The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients

OBJECTIVE: To modify an existing outcome measure (Bournemouth Questionnaire [BQ]) for use in patients with nonspecific neck pain and test its psychometric properties. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study in which the questionnaire was administered on 3 occasions (pretreatment, retest, and posttreatment). SETTING: Anglo-European College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic and 8 field chiropractic practices. METHOD: Seven core items relating to the biopsychosocial model of pain were included in the original questionnaire (back BQ). The wording of one of these items (disability in activities of daily living) was modified to include activities likely to be affected by neck pain. Testing of the neck BQ was carried out in 102 patients with nonspecific neck pain. RESULTS: The instrument demonstrated high internal consistency on 3 administrations (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87, 0.91, 0.92). All 7 items were retained on the basis that they each significantly contributed to the total score (item-corrected total score correlations >0.43) and to the instrument's responsiveness to clinical change (item change-corrected total change score correlations >0.42). The instrument was reliable in test-retest administrations in stable subjects (ICC = 0.65). The instrument demonstrated acceptable construct validity and longitudinal construct validity with established external measures. The treatment effect size of the instrument was found to be high (1.67). CONCLUSION: The neck BQ covers the salient dimensions of the biopsychosocial model of pain, is quick and easy to complete, and has been shown to be reliable, valid, and responsive to clinically significant change in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Its use as an outcome measure in clinical trials and outcomes research is recommended.     

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?

It has been suggested that the quality of clinical trials should be assessed by blinded raters to limit the risk of introducing bias into meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and into the peer-review process. There is very little evidence in the literature to substantiate this. This study describes the development of an instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality. A multidisciplinary panel of six judges produced an initial version of the instrument. Fourteen raters from three different backgrounds assessed the quality of 36 research reports in pain research, selected from three different samples. Seven were allocated randomly to perform the assessments under blind conditions. The final version of the instrument included three items. These items were scored consistently by all the raters regardless of background and could discriminate between reports from the different samples. Blind assessments produced significantly lower and more consistent scores than open assessments. The implications of this finding for systematic reviews, meta-analytic research and the peer-review process are discussed.     

Predictive value of fear avoidance in developing chronic neck pain disability: consequences for clinical decision making

OBJECTIVE: To improve clinical decision making in posttraumatic neck pain by investigating the additional value of fear-avoidance variables in predicting chronic neck pain disability. DESIGN: An inception cohort with baseline assessment 1 week posttrauma and outcome assessment 24 weeks posttrauma. Predictive factors include pain intensity, Neck Disability Index (NDI), catastrophizing, fear of movement (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia [TSK]), and avoidance muscle behavior. SETTING: Hospital emergency department of a general hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 90 people reporting of pain in neck or head region after a motor vehicle collision. Eighty-two subjects (91.1%) of the sample provided 24-week follow-up on the outcome. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The NDI assessing physical disability of subjects with neck pain. RESULTS: By using a combination of the baseline NDI and TSK, it appears to be possible to predict chronic disability with a probability of 54.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.2%-72.3%) after entering the NDI (cutoff, 15) as a first test, and with a probability of 83.3% (95% CI, 70.3%-91.3%) after entering the TSK (cutoff, 40) in a second test. CONCLUSIONS: A simple rating of baseline neck pain disability within a week of the trauma, separately or in combination with a test for fear of movement, can be used to predict future outcome. Patients showing fear of movement can be offered an intervention that focuses on reduction of this fear.     

Psychometric properties of the neck disability index amongst patients with chronic neck pain using item response theory

Objective: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is commonly used for clinical and research assessment for chronic neck pain, yet the original version of this tool has not undergone significant validity testing, and in particular, there has been minimal assessment using Item Response Theory. The goal of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the original version of the NDI in a large sample of individuals with chronic neck pain by defining its internal consistency, construct structure and validity, and its ability to discriminate between different degrees of functional limitation.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional cohort study of 585 consecutive patients with chronic neck pain seen in a university hospital rehabilitation clinic. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, construct structure was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis, and discrimination ability was determined by Item Response Theory.

Results: The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency assessed by Cronbach’s alpha (0.87). The exploratory factor analysis identified only one factor with eigenvalue considered significant (cutoff 1.0). When analyzed by Item Response Theory, eight out of 10 items demonstrated almost ideal difficulty parameter estimates. In addition, eight out of 10 items showed high to perfect estimates of discrimination ability (overall range 0.8 to 2.9).

Conclusions: Amongst patients with chronic neck pain, the NDI was found to have good internal consistency, have unidimensional properties, and an excellent ability to distinguish patients with different levels of perceived disability.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Neck Disability Index has good internal consistency, unidimensional properties, and an excellent ability to distinguish patients with different levels of perceived disability.

