Ictal head turning in frontal and temporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate the difference of ictal head turning movements between patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE). Methods: We investigated 38 seizures of 31 patients with unilateral TLE and 22 seizures of 14 patients with unilateral FLE where head turning occurred in the seizure evolution. The head movements were defined as ipsilateral or contralateral in reference to the lateralization of the patient’s focal epilepsy syndrome. Head movements were quantified by either referencing the head position with manually placed markers or by automatic detection of infrared marked reference points. The time of onset, duration, and angular speed of the head movements were computed, and interindividual and intraindividual analyses were performed. Key Findings: All of the TLE seizures had both contralateral and ipsilateral head turning, whereas all FLE had contralateral head turning; only 6 of 22 seizures were associated with ipsilateral head turning. Ipsilateral head turning always preceded contralateral head turning in both TLE and FLE. The head turning occurred significantly sooner after clinical seizure onset in FLE than in TLE patients (ipsilateral 0.5 vs. 16.0 s, contralateral: 4.5 vs. 21.3 s; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the duration of head turning was shorter in FLE for contralateral head turning (4.1 s) than in TLE (contralateral 6.0 s, p < 0.01); the ipsilateral head turning in the two groups did not differ (3.0 vs. 2.9 s) in duration. The angular speed of head turning did not differ for ipsilateral and for contralateral head turning in FLE and TLE. Significance: Quantitative analysis of head turning demonstrates significant differences between patients with FLE and TLE. These differences likely represent differences in spread of epileptic activity. This information may be useful in the seizure evaluation of patients considered for resective epilepsy surgery.     

Spatiotemporal relationship between seizure activity and interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the spatio-temporal relationship between seizure propagation and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in patients with bitemporal epilepsy. METHODS: We investigated 18 adult patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who had undergone continuous video-EEG monitoring during presurgical evaluation. Only those patients were selected who had independent IEDs over both temporal lobes. Two authors evaluated the ictal and interictal EEG data independently. RESULTS: We analyzed 52 lateralized seizures of 18 patients. Thirty-one seizures showed ipsilateral seizure spread exclusively, whereas in 21 seizures the contralateral hemisphere was also involved. In lateralized seizures without contralateral propagation, we found that spikes ipsilateral to the seizure onset occurred postictally in a greater ratio than preictally (P<0.001). In lateralized seizures with contralateral propagation, we found no significant changes in the postictal spike distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the lateralization of IEDs may depend on the brain areas involved by the preceding seizures, suggesting that spikes can be influenced by the seizure activity, and are not independent signs of epileptogenicity.     

Lateralizing value of postictal automatisms in temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: To describe clinical characteristics and lateralizing value of postictal automatisms in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHODS: One hundred and ninety-three videotaped seizures of 55 consecutive patients with refractory TLE and postoperatively seizure-free outcome were analyzed. Ictal as well as postictal (manual, oral and speech) automatisms were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-four (62%) of the 55 patients showed PA at least once during their seizures. Postictal automatism was observed in 70 (36%) attacks as manual (21%), oral (13%) or speech (9%) automatisms. Fifteen seizures contained a combination of two different postictal automatisms. The presence of postictal oral automatisms did not lateralize the seizure onset zone (p=0.834). Speech automatisms (repetitive verbal behavior) occurred more frequently after left-sided seizures (p=0.002). Postictal unilateral manual automatism showed no lateralizing value occurring by the ipsilateral hand in 10 and the contralateral upper limb in 6 seizures (p=0.454). CONCLUSION: : Postictal automatism is a relatively frequent phenomenon in TLE. Postictal speech automatism lateralizes the seizure onset zone to the left hemisphere. Our observation can help the presurgical evaluation of TLE because verbal perseveration frequently occurs spontaneously, even in seizures without appropriate postictal language testing.     

