and NAT2 genotypes. The frequencies of GSTM1 null genotype and NAT2 slow genotype were significantly higher in the cases than in the controls (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.87, adjusted OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.69-5.63, individually). Furthermore, the risk of GSTM1 null genotype and NAT2 slow genotype was higher among smokers (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.15, adjusted OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.96-9.36, individually). The regression analysis of cancer risk as a function of the amount of smoking showed that the susceptibility of people who had GSTM1 null genotype increased from 45 pack-years, while the susceptibility of people with NAT2 intermediate or slow genotype increased rapidly from 25 pack-years, compared with non-smokers. A multiplicative interaction between NAT2 intermediate or slow genotype and pack-years of smoking was found (P<0.001), but GSTM1 null genotype was not (P=0.06). Our results indicate that the GSTM1 null genotype and NAT2 intermediate or slow genotype are associated with an increased risk of urothelial cancer in relation to smoking amounts. Furthermore, the interaction between NAT2 intermediate or slow genotype and pack-years of smoking has a strong impact on urothelial cancer.     

GSTM1 Null Genotype, Red Meat Consumption and Breast Cancer Risk (The Netherlands)

OBJECTIVE: We studied whether polymorphisms in N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 and Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 genes modify the association between meat consumption and breast cancer. METHODS: A nested case control was conducted in a Dutch prospective cohort. Breast cancer cases (229) and controls (264) were frequency matched on age, town and menopausal status. RESULTS: There is no relation between any type of meat consumption ( i.e., total meat, processed meat, fresh meat, red meat and white meat) and breast cancer risk. Neither presence of NAT1 or NAT2 rapid genotype, or GSTT1 null genotype, alone or in combination with meat consumption affects breast cancer risk. Absence of GSTM1 shows 46% increased breast cancer risk (OR = 1.46 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 1.02-2.09)). When stratifying according to combined 'GSTM1 genotype-meat consumption' categories, breast cancer risk is slightly increased with consumption of red meat both in women with genotype GSTM1 presence (OR = 1.49 and 1.75 for intermediate and high versus low consumption) and in GSTM1 null genotype (OR = 1.18 and 1.02). These increases are statistically not significant. In postmenopausal women a suggestion of an effect of red meat consumption is observed: effects are slightly stronger, although still not statistically significant and without a clear dose-response relation: OR = 1.79 (95% CI = 0.92-3.50) and 1.46 (1.46 (95% CI = 0.76-2.82) for intermediate and high compared to low red meat consumption respectively. Reliable evaluation of interaction is not possible due to the small number of cancers. CONCLUSION: GSTM1 null genotype increases breast cancer risk. Red meat consumption slightly increases breast cancer risk, but the relation is not statistically significant and GSTM1, NAT1, NAT2 and GSTT1 polymorphisms do not modify this relation.     

谷胱甘肽转移酶T1和M1基因多态性及吸烟与结直肠癌关系的对照研究

目的　研究谷胱甘肽转移酶 (GSTs)M1、T1基因多态性与结直肠癌易感性的关系。方法12 6例结直肠癌患者和 343例随机抽样的正常对照者 ,应用多重聚合酶链反应 (PCR)方法检测其GSTM1和GSTT1基因多态性 ,采用非条件Logistic回归模型分析基因型、吸烟情况与结直肠癌患病的关系。结果　GSTM1和GSTT1缺陷型基因型在对照人群中的频率分布为 5 5 .5 %和 2 0 .4 %。在GSTT1缺陷型基因型的人群中 ,GSTM1缺陷型患直肠癌风险是非缺陷型者的 9.74倍 (95 %CI为 1.13～83.85 )。现在吸烟者中 ,GSTM1缺陷型基因型患结肠癌的风险是非缺陷型者的 2 .2 2倍 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;GSTT1缺陷型基因型患结肠癌的风险是非缺陷型者的 4 .5 5倍 (95 %CI为 1.14～ 18.17) ,患直肠癌的风险是非缺陷型者的 4 .6 0倍 (95 %CI为 1.11～ 19.11)。结论　GSTM1和GSTT1缺陷型基因型有可能增加结直肠癌的危险性 ,其危险性主要表现在两者的联合作用上 ;环境暴露因素———吸烟和相关代谢酶多态性也表现出增加结直肠癌危险性的联合作用。     

