Meeting the needs of rural populations through interdisciplinary partnerships

This article describes the organization and outcomes of a Rural Health Outreach Initiative (RHOI) designed to increase collaboration between the medical education and health care delivery sectors to improve the quality of health care delivery and health outcomes in rural communities. Two inter-related partnership strategies were utilized in rural communities to address the health and social service needs of rural populations. The partnerships were created through the efforts of a rural health professions education program located in a community-based medical school. The two partnership models were implemented at the same time and target the same rural populations. Both strategies relied upon interdisciplinary collaborations to achieve their goals and outcomes. One strategy involved the creation of partnerships among rural medical students and the projects they initiate, using the model of community oriented primary care (COPC). The second strategy involved the establishment of partnerships by a variety of rural, community-based entities that resulted from a three-year Health Resources and Services Administration Rural Health Outreach grant that supported a "mini-grant" program. This article summarizes the process and results of these innovative collaborations that occurred at two levels: (1) between health and service institutions representing multiple disciplines and (2) between academic institutions and local communities. Specific attention is given to projects that resulted from the work of the partnerships that address the needs of older adults residing in the rural communities. The two strategies are compared and implications for the success of similar efforts are discussed.     

Integrating primary health care and mental health services--a successful rural linkage

The local delivery of human services is currently receiving national emphasis. The expectation is that community-based services shall be provided with a minimum of duplication and with maximum efficiency, achieved partly by interdisciplinary and interorganizational cooperation. This emphasis was appropriately facilitated in the mid-1970s through the availability of the Mental Health Initiative grants. The grants, initiated by the Bureau of Community Health Services in conjunction with the National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service, promoted the increased availability of mental health services through formal linkages between community mental health centers and primary health care programs. One such successful linkage was between a small primary health care center and a nonfederally funded, multicounty, mental health center in northwest Illinois. Initiated in September 1980, the services of the linkage project included direct clinical mental health services delivered at the primary health care center site, consultation and education activities, and the coordination of interagency services. The project patients differed from the general clients of the mental health center in demographic characteristics, source of referral, and diagnoses. The key elements in successful linkages and the achievement of goals are analyzed. The experience of the linkage project is relevant to the 1980s. The project was prematurely ended after 14 months. Reduction in Federal funds severely cut support for the primary health care center, and the depressed local economy could not match the withdrawn Federal funds.     

Rural health around the world: challenges and solutions

Despite the huge differences between developing and developed countries, access is the major issue in rural health around the world. Even in the countries where the majority of the population lives in rural areas, the resources are concentrated in the cities. All countries have difficulties with transport and communication, and they all face the challenge of shortages of doctors and other health professionals in rural and remote areas. Many rural people are caught in the poverty- ill health-low productivity downward spiral, particularly in developing countries. Since 1992, WONCA, the World Organization of Family Doctors, has developed a specific focus on rural health through the WONCA Working Party on Rural Practice. This Working Party has drawn national and international attention to major rural health issues through World Rural Health Conferences and WONCA Rural Policies. The World Health Organization (WHO) has broadened its focus beyond public health to partnership with family practice, initially through a landmark WHO-WONCA Invitational Conference in Canada. From this has developed the Memorandum of Agreement between WONCA and WHO which emphasizes the important role of family practitioners in primary health care and also includes the Rural Health Initiative. In April 2002, WHO and WONCA held a major WHO-WONCA Invitational Conference on Rural Health. This conference addressed the immense challenges for improving the health of people of rural and remote areas of the world and initiated a specific action plan: The Global Initiative on Rural Health. The "Health for All" vision for rural people is more likely to be achieved through joint concerted efforts of international and national bodies working together with doctors, nurses and other health workers in rural areas around the world.     