Semiology of Temporal Lobe Seizures: Value in Lateralizing the Seizure Focus

Summary: Purpose: To determine the lateralizing value of the clinical manifestations of seizures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we made a retrospective videotape analysis of complex partial seizures (CPS) in 55 patients who underwent temporal lobectomy and were seizure-free postopera-tively for >2 years. Methods: Blinded to clinical details, we reviewed videotapes from video-EEG telemetry monitoring with attention paid to seizure semiology. Results: Useful lateralizing features included unilateral clonic activity (with the seizure focus contralateral in all patients), unilateral dystonic or tonic posturing (with the seizure focus contralateral in 90 and 86%, respectively), unilateral automatisms (with the seizure focus ipsilateral in 80%), and ictal speech preservation (with the seizure focus contralateral to the language-dominant hemisphere in 80%). Versive head rotation occurring ≤10 s before seizures secondarily generalized consistently predicted a contralateral focus. Seizure manifestations less predictive but suggestive of lateralization included ictal speech arrest and postictal speech status, with predictive values of 67%. Seizure manifestations not providing reliable lateralizing information included eye deviation, type of aura, and versive head movements occurring at times other than immediately before seizures secondarily generalized. Conclusions: In TLE, several clinical seizure manifestations are useful in lateralizing the seizure focus, although some provide no reliable information. Therefore, ictal semiology can assist in the evaluation of patients for seizure surgery, providing additional information in the lateralization of TLE.     

Lateralized ictal immobility of the upper limb in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

The primary aim of this study was to establish the incidence and the lateralizing value of 'lateralized ictal immobility of the upper limb' (LIL) in patients suffering from temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and to describe the connection between LIL and other clinical ictal signs. We retrospectively reviewed video records of 87 patients with TLE. We reviewed a total of 276 focal epileptic seizures with or without secondary generalization. We studied the incidence of LIL, its lateralizing value, and its relationship to other ictal clinical signs. Of the 87 patients, 49 had undergone a successful resective surgery at least 1 year prior to the study. LIL is a late sign in the course of partial seizure. It occurred in 25 of our 87 patients (28.7%), and in 47 of 276 seizures (17.1%). In all of the evaluated seizures, LIL occurred contralateral to the side of seizure onset (P < 0.001). LIL was always associated with ipsilateral upper limb automatisms, and in 63.1% of the occurrences, it was immediately followed by ictal dystonia. LIL is a more accurate term to describe what has previously been called 'ictal paresis' in the literature. Due to the inability to execute proper testing during a partial seizure, it is better to use the term LIL when making a visual analysis of a seizure. LIL is a more suitable term to describe the studied ictal sign. It is a relatively frequent sign in patients with TLE. LIL has an excellent lateralizing value for the contralateral hemisphere. It is a negative motor sign, and its genesis is probably associated with the epileptic involvement of the contralateral frontal lobe.     

Interictal EEG and ictal scalp EEG propagation are highly predictive of surgical outcome in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: Surgical outcome in patients with mesial temporal lobe sclerosis (MTS) is worse than that in patients with temporal lobe activity (TLE) with tumors. Previous studies of the ictal EEG focused on ictal EEG onset in scalp EEG or ictal EEG propagation in invasive recordings. Ictal EEG propagation with scalp electrodes has not been reported. METHODS: Ictal scalp EEG propagation patterns were studied in 347 seizures of 58 patients with MTS or nonlesional TLE. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and the presence of unilateral mesial temporal lobe atrophy in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also were studied in these 58 patients. Forty-nine patients were operated on (minimal follow-up of 1 year). RESULTS: Postoperatively, seizure-free outcome was seen in (a) 82.8% of patients with regionalized EEG seizure without contralateral propagation, but in only 45.5% of patients with contralateral propagation (p = 0.007); (b) 84.6% of patients with 100% IED lateralized to one temporal lobe, but in only 52.2% with <100% unitemporal IED (p = 0.015); (c) 88.9% with 100% unitemporal IED and regionalized ictal EEG combined, 73.7% with one of both variables, and only 33.3% with <100% ipsitemporal IED combined with contralateral ictal EEG propagation (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Switch of lateralization or bitemporal asynchrony in the ictal scalp EEG and bitemporal IED are most probably an index of bitemporal epileptogenicity in MTS and are associated with a worse outcome.     

