颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定与标准椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学比较

目的 比较颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定和标准椎弓根螺钉固定的拔出强度.方法 取10具新鲜尸体颈椎标本(C_3～T_1),游离成三个颈椎运动节段(C_(3,4),C_(5,6),C_7T_1).在椎体两侧随机进行经关节椎弓根螺钉固定或标准椎弓根螺钉固定,置入直径3.5 mm皮质骨螺钉.经关节椎弓根螺钉固定以上位椎骨侧块外下象限中点为进钉点,在直视椎弓根下,螺钉在冠状面内倾约45°、矢状面尾倾约50°.由上位椎骨下关节突经关节突关节、下位椎骨的椎弓根,进入下位椎骨的椎体内.标准椎弓根螺钉固定以侧块外上象限中点为进钉点,在直视椎弓根下,螺钉方向参考CT测量结果 ,尽量与椎弓根倾斜角度保持一致,在横断面上内倾约45°、矢状面上螺钉指向椎体的上1/3.在生物力学试验机上行拔出强度试验,比较两种螺钉固定的最大轴向拔出力.结果 颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定平均最大轴向拨出力为(694±42)N,标准椎弓根螺钉固定为(670±36)N,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 颈椎后路经关节椎弓根螺钉固定的拔出强度大干标准椎弓根螺钉固定,从生物力学强度方面考虑经关节椎弓根螺钉固定可以作为标准椎弓根螺钉固定的一种补充方法.     

Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison

The authors directly the compared biomechanical pullout strength of screws placed in the cervical lateral masses to that of screws placed across the facet joints. Posterior cervical fixation with lateral mass plates is an accepted adjunctive technique for cervical spine fusions. Altered anatomy resulting from congenital malformation, tumor, trauma, infection, or failed lateral mass fixation may limit traditional screw placement options. Transfacet screw placement, which has been studied extensively in the lumbar spine, may offer an alternative when posterior cervical fusion is required. Ten fresh human cadaveric cervical spines (postmortem age range, 69 to 91 years) were harvested. On one side, transfacet screws were placed at the C3-4, C5-6, and C7-T1 levels. On the other side, lateral mass screws were placed at the C3, C5, and C7 levels. The screw insertion technique at each level was randomized for right or left. After screw placement, each set of vertebral bodies were dissected and mounted in a custom jig for axial pullout testing using a servohydraulic testing machine. The load-displacement curves were obtained for each screw pullout. The mean pullout strength for the screws placed across the facets was 467 N (range, 192 to 1,176 N). This compares with 360 N (range, 194 to 750 N) for the lateral mass screws (p = 0.008). At each level, transfacet screws exhibited greater pullout resistance compared with the lateral mass placement, but the difference was most pronounced at the C7-T1 level (lateral mass = 373 N, transfacet = 539 N, p = 0.042). Cervical transfacet screw placement provides pullout resistance that is comparable to, if not greater than, lateral mass placement. This type of placement, although technically difficult, may be an alternative to lateral mass screws in cases with unusual anatomy, stripped screws, or when additional intermediate points of fixation are desired.     

Posterior cervical lateral mass screw fixation: analysis of 1026 consecutive screws in 143 patients

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the results and complications of 1026 consecutive lateral mass screws inserted in 143 patients by a single surgeon. METHODS: Over a 50-month period, a total of 1026 lateral mass screws were placed in 143 patients ages 12-96 years (56 females and 87 males), with these records retrospectively reviewed. Screw position was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scanning postoperatively, with screw positions assessed for facet, foraminal, or foramen transversarium violation. RESULTS: All screws were placed by a modification of the Anderson technique, but 20 screws were converted to Roy-Camille trajectories because of screw pullout. No patients experienced neural injury or vertebral artery injury as a result of screw placement. Three patients had screw pullouts using the Axis system, which did not require reoperation. Most patients had 14-mm screws placed. Postoperative CT scanning showed no compromise of the foramen transversarium or neural foramen. A total of 94 C7 lateral mass screws were placed without the need for pedicle screws at this level. Forty-four cases were performed with a screw/plate construct with the remainder performed using a polyaxial screw/rod construct. One patient had a symptomatic adjacent-level disc herniation that required surgical intervention. One patient required extension of laminectomy for residual compression. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral mass screw fixation is a safe and effective stabilization technique. This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of lateral mass cannulation for a range of cervical pathologies with the largest reported series of consecutive lateral mass screws in the literature. In most cases of subaxial disease, nonconstrained plate/screw systems provide a reasonable alternative to polyaxial screw/rod constructs. Most patients can be fixated with 14-mm length x 3.5-mm diameter screws. The C7 lateral mass can be drilled with an adjusted trajectory.     

