GnRH agonist as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction technique cycles: results of a pilot study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate whether intranasal (IN) administration of a GnRH agonist could provide luteal support in IVF/ICSI patients. METHODS: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was performed using hMG/FSH and a GnRH antagonist. Patients were then randomly allocated to either 10,000 IU hCG, followed by vaginal administration of micronized progesterone (3x 200 mg/day) (group A), or 200 microg IN buserelin followed by either 100 microg every 2 days (group B), or 100 microg every day (group C), or 100 microg twice a day (group D), or 100 microg three times a day (group E). Luteal support was continued for 15 days. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were randomized. Groups B and C were discontinued prematurely in view of the short luteal phase. The luteal phase was significantly shorter in groups B, C and D, whereas group E was comparable with group A, 13.5 and 13.0 days, respectively. In the mid-luteal phase, median progesterone levels were significantly lower in groups B, C and D, whereas group E was comparable with group A, 68.9 and 98.0 ng/ml, respectively. Estradiol (E2) was significantly reduced in groups B and D but sustained in group E. In the hCG group, LH levels were undetectable (<0.1 IU/l), whereas LH was detectable and significantly higher in groups C, D and E. Two pregnancies were obtained in the hCG group (two of five), one ectopic and one ongoing. Three pregnancies were obtained in group E, one miscarriage and two ongoing twin pregnancies (three of five). CONCLUSION: IN administration of buserelin may be effective in triggering follicular maturation and providing luteal phase support in patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques (ART).     

Analysis of the bleeding pattern in assisted reproduction cycles with luteal phase supplementation using vaginal micronized progesterone

This study was designed to determine the effects of a vaginal micronized progesterone preparation on bleeding patterns and pregnancy outcomes after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). The study population consisted of 149 consecutive women who had undergone IVF-ICSI using 'long-protocol' stimulation with buserelin-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). A retrospective chart analysis of computerized medical records was undertaken. Vaginal progesterone (200 mg three times daily) was begun the day before oocyte retrieval and continued for a minimum of 16-19 days following human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Occurrence of bleeding following HCG injection, pregnancy rate and outcomes, and serum concentrations of oestradiol were measured. Women undergoing IVF and embryo transfer with ICSI and using vaginal progesterone for luteal support had normal luteal phase lengths (day of HCG minus day of onset of bleeding). In the absence of pregnancy, bleeding occurred after 19.2 +/- 3.9 days (mean +/- SD). Out of the pregnant group only three women bled within 19 days of HCG administration: two had biochemical pregnancies which spontaneously vanished and one evolved to term. The results reflect the normal bleeding pattern to be expected when vaginal progesterone is used for luteal support in IVF and embryo transfer, an approach whose efficacy has been amply proven. No shortened luteal phases were observed using vaginally administered progesterone.     

Analysis of hormonal changes during combined buserelin/HMG treatment

Changes of serum oestradiol, LH and progesterone have been analysed in view of the effect of the GnRH analogue buserelin on the late follicular and early luteal phase of cycles stimulated with combined buserelin/HMG (n = 31) in an IVF-ET/GIFT programme. Patients undergoing cycles with HMG only (n = 57) served as the control group. With the use of the GnRH analogue buserelin, a significantly higher amount of HMG (25 versus 20 ampoules; P less than 0.001) for a significantly longer stimulation period (10 versus 8 days; P less than 0.001) was necessary to achieve the same oestradiol response as seen in HMG cycles. Serum progesterone levels during a three day period before ovulation induction tended to be lower in the combined buserelin/HMG cycles than in cycles with HMG stimulation only. We did not observe any significant difference in the luteal phase progesterone levels of the buserelin/HMG and the HMG group. On the other hand, we found that an inadequate luteal phase in buserelin/HMG cycles could be avoided by HCG administration during the luteal phase. Both the elevation of basal serum LH and a premature LH rise could also be avoided by the use of buserelin.     

