Comparison of preoperative simultaneous stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy and stereotactic core needle biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative results of stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy (S-FNAB) with stereotactic core needle biopsy (S-CNB) performed simultaneously in breast lesions with the postoperative histopathological diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of all histological grades. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 733 consecutive stereotactic biopsies were performed between May 1993 and June 1999. In 72 patients with mammographic findings suspicious of malignancy who were subjected to breast surgery, postoperative histopathology showed DCIS. Preoperatively, S-FNAB and S-CNB had been done simultaneously in all patients, S-FNAB with spinal needle 0.7 or 0.9 mm and S-CNB was performed with an automated 2.1-mm biopsy gun. An average of 3 S-FNABs and 3 S-CNBs were performed in each patient. RESULTS: In 56 (78%) of the 72 patients S-CNB showed DCIS. In 3 patients (4%) the S-CNB revealed "probable carcinoma", in 7 patients (10%) "atypia" and in 6, the lesions were benign. In 34 (47%) of the 72 women S-FNABs showed carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In 6 cases (8%) the S-FNABs showed "probable carcinoma" and in 12 patients (17%) "atypia"; 8 lesions were benign and 12 not diagnostic. CONCLUSION: S-CNB was superior to S-FNAB in diagnosing DCIS. Only 6 patients (8%) received a benign or non-diagnostic preoperative diagnosis with S-CNB compared to 20 patients (28%) with S-FNAB. S-CNB was superior to S-FNAB for preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, but S-FNAB could further increase the sensitivity of the biopsy since it diagnosed cancer in 4 cases where S-CNB showed benign material.     

全数字化X线立体定位及活体组织检查对诊治乳腺不可触及病变的价值

目的：探讨全数字化X线立体定位及活体组织检查对临床不可触及乳腺病变（NPBL）的诊断及应用价值。方法95例临床触诊阴性乳腺数字钼靶摄片发现微小病变。乳腺影像报告和数据系统（BI-RADS）分级4或4以上。27例行立体定位穿刺活检（SCNB）;68例行立体定位下导丝引导活检（SNLB）。结果27例SCNB,25例病理结果一致,2例病理结果低估,活检符合率92％。68例SNLB均定位成功,病变完全切除,符合率100％。结论 SCNB使乳腺良性病变切取数目降到最低,创伤小、费用低,诊断准确率高。SNLB获得的病理诊断准确、可靠。两者相比较SNLB弥补了SCNB的取材不足及假阴性,能够获得可靠的病理结果,一次同时完成诊断和治疗。     

Radial scars diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: surgical biopsy findings

We retrospectively reviewed surgical biopsy findings of lesions diagnosed as radial scars (RS) at stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB). RS was diagnosed in 52 of 1415 (3.7%) consecutive mammographically detected lesions that underwent 14-gauge automated SCNB. Subsequent surgical biopsy findings were available for 43 lesions in 41 women constituting the study group. Of these 43 lesions, histopathological analysis of the surgical specimen yielded RS in 27 (63%), RS plus atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in 8 (18%), RS plus carcinoma in five (12%), and only carcinoma in three (7%). Carcinomas underestimated at SCNB (n=8) were two in situ carcinomas, two invasive ductal carcinomas not otherwise specified, and four tubular carcinomas. A statistically significant difference (P=0.02) was found between the mean pathologic size of RS without carcinoma and of RS containing carcinoma. Mammographic features could not be used reliably to predict the presence of carcinoma at excision of lesions diagnosed as RS at SCNB. The results suggest that the diagnosis of RS at 14-gauge SCNB of mammographically detected lesions is an indication for surgical biopsy because of the high prevalence of carcinoma in these lesions.     

