N-acetyltransferase (NAT1, NAT2) and glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1, GSTT1) polymorphisms in breast cancer

To evaluate the potential association between NAT1/NAT2 polymorphisms and breast cancer, a case-control study was conducted in Korean women (254 cases, 301 controls). NAT1 *4/*10 genotype (42%) was the most common NAT1 genotype in this Korean population. The frequencies of slow, intermediate and rapid NAT2 acetylator genotype were 16, 39 and 44% in cases and 16, 42 and 42% in controls. Neither NAT1 rapid (homozygous or heterozygous NAT1 *10) (OR=1.2, 95% CI=0.8-1.9) nor NAT2 rapid acetylator genotype (OR=1.2, 95% CI=0.8-1.7) showed significant association with breast cancer risk. Although the risk of NAT2 rapid acetylator genotype in postmenopausal women (OR=1.4, 95% CI=0.7-2.8) was higher than that in premenopausal women (OR=1.1, 95% CI=0.7-1.7), those were not statistically significant. However, combinations of NAT1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes showed a significant linear gene-dosage relationship with breast cancer (p for trend=0.04) and those women with NAT2 rapid acetylator and both GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were at the elevated risk (OR=3.1, 95% CI=1.0-9.1). These results suggest that genetic polymorphisms of NAT1 and NAT2 have no independent effect on breast cancer risk, but they modulate breast cancer risk in the presence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and T1 (GSTT1) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk among Northwestern Mediterraneans

Several polymorphic genes including those encoding for glutathione S- transferases (GST) have been reported to be involved in modifying lung cancer risk in smokers. The gene GSTM1 is frequently deleted in humans and a possible association between the null genotype and lung cancer risk is controversial. Another polymorphic gene of the same supergene family, GSTT1, is also involved in the detoxification of some environmental carcinogens. Both genes were genotyped in (a) a group of lung cancer patients (n = 160); (b) a group of healthy smokers (n = 120); (c) a group of blood donors from the general population (n = 192). All patients and controls were Northwestern Mediterranean Caucasians. The results show that the GSTM1 null genotype (GSTM1*0/GSTM1*0) was slightly over represented in the lung cancer patients (frequency of 58%; OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 0.74-2.61, referred to healthy smokers). The histological type most clearly modified was small cell carcinoma (frequency of 62.2%, OR: 1.91, CI: 0.78-4.69). The subdivision of the patients with one or two copies of the GSTM1 gene according to a GSTM1*A, GSTM1*B or GSTM1*A/B genotype (frequencies of 28.2%, 11.2%, 2.5% respectively) revealed no significant differences between the cases and both control groups. The frequency of the deleted GSTT1 genotype among the lung cancer patients (24%) was not significantly increased (OR: 1.08, CI: 0.57-2.05, referred to healthy smokers). The results showed that 14.4% of the patients presented homozygous deletion of both GSTT1 and GSTM1 (12.5% among healthy smokers) suggesting no potentiation between null genotypes for lung cancer risk.      

Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and T1 (GSTT1) in ovarian cancer risk

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are ubiquitous, multifunctional phase II metabolic enzymes responsible for the detoxification of estrogen involved in the development of ovarian cancer. Data from epidemiological studies show conflicting results that remain to be further clarified. We estimated in this study the genetic effects of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk. Eligible studies of the two polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk were identified from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. We summarized all data and performed a meta-analysis. Odds ratio (OR) and 95 % CI was calculated by using the fixed effects model to estimate the associations. Eight eligible studies were finally identified providing 2,397 cases and 2,910 controls for GSTM1 polymorphism and 2,049 cases and 2,668 controls for GSTT1 polymorphism. The overall data showed that carries of the GSTM1 null genotype did not have significantly increased ovarian cancer risk compared with those who carried the GSTM1 present genotype (null vs. present—OR, 1.01; 95 % CI, 0.91–1.11; heterogeneity, P?=?0.672). Similarly, for GSTT1 polymorphism, we observed no association under the investigated model in the overall analysis (null vs. present—OR, 1.02; 95 % CI, 0.89–1.17; heterogeneity, P?=?0.372), and in the subgroup of Caucasian subjects (null vs. present—OR, 0.99; 95 % CI, 0.86–1.14; heterogeneity, P?=?0.959). The meta-analysis does not provide a strong evidence for causal associations between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and risk of ovarian cancer in Caucasians.     

Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase genes (GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1) and breast cancer susceptibility

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) family of enzymes function in the body to detoxify carcinogenic compounds. Several genes that code for these enzymes are polymorphic, with particular genotypes previously shown to confer an increased cancer risk. In this study, we investigated the role of three GST genes (GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1) in the development of sporadic breast cancer. Genotypes were determined in 129 breast cancer affected and 129 age and sex matched control individuals. Results did not support an involvement of these specific GST gene polymorphisms, either independently or in combination, in susceptibility to sporadic breast cancer in the tested Australian Caucasian population.     

Meta-analysis of the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer

Aim: We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the influence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms on cervical cancer risk, and explore gene-environment interactions. Methods: Identification of relevant studies was carried out through a search of Medline and the EMbase up to Oct. 2011. All case-control studies that investigated the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and risk of cervical cancer were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was used for analyses of results and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results: A total of 21 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis of GSTM1 (2,378 cases and 2,639 controls) and GSTT1 (1,229 cases and 1,223 controls) genotypes. The overall results showed that the GSTM1 null was related to an increased risk of cervical cancer (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.21-1.85). Subgroup analysis were performed based on smoking and ethnicity. Our results showed that smokers with null GSTM1 genotype had a moderate increased risk of cervical cancer (OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.07-3.20). For the ethnicity stratification, moderate significantly increased risk of null GSTM1 genotype was found in Chinese (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.43-3.15) and Indian populations (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.49-2.88), but no increased risk was noted in others. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provided strong evidence that the GSTM1 genotype is associated with the development of cervical cancer, especially in smokers, and Chinese and Indian populations. However, no association was found for GSTT1 null genotype carriers.     

GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk

Previous studies have suggested that GST genotypes may play a role in determining susceptibility to lung cancer, though the data are often conflicting. In this study we investigated GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 status in relation to lung cancer risk in patients attending a Manchester bronchoscopy clinic. Cases were all patients (n=94) currently with, or with a history of, tumours of the lung, trachea or bronchus. The control group were all other patients (n=165) who were free of benign and malignant tumours both at the time of, or prior to, diagnosis. All patients were interviewed for information on lifestyle risk factors, and DNA extracted from bronchial lavage and blood samples was used for genotyping. GSTM1 null genotype was associated with decreased lung cancer risk (odds ratio (OR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29–0.87), particularly among men (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.87) and those above the median age (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15–0.70). No difference in GSTT1 and GSTP1 genotype distribution was seen between cases and controls. The GSTM1 null genotype was associated with a decreased risk of squamous cell carcinoma: the OR, adjusted for age, sex and pack years was 0.32 (95% CI 0.12–0.82). As previous studies have reported that the GSTM1 null genotype is associated with an increased lung cancer risk, further work is required to determine whether the observed association is true, or whether it arises from bias or confounding factors.     

Lack of association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and brain tumour risk

Objective: Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are important enzymes that are involved in detoxification ofenvironmental carcinogens. Molecular epidemiological studies have been conducted to investigate the associationbetween GSTM1 and GSTT1 homozygous deletion polymorphisms and brain tumours but results have beenconflicting. The aim of this study was to clarify this problem using a meta-analysis. Methods: A total of 9 recordswere identified by searching the PubMed and Embase databases. Fixed- and random-effects models wereperformed to estimate the pooled odds ratios. Results: No significant association was found between the GSTM1and GSTT1 homozygous deletion polymorphisms and risk of brain tumours, including glioma and meningioma.Similar negative results were also observed in both population-based and hospital-based studies. Conclusion:These findings indicate that the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms may not be related to the development ofbrain tumours.     

