Predictors, Treatment, and Outcomes of Gastrojejunostomy Stricture after Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

Background The aims of this study were to determine the rate of gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), the independent predictors of stricture, and clinical outcomes with and without a stricture. Methods Univariate and multivariate analysis of peri-operative and outcomes data were prospectively collected from 379 morbidly obese patients who underwent consecutive open or laparoscopic RYGBP from January 2003 to August 2006. Predictors studied were age, gender, BMI, co-morbidities, surgical technique (hand-sewn vs linear stapler vs 21-mm vs 25-mm circular stapler; open vs laparoscopic; retrocolic retrogastric vs antecolic antegastric Roux limb course, and Roux limb length), and surgeon experience. Outcomes studied consisted of occurrence of GJ strictures, technical details and outcomes after endoscopic therapy, and excess weight loss (EWL) at 12 months. Results 15 patients (4.1%) developed a GJ stricture. The use of a 21-mm circular stapler was identified as the only independent predictor of a GJ stricture (odds ratio 11.3; 95% CI 2.2-57.4, P = 0.004). Endoscopic dilation relieved stricture symptoms in all patients (60% one dilation only). There was no significant difference in %EWL at 12 months between the patients with a stricture (median EWL 54%, IQR 49 – 63) vs those without a stricture (median EWL 61%, IQR 49-73, P = 0.33). Conclusion The rate of GJ strictures is 4.1%. The use of a 21-mm circular stapler is the only independent predictor of GJ stricture. Endoscopic dilation relieved symptoms in all patients.Weight loss is independent of the anastomotic technique used and occurrence of a GJ stricture.     

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity with Linear Gastroenterostomy

Background: Laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) is a well-established procedure for the surgical management of morbid obesity. Most surgeons create the gastroenteral anastomosis by using the circular EEA stapler. We describe an alternative laparoscopic anastomotic technique using the EndoGIA linear stapling device. Methods: The stomach was proximally transected with a linear stapler (45 mm, Endo-GIA) to create a 15 to 20 ml pouch. Next, an antecolic Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy was performed, using the 45 mm Endo-GIA. The proximal loop of the intestine was then separated from the anastomotic site by the Endo-GIA. Finally, the Endo-GIA was used for the intraabdominal creation of a side-to-side enteroenterostomy. Results: Between June and August 2001, 5 patients with mean BMI 56.7 kg/m²±7.3 underwent LGBP. All patients were seen 6 months post-surgery. Operating time was 7.5 and 6.5 hours for the first 2 operations, but was under 4.5 h for the next 3 cases. 1 patient suffered from perioperative hypoxia leading to long-term artificial respiration. 6 weeks after surgery, 1 patient developed obstruction due to torsion of the enteroenterostomy and required open revision. The 3 remaining patients made an uneventful recovery. All patients lost considerable weight (mean 36.5 kg; [range 32 to 45] after 6 months). No stenosis or anastomotic leakage was noted. Conclusions: A linear stapled anastomosis is an alternative to the use of the circular stapler.     

Laparoscopic Conversion of Laparoscopic Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Review of 70 Patients

Background: The feasibility and outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) was evaluated. Methods: From November 2000 to March 2004, all patients who underwent laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to LRYGBP were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure included adhesiolysis, resection of the previous band, creation of an isolated gastric pouch, 100-cm Roux-limb, side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy, and end-to-end gastro-jejunostomy. Results: 70 patients (58 female, mean age 41) with a median BMI of 45±11 (27-81) underwent attempted laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to an RYGBP. Indications for conversion were insufficient weight loss or weight regain after band deflation for gastric pouch dilatation in 34 patients (49%), inadequate weight loss in 17 patients (25%), symptomatic proximal gastric pouch dilatation in 15 patients (20%), intragastric band migration in 3 patients (5%), and psychological band intolerance in 1 patient. 3 of 70 patients (4.3%) had to be converted to a laparotomy because of severe adhesions. Mean operative time was 240±40 SD min (210-280). Mean hospital length of stay was 7.2 days. Early complication rate was 14.3% (10/70). Late major complications occurred in 6 patients (8.6%). There was no mortality. Median excess body weight loss was 70±20%. 60% of patients achieved a BMI of <33 with mean follow-up 18 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to RYGBP is a technically challenging procedure that can be safely integrated into a bariatric treatment program with good results. Short-term weight loss is very good.     