管道疏通法行颈椎弓根螺钉置入的研究

目的：通过解剖学测量及临床应用探讨“管道疏通法”（dredging pipe method,DPM)对提高颈椎弓根螺钉置入的成功率、安全性及可操作性方面的应用价值。方法：（1）颈椎骨测量：成人C3－C7干燥骨42套，共210块椎骨，在实体及CT片上，测量椎骨的相关参数；92）临床应用：颈椎失稳症患者32例，术前X线、CT测量，参照标本及患者影像测量数据和管道疏通器自动寻迹的原理，个体化设计各椎节的置钉方案。在直视下显露椎弓根管口及其管腔，确定置钉方向和位置，扩孔攻丝置钉。术后观察对比相应指标，评价置钉的位置、方向。结果：91）与DPM相关的国人颈椎实体测量数据与CT测量数据比较无显著性差异（P＞0．05）；6．67％（28／42）椎弓根的宽度小于4mm;(2)32例患者共置入颈椎弓根钉146枚，术后CT复查96枚钉，其中5枚螺钉穿破椎弓根骨皮质，成功率94．8％。未出现神经血管损伤病例。结论：（1）术前影像学测量结果可人为个体化设计手术方案的重要依据，采用DPM置钉技术实施经颈椎弓根钉内固定手术，具有直视下操作、置钉准备率高、可操作性强等特点；（2）解剖学测量表明，极少部分人（6．67％）的C3－C7的椎弓根宽度不适宜做椎弓根钉内固定。     

Biomechanical comparison of a novel percutaneous transfacet device and a traditional posterior system for single level fusion

Posterior spinal fusions are indicated for a variety of spinal disorders. Transfacet fixation minimizes soft tissue disruption and preserves the adjacent facet joint. This technique is uncommon due to concerns with biomechanical stability and proper implant placement. For these reasons, a length adjustable implant may obviate the clinical concerns but necessitates biomechanical study. This study evaluated the in vitro biomechanical stability between a novel transfacet fixation device compared with standard pedicle screws during cyclic physiologic loading in a human cadaveric model. Cadaveric L4-L5 lumbar motion segments from 16 human spines were tested in cyclic flexion/extension, lateral bending, and torsion after insertion of either transfacet fixation devices or 5.5 mm pedicle screw instrumentation. A load cell was used to measure the compressive forces on the anterior column during testing. Motion segment stiffness and anterior column compression were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance (P<0.05). The transfacet device demonstrated a statistically similar stiffness when compared with the pedicle screw system for each test direction. For anterior column loading during physiologic testing, there were no biomechanical differences between stabilization systems. Percutaneous transfacet fixation is an attractive surgical option for single-level spinal fusions. A biomechanical evaluation of a novel device for this application demonstrated similar stability to a pedicle screw system. The length adjustability of the device may alleviate concerns for precise device placement and the biomechanical stability may produce similar rates and quality of posterior spinal fusions.     

Lower cervical spine injury treated with lateral mass plates and pedicle screws through posterior approach

Theincidenceofspinalinjuryislessinthelowercervicalsegments(C6 C7)thanintheC3 C6segments.Operationthroughanteriorapproachiscommonlyusedfortheseinjures,butfewerreportsofthelowercervicalspineandspinalcordinjurytreated withcervicallateralmassplatesandT1pedicl…     

