Treatment of aggression with topiramate in male borderline patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex mental disease associated with severe serious functional impairment, affective instability, and impulsive aggression. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of topiramate versus placebo in the treatment of aggression in men with borderline personality disorder. METHODS: We conducted an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in 42 male subjects (42 of 44) meeting DSM-IV criteria for BPD. The Structured Clinical Interview (SCID I and II) was carried out. The subjects were randomly assigned to topiramate (n = 22) or placebo (n = 20). RESULTS: Significant changes on four STAXI scales (State Anger, p < .01; Trait Anger, p < .05; Anger Out, p < .01; Anger Control, p < .01) were observed in the subjects treated with topiramate. A nonsignificant difference was found on the Anger In scale (p = .86). Additional significant weight loss was observed (difference in weight loss between the both groups was 5.0 kg, p < .01, 95% confidence interval = [-6.5 to 3.4]). All subjects tolerated topiramate relatively well. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate appears to be an effective agent in the treatment of anger in men with BPD. Mild weight loss can be expected.     

Treatment of aggression with topiramate in male borderline patients, part II: 18-month follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: We previously tested topiramate, an anticonvulsant, in the treatment of aggression in men with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (Nickel M, Nickel C, Kaplan P, Lahmann C, Mühlbacher M, Tritt K, et al. Treatment of aggression with topiramate in male borderline patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:495-9), and found significant changes on most scales of the state-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI) and significant weight loss eight weeks later. The aim of this trial was to assess topiramate's efficacy in the long-term therapy for aggression in men with BPD. METHODS: This 18-month follow-up observation, in which the previous patients (topiramate group: n=22; former placebo group: n=22) were examined bianually, was carried out. RESULTS: According to the intent-to-treat principle, significant changes on all scales of the STAXI were observed in the subjects treated with topiramate. Additional significant weight loss was observed. All subjects tolerated topiramate relatively well. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate appears to be an effective, relatively safe agent in the long-term treatment of patients with BPD. Mild, non-transient weight loss can be expected.     

Weight gain and antipsychotic medication: differences between antipsychotic-free and treatment periods.

BACKGROUND: We performed a retrospective analysis of data involving 121 inpatients to examine the rate of weight gain during antipsychotic-free periods and during treatment with various antipsychotic drugs. METHOD: Data were analyzed to determine differences in weekly weight change during antipsychotic-free (N = 65), typical antipsychotic (N = 51), or atypical antipsychotic (N = 130) treatment periods. Atypical antipsychotic treatment periods were further subdivided into olanzapine (N = 45), clozapine (N = 47), or risperidone (N = 36) treatment periods. A paired comparison was conducted on 65 patients who had an antipsychotic-free treatment period preceding or following a neuroleptic drug treatment period. In addition, patients were classified as either non-obese (with a body mass index [BMI] < or = 29.9 kg/ml) or obese (BMI > or = 30.0 kg/m2) to test whether the rate of weight gain during treatment periods was related to initial BMI. RESULTS: Across all treatment periods, weekly weight gain was as follows: 0.89 lb/wk (0.40 kg/wk) on atypical antipsychotic medication, 0.61 lb/wk (0.27 kg/wk) on typical antipsychotic medication, and 0.21 lb/wk (0.09 kg/wk) on no antipsychotic medications. The atypical antipsychotic versus antipsychotic-free comparison was significant (F = 3.51; df = 2,231; p = .031), while the typical antipsychotic versus antipsychotic-free comparison was not. Among the individual atypical antipsychotic medications, significantly more weight gain occurred during olanzapine treatment (1.70 lb/wk) (0.76 kg/wk) than with either clozapine (0.50 lb/wk) (0.22 kg/wk) or risperidone (0.34 lb/wk) (0.15 kg/wk) treatments (F = 7.77; df = 2,117; p = .001). In the paired analysis with patients serving as their own controls, the difference between weekly weight gain during atypical antipsychotic treatment and antipsychotic-free treatment was significant (t = -3.91; df = 44; p = .001), while the difference between weight gain during typical antipsychotic treatment and antipsychotic-free treatment was not significant. With the individual drugs. treatment with both olanzapine and clozapine caused significantly higher weekly weight gain than antipsychotic-free treatment (p = .001 and p = .036, respectively). while treatment with risperidone did not. Non-obese patients (BMI < 29.9 kg/m2) and obese patients (BMI > 30.0 kg/m2) did not differ significantly in their weight gain during typical or atypical antipsychotic treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with atypical antipsychotics was associated with more weight gain than treatment with typical antipsychotics. Among the atypical drugs, olanzapine was associated with more weight gain than either clozapine or risperidone. The patient's admission BMI was not associated with the amount of weight gained during subsequent antipsychotic treatment.     