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Linear Staplers during Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: The development of laparoscopic linear staplers has enabled minimally invasive approaches to bariatric surgery, but there have been no comparison studies of the two current 6-row devices. We report our experience with a prospective randomized comparison of 6-row linear staplers during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Methods: From January to March 2003, 100 patients were randomly assigned to undergo LRYGBP with either an Endo-GIA Universal 6-row stapler (USSC) or the ETS-Flex 6-row stapler (Ethicon). Mean preoperative BMI was 49±8 for 50 Endo-GIA patients, and 49±7 for 50 ETS-Flex patients. Parameters measured included quantity of cartridges, handles, hemoclips, estimated blood loss, misfires, OR time, postoperative leaks and bleeds, and cost. Results: Mean follow-up was 135 days (range 90- 180). The ETS-Flex group experienced significantly more misfires (28% vs 2%, P <.001), hemoclips applied (30±9 vs 21±7, P <.001), estimated blood loss (132±56 vs 100±32 ml, P <.001) and OR time (66±19 vs 58±13 mins, P <.02) compared with the Endo-GIA group respectively.There was one postoperative leak associated with the ETS-Flex group and two postoperative bleeds with the Endo-GIA group, which were not a significant differences.The Endo-GIA group averaged $319 more per case for staple cost. Conclusion: While the ETS-Flex stapler was less expensive, it was associated with more technical failures requiring surgeon intervention to reduce potential patient morbidity, compared with the Endo-GIA.     

Gastrojejunal Strictures after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With a 21-MM Circular Stapler

Introduction:

Intraluminal staplers for gastrojejunostomy construction during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) may be associated with postoperative strictures. We analyzed outcomes of a transabdominal circular-stapled RYGBP with evaluation of short- and long-term anastomotic complications.

Methods:

All laparoscopic RYGBPs performed between January 2004 and December 2005 at an academic institution were reviewed. The gastrojejunostomy was created by using the transabdominal passage of a 21-mm intraluminal circular stapler into an antecolic, antegastric Roux limb. This retrospective chart review analyzes patient demographics, anastomotic complications, and weight loss.

Results:

Between January 2004 and December 2005, 159 patients underwent transabdominal circular-stapled RYGBP. Fifteen patients developed a stenosis at the gastrojejunostomy, all requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation. One of these patients required laparoscopic revision of the gastrojejunostomy. Eleven strictures occurred after 30 days, whereas only 4 strictures occurred within 30 days of surgery. Two marginal ulcerations were seen within 1 year of surgery.

Conclusion:

Our 9.4% stricture rate parallels what has been reported in the literature. The majority of strictures were amenable to one endoscopic treatment session. Transabdominal circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy is a reproducible construct for use in bariatric surgery.     

Gastric bypass: why Roux-en-Y? A review of experimental data

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the clinical and experimental rationales that support why the Roux-en-Y limb is an important surgical principle for bariatric gastric bypass. DATA SOURCES: We reviewed PubMed citations for open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), laparoscopic RYGBP, loop gastric bypass, chronic alkaline reflux gastritis, and duodenoesophageal reflux. STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed clinical and experimental articles. Clinical articles included prospective, retrospective, and case series of patients undergoing RYGBP, laparoscopic RYGBP, or loop gastric bypass. Experimental articles that were reviewed included in vivo and in vitro models of chronic duodenoesophageal reflux and its effect on carcinogenesis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: No formal data extraction was performed. We reviewed published operative times, lengths of stay, and anastomotic leak rates for laparoscopic RYGBP and loop gastric bypass. For in vivo and in vitro experimental models of duodenoesophageal reflux, we reviewed the kinetics and potential molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Recent data suggest that laparoscopic loop gastric bypass, performed without the creation of a Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy, is a faster surgical technique that confers similarly robust weight loss compared with RYGBP or laparoscopic RYGBP. In the absence of a Roux limb, the long-term effects of chronic alkaline reflux are unknown. Animal models and in vitro analyses of chronic alkaline reflux suggest a carcinogenic effect.     

