Recurrent pulmonary embolism from left subclavian thrombosis: a case report

A 38-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of pulmonary thromboembolism. Thrombolysis therapy resulted in initial improvement in symptoms and laboratory data. However, 4 months later, pulmonary thromboembolism recurred despite antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy. Contrast venography and venous ultrasonography of both upper and lower extremities revealed subtotal occlusion and venous thrombosis of the left subclavian vein with collateral vessels, but no evidence of lower extremity venous thrombosis. She had no history of subclavian venous catheterization, neoplasm, hypercoagulability or other predisposing cause of thrombus formation. Operative ligation of the left subclavian vein was performed at the junction with the internal jugular vein. White thrombus was identified within the venous lumen. She was well without recurrent pulmonary thromboembolism or venous insufficiency for 10 months after the operation. Surgical interruption of the subclavian vein may be effective to prevent recurrent pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with recurrent pulmonary thromboembolism due to venous thrombosis of the upper extremity despite therapeutic anticoagulation.     

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis

Upper extremities deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) is a rare condition. According to the literature, approximately 4–10% of all cases of venous thrombosis may involve the subclavian, axillary or brachial veins. In the last few decades, the incidence of UEDVT has increased because of more frequent use of central venous catheters (CVCs) and cardiac pacemaker implantation. In addition, another common risk factor for UEDVT is cancer. UEDVT is classified as primary, approximately one-third of cases, which refers either to effort thrombosis or idiopathic UEDVT, or secondary, due to the presence of overt predisposing causes. The onset of UEDVT is usually characterized by arm swelling and pain, but may also be completely asymptomatic especially in patients with a long-term presence of a CVC. Ultrasonography represents a simple and accurate diagnostic tool to demonstrate the problem. UEDVT has major clinical consequences including pulmonary embolism, recurrences, post-thrombotic syndrome, and death. The role of thromboprophylaxis for those patients with a long-term CVC is still controversial. Unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin, followed by an oral anticoagulant are the most common treatments, with strategy of management similar to that of deep vein thrombosis of the leg. Thrombolysis/thrombectomy and surgical decompression are often successful, but less frequently used. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to clarify the optimal management of UEDVT, and to identify patients at the highest risk of recurrence who might benefit from long-term anticoagulation.     

Lipoma causing upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: A case report

We report a case of lipoma in the right infraclavicular and axillary area compressing subclavian vein there by presenting with upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) and persistent symptoms of venous congestion. Patient was also found to be a heterozygous carrier of prothrombin 20210 gene mutation. Surgical excision of lipomatous tissue performed after 6 months of anticoagulation resulted in a complete resolution of symptoms.     

Advanced management of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: emergency department and beyond

Recent attention to the increasing incidence of venous thromboembolism has included a call to action from the surgeon general and new guidelines from various specialty organizations. The standard of care for treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the emergency department (ED), supported by the 2008 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines, involves initiation of anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin, pentasaccharide, or unfractionated heparin. For selected appropriate patients with extensive acute proximal deep venous thrombosis, the ACCP guidelines now recommend thrombolysis in addition to anticoagulation to reduce not only the risk of pulmonary embolism but also the risk of subsequent postthrombotic syndrome and recurrent deep venous thrombosis. Postthrombotic syndrome is a potentially debilitating chronic cluster of lower-extremity symptoms occurring in 20% to 50% of deep venous thrombosis patients subsequent to the acute insult, sometimes not until years later. A strategy of early thrombus burden reduction or frank removal might reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome, as per natural history studies, venous thrombectomy data, observations after systemic and catheter-directed thrombolysis, and the still-limited number of randomized trials of catheter-directed thrombolysis (with anticoagulation) versus anticoagulation alone. Contemporary invasive (endovascular) treatments mitigate the drawbacks historically associated with thrombolytic approaches by means of intrathrombus delivery of drugs with greater fibrin specificity and lower allergenicity, followed by mechanical dispersion to accelerate lysis and then aspiration of remaining drug and clot debris. With a 2016 target completion date, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute--sponsored Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal With Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis trial is comparing the safety and efficacy, in terms of both deep venous thrombosis and postthrombotic syndrome parameters, of the most evolved pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis devices versus standard anticoagulation therapy alone. This article reviews the grounds for use of adjunctive thrombolysis in patients with acute proximal deep venous thrombosis and begins to identify types of deep venous thrombosis patients encountered in the ED who might benefit most from multidisciplinary consideration of early referral for possible endovascular therapy.     