Follow-up of benign results of stereotactic core breast biopsy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to obtain long-term follow-up data on women with benign histologic results of a breast stereotactic core needle biopsy (CNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammography charts of 300 consecutive women who underwent prone stereotactic CNB with digital radiography were reviewed. Women with frankly malignant or suspicious histologic findings (51 patients) or a technically unsuccessful stereotactic CNB (one patient) were excluded. The remaining 248 benign core biopsies in 229 women were included in the study. RESULTS: Follow-up mammograms were obtained for 152 lesions with benign histologic results following stereotactic CNB. The mean length of follow-up after stereotactic CNB was 34.6 months. Cancer was diagnosed in six women who underwent surgical biopsies 1/2 to 30 months after benign stereotactic CNB. An initial chart review demonstrated that no follow-up data were available for 64 lesions, and information was missing for an additional seven. CONCLUSION: SCNB remains a sampling procedure that can result in false-negative histologic results. Intrinsic procedural issues were identified that could minimize the potential for missing a malignancy. Goals for patient compliance with follow-up recommendations fell short of expectations.     

全数字化乳腺X线立体定位及活检技术对早期乳腺癌诊断及治疗的价值

目的探讨全数字化乳腺X线立体定位及活检技术对早期乳腺癌的诊断及治疗价值。资料与方法回顾性总结36例临床未触及病变,仅X线摄影发现乳腺微小病变患者的临床及影像资料,用全数字化X线立体定位导丝导向切除活检(stereotactic needle localized biopsy,SNLB)或核芯针穿刺活检(stereotactic core needle biopsy,SCNB)。结果 30例行SNLB患者中,29例一次性成功,成功率达96.7%;6例行SCNB者中,1例乳腺癌漏诊。结论应用全数字化乳腺X线立体定位及活检技术,可有效提高早期乳腺癌的诊断率,可对微创手术治疗提供精确的导向作用。     

乳腺立体定位核芯针活检的病理组织学低估原因分析

目的 分析乳腺立体定位核芯针活检的病理组织学低估的原因,以期引起临床多学科的重视及客观对待.方法 2000年9月至2005年9月,对146例乳腺病变患者(179个病变)进行立体定位核芯针病变部位穿刺活检,发生病理组织学低估21个.病变均不可触及(NPBL),根据乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI.RADS),活检前诊断BI-RADS m类6个,Ⅳ类12个,V类3个,影像表现为钙化16个,肿块2个,不对称性致密1个,星芒征2个.结果 活检为纤维囊性乳腺病并导管上皮不典型增生11个,手术诊断为导管原位癌7个,伴早期浸润4个;活检为重度乳腺导管不典型增生3个,手术诊断为原位癌1个,原位癌伴早期浸润2个;活检为乳腺导管原位癌3个,手术证实均为浸润性癌;活检为乳头状病变4个,手术证实为原位癌及伴早期浸润各1个、浸润性导管癌及乳腺导管内乳头状腺癌各1个.结论 乳腺核芯针活检的病理组织学低估与立体定位技术、病变本身及医师的认识有关,放射科医师应熟练掌握活检技术并力求全面取材,当穿刺活检结果与影像表现不符时,应重新评价病变的实际病理诊断.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted?

PURPOSE: To determine whether mammographic or histologic features can be used to predict which cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without invasion by means of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) will have invasive disease at surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1992 to March 1999, DCIS without invasion was diagnosed by means of SCNB in 59 patients. Seventeen (29%) were found to have invasive disease after surgery. The underestimation rate for SCNB was compared with that obtained by means of open surgical biopsy. Mammographic and histologic features of cases with and those without invasion were compared. RESULTS: All patients had calcifications on mammograms. There was no significant difference (P: =.26) between the underestimation rate for SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device and that for open surgical biopsy. No statistically significant differences between cases with and those without invasion were seen in patient age, mean number of core specimens, level of suspicion, size of lesion, distribution and morphology of the calcifications, presence of an associated mass or density, subtype of DCIS, nuclear grade, or presence of necrosis or desmoplasia. CONCLUSION: Mammographic and histologic features cannot be used reliably to predict cases that are underestimated with SCNB. However, SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device was as reliable as open surgical biopsy for diagnosing DCIS without invasion.     

Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of papillary lesions, radial scars, or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 1,236 lesions sampled with SCNB yielded 22 papillary lesions, nine radial scars, and five LCIS lesions. Diffuse lesions such as papillomatosis, papillary ductal hyperplasia, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and atypical lobular hyperplasia were not included. The mammographic findings, associated histologic features, and outcome were assessed for each case. RESULTS: Sixteen papillary lesions were diagnosed as benign at SCNB. Of these, five were benign at excision, and 10 were unremarkable at mammographic follow-up. At excision of an unusual lesion containing a microscopic papillary lesion, DCIS was found. Three of four papillary lesions suspicious at SCNB proved to be papillary carcinomas; the fourth had no residual carcinoma at excision. Eight of nine radial scars were excised, which revealed atypical hyperplasia in four scars but no malignancies. One LCIS lesion was found at excision to contain DCIS. CONCLUSION: Benign or malignant papillary lesions were accurately diagnosed with SCNB in the majority of cases. Cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy or with atypia or unusual associated histologic findings should be excised. No malignancies were found at excision of radial scars diagnosed at SCNB. Surgical removal of these lesions following SCNB may not be routinely necessary. DCIS was found in one lesion diagnosed as LCIS at SCNB, which suggests that removal of these lesions may be prudent.     

Needle tract seeding after vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

Background: A matter of substantial concern regarding all needle biopsy techniques is seeding along the biopsy needle tract.

Purpose: To assess cell seeding along the needle tract of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB).

Material and Methods: The study included 21 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 10 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) diagnosed by VABB for nonpalpable mammographic lesions. VABB (11G, on a Fischer table) was performed, and the duration of the procedure was measured. After surgery, the whole needle tract was embedded in paraffin blocks, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and examined by a pathologist.

Results: Cases with dissemination of cancer cells in the needle tract were not observed (one-sided 97.5% CI 0-10.0%). In 2/31 (6.5%) cases (95% CI 0.8-21.4%), benign epithelial cell displacement was observed, and the duration of VABB was significantly longer in these two cases (52.5±3.5 min vs. 42.0±4.4 min for cases without benign cell displacement; P = 0.018, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for independent samples).

Conclusion: No displacement of malignant cells within the 11G needle tract was documented. Benign cell displacement was associated with longer VABB duration. The phenomenon of tumor cell dissemination along the needle tract is of questionable clinical significance when the treatment guidelines are followed.     

Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification

AIM: To identify pre-operative factors which predict presence of invasive disease within mammographically detected malignant microcalcification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 116 serial stereotactic core needle biopsies (SCNBs) performed on malignant mammographic calcification. Final surgical pathology was correlated with pre-operative features (clinical, radiological and core histology) in an attempt to predict the presence of an invasive component. RESULTS: Thirty-eight clusters contained invasive carcinoma. The sensitivity of SCNB for invasion was 55%. Clinical features, calcium morphology and cluster size were not shown to be predictive of invasive disease. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of high grade on core histology and increasing number of calcifications were predictive of increased risk of invasion (high grade core biopsy DCIS and > 40 calcifications 48% invasive at surgical histology; high grade core biopsy DCIS and < 40 calcifications 15% invasive; non-high grade core biopsy DCIS 0% invasive). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of those clusters diagnosed as DCIS by percutaneous biopsy which are likely to harbour an invasive component is possible. It would seem reasonable to consider staging the axilla at therapeutic surgery in these patients.     