The impact of circular stapler diameter on the incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis and weight loss following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Background Gastrojejunostomy stenosis after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a common occurrence. The incidence varies widely among reported series. We evaluated the impact of circular stapler size on the rate of stenosis and weight loss. Methods Our initial technique utilized a 21-mm circular stapler to construct the gastrojejunostomy. We switched to a 25-mm stapler after a large preliminary experience. Stenosis was confirmed by endoscopy in patients complaining of the inability to eat or excessive vomiting, and was defined as a gastrojejunostomy diameter less than that of a therapeutic endoscope (11-mm). Results Stenosis occurred in 23 of 145 patients (15.9%) with a 21-mm gastrojejunostomy. Five of 81 patients with a 25-mm circular stapled anastomosis have developed a stenosis (6.2%, p = 0.03). Weight loss was similar for each sized stapler at 6 and 12 months. Conclusions The use of a 25-mm circular stapler in laparoscopic gastric bypass is preferable to a 21-mm stapler. The larger stapler is associated with a significantly decreased incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis without compromising early weight loss.     

Experience with the Circular Stapler for the Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (350 Cases)

Background: The increased incidence of morbid obesity has resulted in an increase in bariatric surgery. The gastrojejunostomy performed during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) operations has technical variability with different outcomes and complication-rates immediate postoperatively and at long-term follow-up. Methods: Between Jan 2000 and Feb 2005, 350 laparoscopic RYGBP procedures were performed. We present our immediate and follow-up rate of complications with total intraabdominal gastrojejunostomy, performed with the circular stapler. Results: Complications of gastrojejunostomy were detected in 24 patients (6.8%): 3 anastomotic leaks (0.8%); 6 bleeding (1.7%) immediately postoperatively, and 4 stenoses (1.1%), 10 ulcers (2.8%) and 1 stenosis plus ulcer (0.3%) during long-term follow-up. There was no mortality related to the gastrojejunostomy. Conclusions: The gastrojejunostomy with circular stapler is an easily reproducible procedure. The rate of complications has been low. Surgeons who perform laparoscopic RYGBP should have a careful learning curve, and should be aware of the potential complications and their management.     

Comparison between Open Hand-sewn,Laparoscopic Stapled and Laparoscopic Computer-mediated,Circular Stapled Gastro-Jejunostomies in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Porcine Model

Background: In this porcine survival model, we compared laparoscopic computer-mediated flexible circular stapled (SurgASSIST) gastro-jejunostomies in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) to open hand-sewn (HS) and laparoscopic end-to-end (EEA) anastomosis. Methods: RYGBP was performed in 15 pigs. Depending on the technique used to create the gastro-jejunostomy, the pigs were divided in 3 groups. In group A, a standard two-layer hand-sewn anastomosis were performed. In group B and C, gastro-jejunostomies using EEA (B) or SurgASSIST (C) were attempted. Operation time, intraoperative technical failure, postoperative anastomotic leakage, and necropsy results were measured. Results: 14 pigs survived surgery. One leakage from the gastro-jejunostomy was detected intraoperatively in group B. There was no evidence of leakage postoperatively from the proximal gastro-jejunostomy in any groups. No statistical difference was found between the groups concerning the operation time or the diameter and degree of healing of the anastomosis. Conclusion: We found the SurgASSIST system safe for performing gastro-jejunostomies in laparoscopic RYGBP. There were no anastomotic failures intra- or postoperatively. At necropsy, there was no evidence of anastomotic stricture or delayed healing processes.     

