Involvement of the kappa-opioid receptor in the anxiogenic-like effect of CP 55,940 in male rats

We have studied the possible interaction between three selective opioid-receptor antagonists, nor-binaltorphimine (NB: kappa) (5 mg/kg), cyprodime (CY: mu) (10 mg/kg) and naltrindole (NTI: delta) (1 mg/kg), and the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940, in the modulation of anxiety (plus-maze) and adrenocortical activity (serum corticosterone levels by radioimmunoassay) in male rats. The holeboard was used to evaluate motor activity and directed exploration. CP 55,940 (75 microg/kg, but not 10 microg/kg) induced an anxiogenic-like effect, which was antagonised by NB. The other effects of CP 55,940 (75 microg/kg), a decreased holeboard activity and stimulation of adrenocortical activity, were not antagonised by any of the three opioid receptor antagonists. CY and NTI, when administered alone, induced marked reductions in motor activity, anxiogenic-like effects and stimulation of adrenocortical activity. The selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist NB, on its own, did not modify the level of anxiety but stimulated adrenocortical activity. We provide the first pharmacological evidence about the involvement of the kappa-opioid receptor in the anxiogenic-like effect of CP 55,940.     

Cannabinoid effects on anxiety-related behaviours and hypothalamic neurotransmitters

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of the cannabinoid agonist CP 55,940 and the antagonist SR 141716A, alone and in combination, on rat exploratory and anxiety-like behaviour in the holeboard and elevated plus-maze tests. A further aim was to evaluate the effects of these treatments on hypothalamic neurotransmitters. Animals treated with CP 55,940 doses of 0.125 and 0.1 mg/kg exhibited less exploration and an increase in anxiety-like behaviour accompanied by great motor inhibition. No hypoactivity was seen at 0.075 mg/kg dosage, but anxiety and neophobic responses persisted, indicating independent and specific effects. Motor activity effects induced by CP 55,940 were reversed by pretreatment with SR 141716A (3 mg/kg). Surprisingly, when administered on its own, the antagonist also induced a reduction in exploratory parameters and an increase in anxiety-like responses. These apparently similar effects might be caused by different neural mechanisms. Finally, CP 55,940 increased hypothalamic dopamine and serotonin levels. These increases might be involved in the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis described for cannabinoids.     

Co-administration of fluoxetine and WAY100635 improves short-term memory function

The aim of this study was to determine whether the action of the antidepressant fluoxetine or the anxiolytic buspirone could be modified by specific 5-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT(1A)) receptor blockade in a short-term memory paradigm. Male Wistar rats were trained to perform the putative short-term memory task, delayed non-matching to position. WAY100635, a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist (0.15 mg/kg), was administered 15 min before either the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (3 mg/kg), or the partial 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist and dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, buspirone (0.3 mg/kg). 8-Hydroxy-di-n-propylamino tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a full 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist (0.3 mg/kg), was also included in the study as a positive control. WAY100635 alone had no effect on any behavioural parameter measured (response accuracy, delay lever press activity and trial completion). 8-OH-DPAT impaired response accuracy in a delay-dependent manner, an effect reversed by WAY100635. Fluoxetine also impaired response accuracy delay-dependently. WAY100635 pretreatment not only reversed this deficit but improved response accuracy, in the presence of a significant deficit in trial completion. At the dose used, buspirone showed no significant differences compared to the control group. The data suggest that fluoxetine impairs short-term memory function by the indirect activation of 5-HT(1A) receptors, but that its co-administration with WAY100635 improves short-term memory function.     

Comparative effects of serotonergic agonists with varying efficacy at the 5-HT(1A) receptor on core body temperature: modification by the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY 100635.

A reduction in core body temperature is one of the characteristic consequences of 5-HT1A receptor activation in rodents. In this study, we characterized the hypothermic effects of four 5-HT1A receptor ligands with varying affinity and selectivity at the 5-HT1A receptor. 8-OH-DPAT and flesinoxan (full agonists); ipsapirone (selective partial agonist) and eltoprazine (non selective partial agonist), all induced a dose-dependent reduction in core body temperature, which was maximal 30 min subsequent to administration. This response differed quantitatively between the agonists, in both the extent and the duration of its effects. The selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (0.15 mg/kg), attenuated the hypothermia induced by the partial agonists, ipsapirone (10 mg/kg) and eltoprazine (10 mg/kg). In contrast, the higher dose of WAY 100635 (1 mg/kg) antagonized the effects of all agonists. This study therefore further confirms the utility of hypothermia as a simple, robust in-vivo probe of 5-HT1A receptor function. This paradigm, which was enhanced by use of specific antagonists such as WAY 100635, may prove useful for the detection and characterization of novel 5-HT1A receptor ligands.     

