Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing

JUTZY, R.V., ET AL.: Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing. While dual chamber pacing is considered superior to VVI pacing at rest, there is a continuing debate as to the relative benefit of AV synchrony versus rate increase with exercise. To evaluate this question and to correlate different methods of evaluation, 14 patients with DDDR pacemakers were studied using serial treadmill exercise test with a CAEP protocol. Patients were exercised in DDD, DDDR, and VVIR modes. Echo-Doppler cardiac outputs were determined and pulmonary gas exchange was measured during exercise. There was a significant improvement in cardiac output with exercise in the DDDR versus VVIR modes, and in DDDR versus DDD modes in patients with chronotropic incompetence. There were small increases in exercise duration in DDDR versus VVIR modes, and small but consistent increases in VO, at all levels of exercise, though not statistically significant. In this group of patients, DDDR pacing was superior to VVIR pacing, and superior to DDD pacing when chronotropic incompetence was present.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

Importance of Heart Rate Response During Exercise in Patients Using Atrioventricular Synchronous and Ventricular Pacemakers

Atrioventricular synchronous pacing offers advantages over fixed-rate ventricular (VVI) pacing both at rest and during exercise. This study compared the hemodynamic effects at rest and exercise of ventricular pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, ventricular pacing where the rate was increased during exercise and dual chamber pacing. Ten patients, age 63 +/- 8 years, with multiprogrammable DDD pacemakers were studied using supine bicycle radionuclide ventriculography. Radionuclide data during dual chamber pacing was acquired at rest and during a submaximal workload of 200-400 kpm/min. The pacemakers were then programmed to VVI pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, and 1 week later, studies were repeated in the VVI mode at rest, during exercise at a rate of 70 beats/min, and during exercise with the VVI pacemaker programmed to a rate adapted to the DDD pacing exercise rate. At rest, the cardiac output was lower in the VVI compared with the AV sequential mode (4.1 +/- 1.1 vs 5.7 +/- 1.1 1/min, P less than 0.01). During exercise, the cardiac output increased from resting values in the DDD and VVI pacing modes, however cardiac output in the rate-adapted VVI mode was higher than in the VVI mode with the rate maintained at 70 beats/min (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 1.1 1/min, P = 0.02). Three patients completed lower workloads with VVI pacing at 70 beats/min compared with AV synchronous pacing. At rest, AV sequential pacing was superior to VVI pacing, suggesting the importance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. With VVI pacing during exercise, cardiac output was improved with an increased pacemaker rate, suggesting that the heart rate response during exercise was the major determinant of the higher cardiac output.     

Influence of AV Synchrony on the Plasma Levels of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide (ANP) in Patients with Total AV Block

ANP was determined in 13 patients with DDD pacemakers due to total AV block, at rest and during bicycle ergometry under both pacing modes, DDD and VVI (7O/min). Under DDD pacing, the mean ANP level (normal range 5-95 pg/mL) at rest was 36 +/- 18 pg/mL (mean +/- SD) and increased significantly by the factor of 3.5 to 1 27 pg/mL during exercise (p less than 0.01). By just changing the pacing mode to VVI, the ANP levels rose to 73 +/- 28 pg/mL (p less than O.0 1) at rest (= 203% of DDD resting level) and to 216 +/- 184 pg/mL (= 170% of DDD peak level) during exercise P less than 0.01). These results show that under AV synchronous pacing, the ANP levels we generally lower. A possible explanation for this increased release of ANP during asynchronous VVI pacing is the acute increase of the atrial wall tension which occurs when the atria contacts during the systole against closed AV valves.     

A Double-Blind Study of Submaximal Exercise Tolerance and Variation in Paced Rate in Atrial Synchronous Compared to Activity Sensor Modulated Ventricular Pacing