Luteal phase support and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

The incidence and statistical associations of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were studied in 304 egg retrievals with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist suppression, gonadotrophin administration and follicular aspiration. In addition to preserving corpus luteum function, the luteal phase administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was associated with a higher incidence of severe OHSS than was supplementation with progesterone alone (12 versus 0%, P less than 0.001). Severe OHSS occurred in 3.7% and 12% of retrievals without and with pregnancy respectively (P less than 0.01). Stepwise logistic regression showed that the occurrence of moderate or severe OHSS was statistically predicted by the log of the serum oestradiol on the day the initial HCG was given (P less than 0.0001), treatment with luteal phase HCG (P less than 0.0003), and fetal number (P less than 0.0079). In the late luteal phase of cycles without luteal HCG, the serum oestradiol concentration was one-tenth and the serum progesterone concentration was one-fifth of the luteal phase value with HCG support (P less than 0.001). Without luteal phase HCG, oestradiol was two-fold higher (P less than 0.001) and progesterone was 1.4-fold higher (P less than 0.005) in pregnant than in non-pregnant women. With luteal phase HCG, oestradiol was 1.4-fold higher in pregnant than in non-pregnant women (P less than 0.05), and progesterone was 1.7-fold higher (P less than 0.001). Oestradiol upper limits of 4400 and 14,700 pmol/l (1200 and 4000 pg/ml) for cycles with and without luteal phase HCG respectively correspond to approximately 5% risk of moderate or severe OHSS with a singleton pregnancy under these conditions.     

Triggering of ovulation in human menopausal gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles: comparison between intravenously administered gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (100 and 500 {micro}g), GnRH agonist (buserelin, 500 {micro}g) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (10 000 IU)

We studied the peri-ovulatory and luteal phases in 38 humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)-stimulated cycles, in which ovulationwas triggered with four different i.v. bolus ovulation triggers:100 µg gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; group A,n = 9), 500 µg GnRH agonist (GnRHa; group B, n = 10),10 000IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; group C, n = 10)and 500 µg GnRH (group D, n = 9). Endogenous luteinizinghormone (LH) surges occurred in all cycles of groups A, B andD. The rise was slowest but highest in group B (P < 0.0001)and lowest in group A. Although the t₀ serum oestradiol valueswere similar in all groups, day +8 oestradiol and day +4 and+8 progesterone concentrations were higher in group C (P <0.05). At day +4 and +8, serum LH concentrations were lowest(P < 0.01) but follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrationswere higher. Clinically, day +8 luteal scores showed a moreconspicuous degree of ovarian hyperstimulation in the HCG group(P = 0.0292). Luteal insufficiency, defined as cycles with progesteroneconcentrations of <8 ng/ml, occurred much more frequentlyin groups A, B and D than in group C (day +4: P < 0.0003;day +8: P < 0.0001), despite progesterone supplementation.Three pregnancies (one in group C and two in group D) and onemoderate case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (ina non-conceptional group D cycle) occurred. These findings showthat (i) ovulation occurs and pregnancy can be achieved followingan endogenous LH surge induced by GnRH and its agonists, (ii)a high frequency of luteal insufficiency occurs in such cycleseven with luteal supplementation and (iii) OHSS cannot be totallyprevented by this approach, although cycles with an endogenousLH surge in general result in fewer subclinical signs of ovarianhyperstimulation.     

Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles. A randomised study

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the value of using a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist prior to exogenous steroid supplementation for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo replacement (FER) cycles. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial of 234 patients undergoing FER cycles was conducted. The study population was randomly divided into two groups according to a computer-generated list. In group A (n = 117), a daily dose of 6 mg of oral estradiol valerate was initiated on menstrual day 1 following pituitary suppression using 400 mcg buserelin acetate daily. In group B (n = 117), the same dose of estradiol valerate was initiated on day 1 of bleeding without prior GnRH agonist therapy. In both groups, ovulation monitoring was not undertaken and progesterone pessaries (800 mg daily) were administrated when the endometrial thickness had reached 8 mm or more with embryo transfer taking place 2 days later. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to cause of infertility, age at stimulation (32.8 +/- 4 vs 33.2 +/- 3.9 years, P = 0.4), basal FSH level (6.3 +/- 1.7 vs 6.4 +/- 2 IU/l, P = 0.5), number of oocytes collected (16.9 +/- 7.3 vs 16.5 +/- 7.4, P = 0.7) and fertilized normally in the retrieval cycle (11.5 +/- 4.9 vs 11 +/- 4.9, P = 0.4) and number of embryos cryopreserved (6.6 +/- 3.6 vs 6.2 +/- 3.6, P = 0.3). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age at frozen replacement (33.6 +/- 4.2 vs 34 +/- 3.9 years, P = 0.4), duration of the proliferative phase (20.7 +/- 8.6 vs 21 +/- 9.2 days, P = 0.7) and number of thawed embryos replaced (2.3 +/- 0.6 vs 2.2 +/- 0.6, P = 0.2). However, compared with group B, group A achieved significantly higher pregnancy (37.6% vs 24%, OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-3.4), clinical pregnancy (24% vs 11.3%, OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-5.5) and live birth rates (20% vs 8.5%, OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.2-8). CONCLUSION: Medicated frozen embryo replacement cycles timed by endometrial thickness measurement alone without monitoring or suppression of ovarian activity are associated with reduced outcome.     

Luteal support with micronized progesterone following in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist: a comparative study between vaginal and oral administration.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of micronized progesterone administered as luteal support following ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization (IVF)- embryo transfer in cycles using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, either orally (200 mgx4/day) or vaginally (100 mgx2/day) and to characterize the luteal phase hormonal profile during such treatments. A total of 64 high responder patients requiring intracytoplasmic sperm injection due to male factor infertility were prospectively randomized into two treatment groups. Patients treated orally or vaginally were comparable in age (31.9 +/- 6.1 versus 30.6 +/- 5.2; mean +/- SD), number of oocytes retrieved (17 +/- 8.2 versus 18 +/- 7.0), and number of embryos transferred (3.1 +/- 1.2 versus 2.7 +/- 0.9) per cycle. Following low dose vaginal treatment, a significantly higher implantation rate (30.7 versus 10.7%, P < 0.01), but similar clinical pregnancy rate (47.0 versus 33.3%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (41.1 versus 20.0%) was observed, compared with oral treatment. In conception cycles, luteal serum progesterone and oestrogen concentrations did not differ between the treatment groups. In non-conception cycles, late luteal progesterone concentrations were significantly lower following vaginal treatment. As low dose micronized progesterone administered vaginally is simple, easy and well tolerated, it could be recommended as the method of choice for luteal support, especially for high responder patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.     

Serum inhibin levels in gonadotrophin stimulated in-vitro fertilization/gamete intra-fallopian transfer cycles.

Serum inhibin concentrations of 64 cycles of in-vitro fertilization--embryo transfer (IVF-ET) or gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) have been analysed retrospectively. No significant difference was observed in serum inhibin levels of cycles stimulated with buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or HMG alone. During the late follicular phase, serum inhibin was higher in cycles resulting in pregnancy than in cycles without a pregnancy (peak values on day +1: 8.3 versus 6.4 IU/ml, respectively). The same difference was found between stimulation cycles resulting in a viable or a non-viable pregnancy (peak values on day +1: 8.3 versus 7.5 IU/ml). However, these differences were not significant. During the early luteal phase, serum inhibin values were similar in these groups of patients. Our results indicate that the use of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue buserelin, in combination with HMG, for ovarian stimulation does not affect inhibin production by granulosa cells in vivo. The late follicular and early luteal concentrations of serum inhibin have to be considered unsuitable as predictors in IVF/GIFT cycles with respect to pregnancy and pregnancy outcome.     