GSTM1、GSTT1基因多态性和吸烟与膀胱癌关系的病例对照研究

目的:应用全人群为基础的病例对照研究探讨GSTM1、GSTT1基因多态性和吸烟与膀胱癌危险性的关系。方法:采用多重PCR方法对404例正常对照和414例膀胱癌病例的基因组DNA进行GSTM1和GSTT1基因分型,应用非条件logistic回归分析方法进行统计分析。结果:与携带GSTM1( )基因型者比,GSTM1(-)基因型的男、女性患膀胱癌危险性分别为1.66(95%CI:1.18～2.33)和1.08(95%CI:0.59～1.98)。同样携带GSTM1(-)基因型,吸烟者比不吸烟者患膀胱癌的危险性更加明显。与不吸烟且携带GSTM1( )基因型男性比,GSTM1(-)基因型的目前吸烟者的OR值为2.99(95%CI:1.56～5.74),而携带GSTM1(-)基因型同时吸烟年限≥40年者OR为4.33(95%CI:2.14～8.73)。尽管女性吸烟例数较少,但携带GSTM1(-)基因型的吸烟女性患膀胱癌危险性显著高于不吸烟的GSTM1( )基因型者,OR值为6.72(95%CI:1.69～26.80)。与不吸烟且携带GSTT1( )基因型男性相比,携带GSTT1(-)基因型的吸烟者患男性膀胱癌危险的OR值为1.38(95%CI:0.79～2.42)。携带GSTT1(-)基因型的吸烟女性患膀胱癌危险性是不吸烟的GSTT1( )基因型者的3.04倍(95%CI:0.77～12.01)。结论:GSTM1(-)基因型能显著增加男性患膀胱癌的风险,该基因型与吸烟可能有一定的联合作用。GSTT1基因型可能与上海市区男、女性膀胱癌无关。     

N-acetyltransferase (NAT1, NAT2) and glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1, GSTT1) polymorphisms in breast cancer

To evaluate the potential association between NAT1/NAT2 polymorphisms and breast cancer, a case-control study was conducted in Korean women (254 cases, 301 controls). NAT1 *4/*10 genotype (42%) was the most common NAT1 genotype in this Korean population. The frequencies of slow, intermediate and rapid NAT2 acetylator genotype were 16, 39 and 44% in cases and 16, 42 and 42% in controls. Neither NAT1 rapid (homozygous or heterozygous NAT1 *10) (OR=1.2, 95% CI=0.8-1.9) nor NAT2 rapid acetylator genotype (OR=1.2, 95% CI=0.8-1.7) showed significant association with breast cancer risk. Although the risk of NAT2 rapid acetylator genotype in postmenopausal women (OR=1.4, 95% CI=0.7-2.8) was higher than that in premenopausal women (OR=1.1, 95% CI=0.7-1.7), those were not statistically significant. However, combinations of NAT1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes showed a significant linear gene-dosage relationship with breast cancer (p for trend=0.04) and those women with NAT2 rapid acetylator and both GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were at the elevated risk (OR=3.1, 95% CI=1.0-9.1). These results suggest that genetic polymorphisms of NAT1 and NAT2 have no independent effect on breast cancer risk, but they modulate breast cancer risk in the presence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes.     

GSTT1 null genotype increases risk of premenopausal breast cancer

The NAT2, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes are known candidate cancer susceptibility markers and have been investigated in breast cancer susceptibility with conflicting results. We conducted a case-control study to investigate the role of NAT2, GSTM1 and GSTT1 in premenopausal breast cancer. Women with the GSTT1 null genotype were found to have a significant 3.15-fold increased risk of breast cancer (95% CI = 1.7-5.8), while GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes were not associated with breast cancer risk. Our results suggest that the GSTT1 null genotype may play a role in early onset breast cancer.     

Genetic determinants in the metabolism of bladder carcinogens in relation to risk of bladder cancer

Genetically determined factors that alter the metabolism of tobacco carcinogens can influence an individual's susceptibility to bladder cancer. The associations between the genotypes of glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1, GSTP1, GSTT1 and N-acetyltransferase (NAT) 1 and the phenotypes of NAT2 and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and bladder cancer risk were examined in a case-control study involving 731 bladder cancer patients and 740 control subjects in Los Angeles County, California. Individual null/low-activity genotypes of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 were associated with a 19-48% increase in odds ratio (OR) of bladder cancer. The strongest association was noted for GSTM1 [OR for the null genotype = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-1.83]. When the three GST genes were examined together, there was a monotonic, statistically significant association between increasing number of null/low-activity genotypes and risk (P for trend = 0.002). OR (95% CI) for one and two or more null/low-activity GST genotypes was 1.42 (1.12-1.81) and 1.71 (1.25-2.34), respectively, relative to the absence of null/low-activity GST genotype. NAT2 slow acetylation was associated with doubled risk of bladder cancer among individuals with known high exposures to carcinogenic arylamines (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.12-3.69, P = 0.02). The effect of NAT2 slow acetylation was even stronger in the presence of two or more null/low-activity GST genotypes. There were no associations between bladder cancer risk and NAT1 genotype or CYP1A2 phenotype.     

