Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be anatomically divided into anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles. Current ACL reconstruction techniques focus primarily on reproducing the AM bundle, but are insufficient in response to rotatory loads. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of in situ force between the two bundles when the knee is subjected to anterior tibial and rotatory loads. Ten cadaveric knees (50+/-10 years) were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor (UFS) testing system. Two external loading conditions were applied: a 134 N anterior tibial load at full knee extension and 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion and a combined rotatory load of 10 Nm valgus and 5 Nm internal tibial torque at 15 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion. The resulting 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee and the in situ forces in the ACL and its two bundles were determined. Under an anterior tibial load, the in situ force in the PL bundle was the highest at full extension (67+/-30 N) and decreased with increasing flexion. The in situ force in the AM bundle was lower than in the PL bundle at full extension, but increased with increasing flexion, reaching a maximum (90+/-17 N) at 60 degrees of flexion and then decreasing at 90 degrees. Under a combined rotatory load, the in situ force of the PL bundle was higher at 15 degrees (21+/-11 N) and lower at 30 degrees of flexion (14+/-6 N). The in situ force in the AM bundle was similar at 15 degrees and 30 degrees of knee flexion (30+/-15 vs. 35+/-16 N, respectively). Comparing these two external loading conditions demonstrated the importance of the PL bundle, especially when the knee is near full extension. These findings provide a better understanding of the function of the two bundles of the ACL and could serve as a basis for future considerations of surgical reconstruction in the replacement of the ACL.     

Rotational instability of the knee: internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test

Introduction  Recently, several publications investigated the rotational instability of the human knee joint under pivot shift examinations and reported the internal tibial rotation as measurement for instrumented knee laxity measurements. We hypothesize that ACL deficiency leads to increased internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction significantly reduces the internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test when compared to the ACL-deficient knee. Methods  In seven human cadaveric knees, the kinematics of the intact knee, ACL-deficient knee, and anatomic single bundle ACL reconstructed knee were determined in response to a 134 N anterior tibial load and a combined rotatory load of 10 N m valgus and 4 N m internal tibial rotation using a robotic/UFS testing system. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way ANOVA test. Results  Single bundle ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation under a simulated KT-1000 test significantly compared to the ACL-deficient knee (P < 0.05). After reconstruction, there was a statistical significant difference to the intact knee at 30° of knee flexion. Under a simulated pivot shift test, anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction could restore the intact knee kinematics. Internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift showed no significant difference in the ACL-intact, ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee. Conclusion  In conclusion, ACL deficiency does not increase the internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test. For objective measurements of the rotational instability of the knee using instrumented knee laxity devices under pivot shift mechanisms, the anterior tibial translation should be rather evaluated than the internal tibial rotation. This study was supported in part by a grant of the German Speaking Association of Arthroscopy (AGA).     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/ MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30 degrees and 60 degrees of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60 degrees of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Comparison of the ACL and ACL graft forces before and after ACL reconstruction an in-vitro robotic investigation

Background?Long-term follow-up studies have indi-cated that there is an increased incidence of arthrosis following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruc-tion, suggesting that the reconstruction may not repro-duce intact ACL biomechanics. We studied not only the magnitude but also the orientation of the ACL and ACL graft forces

Methods?10 knee specimens were tested on a robotic testing system with the ACL intact, deficient, and recon-structed (using a bone-patella tendon-bone graft). The magnitude and orientation of the ACL and ACL graft forces were determined under an anterior tibial load of 130?N at full extension, and 15, 30, 60, and 90° of flexion. Orientation was described using elevation angle (the angle formed with the tibial plateau in the sagit-tal plane) and deviation angle (the angle formed with respect to the anteroposterior direction in the transverse plane)

Results?ACL reconstruction restored anterior tibial translation to within 2.6?mm of that of the intact knee under the 130-N anterior load. Average internal tibial rotation was reduced after ACL reconstruction at all flexion angles. The force vector of the ACL graft was significantly different from the ACL force vector. The average values of the elevation and deviation angles of the ACL graft forces were higher than that of the intact ACL at all flexion angles

Interpretation?Contemporary single bundle ACL reconstruction restores anterior tibial translation under anterior tibial load with different forces (both magni-tude and orientation) in the graft compared to the intact ACL. Such graft function might alter knee kinematics in other degrees of freedom and could overly constrain the tibial rotation. An anatomic ACL reconstruction should reproduce the magnitude and orientation of the intact ACL force vector, so that the 6-degrees-of-freedom knee kinematics and joint reaction forces can be restored.     