广西扶绥县肝癌高发家系谷胱甘肽转硫酶GSTM1和GSTT1基因多态性的研究

目的探讨广西扶绥县肝癌高发区壮族人群谷胱甘肽转硫酶GSTM1和GSTT1的基因多态性在肝癌家族聚集性中的作用,以及一级亲属与先证者之间HCC易感性的关系。方法采用病例一对照研究方法,收集21个广西扶绥县壮族肝癌家系76例,以及该地区21个对照家系68例,采用多重PCR技术和凝胶成像分析方法,对入选者GSTM1和GSTT1基因型进行检测,用ELISA法检测HBsAg,并将实验结果与临床资料相结合,进行统计学分析。结果（1）GSTM1基因空白型在肝癌家系组、对照家系组之间的频率分别为67．1％和36．8％（P=0．000）;GSTT1基因空白型在肝癌家系组、对照家系组之间的频率分别为40．8％和19．1％（P=-0．005）;GSTM1和GSTT1基因同时缺失在肝癌家系组、对照家系组的频率分别为31．6％和2．9％（P=0．000）。②将GSTM1及GSTT1基因同时表达型为基准计算两基因联合作用的危险度,GSTM1基因缺失GSTT1基因表达型、GSTM1基因表达GSTT1基因缺失型、GSTM1基因及GSTT1基因联合缺失型的OR值分别为0．102、0．210和3．092。（3）GSTM1基因空白型在先证者与其直系亲属之间的频率分别为71．4％和65．5％（P=0．620）,GSTT1基因空白型在先证者与其直系亲属之间的频率分别为47．6％和38．2％（P=0．454）。GSTM1和GSTT1基因同时缺失在先证者与其直系亲属之间的频率分别为33．3％和30．9％（P=-0．839）,差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论（1）GSTM1和GSTT1基因的多态性与肝癌家族聚集性相关;（2）GSTM1和GSTT1基因联合缺失与HCC的发生呈显著正相关,且两基因可能具有协同作用;③直系亲属与先证者HCC发生率无差别。     

Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) and susceptibility to gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

The association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and gastric cancer risk has been both confirmed and refuted in a number of published studies. Most of these studies were based on small sample sizes. We carried out a meta-analysis of the research published up to August 2005 to obtain more precise estimates of gastric cancer risk associated with GSTT1 polymorphism. In the present study, 16 case-control studies (with a total of 6717 subjects) were eligible for meta-analysis. There was no evidence of heterogeneity between the studies. The GSTT1 null genotype conferred a 1.06-fold increased risk of gastric cancer, which was not significant (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.19). However, in the analysis of ethnic groups, we observed distinct differences associated with GSTT1 status. Restricting analyses to ethnic groups, the pooled odd ratios for the GSTT1 genotype were 1.27 in Caucasians (95% CI: 1.03-1.57) and 0.98 in Asians (95% CI: 0.86-1.13). Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and GSTT1 are involved in detoxification of a variety of compounds, some that overlap between enzymes and some that are highly specific. To investigate whether the profile of glutathione S-transferase genotypes was associated with risk of gastric cancer, further analyses combining the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes were also carried out. There was a significant trend in risk associated with zero, one and two putative high-risk genotypes (chi2 = 9.326, d.f. = 1, P = 0.0023). Those who had null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 had an increased gastric cancer risk compared with those who had both active genes (odds ratio = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.42-3.10).     

Significant associations between GSTM1/GSTT1 polymorphisms and nasopharyngeal cancer risk

Glutathione S-transferases play a critical role in the detoxification and elimination of electrophilic carcinogens by conjugating them to glutathione. Homozygous deletions of GSTM1 and GSTT1 have been suggested as risk factors for some cancers, including colorectal, pancreatic, and esophageal cancers. Results of previous individual studies published to estimate the associations between GSTM1/GSTT1 polymorphisms and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) risk remained controversial. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis by pooling the odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) of all currently available case–control studies to shed some light on the contradictory finding. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases up to October 20, 2012 was performed to identify eligible studies. A total of 15 separate publications involving 2,226 NPC cases and 3,339 controls were finally included into this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of total studies showed that the null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 were both significantly associated with increased risk of NPC (for GSTM1: OR?=?1.54, 95 % CI 1.28–1.86, P _OR?<?0.001; for GSTT1: OR?=?2.25, 95 % CI 1.50–3.36, P _OR?<?0.001). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity suggested that carriers of both GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes in Asians were more susceptible to NPC. Additionally, in the subgroup analysis based on the sample size, significant associations of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms with NPC susceptibility were identified among studies both with larger case sample size (number of cases ≥100) and smaller case sample size (number of cases <100). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of our results. These results indicate that the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms may play crucial roles in the development of NPC, especially in Asians.     

GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and postmenopausal breast cancer risk

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of important enzymes involved in the detoxification of a wide variety of known and suspected carcinogens, including potential mammary carcinogens identified in charred meats and tobacco smoke. A substantial proportion of the Caucasian population has a homozygous deletion (null) of the GSTM1 or GSTT1 gene, which results in lack of production of these isoenzymes. We conducted a case-control study in a cohort of postmenopausal Iowa women who in 1986 completed a mailed questionnaire on lifestyle factors including information on cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk factors. DNA samples and information related to charred meat intake were obtained, in the case-control study, from breast cancer cases diagnosed during 1992–1994, and a random sample of cancer-free cohort members. Included in this study were 202 cases and 481 controls who were genotyped for GSTM1 or GSTT1 gene polymorphisms. Compared to women who had both GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes, a 60% elevated risk (95% CI = 1.0–2.5) was observed among those whose GSTM1 or GSTT1 gene was deleted. When stratified by meat eating habits, the risk of breast cancer associated with null GSTM1 or GSTT1 genotype was observed primarily among women who ate meats consistently well- or very well-done. Women who carried either one of the null genotypes and consumed meat consistently well- or very well-done had a 3.4-fold elevated risk of developing breast cancer (95% CI = 1.6–7.1). Cigarette smoking was not a risk factor for breast cancer among women who had either the GSTM1 or GSTT1 genes. Among those with the null GSTT1 genotype, however, a significantly elevated risk of breast cancer was associated with cigarette smoking (OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.1–5.4) and the association was stronger among former (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.5–12.8) than current smokers (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.4–4.1). This study suggests that certain null GST genotypes may be associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer and the association may be modified by charred meat intake and cigarette smoking.     

Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase genes GSTP1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia cancers

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzymes are known to metabolize tobacco-related carcinogens. Previous studies on the association of functional polymorphisms of GST genes with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma have yielded conflicting but overall null results. A few studies of esophageal adenocarcinoma were likewise conflicting, but the scarcity of data is striking. We aimed to study associations of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null deletion polymorphisms as well as the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism with risks for esophageal and gastric cardia cancers. DNA was prepared from 96 and 79 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, respectively, 126 cardia cancer cases, and 471 population-based controls. Pyrosequencing typed the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism, while multiplex PCR detected GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions. Logistic regression modeling estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). None of the studied polymorphisms were related to the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but the variant GSTP1 Val¹⁰⁵ allele was associated with an increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.0–2.9) and tended to be weakly, positively linked to cardia cancer (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 0.9–2.1). Finally, we performed a meta-analysis and found that GSTP1 polymorphism seems to be associated with the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma among Caucasian population (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.0–2.2; p value for heterogeneity test 0.34).     

IGlutathione S-transferase (GSTM1 and GSTT1) Polymorphisms in Cervical Cancer in Northeastern Thailand

To evaluate the relationships between genetic polymorphisms of the GSTs (GSTM1 and GSTT1) and cervicalcancer, the null genotype of each gene was studied in squamous cell cervical cancer (SCCA) patients (n=90) andcontrols (n=94) in Northeast Thailand. The prevalence of the GSTM1-null genotype in the controls and SCCApatients was 59.6% and 60.0%, respectively, whereas those of the GSTT1-null genotype in the control andSCCA patients was 40.4% and 46.7%, respectively. Neither of the GST-null genotypes increased the risk forSCCA (p>0.05); however, the combination of the GSTM-1 and GSTT1-null genotypes showed a non-significanttrend to an increased risk for developing cervical cancer with an adjusted OR of 2.7 (95%CI=0.8-9.0, p=0.10).Genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTT1 were not significant risk factors for cervical cancer in eithertobacco-smokers or non-smokers. A different contribution of the GST genotype to cancer risk may be attributedto a different, as yet undefined, property of the enzymes.     

Polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1 and GSTT1) and survival after treatment for breast cancer

The response to treatment for breast cancer is likely predicted by a number of disease and tumor tissue characteristics, many of which are under active investigation. One area that has received little attention is that of endogenous capabilities to respond to reactive oxygen species and subsequent byproducts resulting from radiation therapy and a number of chemotherapeutic agents, preventing cytotoxicity toward tumor cells. The glutathione S-transferases are key conjugating enzymes in this response, and GSTM1 and GSTT1 have deletion polymorphisms that result in no enzyme activity. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the role of GSTM1- and GSTT1-null genotypes on disease-free and overall survival among 251 women who received treatment for incident, primary breast cancer. Women were identified through Tumor Registry records and normal archived tissue retrieved for genotyping. Adjusting for age, race, and stage at diagnosis, women with null genotypes for GSTM1 and GSTT1 had reduced hazard of death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-0.97; and HR, 0.51; CI, 0.29-0.90, respectively] in relation to those with alleles present. Furthermore, women who were null for both GSTM1 and GSTT1 had one-third the hazard of death of those with alleles for both genes present (adjusted HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70). Similar relationships were noted for risk of recurrence. These data indicate that interindividual differences in activity of enzymes that prevent therapy-generated reactive oxidant damage may have an important impact on disease recurrence and overall survival.     

