Laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure: a viable option for treatment of acutely perforated diverticultis

Background  A laparoscopic technique for acutely perforated diverticulitis (i.e., laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure) has not been described. The authors present their technique for laparoscopic sigmoid resection, end colostomy, and subsequent laparoscopic takedown of colostomy. Methods  A retrospective review of patients with Hinchey III/IV diverticulitis who underwent a laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure was performed in this study. Laparoscopic takedown of sigmoid colostomy was performed 2 to 3 months later. Data from these procedures including estimated blood loss (EBL), length of the operative procedure, patient outcomes, and demographics were evaluated. Results  Seven patients with a mean age of 49.7 years underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with end colostomy. None of these patients had a history of diverticulitis. Their mean EBL was 138 ml, and their mean operative time was 154 min. None of the procedures required conversion to use of a hand port or conversion to open procedure. The average time to return of bowel function was 3.7 days, with one patient experiencing a postoperative ileus. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.6 days. There were no complications. Laparoscopic Hartmann’s takedown was performed for all the patients approximately 2 to 3 months later. The mean EBL was 107 ml, and the average operative time was 189 min. One patient had intraoperative anastomotic leak, which was successfully repaired and retested. Again, none of the procedures required the use of a hand port or a laparotomy. The average time to return of bowel function was 3.4 days. The average length of hospital stay was 5.3 days, with one patient experiencing a fat necrosis. Conclusions  Laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure and laparoscopic takedown are technically feasible procedures with reasonable outcomes.     

Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis

BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective evaluation of elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis in order to assess the risks and benefits of this approach. METHODS: Between November 1992 and November 1996, 54 consecutive patients were included in this study. Their mean age was 59 +/- 13 years (range, 36-81). The number of attacks of diverticulitis before colectomy ranged from one to four (mean, 2.2 +/- 0.7). The operative technique consisted of elective division of the inferior mesenteric vessels, left colonic flexure mobilization, and colorectal anastomosis using the cross-stapling technique. RESULTS: Five procedures (9.2%) were converted. The primary cause for conversion was obesity. These patients had a simple postoperative course. There were no postoperative deaths. Three patients (6.1%) developed abdominal complications, and four patients (8.2%) had abdominal wall complications. Postoperative paralytic ileus lasted only 2.3 +/- 0.7 days (range, 1-6), allowing for a rapid reintroduction of regular diet. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.4 +/- 2.7 days (range, 4-15). CONCLUSIONS: Elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is feasible in most cases. In most cases, the operative risk is low and the postoperative course is uneventful. Elective sigmoid laparoscopic colectomy should be considered a good therapeutic option for symptomatic diverticulitis.     

Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis

This study compared laparoscopic with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis. Increased use of less invasive techniques makes it vitally important to evaluate outcomes of these techniques as compared with standard open procedures. Patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis without hemorrhage (code 56211) between January 1997 and December 2001 were reviewed. Two groups were identified: those undergoing open sigmoid colectomy and those undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, operative time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, morbidity/mortality, and hospital charges were compared. During the study period 271 sigmoid colectomies were performed for diverticulitis without hemorrhage: 56 laparoscopically and 215 with the standard open technique. Four patients required conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy. Mean ASA scores were: open group 2.4; laparoscopic group, 1.9 (P < 0.001). Mean operative times were: laparoscopic group, 170 +/- 45 minutes; open group, 140 +/- 49 minutes (P < 0.001). In the open group 39 patients required transfer to the ICU; one patient in the laparoscopic group required transfer to the ICU. Average hospital lengths of stay for the open and laparoscopic groups were 9.06 and 4.12 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Complications were recorded in 57 (27%) of 215 patients who underwent an open procedure versus 5 (9%) of 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (P < 0.01). There were three deaths in the open group and none in laparoscopic group. Average total hospital charges were 25,700 dollars for open sigmoid colectomy and 17,414 dollars for laparoscopic colectomy. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy compares favorably with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis.     

Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis

Background: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic and open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in patients aged ≥75 years. Methods: From January 1993 to December 1998, all patients 75 years of age and older undergoing an elective colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis were included in the study. The patients were divided into the following two groups: group 1 (n= 22) consisted of patients who underwent a laparoscopic procedure; group 2 (n= 24) consisted of patients who underwent an open procedure. Results: In group 1, there were 12 women and 10 men with a mean age of 77.2 years (range, 75–82); in group 2, there were 14 women and 10 men with a mean age of 78 years (range, 76–84) (p= 0.37). There was no difference between the groups in ASA classification. The operative time was shorter in group 2 (136 vs 234 mins). The postoperative period during which parenteral analgesics were required (5.4 vs 8.2 days, p= 0.001), postoperative morbidity (18% vs 50%, p= 0.02), postoperative length of hospital stay (13.1 vs 20.2 days, p= 0.003), and the inpatient rehabilitation (6 vs 15 patients, p= 0.01) were significantly shorter for group 1 than for group 2. There were no perioperative deaths. The conversion rate was 9% in group 1. Conclusion: The data from the present study suggest that laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis can be applied safely to older patients with fewer complication, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and a more rapid return to preoperative activity levels than that seen with open colorectal resection. Received: 22 November 2000/Accepted: 22 February 2000/Online publication: 7 September 2000     

Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients

Background It was the aim of this prospective study to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease.Methods All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease within a 10-year period were prospectively entered into a PC database registry. Indications for laparoscopic surgery were acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey stages I and IIa), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, sigmoid stenosis or outlet obstruction caused by chronic diverticulitis. Surgical procedures (sigmoid and anterior resection, left colectomy and resection rectopexy) included intracorporeal dissection and colorectal anastomosis. Parameters studied included age, gender, stage of disease, procedure, duration of surgery, intraoperative technical variables, transfusion requirements, conversion rate, total complication rate including major (requiring re-operation), minor (conservative treatment) and late-onset (post-discharge) complication rates, stay on ICU, hospitalisation, mortality, and recurrence. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analysed. Comparative outcome analysis was performed with respect to stage of disease and experience.Results A total of 396 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Conversion rate was 6.8% (n=27), so that laparoscopic completion rate was 93.2% (n=369). Most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess or fistulas. The most common procedure was sigmoid resection (n=279), followed by anterior resection (n=36) and left colectomy (n=29). Total complication rate was 18.4% (n=68). Major complication rate was 7.6% (n=28), whereas the most common complication requiring re-operation was haemorrhage in 3.3% (n=12). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 1.6% (n=6). Minor complications were noted in 10.7% (n=40), late-onset complications occurred in 2.7% (n=10). Mortality was 0.5% (n=2). Mean duration of surgery was 193 (range 75–400) min, return to normal diet was completed after 6.8 (range 3–19) days. Mean hospital stay was 11.8 (range 4–71) days. No recurrence of diverticulitis occurred.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.     

Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy for Diverticulitis: a Prospective Study

Background:

Surgical treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease is still debatable. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy in patients with diverticulitis. Patients offered laparoscopic surgery presented with acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey type I, II, III), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, bleeding, or sigmoid stenosis caused by chronic diverticulitis.

Method:

All patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy within a 12-year period were prospectively entered into a database registry. One-stage laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis constituted the planned procedure. A 4-trocar approach with suprapubic minilaparotomy was performed. Main data recorded were age, sex, postoperative pain, return of bowel function, operation time, duration of hospital stay, and early and late complications.

Results:

During the study period, 260 sigmoid colectomies were performed for diverticulitis. The cohort included 104 male and 156 female patients; M to F ratio was 4:6. Postoperative pain was controlled by NSAIDs or weak opioid analgesia. Fifteen patients (5.7%) required conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy. The most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess, and peritonitis. Mean operative time was 130±54. Average postoperative hospital stay was 10±3 days. A longer hospital stay was recorded for Hinchey type IIb patients. Complications were recorded in 30 patients (11.5%). The most common complications that required reoperation were hemorrhage in 2 patients (0.76) and anastomotic leak in 5 patients (only 3 of them required reoperation). The mortality among them was 2 patients (0.76%).

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible, and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.     