In-situ force in the medial and lateral structures of intact and ACL-deficient knees

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the major contributor to limit excessive anterior tibial translation (ATT) when the knee is subjected to an anterior tibial load. However, the importance of the medial and lateral structures of the knee can also play a significant role in resisting anterior tibial loads, especially in the event of an ACL injury. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine quantitatively the increase in the in-situ forces in the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and posterolateral structures (PLS) of the knee associated with ACL deficiency. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric human knees were subjected to a 134-N anterior tibial load at full extension and at 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. The resulting 5 degrees of freedom kinematics were measured for the intact and the ACL-deficient knees. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was used for this purpose, as well as to determine the in-situ force in the MCL and PLS in the intact and ACL-deficient knees. For the intact knee, the in-situ forces in both the MCL and PLS were less than 20 N for all five flexion angles tested. But in the ACL-deficient knee, the in-situ forces in the MCL and PLS, respectively, were approximately two and five times as large as those in the intact knee (P < 0.05). The results of this study demonstrate that, although both the MCL and PLS play only a minor role in resisting anterior tibial loads in the intact knee, they become significant after ACL injury. Received: December 3, 1999 / Accepted: July 19, 2000     

Comparison of the ACL and ACL graft forces before and after ACL reconstruction: an in-vitro robotic investigation

Background Long-term follow-up studies have indi-cated that there is an increased incidence of arthrosis following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruc-tion, suggesting that the reconstruction may not repro-duce intact ACL biomechanics. We studied not only the magnitude but also the orientation of the ACL and ACL graft forces

Methods 10 knee specimens were tested on a robotic testing system with the ACL intact, deficient, and recon-structed (using a bone-patella tendon-bone graft). The magnitude and orientation of the ACL and ACL graft forces were determined under an anterior tibial load of 130 N at full extension, and 15, 30, 60, and 90° of flexion. Orientation was described using elevation angle (the angle formed with the tibial plateau in the sagit-tal plane) and deviation angle (the angle formed with respect to the anteroposterior direction in the transverse plane)

Results ACL reconstruction restored anterior tibial translation to within 2.6 mm of that of the intact knee under the 130-N anterior load. Average internal tibial rotation was reduced after ACL reconstruction at all flexion angles. The force vector of the ACL graft was significantly different from the ACL force vector. The average values of the elevation and deviation angles of the ACL graft forces were higher than that of the intact ACL at all flexion angles

Interpretation Contemporary single bundle ACL reconstruction restores anterior tibial translation under anterior tibial load with different forces (both magni-tude and orientation) in the graft compared to the intact ACL. Such graft function might alter knee kinematics in other degrees of freedom and could overly constrain the tibial rotation. An anatomic ACL reconstruction should reproduce the magnitude and orientation of the intact ACL force vector, so that the 6-degrees-of-freedom knee kinematics and joint reaction forces can be restored.     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30° and 60° of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60° of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30° and 60° of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60° of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Effect of the iliotibial band on knee biomechanics during a simulated pivot shift test.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the iliotibial band (ITB) on the kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) intact and deficient knees and also on the in situ force in the ACL during a simulated pivot shift test. A combination of 10 N-m valgus and 5 N-m internal tibial torques was applied to 10 human cadaveric knees at 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees of flexion using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. ITB forces of 0, 22, 44, and 88 N were also applied. An 88 N ITB force significantly decreased coupled anterior tibial translation of ACL deficient knees by 32%-45% at high flexion angles, but did not have a significant effect at low flexion angles. Further, an 88 N ITB force significantly decreased in situ forces in the ACL at all flexion angles by 23%-40%. These results indicate that during the pivot shift test, the ITB can improve tibial reduction at high flexion angles while not affecting subluxation at low flexion angles. Additionally, the action of the ITB as an ACL agonist suggests that its use as an ACL graft might hinder knee stability in response to rotatory load.     

