Can continuous low current electrical stimulation distinguish insulated needle position in the epidural and intrathecal spaces in pediatric patients?

BACKGROUND: Muscle twitches elicited with electrical stimulation (6-17 mA) during epidural insertion indicate correct epidural needle placement while muscle twitches at a lower current (<1 mA) may indicate intrathecal needle placement. This study examined whether applying continuous electrical stimulation at 6 mA could indicate needle entry into the epidural space without inadvertently penetrating the intrathecal space. METHODS: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, 10 pediatric patients scheduled for lumbar puncture were studied. Following sedation with propofol, an insulated 24-gauge Pajunck unipolar needle was inserted through an 18-gauge introducer needle placed at the L4-5 interspace. The needle was first connected to a nerve stimulator (6 mA) and advanced. At the first sign of muscle twitching, needle advancement was stopped and the threshold current for motor activity was determined. The current was then turned off, the stylet was removed and the needle checked for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). If CSF was not present, the needle was advanced into the intrathecal space (as confirmed by the presence of CSF). Ten pediatric patients (ASA II or III) aged 7.8 +/- 4.3 years (2.8-16.0 years) were studied. RESULTS: All patients had two distinguishable threshold currents as the needle advanced. The mean threshold current to elicit muscle twitch in the presumed epidural space was 3.84 +/- 0.99 mA. CSF was not present in any of the patients at this location. The mean threshold current in the intrathecal space was 0.77 +/- 0.32 mA. The average estimated distance from the first threshold location to the intrathecal space was 3 mm. All muscle twitches were at the L3-5 myotomes. Nine muscle twitches were unilateral and one was bilateral. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring with an insulated needle with electrical stimulation at 6 mA may prevent unintentional placement of epidural needles into the intrathecal space.     

Threshold current of an insulated needle in the intrathecal space in pediatric patients

A threshold current of <1 mA has been suggested to be sufficient to produce a motor response to electrical stimulation in the intrathecal space. We designed this study to determine the threshold current needed to elicit motor activity for an insulated needle in the intrathecal space. Twenty pediatric patients aged 7.3 +/- 3.9 yr scheduled for lumbar puncture were recruited. After sedation with propofol, patients were turned to the lateral position and an 18-gauge or 20-gauge introducer needle was placed at the L4-5 level through which an insulated 24-gauge Pajunck unipolar needle (with a Sprotte tip and stylet) was inserted. The needle was advanced into the intrathecal space as suggested by the presence of a "pop." At this point, a nerve stimulator was attached to the insulated needle and the current was gradually increased until motor activity was evident. The needle hub was checked for cerebrospinal fluid. If cerebrospinal fluid was not present, the needle was advanced further until cerebrospinal fluid was present. The threshold current was retested. The mean current in the intrathecal space required to elicit a motor response was 0.6 +/- 0.3 mA (range, 0.1-1 mA). In 19 patients, the twitches were observed at the L4-5 myotomes and 1 patient had twitches at L2. Twitches were observed unilaterally in 19 children and bilaterally in one child. This confirms the hypothesis that the threshold current in the intrathecal space is <1 mA and that it differs significantly from the threshold currents reported for electrical stimulation in the epidural space.     

The use of electrical stimulation to monitor epidural needle advancement in a porcine model

Muscle twitches elicited with electrical stimulation (ES) during epidural insertion may indicate epidural needle location. We examined the potential application of ES at 5 mA as a continuous method of monitoring the response to epidural needle advancement in a porcine model. Five 20-kg pigs were used in this study. A needle with a stimulating current of 5 mA was inserted at 20 separate levels in each pig. The needle was advanced until a muscle twitch was observed without loss-of-resistance (LOR). The needle position was then assessed using LOR. At the end of the experiment, an autopsy was performed to assess the spinal cord for injury. A total of 100 needle insertions were performed in the 5 pigs. The threshold current in the epidural space was 3.6 +/- 0.6 mA. In 59 of the needle insertions, LOR was not obtained at the depth at which a muscle twitch was initially observed. However, after advancing these 59 needles another 1-2 mm, LOR was obtained. In the other 41 insertions, LOR was observed without further advancement of the needle. Autopsies indicated there were no dural punctures or spinal cord damage in any of the pigs. These observations suggest that ES can be used to signal that the epidural needle is in or approaching the epidural space. However, the high false positive predictive value (59%) makes it impractical and unreliable to detect the precise entry of a needle into the epidural space in pigs.     