Hormonal and histological evaluation of the luteal phase after combined GnRH-agonist/gonadotrophin treatment for superovulation and luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization.

A hormonal and histological study of the luteal phase was performed in 21 stimulated in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients not undergoing embryo transfer. Ovarian stimulation was carried out with gonadotrophins [follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) + human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)] under pituitary suppression with buserelin. Ovulation was induced with 5000 IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and additional doses of 5000, 2500 and 2500 IU were given on the day of follicular aspiration, and 2 and 5 days later respectively, to support the luteal phase. Supraphysiological levels of oestradiol (E2) and progesterone in plasma were found in the midluteal phase of all women, while prolactin was in the normal range. An endometrial biopsy taken in the late luteal phase was normal in 90.5% (19/21) of patients, most of them (15/19, 79%) having E2 greater than 1500 pg/ml on the day of HCG. Conversely, both patients with defective endometrial biopsies had E2 levels less than 1500 pg/ml.     

GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the efficacy of ovarian hyperstimulation protocols employing a GnRH antagonist to prevent a premature LH rise allowing final oocyte maturation and ovulation to be induced by a single bolus of either a GnRH agonist or hCG. METHODS: A total of 122 normogonadotrophic patients following a flexible antagonist protocol was stimulated with recombinant human FSH and prospectively randomized (sealed envelopes) to ovulation induction with a single bolus of either 0.5 mg buserelin s.c. (n = 55) or 10,000 IU of hCG (n = 67). A maximum of two embryos was transferred. Luteal support consisted of micronized progesterone vaginally, 90 mg a day, and estradiol, 4 mg a day per os. RESULTS: Ovulation was induced with GnRH agonist in 55 patients and hCG in 67 patients. Significantly more metaphase II (MII) oocytes were retrieved in the GnRH agonist group (P < 0.02). Significantly higher levels of LH and FSH (P < 0.001) and significantly lower levels of progesterone and estradiol (P < 0.001) were seen in the GnRH agonist group during the luteal phase. The implantation rate, 33/97 versus 3/89 (P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate, 36 versus 6% (P = 0.002), and rate of early pregnancy loss, 4% versus 79% (P = 0.005), were significantly in favour of hCG. CONCLUSIONS: Ovulation induction with a GnRH agonist resulted in significantly more MII oocytes. However, a significantly lower implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in addition to a significantly higher rate of early pregnancy loss was seen in the GnRH agonist group, most probably due to a luteal phase deficiency.     

Endocrine changes in women conceiving during treatment with an LHRH agonist

We report on eight patients who conceived during pituitary desensitization with buserelin in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Pregnancy was diagnosed between day 12 and 21 of buserelin administration. Analysis of serum luteinizing hormone on day 12 showed that pituitary desensitization occurred in conjunction with increasing production of ovarian steroid hormones. Serum concentrations of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) were less than 10 IU/l on day 1 of buserelin administration for seven of the eight patients. The serum concentration of HCG on day 12 showed a median value of 722 IU/l (range 14.6-798 IU/l). Five of the eight patients were given HCG support (10,000 IU) following the diagnosis of pregnancy--three of these patients have ongoing pregnancies and the remaining two had blighted ova on scan. Of the remaining three patients, one had a singleton pregnancy which miscarried at 9 weeks, one had a blighted ovum on scan and bled per vagina shortly after this, and one bled per vagina prior to a scan being carried out. Our results show that pregnancy can occur during pituitary desensitization with buserelin, despite patients being counselled not to have unprotected intercourse in the cycle during which administration commences. An HCG assay on day 1 of buserelin administration is not helpful. Pregnancy should be suspected when ovarian steroid production persists despite complete pituitary down-regulation.     

A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a luteal phase and early pregnancy supplement.

