Incidence of tooth loss and dental caries in 60-, 70- and 80-year-old Swedish individuals

Abstract The retention of natural teeth among the elderly is increasing and, in recent studies, dental caries has been identified as the main reason for teeth being extracted. The 5-year incidence of tooth loss and dental caries and the most crucial dental factors for tooth extraction were studied in a random sample of 60-. 70- and 80-year-old inhabitants of Gothenburg, Of the 208 persons examined at baseline, 148 (71%) participated in the follow-up examination: 69, 51 and 28 respectively in the different age groups. In all. 110 teeth had been extracted during the period in 40% of the participants. Only 9 persons had lost three or more teeth. The mean numbers of remaining teeth were 22, 18 and 15 respectively in the 60-, 70- and 80-year age groups and the mean numbers of teeth lost during the 5-year period increased with age from 0.4 in the 60-year-olds to 0.8 and 1.4 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (P<0.05). The major reason for tooth extraction was dental caries and it was found in 60% of all cases and at a higher rate of 77%i in the oldest age group. Fifty-one per cent had developed new coronal carious lesions and 61% had new root carious lesions, while 27% had not developed caries during the period. The mean 5-year increment in decayed and filled coronal surfaces increased with age from 2.3 in the 60-year-olds to 3.7 and 5.3 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (N.S.). The increment in decayed and filled root surfaces was higher in women than men, 3.4 compared with 1.8 (N.S.), which also increased with age from 1.4 in the 60-year-olds to 2.4 and 5.5 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (P<0.0001). It was concluded from this study that few teeth had been lost during the 5-year period but that dental caries still appeared to be a serious problem among some very elderly people.     

Ten-year incidence of dental caries in adult and elderly Chinese

Only very few longitudinal studies on dental caries are available in adults and elderly. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to describe the patterns of lesion progression in a group of adult and elderly Chinese followed over a 10-year period of time. In 1984, 587 persons aged 20-80 years were examined and by 1994, 440 of these were still available and re-examined by the same two examiners. All restorations, periodontal conditions and dental caries were recorded for all teeth and surfaces. Only caries data are reported here. Dental caries on coronal surfaces was classified as sound, non-cavitated, cavitated without or with pulp involvement or filled. On root surfaces, lesions were classified as sound, active caries or restored. Prior to analysis of the data, a series of drop-out analyses was carried out showing that most of the drop-outs were above 60 years of age at baseline, and death of participants was the major drop-out reason. A total of 2,114 teeth were lost, 36% of which had a deep dentin lesion at baseline. The distribution of persons according to number of new lesions/restorations over 10 years was highly skewed in all age groups, the prevalence increasing with age. Molars had the highest risk of becoming carious/restored over the 10-year period, and a remarkably low proportion of teeth had the same caries diagnosis after 10 years, indicative of lesion progression. When comparing the 1984 DFT/DMFT with the figures for 1994, there were no statistically significant differences indicating that the period and cohort effects cancel out each other. There was a significant increase with age of the number of new DFT. It can be concluded that dental caries is a major health problem in contemporary adult and elderly Chinese populations, and that caries incidence increases with old age.     

Models for coronal caries and root fragments in an elderly population.

A random sample of 809 dentate, home-dwelling people 65 years of age or older participated in a study to determine the prevalence of dental diseases in the elderly. Part of the study investigated the determinants of coronal caries and root fragments in these older adults. Using a wide array of potentially explanatory variables available, logistic regression models were developed to identify relationships between these variables and coronal caries and root fragments. The variables with the most explanatory power in the coronal caries model were the presence of decayed root surfaces, lower salivary flow rate, lack of regular dental care and an interaction variable including race and a perception of financial well-being. When a subsequent model was created that did not include decayed root surfaces or root fragments as potential explanatory variables, an additional variable relating to self-perception of mouth appearance emerged. The strongest variables in the model for root fragments were episodic (vs. regular) dental visits, presence of root caries, lack of replacement for lost teeth, high levels of Streptococcus mutans and number of teeth present in the mouth.     