Estimation of equivalent threshold currents using different pulse widths for the epidural stimulation test in a porcine model

Background

The epidural stimulation test can help detect if a catheter is correctly positioned in the epidural space. Previous studies showed that a current of up to 16 mA was required to elicit a motor response, but few peripheral nerve stimulators can produce a current this high. Manipulating pulse width can produce a positive response at a lower current. To clarify the effects of pulse width on the epidural stimulation test, we performed a single-blinded study in a porcine model to estimate the equivalent current needed at varying pulse widths.

Methods

After obtaining local ethics approval, an 18G insulated Tuohy needle was advanced into the epidural space at the lower lumbar spinal level, and a 20G stimulating epidural catheter was advanced 30 cm cephalad. A gradually increasing electrical current was applied, and a motor response was elicited at pulse widths of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, and 1 msec. This was followed by a 1-2 cm catheter withdrawal, and the process was repeated for a total of 15 locations per pig.

Results

Recorded threshold currents ranged from 0.36-9.5 mA at a pulse width of 0.2 msec. Our results show a linear relationship between threshold current and pulse width.

Conclusions

In situations where different pulse widths are needed, the nomograms presented here may be useful to estimate the equivalent threshold current which is required to elicit a motor response according to previously published criteria for epidural stimulation tests.     

The threshold current in the intrathecal space to elicit motor response is lower and does not overlap that in the epidural space: a porcine model

Purpose

Using electrical epidural stimulation, a current of 1 to 10 mA is required to confirm the presence of the tip of an epidural catheter in the epidural space. The purpose of this study was to examine the hypothesis that the threshold current required to elicit a motor response in the intrathecal space is significantly lower than that in the epidural space in a porcine model.

Methods

Four 20-kg pigs were used in this experiment. Eighteen gauge, insulated, Tuohy needles were advanced into the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique at five different spinal levels in each pig. When the epidural space was entered, an electrical current was applied to the needle and increased progressively until a motor response was elicited. The needle was then further advanced until cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was observed or until the needle had been advanced a maximum of 1 cm. At this point, the current was reapplied and increased until motor activity was evident.

Results

A total of 20 needles were inserted in four pigs. The current required to produce a motor response in the epidural space was 3.45 ± 0.73 mA (mean ± SD). The current required to produce a motor response in the intrathecal space (entry confirmed by the presence of CSF) was 0.38 ± 0.19 mA (mean ± SD). Two needles were advanced 1 cm without obtaining CSF but the current thresholds were similar to those obtained when CSF was evident (0.4 mA and 0.3 mA, respectively).

Conclusion

The threshold current of an insulated needle required to elicit a motor response in the intrathecal space, was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than that in the epidural space in a porcine model.     

Cervical epidural analgesia via a thoracic approach using nerve-stimulation guidance in adult patients undergoing total shoulder replacement surgery

BACKGROUND: Continuous cervical epidural anesthesia can provide excellent peri- and post-operative analgesia, although several factors prevent its widespread use. Advancing catheters from thoracic levels to the cervical region may circumvent these barriers, provided they are accurately positioned. We hypothesize that guiding catheters from thoracic to cervical regions using low-current epidural stimulation will have a high success rate and enable excellent analgesia in adults undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, adult patients were studied consecutively. A 17-G Tuohy needle was inserted into the thoracic epidural space using a right paramedian approach with loss of resistance. A 20-G styletted epidural catheter, with an attached nerve stimulator, was primed with saline and a 1-10 mA current was applied as it advanced in a cephalad direction towards the cervical spine. Muscle twitch responses were observed and post-operative X-ray confirmed final placement. After a test dose, an infusion (2-8 ml/h) of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml and morphine 0.05 mg/ml (or equivalent) was initiated. Verbal analog pain scale scores were collected over 72 h. RESULTS: Cervical epidural anesthesia was performed on 10 patients. Average current required to elicit a motor response was 4.8 +/- 2.0mA. Post-operative X-ray of catheter positions confirmed all catheter tips reached the desired region (C4-7). The technical success rate for catheter placement was 100% and excellent pain control was achieved. Catheters were positioned two to the left, four to the right and four to the midline. CONCLUSION: This epidural technique provided highly effective post-operative analgesia in a patient group that traditionally experiences severe post-operative pain and can benefit from early mobilization.     