Antiaggresive and anxiolytic effects of gepirone in mice, and their attenuation by WAY 100635

The purpose of the investigation was to ascertain whether (a) the antiaggressive effects of the 5-HT1A partial agonist, Gepirone, could be mediated via its anxiolytic action; (b) the selective 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY 100635, reversed these effects, and (c) the modulation of "stress hyperthermia" could be attributed to direct effects of the drugs. Isolated male mice were treated with WAY 100635 (0, 1.5, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg) given 15 min prior to Gepirone (0, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg/kg). Rectal temperature was taken before the first injection and again prior to the behavioral tests. In the first session only, subjects were tested for anxiety on the elevated plus-maze before the resident-intruder test. Gepirone reduced aggression in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was counteracted by all doses of WAY 100635. On the elevated plus maze, Gepirone increased open-arm entries and duration and reduced risk assessment. The largest dose of WAY 100635 had a mild direct anxiolytic action, but all doses reduced the anxiolytic action of the largest dose of Gepirone. Body temperature was decreased dose dependently by Gepirone, an effect prevented by WAY 100635. The results justify attributing the involvement of the 5-HT1A receptors in the modulation of aggression and anxiety.     

Cannabinoids prevent the acute hyperthermia and partially protect against the 5-HT depleting effects of MDMA ("Ecstasy") in rats

Cannabinoid-MDMA interactions were examined in male Wistar rats. MDMA (4 x 5 mg/kg or 2 x 10 mg/kg over 4 h on each of 2 days) was administered with or without Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (4 x 2.5 mg/kg), the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 (2 x 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg) or the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 (2 x 5 mg/kg). Co-administered Delta 9-THC and CP 55,940 but not SR 141716 prevented MDMA-induced hyperthermia, causing a powerful hypothermia. Co-administered Delta 9-THC, CP 55,940 and SR 141716 all tended to decrease MDMA-induced hyperactivity. Co-administered Delta 9-THC provided protection against the long-term increases in anxiety seen in the emergence test, but not the social interaction test, 6 weeks after MDMA treatment. Co-administered Delta 9-THC and CP 55,940, but not SR 141716, partly prevented the long-term 5-HT and 5-HIAA depletion caused by MDMA in various brain regions. SR 141716 administered with CP 55,940 and MDMA prevented the hypothermic response to the CP 55,940/MDMA combination but did not alter the CP 55,940 attenuation of MDMA-induced 5-HT depletion. These results suggest a partial protective effect of co-administered cannabinoid receptor agonists on MDMA-induced 5-HT depletion and long-term anxiety. This action appears to operate independently of cannabinoid CB1 receptors.     

On the mechanism of anti-hyperthermic effects of LY379268 and LY487379, group II mGlu receptors activators, in the stress-induced hyperthermia in singly housed mice

Earlier studies have demonstrated that the agonists of the mGlu(2/3) receptors produced anxiolytic actions after peripheral administration. However, the mechanism of their action is still not clear. Therefore the aim of the present study was to specify the role of the GABAergic and serotonergic system in the mechanism of the anxiolytic activity of group II mGlu receptor activators by using the stress induced hyperthermia test (SIH) in singly housed mice. We used an orthosteric mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist, LY379268, which induced anti-hyperthermic efficacy in the doses of 1-5mg/kg (73% of inhibition after a highest dose). The effect of the second ligand used, a mGlu(2) receptor positive modulator (PAM), LY487379, was observed in a dose range of 0.5-5mg/kg and reached 53% of the inhibition. The blockade of GABAergic system by GABA(A) receptor antagonist flumazenil (10mg/kg) or GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP55845 (10mg/kg), and the blockade of serotonergic system by 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100635 (0.1 and 1mg/kg) or 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor antagonist ritanserin (0.5mg/kg) had no influence on the anti-hyperthermic effect induced by effective dose of LY379268. However, the action of the effective dose of LY487379 was enhanced when co-administered with flumazenil, WAY100635 (0.1mg/kg) and ritanserin. Similar results were observed for the subeffective dose of LY379268 (0.5mg/kg). WAY100635 in a dose of 1mg/kg did not induce any enhancing effect on the activity of compounds. Therefore, it seems that the antagonism towards GABA(A) receptors, presynaptic 5-HT(1A) and postsynaptic 5-HT(2A/2C) receptors is responsible for the phenomenon. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.     