Associations of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms with pancreatic cancer risk

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), including glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1), are multifunctional enzymes which play vital roles in the detoxification of a variety of carcinogens. The genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTT1 have been implicated in pancreatic cancer risk, but the results of published studies remain conflicting. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on the risk of developing pancreatic cancer. A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases to identify the available studies on the associations of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms with pancreatic cancer risk. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to estimate the associations. Stratified analyses by ethnicity and sensitivity analyses were performed to further identify the relationships. Overall, the null genotype of GSTT1 was associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (OR?=?1.61, 95 % CI 1.06–2.44, P _OR?=?0.025), but similar association was not found between the null genotype of GSTM1 and pancreatic cancer risk. Besides, a significant association of GSTT1 polymorphism with pancreatic cancer risk was identified in Asians (OR?=?2.58, 95 % CI 1.67–3.98, P _OR?<?0.001), but not in Caucasians (OR?=?1.16, 95 % CI 0.94–1.43, P _OR?=?0.170). Sensitivity analyses by sequential omission of individual study confirmed the stability of our results. Meta-analysis of available data thus far shows that the null genotype of GSTT1 is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, particularly in the Asian population. The currently available data are not sufficient enough to identify the association between the GSTM1 polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk.     

The role of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in head and neck cancer risk

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a serious health problem worldwide and tobacco smoke is a main causative factor for this malignancy. Interindividual genetic differences in enzymes involved in the metabolism of tobacco smoke carcinogens are one of the most important risk factors in the development of HNC. GSTM1 and GSTT1 enzymes participate in detoxifying of tobacco smoke carcinogens and have deletion polymorphisms. We performed a case control study to investigate a possible association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 variants and HNC risk. A total of 98 HNC cases, all of which were squamous cell carcinoma, and 120 healthy controls were investigated. GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms were genotyped using PCR. There was a significant association between HNC and GSTM1-null genotype (adjusted OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.303-4.26, p = 0.005). The frequency overall of GSTT1-null genotypes was not significant in HNC patients compared with that of GSTT1-positive genotypes (adjusted OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.563-2.397, p = 0.686). No combined effect was observed for GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes. When data were stratified by smoking status, cases having GSTM1-null genotype who were smokers conferred the highest risk (adjusted OR: 4.06, 95% CI: 1.3-12.63). Thus, our results suggest that GSTM1 polymorphism may significantly increase the risk of HNC and there is an additive interaction between GSTM1-null genotype and smoking on HNC risk.     

Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes and lung cancer risk

Genetic polymorphisms of the genes encoding for the xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes result in individual variations in the efficiency of detoxification of environmental carcinogens, and have been extensively associated with variable risk for lung neoplasms in different ethnic and environmental backgrounds. In this study, using PCR-RFLP based assays, we investigated the distribution of genetic polymorphisms in CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes in Greek lung cancer patients (N=122) and healthy controls (N=178). The frequency of CYP1A1 m1 homozygous genotype was 0.04 in patients and 0.02 in controls (detected in 4.10% of patients and in 1.69% of controls, respectively), that of GSTM1 null genotype was 0.52 in patients and 0.54 in controls, whereas those of GSTT1 null genotype was 0.17 and 0.11, in patients and controls, respectively. The GSTM1 null genotype was more frequent in adenocarcinoma, as well as in lung cancer patients with history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The GSTT1 null genotype correlated with advanced age of the patients at the time of diagnosis. Three combinations of rare genotypes - in subjects carrying simultaneously deviations from the common genotype in more than one gene - were over-represented in lung cancer patients, compared to control population, and were furthermore significantly associated with history of heavy tobacco consumption in lung cancer patients. The results imply involvement of specific genotype combinations of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 alleles in the development of lung cancer in heavy smokers.     