Electrode manipulation automatism during temporal lobe seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical characteristics and lateralizing value of peri-ictal electrode manipulation automatism (EMA) in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and compare our data with ictal manual automatisms described in the literature. METHODS: Two-hundred and five videotaped seizures of 55 consecutive patients with refractory TLE and postoperatively seizure-free outcome were analyzed and EMA (tugging, scratching or adjusting the electrodes and cables) were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (51%) patients showed EMA during 47 (23%) seizures. Ictal start was noted in 22 seizures and in 19/22 cases EMA finished before the end of seizure. Ictal EMAs were always associated with automotor seizure components. During 25 seizures, exclusively postictal EMAs were observed. Electrode manipulation was presented during 24/112 left-sided and 23/93 right-sided seizures (p = 0.742). Peri-ictal EMA was unilateral (completed by one hand) in 24/47 seizures (10 ictal, 14 postictal); it was done by the hand ipsilateral to the seizure onset zone in 17/24 and by contralateral hand in 7/24 cases (p = 0.064). We observed concomitant contralateral dystonic posturing during 3/10 seizures with unilateral ictal EMA. Unilateral hand automatism, temporally independent from the EMA appeared in 30 (64%) of the 47 seizures. CONCLUSION: Peri-ictal EMA is a frequent phenomenon but shows no lateralizing value in TLE. The mechanism of EMA is in many ways dissimilar from that of earlier described manual automatisms.     

Typical and atypical perfusion patterns in periictal SPECT of patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: To characterize perfusion patterns of periictal single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) in patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and to determine their relationship to the epileptogenic zone (EZ). METHODS: We studied periictal SPECT scans of 53 patients after anterior mesial temporal lobectomy who had good seizure outcome after surgery. Ictal SPECT scans were performed during video-EEG monitoring. Typical SPECT patterns consisted of ipsilateral ictal hyperperfusion or ipsilateral postictal hypoperfusion. Atypical ictal patterns included normal scans, bilateral temporal hyperperfusion, or contralateral patterns. These perfusion patterns were retrospectively analyzed searching for concordance rate with the EZ. RESULTS: We obtained 51 ictal and two early postictal scans. In the typical group, 40 (75.4%) patients had ipsilateral ictal temporal lobe hyperperfusion, and one (1.9%) patient had ipsilateral postictal temporal lobe hypoperfusion. Twelve (22.7%) patients exhibited atypical perfusion patterns: seven (13.2%) patients had bitemporal ictal hyperperfusion (four cases showed asymmetric temporal lobe changes), four (7.6%) patients had contralateral hyperperfusion, and one (1.9%) patient had a normal SPECT scan. All four patients with bitemporal asymmetric hyperperfusions showed greater perfusion lateralized to the side of the EZ. Three of the four patients who had contralateral hyperperfusion also had a complex postictal-like pattern in the ipsilateral temporal lobe consisting of anteromesial hyperperfusion with adjacent lateral hypoperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: This study analyzed typical and atypical perfusion patterns in unilateral TLE, and suggested that not only typical, but also some atypical perfusion patterns may contribute to the lateralization of EZ.     

Ictal Contralateral Paresis in Complex Partial Seizures

Summary: Certain behaviors that occur during a complex partial seizure (CPS) are useful in lateralizing the side of seizure onset. In 5 (5.3%) of 94 consecutive patients with partial epilepsy, we observed ictal unilateral arm and hand paresis during 27 of 34 CPS. In all these seizures, this behavior occurred contralateral to an epileptogenic temporal lobe, as determined by video-EEG monitoring and surgical outcome. In 5 of the 27 seizures, an observer demonstrated that the paretic arm and hand were flaccid. None of these patients had postictal (Todd's) paralysis. In most of the seizures, the arm ipsilateral to seizure onset had simultaneous purposeful movements or automatisms, sometimes with awkward posturing. Ictal unilateral paresis is distinctly different from ictal dystonia or postictal paralysis and consistently lateralizes seizure onset to the contralateral temporal lobe. Recognition of this particular ictal behavior and comparison to other simultaneous behaviors can aid in the lateralization and possibly localization of the epileptogenic zone.     