Dental caries prevalence and dental care utilization among the very old

BACKGROUND: This article reports on coronal and root caries prevalence and dental care utilization patterns of elderly Iowans aged 79 years or older. METHODS: The sample for this study was 449 people who were surviving members of the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study cohort originally recruited in 1981. The authors focused their analyses on the 342 of these who were dentate. Examinations were conducted in subjects' homes by trained and calibrated examiners, using a halogen headlight, a mouth mirror, a color-coded periodontal probe and a no. 23 explorer. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 85.1 years (range 79-101 years), and they had a mean of 19.4 remaining teeth. Nearly all subjects (96 percent) had coronal decay experience, while 23 percent of the subjects had untreated coronal decay, about one-fourth of which was recurrent. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of the sample had root caries experience, with 23 percent having untreated root caries. Utilization of dental services was high among the dentate elderly, with nearly three-quarters reporting having visited a dentist within the past year. Nearly all reported that they paid for dental care themselves with no third-party coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study of the very old suggest that coronal and root caries remain prevalent, with high levels of dental care utilization among those who have retained natural teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: As the U.S. population ages, and more teeth are retained, demand for dental services in the population of the oldest elderly people is likely to increase.     

Tooth mortality in an adult rural population in Kenya

This paper reports on the pattern of tooth loss in a random sample of 1131 adults aged from 15 to 65 years in a rural area of Kenya in which access to formal dental care is minimal. We found that the majority of the population retained most of their dentition in a functional state even up to the age of 65 years: In all age groups, more than 50% had at least 26 teeth present, and more than 90% had at least 16 teeth present. The prevalence of edentulousness was less than 0.3%. The principal cause of tooth loss in all age groups was caries, and this was true for all tooth-types except incisors, for which periodontal disease was the main cause of tooth loss. The cultural practice of removing lower central incisors was observed only in those over 40 years of age. More teeth were lost due to caries among women than among men, while the reverse was true for teeth lost due to periodontal diseases. In view of the fact that most people retain most of their teeth throughout life, it is suggested that the most appropriate strategies for dental health care in this population should be those promoting self care, rather than the introduction of a formal treatment-oriented approach provided by dentists.     

Eighteen-month Coronal Caries Incidence in North Carolina Older Adults

In this longitudinal study of a random sample of North Carolinians over the age of 65 and living in their homes, 325 blacks and 280 whites were examined and interviewed 18 months after baseline examinations. Coronal caries incidence was greater among whites than blacks. The increment due to teeth becoming root fragments were similar for both races; however, there were more newly crowned teeth among whites. Newly crowned surfaces were not used as part of the caries increment in logistic regression models to investigate potential risk predictors. For blacks, caries development over the 18-month period was associated with a higher lactobacillus score and more coronal caries at baseline, more previously filled coronal surfaces, and lack of active membership in clubs or other groups. For whites, having no self-reported tooth sensitivity, having a lower socioeconomic index score, taking antihistamine medications at baseline, and having the perception of more problems after the age of 40 than before were all associated with the development of coronal caries.     