Shorter circular staple is height associated with lower anastomotic stricture rate in laparoscopic gastric bypass

BackgroundAnastomotic stenosis, leak, and hemorrhage are common stapler-related complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In May 2007, we transitioned from a 25-mm diameter, 4.8-mm-height circular stapler to a 25-mm, 3.5-mm-height circular stapler. We hypothesized that the staple height would be associated with a decreased incidence of perioperative complications.MethodsThe records of 360 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from May 1, 2006 to March 31, 2008 were retrospectively abstracted. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project and Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative databases were used to collect the patient demographics and track complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Data were collected on the rates of anastomotic stenosis requiring dilation of the gastrojejunostomy, anastomotic leak, hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and wound infection. Patients with a 4.8-mm staple height gastrojejunostomy were compared with those with a 3.5-mm staple height gastrojejunostomy for differences in complications.ResultsThe groups were similar with respect to age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, sleep apnea, and surgery duration. In the 4.8- and 3.5-mm staple height groups, 15% and 6.1% required gastrojejunal dilation, respectively (P = .01). A trend was seen toward a decrease in postoperative hemorrhage (5% versus 2.8%) with the shorter staple height. No anastomotic leaks occurred, and the incidence of wound infection (1.7% versus 2.2%) was similar between the 2 groups.ConclusionIn the present study, the use of a 25-mm, 3.5-mm staple height circular stapler was associated with a decreased rate of anastomotic stenosis.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with linear cutter technique: comparison of four-row versus six-row cartridge in creation of anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity is refractory to medical treatment. The introduction of laparoscopic linear staplers in the early 1990s contributed to the development of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass technique. Many series have compared different brands of circular and linear staplers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 4-row versus 6-row endoscopic staplers in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for creation of the anastomosis. METHODS: Between July 2000 and April 2004, 1240 patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The 4-row linear stapler was used in the first 664 cases (group 1) and the 6-row stapler in the latter 576 patients (group 2) to create the anastomosis. The medical records of those patients who developed leaks, gastrogastric fistulas, strictures, or bleeding were reviewed. Strictures were diagnosed using radiologic or endoscopic techniques. RESULTS: Leaks were more frequent in group 2 than in group 1 (1.56% versus 1.05%, respectively, P = .46). Documented bleeding occurred in 15 and 13 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (2.26% for both). Strictures were diagnosed in 7.68% of patients in group 1 (51 gastrojejunostomy and 4 jejunojejunostomy), and in 4.3% of those in group 2 (25 gastrojejunostomy stenosis, P = .017). Gastrogastric fistulas were found in 5 patients (.75%) in group 1 and 6 (1.04%) in group 2. CONCLUSION: Using a 6-row instead of a 4-row linear cutter technique to create the anastomosis yielded similar results, but the stricture rate at the gastrojejunal anastomosis was significantly lower with the newer, 6-row staplers.     

Treatment of Gastro-Jejunal Leakage and Fistulization after Gastric Bypass with Coated Self-Expanding Stents

Leakage and fistulization of the gastro-jejunostomy have been the major drawback of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) surgery. Most authors agree that operative treatment is the mainstay of therapy in patients with signs of sepsis. However, intestinal contents causing localized infection may impede healing of sutured leaks in some patients, and fistulas develop. Because the anastomosis cannot be disconnected or exteriorized for anatomical reasons, other forms of treatment have to be applied. The following case-reports describe a technique with implantation of coated self-expanding stents. Leakage of the gastro-jejunostomy occurred in one patient 3 days after RYGBP and resulted in formation of a fistula. A fistula developed in a second patient 63 days after RYGBP. Coated self-extending stents were implanted endoscopically in both patients on postoperative days 19 and 67. Enteral nutrition could be started 6 days later. Stents were removed 2 months after implantation without problems. Weight loss and quality of life 7 and 21 months after stent removal have been excellent in both patients. Implantation of coated self-expanding stents was an effective and minimally invasive option for gastro-jejunal anastomotic fistulas after RYGBP where surgical repair was not possible. In these cases, application of stents allows septic source control without any other intervention.     