Differentiation of Temporal Lobe Ictal Behavior Associated with Hippocampal Sclerosis and Tumors of Temporal Lobe

Summary: Ictal behavioral characteristics may reflect seizure spread patterns and provide a clue to seizure onset location, between or within specific cerebral lobes. Sequential symptomatology might therefore distinguish patients with hippocampal sclerosis from patients with temporal lobe tumors. To determine ictal behavioral differences in patients of these groups, we analyzed 145 seizures of 33 patients with hippocampal sclerosis (group I) and 79 seizures of 22 patients with temporal lobe tumors (group 11). First appearance of a variety of ictal behavioral characteristics was determined in three phases (first 5 s, 5–60 s, and from 60 s to mental clearing) for patients in both groups. Ipsilateral hand automatisms were significantly more frequent in the first 60 s in group I (p < 0.005). Onset of contralateral head turning was observed in the first 5 s only in group Il (p < 0.05). First appearance of leg automatisms in group I and of oral automatisms in group Il were very rare in phase 2 (p < 0.01, p < 0.005). Time of onset of other ictal behavioral characteristics and duration of seizures were not statistically different between the two groups. Ictal behavioral characteristics varied among and within patients and patient groups, but certain behavioral characteristics were helpful in differentiating these two groups of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients.     

Nonmanipulative proximal upper extremity automatisms lateralize contralaterally in temporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose : Upper extremity automatisms are considered to be an ipsilateral seizure lateralizing sign in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Herein we describe different types of contralateral upper extremity automatisms (CUEAs). Methods : One hundred ninety‐three video–(electroencephalography) EEG recordings of 59 patients were reviewed. Other than two patients who refused surgery, all patients underwent standardized temporal lobectomy with favorable postoperative outcome. Fifty‐seven seizures of 21 patients were selected with CUEAs. We evaluated their electroclinical characteristics and their relation to other lateralizing motor symptoms. Results : Two types of CUEAs were observed. Nonmanipulative, proximal upper extremity automatisms were seen unilaterally and contralaterally to the operated side. These automatisms were rhythmic; repetitive; and often occurred with a circulatory component resembling waving, flaunting, circling, or stirring movements. They occurred in 29 seizures (15%) of 11 patients (19%), in most seizures in the first half of the seizure, and never postictally, in various time sequences and combined with dystonic/tonic posturing or limb immobility. Manipulative/distal type of CUEAs occurred in 11 seizures (6%) of 7 patients (12%) on the unexpected contralateral side. These CUEAs were seen in all phases of the seizures, including in the postictal state. Discussion : Nonmanipulative unilateral proximal upper extremity automatism is a reliable lateralizing sign to the contralateral hemisphere in TLE. This sign may be pathophysiologically related to dystonic/tonic posturing. Manipulative distal automatisms have less lateralizing value.     

Association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing: a clinical feature differentiating medial from neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Clinical features that may help to differentiate medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) from neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy (NTLE) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the localizing and lateralizing value of the association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Videotapes of 60 patients with well-defined MTLE, NTLE, or both were reviewed to assess the presence and the localizing value of unilateral dystonic posturing associated with motor automatisms. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 60 patients exhibited unilateral dystonic posturing. This sign was observed in patients with MTLE and NTLE. It was mostly contralateral to the seizure focus in patients with MTLE and exclusively ipsilateral in patients with NTLE. Unilateral motor automatisms occurred in 26 of the 60 patients with MTLE or NTLE. It was predominantly ipsilateral to the seizure focus in patients with MTLE and exclusively contralateral in patients with NTLE. The association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing was found in 14 patients with MTLE but in none of the patients with NTLE. Two patients who had medial and neocortical seizure onset also exhibited this clinical feature. This association was not significantly correlated with the postoperative outcome in patients with MTLE. CONCLUSIONS: The association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing may help to differentiate MTLE from NTLE with a reliable lateralizing value. This clinical association may reflect a specific pattern in the spread of the ictal discharge.     