Decision-Making in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism comprising deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus is common. Patients with venous thromboembolism may present to a variety of health care providers, and while a significant proportion of patients begin treatment in the hospital, ambulatory management of both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus is feasible and becoming more common. Initial anticoagulant management, investigation of venous thromboembolism etiology, and decisions about extended anticoagulation require coordinated care by physicians from multiple specialties. Comprehensive management of venous thromboembolism requires coordinated care from the time of presentation in order to expedite diagnosis, initiate timely anticoagulant treatment, determine the need for extended anticoagulation based on risk of bleeding and recurrent thrombosis, and advise on thromboprophylaxis during future high-risk periods for venous thromboembolism. In this review we use case scenarios to provide an operational framework, based on current evidence-based recommendations, for informed decision-making about a number of clinical practice issues that are frequently encountered in the management of venous thromboembolism patients.     

Prevention of venous thromboembolism

The aim of prophylaxis in venous thromboembolism is firstly to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism and secondly to reduce the morbidity associated with deep vein thrombosis and the post-phlebitic limb. Particularly high-risk groups are identifiable and include those over 60 years of age undergoing major surgery, patients with malignancy and those undergoing hip operations. Low-dose subcutaneous heparin (5000 U s.c. commenced two hours preoperatively and continued eight to twelve hourly until the patient is fully mobile) is unequivocally effective in preventing deep vein thrombosis in medical and surgical patients and, most importantly, significantly reduces the incidence of fatal postoperative pulmonary embolism and total mortality. Furthermore, in established deep vein thrombosis, low-dose heparin limits proximal clot propagation, which is the prelude to pulmonary embolism. Despite this, surveys have demonstrated an alarming deficiency amongst clinicians in the application of measures to prevent venous thromboembolism. Heparin prophylaxis carries a small risk of increased bleeding complications, mostly evidenced by the frequency of wound haematoma rather than major haemorrhage. Low molecular heparin fragments (e.g. Fragmin, Choay, Enoxaprin) are now emerging as useful alternative agents, having the advantage of once daily administration and yet providing similar efficacy in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis. However, protection against fatal pulmonary embolism has yet to be demonstrated. Mechanical methods of prophylaxis designed to counteract venous stasis, such as graduated elastic compression stockings, are also beneficial in protection against deep vein thrombosis but by themselves do not achieve such consistently good prophylaxis as low-dose heparin. However, clinical trials with combinations of mechanical methods and low-dose heparin indicate that this may be the optimum approach to very high-risk patients. In the presence of established acute deep vein thrombosis, anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay in preventing pulmonary embolism. Vena caval interruption procedures should be reserved for patients in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated or for those who develop recurrent pulmonary embolism despite adequate anticoagulation.     

Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

This guidance document focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Efficient, cost effective diagnosis of VTE is facilitated by combining medical history and physical examination with pre-test probability models, D dimer testing and selective use of confirmatory imaging. Clinical prediction rules, biomarkers and imaging can be used to tailor therapy to disease severity. Anticoagulation options for acute VTE include unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs are as effective as conventional therapy with LMWH and vitamin K antagonists. Thrombolytic therapy is reserved for massive pulmonary embolism (PE) or extensive deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Inferior vena cava filters are reserved for patients with acute VTE and contraindications to anticoagulation. Retrievable filters are strongly preferred. The possibility of thoracic outlet syndrome and May-Thurner syndrome should be considered in patients with subclavian/axillary and left common iliac vein DVT, respectively in absence of identifiable triggers. The optimal duration of therapy is dictated by the presence of modifiable thrombotic risk factors. Long term anticoagulation should be considered in patients with unprovoked VTE as well as persistent prothrombotic risk factors such as cancer. Short-term therapy is sufficient for most patients with VTE associated with transient situational triggers such as major surgery. Biomarkers such as D dimer and risk assessment models such the Vienna risk prediction model offer the potential to customize VTE therapy for the individual patient. Insufficient data exist to support the integration of bleeding risk models into duration of therapy planning.     