• The Neck Disability Index is recommended for use when selecting patients for rehabilitation, setting rehabilitation goals, and measuring the outcome of intervention.

     

Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain.

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; Cleeland and associates) has been used primarily to assess patients with cancer-related pain. Although it has been validated in many languages and is widely used, there has not yet been research published to validate its use for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain as the primary presenting problem. This study was designed to fill this gap by examining the psychometric properties of the BPI in 440 patients with chronic intractable pain referred to a chronic pain clinic at a metropolitan tertiary-care teaching hospital. Results indicated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficients were.85 for the intensity items and.88 for the interference items). A factor analysis resulted in 2 distinct and independent factors, supporting the validity of the 2-factor structure of the BPI. Zero-order correlations indicated that the association with a measure of disability (the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]) was significantly higher for BPI interference (r = 0.57) than for BPI intensity (r = 0.40, t = 5.71, P <.01) and that the correlation with BPI interference was not more than 0.80, supporting the conclusion that these scales assess related, but also distinct, dimensions. Finally, the finding that both BPI scales showed statistically significant improvement with treatment confirms the responsivity of BPI in detecting and reflecting improvement in pain over time. PERSPECTIVE: This paper validated the psychometric properties of a pain Assessment instrument (The Brief Pain Inventory) originally developed to assess cancer pain and extended its use for the chronic nonmalignant pain population. This provides an important and widely used diagnostic tool for the clinician treating chronic pain.     

Mechanical Pain Sensitivity and the Severity of Chronic Neck Pain and Disability Are Not Modulated Across the Menstrual Cycle

Despite the high prevalence of neck pain among women, menstrual effects on regional pain outcomes have not been investigated in this clinical population. This study evaluated menstrual effects on mechanical pain sensitivity (pressure pain threshold [PPT]), neck pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale [NPRS]), and neck-related disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI]) in 22 normally menstruating (NM) and 17 hormonal contraceptive users with chronic neck pain. Sex hormones, PPT, and NDI were measured during the early follicular (F1), late follicular (F2), and luteal (L) menstrual phases. Daily NPRS scores were recorded in an online symptom diary and averaged within each phase. Estradiol and progesterone increased only for NM women in F2 and L, respectively. Phase effects on PPT (η² = .003), NDI (η² = .003), and NPRS (η² = .016) for NM women were small and did not differ from those for the hormonal contraceptive users (P ≥ .386). Averaged across the menstrual cycle, PPT scores explained 29% of the variance in NPRS scores for NM women but were not associated with NDI scores in either group. Results indicate that the magnitude of menstrual effects on mechanical pain sensitivity and the severity of neck pain and disability do not exceed thresholds of clinically detectable change in women with chronic neck pain.     

Prospective Cohort Study of Patients With Neck Pain in a Manual Therapy Setting: Design and Baseline Measures

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to describe the design and baseline measurements of a prospective multicenter cohort study in patients with neck pain treated by Dutch manual therapists. Objectives of the study were to determine which patients seek help from a manual therapist, to describe usual care manual therapy in patients with neck pain, to examine the occurrence of nonserious adverse events after treatment, to describe predictors of adverse events, and to determine whether the occurrence of nonserious adverse events affect outcome after manual therapy care.MethodsDuring a 3-month inclusion period, consecutive patients aged between 18 and 80 years presenting with neck pain in manual therapy practices in The Netherlands were included in the study. Baseline questionnaires included the Numeric Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and Patient Expectancy List. Within the treatment episode, manual therapist clinical reasoning and applied interventions were registered and patients reported on adverse events. At the end of the treatment episode and at 12-month follow-up, pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), functional outcomes (NDI, Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire), personal factors (FABQ), and global perceived effect were measured.ResultsDuring the 3-month inclusion period, 263 participating manual therapists collected data on 1193 patients with neck pain. Most patients (69.4%) were female. The mean age was 44.7 (±13.7) years. The NDI showed overall mild disability (mean score 26%). Mean scores in pain intensity were moderate (4.8), and there was low risk of prolonged disability owing to personal factors (FABQ).ConclusionThis study provides information on baseline characteristics of patients visiting manual therapists for neck pain. In The Netherlands, patients seeking care of manual therapists are comparable to patients in other countries regarding demographics and neck pain characteristics.     