Ictal spitting in left temporal lobe epilepsy: report of three cases.

PURPOSE: Ictal spitting is rarely reported in patients with epilepsy. More often it is observed in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and is presumed to be a lateralizing sign to language nondominant hemisphere. We report three patients with left TLE who had ictal spitting registered during prolonged video-EEG monitoring. METHODS: Medical charts of all patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy submitted to prolonged video-EEG monitoring in the Epilepsy Unit at UNIFESP during a 3-year period were reviewed, in search of reports of ictal spitting. The clinical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging data of the identified patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Among 136 patients evaluated with prolonged video-EEG monitoring, three (2.2%) presented spitting automatisms during complex partial seizures. All of them were right-handed, and had clear signs of left hippocampal sclerosis on MRI. In two patients, in all seizures in which ictal spitting was observed, EEG seizure onset was seen in the left temporal lobe. In the third patient, ictal onset with scalp electrodes was observed in the right temporal lobe, but semi-invasive monitoring with foramen ovale electrodes revealed ictal onset in the left temporal lobe, confirming false lateralization in surface records. The three patients became seizure-free following left anterior temporal lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Ictal spitting is a rare finding in patients with epilepsy, and may be considered a localizing sign of seizure onset in the temporal lobe. It may be observed in seizures originating from the left temporal lobe, and thus should not be considered a lateralizing sign of nondominant TLE.     

Electrophysiology of Bimanual-Bipedal Automatisms

Summary: To determine the localizing value and electrophysiology of bimanual-bipedal automatisms (BBAs), we studied these behaviors in 54 seizures of 8 patients with temporal or frontal lobe seizure onset. BBAs occurred with a frequency of 27% in frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) and of 7% in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The distribution of electrode sites showing ictal activity during these automatisms was significantly different in the two patient groups (0.0001 Chi-square). Mesioand/or laterotemporal plus orbital frontal areas were involved areas when the behaviors appeared in patients with TLE; dorsolateral and mesiofrontal regions were the most commonly involved when the behaviors occurred during the course of frontal lobe seizures. We concluded that BBAs represent activation of frontal lobe circuitry but are not unique to seizures of frontal lobe origin. Eyelid flutter and repetitive body movements in either the axial or sagittal plane were significantly associated with the frontal lobe group whereas oral-alimentary automatisms were associated with the temporal lobe group. Thus, these associated behaviors may help indicate whether a frontal or temporal lobe seizure onset has occurred when BBAs are observed. A new concept of ictal expression is proposed to conform with the results as well as with other apparently disparate ictal behaviors that may have localizing value.     

Electroclinical analysis of postictal noserubbing

BACKGROUND: Postictal noserubbing (PIN) has been identified as a good, albeit imperfect, lateralizing and localizing sign in human partial epilepsy, possibly related to ictal autonomic activation. METHODS: PIN was studied prospectively in a group of consecutive patients admitted for video-EEG monitoring, with the laterality of noserubbing correlated with electrographic sites of seizure onset, intra- and interhemispheric spread, and sites of seizure termination. RESULTS: PIN was significantly more frequent in temporal than extratemporal epilepsy (p<0.001; 23/41 (56%) patients and 41/197 (21%) seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy compared with 4/34 (12%) patients and 12/167 (7%) seizures in extratemporal epilepsy). The hand used to rub the nose was ipsilateral to the side of seizure onset in 83% of both temporal and extratemporal seizures. Seizures with contralateral PIN correlated with spread to the contralateral temporal lobe on scalp EEG (p<0.04). All extratemporal seizures with PIN showed spread to temporal lobe structures. One patient investigated with intracranial electrodes showed PIN only when ictal activity spread to involve the amygdala: seizures confined to the hippocampus were not associated with PIN. PIN was not observed in 63 nonepileptic events in 17 patients. Unexpectedly, one patient with primary generalized epilepsy showed typical PIN after 1/3 recorded absence seizures. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms PIN as a good indicator of ipsilateral temporal lobe seizure onset. Instances of false lateralization and localization appear to reflect seizure spread to contralateral or ipsilateral temporal lobe structures, respectively. Involvement of the amygdala appears to be of prime importance for induction of PIN.     

