Impact of bleach cleaning on the performance of dialyzers with polysulfone membranes processed for reuse using peracetic Acid

Dialyzer performance may change with reuse depending on whether or not the dialyzer is cleaned with bleach. Bleach is usually used in conjunction with formaldehyde as the germicide. Because few data are available for dialyzers cleaned with bleach and disinfected with peracetic acid, we examined dialyzer performance in a cross-over study of dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes reprocessed using bleach and peracetic acid or peracetic acid alone. Each dialyzer was used for a total of 16 treatments, or until it failed standard criteria for continued use. Urea, beta2-microglobulin, and albumin removal were determined during the first, second, seventh, and 16th use of each dialyzer. Urea removal did not differ between the two reprocessing methods and did not change with reuse. Overall, beta2-microglobulin removal remained unchanged in dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid alone, but tended to increase after the seventh use in dialyzers reprocessed with bleach and peracetic acid. Approximately 60% of beta2-microglobulin removal resulted from trapping of beta2-microglobulin at the dialyzer membrane. Albumin loss into the dialysate was clinically insignificant throughout the study with both reprocessing methods. These data show that the clearance of both small and large molecules by dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes is well maintained by reprocessing with peracetic acid and that additional cleaning with bleach has limited impact on performance.     

Dialyzer-dependent changes in solute and water permeability with bleach reprocessing

The effects of bleach reprocessing on the performance of high-flux dialyzers have not been comprehensively characterized. We compared the effects of automated bleach/formaldehyde reprocessing on solute and hydraulic permeability for cellulose triacetate (CT190) and polysulfone (F80B) dialyzers using an in vitro model. Dialyzers were studied after initial blood exposure (R0) and after 1 (R1), 5 (R5), 10 (R10), and 15 (R15) reuse cycles. Ultrafiltration coefficient (K(uf)), serial clearances, and/or sieving coefficients (SCs) of urea, creatinine, vancomycin, inulin, myoglobin, and albumin were determined. Urea, creatinine, and vancomycin clearances and SCs did not significantly differ from R0 to R15 with either dialyzer. Inulin clearances and SC also did not significantly change from R0 to R15 for the CT190. However, these same values for the F80B significantly increased (P < 0.05). The inulin clearance and SC values for the CT190 dialyzer were significantly higher than those for the F80B at all stages except R15. Myoglobin clearances significantly increased over 15 reuses for both dialyzers (P < 0.01). However, CT190 myoglobin clearances were significantly higher at all stages (R0 = 37.7 +/- 9.7; R15 = 52.5 +/- 8.8 mL/min) than the F80B (R0 = negligible; R15 = 41.3 +/- 16.5 mL/min; P < 0.01). Albumin pre- and postdialysis SCs significantly increased for both dialyzers (P < 0.01). K(uf) for R0 and R15 were 52.3 +/- 3.3 and 52.6 +/- 7.6 mL/h/mm Hg for CT190 (P = not significant) and 48.8 +/- 4.4 and 87.3 +/- 7.0 mL/h/mm Hg for F80B (P < 0.0001). We conclude that bleach reprocessing significantly increases larger solute and hydraulic permeability of high-flux cellulosic and polysulfone dialyzers. This effect is more pronounced for the polysulfone membrane. Until 10 reuses or greater, the removal of solutes greater than 1,500 d is significantly compromised with the polysulfone dialyzer used in this study.     

Dialyzer performance over prolonged reuse

Studies were performed in patients on maintenance hemodialysis to evaluate the role of prolonged dialyzer reuse in the management of end-stage renal disease. For this purpose the patients were dialyzed without interruption with the same hollow fiber dialyzers (GambroR 120M) reprocessed with the Lixivitron IIR equipment. The data obtained from in vivo clearances in sixteen patients demonstrate that membrane permeability to small solutes (urea, creatinine, phosphate) is maintained up to thirty dialyzer uses. In vitro studies confirmed this observation and established that clearances of larger solutes (vitamin B12) are also maintained over similar extensive dialyzer reuse. Hematological and blood gas studies were performed serially during dialysis in five additional patients. Although circulating leucocyte and neutrophil counts, hemoglobin concentration as well as arterial pH and partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide changed appropriately during dialysis, there was no observable difference from the first to the twentieth use of the same dialyzer. Thus, these results clearly demonstrate that prolonged dialyzer reuse in end-stage renal disease patients constitutes a stable form of renal replacement therapy provided adequate dialyzer reprocessing is applied.     