Association of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms with the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene superfamily encodes for enzymes involved in conjugation of electrophilic compounds to glutathione. Several polymorphisms in the GST genes have been implicated as risk factors for prostate cancer. We did a meta-analysis of 11 studies with GSTM1 genotyping (2,063 prostate cancer cases and 2,625 controls), 10 studies with GSTT1 genotyping (1,965 cases and 2,554 controls), and 12 studies with GSTP1 genotyping (2,528 cases and 3,076 controls). The random effects odds ratio was 1.08 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.93-1.25, no significant between-study heterogeneity] for the GSTM1 null versus nondeleted genotype and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73-1.12; P = 0.03 for heterogeneity) for the GSTT1 null versus nondeleted genotype. Overall, the random effects odds ratio was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.90-1.21; P < 0.01 for heterogeneity) for the GSTP1-Val versus GSTP1-Ile allele. For all three polymorphisms, there was a trend for the presence of an association in the earliest published studies, but this did not seem to be validated in subsequent research. For GSTT1, larger studies gave different results than smaller ones. The meta-analysis shows that these three polymorphisms are unlikely to be major determinants of susceptibility to prostate cancer on a wide population basis.     

The association between polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1 and GSTT1) and lung cancer outcome

BACKGROUND: Polymorphisms in the glutathione S-transferase (GST) family may be associated with increased risk of lung cancer, somatic changes in lung tumour tissue, and survival. We evaluated survival according to GST polymorphism in lung cancer patients. METHODS: We studied DNA polymorphisms of 81 primary lung cancer patients at 2 glutathione-related loci: GSTM1, and GSTT1 that encode glutathione S-transferase-mu, and glutathione S-transferase- square. The presences of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes were assayed by PCR. Kaplan-Meier with log rank tests, and Cox regression models were applied in the analysis. RESULTS: The median age of 75 males and 6 females was 60 years. Median survival of the whole population was 8 months. In the first presentation, none of the patients with GSTT1 null genotype but 30 percent of the patients with GSTT1-positive genotype had liver metastasis (p < 0.01) but GSTT1 genotype was not associated with survival. Sputum (p < 0.01) was more common in patients with GSTM1 null genotype. Subjects with the GSTM1-null genotype had shorter survival. Using a Cox proportional hazard model, GSTM1, tumor (T) factor and thoracic irradiation status were identified as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results showed that GSTM1-null genotype was associated with shorter survival.     

SHORT COMMUNICATION: Glutathione S-transferase GSTT1 genotypes and susceptibility to cancer: studies of interactions with GSTM1 in lung, oral, gastric and colorectal cancers

Allelism in glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 has beensuggested as a risk factor in various cancers. Accordingly,we describe a group of case-control studies carried out to identifyassociations between GSTT1 genotypes and susceptibility to lung,oral, gastric and colorectal cancers. The frequencies of theputatively high risk GSTT1 null genotype were not increasedin the lung, oral or gastric cancer cases compared with controlsbut the frequency of this genotype was significantly increased(P = 0.0011, odds ratio = 1.88) in the colorectal cancer cases.No significant interactions between the GSTT1 and GSTM1 nullgenotypes were identified in the cancer groups studied. Indeed,no significant associations between GSTM1 genotypes and susceptibilitywere identified though further evidence was obtained that theprotective effect of GSTM1^*A and GSTM1^*B is not equal. The datacomplement studies showing that GSTT1 null is associated withan increased susceptibility to total ulcerative colitis andsuggests that this enzyme is important in the detoxificationof unidentified xenobiotics in the large intestine.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1 and P1 polymorphisms: susceptibility and outcome in lung cancer patients

The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a superfamily of genes whose products are phase II enzymes, catalyzing the conjugation of reactive intermediates to soluble glutathione. Some of the GSTs are polymorphic and may play a role in lung cancer susceptibility. We investigated whether genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genes modulated lung cancer risk and affect survival among lung cancer patients. We determined the GST genotypes in 422 study subjects, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Logistic Regression analysis was carried out to find the association of various polymorphisms and GSTs and lung cancer. The influence of the genetic polymorphisms on patient survival was estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier survival function. Cox Proportional Hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for deaths. GSTT1 -/- genotype conferred a higher odds ratio of 2.9 (P = 0.001) compared to the GSTT1+/+. So also, the GSTP1 GG genotype too had higher risk compared to the GSTP1 AA genotype (OR = 2.3, P = 0.033). When the combined GST M1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 genotypes were examined, patients with the combinations GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null had a significant OR of 3.6. So also the combinations GSTT1-/- GSTP1 AA (P = 0.005) and GSTT1-/- GSTP1 AG/GG (P = 0.001) came out to be significant. There were some significant interactions between GST genotypes with tobacco smoking and also for clinicopathological factors. Regarding survival analysis, no association of GSTM1 or GSTP1 genes with survival was noted. The GSTT1 -/- genotype along with stage was significantly associated with overall survival and found to be an independent prognostic factors for shorter lung cancer survival.     