刮痧对颈型颈椎病疼痛和颈部功能恢复的影响

目的探讨刮痧对颈型颈椎病疼痛和颈部功能恢复的影响。方法便利抽样法选取2012年2—10月在江苏省中医院推拿科门诊初诊的颈型颈椎病患者114例为研究对象,按门诊的先后将其分为对照组（n=54）和观察组（n=60）,对照组患者采用推拿手法进行治疗,观察组患者采用刮痧疗法。干预前后采用McGill疼痛问卷（McGill pain questionnaire,MPQ）和颈椎功能障碍指数量表（the neck disabilit yindex,NDI）对患者的疼痛和颈椎功能进行评估,并比较两组患者干预后不良反应发生情况。结果干预后,观察组和对照组的MPQ疼痛量表各条目和总积分、颈椎功能障碍指数量表评分均明显降低,差异有统计学意义（均P〈0．01）;两组患者MPQ疼痛量表各项条目和MPQ总分的差异均有统计学意义（均P％0．01）。观察组有3例患者首次刮痧时有晕刮现象,对照组未发现有其他任何不良反应发生。结论刮痧和推拿均可明显缓解颈型颈椎病患者的疼痛程度,改善患者的颈椎功能,刮痧对颈型颈椎病患者的疼痛改善效果优于推拿。     

Measuring practitioner/therapist effects in randomised trials of low back pain and neck pain interventions in primary care settings

In psychological health treatment studies it has been shown that differences between therapists account for some of the non‐specific effect of treatment but this phenomenon has not so far systematically been investigated in musculoskeletal disorders. In this study we evaluated and compared the size and potential influence of the ‘practitioner effect’ (or ‘therapist effect’) in three randomised treatment trials of low back pain and neck pain patients in primary care. We calculated the proportion of variance in outcomes attributable to differences across practitioners, i.e. the practitioner–variance partition coefficient (p–vpc). As measures of outcome, we focused on self‐reported disability as the primary outcome, but we also investigated assessed psychological outcomes. The p–vpc for the disability measures ranged from 2.6% to 7.1% across trials and time points (post treatment and follow up). Estimates differed between treatment subgroups within trials; being highest in treatment subgroups assigned to psychosocial‐based interventions. A ‘practitioner effect’ does exist and is more pronounced in treatments involving greater psychosocial emphasis. This has implications for both practice and research in this clinical area. It highlights the importance of patient–practitioner interactions, and the need to address practitioner effects in designing and analysing outcome studies in low back pain and neck pain in primary care.     

激痛点缺血性压迫治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征疗效观察

目的:观察激痛点缺血性压迫法治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效。方法:选择颈肩肌筋疼痛膜综合征患者20例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和治疗组,每组10例。对照组仅接受健康宣教;治疗组在对照组基础上实施激痛点缺血性压迫疗法。首先通过Booster Pro3筋膜枪渐次提高振动频率的方法松解斜方肌上束,提高痛阈,达到放松并激活上斜方肌的目的,随后使用缺血性压迫激痛点的方法进行干预,治疗1次/d,连续治疗2周。分别在治疗前、后,采用肌力与脊柱活动度测量仪测量颈部关节活动度与肌力,采用疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价颈肩部的疼痛程度,采用颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)评价颈部功能障碍水平。结果:与治疗前比较,治疗第1次结束即刻治疗组左右侧肌力明显增加,治疗后2周治疗组颈部关节活动度(前屈方向)、左右侧肌力明显增加,左屈、右屈、右旋方向上的VAS评分与NDI评分明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与对照组比较,治疗后2周治疗组颈部关节活动度(前屈方向)、左右侧肌力更高,左屈、右屈、右旋方向上的VAS评分与NDI评分更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:激痛点缺血性压迫疗法治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征,可以有效提高MPS患者颈部关节活动度、左右侧肌力,缓解颈部肌肉僵硬不适和疼痛,改善颈椎功能障碍状态,值得临床推广应用。     

The use of fear-avoidance beliefs and nonorganic signs in predicting prolonged disability in patients with neck pain

Psychological factors, such as fear-avoidance beliefs and nonorganic signs, have been postulated to play a role in the development of prolonged disability. The purpose of this study was to determine if fear-avoidance beliefs and nonorganic behavior are predictive of disability in patients with neck pain. Seventy-nine patients, with neck pain, were recruited from five outpatient physiotherapy clinics. Each of the patients completed a modified Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and was evaluated for the presence of cervical nonorganic signs (CNOS). The FABQ consists of two subscales pertaining to work (FABQ-W) and physical activity (FABQ-PA). The patients also completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) during the initial examination and 12 weeks later. A 12-week NDI score 15 was operationally defined as prolonged disability. In order to determine the overall predictive ability of the FABQ and CNOS, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.782 (CNOS), 0.833 (FABQ-Total), 0.782 (FABQ-W) and 0.814 (FABQ-PA). Results from this study suggest that the FABQ and testing for CNOS are both good tools for predicting patients who may develop prolonged disability.     