Effect of RenNew-D as a sterilant on the performance of reused dialyzers

RenNew-D (Alcide), a novel demand-release sporocidal agent, was employed instead of formaldehyde in the reprocessing for reuse of cuprophan hollow fiber dialyzers (Gambro) and the performance of these dialyzers was evaluated over 40 consecutive dialyses in six patients on maintenance hemodialysis. When RenNew-D was part of automated reprocessing performed with 4.3% bleach as specified by the manufacturer (Lixivitron), dialyzer survival was prolonged (16.7 +/- 7.2 uses) and hemodialysis neutropenia was unchanged with reuse. When RenNew-D was part of manual reprocessing conducted in the absence of bleach, marked improvement in dialyzer biocompatibility was observed but with a decreased survival (4.8 +/- 3.0). The majority of dialyzer failures were due to a fall in fiber bundle volume below a 85% set limit. Small solute clearances were maintained with both types of reprocessing. Dialyses were well tolerated throughout. Our data suggest that RenNew-D is a safe and efficacious product which can serve as a valuable alternative to formaldehyde for the purpose of dialyzer reuse.     

An Outbreak of Pyrogenic Reactions in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients Associated with Hemodialyzer Reuse

Abstract: In February 1992, 22 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis at an outpatient dialysis center experienced pyrogenic reactions (PR). The PR rate was significantly greater (p < 0.001) during the epidemic (February 3–5) than the pre-epidemic period (November 1, 1992-February 1, 1992). All patients with PR used dialyz-ers that had been manually reprocessed either on February 1 or 3. These dialyzers contained up to 120.8 EU/ml of endotoxin in the blood compartment. The only dialyzer reprocessed before February 1 that was available for analysis was found to contain no detectable endotoxin, while dialyzers reprocessed during the epidemic period contained a median endotoxin concentration of 52.8 EU/ ml. The bioburden of water used to prepare dialysate was in excess of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standard for water, ≤200 colony forming units (CFU)/ml. Samples of treated water collected in the reuse area were within AAMI standards at the time of the investigation (February 11 and February 26), but before the investigation, water samples were assayed with a culture method that could not detect micro-bial concentrations below 10³ CFU/ml. In addition, the treated water feed line to the disinfectant container may never have been disinfected. However, no samples were collected from this line during the investigation. This outbreak emphasizes the need to use water that meets the AAMI bacteriologic and endotoxin standards of ≤200 CFU/ml and/or 5 EU/ml, respectively, for reprocessing hemodialyzers and to ensure that appropriate culture techniques are used for treated water and dialysate.     

Outbreak of gram-negative bacteremia and pyrogenic reactions in a hemodialysis center

During the period from April 4, 1988, to April 20, 1988, nine pyrogenic reactions and five gram-negative bacteremias occurred in 11 patients undergoing dialysis. All pyrogenic reactions and gram-negative bacteremias occurred among patients in whom a reprocessed dialyzer was used. The rate of pyrogenic reactions or bacteremias per 100 sessions using a reprocessed dialyzer was higher than in sessions during which a new dialyzer was used (4.5 vs. 0; p = 0.03). Dialyzers were manually reprocessed with 2.5% Renalin germicide. The Renalin concentrations varied widely in 12 dialyzers stored after manual reprocessing during the epidemic period (0.9-4.2%); the median endotoxin concentrations varied from 0 to 246 ng/ml and were higher in dialyzers with Renalin concentrations less than or equal to 1.0% than in dialyzers with higher concentrations (p = 0.01). Experiments using a dilution technique described by a technician resulted in Renalin concentrations ranging from 1.4% at the surface to 3.5% at the bottom of the preparation container. These findings suggest that failure to adequately admix Renalin during dilution may be associated with low levels of disinfectant, high levels of bacteria and endotoxins in dialyzers, and outbreaks of pyrogenic reactions and gram-negative bacteremias in dialysis patients.     