A Functional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Avoid Gastric Exclusion: 1-Year Results

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is rarely performed in Italy because it involves gastric exclusion. RYGBP with the stomach partitioned by an adjustable gastric band has been previously described. We have developed a functional RYGBP (FRYGBP) where an adjustable band allows access from a stapled gastric bypass pouch into the distal stomach. Methods: From October 2001 to May 2002, 16 patients underwent FRYGBP. A 30-cc vertical gastric pouch was fashioned by a 25-mm circular and 90-mm four-row stapler as in the Mason VBG. A hand-sewn retrocolic gastroenterostomy with 150-cm Roux and 30-cm afferent limbs completed the operation. The pouch outlet was encircled distal to the gastrojejunostomy by a non-inflated adjustable gastric band. The bands were inflated at 1 month during barium swallow, to demonstrate occlusion of the gastro-gastric outlet and patency of the gastrojejunostomy. Results: There was no operative mortality. After 1 year, mean percent excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) was 71.2 ± 16.2% (SD), and gastroscopy of the bypassed stomach was possible on 81% of the patients. There were three asymptomatic late complications (19%): two band erosions, converted to RYGBP, and one stenosis of the gastro-gastric outlet. Conclusion: FRYGBP thus far has been effective and allows the study of the excluded stomach. This ongoing study will undergo long-term evaluation.     

Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Hand-Sewn Gastrojejunal Anastomosis

Single-port laparoscopic surgery has undergone significant development over the past 5 years. Single port is used in various procedures, including bariatric surgery. The aim of this paper is to describe a surgical technique for gastric bypass with a transumbilical approach (transumbilical gastric bypass—TUGB) with hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy, in selected patients who may be benefited by a better cosmetic result. The procedure begins with a transumbilical vertical incision. We use the GelPOINT single-port device and a 5-mm assistant trocar in the left flank (in the first two cases, a 2-mm subxiphoid liver retractor was used). A gastric pouch is made and calibrated with a 36-Fr bougie. The gastrojejunal anastomosis is performed by hand-sewing in two layers. A Roux-en-Y with a biliary limb of 50 cm and an alimentary limb of 120 cm is performed with a stapler. Three women were subjected to TUGB. The women were aged 28, 31, and 42 years; they had body mass indexes of 40.3, 33, and 38.2; and the operating times were 150, 200, and 150 min, respectively. The first two women underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and the last woman underwent a RYGB with a resection of the stomach remnant. There were no conversions to open or multitrocar techniques. No complications or deaths occurred. The three patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. The technique described for TUGB is a feasible procedure for surgeons who have previous experience with the transumbilical approach.     

Incidence of gastroenterostomy stenosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using 21- or 25-mm circular stapler: a randomized prospective blinded study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure performed in the United States today. The most common early complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y is stenosis. No randomized studies have compared the effect of the different staplers on the incidence of stenosis or on long-term weight loss. We compared the anastomoses performed with the two sizes of circular stapler in common use. METHODS: A total of 200 patients were randomized to undergo 21-mm (n = 100) or 25-mm (n = 100) circular stapled gastroenterostomy after induction of anesthesia. No other differences were allowed in the operative technique. Stenosis was defined as patient complaints of dysphagia leading to endoscopy within 10 weeks of surgery, in which a 9-mm diameter endoscope would not pass through the gastroenterostomy without dilation. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients, 19 patients in the 21-mm group and 8 in the 25-mm group underwent endoscopy for symptoms (P = 0.027). Of the 19 and 8 patients, 17 and 7, respectively, had measurable stenosis at endoscopy (p = 0.035). Patients with a 21-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 4.8 +/- 1.2 weeks after surgery, and those with a 25-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 8.9 +/- 3.8 weeks postoperatively (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant difference in the stenosis rate between the 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled anastomoses in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The 21-mm staplers led to significantly more endoscopies than did the 25-mm staplers. Symptoms leading to endoscopy occurred significantly later with use of a 25-mm stapler than after a 21-mm stapler.     