Differential effects of 5-HT2C receptor ligands on place conditioning and locomotor activity in rats

Effects of the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A/1B/2C) receptor agonist N-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl] piperazine (TFMPP, 0-3.0 mg/kg s.c.) and the 5-HT2C receptor agonist 8,9-dichloro-2,3,4,4a-tetrahydro-1H-pyrazino[1,2-a]quinoxalin-5(6H)-one (WAY 161503, 0-3.0 mg/kg s.c.) in place conditioning were measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Effects of TFMPP, alone and with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamine (WAY 100635), the 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl) phenyl]-2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)-1,1'-biphenyl-4-carboxamide (GR 127935) or the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist 6-chloro-5-methyl-1-[[2-(2-methylpyrid-3-yloxy)pyrid-5-yl]carbamoyl]indoline (SB 242084) and of WAY 161503 alone and with SB 242084 on locomotor activity were also assessed. Neither TFMPP nor WAY 161503 induced place conditioning. WAY 161503 (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg s.c.) decreased locomotor activity; SB 242084 (1.0 mg/kg i.p.) blocked this effect. Reduced locomotor activity following TFMPP was blocked by SB 242084 but not WAY 100635 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) or GR 127935 (3.0 mg/kg s.c.). Behaviourally relevant levels of 5-HT2C receptor stimulation may not exert reinforcing effects, although other studies indicate that such manipulations alter reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse.     

WAY100635 prevents the changes induced by fluoxetine upon the 5-HT1A receptor functionality

5-HT1A receptor-mediated signalling in rat brain was evaluated after chronic administration (14 days; s.c.) of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRRI) fluoxetine (10 mg/kg/day) alone, or in combination with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 (0.1 mg/kg/day). The density of 5-HT1A binding sites was unchanged following fluoxetine, WAY100635, or the combination of fluoxetine and WAY100635. However, the net stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding induced by the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT was significantly attenuated in dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), but not in hippocampus, after chronic fluoxetine. Moreover, depending of the area analysed, the basal binding of [35S]GTPgammaS was differentially affected by this treatment: increased in DRN and decreased in hippocampal dentate gyrus. Interestingly, the changes in [35S]GTPgammaS basal binding and on 5-HT1A receptors functionality were prevented by the concomitant administration of WAY100635. The inhibition of dorsal raphe firing by 8-OH-DPAT was also attenuated in fluoxetine-treated rats (ED50 = 2.12 +/- 0.32 microg/kg and 4.34 +/- 0.09 microg/kg, for vehicle and fluoxetine respectively), an effect which was also prevented by the concomitant administration of WAY100635 (ED50 = 2.10 +/- 0.58 microg/kg). Chronic administration of WAY100635 alone did not affect the 5-HT1A receptor-induced stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding, nor the 8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of 5-HT neuron firing. These results demonstrate that the concomitant blockade of 5-HT1A receptors when administering fluoxetine prevents those adaptive changes of 5-HT1A receptor function associated with the chronic administration of this antidepressant. These findings could be relevant from the therapeutic point of view, and further support the potential benefit of treatments with a SSRI/5-HT1A receptor antagonist combination.     

Participation of the 5-HT1A receptor in the antidepressant-like effect of estrogens in the forced swimming test.