Lateralisation value of lower limb behaviors in complex partial seizures of temporal lobe origin: a video-EEG analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the lateralising value of leg behaviors in complex partial seizures (CPS) of temporal lobe onset. METHODS: Videotapes of 123 seizures from 38 patients who were seizure-free after temporal lobectomy were reviewed. Ictal behaviors including head turning, limb automatisms, tonic/dystonic postures and the latent time for ictal behavior were analysed for their lateralising value. RESULTS: Contralateral versive head turning, ipsilateral arm automatisms, contralateral arm tonic/dystonic posturing, and contralateral arm clonic posturing were found to have high predictive value of lateralisation. As for the lower limbs, meaningful leg behaviors were recorded in 38 (31%) of 123 seizures, far less than behaviors of the upper limbs (79%). The predictive value from leg behaviors were similar to that from upper limbs. Among the leg behaviors, dystonic behaviors were always contralateral to the ictal side. Tonic behaviors were 94% contralateral to the ictal side. Dystonia and clonic movement were always contralateral to the ictal side. Automatisms were 86% ipsilateral to the ictal side. CONCLUSIONS: Although incidences were low, leg behaviors could provide useful lateralising value of the seizure foci. Clinicians as well as investigators should recognize the value of lower limbs behavior in studies of ictal semiology.     

The localizing value of the abdominal aura and its evolution: a study in focal epilepsies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the localizing value of abdominal aura and its evolution into other seizure types. METHODS: The seizures of 491 consecutive patients with focal epilepsies were prospectively classified according to a recently introduced semiologic seizure classification. All patients underwent prolonged EEG video monitoring and MRI scan. Two hundred twenty-three patients (45%) had temporal lobe epilepsies (TLE); 113 patients (23%) had extratemporal epilepsies; and for 155 (32%) patients, the epilepsy could not be localized to one lobe. RESULTS: Abdominal auras were more frequent with TLE (117 of 223 patients, 52%) than in extratemporal epilepsy (13 of 113 patients, 12%, p < 0.0001) and more frequent in mesial TLE (70 of 110 patients, 64%) than in neocortical TLE (16 of 41 patients, 39%, p = 0.007). No preponderance to one side existed. Abdominal auras were followed by ictal oral and manual automatisms (automotor seizure) in at least one seizure evolution in all patients with TLE (117 patients, 100%). In contrast, only two patients with extratemporal epilepsy (2 of 13 patients, 15%, p < 0.0001) had abdominal auras evolving into automotor seizures. An abdominal aura is associated with TLE with a probability of 73.6%. The evolution of an abdominal aura into an automotor seizure, however, increases the probability of TLE to 98.3%. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that evolution of abdominal aura into automotor seizure permits differentiation between temporal lobe epilepsy and extratemporal epilepsy, showing that analysis of seizure evolution provides more localizing information than does the frequency of particular seizure types.     

1H-MR spectroscopy indicates severity markers in temporal lobe epilepsy: correlations between metabolic alterations, seizures, and epileptic discharges in EEG

PURPOSE: In this study, hippocampal metabolite alterations in (1)H-MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) were correlated to the findings of intensive video-EEG monitoring and duration of seizure symptoms in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHODS: The 14 patients with mesial TLE and no pathological findings in imaging were investigated by (1)H-MRS. Seizures were analyzed by: number of clinical seizures in 24 h, exact duration of clinical symptoms in 24 h, frequency of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and ictal activity, duration of ictal activity, and IEDs occurring within 24 h in intensive EEG monitoring. Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) was calculated between spectral metabolite alterations and the parameters mentioned above. RESULTS: In the analysis, a negative correlation was found between total (t) NAA values and degree of IEDs in EEG (p = 0.04); a positive correlation was found between Cr levels and duration of seizure symptoms registered by video monitoring (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that, in some patients, (1)H-MRS is able to refer the severity of TLE. The degree of tNAA reduction in (1)H-MRS, probably indicating neuronal dysfunction, is associated with interictal spiking in intensive EEG monitoring. Duration of seizure symptoms associated with increased Cr peaks probably reflects increased gliosis.     