Evaluation of a primary health care program for the poor

This paper examines the success in implementing a major program involving a partnership between public and private providers to deliver primary health care services to the poor. In 1985, the 69th Texas Legislature passed the Primary Health Care Services Act, authorizing the Texas Department of Health to contract for or directly provide primary health care services in those parts of the state that are medically underserved and have large numbers of people in poverty. This paper evaluates the potential impact of the projects with respect to access and cost. The study revealed that the basic concept of allowing local public and private providers to develop projects reflecting their community's unique needs and resources was successful. The approach lead to a wide variety of different types of projects, but the basic goals and activities of the projects are consistent with the legislation. The evaluation identified three major program areas that could be improved: (1) patient monitoring and follow-up to ensure the accessibility of the priority primary care services, (2) the need for the development of projects in other high need areas of the state, and (3) greater efficiency in service delivery.Charles E. Begley, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, P.O. Box 20186, Houston, Texas 77225.Lu Ann Aday, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor at the School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.Roy McCandless is a Faculty Associate, Center for Health Policy Studies, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.The research on which this paper is based was supported by the Bureau of Dental and Chronic Disease Prevention, Texas Department of Health. The authors wish to acknowledge the substantial contributions of Margaret Frank, M.H.S. and Kiyoko Parrish, M.P.H., Faculty Associates with the Center for Health Policy Studies, in the development and conduct of this research.     

Positive programming

A data-driven approach to allocating federal resources for primary care systems in rural areas is presented. This approach was developed and implemented by the Public Health Service (PHS) when it undertook its Rural Health Initiative Program. Nationally available small-area data were used to identify priority counties and PHS regional office staffs were asked to take an active role in developing rural health system projects in these counties. This approach was adopted to avoid the problem of the many communities eligible for and in need of funds that do not get them because they lack the organization and knowledgeable personnel required to develop a project grant application. The paper defines and discusses the positive programming approach (believed to be the first attempt to allocate federal health service delivery resources actively on the basis of small-area data), discusses the present shortcomings of the approach (including data limitations), and presents the results of implementing the approach. In the first year, 23% of the priority counties and 13% of the nonpriority counties were served, while in the second year 39% of the priority counties and 17% of the nonpriority counties were served. The substantial increase in the percentage of priority counties served reflects the effectiveness of the positive programming effort.Dr. Rockoff was formerly Health Scientist Administrator at the National Center for Health Services Research and is now Program Analysis Officer at the Dept. of Energy; Mr. Gorin is Public Health Analyst at the Bureau of Community Health Services; and Dr. Kleinman is Special Assistant to the Director, Division of Analysis, National Center for Health Statistics. Reprint requests should be addressed to Publications and Information Branch, National Center for Health Services Research, 3700 East-West Highway Room 7-44, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782.     

Proposed Changes to Designations of Medically Underserved Populations and Health Professional Shortage Areas: Effects on Rural Areas

This paper reports an analysis of the proposed rule to combine medically underserved population (MUP) and health professional shortage area (HPSA) designations, as published by the Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) in the Federal Register on Sept. 1, 1998 (Department of Health and Human Services, 1998). The effects of the proposed rule overall and on rural communities were examined, particularly with respect to current whole county HPSA designations and eligibility for federal assistance programs. National, county-level estimates of primary care provider counts and other measures included in the proposed rule were used. Different primary care provider sources were compared; results were highly dependent on the data source and the inclusions of counts of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. The projections of losses from the proposed rule were higher than those of the BPHC, probably due to the use of different sources for provider counts. Overall, the authors projected that more than 50 percent of current whole-county HPSAs would lose designation using the proposed rule. The proportion of rural counties that lost designation was not significantly greater than the proportion of urban counties, but because there are many more rural counties, more de-designations were projected to occur in rural areas. The researchers also predicted that 58 percent of rural whole-county HPSAs with National Health Service Corps providers would lose their designation, but most rural whole-county HPSAs with Community and Migrant Health Centers or Rural Health Clinics retained their MUP designation using the proposed rule. The proposed rule likely has a larger effect on current designations than originally projected by the BPHC.     

Impact of federal primary health care policy in rural areas: empirical evidence from the literature.