The aim of the present study was to explore the possible participation of the 5-HT(1A) receptor in the antidepressant-like action of two estrogenic compounds: 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) and ethynil-estradiol (EE(2)) in the FST. Ovariectomized female Wistar rats were used in all experiments. As a positive control, the effect of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n)-propil-aminotetraline (8-OH-DPAT; 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with WAY 100635 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) was analyzed in the FST. In order to analyze the participation of the 5-HT(1A) receptor in the antidepressant-like actions of estrogens, the effect of the selective antagonist WAY 100635 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) in combination with E(2) (10 microg/rat) and EE(2) (5 microg/rat) was studied in the FST. In this case, WAY 100635 was administered either simultaneously with the estrogens (48 h before the FST test) or 30 min before the FST. On the other hand, a suboptimal dose of 8-OH-DPAT (0.0625 mg/kg), combined with a noneffective dose of E(2) (2.5 microg/rat) or EE(2) (1.25 microg/rat), was tested in the FST. The results showed that 8-OH-DPAT (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), E(2) (10 microg/rat), and EE(2) (5 microg/rat), by themselves, exerted an antidepressant-like action. The antagonist to the 5-HT(1A) receptor WAY 100635, when applied together with 8-OH-DPAT or E(2), blocked their antidepressant-like actions, but not the one induced by EE(2). Interestingly, when the antagonist was applied 30 min before the FST, it was able to cancel the actions of EE(2) on immobility behavior, and had no effect on the actions of E(2.) Finally, when a subthreshold dose of 8-OH-DPAT was combined with a noneffective dose of either E(2) or EE(2), an antidepressant-like action was observed. The results support the notion that the 5-HT(1A) receptor is one of the mediators of the antidepressant-like action of E(2), and could indirectly contribute to the one induced by EE(2).     

Role of postsynaptic serotonin1A receptors in risperidone-induced increase in acetylcholine release in rat prefrontal cortex

Most atypical antipsychotic drugs increase acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex, but the detailed mechanism is still unknown. The present study examined the role of serotonin (5-HT)1A receptors in risperidone-induced increases in acetylcholine release in rat prefrontal cortex. Systemic administration of risperidone at doses of 1 and 2 mg/kg increased acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex in a dose-dependent manner. This increase was antagonized by systemic administration of high doses (1 and 3 mg/kg) of N-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl}-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY100635), a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist/dopamine D4 receptor agonist, but not by a low dose (0.1 mg/kg) of the antagonist which antagonizes preferentially presynaptic 5-HT1A autoreceptors. Furthermore, local application of WAY100635 into the prefrontal cortex also attenuated risperidone-induced increases in acetylcholine release. WAY100635 alone did not affect acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex. On the other hand, local application of risperidone (3 and 10 microM), the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (1 and 10 microM), and the dopamine D4 receptor antagonist 3-(4-(4-iodophenyl)piperazine-1-yl)methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine (1 and 10 microM) into the cortex did not affect acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex. These results suggest that risperidone increases acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex through a complex mechanism which is enhanced by prefrontal 5-HT1A receptor activation.     

Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol prolongs the immobility time in the mouse forced swim test: involvement of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and serotonergic system

In the present study, we investigated the effect of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive component of marijuana, on immobility time during the forced swim test. THC (2 and 6 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly prolonged the immobility time. In addition, THC at the same doses did not significantly affect locomotor activity in the open-field test. The selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist rimonabant (3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced the enhancement of immobility by THC (6 mg/kg). Similarly, the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced this THC-induced effect. Moreover, the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide dihydrochloride (WAY100635, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and the postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist MM-77 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed this reduction effect of 8-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast, the selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist (R)-3-[2-[2-(4-methylpiperidin-1-yl)ethyl]pyrrolidine-1-sulfonyl]phenol hydrochloride (SB269970) had no effect on this reduction effect of 8-OH-DPAT. WAY100635 (1 mg/kg) also reversed the reduction effect of citalopram (10 mg/kg). These findings suggest that the 5-HT(1A) receptors are involved in THC-induced enhancement of immobility.     