Thoracic epidural analgesia via the lumbar approach using nerve stimulation in a pediatric patient with Down syndrome

This case illustrates the threading of an epidural catheter with electrical stimulation guidance from the lumbar epidural space to the thoracic space in a pediatric patient. A 17-year-old boy with Down syndrome, weighing 48 kg, was scheduled to undergo a laparotomy for duodenal obstruction and gastrostomy tube insertion. Combined general and continuous epidural anesthesia was selected for his anesthetic. Following the induction of general anesthesia and tracheal intubation, a 17G Tuohy needle (Arrow International, Inc., Reading, PA) was inserted into the lumbar space (L3-4) using loss of resistance with air. A 20G styletted epidural catheter was then inserted and threaded cranially. As the catheter was advanced, a low electrical current (1-10mA) was applied to the catheter. Motor response was observed from the lower limb muscles to the upper abdominal muscles as the catheter advanced cranially. After 22 cm of the epidural catheter had been inserted, intercostal muscle movement (T9 - 10) was observed at 3.0 mA. Radiographical imaging later confirmed the catheter tip at T10. The patient awoke without distress and was discharged to the ward with subsequent good pain control from a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% with 1 microg ml(-1) fentanyl at 4-6 ml(-1).     

Electrophysiologic effect of injectates on peripheral nerve stimulation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A small volume of local anesthetic or normal saline abolishes the muscle twitch induced by a 1ow current (0.5 mA) during electrolocation. This study examines the hypothesis that the mechanism of this phenomenon is primarily the electrophysiologic effect of the injectate on the electrical current density at the needle tip. METHODS: Five pigs were studied. An insulated Tuohy needle was inserted in each pig toward the left and right brachial plexuses and the left and right femoral nerves. The needle was advanced until corresponding motor responses were observed at each site, using a current of 0.5 mA. The effect of injecting 1 mL each of normal saline and 5% dextrose in water (NS and D5W) on muscle twitch was investigated at all 20 needle insertion sites. Changes in the conductive area induced by the injectates were also demonstrated using gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: In all cases, the muscle twitches were abolished immediately after the injection of NS and recovered instantaneously after a subsequent injection of D5W. The electrical resistance between the needle and the ground electrodes decreased instantly after the NS injection. The resistance not only recovered but also increased after the injection of D5W. In the gel electrophoresis experiment, the results demonstrated that the expanded conductive area induced by the saline column surrounding the insulated needle was similar to that observed with the uninsulated needle. CONCLUSION: The injection of a conducting solution (i.e., NS) rendered the current that was previously sufficient to elicit a motor response (0.5 mA) ineffective. The most likely reason for this change is that the conductive area surrounding the stimulating needle expanded after the injection and dispersion of the conducting solution (i.e., NS), thereby reducing the current density at the target nerve. This effect can be reversed by injecting a nonconducting solution (i.e., D5W) via the stimulating needle.     

Confirmation of direct epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in pediatric anesthesia

We evaluated the success rate of using low current electrical stimulation (the Tsui test) to identify and confirm direct epidural catheter placement in a pediatric population. Thirty subjects received a standard anesthetic and administration of the Tsui test on epidural placement. The distribution of myotomal activity was recorded. The intended and actual level of the epidural catheter was compared. Myotomal activity was seen in all patients but one. The median current resulting in myotomal activity was 5.3 mA. The median difference between the intended and actual level as confirmed on radiograph was 1.8 levels. The clinical success rate was 93.9%. The positive predictive value of the Tsui test was 82%; i.e., in 23 of 28 cases, the Tsui test correctly identified the position of the epidural catheter tip within 2 vertebral levels. The test did not offer any added advantage when used in the setting of directly placed epidural catheters in our institution over "blind" methods already used to confirm catheter position when using cutaneous landmarks and test dosing. IMPLICATIONS: A new technique to confirm epidural catheter position uses low current electrical stimulation in pediatric patients. This study evaluated the use of electrical stimulation in 30 pediatric patients for directly placed catheters. Electrical stimulation did not provide any advantage over conventional methods (e.g., cutaneous landmarks) for confirmation of catheter position.     