Open-label adjunctive topiramate in the treatment of bipolar disorders.

BACKGROUND: To preliminarily explore the spectrum of effectiveness and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drug topiramate in bipolar disorder, we evaluated the response of 56 bipolar outpatients in the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Outcome Network (SFBN) who had been treated with adjunctive topiramate in an open-label, naturalistic fashion. METHODS: In this case series, response to topiramate was assessed every 2 weeks for the first 3 months according to standard ratings in the SFBN, and monthly thereafter while patients remained on topiramate. Patients' weights, body mass indices (BMIs), and side effects were also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients who completed at least 2 weeks of open-label, add-on topiramate treatment, 30 had manic, mixed, or cycling symptoms, 11 had depressed symptoms, and 13 were relatively euthymic at the time topiramate was begun. Patients who had been initially treated for manic symptoms displayed significant reductions in standard ratings scores after 4 weeks, after 10 weeks, and at the last evaluation. Those patients who were initially depressed or treated while euthymic showed no significant changes. Patients as a group displayed significant decreases in weight and BMI from topiramate initiation to week 4, to week 10, and to the last evaluation. The most common adverse side effects were neurologic and gastrointestinal. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary open observations of adjunctive topiramate treatment suggest that it may have antimanic or anticycling effects in some patients with bipolar disorder, and may be associated with appetite suppression and weight loss that is often viewed as beneficial by the patient and clinician. Controlled studies of topiramate's acute and long-term efficacy and side effects in bipolar disorder appear warranted.     

Safety and tolerability of emerging pharmacological treatments for bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES: Over the past few years numerous new agents have been examined for their efficacy in bipolar disorder (BPD). New antiepileptic agents and atypical antipsychotics currently form the bulk of these emerging agents. As the armamentarium for treating BPD increases, it allows for the possibility of choosing drugs on the basis of their tolerability as well as their efficacy, rather than on efficacy alone. METHODS: Efficacy data for newer antiepileptic drugs (lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine) and atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole) are briefly reviewed. The article focuses on relative safety and tolerability of these agents. RESULTS: In general, most of these newer agents have better side effect and tolerability profiles than older agents commonly used to treat BPD (lithium, valproate, carbamazepine); however, these must be weighed against efficacy demonstrated to date in randomized, controlled trials. Cognitive impairment is a concern with topiramate, weight gain and risk of diabetes with some of the atypical antipsychotic agents, and rash with lamotrigine. CONCLUSIONS: Side effects of newer emerging agents for the treatment of BPD can be effectively managed and the risks reduced by instituting practical strategies early in management.     

Treatment of bulimia nervosa with topiramate in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, part 1: improvement in binge and purge measures