Factors associated with complications of open versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: This study critically reviews sigmoid colon resection for diverticulitis comparing open and laparoscopic techniques. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all open and laparoscopic cases of diverticulitis between 1992 and 2001. Data analyzed included the following: indications for operation, postoperative complications, and incidence of laparoscopic conversion to laparotomy. Major and minor complications were analyzed in relation to patients' preoperative diagnosis, age, presence or absence of splenic flexure mobilization, length of stay, and laparoscopic sigmoid resection versus open sigmoid resection. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, 166 resections for diverticulitis were performed including 126 open cases and 40 laparoscopic cases. No significant differences existed in patient characteristics between the groups. Major complications occurred in 14% of patients, and the laparoscopic conversion rate was 20%. The presence of abscess, fistula, or stricture preoperatively was associated with a higher complication rate only in patients > or =50 years old undergoing open sigmoid resection. The length of stay between patients undergoing laparoscopic resection was significantly less than in patients having open resection. CONCLUSION: Advanced laparoscopic sigmoid resection is an alternative to open sigmoid resection in patients with diverticulitis and its complications. Open sigmoid resection in patients >50 years may have a higher complication rate in complicated diverticulitis when compared with laparoscopic sigmoid resection (all patient ages) and open sigmoid resection (patients <50 years old). Regarding complications, no difference existed between the length of stay in patients with open vs. laparoscopic resection.     

Long-term Experience with the Laparoscopic Approach to Perforated Diverticulitis plus Generalized Peritonitis

Background  The treatment of perforated diverticulitis is changing form the current standard of laparotomy with resection, Hartmann procedure, and colostomy to a minimally invasive technique. In patients with complicated acute diverticulitis and peritonitis without gross fecal contamination, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, inspection of the colon, and intraoperative drain placement of the peritoneal cavity appears to alleviate morbidity and improve the outcome. In this article, we report our experience of a laparoscopic peritoneal lavage technique with delayed definitive resection when necessary. Method and materials  Records of patients who underwent intraoperative peritoneal lavage for purulent diverticulitis at the Texas Endosurgery Institute from April 1991 to September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Results  Forty patients were included in the study, with a male/female ratio of 26:14. The average age was 60 years. Many had associated co-morbidities. The average operating time was 62 minutes. There were no conversions to an open procedure. Apart from mild postoperative paralytic ileus in six patients and chest infections in two, there were no significant peroperative or postoperative complications. Just over 50% underwent elective interval laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. During the mean follow-up of 96 months, none of the other patients required further surgical intervention. Conclusion  Laparoscopic lavage of the peritoneal cavity and drainage is a safe alternative to the current standard of treatment for the management of perforated diverticulitis with or without gross fecal contamination. It is associated with a decrease in the overall cost of treatment; the use of a colostomy is avoided; patient improvement is immediate; and there is a reduction in mortality and morbidity as definitive laparoscopic resection can be performed in a nonemergent fashion. Perhaps the most important benefit, other than avoiding a colostomy, is the association of fewer wound complications such as dehiscence, wound infection, and the high risk of hernia formation. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage should be considered in all patients in whom medical and/or percutaneous treatment is not feasible. It carries minimal morbidity and should be considered the standard of care.     

Gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic colectomy: results of a prospective, observational, multicenter study

Background  

Although evidence suggests that laparoscopic colectomy (LC) results in faster gastrointestinal (GI) recovery than open bowel resection, previous studies were performed at single institutions or generally not controlled for diet introduction or perioperative care, making the results difficult to interpret. A prospective, observational, multicenter study was planned to investigate GI recovery, length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative ileus (POI)-related morbidity after LC.     

Incidental paraduodenal hernia found during laparoscopic colectomy

This paper describes a rare right paraduodenal hernia discovered during an elective laparoscopic colon resection. Our patient was a 60-year-old Asian man with a history of multiple bouts of diverticulitis and a lifelong history of mild constipation and postprandial abdominal pain. Prior CT scans and preoperative barium enema confirmed the diagnosis of diverticular disease, and no other abnormalities were appreciated. At laparoscopic exploration, a right paraduodenal hernia was found with complete herniation of the small intestine under the ascending colon and hepatic flexure. The unclear anatomy prompted conversion to an open laparotomy. This allowed safe reduction of the hernia and sac excision. Adhesions were lysed to relieve a partial duodenal obstruction, and a Ladds procedure was performed to correct the incomplete rotation. Additionally, a sigmoid colectomy was performed. After prolonged ileus, the patient was discharged on postoperative day 14. At 6-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and doing well.     