Effects of nociceptin on the exploratory behavior of mice in the hole-board test

The effects of nociceptin on the exploratory behavior of mice were examined using an automatic hole-board apparatus. A low dose of nociceptin (0.01 nmol, i.c.v.) had an anxiolytic effect, as reflected by an increase in head-dipping behavior. However, high doses of nociceptin (1-5 nmol, i.c.v.) produced a dose-dependent anxiogenic effect, as reflected by a decrease in head-dipping behavior. Both the anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of nociceptin were antagonized by nocistatin, an opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor antagonist. Although a low dose (0.01 nmol, i.c.v.) of nociceptin significantly increased the rate of serotonin (5-hyroxytryptamine, 5-HT) turnover in the hippocampus, a high dose (5 nmol, i.c.v.) of nociceptin significantly decreased this turnover in the amygdala. Furthermore, the anxiolytic effect of nociceptin at a low dose was antagonized by N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclo-hexanecarboxamide 3HCl (WAY100635), a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist. On the other hand, the anxiogenic effect of nociceptin at a high dose was antagonized by R(+)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A receptor agonist. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that nociceptin has dose-related anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects as a result of the activation of ORL1 receptors. The present results also suggest that a low dose of nociceptin has an anxiolytic effect via the activation of 5-HT ergic function in the hippocampus, while a high dose of nociceptin has an anxiogenic effect via the inhibition of 5-HT ergic function in the amygdala.     

The effects of compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three rat models of anxiety

Compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists have recently been reported to produce benzodiazepine-like antianxiety effects in mice. To assess the cross-species generality of these findings, the present experiments compared the effects of diazepam (0.625-5 mg/kg) with those of several non-selective (MM-77, 0.03-1 mg/kg and pindobind-5-HT(1A), 0.1-5 mg/kg) and selective (WAY100635, 0.01-10 mg/kg, p-MPPI, 0.01-3 mg/kg and SL88.0338, 0.3-10 mg/kg) 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three well-validated anxiolytic screening tests in rats: punished lever-pressing, punished drinking, and the elevated plus-maze. In the punished lever-pressing conflict test, none of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists modified rates of punished responding, whereas in the punished drinking test, WAY100635 (0.3-1 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (3-10 mg/kg), p-MPPI (1 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg), but not pindobind-5-HT(1A), produced clear anticonflict activity. However, the increase in punished responding with the 5-HT(1A) compounds was smaller than that produced by diazepam, indicating weaker anxiolytic-like activity. In the elevated plus-maze test, WAY100635 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (0.3-10 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.01-3 mg/kg), pindobind-5-HT(1A) (0.1-3 mg/kg), but not p-MPPI, showed anxiolytic-like activity on traditional behavioral indices, increasing the percentage of time spent in open arms and the percentage of open arm entries. As was the case in the punished drinking test, the magnitude of the positive effects of the 5-HT(1A) compounds was generally smaller than that of diazepam. Of the ethological measures recorded in the plus-maze, all compounds markedly decreased risk assessment (i.e. attempts) over the entire dose-range, but only diazepam clearly increased directed exploration (i.e. head-dipping). Although the present results demonstrate that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists elicit anxiolytic-like effects in rats, this action appears to be test-specific and, unlike previous findings in mice, smaller than that observed with benzodiazepines. The data are discussed in relation to the possible relevance of species differences in 5-HT(1A) receptor function and the nature of the anxiety response studied.     

The role of cannabinoid receptors in intestinal motility, defaecation and diarrhoea in rats

We have studied the effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonists (R)-(+)[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2, 3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone (WIN 55,212-2, 0. 3-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1, 1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol) (CP 55,940, 0.03-1 mg/kg, i.p.), the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist (N-piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A, 0. 3-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist N-[-(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazo le- 3-carboxamide (SR144528, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) on intestinal motility, defaecation and castor-oil (1 ml/100 g rat, orally)-induced diarrhoea in the rat. SR141716A, but not SR144528, increased defaecation and upper gastrointestinal transit, while WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 decreased upper gastrointestinal transit but not defaecation. WIN 55,212-3 (5 mg/kg), the less active enantiomer of WIN 55,212-2, was without effect. A per se non-effective dose of SR141716A (0.3 mg/kg), but not of SR144528 (1 mg/kg) or the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.), counteracted the inhibitory effect of both WIN 55,212-2 (1 mg/kg) and CP 55,940 (0.1 mg/kg) on gastrointestinal motility. WIN 55,212-2 did not modify castor-oil-induced diarrhoea, while CP 55,940 produced a transient delay in castor-oil-induced diarrhoea at the highest dose tested (1 mg/kg), an effect counteracted by SR141715A (5 mg/kg). These results suggest that (i) intestinal motility and defaecation could be tonically inhibited by the endogenous cannabinoid system, (ii) exogenous activation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors produces a reduction in intestinal motility in the upper gastrointestinal tract but not in defaecation, (iii) endogenous or exogenous activation of cannabinoid CB(2) receptors does not affect defaecation or intestinal motility and (iv) the cannabinoid receptor agonist, CP 55, 940, possesses a weak and transient antidiarrhoeal effect while the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2, does not possess antidiarrhoeal activity.     