Twenty-four month coronal caries incidence: the role of dental care and race

OBJECTIVES: To describe for a diverse sample of dentate middle-aged and older adults: (1) the 24-month incidence of coronal caries, and (2) its association with a broad range of clinical, behavioral, financial, attitudinal, and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: The Florida Dental Care Study is a prospective observational longitudinal cohort study of 873 persons who at baseline had at least 1 tooth and were 45 years or older. In-person interviews and clinical examinations were conducted at baseline and 24 months, with 6-monthly telephone interviews between those times. A multinomial logistic regression was done to predict whether a participant was in one of four mutually exclusive groups at the 24-month examination (new decay only [NDO]; new filling(s) only [NFO]; both new decay and filling(s) [BOTH]; or neither [NONE]). RESULTS: Only 33% of the 24-month participants were in the NONE group. There was no significant difference in caries incidence between regular attenders and problem-oriented attenders, regardless of whether teeth crowned at baseline, incident crowns, or incident root fragments were excluded. However, once differences in incident tooth loss and baseline clinical, behavioral, financial, and attitudinal differences were taken into account, regular attenders did appear to benefit by developing fewer coronal lesions and fewer dental symptoms than problem-oriented attenders. Baseline carious surfaces, filled surfaces, number of teeth, and bulk restoration fractures predicted caries incidence, but baseline cusp fractures did not. Persons with negative dental attitudes were more likely to be in the NDO and BOTH groups, and negative attitude toward brushing and flossing (but not their frequency) also predicted caries incidence. CONCLUSION: Certain baseline clinical conditions, approach to dental care, ability to pay for dental care, dental attitudes, race, and age group were predictive of coronal caries incidence, and regular attenders appeared to benefit from regular attendance.     

Dental caries prevalence in early Polynesians from the Hawaiian Islands

We examined the skeletal remains of 1338 early Hawaiians (preserved in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu) to determine total caries and root surface caries prevalence. Specimens from seven islands were represented in the collection. Estimation of age at death was made by a combination of dental developmental staging for younger individuals and occlusal attrition and/or alveolar bone loss in adults. Museum records were also consulted for age estimation of adults which was primarily based on osteological criteria. The material was divided into six age groups. Predentate infants and edentulous adults were not included. A total of 19,425 teeth was examined. Caries lesions were observed in 462 individuals (34.5%) and 1895 teeth (9.8%). Coronal caries lesions in children and adolescents tended to be small and not particularly destructive of tooth structure. Root surface lesions in young adults were also small but increased progressively in size in the older groups, resulting in pulp exposure and coronal amputation. Although coronal caries was apparently not a significant dental health problem in children and young adults (compared with contemporary Hawaiians), root surface caries was an increasingly important source of tooth morbidity and tooth mortality in the older population groups. This age-related caries pattern was similar for all of the islands.     

The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance

BACKGROUND: The biofilm that forms and remains on tooth surfaces is the main etiological factor in caries and periodontal disease. Prevention of caries and periodontal disease must be based on means that counteract this bacterial plaque. OBJECTIVE: To monitor the incidence of tooth loss, caries and attachment loss during a 30-year period in a group of adults who maintained a carefully managed plaque control program. In addition, a comparison was made regarding the oral health status of individuals who, in 1972 and 2002, were 51-65 years old. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 1971 and 1972, more than 550 subjects were recruited. Three hundred and seventy-five subjects formed a test group and 180 a control group. After 6 years of monitoring, the control group was discontinued but the participants in the test group was maintained in the preventive program and was finally re-examined after 30 years. The following variables were studied at Baseline and after 3, 6, 15 and 30 years: plaque, caries, probing pocket depth, probing attachment level and CPITN. Each patient was given a detailed case presentation and education in self-diagnosis. Once every 2 months during the first 2 years, once every 3-12 months during years 3-30, the participants received, on an individual need basis, additional education in self-diagnosis and self-care focused on proper plaque control measures, including the use of toothbrushes and interdental cleaning devices (brush, dental tape, toothpick). The prophylactic sessions that were handled by a dental hygienist also included (i) plaque disclosure and (ii) professional mechanical tooth cleaning including the use of a fluoride-containing dentifrice/paste. RESULTS: Few teeth were lost during the 30 years of maintenance; 0.4-1.8 in different age cohorts. The main reason for tooth loss was root fracture; only 21 teeth were lost because of progressive periodontitis or caries. The mean number of new caries lesions was 1.2, 1.7 and 2.1 in the three groups. About 80% of the lesions were classified as recurrent caries. Most sites, buccal sites being the exception, exhibited no sign of attachment loss. Further, on approximal surfaces there was some gain of attachment between 1972 and 2002 in all age groups. CONCLUSION: The present study reported on the 30-year outcome of preventive dental treatment in a group of carefully monitored subjects who on a regular basis were encouraged, but also enjoyed and recognized the benefit of, maintaining a high standard of oral hygiene. The incidence of caries and periodontal disease as well as tooth mortality in this subject sample was very small. Since all preventive and treatment efforts during the 30 years were delivered in one private dental office, caution must be exercised when comparisons are made with longitudinal studies that present oral disease data from randomly selected subject samples.     

Caries prevalence in Dutch elderly people

In 1986 a nationwide oral survey was carried out in the Netherlands. One of the aims of this study was to assess the prevalence of oral diseases in adults. The present paper describes the prevalence of coronal and root caries in elderly Dutch subjects (45-74 years). The oldest age group (65-74 years) had, on average, the least number of teeth remaining; the posterior oral segment contained fewer teeth than the anterior segment. The anterior segment had the higher percentage of teeth with coronal caries and the posterior segment a higher percentage of filled teeth. The reverse was the case for root caries; a higher percentage of teeth had root caries in the posterior segment and the anterior segment a higher percentage of filled teeth.     

Pattern of dental caries in an adult rural population

A study was conducted amongst 1,131 randomly selected persons aged 15-65 years in a rural area of Kenya, having minimal access to dental care. A relatively low prevalence of frank cavitation was found in the 15- to 24-year-old cohort, but in the older age groups over 80% were so affected. Caries in the youngest cohort was characterized by a predominance of enamel lesions. At the age of 25-34 years, however, involvement of pulpal tissues and loss of teeth due to caries was more common, and this age group exhibited the largest number of dentinal lesions. The 35- to 44-year-old cohort exhibited fewer enamel and dentinal lesions, but more pulpally involved lesions and more extracted teeth. In the group aged 45-54 years, enamel and dentinal lesions were less common, and at the age of 55-65 years, such lesions were less common in comparison to their occurrence in younger cohorts. The 55- to 65-year cohort could generally be characterized as having larger numbers of root surface lesions, lesions involving the pulp, and extracted teeth. Root surface lesions were principally associated with age over 35 years. In all age groups caries exhibited a skewed distribution, most of the lesions occurring in a minority of individuals. This study demonstrates that caries activity continues throughout life and is not a phenomenon confined to any one period of life.     

Predictors of tooth loss over 10 years in adult and elderly Chinese

Abstract This study describes the incidence of tooth loss over a 10–year period in a population of rural Chinese, initially aged between 20 and 80 years. Among the 587 persons who participated in a baseline examination in 1984, 440 persons were available for a follow-up study in 1994. A total of 31 persons, mainly aged 50+ years at baseline, had become completely edentulous. Between 45% and 96% of the persons lost at least one tooth, and the average number of teeth lost ranged between 1.0 and 7.2. The distribution of the number of teeth lost was skew, indicating that a minor group of subjects had a substantially higher risk of tooth loss than the majority. Logistic regression analysis identified six significant predictors of tooth loss among those who remained dentate: age, a high number of teeth with dentinal caries lesions, a high number of teeth with caries lesions of any type, presence of teeth with attachment loss 7 mm, presence of mobile teeth, and a low percentage of sites with subgingival calculus deposits. At the subject level, caries variables and periodontal disease variables seemed equally important predictors of the incidence of tooth loss over 10 years, but at the tooth level caries was a predominant cause of tooth loss in all age groups.     

2005年广东省成年人恒牙根龋病抽样调查报告

目的 了解广东省35～44岁、 65～74岁人群恒牙根面龋病状况,为广东省口腔卫生保健工作提供信息支持.方法 采用多阶段分层等容量随机抽样的方法,抽取广东省35～44岁、 65～74岁城乡常住人口各720人,男女各半.按照《第三次全国口腔健康流行病学调查方案》中临床检查牙列状况的检查方法和标准,使用CPI探针检查全口恒牙根面龋病情况.数据采用SAS 8.1软件统计,计算出患龋率、龋均.结果 35～44岁组根面患龋率为31.53%、龋均为0.68;残根率为22.92%.65～74岁组根面患龋率为64.03%、龋均为2.67;残根率为52.64%.患龋率和龋均均为女性高于男性,农村高于城市.结论 广东省成年人受根面龋病患病率高,涉及面广,特别是老年人根面龋病增加迅速,大部分根面龋齿未得到治疗.     

Reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Greece: a five-year follow-up study

Aim: To investigate the reasons for tooth extraction and their correlations with age and gender in Greece. Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 1,018 patients, 560 males and 458 females, aged 18–74 years from a private practice in Greece. Each patient’s age, gender, number of extracted teeth and the reasons for the extraction were recorded for a period of 5 years. Results: Two thousand four hundred and eighteen permanent teeth were extracted for various reasons during the study period. The results showed that the main reasons for extraction were caries (45.6%), periodontal disease (32.1%), failed root canal treatment (7.3%) and root fracture (4.4%). Caries was the main reason for extraction in patients up to 44 years old (64.7%), while periodontal disease was the main reason for extraction in patients over years of age (77.6%). Maxillary and mandibular 1st and 2nd molars, were the most frequently extracted teeth due to dental caries. Premolars of the mandible and maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were the most frequently extracted teeth due to periodontal disease. Conclusions: Although the targets of the WHO regarding the reduction of dental caries were accomplished, dental caries and periodontal disease are still the main reasons for tooth extraction regardless of the age of the patients.     

Dental Caries and Tooth Loss in Adolescents With Early-Onset Periodontitis

The aim of this study was to assess the caries experience and tooth loss over 6 years in subjects with early-onset periodontitis as compared to their matched controls, and to describe the characteristics of teeth lost during this period. A multi-stage probability sample representing 8th to 12th grade U.S. schoolchildren were screened during the 1986/1987 school year to identify subjects with early-onset periodontitis (cases). The examination included measuring the clinical attachment level, presence of caries and dental restorations, and tooth loss. A random sample of controls without earlyonset periodontitis were selected for a follow-up examination and were matched to cases on gender, race, age, and geographic location. A total of 266 subjects, with a mean age of 16 years at baseline, were examined during the 1992/1993 school year and were classified into localized (LJP) and generalized juvenile periodontitis (GJP), incidental attachment loss (IAL), and control groups. Whites had more caries experience than Blacks and Hispanics, but there were no significant differences in tooth loss between the ethnic groups. The LJP and the IAL groups, respectively, had higher and lower overall caries experience than the control group. The LJP group had a significantly higher number of missing teeth at follow-up, and exhibited more extensive tooth mortality during 6 years than the control group. The GJP group also showed more tooth loss than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. In the LJP, GJP, IAL, and control groups, respectively, 43%, 32%, 26%, and 18% of the subjects lost teeth over 6 years due to disease. The findings showed differences in caries activity between the early-onset periodontitis groups and a variation by race. The findings suggest that loss of periodontal support was the principal cause for tooth loss in the LJP and GJP groups, and that dental caries was the principal cause for tooth extraction in the IAL and the control groups. J Periodontol 1996;67:960–967.     

Tooth loss as related to dental caries and periodontal breakdown in adult Tanzanians

A total of 170 adults aged 30-69 yr from the Zanzibar and Pemba Islands (Tanzania) were examined for tooth loss, dental caries and loss of periodontal attachment. The cause of tooth loss was recorded from information given by the examinee to a Kiswahili-English interpreter. Dental caries were recorded according to the depth of the lesion, i.e. involving enamel, dentin or pulp, respectively. Loss of attachment was measured as the distance in mm from the CEJ to the bottom of the pocket. The most severely affected surface determined the state of the tooth. The mean number of teeth present ranged from 29.5 in the youngest to 23.9 in the oldest age group. The mean number of teeth missing due to dental caries ranged between 2.1 and 7.0 teeth, and exceeded by far tooth loss due to periodontal breakdown which was only observed in the two oldest age groups. In all age groups the molars were the teeth most frequently missing and also the teeth most frequently affected by dental caries. Although a substantial number of the teeth in the older age groups demonstrated an extensive loss of attachment only a few teeth, mainly mandibular incisors, were lost due to periodontal breakdown within the age range examined.     