Spectrum of upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis in a community teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to characterize the spectrum of upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis in a community teaching hospital. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective analysis was used at a large urban teaching hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 90 patients with ultrasound-documented thrombosis of the internal jugular, subclavian, axillary, or brachial veins to determine clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcome. RESULTS: The most common underlying conditions associated with upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis were the presence of a central venous catheter in 65 patients (72%), infection in 25 (28%), extrathoracic malignancy in 20 (22%), thoracic malignancy in 19 (21%), renal failure in 19 (21%), and a prior lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis in 16 (18%). Pain was noted in 31 (34%) patients, and 76 patients (84%) had edema of the involved extremity. The left subclavian vein was involved in 44 patients (49%), and 35 patients (39%) had a central venous catheter in the left subclavian vein. When a central venous catheter was present, the deep venous thrombosis was usually ipsilateral (P <.001). Heparin and warfarin were administered to 65 (72%) and 53 (59%) of the patients, respectively. Eleven patients (12%) died. Of these patients, 8 (73%) had an underlying infection, whereas only 22% of survivors had an infection (P =.0012). CONCLUSION: Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis typically occurs in patients with a systemic illness in the presence of a central venous catheter. The left subclavian vein is frequently involved because this is a common site for placement of a central venous catheter. Pain is uncommon, but edema of the involved extremity is noted in the majority of patients. The mortality rate of patients in this study with an upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis was 12%; most patients who died had a central venous catheter and an underlying infection.     

Treatment of venous thrombosis associated with Behcet’s disease: immunosuppressive therapy alone versus immunosuppressive therapy plus anticoagulation

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy alone with that of combination therapy involving immunosuppressants and anticoagulation for the treatment of venous thrombosis in Behcet’s disease (BD). A retrospective analysis was made of 37 patients with venous thrombosis in BD. BD patients with venous thrombosis were divided into three groups: one group (N = 16) received immunosuppressive therapy alone, another group (N = 17) received immunosuppressant and anticoagulation combination therapy, and the third group (N = 4) received anticoagulation therapy only. Clinical and laboratory parameters and the recurrence of venous thrombosis were assessed. Venous thrombosis in BD appeared to have a more diffuse pattern than idiopathic type and a predilection for lower limbs. The most commonly involved sites were the superficial and common femoral veins. Recurrence of venous thrombosis occurred in two cases in the immunosuppressant group (12.5%), one case in the combination therapy group (5.9%), and three cases in the anticoagulant group (75%). No significant difference was found between recurrence in the immunosuppressant and combination therapy groups. Acute phase reactants were elevated in all six patients at the time of venous thrombosis recurrence. Our study suggests that immunosuppressive therapy is essential and that anticoagulation therapy might not be required for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis associated with BD.     

腔内治疗下腔静脉漂浮血栓8例

目的 总结下腔静脉(inferiorvenacava,IVC)漂浮血栓的临床特点.方法 选取2014年1月至2019年8月北京友谊医院收治的8例接受腔内治疗的IVC漂浮血栓患者,并总结其诊断和治疗方法及漂浮血栓的临床特点.结果 3例经IVC造影发现,5例经增强CT发现,其中5例有肺栓塞,1例伴有左肾静脉血栓,5例有下肢...     