Laminar screw fixation of the axis

OBJECT: Laminar fixation of the axis with crossing bilateral screws has been shown to provide rigid fixation with a theoretically decreased risk of vertebral artery damage compared with C1-2 transarticular screw fixation and C-2 pedicle screw fixation. Some studies, however, have shown restricted rigidity of such screws compared with C-2 pedicle screws, and others note that anatomical variability exists within the posterior elements of the axis that may have an impact on successful placement. To elucidate the clinical impact of such screws, the authors report their experience in placing C-2 laminar screws in adult patients over a 2-year period, with emphasis on clinical outcome and technical placement. METHODS: Sixteen adult patients with cervical instability underwent posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures at our institution with constructs involving C-2 laminar screws. Eleven patients were men and 5 were women, and they ranged in age from 28 to 84 years (mean 57 years). The reasons for fusion were degenerative disease (9 patients) and treatment of trauma (7 patients). In 14 patients (87.5%) standard translaminar screws were placed, and in 2 (12.5%) an ipsilateral trajectory was used. All patients underwent preoperative radiological evaluation of the cervical spine, including computed tomography scanning with multiplanar reconstruction to assess the posterior anatomy of C-2. Anatomical restrictions for placement of standard translaminar screws included a deeply furrowed spinous process and/or an underdeveloped midline posterior ring of the axis. In these cases, screws were placed into the corresponding lamina from the ipsilateral side, allowing bilateral screws to be oriented in a more parallel, as opposed to perpendicular, plane. All patients were followed for >2 years to record rates of fusion, instrumentation failure, and other complications. RESULTS: Thirty-two screws were placed without neurological or vascular complications. The mean follow-up duration was 27.3 months. Complications included 2 revisions, one for pseudarthrosis and the other for screw pullout, and 3 postoperative infections. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of laminar screws into the axis from the standard crossing approach or via an ipsilateral trajectory may allow a safe, effective, and durable means of including the axis in posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures.     

胸椎经关节突关节椎弓根螺钉固定的可行性研究

 目的明确胸椎后路经关节突关节椎弓根螺钉固定的解剖学可行性和技术参数.为临床应用提供参考。方法取 20具胸椎标本.仔细解剖胸椎的后侧和前侧方.以清楚地暴露胸椎椎板和椎弓根。以椎板下缘向上、外缘向内各 7 mm为进钉点.在 T_1.2、T_5.6、T_9.10直视下置入经关节突关节椎弓根螺钉.通过直接的置钉和 CT重建.观察胸椎后路经关节突关节椎弓根螺钉实际置钉的可行性.测量经关节突关节椎弓根螺钉内固定进钉角度和钉道长度。结果所有胸椎后路经关节突关节椎弓根螺钉均由上位胸椎下关节突经关节突关节.进入下位胸椎的椎弓根.成功置入下位胸椎的椎体内。重建 CT测量发现螺钉在横断面的外倾角度为 2.1°±0.7°.在矢状面的尾倾角度为 41.4°±3.2°.在各节段间略有不同.但差异无统计学意义。平均的螺钉钉道长度为(40.6±4.9) mm.钉道长度由上胸椎向中、下胸椎呈逐渐增加趋势.差异有统计学意义(F=74.09, P<0.01)。结论胸椎后路经关节突关节椎弓根螺钉具有解剖学可行性.可以作为胸椎椎弓根螺钉固定的一种补充内固定方法.但置钉时要求较高的准确性。     

Minimally invasive lateral mass screws in the treatment of cervical facet dislocations: technical note

OBJECTIVE: The technique of lateral mass screw and rod or plate fixation is a major advancement in the posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine. This technique provides rigid three-dimensional fixation, restores the dorsal tension band, and provides highly effective stabilization in patients with many types of traumatic injuries. METHODS: Patient 1 was a 32-year-old man who had been in a motor vehicle accident. He presented with right C5 radiculopathy. X-ray findings included 45% anterolisthesis of C4 on C5, bilateral facet disruption, and right unilateral C4-C5 facet fracture and dislocation. The patient was placed in Gardner-Wells tongs, and the fracture was reduced with 25 pounds of traction. Patient 2 was a 56-year-old woman who had been in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in complete quadriplegia. Her initial imaging studies revealed a C3-C4 right unilateral facet fracture with subluxation. She was placed in traction, and her neurological status was reassessed. The findings of her neurological examination revealed improvement: she was found to have Brown-Séquard syndrome. Patient 3 was a 33-year-old man who was involved in a diving accident that resulted in bilaterally jumped facets at C3-C4. The patient was neurologically intact, and attempts at closed reduction were not successful. RESULTS: Patients 1 and 2 underwent anterior cervical discectomy with iliac crest autograft fusion and plating. They were then placed in the prone position, and a dilator tubular retractor system was used to access the facet joint at the level of interest. The facet joints were then denuded and packed with autograft. Lateral mass screws were then placed by means of the Magerl technique, and a rod was used to connect the top-loading screws. Patient 3 underwent posterior surgery that included only removal of the superior facet, intraoperative reduction, and bilateral lateral mass screw and rod placement. CONCLUSION: This technical note describes the successful placement of lateral mass screw and rod constructs with the use of a minimally invasive approach by means of a tubular dilator retractor system. This approach preserves the integrity of the muscles and ligaments that maintain the posterior tension band of the cervical spine.     