The involvement of the serotonergic transmission system in neonatal and adult rat ileum contractility varies with age

The relevance of age on serotonergic involvement in the control of alimentary contractility has not been pharmacologically described. Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of acetylcholine, atropine, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and its related drugs on intestinal segments taken from the neonatal and adult ileum. 5-HT induced concentration-dependent contractions of ileum irrespective of age; however, these contractions were diminished by pretreatment with atropine only in neonatal tissues. In tissues taken from both the neonatal and adult ileum, methysergide (5-HT(1/2/5-7) receptor antagonist), ritanserin (5-HT(2) receptor antagonist), and RS23597-190/SB204070 (5-HT(4) receptor antagonists) all differentially reduced 5-HT-induced contractions at a concentration <100 μmol/l. At higher concentrations, the contractions were comparable to those in control tissues. Granisetron and ondansetron (5-HT(3) receptor antagonists) significantly reduced contractions induced by 5-HT at concentrations >30 μmol/l in both neonatal and adult ileum. Combined treatments with ritanserin, granisetron, plus RS23597-190 reduced or abolished contraction responses induced in neonatal ileum by 5-HT. SB269970A (5-HT(7) receptor antagonist) and WAY100635 (5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist) failed to influence contractile responses induced by 5-HT or 5-HT receptor agonists. Pretreatments with WAY100635 and SB267790A also had no influence on the contractile responses induced by 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist, 5-CT, and 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, which itself failed to induce a measurable response. It is concluded that the 5-HT-induced contractions in segments taken from both the neonatal and adult rat ileum were mediated via 5-HT(2) receptors, 5-HT(3) receptors and 5-HT(4) receptors. However, the effect of atropine on the neonatal rat intestine indicates that the mechanism of serotonergic involvement in ileal contractility is influenced by age.     

Aripiprazole inhibits marble-burying behavior via 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptor-independent mechanisms

Aripiprazole is a first next-generation atypical antipsychotic drug with dopamine system stabilizing, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) 5-HT(1A) receptor partial agonistic, and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonistic properties. In the present study, we examined the effect of aripiprazole on marble-burying behavior, which has been considered an animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder, and compared this with the effects of other atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine and quetiapine. Aripiprazole (1 mg/kg, i.p.) inhibited marble-burying behavior without affecting the locomotor activity in mice. Conversely, olanzapine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) and quetiapine (100 mg/kg, p.o.) showed significant suppression of locomotor activity and impairment of motor coordination at the dose that inhibited marble-burying behavior. On the other hand, a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane (WAY100635, 3 mg/kg, i.p.) markedly antagonized the inhibition of marble-burying behavior by 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, 3 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist. By contrast, WAY100635 at the same dose had no effect on the inhibition of marble-burying behavior by aripiprazole (1 mg/kg, i.p.). Quinpirole, a dopamine D(2) receptor agonist, showed significant suppression of locomotor activity at the dose that inhibited marble-burying behavior. Conversely, L-741,626, a selective dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist, at a dose of 10 mg/kg inhibited marble-burying behavior without affecting the locomotor activity. On the other hand, ketanserin, a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist, had no effect on the marble-burying behavior. These findings suggest that aripiprazole may be a useful drug for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, and that aripiprazole inhibits the marble-burying behavior via 5-HT(1A) receptor-independent mechanisms.     