To assess the variation in paced rate during everyday activity and the importance of atrioventricular synchronization (AV synchrony) for submaximal exercise tolerance, atrial synchronous (DDD) and activity rate modulated ventricular (VVI,R) pacing were compared in 17 patients with high degree AV block. The patients were randomly assigned to either mode and evaluated by treadmill exercise to moderate exertion and by 24-hour Holter monitoring after 2 months in the DDD and VVI,R modes, respectively. At the end of the study, the patients were programmed to the pacing mode corresponding to the preferred study period. During the treadmill test, the mean exercise time to submaximal exertion (Borg 5/10), exertion ratings and respiratory rate did not differ between pacing modes despite a significantly lower ventricular rate in the VVI,R mode. The atrial rate during VVI,R pacing was significantly higher than the ventricular rate, but did not differ from the ventricular rate during DDD pacing. There was a diurnal variation in paced rate in both pacing modes. Paced ventricular rate was, however, higher and variation in paced rate greater in DDD compared to VVI,R pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode, three patients preferred the VVI,R mode, while five subjects did not express any preference. The results from this study indicate that the variation in paced rate during activity sensor-driven VVI,R pacing does not match that during DDD pacing neither during everyday activities nor during submaximal treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, no differences in exercise time, Borg ratings, and respiratory rate during submaximal exercise were found. Thus, for most patients with high degree AV block, DDD and VVI,R pacing seem equally satisfactory for submaximal exercise.     

Importance of ventricular rate after mode switching during low intensity exercise as assessed by clinical symptoms and ventilatory gas exchange

Automatic mode switching from DDD(R) to DDI(R) or VVI(R) pacing modes has improved dual chamber pacing in patients at high risk for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, little is known about the effect of ventricular pacing rate adaptation after mode switching. We conducted a single-blinded, crossover study in 15 patients (58 +/- 21 years) with a DDD pacemaker who had AV block and normal sinus node function to investigate the influence of pacing rate adaptation to intrinsic heart rate during low intensity exercise. Patients performed two tests (A/B) of low intensity treadmill exercise (0.5 W/kg) in randomized order. They initially walked for 6 minutes while paced in DDD mode. The pacing mode was then switched to VVI with a pacing rate of either 70 beats/min (test A) or matched to the intrinsic heart rate (95 +/- 11 beats/min test B). Respiratory gas exchange variables were determined and patients classified the effort before and after mode switching on a Borg scale from 6 to 20. Percentage changes of respiratory gas exchange measurements were significantly larger (O2 consumption: -8.2 +/- 5.0% vs. -0.6 +/- 7.2%; ventilatory equivalent of CO2 exhalation: 5.3 +/- 4.9% vs. 1.5 +/- 4.3%; respiratory exchange ratio: 7.0 +/- 2.2% vs. 3.5 +/- 3.0%; end-tidal CO2: -5.7 +/- 2.9% vs. -1.8 +/- 2.7%; all P < 0.01) and the increase in subjective assessment of the effort tended to be higher (mean increase on Borg scale: 1.6 +/- 1.9 vs. 1.1 +/- 1.8, P = 0.07) after heart rate unadjusted than after adjusted mode switching. Mode switching from DDD to VVI pacing is better tolerated and gas exchange measurements are less influenced if ventricular pacing rate is adjusted to the level of physical activity. Thus, pacing rate adjustment should be considered as part of automatic mode switch algorithms.     

Quality-of-Life in DDDR Pacing: Atrioventricular Synchrony or Rate Adaptation?

Al though differences in exercise performance have been observed between different rate adaptive modes, the relative impact of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and rate adaptation on quality of life (QOL) have not been determined. Thirty-three patients with either sinoatrial disease (18) or complete atrioventricular (AV) block (15) received DDDR pacemakers (16 minute ventilation sensing, 17 activity sensing). There were 11 males and 22 females, with a mean age of 66 ± 1 (range 39–78) years. The study was a double-blind, triple cross-over study comparing DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes. At the end of each 8-week study period in each mode, QOL was assessed by a questionnaire evaluating patients' functional class (Classes I-IV), physical malaise inventory (41 items), illness perception (43 items), and overall QOL rating based on a 48 items measure covering different aspects of the patients' daily life adjustment. Two patients required early crossover from VVIR mode during the study. Patients experienced significantly fewer physi cal malaise such as temperature intolerance, dyspnea, and palpitations in the DDDR mode, compared with either DDD or VVIR pacing. DDDR pacing reduced the perception of illness in 5 of 43 items compared to VVIR pacing, and improved stamina and appetite compared to DDD pacing. The overall QOL score was 102 ± 2, 105 ± 2, 113 ± 2 in the DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes, respectively, with a higher score indicating a poorer QOL (DDDR/DDD vs VVIR, P < 0.02). There was no change in functional classes between the three pacing modes. In conclusion, VVIR pacing has a lower QOL compared with DDD pacing, which can be further enhanced with rate augmentation.     