Joint kinematics and in situ forces after single bundle PCL reconstruction: a graft placed at the center of the femoral attachment does not restore normal posterior laxity

Introduction: Femoral tunnel placement has a great influence on the clinical outcome after PCL reconstruction. Materials and methods: Using a robotic/universal force moment sensor (UFS) testing system, we examined joint kinematics and in situ forces of human knees following soft-tissue single bundle PCL reconstruction fixed at the center of the femoral attachment. Results: Posterior tibial translation significantly increased at all flexion angles after transsection of the posterior cruciate ligament (p<0.05). PCL reconstruction resulted in significantly less posterior tibial translation at all flexion angles when compared to the PCL deficient knee (p<0.05). The differences in the in situ force between the intact ligament and the reconstructed graft were statistical significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Single bundle PCL reconstruction with a soft-tissue graft fixed at the center of the femoral attachment is able to reduce the posterior tibial translation significantly. However, it cannot restore kinematics of the intact knee and in situ forces of the intact PCL.     

The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon . A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament to resist anterior tibial and rotational loads. We hypothesized that current reconstruction techniques, which are designed mainly to provide resistance to anterior tibial loads, are less effective in limiting knee instability in response to combined rotational loads. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen young human cadaveric knees (from individuals with a mean age [and standard deviation] of 37 +/- 13 years at the time of death) were tested with use of a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The loading conditions included (1) a 134-N anterior tibial load with the knee at full extension and at 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion, and (2) a combined rotational load of 10 N-m of valgus torque and 10 N-m of internal tibial torque with the knee at 15 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion. The kinematics of the knees with an intact and a deficient anterior cruciate ligament, as well as the in situ force in the intact anterior cruciate ligament, were determined in response to both loads. Each knee then underwent reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of a quadruple semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft and was tested. A second reconstruction was performed with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, and the same knee was tested again. The kinematics of the reconstructed knees and the in situ forces in both grafts were determined. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that both reconstructions were successful in limiting anterior tibial translation under anterior tibial loads. Furthermore, the mean in situ forces in the grafts under a 134-N anterior tibial load were restored to within 78% to 100% of that in the intact knee. However, in response to a combined rotational load, reconstruction with either of the two grafts was not as effective in reducing anterior tibial translation. This insufficiency was further revealed by the lower in situ forces in the grafts, which ranged from 45% to 65% of that in the intact knee. CONCLUSIONS: In current reconstruction procedures, the graft is placed close to the central axis of the tibia and femur, which makes it inadequate for resisting rotational loads. Our findings suggest that improved reconstruction procedures that restore the anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament may be needed.     

Single– versus two–femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: Biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator

Purpose: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with multistrand autogenous hamstring tendons has been widely performed using a single femoral socket (SS), it is currently advocated to individually reconstruct 2 bundles of the ACL using 2 femoral sockets (TS). However, the difference in biomechanical characteristics between them is unknown. The objective of this study was to clarify their biomechanical differences. Type of Study: This is a cross-over trial using cadaveric knees. Methods: Seven intact human cadaveric knees were mounted in a robotic simulator developed in our laboratory. By applying anterior and posterior tibial load up to ± 100 N at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, tibial displacement and load were recorded. After cutting the ACL, the knees underwent ACL reconstruction using TS, followed by that using SS, with 44 or 88 N of initial grafts tension at 20° of flexion. The above-mentioned tests were performed on each reconstructed knee. Results: The tibial displacement in the TS technique was significantly smaller than that in the SS at smaller flexion angles in response to anterior and posterior tibial load of ± 100 N, and the in situ force in the former was significantly greater than that in the latter at smaller flexion angles. Furthermore, in the TS technique, the posterolateral graft acted dominantly in extension, while the anteromedial graft mainly resisted against anterior tibial load in flexion. However, in the SS technique, the anteriorly located graft functioned more predominantly than the posteriorly located graft at all flexion angles. Conclusions: The ACL reconstruction via TS using quadrupled hamstring tendons provides better anterior-posterior stability compared with the conventional reconstruction using a single socket.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 17, No 7 (September), 2001: pp 708–716     