Partial agonist-like profile of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A in a food-reinforced operant paradigm

Both cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists, such as delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-THC), CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212-2, and the antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A, dose-dependently suppress operant behavior. The present study investigated to what extent combined i.p. application of SR141716A with these cannabinoids resulted in mutually antagonistic effects, in additive effects, or in no interactive effects on operant responding in rats trained in a fixed-ratio 10, food-reinforced 10-min procedure. Pretreatment with SR141716A either had no effect on (at 0.3-1mg/kg), or partially blocked (at 3 mg/kg), the inhibitory effects on responding induced by delta-THC (3-5 mg/kg) and CP 55,940 (0.03-0.2 mg/kg). Interestingly, while 3 mg/kg SR141716A induced moderate inhibitory effects on operant responding, its combination with either agonist resulted in the same level of inhibitory activity on responding as that obtained by SR141716A when tested alone. Pretreatment with a low dose of CP 55,940 (0.01 mg/kg) or WIN 55,212-2 (0.3 mg/kg) did not affect response inhibition induced by SR141716A. Combination of SR141716A (0.5 and 1mg/kg) with delta-THC (3 mg/kg) resulted in the same level of response inhibition, independently of whether SR141716A was given 5 min before or 15 min after delta-THC. Although alternative explanations are conceivable, the data may indicate that SR141716A is a partial agonist at those cannabinoid receptors mediating the response-rate suppressive effects of cannabinoids.     

Pharmacological characterization of MP349, a novel 5-HT1A-receptor antagonist with anxiolytic-like activity,in mice and rats

The purpose of this study was to further characterize the pharmacological effects of MP349 (trans-1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4-succinimidocyclohexyl)piperazine), a new serotonin 5-HT(1A) postsynaptic receptor antagonist, using several biochemical and behavioural assays. The silent 5-HT(1A)-receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide) was used as a reference compound in in-vivo tests, and diazepam served as standard anxiolytic drug in animal models of anxiety. In this study we showed that MP349 bound with moderate affinity (K(i) = 234 nM) for alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, and with very low affinity (K(i) > 2600 nM) for 5-HT(2A), dopamine D(1), D(2) and benzodiazepine receptors. The effects of MP349 on presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors were studied in two models (mice and rats). Like WAY 100635, MP349 antagonized the hypothermia induced by the 5-HT(1A)-receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin(8-OH-DPAT) in mice. Neither MP349 nor WAY 100635 administered alone induced hypothermia. In a rat microdialysis study, MP349 (like WAY 100635) did not affect 5-HT dialysate level in the prefrontal cortex; however, when given before 8-OH-DPAT, it inhibited the decrease in 5-HT release induced by the 5-HT(1A )agonist. The data demonstrated that MP349 behaved like a functional antagonist of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors. The potential anxiolytic activity of MP349 and reference drugs was examined in a conflict drinking test in rats, a plus-maze test in rats and a four-plate test in mice. MP349 and WAY 100635 produced anxiolytic-like effects, though somewhat weaker than those induced by diazepam, and only in the case of diazepam the anxiolytic-like effects were dose-dependent. Moreover, MP349 administered in doses inducing anxiolytic-like effects did not disturb the locomotor activity (open field test) or locomotor coordination (rota-rod test) of rats. These and earlier results indicated that MP349 was an antagonist of 5-HT(1A) receptors which exhibited anxiolytic-like activity in an animal model of anxiety.     

Effects of selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists on regional serotonin synthesis in the rat brain: an autoradiographic study with alpha-[14C]methyl-L-tryptophan.

The effects of acute and chronic administration of WAY100635 and WAY100135, serotonin (5-HT)1A antagonists, on 5-HT synthesis rates, calculated from the trapping of alpha-[14C]methyl-L-tryptophan (alpha-MTrp), were evaluated in the rat brain using autoradiography. In the acute treatment studies, WAY100635 (1 mg/kg) induced a significant increase in 5-HT synthesis in the median raphe nucleus and some nerve terminal structures (range between 18 and 53%), while WAY100135 (10 mg/kg) produced a significant decrease of synthesis, in the range between 16 and 33%, in the raphe magnus nucleus and several projection areas. The action of WAY100635 given acutely was likely a result of antagonist actions at the 5-HT1A somato-dendritic autoreceptors. WAY100135 probably acted acutely as a partial agonist. In the chronic treatment studies, WAY100635 (1 mg/kg/day) and WAY100135 (10 mg/kg/day) were administered for 7 days as s.c. injections once a day. Chronic treatment with both compounds significantly reduced the rate of 5-HT synthesis in the nerve terminal structures and produced a significant increase in the raphe nuclei. These treatments did not have any effect on the plasma free or total tryptophan.