The Adequacy of Fragmin as a Single Bolus Dose with Reused Dialyzers

Abstract: Thirty-four hemodialysis patients were studied in a crossover fashion to compare the effectiveness of bolus-dose Fragmin (a low molecular weight heparin) with regular heparin usage in hemodialysis. For each anticoagulant, 3 dialyzes were studied for each patient; the first sessions involved a new dialyzer, and the subsequent sessions involved dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid. To assess the effectiveness of the anticoagulation regimens, the following were measured: the dialyzer fiber bundle volume and the instantaneous dialyzer clearances for urea (1 h into the second session). In addition, factor Xa levels were measured in 5 patients during the first and second sessions at 0 min, 30 min, and 4 h. Fiber bundle volumes were (in ml) 75.4 ± 8.8, 73.0 ± 8.9, and 73.5 ± 7.6 on first, second, and third uses with Fragmin (p = ns); and 77.8 ± 9.0, 73.4 ± 8.1, and 73.8 ± 8.1 with heparin (p < 0.001 second and third vs. first). Thus, there were no significant differences between Fragmin and heparin. Instantaneous dialyzer clearances were 165.8 ± 12.6ml/min with Fragmin and 163.8 ± 9.8 with heparin (p = ns). Factor Xa levels were 0 predialysis, 0.81 ± 0.17 U/ml at 30 min on first use, and 0.92 ± 0.09 U/ml on second use (p = ns); they were 0.51 ± 0.21 U/ml at 4 h on first use and 0.61 ± 0.16 U/ml on second use (p = ns). Thus, bolus-dose Fragmin provided similar results to constant infusion heparin and is not deleteriously influenced by reprocessing dialyzers with peracetic acid.     

Solute transport in continuous hemodialysis: a new treatment for acute renal failure

A pumpless dialysis technique which combines continuous convection and diffusion was studied in 15 critically ill acute renal failure patients. Fluid identical in composition and purity to that used in peritoneal dialysis was continuously circulated (single-pass) at 16.6 cc/min through the dialysis compartment of a 0.43 m2 flat plate PAN membrane dialyzer. Whole blood clearances for urea, creatinine and phosphate averaged 25.3 +/- 4.4 cc/min, 24.1 +/- 5.5 cc/min and 21.3 +/- 5.6 cc/min, respectively. Over the range of blood flows studied (50 to 190 cc/min) clearances of these solutes were independent of blood flow rate but rather were determined by both dialysate flow rate and ultrafiltration rate. In contrast net fluxes of calcium and sodium were correlated only with ultrafiltration rate. Bicarbonate loss was 0.52 +/- 0.11 mEq/min; K+ balance varied with dialysate K+; glucose uptake from dialysate was 107 +/- 24.0 mg/min. In fresh non-clotting dialyzers, mean ultrafiltration rate was 8.1 cc/min. At QBi of 70 to 190 cc/min, dialysate and blood solute equilibrate yielding a total clearance equal to the dialysate outflow, or 25 cc/min, that is, the sum of dialysate flow rate plus ultrafiltration rate. In comparison to currently used continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH), the exceptionally-high solute clearances obtained with continuous hemodialysis constitute a significant improvement in continuous renal replacement therapy.     

Dilemma of Membrane Biocompatibility and Reuse

Abstract: Numerous articles have been published on the multiple use of dialyzers and on the effect of different reprocessing chemicals and techniques on the dialyzer biocompatibility and performance. The results often appear contradictory, especially those comparing standard biocompatibility parameters. Despite this confusion, a discerning review of the published works allows certain limited conclusions to be drawn. Reprocessing of used hemodialyzers changes the biocompatibility profile of a dialyzer as defined by the parameters complement activation. leukopenia, and cytokine release. The effect of reprocessing depends on the chemicals and reprocessing technique applied and also on the type of membrane polymer being subjected to the reprocessing procedure. Reports of pyrogenic reactions indicate that the flux of the membrane also influences how suitable it is for safe reuse. An increased risk of allergic and pyrogenic reactions appears to be associated with dialyzer reuse. Furthermore, there has been a lack of investigations into the immunologic effect of the layer of adsorbed and chemically altered proteins that remains on the inner surface of reprocessed dialyzers. We conclude that the clinical benefit of dialyzer reuse cannot be generally accepted from a biocompatibility point of view.     