Preliminary experience with a novel facet-based lateral mass drill guide for the placement of lateral mass screws compared to freehand technique: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLateral mass screw fixation is the standard for posterior subaxial cervical fixation. Several freehand surgical techniques for placing lateral mass screws have been described which rely on anatomical landmarks and surgeon mastery of the technique to safely place screws. The accuracy of these freehand techniques is inherently variable and can be influenced by a surgeon's level of clinical experience. A novel technique was developed that utilizes the plane of the facet joint to create lateral mass screw pilot holes parallel with the joint line to improve the safety and accuracy of lateral mass screw placement regardless of experience.PURPOSETo assess the safety and accuracy of lateral mass screw placement using a novel lateral mass drill guide instrument (LM Guide), compared to standard freehand technique.STUDY DESIGNRandomized cadaveric study utilizing multiple surgeon evaluators to compare the safety and accuracy of guided cervical lateral mass placement compared to traditional freehand techniques.MATERIALS AND METHODSLateral mass screws were placed from C3 to C7 in 20 cadaver specimens by 8 spine surgeons of varying levels of clinical experience (4 attendings, 4 fellows). Screws were placed bilaterally using standard anatomic landmarks (“freehand”) randomly allocated on one side and using the LM Guide on the other. Cadaveric specimens were imaged with high-resolution CT to assess screw placement. Zone grading for safety was conducted based on screw tip position and clinical severity of screw breach was based on proximity to surrounding neurovascular anatomy. Screws were graded as safe, at-risk, or critical, with at-risk and critical screws considered malpositioned. To assess the accuracy of screw trajectory placed using the LM Guide compared to freehand, sagittal screw angle was measured and compared to an “ideal” screw path parallel to the facet joint line. Freehand and LM Guide groups were compared using Pearson's chi-square correlation.RESULTSScrew placement using the LM guide yielded a significantly lower rate of screw malpositioning, with 7 of 91 (7.7%) compared with 18 of 99 (18.2%) screws placed in the At-Risk or Critical Zones, p<.05. Of the 91 screws inserted using the LM Guide, 84 (92.3%) were in the Safe Zone, 7 (7.7%) were At-Risk, and 0 were in Critical zones. There was no incidence of neural or transverse foramen breaches with the LM Guide. In comparison, for the 99 screws inserted freehand, 81 (81.8%) were Safe, 14 (14.1%) were At-Risk, and 4 (4.1%) were in Critical zones. The 4 Critical zone freehand screw breaches included 1 neural foramen breach, 2 transverse foramen breaches, and 1 facet breach. The LM Guide also resulted in higher accuracy of screw trajectory, as indicated by a significant reduction in sagittal screw angle compared with freehand, p<.01. Notably, in the less-experienced surgeon cohort, the LM Guide significantly reduced the sagittal screw angle and resulted in no critical screw breaches compared to 3 critical breaches with freehand technique suggesting there might be a benefit in decreasing the learning curve associated with lateral mass screw placement.CONCLUSIONSLateral mass screw placement with a novel LM Guide that uses the facet joint to control screw trajectory improved the accuracy and reproducibility of screw placement with a significant reduction in screw breach rate and sagittal screw angle compared to freehand techniques regardless of surgeon experience level.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEThe inherent variability of freehand lateral mass screw placement can increase the risk of clinical complications associated with screw malpositioning. The technique presented in this cadaveric study may be a viable alternative to standard freehand technique that can improve the overall safety of lateral mass screw placement.     

Inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance. Is it safe?

Several studies have looked at accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopy, image guidance, and anatomical landmarks. To our knowledge the upper thoracic spine (T1–T6) has not been specifically studied in the context of screw insertion and placement accuracy without the use of either image guidance or fluoroscopy. Our objective was to study the accuracy of upper thoracic screw placement without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance, and report on implant related complications. A single surgeon inserted 60 screws in 13 consecutive non-scoliotic spine patients. These were the first 60 screws placed in the high thoracic spine in our institution. The most common diagnosis in our patient population was trauma. All screws were inserted using a modified Roy-Camille technique. Post-operative axial computed tomography (CT) images were obtained for each patient and analyzed by an independent senior radiologist for placement accuracy. Implant related complications were prospectively noted. No pedicle screw misplacement was found in 61.5% of the patients. In the remaining 38.5% of patients some misplacements were noted. Fifty-three screws out of the total 60 implanted were placed correctly within all the pedicle margins. The overall pedicle screw placement accuracy was 88.3% using our modified Roy-Camille technique. Five medial and two lateral violations were noted in the seven misplaced screws. One of the seven misplaced screws was considered to be questionable in terms of pedicle perforation. No implant related complications were noted. We found that inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine based solely on anatomical landmarks was safe with an accuracy comparable to that of published studies using image-guided navigation at the thoracic level.     