Lateralizing Value and Semiology of Ictal Limb Posturing and Version in Temporal Lobe and Extratemporal Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : Unilateral dystonic limb posturing in partial seizures has been shown to be an accurate lateralizing sign indicating seizure onset in the contralateral hemisphere. However, its clinical utility may be reduced by confusion with other lateralized ictal motor phenomena. In this study, the ictal phenomena of dystonic limb posturing, tonic limb posturing, unilateral immobile limb, and version were distinguished and examined in patients with temporal and extratemporal seizures.
Methods : Partial seizures in 54 patients, successfully treated by surgery (34 temporal, 20 extratemporal; 14 frontal, 3 parietal, and 3 occipital), were analyzed blindly by 3 reviewers. Interobserver agreement was tested with kappa indexes and positive predictive value (PPV) was determined for each sign.
Results : In patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), dystonic posturing occurred in 35.3% (kappa 0.78, positive predictive value (PPV) for the sign being contralateral to seizure onset 92%); tonic limb posturing occurred in 17.7% (kappa 0.36, PPV 40%); unilateral immobile limb occurred in 11.8% (kappa 0.23, PPV 100%); and version occurred in 35.3% (kappa 0.77, PPV 100%). In patients with extratemporal epilepsy, dystonic posturing occurred in 20.0% (kappa 0.31, PPV 100%); tonic limb posturing occurred in 15.0% (kappa 0.08, PPV 67%); and version occurred in 40.0% (kappa 0.54, PPV 100%). The higher kappa indexes were significant for dystonic posturing (p < 0.001) and tonic limb posturing (p = 0.032) in TLE. Dystonic posturing (p = 0.034), tonic posturing (p = 0.07), and version (p = 0.0038) occurred earlier in extratemporal seizures than in temporal seizures.
Conclusions : Of the limb ictal motor phenomena, only dystonic posturing was accurate and had good interobserver agreement.     

Lack of aura experience correlates with bitemporal dysfunction in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

The diagnostic value of lack of aura experience in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate possible factors of bitemporal dysfunction in patients with mesial TLE who did not experience an aura in electroencephalography EEG/video monitoring for epilepsy surgery. METHODS: Ictal scalp EEG propagation patterns of 347 seizures of 58 patients with mesial temporal lobe sclerosis or non-lesional mesial TLE, interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), presence of unilateral mesial temporal lobe sclerosis in visual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis, prose memory performance, history or not of an aura, and postictal memory or absence of an aura were analyzed. The ictal EEG was categorized as follows. EEG seizure: (a) remaining regionalized, (b) non-lateralized, (c) showing later switch of lateralization or bitemporal asynchronous ictal patterns. RESULTS: Absent aura in monitoring was significantly correlated with absence of unitemporal MRI sclerosis (P=0.004), bitemporal IED (P=0.008), and propagation of the ictal EEG to the contralateral temporal lobe (P=0.001). Other historical data and interictal prose memory performance were not significantly correlated with absent aura. Ten of 11 patients without aura in monitoring also had absent or rare auras in their history. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of aura experience strongly correlates with indicators of bitemporal dysfunction such as bitemporal interictal sharp waves and bitemporal ictal propagation in scalp EEG, and absence of lateralized MRI sclerosis in patients with mesial TLE. The fact that absent auras are not correlated with episodic memory suggests a transient memory deficit, probably because of rapid propagation to the contralateral mesial temporal lobe.