Deep vein thrombosis followed by internal jugular vein thrombosis as a complication of in vitro fertilization in a woman heterozygous for the prothrombin 3' UTR and factor V Leiden mutations

Thrombosis of the internal jugular vein is a rare event but one that can have serious consequences. Most cases reported in the literature have occurred in patients with indwelling central venous catheters, in association with head and neck sepsis, or in hypercoagulable states. However, a small number of cases have been associated with in vitro fertilization and more often with the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). We report the case of a 30-year-old woman heterozygous for both the prothrombin 3' UTR mutation and for the factor V Leiden mutation who presented with a proximal deep vein thrombosis following in vitro fertilization. She subsequently developed an internal jugular vein thrombosis extending into the subclavian and axillary vein despite therapeutic anticoagulation with a low molecular weight heparin. Thromboembolic events can occur in the absence of other clinical features of OHSS, especially in patients with underlying prothrombotic abnormalities. Neck pain and swelling in a pregnant woman, especially one that has undergone in vitro fertilization, should be taken seriously and investigated with duplex scanning and/or MRI. Women with a personal or family history of thrombosis undergoing in vitro fertilization should be made fully aware of the potential thrombotic risks and should be considered for a thrombophilia screen.     

Splanchnic and Extrasplanchnic Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: Prophylaxis vs Treatment

Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occur in up to 6.3 % and 15.9 % of patients with cirrhosis, respectively. There is recent evidence that a procoagulable prothrombotic state is related to cirrhosis despite the reduced levels of many coagulation factors, and decreased platelet counts. Indeed, (i) the combination of high levels of factor VIII, with low levels of protein C and antithrombin induces a procoagulant state in vitro; while (ii) increased levels of von Willebrand factor and decreased ADAMTS 13 activity can compensate for decreased platelet counts. PVT is partial in a majority of patients in whom it develops and may spontaneously resolve in some of them. Although PVT is associated with features of more severe liver disease, it is uncertain whether it plays a causal role in the decompensation of cirrhosis. In patients listed for liver transplantation, PVT may make the procedure difficult or impossible. Pre-transplant PVT is associated with increased post-transplant mortality rates. Studies evaluating clinical outcome of anticoagulation therapy for splanchnic or extrasplanchnic venous thrombosis are scarce. Anticoagulation therapy, given to patients with cirrhosis of intermediate severity before PVT occurrence, in prophylactic doses, appears to decrease decompensation and mortality rate. Interestingly, this improvement is out of proportion of the prophylaxis of extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. The risk of bleeding does not seem to be increased in patients with cirrhosis receiving anticoagulation therapy, once prophylaxis for bleeding related to portal hypertension has been implemented. Overall, the room for anticoagulation therapy is probably larger than previously recognized, and may be of particular benefit in patients without portal vein thrombosis. However, clinical trials remain to be done before the benefit risk ratio of anticoagulation therapy is properly evaluated.     

肺癌合并静脉血栓栓塞症的风险评估

静脉血栓栓塞症(venous thromboembolism,VTE)是癌症常见的并发症和最常见的死亡原因之一,主要包括深静脉血栓栓塞症和肺血栓栓塞症.近年来,随着血栓栓塞性疾病研究的深入,肺癌相关性VTE已引起关注.其中,肺癌患者的预防性抗凝治疗具有很大争议性.初级预防能使肺癌相关性VTE发生风险减少,但相关研究同时提示患者出血风险提高.目前尚不推荐对肺癌患者进行常规抗凝,但对血栓风险高、出血风险低的肺癌患者进行选择性抗凝可使其获益.因此,肺癌相关性VTE的风险评估和分级可提高预防性抗凝的临床获益,减少相关出血事件.     