The Evolving Role of Laparoscopy in Colonic Diverticular Disease: A Systematic Review

Background

A PubMed search of the biomedical literature was carried out to systematically review the role of laparoscopy in colonic diverticular disease. All original reports comparing elective laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and open colon resection for diverticular disease of the colon, as well as original reports evaluating outcomes after laparoscopic lavage for acute diverticulitis, were considered. Of the 21 articles chosen for final review, nine evaluated laparoscopic versus open elective resection, six compared hand-assisted colon resection versus conventional laparoscopic resection, and six considered laparoscopic lavage. Five were randomized controlled trials.

Results

Elective laparoscopic colon resection for diverticular disease is associated with increased operative time, decreased postoperative pain, fewer postoperative complications, less paralytic ileus, and shorter hospital stay compared to open colectomy. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage appears to be a safe and effective therapy for selected patients with complicated diverticulitis.

Conclusions

Elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity compared to open colectomy, leading to shorter hospital stay and fewer costs. Laparoscopic lavage has an increasing but poorly defined role in complicated diverticulitis.     

Laparoscopic converted to open colectomy: predictors and outcomes from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Background

Early in their learning curve, surgeons need to appropriately select patients to avoid conversion from laparoscopic to an open colectomy.

Methods

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, laparoscopic and laparoscopic converted to open colectomies performed between 2002 and 2007 were compared. We evaluated patient and institutional characteristics to find significant predictors and outcomes of conversion.

Results

Between 2002 and 2007, the rate of conversion was high, ranging from 35.7% to 38.0%. Multivariate predictors of conversion included obesity, diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, constipation, metastatic disease, nonelective admission, left or transverse colectomy, intraoperative complication, lower socioeconomic status, uninsured status, and rural hospital location. A colectomy for benign colon polyps was less likely to be converted. Conversion to an open colectomy did not increase inpatient mortality.

Conclusions

Predictors of conversion from open to laparoscopic colectomy were found from a national database reflecting all US laparoscopic colectomies. Conversion did not increase inpatient mortality.     

Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn's disease

Laparoscopy is still controversial when applied for the attempted cure of colorectal cancer. Although some advantages may be possible, some disadvantages also have been postulated. Laparoscopic treatment of benign disease is far less controversial. Three of the best procedures and indications, respectively, are laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis, laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection for terminal ileal Crohn's disease, and laparoscopic stoma creation for perianal Crohn's disease. Other potentially advantageous surgeries and indications include laparoscopic-assisted total abdominal colectomy for colonic Crohn's disease, laparoscopic total proctocolectomy for colonic and anorectal Crohn's disease, and laparoscopic secondary ileoproctostomy or coloproctostomy as Hartmann reversal procedures. Significant benefits can be expected with these procedures relative to decreased pain; ileus; length of hospital stay; disability, and, possibly, adhesion formation and subsequent bowel obstruction, and improved cosmesis.     

Laparoscopic colorrhaphy, irrigation and drainage in the treatment of complicated acute diverticulitis: initial experience

The natural history of diverticulosis is worthy of note for its acute, sometimes recurrent, attacks of diverticulitis and the significant risk of serious complications, such as abscess, fistula and peritonitis. Most mild attacks of diverticulitis respond well to medical therapy while surgical treatment is indicated in the complicated forms of the disease. We evaluate the results of treatment of complicated acute diverticulitis by laparoscopic colorrhaphy, irrigation and drainage as a minimal surgical approach in 7 selected patients. We retrospectively analyzed all patients admitted to our institute for acute diverticulitis from 1996 to 2001. One hundred and thirty-five patients were admitted for acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Ninety-eight patients (72%) had their diverticular disease completely resolved after medical therapy, while 37 (28%) required a surgical approach. Seven patients underwent a laparoscopic colorrhaphy with irrigation and drainage. Laparoscopic procedures were completed in 6 patients. No perioperative morbidity or mortality was observed. All patients were discharged with no further re-operation. The technique could be considered a valid alternative for the management of complicated and perforated diverticulitis in selected patients.     

Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis

BACKGROUND: In the large bowel, resection of the sigmoid colon is the most commonly performed laparoscopic intervention because large bowel lesions often are located in this part of the bowel and the procedure technically is the most favorable one. A number of publications involving case series or the results of highly experienced individual surgeons already have confirmed the feasibility of laparoscopic resection in cases of diverticulitis. The aim of the present prospective multicentric investigation was to check the results obtained by a large number of surgeons performing laparoscopic resection of the sigmoid colon for diverticulitis in various stages of severity. RESULTS: Between January 8, 1995 and January 1, 1998, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group recruited 1,118 patients to the prospective multicenter study. Diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon, which accounted for 304 cases, was the most common indication for laparoscopic intervention. In most of these patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (81.9%), the diverticulitis manifested as acute phlegmonous peridiverticulitis, recurrent attacks of inflammation, or stenosis. Complicated forms of diverticulitis in Hinchey stages I to IV and late complications of chronic diverticular disease with fistula formation and bleeding accounted for only 18.1% of the cases. For the overall group, the conversion rate was 7.2%. Patients with less severe diverticulitis (i.e., those presenting with peridiverticulitis, stenosis, or recurrent attacks of inflammation) had a conversion rate of 4.8% and the rate for complicated cases was 18.2%. Regarding laparoscopically completed interventions, 3 of 282 patients died (1.1%). In the group of patients with peridiverticulitis, stenosis, or recurrent attacks of inflammation the overall complication rate was 14.8%. The group with perforated diverticulitis in Hinchey stages I to IV or those with fistula and bleeding, the corresponding rate was 28.9%, and after conversion it was 31.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal interventions in sigmoid diverticulitis are, for the most part, carried out as elective procedures for peridiverticulitis, stenosis, or recurrent attacks of inflammation. The conversion, complication, and mortality rates associated with these interventions are acceptable. Laparoscopic procedures in Hinchey stages I to IV sigmoid diverticulitis and in the presence of fistula and bleeding are more likely to be associated with complications, and should be carried out only by highly experienced laparoscopic surgeons.     

A single training center’s experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: Can all patients be approached laparoscopically?

Background  This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes for consecutive patients with diverticular disease who underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Methods  Data for this patient population were collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Results  Between December 2001 and March 2007, 200 consecutive patients (93 men and 107 women) with an average age of 55 years were identified. All cases were managed by one of two colorectal surgeons. Of the 200 patients, 158 had recurrent diverticulitis, 20 had fistulas, 12 had abscesses, 8 had strictures, 1 had a mass, and 1 had a bleed. The mean operative time was 159 min, and the conversion rate was 8%. A total of 30 early postoperative complications occurred for 26 patients including wound infection (n = 9), ileus (n = 8), Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 3), urinary retention (n = 3), pelvic abscess (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1) urinary tract infection (n = 1), anastomotic leak (n = 1), and small bowel obstruction (n = 1). Late complications experienced by 11 patients included Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 3), incisional hernia (n = 3), wound infection (n = 3), wound hematoma (n = 1), and intraabdominal hemorrhage (n = 1). Conclusions  The authors believe it is feasible to offer elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy to all patients with symptomatic diverticular disease despite preoperative risk factors.     

The Sigma-trial protocol: a prospective double-blind multi-centre comparison of laparoscopic versus open elective sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis

Backround  

Diverticulosis is a common disease in the western society with an incidence of 33–66%. 10–25% of these patients will develop diverticulitis. In order to prevent a high-risk acute operation it is advised to perform elective sigmoid resection after two episodes of diverticulitis in the elderly patient or after one episode in the younger (< 50 years) patient. Open sigmoid resection is still the gold standard, but laparoscopic colon resections seem to have certain advantages over open procedures. On the other hand, a double blind investigation has never been performed. The Sigma-trial is designed to evaluate the presumed advantages of laparoscopic over open sigmoid resections in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis.     

Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background  Evidence of benefits of laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted colectomies (LAC) over open procedures in gastrointestinal surgery has continued to accumulate. With its wide implementation, technical difficulties and limitations of LAC have become clear. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was introduced in an attempt to facilitate the transition from open techniques to minimally invasive procedures. Continuing debate exists about which approach is to be preferred, HALS or LAC. Several studies have compared these two techniques in colorectal surgery, but no single study provided evidence which procedure is superior. Therefore, a systematic review was carried out comparing HALS with LAC colorectal resection. Methods  Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Embase Cochrane) and cross-reference search. The database search, quality assessment, and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Minimal outcome criteria for inclusion were operating time, conversion rate, hospital stay, and morbidity. Results  Out of 468 studies a total of 13 studies were selected for comprehensive review. Two randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 11 non-RCTs, comprising 1017 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Because of possible clinical heterogeneity two groups of procedures were created: segmental colectomies and total (procto)colectomies. In the segmental colectomy group significant differences in favor of the HALS group were seen in operating time (WMD 19 min) and conversion rate (OR of 0.3 conversions). In the total (procto)colectomy group a significant difference in favor of the HALS group was seen in operating time (WMD 61 min). Conclusions  This systematic review indicates that HALS provides a more efficient segmental colectomy regarding operating time and conversion rate, particularly accounting for diverticulitis. A significant operating time advantage exists for HALS total (procto)colectomy. HALS must therefore be considered a valuable addition to the laparoscopic armamentarium to avoid conversion and speed up complicated colectomies.     

Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease

BACKGROUND: The disadvantages of laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease include the risk of conversion to open operation and longer operative time. The aim of this study was to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion in 168 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopically assisted colectomy between January 1994 and June 2001. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion to open surgery in terms of postoperative morbidity and patient recovery. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality, morbidity, conversion and reoperation rates were zero, 21.4 per cent (n = 36), 14.3 per cent (n = 24) and 3.0 per cent (n = 5) respectively. The reasons for conversion were presence of intraperitoneal adhesions and/or inflammatory pseudotumour (n = 21), an intraoperative diagnosis of sigmoid cancer (n = 1), hypercapnia (n = 1) and abdominal bleeding (n = 1). Three preoperative factors were associated with a significant higher risk of conversion: surgical expertise, the presence of sigmoid stenosis or fistula, and the severity of diverticulitis on pathological examination. Morbidity was no different between laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (30 of 144; 20.8 per cent) and converted procedures (six of 24; 25.0 per cent). Open conversion was associated with a longer operative time and significantly delayed patient recovery and hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Surgical experience and severe diverticular disease are predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy. Even if necessary, conversion does not increase the morbidity rate.     

Laparoscopic left colon resection for diverticular disease

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. METHODS: All patients presenting with acute or chronic diverticulitis, obstruction, abscess, or fistula were included. Symptomatic diverticular disease was the main surgical indication (95%). RESULTS: Between March 1992 and August 1999 170 consecutive patients underwent surgery. Of these, 21 patients (12%) had significant obesity, with body mass index (BMI) greater than 30. The average length of surgery was 141 +/- 36 min. In 163 patients (96%), the procedure was performed solely with the laparoscope. The nasogastric tube was removed on postoperative day 2 +/- 1.9, and oral feeding was started on postoperative day 3.4 +/- 2.1. The average length of hospital stay after surgery was 8.5 +/- 3.7 days. During the first postoperative month, there were no deaths. However, 11 patients (6.5%) had surgical complications: 5 anastomotic leaks (2.9%), 1 intraabdominal abscess (0.6%), and 3 wound infections (1.7%). There were four reinterventions (2.4%), with two diverting colostomies. Secondarily, 10 anastomotic stenoses (5.9%) were observed. Eight patients required a reintervention: seven anastomotic resections by open laparotomy and one terminal colostomy. Seven patients (4.1%) reported retrograde ejaculation, and one reported impotence. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of the laparoscopic approach to diverticular disease is established with a conversion rate of 4%, a low incidence of acute septic complications (5.3%), and a mortality rate of 0%. Therefore, laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy has become our procedure of choice in the treatment of diverticular disease.