Short-Term and Long-Term Changes of Left Ventricular Volumes During Rate-Adaptive and Single-Rate Pacing

To evaluate the adaptation of the heart to exercise during pacing, 15 patients with permanent endocardial pacemakers were studied; nine patients had atrioventricular universal (DDD) pacemakers (Symbios 7005) and six patients had activity detecting rate-responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacemakers (Activitrax 8403). Left ventricular function in each patient during rate variable pacing was compared to ventricular function during VVI single-rate pacing. End-systolic and end-diastolic volume changes during exercise were measured by radionuclide angiography and the amount of volume change was used to assess left ventricular function. Both short-term (within 4 hours) and long-term measurements (after at least 4 weeks) were made at rest and at 50% of the maximal exercise capacity in DDD or VVIR mode and were compared with VVI single-rate pacing. All patients, when changed from DDD or VVIR mode to VVI single-rate pacing showed a significant increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise, which increased even more after long-term VVI pacing. During long-term rate variable pacing, there was no increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise. DDD or VVIR pacing initially showed a substantial increase of the end-systolic volume during exercise combined with a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction, suggesting a decrease of the left ventricular contractility. After 4 weeks, contractility improved both with DDD and VVIR pacing. We conclude that short-term DDD and VVIR pacing induces a temporary impairment of left ventricular function that improves after 4 weeks, whereas long-term VVI pacing is associated with left ventricular dilatation even at moderate levels of exercise.     

Comparison of Low Rate Dual Chamber Pacing to Activity Responsive Rate Variable Ventricular Pacing

A study was undertaken to evaluate exercise performance in 18 dual chamber pacemaker patients believed to be chronotropically incompetent. All patients were paced in a DDD AV synchronous mode at 80 beats per minute (beats/min) as well as an externally triggered, activity responsive VVIR mode. Patients underwent two single blind, randomized symptom-limited treadmill tests (Sheffield protocol). Four of the 18 patients achieved intrinsic rates greater than 100 beats/min and were deleted from the primary study. It was noted that all four of these patients performed best with intrinsic rate response and AV synchrony. Thirteen of the remaining 14 patients demonstrated improved exercise tolerance in the VVIR mode. Average exercise time in the VVIR mode (7:25 +/- 3:12 min) was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than the DDD mode (6:01 +/- 2:27 min). Work performed was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the VVIR mode (4.77 +/- 1.97 METS) than in the DDD mode (3.78 +/- 0.77 METS). Maximum heart rates were 83.86 +/- 5.11 beats/min in DDD mode versus 116.00 +/- 10.56 beats/min in VVIR mode. The results demonstrated that improved exercise tolerance can be achieved with single chamber rate variable pacing compared to DDD pacing in patients with chronotropic incompetence. However, potential symptoms associated with loss of AV synchrony should be ruled out.     

Efficacy and Safety of Rate Responsive Pacing in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Angina Pectoris

The present study included 17 patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in whom a rate responsive ventricular pacemaker (Medtronic Activitrax) had been implanted. All patients had an exclusively paced rhythm. Single blinded, random, cross-over treadmill tests in the rate responsive pacing mode (VVIR) and in the fixed-rate demand mode (VVI) were performed, with an interval of 4-6 weeks. Mean exercise duration increased by 25% during VVIR pacing. Maximal heart rate increased significantly during VVIR compared to VVI pacing (VVI = 74 +/- 2 bpm, VVIR = 116 +/- 8 bpm, P less than 0.001) as did the rate-pressure product (VVI = 10.850 +/- 1,124, VVIR = 16.628 +/- 2,110, P less than 0.001). Despite improved performance, the number of anginal attacks per week and the nitroglycerin consumption did not show a significant difference between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that rate responsive pacing is beneficial and safe in patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease.     

Effects of Chronotropic Responsive Cardiac Pacing on Ventilatory Response to Exercise in Patients with Complete AV Block