Accelerated removal of deferoxamine mesylate-chelated aluminum by charcoal hemoperfusion in hemodialysis patients

Although deferoxamine mesylate (DFO) is effective in removing aluminum (Al) in hemodialysis patients, treatment with this drug is associated with a number of adverse effects. In order to limit the exposure of patients to DFO-Al complexes, the efficacy of colloidin-coated microencapsulated charcoal cartridges added in series to conventional dialyzers was investigated. The clearances of Al by the sorbent system were initially 116 +/- 4.7 mL/min, but decreased to 42.5 +/- 6.6 mL/min after 120 minutes of treatment. Thereafter, the Al clearances remained constant. In contrast, the Al clearances of the dialyzer were 29.5 +/- 1.8 mL/min initially and did not change during the treatment period. Both the percent and absolute decrease in Al levels after four hours of dialysis were greater with the dialyzers plus carbon cartridges than with the dialyzers alone. This resulted in an increase in the minimum net Al removal from 1,862 +/- 174 micrograms/treatment to 3,007 +/- 43 micrograms/treatment (P less than 0.05). Treatment with sorbent hemoperfusion should be considered in selected hemodialysis patients being treated with DFO for Al overload.     

Anaphylactoid reactions associated with reuse of hollow-fiber hemodialyzers and ACE inhibitors.

From July 18 through November 27, 1989, 12 anaphylactoid reactions (ARs) occurred in 10 patients at a hemodialysis center in Virginia. One patient required hospitalization; no patients died. ARs occurred within minutes of initiating dialysis and were characterized by peripheral numbness and tingling, laryngeal edema or angioedema, facial or generalized sensation of warmth, and/or nausea or vomiting. All 12 ARs occurred with dialyzers that had been reprocessed with an automated reprocessing system. A cohort study, including all patients undergoing dialysis sessions on the six days when an AR occurred, showed that the patients who experienced ARs were significantly more likely than patients who did not to be treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (7/10 vs. 3/33; relative risk = 7.9; 95% confidence interval = 2.5 to 25.2) and to have been exposed to reused dialyzers rather than to new dialyzers (12/70 sessions vs. 0/31; P = 0.016). In those sessions using a reused dialyzer, the mean number of dialyzer uses in case-sessions was significantly higher than for noncase-sessions (10.3 vs. 6.2; P = 0.016). After reuse of dialyzers was discontinued at the center, no further ARs occurred, despite the continued administration of ACE inhibitors. This is the first report of an outbreak of ARs associated exclusively with reused dialyzers. We hypothesize that interactions between a dialyzer that has been repeatedly reprocessed and reused, blood, and additional factors, such as ACE inhibitors, increased the risk of developing ARs.     

Association of dialyzer reuse and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis patients in the US