Allelism at the glutathione S-transferase GSTM3 locus: interactions with GSTM1 and GSTT1 as risk factors for astrocytoma

We describe studies to assess the influence of polymorphismin the human glutathione S-transferase GSTM3 gene on susceptibilityto high grade astrocytoma. Immunohisto-chemical studies usinga GSTM3-specific antiserum identified expression of the GSTM3subunit in astrocytes. The relative levels of expression ofGSTM1 and GSTM3 in brain cytosols were determined after resolutionof these enzymes using chromatofocusing. We found no differencesin the level of GSTM3 activity in individuals with GSTM1 nulland those with GSTMl-positive genotypes (GSTM1 A, GSTM1 B andGSTM1 A/B). A case-control study was performed to determineif GSTM3 alone or in combination with GSTM1 or GSTT1 influencedsusceptibility to high grade astrocytoma. After correction fordifferences in age and gender, GSTM3 AA was not significantlydifferent in cases compared with controls. No significant interactionsbetween GSTM3 AA and GSTM1 null were identified. The significantinteraction between GSTM3 AA and GSTT1 null appeared to resultfrom the strength of the main effect (GSTT1 null). The datashow that while GSTM3 is expressed in astrocytes and contributessignificantly to total GST activity in human brain, it doesnot appear to influence susceptibility to high grade astrocytoma.Further, unlike lung, there appears to be no relationship betweenthe level of GSTM3 activity in brain and GSTM1 genotype.     

Association between glutathione S-transferase p1 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in Caucasians: a case-control study

Glutathione transferases (GSTs), a multiple gene family of phase II enzymes, catalyze detoxifying endogenous reactions with glutathione and protect cellular macromolecules from damage caused by cytotoxic and carcinogenic agents. Glutathione S-transferase p1 (GSTP1), the most abundant GST isoform in the lung, metabolizes numerous carcinogenic compounds including benzo[a]pyrene, a tobacco carcinogen. Previous studies suggest that genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1 exon 5 (Ile105Val) and exon 6 (Ala114Val) have functional effects on the GST gene product resulting in reduced enzyme activity. Individuals with reduced GST enzymatic activity may be at a greater risk for cancer due to decreased detoxification of carcinogenic and mutagenic compounds. Utilizing a hospital-based case-control study, we investigated the association between GSTP1 polymorphisms at exons 5 and 6 with lung cancer risk. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was used to successfully genotype the GSTP1 exons 5 and 6 polymorphism in 582 Caucasian lung cancer cases and 600 frequency matched Caucasian controls. There was no association between the exon 5 variant genotypes (A/G+G/G) and overall lung cancer risk (OR=1.09; 95% CI 0.82-1.45) nor when stratified by age, gender, and smoking status. However, the exon 6 variant genotypes (C/T+T/T) were associated with a statistically significant elevated lung cancer risk (OR=1.40; 95% CI 1.06-1.92). Additionally, there was an increase in lung cancer risk for the exon 6 variant genotypes in younger individuals (<62 years) (OR=1.63; 95% C.I. 1.07-2.49) but no effect in older individuals (OR=1.14; 95% CI 0.72-1.81). A statistically significant increased risk of lung cancer was also observed for the exon 6 variant genotypes among men (OR=2.17; 95% CI 1.41-3.33), but not among women (OR=0.80; 95% CI 0.51-1.28). Among ever smokers, the exon 6 variant genotypes were associated with an elevated lung cancer risk (OR=1.58; 95% CI 1.14-2.19), which was not evident for never smokers (OR=0.53; 95% CI 0.21-1.33). These data demonstrate that the GSTP1 exon 6 polymorphism, but not the exon 5 polymorphism, is associated with lung cancer risk that is especially evident in men, younger individuals, and ever smokers.     

Polymorphisms at the glutathione S-transferase GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 loci: risk of ovarian cancer by histological subtype

The phase II glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 catalyse glutathione-mediated reduction of exogenous and endogenous electrophiles. These GSTs have broad and overlapping substrate specificities and it has been hypothesized that allelic variants associated with less effective detoxification of potential carcinogens may confer an increased susceptibility to cancer. To assess the role of GST gene variants in ovarian cancer development, we screened 285 epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 299 unaffected controls for the GSTT1 deletion (null) variant, the GSTM1 deletion (null) variant and the GSTP1 codon 104 A-->G Ile-->Val amino acid substitution variant. The frequencies of the GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphic variants did not vary with tumour behaviour (low malignant potential or invasive) or p53 immunohistochemical status. There was a suggestion that ovarian cancers of the endometrioid or clear cell histological subtype had a higher frequency of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletion genotype than other histological subgroups. The GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genotype distributions did not differ significantly between unaffected controls and ovarian cancer cases (overall or invasive cancers only). However, the GSTM1 null genotype was associated with increased risk of endometrioid/clear cell invasive cancer [age-adjusted OR (95% CI) = 2.04 (1.01-4.09), P = 0.05], suggesting that deletion of GSTM1 may increase the risk of ovarian cancer of these histological subtypes specifically. This marginally significant finding will require verification by independent studies.