A luteal phase defect has been demonstrated in cycles stimulated using a protocol including a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). We have conducted a randomized prospective study of luteal and early pregnancy supplementation in 262 women selected for in-vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) or zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). Either intramuscular progesterone in oil (50 mg/day) or intravaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/day) was used as luteal supplement. In association with oestradiol valerate, progesterone administration was initiated from the day before oocyte retrieval until the 12th week of pregnancy. The implantation rate just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) in favour of the group receiving intravaginal progesterone. In the latter group, we observed a higher clinical pregnancy rate (33.6 versus 26.7%, not significant). Despite lower plasma progesterone levels, a lower first trimester abortion rate (P less than 0.05) was found in the intravaginally treated group. Intravaginal micronized progesterone was well tolerated by all patients and appeared more effective than intramuscular progesterone in improving the implantation rate, and in decreasing the incidence of abortions in stimulated cycles including GnRHa.     

Endocrine responses to gonadotrophins after LHRH agonist administration on cycle days 1-4: prevention of premature luteinization

A treatment regime comprising an intranasally administered luteinizinghormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist analogue (buserelin)on cycle days 1–4, followed by gonadotrophin administration[follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG)] resulted in identical oestradiol (E₂) responses comparedwith the reference method using clomiphene citrate (CC) andgonadotrophins. Immediately after analogue administration (day4), buserelin-treated women showed short-lived elevations inserum LH and progesterone concentrations, but in the later follicularphase, the serum LH concentration was lowered compared withthe controls. None of the women treated with analogue displayedelevated serum LH or progesterone concentrations at the timeof injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin. In the earlyluteal phase, these women had higher serum levels of progesteroneand higher progesterone to E2 ratios than the controls, butthe length of the luteal phase was slightly shortened. Hence,in hyperstimulated cycles, 4-day treatment with buserelin causedprofound endocrinological changes: namely, short-term rescueof the corpus luteum, prevention of an endogenous LH rise andpremature luteinization and increased progesterone productionin the early luteal phase     

Comparison of luteal phase profile in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles with or without a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to explore luteal phase hormone profiles in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist therapy during intrauterine insemination (IUI). Forty-one infertile couples were recruited in this randomized clinical study. METHODS: The 19 patients included in group A were treated for 21 cycles with recombinant FSH 150 IU/day starting from day 3 of the cycle and with the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix at the dose of 0.25 mg/day starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of > or =14 mm was seen at ultrasound scan. Cetrorelix was administered until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The 22 patients included in group B were administered recombinant FSH alone at the same dosage for 27 cycles. RESULTS: The two treatment groups showed a similar increase in progesterone concentration during the luteal phase. In the mid-luteal phase (day 6 after HCG), oestradiol concentrations in group B were significantly higher compared with group A (P < 0.05) but the oestradiol:progesterone ratio was similar in the two groups. Serum LH was completely suppressed during the follicular phase only in group A, concomitantly with GnRH antagonist administration. A total of six pregnancies, all ongoing, were achieved (14.3% per patient and 12.2% per cycle), equally distributed in group A and in group B. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonists can be safely administered in gonadotrophin-stimulated IUI cycles without luteal phase supplementation because no deleterious effects of GnRH antagonist administration were noted on luteal progesterone concentration or on the duration of the luteal phase.     

Impact of different progestins on endometrial vascularisation of postmenopausal women. A retrospective image analysis-morphometric study