This review examines the equity, efficiency and effectiveness of federal rural primary care policy as documented by the existing literature. The focus is on the Community Health Center and National Health Service Corps programs which have constituted the major components of the policy. The literature relating to the policy is limited in the number of studies available and in the quality of the research. The available evidence indicates that the policy is associated with an improvement in the distribution of health resources between rural and urban areas,and among rural areas.There is also partial evidence that the policy has been cost-efficient. For federally subsidized practices,the cost of delivering a similar quality of health care is shown to be up to 50 percent less in rural than in urban areas. Rural private practitioners, though, may be more cost-efficient than federally subsidized rural practitioners, at least under certain conditions which have yet to be fully delineated. Program effectiveness is the least well documented, but the literature does suggest that the policy has had a positive effect on the health status of rural populations. Substantially more research on the efficiency, and particular the effectiveness, of federal rural primary care policy is required for the development of a rational basis for the policy.     

Improving access to and outcomes from mental health care in rural Australia

OBJECTIVE: Rural Australians face particular difficulties in accessing mental health care. This paper explores whether 51 rural Access to Allied Psychological Services projects, funded under the Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care program, are improving such access, and, if so, whether this is translating to positive consumer outcomes. DESIGN AND METHOD: The paper draws on three data sources (a survey of models of service delivery, a minimum dataset and three case studies) to examine the operation and achievements of these projects, and makes comparisons with their 57 urban equivalents as relevant. RESULTS: Proportionally, uptake of the projects in rural areas has been higher than in urban areas: more GPs and allied health professionals are involved, and more consumers have received care. There is also evidence that the models of service delivery used in these projects have specifically been designed to resolve issues particular to rural areas, such as difficulties recruiting and retaining providers. The projects are being delivered at no or low cost to consumers, and are achieving positive outcomes as assessed by standardised measures. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the rural projects have the potential to improve access to mental health care for rural residents with depression and anxiety, by enabling GPs to refer them to allied health professionals. The findings are discussed with reference to recent reforms to mental health care delivery in Australia.     

National Rural Health Mission--a critical review

National Rural Health Mission is strategic framework to implement the National Health Policy 2002. The scheme of Accredited Social Health Activist is an improvement over the earlier Community Health Guide Scheme. Integration of various health and family welfare programmes will result in economy and allocation of resources as per needs of the districts. Decentralised planning with the involvement of Panchayati Raj Institutions is likely to make health as people's programme. Converging water supply, sanitation, hygiene and nutrition with health planning is a logical step. The proposal to strenthen institutions of primary health care and Community Health Centres as functional Rural Hospitals alongwith introduction of Indian Public Health Standards and accountability of public health institutions to the public is likely to revolutionise the status of health care in rural India.     

Enhancing rural economic development: crafting a health care revolving loan fund

Community development efforts in economically depressed rural areas are often hampered by poor access to health care. One barrier to rural provider availability is the difficulty of obtaining capital for rural health care infrastructure development. Commercial lending institutions are limited in their ability to respond to these needs due to traditional lending criteria--creditworthiness, equity, experience, management ability, and profits or cash flow. This paper describes a rural health care revolving loan fund crafted to address these needs for capital while addressing the goal of improving health care access in rural Arkansas. The Arkansas Rural Health Revolving Loan Fund is a model for other states interested in two processes that work synergistically: (1) increasing access to capital to strengthen the rural primary health care infrastructure and (2) making health care more economically viable by integrating the fund's efforts with those of other community development initiatives.     

我国基层卫生机构服务功能分析

基层卫生机构功能决定着基本卫生服务的供给。本文利用国家第四次卫生服务总调查以及专题调查资料,对城乡基层卫生机构服务开展情况进行了分析。根据经济社会发展水平、基层卫生机构服务能力和城乡居民需要解决的主要健康问题,本研究将基本卫生服务项目按照优先程度分为三个等级。约三分之一的城乡基层卫生机构尚不能提供最应优先开展的基本卫生服务;农村基层卫生机构服务能力与城市基层卫生机构相比更为薄弱,特别是村级卫生机构基本卫生服务能力需要加强;乡镇卫生院和社区卫生服务中心开展最优先项目的比例均不足70%;村卫生室和社区服务站开展最优先项目比例分别为62%和77%。影响基层卫生机构功能的主要因素为人员数量不足、人员能力不够、缺乏运转资金等。需要以基层卫生机构功能建设为核心,创新我国基本医疗卫生保健体系。     