The placement of the epidural catheter at the predicted site by electrical stimulation test

More accurate segmental and sagittal positioning of the epidural catheter tip is required for the success of continuous epidural analgesia, spinal cord monitoring, and percutaneous epidural spinal cord stimulation. We examined the usefulness of an electrical stimulation test for verifying the proper placement of the epidural catheter tip at the predicted site in the posterior epidural space by using a locally developed epidural catheter with electrodes at its tip. The test included the observation of segmental bilateral muscle twitches and the patient's report of feeling in the region stimulated by moving the epidural catheter electrode back and forth and changing the direction of the bevel of the Tuohy needle. The success rate of midline placement at the required spinal segment was significantly more frequent (99%; P < 0.001) in the group (n = 289) receiving the electrical stimulation test compared with the group (n = 277) not receiving the test (success rate 57%). The results indicate the usefulness of this method. We concluded that the electrical stimulation test is effective for verifying the proper placement of the catheter electrode tip. IMPLICATIONS: Ideally the epidural catheter tip should be positioned in the posterior epidural space near the midline. We concluded that the electrical stimulation test is effective for verifying the proper placement of the catheter electrode tip.     

Electrophysiological stimulation (Tsui test) is feasible for epidural catheter positioning in adults with chronic back pain: a cohort study

Purpose

Determining epidural catheter placement and accurately depositing corticosteroids at the site of the pathology in adults with chronic back pain can be challenging. Fluoroscopy is considered the standard of care for guiding epidural catheter positioning and subsequent injection in patients receiving epidural corticosteroids, but the technique has some limitations. We hypothesized that electrophysiological stimulation using the Tsui test is feasible for determining the appropriate epidural catheter position in adults with chronic back pain receiving epidural corticosteroids.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 12 patients receiving epidural corticosteroid injections for chronic back pain. Anatomical landmarks and epidural needle positions were initially confirmed by fluoroscopy. Epidural catheter position was assessed according to sensory and motor responses, as described by Tsui et al. (Can J Anaesth 45: 640-644, 1998). The current was increased slowly from zero until muscle activity was visible or the current reached 10 mA. The catheter was then advanced until muscle responses occurred in the desired myotome. The test was deemed positive or negative according to the Tsui criteria. The anatomical level was confirmed by fluoroscopy prior to injection.

Results

Electrophysiological stimulation effectively established the appropriate epidural catheter position in 11 patients (92%). Epidural stimulation occurred at a mean (SD) threshold of 3.95 (3.35) mA. The kappa statistic between interventions was 0.65, indicating a substantial level of agreement.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that electrophysiological stimulation using the Tsui technique is feasible for epidural catheter positioning in adults with chronic back pain. It may optimize epidural steroid injection in this population.     

Guidance of Block Needle Insertion by Electrical Nerve Stimulation: A Pilot Study of the Resulting Distribution of Injected Solution in Dogs

Background: Little is known regarding the final needle tip location when various intensities of nerve stimulation are used to guide block needle insertion. Therefore, in control and hyperglycemic dogs, the authors examined whether lower-intensity stimulation results in injection closer to the sciatic nerve than higher-threshold stimulation.

Methods: During anesthesia, the sciatic nerve was approached with an insulated nerve block needle emitting either 1 mA (high-current group, n = 9) or 0.5 mA (low-current group, n = 9 in control dogs and n = 6 in hyperglycemic dogs). After positioning to obtain a distal motor response, the lowest current producing a response was identified, and ink (0.5 ml) was injected. Frozen sections of the tissue revealed whether the ink was in contact with the epineurium of the nerve, distant to it, or within it.