高频乳腺X线立体定位穿刺活检术的操作技术

目的　阐述乳腺X线立体定位穿刺活检术 (SCNB)的操作步骤并探讨技术操作过程中的注意事项。方法　对 36处 ( 32例 )乳腺可疑病灶进行了SCNB检查。主要操作过程包括机器校正、选择及固定体位、依次进行扫描及预定穿刺点坐标后进行穿刺活检。结果　 2 9处病灶SCNB病理与手术病理结果相同 ,SCNB诊断符合率和穿刺失败率分别为 80 .6 % ( 2 9/36 )和 8.3% ( 3/36 )。结论　SCNB具有技术先进、定位准确、诊断准确率高 ,损伤小、安全性高 ,病人易于接受等优点。在实施该技术过程中 ,注意机器校正、病人体位固定和穿刺点位置及深度的选择等步骤技术操作 ,是确保SCNB的准确率和可靠性的关键     

Learning curve for add-on stereotactic core needle breast biopsy

Purpose: To evaluate the learning curve for an add-on 14 G stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB).

Material and Methods: A total of 231 non-palpable breast lesions that had undergone add-on SCNB were evaluated in this prospective study. Five radiologists performed their first three biopsies under supervision. Subsequent, independently performed, biopsies were also evaluated. The samples were collected in three different containers: the first sample in container A, the second and third samples in container B, and subsequent samples in container C (available for four radiologists from the first biopsy on). Technically successful biopsies and false-negative rate in three container combinations (A, A+B, A+B+C) were reported as a function of operator experience.

Results: Technically unsuccessful biopsies occurred significantly more often in microcalcifications than in masses (14.9% versus 3.8%; P = 0.04). For microcalcifications, the rate of successful biopsies was 75% (18/24) for the first 5 biopsies and 87.8% (79/90) for the subsequent biopsies (P = 0.335); rates for the masses were 95.7% (22/23) and 96.3% (79/82) (P = 1.0), respectively. A tendency was noted for the false-negative rate to be higher for the first five biopsies in three container combinations than in subsequent cases.

Conclusion: Our results support the existence of a learning curve, especially in the biopsy of microcalcifications. More than three mentor-guided biopsies are needed.     

Automated stereotactic core needle biopsy of microcalcifications with correlation to surgical biopsy.

PURPOSE: To compare pathologic findings from stereotactic core and excisional biopsies in patients with microcalcifications in the breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stereotactic core needle biopsies of 101 lesions with mammographic evidence of microcalcifications were performed with long-throw (2.2 cm) automated core biopsy devices fitted with 2.1-mm needles. The core specimens were placed on microscope slides and radiographed. The pathologic features of core and excisional specimens were compared. RESULTS: In 100 of the 101 breast lesions, a correct choice for an additional diagnostic procedure or definitive treatment could have been made upon histopathologic findings of the core needle biopsy. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic core needle biopsy is a reliable alternative to surgical biopsy of breast lesions with microcalcifications provided that specimen radiography has been performed to ensure that appropriate tissue has been obtained. Excisional biopsy may be avoided if microcalcifications are visible in radiographs of core biopsy specimen with benign histology.     

Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the incidence of papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at imaging-guided core needle biopsy and the need for surgical excision after a benign diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 1374 patients with consecutive suspicious breast lesions that underwent either mammography or sonographically guided large-core needle breast biopsy. Fifty-seven lesions (4%) were classified as papillary lesions. Eleven of the 57 cases were lost to follow-up (n = 6) or had not yet shown 2 years of stability (n = 5) and were excluded from this study. The remaining 46 papillary lesions constitute our study population. RESULTS: Surgical excision was performed in 17 (37%) of 46 papillary lesions. In the group of patients whose lesions were recommended for excision because carcinoma was identified at core biopsy, surgical excision revealed one false-positive and two true-positive diagnoses. In four cases, histologic diagnoses of the excisional biopsy and the core needle biopsy were discordant. One false-positive finding at core needle biopsy initially was interpreted as invasive ductal carcinoma on the basis of core needle biopsy specimens. In three false-negative findings, the initial diagnosis at core needle biopsy was upgraded after surgical excision. Two cases of papilloma with adjacent atypical ductal hyperplasia and one of atypical papilloma were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ after surgical excision. Imaging follow-up was performed in the remaining 29 patients. All lesions were stable or had decreased in size during the 2-year follow-up period. The negative predictive value of core needle biopsy for excluding malignancy among the papillary lesions diagnosed in our study was 93%. CONCLUSION: When the histologic diagnosis is benign, our data suggest that papillary lesions may be safely managed with imaging follow-up rather than with surgical excision. However, atypical papillary lesions or those associated with atypia require surgical excision because histologic underestimation occurs at a frequency similar to that in other atypical lesions undergoing core needle biopsy.     