Translaminar screws of the axis—an alternative technique for rigid screw fixation in upper cervical spine instability

C2 pedicle screws or transarticular atlantoaxial screws are technically demanding and carry an increased risk of vertebral artery injury. In up to 20% of cases, pedicle and transarticular screw placement is not possible due to a high-riding vertebral artery or very small C2 pedicles in addition to other anatomical variations. Translaminar screws have been reported to rigidly capture posterior elements of C2 and therefore appear to be a suitable alternative. We present our first experiences and clinical results with this new method in two neurosurgical spine centers. Twenty-seven adult patients were treated between 2007 and 2010 in two neurosurgical spine departments with C2 translaminar screw fixation for upper cervical spine instability of various origins (e.g., trauma, tumor, dens pseudarthrosis). Eight patients were men and 19 were women. Mean age was 68.9 years. In most cases, translaminar screws were used because of contraindications for pedicle or transarticular screws as a salvage technique. All patients were clinically assessed and had CT scans postoperatively to verify correct screw placement. Follow-up was performed with reexamination on an ambulatory basis. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months for all patients. In 27 patients, 52 translaminar screws were placed. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, we identified four screw malpositions using a new accuracy grading scale. One screw had to be revised because of violation of the spinal canal >4 mm. None of the patients had additional neurological deficits postoperatively, and all showed stable cervical conditions at follow-up. Two patients died due to causes not associated with the stabilization technique. The fusion rate for patients with C1/C2 fixation is 92.9%. Translaminar screws can be used at least as an additional technique for cases of upper cervical spine instability when pedicle screw placement is contraindicated or not possible. The current data suggest comparable biomechanical stability and fusion rates of translaminar screws to other well-known posterior fixation procedures. In addition, translaminar screw placement is technically less demanding and reduces the risk of vertebral artery injury.     

Prospective evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopic imaging

BACKGROUND: In this prospective 18-month study, 29 patients underwent posterior thoracic instrumentation with placement of 209 transpedicular screws guided by intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging and anatomic landmarks. We assessed the safety, accuracy, complications, and early stability of this technique. METHODS: Pedicle and pedicle-rib units were measured, and screw cortical penetrations were graded on anatomy and depth of penetration. All 29 patients underwent preoperative computed tomographic (CT) imaging, and 28 underwent postoperative CT imaging (199/209 screws). RESULTS: From T2 to T12, screw diameters were >or=5 mm with mean medial screw angulation measuring 20-25 degree. Of the 209 screws placed from T1 to T12, 111 had diameters greater than or equal to the pedicle width. From T3 to T9, the mean diameter of the pedicle screws exceeded the mean pedicle width. Lateral pedicle wall penetration occurred significantly more often than superior, inferior, and medial pedicle wall penetrations and anterolateral vertebral body penetration. Five of six high-risk screw penetrations occurred in one patient when intraoperative technique was compromised. We observed no new postoperative neurologic deficits, visceral injuries, or pedicle screw instrumentation failures. The three high-risk anterolateral vertebral body penetrations at T1 and T2 were associated with a significantly decreased mean screw transverse angle; the three high-risk medial pedicle wall penetrations occurring from T3 to T9 were associated with a significantly increased mean screw transverse angle. Among all 26 patients available at postoperative follow-up (mean 11.9 months), the mean loss of kyphosis correction was 2.0 degree. CONCLUSIONS: Guided by intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging and anatomic landmarks, thoracic pedicle screws can be placed safely. Early clinical follow-up reveals excellent results with minimal loss of kyphosis correction.     