Factor V Leiden in central venous catheter-associated thrombosis

Subclavian vein thrombosis is a well-recognized complication following central venous catheter insertion and is associated with significant morbidity. The factor V Leiden mutation is an important risk factor for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Whether this mutation also predisposes patients fitted with a central venous catheter to subclavian vein thrombosis is not known. The occurrence of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis was investigated in 277 consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. All patients received a tunnelled double or triple catheter positioned in the subclavian vein. Catheter-associated thrombosis was diagnosed on the basis of clinical signs of thrombosis, i.e. swelling and/or redness of the limb or venous engorgement and was confirmed with a colour-flow Doppler ultrasound. Thirteen patients were heterozygous for the factor V Leiden mutation. Seven of these patients had a subclavian vein thrombosis (54%), while this occurred in only 9% of the factor V Leiden-negative patients, corresponding with a relative risk of 7.7 (95% CI 3.3-17.9). Factor V Leiden is attributable for 17.3% of all thrombosis in patients with central venous catheters. The majority of patients with the factor V Leiden mutation with a central venous catheter will develop thrombosis. Patients with a factor V Leiden mutation should receive adequate thrombosis prophylaxis upon catheter introduction and the catheter should be removed immediately after the treatment. Based on this very high risk, we advise testing for factor V Leiden in all bone marrow transplantation patients receiving a central venous catheter.     

经静脉植入起搏器术后静脉血栓的发生率及其可能的相关因素

目的 初步探讨经静脉植入起搏器后静脉血栓的发生情况及可能影响因素。 方法 入选我科2017.5~2017.11起搏器程控门诊随访时复查了植入侧静脉超声（锁骨下静脉、腋静脉和颈内静脉）的起搏器植入患者84例，收集其术前临床资料、实验室检查、心脏影像学及双侧锁骨下静脉、腋静脉和颈内静脉的超声结果以及服用抗凝抗血小板药物的情况，术后起搏器程控门诊随访时复查的植入侧的上述静脉超声结果，进行统计分析。 结果 3例（4%）患者发生了静脉血栓事件，分别是扩张性心肌病并发重度心功能减低和阵发性房颤，单腔起搏器升级为双腔起搏器，先天性三尖瓣下移畸形伴大量返流并发Ⅲ°AVB、起搏器植入术后电极穿孔行新电极植入和穿孔电极的拔除。 结论 经静脉植入起搏器术后发生静脉血栓的风险相对较小，最多见于手术较复杂、患者心功能较低、并发心脏结构异常、术中出现电极穿孔等并发症的患者。      

Portal and superior mesenteric venous thrombosis treated with urokinase infusion via superior mesenteric artery]

Portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis is an uncommon disease, but clinically important, because it accounts for 5% to 15% of acute mesenteric ischemia. The diagnosis is often delayed because the conditions are nonspecific abdominal symptoms. In addition, when this occurs in young individual without any known predisposing factor, the diagnosis may become even more difficult. The treatment of mesenteric venous thrombosis involves anticoagulation therapy alone or in combination with surgery. The addition of thrombolytic therapy to the treatment of portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis may enhance the clearance of thrombus and hasten the clinical improvements. We present a case of mesenteric venous thrombosis treated with catheter-directed infusion of urokinase via the superior mesenteric artery and systemic anticoagulation.     

Thrombotic complications in 2928 patients with COVID-19 treated in intensive care: a systematic review

A prothrombotic state is reported with severe COVID-19 infection, which can manifest in venous and arterial thrombotic events. Coagulopathy is reflective of more severe disease and anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis is recommended in hospitalized patients. However, the prevalence of thrombosis on the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear, including whether this is sufficiently addressed by conventional anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. We aimed to identify the rate of thrombotic complications in ICU-treated patients with COVID-19, to inform recommendations for diagnosis and management. A systematic review was conducted to assess the incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU-treated patients with COVID-19. Observational studies and registries reporting thrombotic complications in ICU-treated patients were included. Information extracted included patient demographics, use of thromboprophylaxis or anticoagulation, method of identifying thrombotic complications, and reported patient outcomes. In 28 studies including 2928 patients, thrombotic complications occurred in 34% of ICU-managed patients, with deep venous thrombosis reported in 16.1% and pulmonary embolism in 12.6% of patients, despite anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, and were associated with high mortality. Studies adopting systematic screening for venous thrombosis with Duplex ultrasound reported a significantly higher incidence of venous thrombosis compared to those relying on clinical suspicion (56.3% vs. 11.0%, p?<?0.001). Despite thromboprophylaxis, there is a very high incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19 on the ICU. Systematic screening identifies many thrombotic complications that would be missed by relying on clinical suspicion and should be employed, with consideration given to increased dose anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, whilst awaiting results of prospective trials of anticoagulation in this cohort.