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the vascularisation of the endometrium is dependent on the administered progestin during sequential hormone replacement therapy. METHODS: Nine women received percutaneous estradiol-17 beta, 1.5 mg/day from days 1 to 24 combined with 200 mg/day micronised progesterone from days 11 to 24 of the treatment cycle. Fifteen women received percutaneous estradiol, 1.5 mg/day from days 1 to 24, combined with 10 mg/day chlormadinone acetate from days 11 to 24. Eleven women received percutaneous estradiol, 50 microg/day from days 1 to 28 combined with percutaneous norethisterone acetate, 0.3mg/day form days 14 to 28. Twelve women received intranasal estradiol, 300 microg/day from days 1 to 25 combined with 0.5 mg of promegestone from days 11 to 24. Eleven spontaneous cycling women had an endometrial biopsy during luteal phase and served as controls. Endometrial biopsies were processed routinely between days 18 and 24 and sections were immunostained using anti-CD34 antibody to identify vascular endothelial cells, which were treated with an automatic image analysis system. RESULTS: mean (+/-S.D.) vascular density for controls was 147+/-41.5 vessels/mm(2), with mean vessel area of 143+/-60.9 microm(2). In chlormadinone users endometrial microvascular density and mean vessel area did not differ from the control group (150.2+/-58.6 and 152.9+/-70.5). The other three progestins generated a significant increase of mean vessel density, 179.6+/-51.6 with micronised progesterone, 178.5+/-67.6 with norethisterone and 179.6+/-48.4 with promegestone. The mean vessel area was lower in the latter three groups, respectively, 108.4+/-39.0, 97.5+/-46.5 and 141.6+/-66.7 microm(2), promegestone leading to non significant difference with control. CONCLUSION: regarding vascularisation, chlormadinone and control group gave similar patterns. Promegestone was associated with an increase of the number of vessels, as did micronised progesterone or norethisterone; the mean vascular area was the smallest in the norethisterone group.     

GnRH antagonist-induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI-stimulated cycles. A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Our prospective randomized controlled trial was designed to assess whether the use of GnRH antagonists can improve the success rate of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS)/intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments, via inhibition of the premature LH rise. METHODS: A total of 104 patients were randomly divided, using a randomization list, into two groups: in group A (n = 52), recombinant FSH (rFSH) was given with GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix, and in group B (n = 52), the patients received rFSH alone in a manner similar to that of group A. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate per couple. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate per patient was 53.8% in group A and 30.8% in group B (P = 0.017). The rate of premature LH surge was 7% in group A and 35% in group B (P < 0.0001). A premature luteinization was observed in two cycles of 144 in group A (1.4%) and in 16 cycles of 154 in group B (10.4%) (P = 0.001). The mean values of LH and progesterone were significantly lower in patients receiving GnRH antagonist than in those who did not (3.3 +/- 3.3 mIU/ml in group A versus 9.9 +/- 7.9 mIU/ml in group B, P < 0.0001, for LH; 1.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml versus 2.1 +/- 1.9 ng/ml for group A and B, respectively, P < 0.0001, for progesterone). CONCLUSION: The use of GnRH antagonist in COS/IUI cycles improves pregnancy rate, preventing the premature LH rise and luteinization.     

Main inhibitor of follicle stimulating hormone in the luteal-follicular transition: inhibin A, oestradiol, or inhibin B?

The roles of oestradiol, inhibin A and inhibin B in the luteal-follicular transition were assessed by means of specific assays. Six premenopausal women were studied during a control and then a cycle treated with percutaneous oestradiol 0.1 mg/day from day 10 after the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge until day 4 of the following cycle. Inhibin A concentrations decreased similarly in control and treated cycles from day -5 to day 2, then increased in control cycle to 23.3 +/- 3.4 pg/ml on day 10 (mean +/- SEM). They remained low until day 5 in treated cycles and were lower than controls on day 10 (P < 0.01). Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations increased on day 1 in controls and on day 5 in treated cycles when oestradiol concentration fell abruptly. Inhibin B concentrations remained low until day 1 in controls and day 4 in treated cycles. In both, inhibin B concentrations increased 1 day after FSH, peaking at 160 pg/ml. FSH concentrations began to plateau when inhibin B concentrations were >100 pg/ml and oestradiol concentrations below 200 pmol/l. These data suggest that inhibin A is not responsible for FSH suppression in the luteal phase and that the negative control of FSH shifts from oestradiol in the luteal phase to inhibin B in the mid-follicular phase.     