非影像监视下行脊柱侧凸胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的临床应用

目的:探讨脊柱侧凸胸椎椎弓根螺钉非影像监视下徒手置入的方法及可行性。方法:57例脊柱侧凸患者行后路椎弓根螺钉系统矫形手术,徒手法置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉。术后常规拍摄脊柱全长X线片,随机选取10例患者行CT扫描观察,了解螺钉置入的准确性。结果:共置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉362枚。术后X线片观察到10枚螺钉偏外,4枚螺钉偏下,其中2枚螺钉引起轻微肋间神经痛,3周后完全缓解。CT观察47枚螺钉有2枚螺钉导致椎弓根内壁膨胀内移,没有相应神经症状。主弯Cobb角术前平均60.4°(32°～121°),术后平均18.3°(1°～70°),平均矫正率71.9%(38.1%～98.0%)。结论:徒手法置入脊柱侧凸胸椎椎弓根螺钉是可行的。     

Iso-C 3D导航系统下椎弓根钉内固定治疗颈椎骨折脱位

[目的]探讨在Iso-C 3D导航系统下行椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗颈椎骨折、脱位的临床意义。[方法]在Iso-C 3D导航系统下,应用椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗颈椎骨折、脱位共31例,观察临床疗效及置钉的准确性。[结果]本组31例中,共置入136枚椎弓根螺钉。术后X线片显示,颈椎骨折脱位复位均满意,颈椎生理曲度恢复良好。术后CT显示,136枚椎弓根螺钉中,有6枚螺钉穿破椎弓根,穿透皮质率4.4%,但均未造成脊髓、神经、血管压迫等。经随访,X线显示所有病例融合区均骨性愈合,无1例出现断钉及内置物松动现象。合并脊髓损伤的患者,术后神经功能均有不同程度的恢复。[结论]椎弓根螺钉技术稳定性良好,具有优越的生物力学性能,为颈椎骨折脱位行后路内固定提供了一种安全有效的方法,在Iso-C 3D导航下行颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定手术,能显著提高椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性和安全性。     

The “TFP” Fusion Technique for Posterior 360° Lumbar Fusion: a Combination of Open Decompression,Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion,and Facet Fusion with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation

Because degenerative spondylolithesis is prevalent in the elderly with associated osteoporosis, the rate of failure of pedicle screws is high; this leads to pseudoarthrosis and potentially requires reoperation. The burden of recurrent symptoms and reoperation is sufficiently significant to warrant prevention. We here describe a hybrid technique that involves a combination of a unilateral approach to bilateral decompression via a midline incision, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), contralateral facet fusion, and percutaneously placed pedicle screws without compromising operative time and visualization. This approach is familiar to spine surgeons, adheres to the basic principles of minimally invasive spine surgery technique, minimizes dural and neural injury because of the unilateral TLIF approach, and provides a superior fusion construct because of facet fusion. In this procedure, patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis with moderate‐severe canal/foraminal stenosis undergo a midline unilateral TLIF and contralateral facet fusion with closure of the midline incision. Percutaneous pedicle screws are inserted under stereotactic guidance with reduction of the deformity using a pedicle screws construct. Rods are inserted percutaneously to link the pedicle screws. Image intensification is used to confirmed satisfactory screw placement and reduction of the spondylolisthesis.     

Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic spine deformity correction. METHODS: One hundred twelve pedicle screws were surgically placed in 25 patients with degenerative, posttraumatic, and Scheuermann kyphosis and idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis. Screw position was evaluated using intraoperative and postoperative radiographs and thin-slice computed tomography. RESULTS: Of the total 112 thoracic pedicle screws that were inserted, 98 screws (87.5%) were fully contained within the cortical boundaries of the pedicle. When comparing proximal screws (T1-T8) with distal screws (T9-T12) and convex placed screws with concave ones, a statistically significant difference in screw placement was evident (P < 0.05). More misplaced screws were seen proximally and on the concave side. Of the 14 malpositioned screws, 2 (1.8%) demonstrated aortic abutment. There were no neurologic deficits, vascular injuries, or mechanical failures recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of thoracic pedicle screws is both feasible and safe.     