Results: In control dogs, the patterns of distribution using high-threshold (final current 0.99 +/- 0.03 mA, mean +/- SD) and low-threshold (final current 0.33 +/- 0.08 mA) stimulation equally showed ink that was in contact with the epineurium or distant to it. One needle placement in the high-threshold group resulted in intraneural injection. In hyperglycemic dogs, all needle insertions used a low-threshold technique (n = 6, final threshold 0.35 +/- 0.08 mA), and all resulted in intraneural injections.     

The epidural structure changes during deep breathing

PURPOSE: Previous experience has suggested that the insertion of an epidural catheter becomes easier when the patient takes a deep breath. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of respiration on the epidural space. METHODS: We examined the epidural space using a flexible epiduroscope in 20 patients undergoing thoracic epidural anesthesia. A 17-gauge Tuohy needle was inserted using the paramedian technique and the loss-of-resistance method with 5 ml air. The epiduroscope was introduced into the epidural space via the Tuohy needle. Each patient was requested to take a deep breath when the epiduroscope was positioned at the needle tip and at approximately 10 cm cephalad from the needle tip within the epidural space. The changes in the epidural structure during deep breathing at each site were then measured. RESULTS: In 80% of the patients, fatty tissue occupied the needle tip. Through the patients' maximal inspiration, the fatty tissue moved and a visible cavity expanded at the needle tip. Cross section area of the visible cavity at the needle tip was greater at the maximal inspiratory level than at the resting expiratory level: 12.1 +/- 6.7% vs 2.8 +/- 2.1% (mean +/- SD, P < 0.0001). In all patients, the visible cavity within the epidural space, which had already been expanded by injected air, became more expanded after maximal inspiration. Cross section area of the visible cavity at the 10 cm cephalad position was greater at the maximal inspiratory level than at the resting expiratory level: 20.6 +/- 10.0% vs 7.0 +/- 5.3% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Epiduroscopy showed that deep breathing expanded the potential cavity of the epidural space. We suggest that the changes in the epidural structure during deep breathing may assist in the insertion of an epidural catheter.     

The effect of epidural needle type on postdural puncture headache: a randomized trial

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized trial in labouring parturients was undertaken to assess whether the 18G Special Sprotte epidural needle is associated with a lower incidence of accidental dural puncture (ADP) in comparison with the 17G Tuohy needle. A secondary purpose was to determine if the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH ) differed between groups when ADP occurred. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval 1,077 parturients requesting epidural analgesia at three tertiary obstetrical units were randomized to epidural catheter insertion with a 17G Tuohy or 18G Special Sprotte needle. Patients were followed for seven days by a blinded assessor to determine the occurrence of PDPH using standardized criteria. If postural headache or neck ache presented, an ADP was diagnosed even if cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was not observed at insertion. This subgroup was followed daily to assess headache characteristics and response to blood patch. RESULTS: Six Tuohy group patients, and two patients in the Sprotte group were excluded. One of the six excluded in the Tuohy group had an ADP. Twenty-eight ADPs occurred, nine unrecognized by CSF visualization (1.8% Tuohy, 3.4% Sprotte, P = 0.12). The incidence of unrecognized ADPs was higher in the Sprotte group (40% Sprotte vs 20% Tuohy, P < 0.05). If ADP occurred, the incidence of PDPH was lower in the Sprotte group (100% Tuohy vs 55% Sprotte, P = 0.025). The ease of use, and user satisfaction were higher in the Tuohy group (84 +/- 17.3% Tuohy vs 68.2 +/- 25.3% Sprotte, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ADP was not reduced with the Special Sprotte epidural needle in comparison with the Tuohy needle, but PDPH after ADP occurred less frequently in the Sprotte group.     