OBJECTIVES: To determine if reuse of hemodialyzers is associated with higher rates of hospitalization and their resulting costs among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. METHODS: Noncurrent cohort study of hospitalization rates among 27,264 ESRD patients beginning hemodialysis in the United States in 1986 and 1987. RESULTS: Dialysis in free-standing facilities reprocessing dialyzers was associated with a greater rate of hospitalization than in facilities not reprocessing (relative rate (RR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.14). This higher rate of hospitalization was observed with dialyzer reuse using peracetic/acetic acids (RR = 1.11, CI 1. 04-1.18) and formaldehyde (RR = 1.07, CI 1.00-1.14), but not glutaraldehyde (p = 0.97). There was no difference among hospitalization rates in hospital-based facilities reprocessing dialyzers with any sterilant and those not reprocessing. Hospitalization for causes other than vascular access morbidity in free-standing facilities reusing dialyzers with formaldehyde was not different from hospitalization in facilities not reusing. However, reuse with peracetic/acetic acids was associated with higher rates of hospitalization than formaldehyde (RR = 1.08, CI 1.03-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis in free-standing facilities reprocessing dialyzers with peracetic/acetic acids or formaldehyde was associated with greater hospitalization than dialysis without dialyzer reprocessing. This greater hospitalization accounts for a large increment in inpatient stays in the USA. These findings raise important concerns about potentially avoidable morbidity among hemodialysis patients. Copyright Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Solute clearances with high dialysate flow rates and glucose absorption from the dialysate in continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of high inlet dialysate flow rates (IDFR) on the clearances of urea and creatinine and to measure the absorption of glucose through the dialyzer in continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis (CAVHD). Ten anuric acute renal failure patients in the intensive care unit were studied. Increasing the IDFR from 0 to 33.3 mL/min (0 to 2 L/h) produced linear increments in the clearances of urea and creatinine, whereas further increases in the IDFR from 33.3 to 66.7 mL/min (2 to 4 L/h) produced less important, but still significant, increases in the clearances. At 66.7 mL/min, the clearances for urea and creatinine were 48.5 +/- 3.4 and 42.2 +/- 2.5 mL/min, respectively. Using a dialysate with a glucose concentration of 25.3 mmol/L (0.5 g/dL), the net transfer of glucose through the dialyzer did not change significantly, from 16.7 to 66.7 mL/min of IDFR. Increasing the inlet dialysate glucose concentration from 25.3 to 75.8, 126.3, and 214.6 mmol/L (0.5 to 1.5, 2.5, and 4.25 g/dL) at a fixed IDFR of 16.7 mL/min produced linear increments in the net glucose transferred to the patient, from 0.12 +/- 0.02 to 0.67 +/- 0.05, 1.25 +/- 0.06 and 2.30 +/- 0.14 mmol/min, respectively (21.4, 121.0, 225.7, and 414.5 mg/min). No significant changes in the ultrafiltration and plasma flow rates through the dialyzer were recorded at these different IDFR or inlet dialysate glucose concentrations. Ten patients were treated for 4 days or more with 16.7 mL/min (1 L/h) IDFR CAVHD with excellent control over kidney function parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of Reuse on Dialyzer Efficacy

The effect of reuse on dialyzer efficacy was examined by measuring blood compartment volume and dialyzer mass transfer coefficient (maximum dialyzer clearance) as a function of dialyzer use number. The 102 polysulfone dialyzers tested (F60 and HF80, Fresenius) were reprocessed on Renatron machines using peroxyacetic acid as the dual cleansing and sterilizing agent. Each dialyzer was used an average of 14.4 +/- 5.7SD times and was tested once (twice for 13/102 dialyzers) during a routine dialysis session at an arbitrary use number (7.6 +/- 5.3; range 1 to 24). The parameters tested were found to decrease only marginally with reuse, corresponding to a blood compartment volume loss of approximately 1% (R = 0.04) over a 5-week/15-use period and a decrease in dialyzer mass transfer coefficient of approximately 3% (R = 0.07 and 0.06) over the same period for urea and creatinine, respectively. It was concluded that the loss in dialyzer efficacy is negligible over the average use period of almost 5 weeks per dialyzer.     

Cuprophan reuse and intradialytic changes of lung diffusion capacity and blood gases

The changes in arterial blood gas, pulmonary function tests, leukocyte counts and complement activation were evaluated during first use and subsequent reuse of cuprophan dialyzers. The dialysate buffer was bicarbonate. Reuse of cuprophan dialyzers significantly attenuated the fall in leukocyte counts and the rise in C3a des Arg seen during first use dialysis. First use dialysis also caused a drop in arterial paO2 from 93.0 +/- 12.4 mm Hg to a nadir of 82.8 +/- 12.6 mm Hg at 60 minutes (P less than 0.01). PaO2 levels did not change when reused dialyzers were employed (93.7 +/- 12.2 before dialysis and 96.4 +/- 15.2 mm Hg at 60 minutes, P greater than 0.05). Intradialytic paO2 curves obtained during first use and reuse were significantly different by variance analysis (P less than 0.001). There was also a significant decline in lung diffusion capacity (DLCO, from 30.70 +/- 8.89 to 23.77 +/- 7.76 ml/min X mm Hg, P less than 0.01) and transfer factor (KCO, from 6.07 +/- 1.97 to 5.65 +/- 2.13 ml/min X mm Hg, P less than 0.01), during first use at one hour after initiation of dialysis. This decrease was entirely prevented during reuse, (P less than 0.001 vs. first use by variance analysis). Percentual changes in leukocyte counts and C3a des Arg concentration on one hand, and in paO2, DLCO and KCO on the other were significantly correlated to each other. Other factors with a possible influence on intradialytic pulmonary function such as ultrafiltration volume, dialysate buffer composition, evolution of intradialytic blood pH and cardiac output, were all identical under both experimental conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Beta 2-microglobulin kinetics in maintenance hemodialysis: a comparison of conventional and high-flux dialyzers and the effects of dialyzer reuse