Efficacy of translaminar facet screw fixation in circumferential interbody fusions as compared to pedicle screw fixation

OBJECTIVES: Posterior lumbar fixation with translaminar facet screws is a minimally invasive technique with good success rates. Long-term follow-ups show reduced reoperation rates, a decrease in pain scores, and few complications compared with pedicle screw fixation devices. The purpose of this study was to compare the reoperation rate of translaminar facet screw fixation with that of pedicle screw fixation in 360 degrees anterior and posterior fusions for incapacitating low back pain due to lumbar disc degeneration unresponsive to at least 6 months of aggressive nonoperative treatment. METHODS: One hundred five patients underwent a combined circumferential lumbar fusion with posterior fixation for discogenic pain by one surgeon between August 1993 and February 2003. Seventeen patients were excluded from the study owing to their preoperative etiology for fusion or a prior instrumented posterior fusion. A retrospective chart review was done on all 88 remaining patients. Patients were followed in the office, by phone, or by mail to obtain functional outcome measures. Any subsequent operations by this surgeon or another were recorded. The comparison focused on the rate of reoperation on the region of posterior lumbar fixation. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients have had at least a 2-year follow-up. Twenty-four patients had a posterior fusion with pedicle screws, and 43 had translaminar facet screw fixation. Nine patients of the pedicle screw population (37.5%) had a reoperation to remove their instrumentation. Two patients of the translaminar facet screw population (4.7%) had reoperations on their lumbar spine. There was a significant association between posterior instrumentation type and reoperation (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The success of translaminar facet screws in circumferential fusions is justified.     

Radiographic verification of pedicle screw pilot hole placement using Kirshner wires versus beaded wires

STUDY DESIGN: Kappa statistics were used to compare the accuracy of two different techniques for verifying pedicle screw pilot hole placement in cadaveric vertebrae. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinicians radiographically detect misplaced pedicle screw holes with greater sensitivity and specificity when beaded wires rather than straight Kirschner wires are used. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws commonly are used in orthopedic surgery to obtain and maintain spinal stability. Pedicle screws are reportedly misplaced at a rate of 20% to 40%. Radiographic verification is commonly used to place pedicle screw pilot holes, but this technique is known to be less than 100% accurate. Computer-assisted techniques may allow more accurate screw placement, but these techniques require expensive equipment. METHODS: Pedicle screw pilot holes were drilled into 12 human lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. Some of the holes were misplaced deliberately so that they violated the pedicle walls. Lateral and posteroanterior radiographs of the vertebrae were evaluated by 13 experienced orthopedic spine surgeons and 3 inexperienced observers. At different times, the observers were shown radiographs depicting Kirschner wires or beaded wires placed in the pilot holes. Observers indicated whether they thought the pedicle screw pilot hole violated the pedicle. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of using posteroanterior or lateral radiographs to detect misplaced pedicle screws were increased when beaded wires were placed in the pilot holes. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic evaluation of beaded wires placed in pedicle screw pilot holes can be both sensitive and specific for misplaced screws. The highest sensitivity and specificity were found using posteroanterior radiographs.     

Accuracy and safety of free-hand pedicle screw fixation in age less than 10 years

Background:

Pedicle screws are being used commonly in the treatment of various spinal disorders. However, use of pedicle screws in the pediatric population is not routinely recommended because of the risk of complications. The present study was to evaluate the safety of pedicle screws placed in children aged less than 10 years with spinal deformities and to determine the accuracy and complication (early and late) of pedicle screw placement using the postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty one patients (11 males and 20 females) who underwent 261 pedicle screw fixations (177 in thoracic vertebrae and 84 in lumbar vertebrae) for a variety of pediatric spinal deformities at a single institution were included in the study. The average age of patients was 7 years and 10 months. These patients underwent postoperative CT scan which was assessed by two independent observers (spine surgeons) not involved in the treatment.

Results:

Breach rate was 5.4% (14/261 screws) for all pedicles. Of the 177 screws placed in the thoracic spine, 13 (7.3%) had breached the pedicle, that is 92.7% of the screws were accurately placed within pedicles. Seven screws (4%) had breached the medial pedicle wall, 4 screws (2.3%) had breached the lateral pedicle wall and 2 screws (1.1%) had breached the superior or inferior pedicle wall respectively. Of the 84 screws placed in the lumbar spine, 83 (98.8%) screws were accurately placed within the pedicle. Only 1 screw (1.2%) was found to be laterally displaced. In addition, the breach rate was found to be 4.2% (11/261 screws) with respect to the vertebral bodies. No neurological, vascular or visceral complications were encountered.

Conclusions:

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in pedicles and vertebral bodies were 94.6% and 95.8% respectively and there was no complication related to screw placement noted until the last followup. These results suggest that free-hand pedicle screw fixation can be safely used in patients younger than 10 years to treat a variety of spinal disorders.