Thoracic epidural catheter insertion using the caudal approach assisted with an electrical nerve stimulator in young children

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether thoracic epidural catheter placement using the caudal approach and assisted with an electrical stimulator could be performed in young children. METHODS: Ten young children (1-4 years) who underwent abdominal surgeries were studied. Under general anesthesia without muscle relaxants, caudal catheter placement was performed using an 18-gauge Crawford-type needle and a 20-gauge radiopaque epidural catheter with a stainless-steel stylet. A metal adapter and a 3-way stopcock were attached to the catheter to connect to an electrical stimulator and to inject physiological saline. Electrical stimulation was performed intermittently while advancing the catheter until it reached the target length. The catheter position was confirmed on postoperative roentgenogram. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 32.2 +/- 10.1 months (13-48 months), and the height was 85.3 +/- 6.1 cm (72-93 cm). In 9 of 10 patients, an epidural catheter could be placed at the first insertion. In 1 patient, the catheter could be placed successfully at the second insertion. The electrical current required for muscle contraction at the target length was 5.8 +/- 1.5 mA. CONCLUSION: Electrical stimulation reliably indicated the location of the catheter tip. This technique for thoracic epidural catheter insertion was easy to perform and could be used in young children.     

Inability to Consistently Elicit a Motor Response following Sensory Paresthesia during Interscalene Block Administration

Background: Two methods of nerve block based on eliciting neural feedback with the block needle currently exist. The paresthesia technique uses sensory feedback to ascertain that the needle tip is close to the nerve. By contrast, a peripheral nerve stimulator makes use of motor responses to electrical stimulation. The relation of motor responses to an electrical peripheral nerve stimulator and sensory nerve contact (paresthesia) had not been studied.

Methods: Thirty consecutive unpremedicated patients who presented for shoulder surgery with interscalene block anesthesia were prospectively studied. Interscalene block was performed by the single paresthesia method of Winnie, using an insulated or noninsulated needle connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator with the power off. At the precise point of paresthesia, the peripheral nerve stimulator was turned on, and the current was slowly increased to 1.0 mA with a pulse width of 0.2 ms. Presence and location of any motor responses were observed and recorded.

Results: All patients had easily elicited paresthesias. The site of first paresthesia was to the shoulder in 73% of patients. Only 30% of patients exhibited any motor response to electrical stimulation up to 1.0 mA. There was no relation between site of paresthesia and associated motor nerve response.     

A prospective, randomized evaluation of the effects of epidural needle rotation on the distribution of epidural block

We evaluated the effects of turning the tip of the Tuohy needle 45 degrees toward the operative side before threading the epidural catheter (45 degrees -rotation group, n = 24) as compared to a conventional insertion technique with the tip of the Tuohy needle oriented at 90 degrees cephalad (control group, n = 24) on the distribution of 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine with 10 microg sufentanil in 48 patients undergoing total hip replacement. The catheter was introduced 3 to 4 cm beyond the tip of the Tuohy needle. A blinded observer recorded sensory and motor blocks on both sides, quality of analgesia, and volumes of local anesthetic used during the first 48 h of patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Readiness to surgery required 21 +/- 6 min in the control group and 17 +/- 7 min in the 45 degree-rotation group (P > 0.50). The maximum sensory level reached on the operative side was T10 (T10-7) in the control group and T9 (T10-6) in the 45 degree-rotation group (P > 0.50); whereas the maximum sensory level reached on the nonoperative side was T10 (T12-9) in the control group and L3 (L5-T12) in the 45 degree-rotation group (P = 0.0005). Complete motor blockade of the operative limb was achieved earlier in the 45 degree-rotation than in the control group, and motor block of the nonoperative side was more intense in patients in the control group. Two-segment regression of sensory level on the surgical side was similar in the two groups, but occurred earlier on the nonoperative side in the 45 degree-rotation group (94 +/- 70 min) than in the control group (178 +/- 40 min) (P = 0.0005). Postoperative analgesia was similar in the 2 groups, but the 45 degree-rotation group consumed less local anesthetic (242 +/- 35 mL) than the control group (297 +/- 60 mL) (P = 0.0005). We conclude that the rotation of the Tuohy introducer needle 45 degrees toward the operative side before threading the epidural catheter provides a preferential distribution of sensory and motor block toward the operative side, reducing the volume of local anesthetic solution required to maintain postoperative analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: Turning the Tuohy introducer needle 45 degrees toward the operative side before threading the epidural catheter is a simple maneuver that produces a preferential distribution of epidural anesthesia and analgesia toward the operative side, minimizing the volume of local anesthetic required to provide adequate pain relief after total hip arthroplasty.     

Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for orthopaedic surgery in the elderly]

The pros and cons as to which anesthesia is more beneficial, either spinal or epidural, prompted us to perform combined spinal and epidural block in the elderly undergoing lower limb surgery. The selected epidural space was entered with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle and a longer 26-gauge spinal needle was passed through it and into the subarachnoid space. Following the injection of required dose of 2% preservative-free lidocaine (isobaric), spinal needle was withdrawn and an epidural catheter was inserted. We could use this combined technique on 17 patients older than 80 yr (mean age; 84.5 +/- 3.9 years) with satisfactory results and without any serious cardiovascular change, as with 17 middle-aged patients (57.5 +/- 5.2 years). This combination of techniques provides a rapid onset and reliability of spinal block with high quality analgesia by supplementation through the epidural catheter during and after surgery. In the orthopaedic procedures on the lower limbs, combined spinal and epidural block is more useful even for the elderly over the age of 80 yr than spinal or epidural anesthesia alone.     

Extradural and subarachnoid catheterization using the Seldinger technique

The Seldinger technique was developed using a plastic introducer through which introduction and manipulations of a silicone spinal catheter, an extradural stimulation lead or a small diameter fibreoptic scope are possible without the risk of damage to the vulnerable devices. It is not intended as a replacement of the standard technique of introducing a spinal catheter through a Tuohy needle in general anaesthetic practice. Silicone spinal catheters and stimulation leads are used for long-term therapy in intractable chronic pain and spasticity. A fibreoptic scope is used for endoscopic examination of the subarachnoid or extradural space. Using a standard Tuohy needle the soft silicone extradural lead can be damaged easily by manipulations during insertion. For this reason the manufacturer modified the Tuohy needle for extradural silicone lead introduction. The disadvantages of this modified Tuohy needle are: first, difficulty in localization of the extradural space, second, the needle is unsuitable for a subarachnoid catheter or introduction of a fibreoptic scope. The Seldinger technique was performed 25 times in 18 patients, introducing a spinal silicone catheter (n = 14), an extradural silicone stimulation lead (n = 2) or a small diameter fibreoptic endoscope (n = 9). Paraesthesiae caused by neural irritation occurred in awake patients. This did not differ from the technique using a Tuohy needle only. Neural damage or trauma did not occur with the Seldinger technique. The incidence of post-spinal headache was the same for both techniques. No further complications were noted.      

Epidural bolus injection with alkalinized lidocaine improves blockade of the first sacral segment — a brief report

PURPOSE: It has been reported that the addition of epinephrine and/or bicarbonate to local anesthetic enhances the depth of epidural blockade and that initial partial bolus injection results in greater caudal spread. We evaluated the anesthetic effects of lidocaine with epinephrine and/or bicarbonate injected into the epidural space by bolus or catheter injection. METHODS: Forty-four patients undergoing epidural anesthesia with 17 mL of 2% lidocaine containing 1:200,000 epinephrine at L4-5 or L5-S1 were randomly divided into four groups. Lidocaine was administrated via epidural catheter [lidocaine catheter (LC) group] or Tuohy needle (lidocaine bolus group), lidocaine-bicarbonate was administrated via catheter (lidocaine-bicarbonate catheter group) or needle [lidocaine-bicarbonate bolus (LBB) group]. Pain threshold after repeated electrical stimulation was performed at L2 and S1 regions. Motor blockade was evaluated using the Bromage scale. Sympathetic blockade was assessed with plethysmographic waveforms from the toe. RESULTS: The pain threshold of the S1 dermatome in LBB group was significantly higher than in the lidocaine only groups, however, differences in the pain threshold at the L2 dermatome among the groups were insignificant. The onset of sensory blockade in the S1 dermatome in the LBB group was significantly shorter than in the LC group. Significantly greater motor blockade was achieved in the lidocaine-bicarbonate groups than in the lidocaine-only groups. The amplitude of plethysmographic waveforms significantly increased within each group. CONCLUSION: Epidural bolus injection of lidocaine-bicarbonate with epinephrine improves the pain threshold and speeds the onset of the blockade of the first sacral region.