Effects of glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 and GSTT1 genotypes on urothelial cancer risk.

The M1 member of the mu class of the glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1) gene is present in about 50% of individuals. GSTT1, a member of the theta class, which has been recently shown to be polymorphic, is expressed in 35-90% of individuals. In this study, 145 Japanese patients with urothelial transitional cell carcinoma and 145 healthy controls, frequency-matched for age and gender, were compared for frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes. The urothelial cancer risk increased due to the GSTM1 null genotype (odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.79). On the other hand, the OR tended to decrease due to the GSTT1 null genotype, although not significantly. Among individuals of the GSTM1 null genotype, those of the GSTT1-positive genotype had a two-fold risk (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.36-5.05) compared with the GSTT1 null genotype (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.62-2.51). A significant interaction between the GSTM1 genotype and smoking status was found; the GSTM1 null genotype was associated with an increased risk of urothelial cancer among smokers (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.10-3.57).     

Genetic Polymorphism of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and Risk of Prostatic Carcinoma - a Meta-analysis of 7,281 Prostate Cancer Cases and 9,082 Healthy Controls

Genetic polymorphisms constitute one of the reasons behind the racial variation in prostate cancer occurrence. Published studies regarding genetic associations of glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1) and glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1) null deletion polymorphisms with prostatic carcinoma have generated inconsistent results among different populations. To date, even a single meta-analysis is not available representing the association of these genes with prostate cancer in different ethnic groups. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to provide a clear picture of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null deletion and risk of prostate cancer among different ethnic groups (i.e. Asians, Europeans, Americans, Africans and Eurasians). A systematic search was performed with the help of various search engines to find out the all the recent studies (2004 to 2015) evaluating the role of GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion in prostate cancer development. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of a total of 34 studies with 7,281 cases and 9,082 controls was analyzed using STATA and MedCalc software. Overall, GSTM1 deletion (OR 3.67; CI 1.39-9.85; P= 0.001) was strongly associated with prostatic cancer. In the sub group analysis GSTM1 null deletion was also significantly associated with prostate cancer among Asians (OR 4.84; CI 1.08-21.5; P= 0.03), Eurasians (OR 17.69; CI 9.87-31.70; <0.001) and Americans (OR 0.11; CI 0.01-1.06; P= 0.05). No association was observed among Europeans (P=0.42) and Africans (P= 0.40). As a whole GSTT1 null deletion (OR 0.85; CI 0.28-2.58; P= 0.77) did not show anyt significant association with prostate cancer risk among different populations. When the data were stratified into different groups, however, Africans demonstrated a significant association of GSTT1 null deletion (OR 1.95; CI 1.57-2.39; <0.001) with prostate cancer, whereas no association was found among Asians (P= 0.90), Americans (P= 0.50), Europeans (P= 0.89) and Eurasians (P= 1.0). In conclusion, both GSTM1 and GSTT1 may contribute to prostate cancer development but GSTM1 may prove to be a stronger candidate risk factor.     

GSTT1 and GSTM1 Deletions,NQO1 C609T Polymorphism and Risk of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Japanese

We conducted a prevalent case-control study with 51 chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cases and 476 controls ‍to investigate the associations between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1), glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) ‍deletions, and the NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) C609T polymorphism with risk of chronic myelocytic ‍leukemia in Japanese. For the GSTT1 deletion, when the GSTT1 positive genotype was defined as the reference, the ‍OR for the GSTT1 deletion genotype was 1.32 (95%CI; 0.74-2.36). For the GSTM1 deletion, when the GSTM1 ‍positive genotype was defined as the reference, the OR for the GSTM1 deletion genotype was 0.95 (95%CI; 0.53- ‍1.69). For NQO1 C609T polymorphism, when the NQO1 609CC genotype was defined as the reference, the ORs for ‍the CT genotype, TT genotype, and CT and TT genotypes combined together were 2.37 (95%CI, 1.21-4.67, P=0.012), ‍1.44 (0.55-3.74, P=0.012) and 2.12 (1.10-4.08, P=0.025), respectively. The present study revealed that the risk of CML ‍was modulated little by GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions, but a statistically significant association between NQO1 C609T ‍polymorphism and CML was observed for Japanese. Incidence case-control studies with a larger statistical power ‍are now required to confirm our findings.