Tension patterns of the anteromedial and posterolateral grafts in a double‐bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The two functional bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), namely, the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles, must work in concert to control displacement of the tibia relative to the femur for complex motions. Thus, the replacement graft(s) for a torn ACL should possess similar tension patterns. The objective of the study was to examine whether a double‐bundle ACL reconstruction with the semitendinosus‐gracilis autografts could replicate the tension patterns of those for the intact ACL under controlled in vitro loading conditions. By means of a robotic/universal force moment sensor (UFS) testing system, the in situ force vectors (both magnitude and direction) for the AM and PL bundles of the ACL, as well as their respective replacement grafts, were determined and compared on nine human cadaveric knees. It was found that double‐bundle ACL reconstruction could closely replicate the in situ force vectors. Under a 134‐N anterior tibial load, the resultant force vectors for the intact ACL and the reconstructed ACL had a difference of 5 to 11 N (p > 0.05) in magnitude and 1 to 13° (p > 0.05) in direction. Whereas, under combined rotatory loads of 10‐N‐m valgus and 5‐N‐m internal tibial torques, the corresponding differences were 10 to 16 N and 4° to 11°, respectively. Again, there were no statistically significant differences except at 30° of flexion where the force vector for the AM graft had a 15° (p < 0.05) lower elevation angle than did the AM bundle. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27: 879–884, 2009     

Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Despite the numerous long-term success reports of posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), recent retrieval studies of various PS TKA designs revealed wear and deformation on the anterior side of the tibial post. This study investigated the mechanisms of anterior impingement of the post with the femoral component. Seven cadaveric knees were tested to study kinematics and tibial post biomechanics during simulated heel strike using an in vitro robotic testing system. Intact knee kinematics and in situ anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) forces were determined at hyperextension (0 degree to -9 degrees) and low flexion angles (0 degrees to 30 degrees) under the applied loads. The same knee was reconstructed using a PS TKA. The kinematics and the tibial post contact forces of the TKA were measured under the same loading condition. The ACL in the intact knee carried load and contributed to knee stability at low flexion angles and hyperextension. After TKA, substantial in situ contact forces (252.4 +/- 173 N at 9 degrees of hyperextension) occurred in the tibial post, indicating anterior impingement with the femoral component. Consequently, the TKA showed less posterior femoral translation compared to the intact knee after the impingement. At 9 degrees of hyperextension, the medial condyle of the intact knee translated 0.1 +/- 1.1 mm whereas the medial condyle of the TKA knee translated 5.6 +/- 6.9 mm anteriorly. The lateral condyle of the intact knee translated 1.5 +/- 1.0 mm anteriorly whereas the lateral condyle of the TKA knee translated 2.1 +/- 5.8 mm anteriorly. The data demonstrated that anterior tibial post impingement functions as a substitute for the ACL during hyperextension, contributing to anterior stability. However, anterior post impingement may result in additional polyethylene wear and tibial post failure. Transmitted impingement forces might cause backside wear and component loosening. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of the tibial post function at low flexion angles may help to further improve component design and surgical techniques and thus enhance knee stability and component longevity after TKA.     