Issues in rural health: access, hospitals, and reform

This overview discusses articles published in this issue of the Health Care Financing Review, entitled "Access to Health Care Services in Rural Areas: Delivery and Financing Issues." These articles focus on the following topics: rural hospitals (including closures, the impact of Federal grants, network development, and costs), managed care in rural areas, telemedicine, and the delivery of mental health services to rural Medicaid beneficiaries.     

Health care services for HIV-positive substance abusers in a rural setting: an innovative program

Agencies that deliver health care services to HIV-positive substance abusers living in rural areas of the United States face particular treatment challenges and barriers to care. Rural consumers of HIV/AIDS health care-related services identified long travel distances to medical facilities, lack of transportation, lack of availability of HIV-specific medical personnel, a shortage of mental health and substance abuse services, community stigma, and financial problems as leading barriers to access to care. This article discusses barriers to care for rural HIV-positive substance abusers, and challenges for rural health care providers. In addition, it presents a case study of Health Services Center, a model program that has devised innovative practices in the delivery of health care services to HIV-positive substance abusers in rural northeastern Alabama.     

Community perspectives on roles and responsibilities for strengthening primary health care in rural Ethiopia

Abstract Government-community partnerships are central to developing effective, sustainable models of primary health care in low-income countries; however, evidence about the nature of partnerships lacks the perspective of community members. Our objective was to characterise community perspectives regarding the respective roles and responsibilities of government and the community in efforts to strengthen primary health care in low-income settings. We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups (n=14 groups in each of seven primary health care units in Amhara and Oromia, Ethiopia, with a total of 140 participants) in the context of the Ethiopian Millennium Rural Initiative. Results indicated that community members defined important roles and responsibilities for both communities and governments. Community roles included promoting recommended health behaviours; influencing social norms regarding health; and contributing resources as feasible. Government roles included implementing oversight of health centres; providing human resources, infrastructure, equipment, medication and supplies; and demonstrating support for community health workers, who are seen as central to the rural health system. Renewed efforts in health system strengthening highlight the importance of community participation in initiatives to improve primary health care in rural settings. Community perspectives provide critical insights to defining, implementing and sustaining partnerships in these settings.     

Rural Health Care in Bolivia*

ABSTRACT: Eighty percent of Bolivians live in rural areas. However, because of a lack of resources and an urban / curative health sector orientation, rural primary health care services are woefully inadequate. Consequently, Bolivia has the worst health conditions of any of the Latin American countries. The broader factors which underlie Bolivia's poor health conditions, such as the low standard of living and impediments to socioeconomic development, are reviewed. Rural primary health programs are hampered by a lack of local support, overdependence on central and distant Ministry of Health supervisory staff, a lack of strong national political support for rural primary health care programs, the absence of public sector support for social programs, and a lack of appropriately trained health providers who are comfortable in the rural sociocultural mileu of community-oriented primary health care. The experience of Andean Rural Health Care is briefly described, and the potential contribution of private organizations working with local communities and with the Ministry of Health is addressed. The most viable option for improving rural primary health care in Bolivia is the census-based community-oriented approach.     

Community perspectives on roles and responsibilities for strengthening primary health care in rural Ethiopia

Abstract

Government–community partnerships are central to developing effective, sustainable models of primary health care in low-income countries; however, evidence about the nature of partnerships lacks the perspective of community members. Our objective was to characterise community perspectives regarding the respective roles and responsibilities of government and the community in efforts to strengthen primary health care in low-income settings. We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups (n=14 groups in each of seven primary health care units in Amhara and Oromia, Ethiopia, with a total of 140 participants) in the context of the Ethiopian Millennium Rural Initiative. Results indicated that community members defined important roles and responsibilities for both communities and governments. Community roles included promoting recommended health behaviours; influencing social norms regarding health; and contributing resources as feasible. Government roles included implementing oversight of health centres; providing human resources, infrastructure, equipment, medication and supplies; and demonstrating support for community health workers, who are seen as central to the rural health system. Renewed efforts in health system strengthening highlight the importance of community participation in initiatives to improve primary health care in rural settings. Community perspectives provide critical insights to defining, implementing and sustaining partnerships in these settings.     