The Proximal Gastric Pouch Invariably Contains Acid-Producing Parietal Cells in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is well tolerated and effective in ameliorating diseases common to morbidly obese patients. A potential drawback, however, is the risk for stomal ulcers, probably due to acid and peptic digestion of the mucosa in the proximal Roux limb. Methods: In 23 RYGBP patients (mean BMI 45 kg/m², age 39 years), the gastro-jejunostomy was performed by circular stapler and the gastric suture ring retrieved for histological examination. 13 consecutive patients received our standard totally transected 4 × 3 cm proximal gastric pouch. The anvil was passed transgastricly and reference biopsies were taken from the gastrotomy in the corpus of the stomach. In the last 10 patients, the pouch size was reduced to 2 × 3 cm by a modified surgical technique. Results: All suture rings from the standard pouches consisted of corpus-fundus mucosa with a large amount of parietal cells, histologically identical to the reference biopsies from the gastrotomy. Also, the 10 suture rings from the modified small pouches contained corpus-fundus mucosa. In 5 of these samples, cardiac mucosa was found, but only in a small segment (6 mm). In addition, 3 patients had esophageal epithelium in the suture ring. Conclusion: The proximal pouch invariably contains acid-producing parietal cells. In order to reduce acid production and, hence, the risk of stomal ulcers, the pouch has to be made as small as possible.     

Gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: analysis of 1291 patients

BACKGROUND: The development of an anastomotic stricture at the site of the gastrojejunostomy following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is associated with substantial morbidity. Various techniques are available for creating the gastrojejunal anastomosis, including hand-sewing and using a circular or linear stapler, to reduce complication rates. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures in patients who underwent antecolic antegastric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (AA-RYGBP) with the use of a linear stapler and to evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic pneumatic dilatation as a treatment option for patients with anastomotic stricture. METHODS: All patients who met the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for bariatric surgery and underwent AA-RYGBP using a linear stapler technique between July 2000 and November 2004 were included in the study. Following Institutional Review Board approval, the medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Two surgeons performed all of the surgical procedures in this series using a standardized surgical protocol. RESULTS: Between July 2000 and November 2004, 1291 patients (1016 females [79%] and 275 male [11%]) underwent AA-RYGBP. The patients' mean age was 43 years (range, 19-75 years), and mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 49.6 kg/m2 (range, 34-97.5 kg/m2). Out of 1291 procedures, 1265 were performed laparoscopically (98.3%), with the reminder performed by laparotomy. A linear stapler was used to create the gastrojejunal anastomosis in all of the procedures. A total of 405 (31%) complications occurred, with gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures the most common complication, found in 94 (7.3%) patients more than 30 days after the procedure. All of these cases of stricture were treated by endoscopic pneumatic dilatation with a through the scope (TTS) balloon, requiring between one and four dilatory sessions. Of the 94 patients (2.1%) who underwent balloon dilatation, 2 developed perforation, only 1 of whom required surgical intervention. The mean postoperative hospital stay for the 94 patients was 4.2 days (range, 2-24 days); there was no perioperative patient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that AA-RYGBP can attain a relatively low complication rate and no mortality. Gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures were the most common complication and were diagnosed 30 days after the procedure. Endoscopic balloon dilatation can be offered as a first-line treatment for gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures. Perforation is a potential complication of this treatment and may necessitate surgical intervention.     