The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)

The complexity of chronic pain has represented a major dilemma for clinical researchers interested in the reliable and valid assessment of the problem and the evaluation of treatment approaches. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) was developed in order to fill a widely recognized void in the assessment of clinical pain. Assets of the inventory are its brevity and clarity, its foundation in contemporary psychological theory, its multidimensional focus, and its strong psychometric properties. Three parts of the inventory, comprised of 12 scales, examine the impact of pain on the patients' lives, the responses of others to the patients' communications of pain, and the extent to which patients participate in common daily activities. The instrument is recommended for use in conjunction with behavioral and psychophysiological assessment strategies in the evaluation of chronic pain patients in clinical settings. The utility of the WHYMPI in empirical investigations of chronic pain is also discussed.     

The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Currently, large levels of practice variability exist regarding the clinical deactivation of trigger points. Manual physical therapy has been identified as a potential means of resolving active trigger points; however, to date the ideal treatment approach has yet to be elucidated. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of two manual treatment regimens on individuals with upper trapezius trigger points. Sixty patients, 19–38 years of age with non-specific neck pain and upper trapezius trigger points, were randomized into one of two, 4 week physical therapy programs. One group received muscle energy techniques while the second group received an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) consisting of muscle energy techniques, ischemic compression, and strain–counterstrain (SCS). Outcomes including a visual analog pain scale (VAS), the neck disability index (NDI), and lateral cervical flexion range of motion (ROM) were collected at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Results revealed large pre–post-effect sizes within the INIT group (Cohen’s d  =  0.97, 0.94 and 0.97). Additionally, significantly greater improvements in pain and neck disability and lateral cervical flexion ROM were detected in favor of the INIT group (0.29–0.57, 0.57–1.12 and 0.29–0.57) at a 95% CI respectively. The findings of this study indicate the potential benefit of an integrated approach in deactivating upper trapezius trigger points. Further research should be performed to investigate the long-term benefits of the current treatment approach.     

Behinderungseinschätzung bei chronischen Schmerzpatienten

Despite its importance for chronic pain diseases, pain-related disability is a poorly defined concept with theoretical deficits. The distinction between impairment, disability, and handicap proposed by the WHO is an important contribution to clarification of the disability construct. With reference to four criteria (underlying disability construct, degree of behaviour generalization, assessment mode, scope) different assessment procedures of pain-related disability are presented and the advantages and disadvantages of each are discussed. A multidimensional approach to pain-related disability is advocated. Diagnostic information yielded by different assessment procedures should be viewed as complementary rather than as exclusive data sources. A German version of a self-report instrument (Pain Disability Index) that assesses disability in chronic pain patients is presented. The results from four data sets concerning different aspects of reliability and validity confirm the good psychometric properties of the instrument. The instrument can be used in chronic pain research as well as in clinical contexts. It is recommended that subjective disability data be complemented by behavioral observation and additional data sources (e.g. assessment of disability by the spouse/partner).     

Manual therapy for neck pain: an overview of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews

Manual therapy for neck pain enjoys a long history, with increasing popularity in recent times. The evidence base for manual therapies for neck pain consists of a reasonably large body of clinical trials, an even greater number of systematic reviews and, more recently, a number of practice guidelines. We have conducted several systematic reviews pertaining to the evidence base for both acute and chronic neck pain as well as for the outcome of control groups of chronic neck pain subjects in clinical trials of conservative therapies. In this review, we first provide background material on the definition and characterization of manual therapies as well as on the epidemiology of neck pain. We then review our recent systematic reviews on manual therapies for acute and chronic neck pain without whiplash. Finally, we provide brief, original reviews of, first, the literature on the treatment of whiplash injury by manual therapies followed by the current practice guidelines pertaining to manual therapies for neck pain. While there are several publications, especially those registered with the Cochrane Collaboration, that are currently the authoritative evaluations of the use of manual therapies for neck pain, the present review is designed to present a broad overview of the topic with a distinctive approach emphasizing the analysis of change scores in the clinical trials. It is hoped that this will benefit researchers and clinicians alike in their management of neck pain patients.     