Health Care Services for HIV-Positive Substance Abusers in a Rural Setting: An Innovative Program

ABSTRACT

Agencies that deliver health care services to HIV-positive substance abusers living in rural areas of the United States face particular treatment challenges and barriers to care. Rural consumers of HIV/AIDS health care–related services identified long travel distances to medical facilities, lack of transportation, lack of availability of HIV-specific medical personnel, a shortage of mental health and substance abuse services, community stigma, and financial problems as leading barriers to access to care. This article discusses barriers to care for rural HIV-positive substance abusers, and challenges for rural health care providers. In addition, it presents a case study of Health Services Center, a model program that has devised innovative practices in the delivery of health care services to HIV-positive substance abusers in rural northeastern Alabama.     

医改和城乡统筹背景下,加强社区卫生服务能力建设的思考

社区卫生服务是新医改和城乡统筹的关键环节,同时医改和城乡统筹也给社区卫生发展带来了很好的机遇.抓住机遇加强社区卫生服务能力建设,完善服务功能,使其有能力为广大居民提供"有效、经济、方便、综合、连续"的卫生服务,担当起城市公共卫生体系和基本医疗服务体系的网底角色,真正发挥起"守门人"的作用.     

Teaching community-oriented primary care (COPC): A practical approach

To improve education in community-oriented primary care (COPC) and to promote its practice in the community, the University of California's School of Public Health in Berkeley and School of Medicine in San Francisco are collaborating in an innovative program in cooperation with several federally-funded community clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area. The School of Public Health designed a COPC track for graduate public health students from various departments of the school who wished to work in community health care. The track includes a seminar given in the spring of the students' first year in which COPC theory is taught and teams of students working with a faculty advisor and a clinic preceptor design COPC projects for the primary care sites. These projects are then implemented in the summer and fall by students who elect to use this experience to satisfy their fieldwork requirement. This paper is a report of the first year's experience with this collaborative effort.Emilie H.S. Osborn, M.D., M.P.H. is Assistant Professor, Family and Community Medicine, University of California at San Francisco. Norman Hearst, M.D., M.P.H. is Assistant Clinical Professor, Clinical Epidemiology and Family and Community Medicine, University of California at San Francisco. Joyce C. Lashof, M.D., is Dean, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley. W. McFate Smith, M.D., M.P.H. is Director, Preventive Medicine Residency, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley.This project has been supported in part with Federal funds from the Bureau of Health Care Delivery and Assistance, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Public Health Service, under contract #240-84-0124. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services.     

Rural Primary Care Program Survival: An Analysis of Financial Variables

This study examines the effect of financial characteristics of rural primary care programs on the probability of their continuing as federally funded entities. A randomly selected national cohort of rural primary care programs (n = 162) was used to compare financial measures of programs that were continuing and those that were noncontinuing. Financial data were obtained from 1978-1987 Bureau Common Reporting Requirements (BCRR) forms submitted to the Bureau of Health Care Delivery and Assistance of the Department of Health and Human Services as part of the requirement to receive federal grant support for the programs. The results emphasize the importance of both outside funding and increased level of self-sufficiency in the continuation of rural primary care programs. Noncontinuing programs often suffer from both a lack of self-sufficiency and a lack of outside funding, mostly from federal sources. To a lesser extent, the number of patients also affects the program's chance of continuation. From a policy perspective, government intervention is both necessary and likely if rural primary care programs are to succeed and fulfill their mission of providing primary care for the medically underserved who are primarily poor, uninsured, and unable to pay.