beta 2-Microglobulin (beta 2M) forms synovial and bony amyloid deposits in long-term hemodialysis patients. To define the kinetics of beta 2M during hemodialysis and the effects of dialyzer reprocessing, we measured serum beta 2M, plasma C3a, and neutrophil counts immediately predialysis; 15, 90, and 180 minutes after beginning dialysis; and 15 minutes postdialysis in ten chronic hemodialysis patients. The studies were performed during first and third uses of cuprammonium rayon and polysulfone dialyzers processed by rinsing with water, then bleach, in an automated system (Seratronics DRS 4) and then packed in 1.5% formaldehyde. Mean serum beta 2M (corrected for ultrafiltration) decreased by 16.6% +/- 18.1% with new cuprammonium dialyzers and 57.1% +/- 12.8% with new polysulfone dialyzers. Dialyzer reprocessing had no significant effect on this decline. Predialysis serum beta 2M decreased by 30.4% +/- 15.5% 1 month after switching from cuprammonium to polysulfone dialyzers; these levels remained stable after 3 months of dialysis with polysulfone. Complement activation and neutropenia during dialysis were significantly more marked with cuprammonium, but were not affected by reprocessing of either dialyzer. In vitro adsorption of 124I-beta 2M to polysulfone fibers was greater than to cuprammonium; adsorption was not influenced by dialyzer reprocessing.     

Dialyzer Reuse: Interaction Between Dialyzer Membrane, Disinfectant (Formalin), and Blood During Dialyzer Reprocessing

Abstract: The growing practice of dialyzer reuse in recent years is mainly based on medical and economic considerations. However, adverse reactions such as immunohemolytic anemia due to anti-N_from antibody associated with dialyzer reuse have been reported. In this study, scanning electron microscopy and cytologic staining were used to evaluate the interaction between blood components and the reprocessed synthetic dialyzer membrane (polysulfone) after disinfectant (formaldehyde) treatment. The results showed that various blood components such as fibrin and blood cells still adhered to the dialyzer membrane after reprocessing. The study also demonstrated that the adhered denatured blood components could be detached by sonication andlor simulated hemodialysis and then gain access into the circulation. The re-entry of the denatured blood components to the patients exposed to reused dialyzers may result in an enhanced imrnunological response which may contribute to antibody formation (such as anti-N_from antibody) with a reused hemodialyzer.     

Rapid removal of DFO-chelated aluminum during hemodialysis using polysulfone dialyzers

Aluminum (Al) removal following deferoxamine (DFO) therapy in hemodialysis patients was evaluated in a paired-fashion comparing cuprophane (Travenol 12.11) and polysulfone (Fresenius F-80) dialyzers. QB and QD were held constant at 250 and 500 ml/min, respectively. The polysulfone dialyzer increased total plasma Al clearance from 20.0 +/- 2.8 to 80.5 +/- 7.6 ml/min (P less than 0.01), and reduced the t 1/2 of plasma Al during hemodialysis from 538 +/- 113 to 112 +/- 12 min (P less than 0.01). The polysulfone F-80 dialyzer increased Al removal during the first hour of hemodialysis from 518 +/- 191 to 1812 +/- 720 micrograms/hr (P less than 0.01). During a four hour hemodialysis the F-80 dialyzer returned plasma Al levels to pre-DFO values (103 +/- 36 vs. 93 +/- 23, P less than 0.05), suggesting complete removal of the DFO chelated Al complex. In one patient Al removal was evaluated using cuprophane, F-40, F-60 and F-80 dialyzers and the t 1/2 for Al removed decreased from 484.6 to 276.1 and 108 to 99 minutes, respectively. These data show the Fresenius F-80 polysulfone dialyzer effects the rapid removal of DFO-Al complexes. We propose use of the Fresenius F-80 dialyzer in conjunction with reduced DFO doses and i.m. administration of DFO the day prior to dialysis to limit DFO exposure as a method to decrease DFO-related side-effects in hemodialysis patients.     