Changes in Cervicocephalic Kinesthetic Sensibility,Widespread Pressure Pain Sensitivity,and Neck Pain After Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

The purpose of the current randomized clinical trial was to examine the effects of cervical thrust manipulation or sham manipulation on cervicocephalic kinaesthetic sense, pain, pain-related disability, and pressure pain sensitivity in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Interaction of psychosocial risk factors explain increased neck problems among female office workers

This study investigated the relationship between psychosocial risk factors and (1) neck symptoms and (2) neck pain and disability as measured by the neck disability index (NDI). Female office workers employed in local private and public organizations were invited to participate, with 333 completing a questionnaire. Data were collected on various risk factors including age, negative affectivity, history of previous neck trauma, physical work environment, and task demands. Sixty-one percent of the sample reported neck symptoms lasting greater than 8 days in the last 12 months. The mean NDI of the sample was 15.5 out of 100, indicating mild neck pain and disability. In a hierarchical multivariate logistic regression, low supervisor support was the only psychosocial risk factor identified with the presence of neck symptoms. Similarly, low supervisor support was the only factor associated with the score on the NDI. These associations remained after adjustment for potential confounders of age, negative affectivity, and physical risk factors. The interaction of job demands, decision authority, and supervisor support was significantly associated with the NDI in the final model and this association increased when those with previous trauma were excluded. Interestingly, and somewhat contrary to initial expectations, as job demands increased, high decision authority had an increasing effect on the NDI when supervisor support was low.     

Quantitative sensory measures distinguish office workers with varying levels of neck pain and disability

This study was undertaken to investigate any relationship between sensory features and neck pain in female office workers using quantitative sensory measures to better understand neck pain in this group. Office workers who used a visual display monitor for more than four hours per day with varying levels of neck pain and disability were eligible for inclusion. There were 85 participants categorized according to their scores on the neck disability index (NDI): 33 with no pain (NDI<8); 38 with mild levels of pain and disability (NDI 9-29); 14 with moderate levels of pain (NDI30). A fourth group of women without neck pain (n=22) who did not work formed the control group. Measures included: thermal pain thresholds over the posterior cervical spine; pressure pain thresholds over the posterior neck, trapezius, levator scapulae and tibialis anterior muscles, and the median nerve trunk; sensitivity to vibrotactile stimulus over areas of the hand innervated by the median, ulnar and radial nerves; sympathetic vasoconstrictor response. All tests were conducted bilaterally. ANCOVA models were used to determine group differences between the means for each sensory measure. Office workers with greater self-reported neck pain demonstrated hyperalgesia to thermal stimuli over the neck, hyperalgesia to pressure stimulation over several sites tested; hypoaesthesia to vibration stimulation but no changes in the sympathetic vasoconstrictor response. There is evidence of multiple peripheral nerve dysfunction with widespread sensitivity most likely due to altered central nociceptive processing initiated and sustained by nociceptive input from the periphery.     

Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundMechanical neck pain is one of the common musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle energy technique (MET) may be a useful intervention for treating such disorder.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the effect of MET with passive stretching on pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty patients with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either the MET group or control group. The former group received MET, and the latter group received static stretching. Both groups received conventional therapy. Treatment was given once a day for 6 days. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the intensity of pain, and functional disability was assessed using the neck disability index (NDI) was immediately before treatment and again on the 6^th day.ResultsVAS and NDI scores showed a significant improvement in both MET and stretching groups on the 6^th day postintervention (p < 0.05). However, both VAS and NDI scores showed better improvement in the MET group as compared to the stretching group (p < 0.025).ConclusionMuscle energy technique was better than stretching technique in improving pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.     

Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G)

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used questionnaire in the assessment of disability of neck patients. The aim of this study was to translate the NDI according to established guidelines into German (NDI-G) and to test the psychometric properties. Patients with acute (ACU) and chronic neck pain (CHR) and a healthy control group (HCG) completed the NDI-G twice with a mean test–retest interval of 3 days. The total score of NDI-G showed high reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1) = 0.92) and a high Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.96). The minimal detectable change was 7 points. The Bland–Altman plot revealed a small positive systematic error of 1.02 points. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant differences in the NDI-G total score among the three groups (χ² = 29.77, p < 0.001). Mann–Whitney U tests showed significant differences in the total score between ACU and HCG (p < 0.001), and CHR and HCG (p < 0.001). The factor analysis of NDI-G yielded 2 factors that together explained 67% of the variance. Spearman's phi coefficients showed no correlation between the NDI-G total score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the ACU group (phi = 0.23, p = 0.40), and a moderate correlation in the CHR group (phi = 0.55, p = 0.03). The item analysis of the NDI-G revealed moderate to good reliability for all items. Only the item ‘work’ could differentiate between the ACU and CHR group. The NDI-G emerged from this study as a valid and reliable assessment. Its psychometric properties are comparable with the original version. Thus, the NDI-G is recommended for research and clinical settings in neck pain in German speaking countries.