MR-guided stereotactic breast biopsy: technical aspects and preliminary results

AIM: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of cytologic and microhistologic breast biopsy using a MR imaging-guided stereotactic system with MR-compatible non-magnetic needles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2001 and September 2002, cytologic and microhistologic sampling of 14 lesions (12 patients) was performed in our radiology department using a commercially available MR-guided stereotactic device. MR-compatible non-magnetic needles or mixed kit (non-magnetic coaxial needle + conventional ferromagnetic needle) were used. Of the 12 patients examined, 2 were undergoing MR examination because of genetic/familial risk, 4 during post-operative follow-up and the remaining 6 for contradictory mammographic and sonographic findings. Ten of the 14 lesions were visible on MR alone. The mean lesion diameter was 12 mm (range 5-30 mm). RESULTS: The procedure was relatively simple and feasible. The procedure took 45 minutes on average. The cytologic samples were adequate in 4/14 cases (29%). The diagnosis was absence of malignant cells in one case, ductal carcinoma in one case and suspected carcinoma in two cases. The cytologic diagnosis was confirmed by core biopsy, and by post-operative histology in the malignant lesions. The remaining 10/14 (71%) cytologic samples were inadequate for diagnosis. All the microhistologic samples (100%) were considered sufficient for diagnosis and yielded diagnosis of benignity in 9/14 (60%) lesions and malignancy in 5/14 (40%). Two patients with benign diagnosis underwent surgery, which confirmed the diagnosis. The remaining seven patients were evaluated by follow-up MRI; the first follow-up at 3 months showed no significant changes. Post-operative histology of the 5 lesions with malignant microhistologic diagnosis confirmed the nature of the lesions. CONCLUSIONS: MR-guided stereotactic biopsy is a simple, fast and safe procedure comparable to the interventional breast procedures performed under mammography and ultrasound guidance. The stereotactic device used ensures correct positioning of the needle into the lesion. The new dedicated non-magnetic needles and the mixed kit provide quantitatively and qualitatively adequate tissue for the histologic analysis. On the basis of our initial experience, we conclude that the procedure is feasible and accurate and can therefore be recommended for routine clinical use.     

Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: persistent underestimation of disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS: Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p = .13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION: The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.     

Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: comparison of breast biopsy methods.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the usefulness of, and cost of diagnosing with, different breast biopsy methods for women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy underwent diagnostic biopsy. Of these, 89 women had stereotactic biopsy with a 14-gauge automated needle (n = 25), 14-gauge vacuum-assisted probe (n = 17), or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted probe (n = 47); and 50 women had diagnostic surgical biopsy. Medical records were reviewed. Cost savings for stereotactic biopsy were calculated using Medicare data. RESULTS: The median number of operations was one for women who had stereotactic biopsy versus two for women who had diagnostic surgical biopsy. The likelihood of undergoing a single operation was significantly greater for women who had stereotactic rather than surgical biopsy, among all women (61/89 [68.5%] vs. 19/50 [38.0%], p < 0.001) and among women treated for breast cancer (55/77 [71.4%] vs. 6/37 [16.2%], p = 0.0000001). Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, as compared with 14-gauge automated core or 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, was significantly more likely to spare a surgical procedure (36/47 [76.6%] vs. 16/42 [38.1%], p = 0.0005). Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy resulted in the greatest cost reduction, yielding savings of $315 per case compared with diagnostic surgical biopsy; for women with solitary lesions, stereotactic 11-gauge biopsy decreased the cost of diagnosis by 22.2% ($334/$1502). CONCLUSION: For women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy, the use of stereotactic rather than surgical biopsy decreases the number of operations. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, as compared with 14-gauge automated core or 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, is significantly more likely to spare a surgical procedure and has the highest cost savings.     

Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US)-guided 14 G core needle breast biopsy in non-palpable suspicious breast lesions.

Material and Methods: From August 1997 to April 2001, 198 patients with 204 suspicious non-palpable breast lesions underwent US-guided large core needle biopsy. Biopsies were performed with a free-hand technique using US equipment with a 7.5 MHz linear-array transducer; a minimum of three cores were obtained from each lesion. Pathological findings in US-guided core biopsy were correlated to findings in subsequent surgery or long-term (more than 2 years) imaging follow-up.

Results: Among the 204 non-palpable breast lesions for which histopathological findings were obtained by US-guided core biopsy, 118 were malignant (114 carcinoma, 2 metastasis, 1 lymphoma, and 1 malignant phyllodes tumor) and 86 were benign (4 carcinoma and 82 benign lesions confirmed at surgery or after at least 2 years of follow-up). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for diagnosis of malignancy in our series were 97%, 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. Diagnostic yield with 1, 2, 3, and 4 specimens per lesion was 73.5%, 88%, 94%, and 97.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: US-guided core needle biopsy is a sensitive percutaneous biopsy method for diagnosing non-palpable breast lesions. To achieve a high diagnostic yield, a minimum number of three cores per lesion is advisable.     

Percutaneous vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy with upright stereotactic equipment. Indications,limitations and results

Purpose:
To assess the usefulness of stereotactic vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy (VCBB) performed using a stereotactic add-on device and film-screen technology with the patient in an upright seated position. Material and Methods:
We reviewed a series of 129 women with non-palpable mammographic abnormalities who required stereotactic VCBB from December 1999 to November 2000. Twenty-seven (20.9%) cases were excluded due to difficulties in keeping the correct position during the procedure, while the other 102 (79.1%) underwent successful VCBB. Patients with lesions consisting of either atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ were considered for excisional biopsy. Patients with either ductal carcinoma in situ or infiltrating breast cancer were referred for definitive surgery. The results of stereotactic VCBB were correlated to the subsequent surgical histology. Results:
Stereotactic VCBB was interrupted because of bleeding in 1 case and vasovagal reaction in 5 cases. Two haematomas occurred after the procedure. Overall underestimation rate was 10.5%. No new lesions were discovered after a mean follow-up of 18.7 months. Conclusion:
Stereotactic VCBB performed using a standard add-on device with the patient in an upright seated position and analog technology is feasible in about 80% of cases, has a low complication rate, is not significantly time-consuming, and can offer the same accuracy as dedicated prone equipment.     

Comparison of stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in 522 non-palpable breast lesions

Purpose: 
To compare the accuracy of stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytologies (S-FNAC) and stereotactic core needle biopsies (S-CNB) in non-palpable breast lesions. Material and Methods: 
Between May 1993 and December 2000, 696 patients with mammographically detected lesions were biopsied both with S-FNAC and S-CNB. S-FNAC was performed with spinal needle 22- or 20-gauge and S-CNB with an automated 14-gauge gun. Results: 
Of the 696 patients, 522 (75%) underwent breast surgery with postoperative histopathology. In all, 448 of these 522 women (86%) had malignant and 74 (14%) had benign lesions. S-FNAC revealed cancer in 254 (57%) and probable cancer in 48 (11%) (sensitivity 68%, specificity 99.6%) and S-CNB revealed cancer in 388 (87%) and probable cancer in 18 (4%) (sensitivity 90%, specificity 98.8%) of these 448 patients. Conclusion: 
S-CNB was more accurate than S-FNAC in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer.