Phase I‐II trial of oral cyclophosphamide,prednisone and lenalidomide for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

This single institution, open label Phase I‐II dose escalation trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of lenalidomide (Revlimid®), cyclophosphamide and prednisone (CPR) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The maximal administered dose of CPR consisted of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² on day 1, 8, and 15, lenalidomide 25 mg on d 1–21 and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28‐d cycle. Between November 2007 and June 2009, 32 patients were entered in cohorts of three at three dose levels. The median age was 64 years, 59% were male, with a median two prior regimens. Responding patients could stay on treatment until progression. The full‐dose CPR regimen produced no dose‐limiting toxicity and was delivered for a median of 16 months (3·5–65 months) with acceptable safety and tolerance. The overall response rate (≥ partial response) was 94% at a median follow up of 28 months. The median progression‐free survival was 16·1 months [95% confidence interval (CI); 10·9–22·5 months], while the median overall survival was 27·6 months (95% CI; 16·8–36·6 months). Only the beta‐2 microglobulin level at protocol entry correlated with a better survival (P = 0·047). These observations compare favourably with other 2‐ and 3‐ drug combinations for relapsed/refractory myeloma, and suggest that CPR should be evaluated further in the setting of relapsed/refractory disease, or in newly diagnosed patients.     

Expanded safety experience with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Lenalidomide gained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone in June 2006. In April 2005, the FDA and patient advocacy groups requested an expanded access programme to both provide lenalidomide to patients likely to benefit and obtain additional safety information. Relapsed/refractory MM patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/d (days 1–21) and dexamethasone 40 mg/d (days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 of cycles 1–4; days 1–4 only from cycle 5 onwards), in 4-week cycles until disease progression, study drug discontinuation, or lenalidomide approval. Of the 1438 patients enrolled, ∼60% were male, median age was 64 years, and 61·7% had Durie-Salmon stage III disease. Median time on study was 15·4 weeks (range: 0·1–49·1) and median dose was 25 mg. The most common adverse events (AEs) were haematological (49%), gastrointestinal (59%), and fatigue (55%). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were haematological (45%), fatigue (10%), and pneumonia (7%). The most common serious AEs were pneumonia (8%), pyrexia (4%), and deep-vein thrombosis (3%). Primary cause of death was disease progression (10%). Safety data confirmed known AEs of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory MM.     

A systematic review of phase II trials of thalidomide/dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Thalidomide monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) has a response rate of 30%. The combination of thalidomide with dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) is expected to improve responses, but it is unknown if the combination increases the rate of adverse events. Here, we conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating Thal/Dex in relapsed/refractory MM. Twelve studies were included, comprising 451 patients. The response rate (CR and PR) was 46% (95% CI 42-51%). Therapy-related toxicity was comparable to thalidomide monotherapy and included somnolence (26%, 95% CI 22-31%), constipation (37%, 95% CI 32-42%) and peripheral neuropathy (27%, 95% CI 23-32%). Only venous thromboembolism appeared to occur more often with Thal/Dex (5%, 95% CI 3-8%). Thus, using Thal/Dex results in an improved response rate in relapsed/refractory MM, with a toxicity rate comparable to thalidomide monotherapy.     

Perifosine plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a Phase I Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium study

The combination of lenalidomide-dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Preclinical data showed that the Akt inhibitor, perifosine, sensitized MM cells to lenalidomide and dexamethasone, providing the rationale for this Phase I, multicentre, single-arm study to assess the safety and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of perifosine-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed and relapsed/refractory MM. Patients received escalating doses of perifosine 50-100 mg daily and lenalidomide 15-25 mg once daily on days 1-21 of each 28-d cycle, plus dexamethasone 20-40 mg weekly thereafter, as indicated. Thirty-two patients were enrolled across four dose cohorts. MTD was not reached, with 31 patients evaluable for safety/tolerability. The most common all-causality grade 1-2 adverse events were fatigue (48%) and diarrhoea (45%), and grade 3-4 neutropenia (26%), hypophosphataemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and leucopenia (13%). Among 30 evaluable patients, 73% (95% confidence interval, 57·5-89·2%) achieved a minimal response or better, including 50% with a partial response or better. Median progression-free survival was 10·8 months and median overall survival 30·6 months. Response was associated with phospho-Akt in pharmacodynamic studies. Perifosine-lenalidomide-dexamethasone was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in relapsed and relapsed/refractory MM.     

Low-dose lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination treatment in elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Objective: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose lenalidomide combined with dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM).

Methods: Thirty-two elderly patients with refractory and recurrent MM (median age: 64 years) were treated with low-dose lenalidomide (LD-R) combined with dexamethasone (D). LD-R (10?mg/d) was administered orally for 21 days and D (40?mg/d) was administered twice a day on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. The treatment lasted 2–8 28-day cycles.

Results: After two cycles, the complete, very good partial, and partial remission rates were 12.5% (4/32), 25.0% (8/32), and 34.4% (11/32), respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% (23/32). After a 24-month follow-up, 23 patients responded to therapy, three were in complete remission, four were stable, and 16 exhibited disease progression. In addition, median time-to-progression was 13 months. Observed side effects were hypodynamia, gastrointestinal reaction, peripheral neuritis, and mild hypocytosis.

Conclusion: Low-dose lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is an effective and safe treatment for relapsed and refractory MM in elderly patients.     

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is highly effective in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients but responses are short‐lived

Objectives: Bortezomib has proven to be effective as single agent in myeloma patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone in a cohort of multiple myeloma (MM) relapsed/refractory patients treated in a single center. Patients and Methods: In this single center study, 70 patients were treated with bortezomib alone (9) or in combination with dexamethasone (61). Results: Forty‐one patients (59%) achieved at least a partial response (PR), including 7% complete response (CR), 36% very good partial response (VGPR) reaching the best response within four cycles. The duration of response was significantly longer for patients achieving CR/VGPR than for those achieving PR (7.3 vs. 3.8 months, P = 0.03). Likewise, time to progression, time to alternative treatment, and treatment free interval were significantly better for patients obtaining CR/VGPR (6.8, 9.4, 6.5 months respectively) as compared with PR (4.9, 6.3, 2 months respectively). The only dose‐limiting toxicity was peripheral neuropathy (PN), which occurred in 38/70 patients (55%) and was of grade 3–4 in 12 (17%). PN led to a dose reduction or treatment discontinuation in 17 (24%) patients. Complete resolution or improvement of PN occurred in 29/38 (76%) after a median time of 100 d (range: 17–202). Conclusions: Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone is highly effective in relapsed/refractory MM producing an impressive rate of CR/VGPR, but responses are short‐lived.     

Phase 1 study of selinexor plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Selinexor, an oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, targets Exportin 1 (XPO1, also termed CRM1). Non-clinical studies support combining selinexor with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and corticosteroids to overcome resistance in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of twice-weekly selinexor in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (SKd) to determine maximum tolerated dose in patients with RRMM (N = 21), with an expansion cohort to assess activity in carfilzomib-refractory disease and identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). During dose escalation, there was one dose-limiting toxicity (cardiac failure). The RP2D of twice-weekly SKd was selinexor 60 mg, carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m² and dexamethasone 20 mg. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events included thrombocytopenia (71%), anaemia (33%), lymphopenia (33%), neutropenia (33%) and infections (24%). Rates of ≥minimal response, ≥partial response and very good partial response were 71%, 48% and 14%, respectively; similar response outcomes were observed for dual-class refractory (PI and immunomodulatory drug)/quad-exposed (carfilzomib, bortezomib, lenalidomide and pomalidomide) patients (n = 17), and patients refractory to carfilzomib in last line of therapy (n = 13). Median progression-free survival was 3·7 months, and overall survival was 22·4 months in the overall population. SKd was tolerable and re-established disease control in RRMM patients, including carfilzomib-refractory patients. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02199665)     

Daratumumab in high-risk relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: adverse effect of chromosome 1q21 gain/amplification and GEP70 status on outcome

Gain of chromosome 1q21 and the gene expression-based GEP70 risk score are established prognostic markers for newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients. Here we addressed the prognostic impact of these two markers in 81 relapsed/refractory (RR) MM patients treated with the CD38-antibody daratumumab. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for 1q21 was performed at initial presentation, while the GEP70 score was determined at initial presentation and prior to daratumumab treatment. While the GEP70 at initial presentation showed a trend for inferior survival, the GEP70 collected prior to daratumumab treatment was significantly associated with poor outcome (P < 0·05). The worst outcome was seen for patients who were positive for gain(1q) and classified as GEP70 high risk prior to daratumumab [progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 0·3 years (95% CI: 0·15–1·4 years) and 0·8 years (95% CI: 0·5–1·9 years) respectively], while the median PFS and OS were not reached by patients without gain(1q) and GEP70 low-risk status. In conclusion, gain(1q) and the GEP70 are powerful prognostic markers for RR MM patients treated with daratumumab, and patients classified as high risk according to these markers experience shorter treatment response.     

Elotuzumab in combination with thalidomide and low‐dose dexamethasone: a phase 2 single‐arm safety study in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Elotuzumab is an immunostimulatory, humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that selectively targets and kills signalling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7–expressing myeloma cells. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of elotuzumab 10 mg/kg combined with thalidomide 50–200 mg and dexamethasone 40 mg (with/without cyclophosphamide 50 mg) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The primary endpoint was the proportion of grade ≥3 non‐haematological adverse events (AEs); other endpoints included the number of dose reductions/discontinuations and efficacy. Forty patients were treated, who had a median of three previous therapies, including bortezomib (98%) and lenalidomide (73%). Grade ≥3 non‐haematological AEs were reported in 63% of patients, most commonly asthenia (35%) and peripheral oedema (25%). Six (15%) patients had an infusion reaction. Twenty‐six (65%) patients had ≥1 dose reduction/discontinuation due to an AE, none related to elotuzumab. Overall response rate was 38%; median progression‐free survival was 3·9 months. Median overall survival was 16·3 months and the 1‐year survival rate was 63%. Minimal incremental toxicity was observed with addition of elotuzumab to thalidomide/dexamethasone with or without cyclophosphamide, and efficacy data suggest clinical benefit in a highly pre‐treated population. Elotuzumab combined with thalidomide may provide an additional treatment option for patients with RRMM.     

Salvage treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: clinical results and effects on microenvironment and neo-angiogenic biomarkers

Background

Preclinical studies have highlighted the activity of lenalidomide in mantle cell lymphoma and its anti-proliferative synergy with dexamethasone.

Design and Methods

In this prospective, multicenter, phase II study, patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma who were not eligible for, or had relapsed after, intensive treatments received lenalidomide 25 mg/day (days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle) and dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) for up to 12 months.

Results

The primary end-points, overall and complete response rates, were achieved by 17 of 33 (52%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 35–68%) and 8 of 33 patients (24%; 95% CI, 13–41%), respectively, by the end of treatment. Fifteen patients (45%) discontinued treatment prematurely, 13 due to lack of response. The median progression-free and overall survival were 12 months (95% CI, 5–19 months) and 20 months (95% CI, 12 months to not estimable), respectively. Treatment resulted in a significant increase in microvessel density (P=0.033) and non-significant increases in macrophage and natural killer cell counts, while serum levels of neoangiogenic factors did not change significantly. Grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (53%), leukopenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (22%), infections (12%), and febrile neutropenia (12%).

Conclusions

These results confirm a favorable safety and activity profile of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. The contribution of dexamethasone in achieving these results is unclear because of its possible detrimental effect on the immune activation generated by lenalidomide and a higher risk of developing infectious complications. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00786851).     

Efficacy and safety of low‐dose lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory POEMS syndrome

Although autologous stem cell transplantation or melphalan‐based chemotherapy has significantly improved the prognosis of POEMS syndrome, a few patients will relapse or be refractory to primary therapy, and there is a lack of studies regarding these patients. In this study, we used low‐dose lenalidomide (10 mg daily) and dexamethasone (40 mg, once weekly) to treat twelve patients with relapsed (n = 8) or refractory (n = 4) POEMS syndrome. After a median follow‐up time of 20 months, the overall hematologic response rate was 77% with 44% having a complete response. Eight (67%) patients had neurological response, and the median overall neuropathy limitation scale score was reduced from 3 (range, 1–9) to 2 (range, 0–6). Serum vascular endothelial growth factor response rate was 91% and 46% of patients had normal serum VEGF levels. One patient had progression of the disease 3 months after the end of treatment and subsequently died from the disease. Therefore, the estimated 2 year overall survival and progression‐free survival were 92%. The low‐dose lenalidomide and dexamethasone regimen was well tolerated, with no treatment‐related death or any grade 3 or 4 toxicity. In conclusion, low‐dose lenalidomide plus dexamethasone therapy is an effective and safe regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory POEMS syndrome.     

A comparison of lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide/lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Novel agents are considered standard components of induction therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. We retrospectively compared the results of three consecutive phase 2 clinical trials; RD (lenalidomide/dexamethasone, n = 34), CRD (cyclophosphamide/lenalidomide/dexamethasone, n = 53) and CyBorD (cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/dexamethasone, n = 63) (N = 150). Response rates after four cycles of treatment were: ≥near complete response (nCR), 12% vs. 2% vs. 41%, P < 0·0001 and very good partial response or better, 35% vs. 30% vs. 65%, P = 0·0003, respectively. With all cycles of therapy considered, ≥nCR was 35%, 15% and 41%, P = 0·006. However, there is no evidence that one regimen produced superior progression‐free survival (PFS) (median: 3·2 vs. 2·3 vs. 2·7 years, P = 0·11) or overall survival (3‐year: 88% vs. 79% vs. 88%, P = 0·23). Transplantation did not impact PFS (median: 2·7 vs. 2·3 years, P = 0·41) but was associated with improved OS (3‐year: 93% vs. 75%, P ≤ 0·001). High genetic risk patients (n = 40) had earlier relapse despite lenalidomide or bortezomib (median: 2·1 vs. 2·7 years, P = 0·45). Grade 3/4 toxicities were least with CyBorD while CRD had most toxicity. In conclusion, CyBorD demonstrated superior responses and less frequent serious toxicity but more neuropathy when compared to RD and CRD. Importantly, 80% of patients treated with modern therapeutic approaches are alive at 4 years.     

Bortezomib in combination with intermediate-dose dexamethasone and continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide for relapsed multiple myeloma

A phase 2 trial was performed to study the combination of bortezomib (VELCADE) with intermediate-dose dexamethasone (DEX), and continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide (CY) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Fifty-four patients with advanced MM were enroled to receive eight 3-week treatment cycles with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, followed by three 5-week cycles with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Within all cycles, DEX 20 mg/d was given orally on the day of bortezomib injection and the day thereafter. In addition, patients received CY continuous oral treatment at a dose of 50 mg/d p.o. once daily. Fifty patients completing at least one treatment cycle were evaluable for response. Complete, partial, and minor responses occurred in 16%, 66% and 8% of patients, respectively; overall response rate 90% (efficacy analysis). Median event-free survival was 12 months, with a median overall survival of 22 months. Adverse events (AE) of grades 3 or 4 occurring in at least 10% of patients comprised leucopenia, infection, herpes zoster, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy and fatigue. Bortezomib combined with DEX and CY is a highly effective treatment for relapsed MM at an acceptable rate of grade 3/4 AE. Antiviral prophylaxis appears to be mandatory.     

Phase 2 study of arsenic trioxide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Despite aggressive and innovative therapy, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) invariably relapse and die of their disease. New options for non-cytotoxic salvage therapy and additional therapeutic strategies are needed. Arsenic trioxide, an antitumour agent with a multifaceted mechanism of action, induces apoptosis in vitro in MM cell lines and freshly isolated cells from MM patients and, in preliminary studies, displayed clinical activity in patients with late-stage MM. A phase 2, multicentre, open-label study of arsenic trioxide was conducted in 24 MM patients; eight had relapsed and 16 were refractory to prior therapy. Patients received arsenic trioxide 0.25 mg/kg/d for 5 d/week during the first 2 weeks of each 4-week cycle. Sixteen patients had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and one required antibiotics. Reductions (25% or more) in serum M-protein levels occurred in eight of 24 (33%) patients. An additional six (25%) patients had stable disease. The median time to response was 67.5 d, with a median duration of response of 130 d. Arsenic trioxide therapy lowered serum creatinine levels in two patients with high baseline values. These data indicate that arsenic trioxide is active and reasonably well tolerated as a single-agent salvage therapy, even in patients with late-stage, relapsed and refractory MM.