     

Heparin therapy for venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

Intravenous heparin is the initial treatment of choice for most patients with acute pulmonary embolism or proximal deep vein thrombosis. The primary objective of initial heparin therapy in such patients is to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism. The efficacy of intravenous heparin for this purpose has been established by randomized clinical trials in patients with pulmonary embolism, and more recently, in patients with proximal vein thrombosis. Heparin is given as an initial intravenous bolus of 5000 units, followed by a maintenance dose of 30,000-40,000 units per 24 h by continuous intravenous infusion. A recent randomized trial in patients with proximal vein thrombosis indicates that failure to achieve an adequate anticoagulant response (APTT greater than 1.5 times control) is associated with a high risk (25%) of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Intravenous heparin administered in doses that prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) to 1.5 or more times the control value is highly effective, and associated with a low frequency (2%) of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Heparin is continued for 7-10 days, overlapped with warfarin sodium during the last 4-5 days. Multiple randomized clinical trials indicate that this approach is highly effective. An alternative approach is to commence heparin and oral anticoagulants together at the time of diagnosis, and to discontinue heparin on the fourth or fifth day. A recent randomized trial in patients with submassive venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism suggests that 4-5 days of initial heparin therapy is effective and safe, but this approach must be evaluated by further randomized trials before it is recommended for patients with extensive proximal vein thrombosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Symptomatic endpoints for venous thromboembolism treatment

Clinical trials evaluating antithrombotic therapy for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis require that the diagnosis is confirmed by objective testing prior to patient entry into the study. Two basic approaches may then be taken for defining endpoints to assess the efficacy of antithrombotic treatment. In the first approach, the diagnostic test is repeated at a predetermined time following the initiation of the interventional therapy. In the second approach, no further diagnostic testing is routinely performed for a minimum of 3 months following patient enrolment after the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism for evidence of symptomatic recurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. This approach is used in later-phase clinical trials to examine whether a novel therapeutic agent is as safe and effective as the drugs currently used for management of venous thromboembolism. Symptomatic recurrent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism confirmed by objective testing are clinically important causes of patient morbidity, place patients at increased risk of fatal pulmonary embolism, cause increased rates of chronic thromboembolic complications and have resource consequences. Studies utilizing symptomatic recurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism as endpoints have been responsible for most of the treatment advances in the management of patients with venous thromboembolism that have been observed in the past 40 years. Although confirmation of recurrent venous thromboembolism is not possible in all patients, clinical trials using rigorous methodology can minimize the potential bias caused by the limitations of diagnostic test results. There is a need to develop better objective tests in the future, to distinguish previous from recurrent venous thromboembolism.     

20例急性肺栓塞临床诊治分析

目的 分析肺栓塞患者的临床资料和治疗情况,改善其预后.方法 对收治的20例急性肺栓塞患者的临床特点和治疗预后进行分析.结果 基础疾病为下肢深静脉血栓6例（30.00%）、外科手术（介入治疗）5例（25.00%）、心血管疾病4例（20.00%）、创伤与骨折2例（10.00%）、慢性肺部疾病2例（10.00%）、恶性肿瘤1例（5.00%）.主要临床表现为呼吸困难,占85.00%,其次为呼吸急促,占80.00%.10例采用单纯抗凝治疗患者,治愈2例、显效6例、好转和无效各1例;10例采用静脉溶栓治疗,治愈2例、显效5例、好转2例和无效1例.结论 急性肺栓塞临床缺乏特征性表现,争取早期明确诊断,而且临床治疗应个体化,针对患者自身情况采取静脉溶栓或单纯抗凝治疗.