Anatomical versus Non-Anatomical Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study of Comparison of Knee Stability

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the initial stability of anatomical and non-anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine which would better restore intact knee kinematics. Our hypothesis was that the initial stability of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction would be superior to that of non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal rotation of the tibia were measured with a computer navigation system in seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees under two testing conditions (manual maximum anterior force, and a manual maximum anterior force combined with an internal rotational force). Tests were performed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion with the ACL intact, the ACL transected, and after reconstruction of one side of a pair with either anatomical or non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Results

Under manual maximal anterior force, both reconstruction techniques showed no significant difference of ATT when compared to ACL intact knee state at 30° of knee flexion (p > 0.05). Under the combined anterior and internal rotatory force, non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction showed significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p < 0.05). In contrast, central anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction showed no significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p > 0.05). Internal rotation of the tibia showed no significant difference in the ACL intact, the ACL transected, non-anatomical reconstructed and anatomical reconstructed knees.

Conclusions

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction restored the initial stability closer to the native ACL under combined anterior and internal rotational forces when compared to non-anatomical ACL single bundle reconstruction.     

The effect of initial graft tension on the biomechanical properties of a healing ACL replacement graft: a study in goats.

While a number of in vitro studies have shown that the tension on an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) replacement graft at the time of fixation has an affect on joint stability, most in vivo studies have reported little or no long-term difference in outcome. The objectives of this study were to (1) establish a large animal model in which differences in knee stability are present at time-zero after ACL reconstruction with grafts fixed at a low (5 N) and high (35 N) initial tension and to (2) quantitatively determine if these initial effects remain after six weeks of healing and if the tensile properties of an ACL replacement graft are influenced by initial graft tension. Seventeen skeletally mature female Saanan breed goats were used. Using the robotic/UFS testing system, the knee kinematics and in situ forces in the replacement graft in response to an externally applied 67 N anterior-posterior (A-P) tibial load were evaluated at time-zero and after six weeks of healing. Afterward, the femur-ACL graft-tibia complexes (FGTCs) from the six-week group were tested under uniaxial tension so that the stress relaxation and structural properties of the FGTC were obtained.At time-zero, knees fixed with a high initial graft tension could better reproduce the A-P translation of the intact knee in response to the 67 N A-P tibial load. Further, in situ forces in these grafts were also closer to those in the intact ACL under the same external loading condition. After six weeks of healing, the A-P translation of the knee and in situ forces in the replacement grafts became similar for the low and high tension groups, while both were significantly different from controls. Further, the percentage of stress relaxation as well as the stiffness, ultimate load at failure, ultimate elongation at failure, and energy absorbed of the FGTCs for both reconstruction groups were not significantly different from each other, but were significantly different from controls. These results demonstrate that while the high initial graft tension could better replicate the normal knee kinematics at time-zero, these effects may diminish during the early graft healing process.     

Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement

Purpose: To study how well an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixed at the 10 and 11 o'clock positions can restore knee function in response to both externally applied anterior tibial and combined rotatory loads by comparing the biomechanical results with each other and with the intact knee. Type of Study: Biomechanical experiment using human cadaveric specimens. Methods: Ten human cadaveric knees (age, 41±13 years) were reconstructed by placing a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft at the 10 and 11 o'clock positions, in a randomized order, and then tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Two external loading conditions were applied: (1) 134 N anterior tibial load with the knee at full extension, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and (2) a combined rotatory load of 10 N-m valgus and 5 N-m internal tibial torque with the knee at 15° and 30° of flexion. The resulting kinematics of the reconstructed knee and in situ forces in the ACL graft were determined for each femoral tunnel position. Results: In response to a 134-N anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation (ATT) for both femoral tunnel positions was not significantly different from the intact knee except at 90° of knee flexion as well as at 60° of knee flexion for the 10 o'clock position. There was no significant difference in the ATT between the 10 and 11 o'clock positions, except at 90° of knee flexion. Under a combined rotatory load, however, the coupled ATT for the 11 o'clock position was approximately 130% of that for the intact knee at 15° and 30° of flexion. For the 10 o'clock position, the coupled ATT was not significantly different from the intact knee at 15° of flexion and approximately 120% of that for the intact knee at 30° of flexion. Coupled ATT for the 10 o'clock position was significantly smaller than for the 11 o'clock position at 15° and 30° of flexion. The in situ force in the ACL graft was also significantly higher for the 10 o'clock position than the 11 o'clock position at 30° of flexion in response to the same loading condition (70 ± 18 N v 60 ± 15 N, respectively). Conclusions: The 10 o'clock position more effectively resists rotatory loads when compared with the 11 o'clock position as evidenced by smaller ATT and higher in situ force in the graft. Despite the fact that ACL grafts placed at the 10 or 11 o'clock positions are equally effective under an anterior tibial load, neither femoral tunnel position was able to fully restore knee stability to the level of the intact knee.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 19, No 3 (March), 2003: pp 297–304     