To identify the effect of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on the ventilatory response to exercise, ten selected patients with complete atrioventricular block underwent paired cardiopulmonary exercise tests in fixed rate ventricular (WI) and dual chamber (DDD) or rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing modes. Compared to VVI pacing, DDD or VVIR pacing increased peak oxygen uptake (P < 0.005) and augmented anaerobic threshold (P < 0.001), In eight patients, dyspnea was the major symptom limiting exercise with VAT pacing and this was markedly attenuated with DDD or VVIR pacing. In all patients, ventilation (VE) and the ratio of ventilation to CO₂ production (VE/VCO₂) were consistently higher with VVI pacing during exercise. To compare the response of the two pacing modes at the same workloads in an aerobic condition, we measured ventilatory variables 1 minute prior to the anaerobic threshold obtained with VVI pacing. When DDD or VVIR pacing was compared with VVI pacing, VE and VE/VCO₂ significantly decreased from 20.5 ± 5.3 L/min to 18.3 ± 5.0 L/min (P < 0.005) and from 35.9 ± 5.8 to 31.9 ± 5.0 (P < 0.003), respectively. Respiratory frequency rose significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.001) despite an unchanged tidal vohame. Although peak VE did not differ between the two pacing modes, VE/VCO₂ at the peak exercise increased significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005). Respiratory frequency also rose more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005) and tidal volume did not change. This study suggests that chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing attenuates the exertional dyspnea by improving the ventilatory response to exercise as well as increasing the cardiac output in patients with complete atrioventricular block.     

Aerobic Capacity in Rate Modulated Pacing

Whether heart rate or AV synchrony is the most important factor for an increase in aerobic capacity was evaluated in a comparative study between sinus bradycardia, VVIR, DDD, and DDDR stimulation. Sixteen patients (mean age 67 years) with chronotropic incompetence and impJanted DDDR pacemaker (Telectronics META 1250) were randomly studied by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. All patients were exercised to their anaerobic threshold (ATJ with the following heart rates: DDD 84 ± 3, WIR 110 ± 5, and DDDR 116 ± 6 beats/min. Mean oxygen uptake (VO₂, mL/kg per min) at AT was 7.4 ± 0.3 in DDD and WIR modes. A 12% increase was measured in DDDR mode (8.3 ± 0.4). Compared to VVIR work capacity in the DDDR mode was improved by 17% (41 vs 48 W/min). In patients with isolated sinus node disease (n = 9) the increase of VO₂ and work capacity at AT during DDDR mode was more pronounced (16% and 20%, respectively, compared to VVIR). In patients with intermittent second or third degree AV block (n = 7) the differences between the pacing modes were not significant. This might partly be due to a lesser degree of chronotropic incompetence in this subgroup. In conclusion only the conjunction of heart rate increase and preservation of AV synchrony provides a significant improvement in aerobic capacity during exercise.     

Quality of Life in Patients with Rate Responsive Pacemakers: A Randomized, Cross-Over Study

Eleven patients with rate responsive pacemakers (7 men, 4 women, mean age 41 years with a range of 23-60) were randomly assigned to a cross-over study in order to assess their overall exercise capacity and quality-of-life (QOL) scores. All of the pacemakers were implanted for complete AV block or sick sinus syndrome. The pacemakers were randomly programmed into VVI or rate responsive (VVIR) pacing modes for 3-week study periods in each mode. At the end of each period, an exercise test was performed and the QOL was evaluated by the "Hacettepe Quality-of-Life Questionnaire". All patients exercised longer in the VVIR mode (mean 10.54 ± 0,73 min) than in the VVI mode (mean 7.81 ± 0.62 min) (P < 0.05). QOL scores were also found to be significantly higher in the VVIR mode (mean 173.81 ± 16.22 points) compared to the VVI mode (mean 156.27 ± 21.22 points) (P < 0.01). In conclusion, our results suggest that VVIR pacing offers a better QOL in addition to an improved exercise capacity, compared to the single chamber nonrate modulated pacing (VVI).     

A Time-Related Study of the Hemodynamic Benefit of Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Evaluated by Doppler Echocardiography

We have used Doppler echocardiography to estimate the stroke volume (SV) in a study of 13 patients equipped with DDD pacemakers. SV was measured both during DDD and VVI pacing after observation times of 1,3,6, and 12 months of DDD pacing. SV was also measured at seven atrioventricular (AV) intervals (75-250 ms) in the search for optimal AV intervals. Mitral flow velocity was investigated to see if DDD pacing resulted in synchronous atrial contraction, and if mitral insufficiency existed at any of the pacing modes. Compared with the VVI mode, DDD pacing resulted in a mean increase in SV of 21 +/- 2% for the four observation periods. Two patients with severe left ventricular failure had no significant increase in SV during DDD vs VVI pacing. In each patient, an optimal AV interval ranging between 100-250 ms for the SV was found. Velocity profiles of mitral flow showed synchronous atrial contraction during DDD pacing, but not during VVI pacing. Mitral insufficiency was not seen in any pacing mode. DDD pacing resulted in a reduction in SV during the first 6 months, and was constant thereafter. Doppler echocardiography can be used repeatedly to evaluate the hemodynamic response of DDD pacing vs VVI pacing, and to find which AV interval gives the highest SV in the individual patient. Our study further shows that the hemodynamic benefit of DDD pacing is present after short-term as well as after long-term DDD pacing.     

Influence of Pacing Mode and Rate on Peripheral Levels of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide (ANP)

The effect of acute modifications of pacing mode and rate on plasma ANP levels was evaluated. ANP was determined in ten resting patients with DDD pacemakers due to binodal disease or intermittent second-and third-degree AV block. At 82/minute pacing rate the ANP plasma levels (normal range 2 to 30 fmol/mL) corresponded to those under AAI (4.05 +/- 2.10 fmol/mL) and DDD (4.18 +/- 2.02 fmol/mL) pacing, but increased significantly (P 0.05) during VVI pacing (6.96 +/- 3.70 fmol/mL). Acceleration of DDD stimulation frequency from 82 to 113/minutes led to significant increase of ANP levels by the factor of three in all chosen AV delays. The lowest ANP plasma levels were measured at 175 msec AV delay under 82/minute pacing rate in DDD mode. Under 113/minutes the differences of ANP concentration after variations of AV delays were less pronounced. The influences of altered atrial pressure and tension on ANP release are discussed to account for changes in ANP plasma levels following different modes and rates of pacemaker stimulation.     

Myocardial Demands of Atrial-Triggered Versus Fixed-Rate Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Complete Heart Block

Hemodynamics, myocardial oxygen consumption, and lactate concentration were determined by cardiac catheterization at rest and during exercise in eight patients treated with AV universal pacemakers (DDD) for high degree AV block. The pulse generator was alternately programmed in ventricular inhibited (VVI) or atrial synchronous (VAT) mode. During VVI pacing, the cardiac output rose between rest and exercise (4.3-7.6 L/min) due to increased stroke volume. VAT pacing gave significantly greater increase (4.5-8.8 L/min) which, as the stroke volume was unchanged, resulted from accelerated heart rate. The myocardial oxygen consumption and the coronary blood flow did not differ between VVI and VAT mode at rest or during exercise, nor did the modes make a difference in arterial systolic and pulmonary wedge pressures. These observations suggested that VAT pacing offers higher cardiac output than VVI pacing, but with similar demands on myocardial oxygen consumption.     

AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial

In 19 patients paced and medicated for bradycardia tachycardia syndrome (BTS), AAIR and DDDR pacing were compared with regard to quality of life (QoL), atrial tachyarrhythmia (AFib), exercise tolerance, and left ventricular (LV)function. Patients had a PQ interval < or = 240 ms during sinus rhythm, no second or third degree AV block, no bundle branch block, or bifascicular block. In DDDR mode, AV delay was optimized using the aortic time velocity integral. After 3 months, QoL was assessed by questionnaires, patients were investigated by 24-hour Holter, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) was performed, and LV function was determined by echocardiography. QoL was similar in all dimensions, except dizziness, showing a significantly lower prevalence in AAIR mode. The incidence of AFib was 12 episodes in 2 patients with AAIR versus 22 episodes in 7 patients with DDDR pacing (P = 0.072). In AAIR mode, 164 events of second and third degree AV block were detected in 7 patients (37%) with pauses between 1 and 4 seconds. During CPX, exercise duration and work load were higher in AAIR than in DDDR mode (423+/-127 vs 402+/-102 s and 103+/-31 vs 96+/-27 Watt, P < 0.05). Oxygen consumption (VO2), was similar in both modes. During echocardiography, only deceleration of early diastolic flow velocity and early diastolic closure rate of the anterior mitral valve leaflet were higher in DDD than in AAI pacing (5.16+/-1.35 vs 3.56+/-0.95 m/s2 and 69.2+/-23 vs 54.1+/-26 mm/s, P < 0.05). As preferred pacing mode, 11 patients chose DDDR, 8 patients chose AAIR. Hence, AAIR and DDDR pacing seem to be equally effective in BTS patients. In view of a considerable rate of high degree AV block during AAIR pacing, DDDR mode should be preferred for safety reasons.     

Is Accurate Rate Response Programming Necessary?