Dialyzer reuse--part II: advantages and disadvantages

Although single dialyzer use and reuse by chemical reprocessing are both associated with some complications, there is no definitive advantage to either in this respect. Some complications occur mainly at the first use of a dialyzer: a new cellophane or cuprophane membrane may activate the complement system, or a noxious agent may be introduced to the dialyzer during production or generated during storage. These agents may not be completely removed during the routine rinsing procedure. The reuse of dialyzers is associated with environmental contamination, allergic reactions, residual chemical infusion (rebound release), inadequate concentration of disinfectants, and pyrogen reactions. Bleach used during reprocessing causes a progressive increase in dialyzer permeability to larger molecules, including albumin. Reprocessing methods without the use of bleach are associated with progressive decreases in membrane permeability, particularly to larger molecules. Most comparative studies have not shown differences in mortality between centers reusing and those not reusing dialyzers, however, the largest cluster of dialysis-related deaths occurred with single-use dialyzers due to the presence of perfluorohydrocarbon introduced during the manufacturing process and not completely removed during preparation of the dialyzers before the dialysis procedure. The cost savings associated with reuse is substantial, especially with more expensive, high-flux synthetic membrane dialyzers. With reuse, some dialysis centers can afford to utilize more efficient dialyzers that are more expensive; consequently they provide a higher dose of dialysis and reduce mortality. Some studies have shown minimally higher morbidity with chemical reuse, depending on the method. Waste disposal is definitely decreased with the reuse of dialyzers, thus environmental impacts are lessened, particularly if reprocessing is done by heat disinfection. It is safe to predict that dialyzer reuse in dialysis centers will continue because it also saves money for the providers. Saving both time for the patient and money for the provider were the main motivations to design a new machine for daily home hemodialysis. The machine, developed in the 1990s, cleans and heat disinfects the dialyzer and lines in situ so they do not need to be changed for a month. In contrast, reuse of dialyzers in home hemodialysis patients treated with other hemodialysis machines is becoming less popular and is almost extinct.     

The effects of reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers with peroxyacetic acid on beta 2-microglobulin removal in hemodiafiltration.

The reuse of dialyzers is widely practiced, especially in the United States. Despite this, the effects of reuse on the efficacy of removal of solutes and more recently proteins such as beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) are the subject of much debate. There is considerable evidence to suggest that reuse after cleansing and sterilizing with formalin, with or without bleach, maintains dialyzer performance. In this study, we have examined peroxyacetic acid use as the cleansing and sterilizing agent using Renatron machines. We analyzed reuse in 24 patients using polysulfone membranes in a hemodiafiltration (HDF) unit over a 2-year period. The mean maximum number of uses achieved was 20.1 +/- 0.5. Several factors considered clinically to influence the number of reuses achievable (hemoglobin, white blood cell, and platelet levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and fibrinogen and total protein levels) were found not to influence the maximum number of uses obtainable. We then assessed prospectively the performance of 26 polysulfone dialyzers after peroxyacetic acid reprocessing up to 20 times, particularly with regard to their ability to remove beta 2M. We report that this combination of polysulfone membranes reprocessed with peroxyacetic acid used for HDF up to 20 times exhibits a maintained high level removal of compounds beyond a molecular weight (MW) of 12,000. Any secondary membrane formation that occurs appears not to influence the subsequent removal of beta 2M. Thus, we would recommend the use of peroxyacetic acid for reprocessing dialyzers in a safe and efficacious manner.