Anterolateral rotational knee instability: role of posterolateral structures

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the anterolateral rotational instability (ALRI) of the human knee after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and after additional injury of the different components of the posterolateral structures (PLS). It was hypothesized that a transsection of the ACL will significantly increase the ALRI of the knee and furthermore that sectioning the PLS [lateral collateral ligament (LCL), popliteus complex (PC)] will additionally significantly increase the ALRI. Materials and methods Five human cadaveric knees were used for dissection to study the appearance and behaviour of the structures of the posterolateral corner under anterior tibial load. Ten fresh-frozen human cadaver knees were subjected to anterior tibial load of 134 N and combined rotatory load of 10 Nm valgus and 4 Nm internal tibial torque using a robotic/universal force moment sensor (UFS) testing system and the resulting knee kinematics were determined for intact, ACL-, LCL- and PC-deficient (popliteus tendon and popliteofibular ligament) knee. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way ANOVA test with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. Results Sectioning the ACL significantly increased the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation under a combined rotatory load at 0 and 30° flexion (P < 0.05). Sectioning the LCL further increased the ALRI significantly at 0°, 30° and 60° of flexion (P < 0.05). Subsequent cutting of the PC increased the ATT under anterior tibial load (P < 0.05), but did not increase the ALRI (P > 0.05). Conclusion The results of the current study confirm the concept that the rupture of the ACL is associated with ALRI. Current reconstruction techniques should focus on restoring the anterolateral rotational knee instability to the intact knee. Additional injury to the LCL further increases the anterior rotational instability significantly, while the PC is less important. Cautions should be taken when examining a patient with ACL rupture to diagnose injuries to the primary restraints of tibial rotation such as the LCL. If an additional extraarticular stabilisation technique is needed for severe ALRI, the technique should be able to restore the function of the LCL and not the PC. This study is a winner of the AGA DonJoy Award 2006.     

Soft-tissue graft fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the effect of tibial insertion site on joint kinematics and in situ forces using a robotic/UFS testing system

Introduction Surgical reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is recommended in acute injuries that result in severe tibial subluxation and instability. The surgical outcome level may be affected by the tibial fixation site. In response to a 110-N posterior tibial load, kinematics and in situ forces of anatomical soft-tissue graft fixation in single-bundle PCL reconstruction using an interference screw fixation are significantly closer to those in the intact knee than with extracortical fixation with two staples.Materials and methods Using a robotic/universal force moment sensor (UFS) testing system, we examined joint kinematics and in situ forces of porcine knees following single-bundle PCL reconstruction fixed at two different tibial fixation sites: anatomical interference screw and extracortical fixation.Results The site of the tibial graft fixation had significant effect on the resulting posterior displacement and in situ forces of the graft. Both PCL reconstruction techniques reduced the posterior tibial translation significantly. Proximal fixation techniques provided significantly less posterior tibial translation than extracortical fixation. Single-bundle PCL reconstruction with an interference screw showed higher in situ forces of the graft than the extracortical fixation.Conclusions The kinematics and in situ forces of a single-bundle PCL reconstruction using an interference screw fixation technique are superior to the primary stability of an extracortical fixation with staples.