Pattern of tooth loss in recipients of free dental treatment at the University Hospital of Amman, Jordan

The aim of this study is to document reasons for tooth loss in disadvantaged Jordanians who seek free dental care at the University Hospital/Dental Clinics. A 4-year (1998-2001) prospective study was undertaken involving 2200 randomly selected patients from this subpopulation. Of their 3069 lost teeth, 46.9% were lost due to caries and its sequel; 18% were lost because of periodontal disease; 8% were lost for a combination of caries and periodontal disease; 19.4% for pre-prosthetic reasons; 4% for orthodontic reasons; 2.8% for eruption problems and 0.7% due to trauma. Logistic regression analysis for reasons of tooth loss in this sector revealed that caries and its sequel was the predominant cause of tooth loss in patients 相似文献   

Do Root Lesions Tend to Develop in the Same People Who Develop Coronal Lesions?

Objectives : The three purposes of this study are to: (1) describe the relationship between the prevalence of coronal caries and root caries; (2) describe the relationship between the three-year incidence of coronal caries and root caries; and (3) if the two conditions are associated, develop a multiple regression model that identifies characteristics distinguishing people who had increments of both root caries and coronal caries from people who had increments of either coronal caries or root caries, or who had no new caries. Methods : Dental examinations and interviews were conducted in the homes of a randomly selected, stratified sample of people over the age of 65 years in five North Carolina counties. The relationships between coronal and root D and DF were analyzed through contingency table analyses, and ordinal logistic regression was used to identify characteristics that differentiated people who had both coronal and root D over the three years from people who had either coronal or root D and people who had no new disease. Results : Evidence of root and coronal caries in whites was much more likely to be in the form of fillings, while for blacks, it was more likely to be in the form of untreated decay. Prevalence rates of coronal and root D and DF were significantly associated for both blacks and whites. Incidence rates based on DF indicated that root and coronal caries were not associated in whites, but were associated in blacks. People more likely to experience both types of caries had more gingival recession at baseline, greater average attachment loss over the three years, and lactobacilli at baseline. In addition, the presence of Porphymonas gingivalis at three years was important for whites. Conclusion : It appears that coronal and root caries do tend to appear together in the same individuals, but fillings attenuate that relationship. The impact of dental treatment on the epidemiology of dental caries appears to be considerable and calls into question whether the F component of the caries index is related to disease as defined by epidemiologic criteria.     

Association between untreated caries and age, gender and dental attendance in adults

Abstract – The aim of the study was to examine the association between untreated caries on the crown and root of the tooth with the age, gender and dental attendance in a group of adult. Six general practitioners in the Greater Manchester area agreed to take part. Over a 6-week period they collected clinical and personal data on 270 of their adult patients. No association was found between the mean number of coronal surfaces with caries and age; however, there was more root caries in people over 55 yr. More recurrent caries associated with a restoration was diagnosed than primary caries. There were proportionally more female than male regular attenders, and once attendance has been taken into account there were no gender differences for either coronal or root caries. Both coronal and root caries were associated with attendance, with irregular attenders experiencing more. Irregular attenders were three and a half times more likely to have caries on the root surfaces than regular attenders.     

Prevalence of root and coronal caries in a noninstitutionalized older population

This paper describes the prevalence of coronal caries and root caries in a sample of 520 people representative of the noninstitutionalized, dentate population older than age 65 in two rural Iowa counties. The subjects were examined in their homes by trained dental examiners. All prevalence rates were age- and gender-adjusted. Both types of caries were prevalent in the population age 65 and older. If projections of increased numbers of older people and increased retention of teeth are reasonably accurate, caries in older populations may become a significantly greater dental problem, and increased prevention and treatment of caries will be needed for these people.