Exercise capacity and general well-being are improved by appropriately programmed rate responsive pacemakers when compared to fixed rate units. Ten patients had activity sensing DDDR units implanted for combined AV block and sinus node incompetence. Ten patients had Sensolog activity sensing VVIR units implanted for complete heart block. The effects of over and under programming of rate response in both dual and single chamber activity sensor rate adaptive pacemakers has been assessed subjectively by visual analog scales and specific activity questionnaires and objectively by graded treadmill testing and the performance of standardized daily activities. Patients were randomly programmed to absent rate response (VVI in the Sensolog group), hyporesponsive (DDD in the dual chamber group), appropriate response (VVIR, DDDR according to Manufacturer's instructions) and over responsive (VVIR+, DDDR+) in a double-blind crossover design. Thirty percent of patients demanded early crossover from VVI, 30% from DDDR+ and 50% from VVIR+. Perception of Exercise Capability was similar to objective exercise treadmill times which were shorter in VVI than in VVIR or VVIR+ (P less than 0.05) or control subjects (P less than 0.001). There was no difference between any dual chamber mode or control subjects. General well-being was poorest in DDDR+ and VVIR+ modes despite objective improvement in exercise capacity. Symptoms were least in VVIR and DDDR and all but one patient chose appropriate programming as their overall preferred mode. Thus, even inaccurate rate response programming results in similar and improved exercise capacity compared to absent rate response but overprogramming is unacceptable to most patients, confirming that appropriate programming and sensor specificity is critical in rate responsive pacing.     

Clinical Study of a New Activity Sensor for Rate Adaptive Pacing Controlled by Electrical Signals Generated by the Kinetic Energy of a Moving Magnetic Ball

A new rate adaptive pacemaker (Sensorithm) controlled by an activity sensor providing electrical signals induced by a magnetic ball moving freely in an elliptical cavity surrounded by two copper coils, was implanted in ten patients; mean age of 75 years (range 64–89). Six patients had atrioventricular block and four had sinus node disease. In auto-set testing procedure during a 1-minute walk in the corridor, a slope resulting in a maximum rate of 95 beats/min was selected in every patient, and a medium reaction time was programmed. During graded treadmill exercise tests the heart rate increased 63 ± 7 beats/min to 135 ± 6 beats/min in rate adaptive pacing mode (VVIR), and 15 ± 6 beats/min (P < 0.0001) in ventricular pacing mode (VVI). The symptom-limited exercise time was 9.1 ± 1.1 minutes and 8.2 ±1.2 minutes (P = NS), and the exercise distance was 501 ± 95 meters and 428 ± 92 meters (P < 0.05) in VVIR and VVI pacing mode, respectively. The maximum oxygen uptake was 20.6 ± 2.6 mL/kg per minute in VVIR pacing and 18.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg per minute (P < 0.05) in VVI pacing. The delay time until the pacing rate increased 10% of the total rate increase at onset of treadmill exercise was 4.4 ± 0.7 seconds. Assuming a linear relation between metabolic workload and heart rate response from rest to the age predicted maximum heart rate, a deviation of heart rate ranging from 13.5 ± 11.2% to –1.6 ± 5.2% from the expected heart rate at mid-point and endpoint of each quartile of workload was observed during treadmill testing. Conclusions : By using a 1 -minute walk test for selecting an appropriate slope setting, Sensorithm provided a significant and proportional heart rate increase during exercise resulting in an improvement of exercise capacity during VVIR pacing compared to VVI pacing.     

Quality-of-Life in Patients Treated with Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Compared to Rate Modulated Ventricular Pacing: A Long-Term, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

To investigate whether the preservation of afrioventricular (AV) synchronization matters for quality-of-life during pacemaker treatment we assessed 17 consecutive patients with high degree AV block and preserved sinus node function in a double-blind, long-term crossover study. A questionnaire with regard to cardiovascular symptoms, sleep disturbances, cognitive functioning, physical ability, social interaction, emotional functioning, and self-perceived health was completed after 2 months of atrial synchronous (DDD) and rate modulated ventricular pacing (VVI,R), respectively. A significant improvement in shortness of breath, dizziness and palpitations as well as an improvement of cognitive functioning was observed during DDD pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode and three the VVI,R mode. The remaining five patients did not express any preference. The preference for the DDD mode was explained by a significant reduction of cardiovascular symptoms and an improved self-perceived health, physical ability, and psychological well-being during DDD pacing. All differences in quality-of-life parameters between the two modes of pacing favored the DDD mode and no adverse effects of this mode were found. Thus, the maintenance of AV synchrony adds further symptomatic relief compared to rate increase alone. The results indicate that DDD pacing is the preferred mode of pacing in patients with high degree AV block and preserved sinus node function.