不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的安全性及卫生经济学对比

目的:比较直线切割吻合器与圆形吻合器在腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y吻合中的安全性与卫生经济学的差异。方法:回顾分析2017年8月至2019年2月192例接受腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术并Roux-en-Y式吻合患者的临床资料。根据胃肠吻合所用吻合器材类型,将患者分为直线切割吻合器组(A组,n=40,20.8%)与圆形吻合器组(B组,n=152,79.2%)。比较两组手术安全性、术后消化道功能恢复及卫生经济学的差异。结果:A组术中出血量[(59.75±38.397)mL vs.(63.29±67.792)mL,(P=0.752)]、手术时间[(249.28±65.72)min vs.(255.03±62.67)min,P=0.609]、淋巴结清扫数量[(30.68±11.74)枚vs.(32.43±12.61)枚,P=0.429]、Ⅱ度及以上并发症发生率[7.5%(3/40)vs.7.9%(12/152),P=0.934]、手术耗材费用(中位数:30758元vs.32749元,P=0.064)及住院费用(中位数:70759元vs.70851元,P=0.527)与B组差异无统计学意义。A组术后首次排气时间[(3.46±0.767)d vs.(3.98±1.190)d,P=0.013]、首次进流食时间[(4.32±1.029)d vs.(4.91±0.996)d,P=0.020]、拔除腹腔引流管时间[(6.00±0.882)d vs.(6.56±1.764)d,P=0.008]均短于B组,差异均有统计学意义。结论:腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y吻合中使用直线切割吻合器或圆形吻合器行消化道重建均是安全、可行的,使用直线切割吻合器术后首次排气时间、首次进流食时间更短,在术后胃肠道功能恢复方面存在优势。     

Late Perforation of the Jejuno-Jejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most commonly performed operation for the treatment of morbid obesity in the USA. Complications related to the jejuno-jejunal (J-J) anastomosis include postoperative leak, staple-line bleeding and obstruction. We present 3 cases of perforation at the J-J anastomosis occurring more than 30 days after surgery. 3 morbidly obese patients underwent laparoscopic RYGBP. The side-to-side J-J anastomosis was created with a linear stapler, and the anastomotic defect was closed with a running absorbable suture. All 3 patients had uneventful recoveries, but presented 7 to 8 weeks postoperatively with acute abdominal pain and peritoneal signs. Exploratory laparoscopy in these patients revealed a perforation at the J-J anastomosis. No apparent reason for the perforation was found in 2 patients. These perforations were repaired laparoscopically with absorbable suture. The third patient had an obstruction at the J-J anastomosis from an phytobezoar and required conversion to open technique due to limited pneumoperitoneum. All 3 patients recovered uneventfully. Late perforation of the J-J anastomosis is a very rare complication. Primary laparoscopic repair is a feasible and safe choice of treatment.     

Initial results with a stapled gastrojejunostomy for the laparoscopic isolated roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: The gastric pouch to jejunum anastomosis is a critical step in the performance of an isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. When performing this procedure laparoscopically, intracorporeal suturing of the gastric pouch to Roux-en-Y jejunum anastomosis is technically demanding, time consuming, and perhaps the most prohibitive part of the operation. We devised a unique, effective, and simple method to perform this anastomosis using an EEA stapler. This report describes this technique and its follow-up in our series of patients undergoing a laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass utilizing this technique. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed identifying the technical success, leak rate, and postoperative incidence of anastomotic stenosis and its management in a consecutive series of patients undergoing a laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a gastrojejunal anastomosis constructed with a 21-mm or 25-mm EEA stapler. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Mean age was 40.9 years (range 22 to 64) and mean body mass index was 52.3 kg/m(2) (range 31 to 76 kg/m(2)). There were no mortalities. Three patients (6.3%) were converted to an open procedure, but only 1 because of an inability to perform the gastrojejunal anastomosis (short jejunal mesentery). There was 1 leak (2.1%) from the gastrojejunal anastomosis. It was successfully managed nonoperatively. Thirteen patients (27.1%) patients developed an anastomotic stenosis requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation. Seven of the 13 patients required only a single dilatation and have had no recurrence of dysphagia. Six of the 13 patients needed 2 to 4 dilatations, and all are swallowing normally. None have required surgical revision. After 12 months of follow-up, the mean weight loss was 115 pounds and mean decrease in body mass index was 18.5 kg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: The stapled EEA gastrojejunal anastomosis for the laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe and effective. Anastomotic stenosis occurs in approximately one quarter of patients, but it can be managed well with endoscopic balloon dilatation.