Outcome of treatment subsequent to the elective cryopreservation of all embryos from women at risk of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

From 1st June 1989 to 31st May 1991, 78 women with a serum oestradiol level greater than 3500 pg/ml on the day of the ovulatory trigger, following pituitary suppression with buserelin and ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophins (HMG), had all their embryos electively cryopreserved at the pronucleate stage to minimize the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHS). Treatment with buserelin was continued in the luteal phase. A median of 19 oocytes (range 7-43) was obtained and 12 embryos (range 1-37) frozen per cycle. Twenty-one (27%) women developed OHS (six severe). Women developing OHS had higher (P less than 0.05) serum oestradiol concentrations on the 7th day after oocyte retrieval, compared to those who did not. No differences were found for any of the following criteria: aetiology of infertility, age, total dose of HMG, number of oocytes, fertilization rate or freeze-thaw survival of embryos. Subsequently, 125 frozen-thawed embryo replacements have been undertaken, using buserelin and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (n = 93) or natural cycles (n = 32). The overall freeze-thaw survival and implantation rates per embryo were 71.8 and 11.7%, respectively. The pregnancy rates in natural cycles (19%) and buserelin/HRT cycles (29%) were not significantly different.     

Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group

A multicentre, open-label, randomized study of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran((R))/Antagon((TM))) was performed in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH: Puregon((R))). The study was designed as a non-inferiority study using a long protocol of buserelin (intranasal) and rFSH as a reference treatment. A total of 730 subjects was randomized in a treatment ratio of 2:1 (ganirelix:buserelin) using an interactive voice response system which stratified for age, type of infertility and planned fertilization procedure [IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)]. The median duration of GnRH analogue treatment was 5 days in the ganirelix group and 26 days in the buserelin group, whereas the median total rFSH dose was 1500 IU and 1800 IU respectively. In addition, in the ganirelix group the mean duration of stimulation was 1 day shorter. During ganirelix treatment the incidence of LH rises (LH >/=10 IU/l) was 2.8% versus 1.3% during rFSH stimulation in the buserelin group. On the day of triggering ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm diameter was 10.7 and 11.8, and the median serum oestradiol concentrations were 1190 pg/ml and 1700 pg/ml in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 9.1 and 10.4 respectively, whereas the mean number of good quality embryos was 3.3 and 3.5 respectively. The fertilization rate was equal in both groups (62.1%), and the same mean number of embryos (2.2) was replaced. The mean implantation rates were 15.7% and 21.8%, and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 20.3% and 25.7% in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. Evaluation of all safety data indicated that the ganirelix regimen was safe and well tolerated. The overall incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 2.4% in the ganirelix group and 5.9% in the reference group. The results of this study support a safe, short and convenient treatment regimen of ganirelix, resulting in a good clinical outcome for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI.     

A prospective randomized study on oestradiol valerate supplementation in addition to intravaginal micronized progesterone in buserelin and HMG induced superovulation

A prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate theuse of adding oestradiol valerate 6 mg per os daily to intravaginalmicronized progesterone (600 mg daily) as luteal supplements.The study comprised 378 infertile women superovulated with agonadotrophin releasing-hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausalgonadotrophins (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or zygoteintra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). The clinical pregnancy ratewas similar (29%) whether or not oestradiol valerate was addedto intravaginal progesterone. Eighteen out of twenty-two endometrialbiopsies were in phase, and morphological evaluations of thetwo luteal supplementation groups were not different. Serumhormone profiles in singleton pregnancies showed a similar dayof appearance of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) in bothprotocols but significantly lower oestradiol concentrationsarose in the group without oestradiol valerate. In 32% of thesingleton pregnancies, the first appearance of HCG occurredlater than day 12 after HCG injection; in those ongoing pregnancies,corpus luteum rescue—as measured by significantly lowerserum oestradiol and progesterone concentrations—was compromised.This study provided no evidence of any benefit of routinelysupplementing GnRHa/HMG cycles with oestradiol valerate in additionto intravaginal micronized progesterone.