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate in bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Patients with DSM-IV bulimia nervosa were randomly assigned in equal proportions to receive topiramate (N = 35) or placebo (N = 34) for 10 weeks (between April 1999 and Dec. 2000). Topiramate treatment was started at 25 mg/day and titrated by 25 to 50 mg/week to a maximum of 400 mg/day. The primary efficacy measure was mean weekly number of binge and/or purge days. Related outcome measures included mean weekly number of binge days and binge frequency, as well as mean weekly number of purge days and purge frequency. RESULTS: Sixty-four outpatients (33 placebo, 31 topiramate) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median topiramate dose was 100 mg/day (range, 25-400 mg/day). Mean +/- SD baseline number of weekly binge and/or purge days was 5.0 +/- 1.6 for topiramate patients and 5.1 +/- 1.5 for placebo patients. The primary efficacy measure, mean weekly number of binge and/or purge days, decreased 44.8% from baseline with topiramate versus 10.7% with placebo (p =.004). The mean weekly number of binge days decreased 48.2% with topiramate versus 17.7% with placebo (p =.015), and mean binge frequency decreased 49.2% with topiramate versus 28.0% with placebo (p =.071). The mean weekly number of purge days decreased 43.4% with topiramate versus 16.6% with placebo (p =.016), and mean purge frequency decreased 49.8% with topiramate versus 21.6% with placebo (p =.016). Three patients (2 placebo, 1 topiramate) discontinued from the trial due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Topiramate was associated with significant improvements in both binge and purge symptoms in this study population and represents a potential treatment for bulimia nervosa.     

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Topiramate YTC Study Group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Topiramate is effective as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. The efficacy and safety of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Eighty patients, 3 to 59 years old, who experienced three or more PGTC seizures during an 8-week baseline phase were randomly assigned to treatment with either topiramate (n = 39) or placebo (n = 41). Topiramate was titrated to target doses of approximately 6 mg/kg/day over 8 weeks and maintained for another 12 weeks. RESULTS: The median percentage reduction from baseline in PGTC seizure rate was 56.7% for topiramate patients and 9.0% for placebo patients (p = 0.019). The proportion of patients with 50% or higher reduction in PGTC seizure rate was 22/39 (56%) and 8/40 (20%) for the topiramate and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The median percentage reduction in the rate of all generalized seizures was 42.1% for topiramate patients and 0.9% for placebo patients (p = 0.003). The proportions of patients with 50% or higher reductions in generalized seizure rate were 18/39 (46%) and 7/41 (17%) for the topiramate and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.003). The most common adverse events were somnolence, fatigue, weight loss, difficulty with memory, and nervousness. Treatment-limiting adverse events occurred in one patient in the topiramate group (anorexia and weight loss) and one in the placebo group (granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia). CONCLUSION: Topiramate is well-tolerated and effective for the adjunctive treatment of PGTC seizures.     

Topiramate as an adjuvant treatment with atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenic patients experiencing weight gain

Schizophrenic patients commonly suffer weight gain, which is often associated with widely prescribed antipsychotic medicines. It is distressing to most patients who experience it and may affect their response to treatment of schizophrenia. Weight gain is also associated with treatment noncompliance and several medical conditions. This study explored the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate as an adjuvant treatment of patients with schizophrenia who were carrying excess weight. In this 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled prospective study, 66 hospitalized patients with schizophrenia who were carrying excess weight were given topiramate at doses of 100 mg/day or 200 mg/day, or a placebo. The primary measures made were body weight, body mass index, waist measurement, hip measurement, and waist-to-hip ratio. Safety measures included physical examinations and the monitoring of adverse effects, clinical laboratory data, and vital signs. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were used to quantify changes in schizophrenic symptoms and signs. In the 200-mg/day topiramate group, body weight, body mass index, waist measurement, and hip measurement decreased significantly compared with the 100-mg/day topiramate and placebo groups over 12 weeks. However, the waist-to-hip ratio did not change in any group. Scores on the CGI-S and BPRS decreased significantly over the 12-week period in both topiramate groups, but the decrease was not clinically meaningful. These results suggest that a higher dose of topiramate is efficacious as an adjuvant treatment of patients with schizophrenia experiencing excess weight gain. Further clinical research is required to establish guidelines for the use of topiramate as an antiobesity agent in schizophrenic patients.     

Treatment of binge-eating disorder with topiramate: a clinical case series

BACKGROUND: Reduced appetite and weight loss were found in clinical trials of topiramate for epilepsy. Binge-eating disorder is characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating that are not associated with regular use of inappropriate compensatory behaviors. Overweight and obesity may be common complications. To explore the effectiveness and tolerability of topiramate in binge-eating disorder, we describe the response of 13 consecutive outpatients with binge-eating disorder to naturalistic, open-label treatment with topiramate. METHOD: The response of 13 female outpatients with binge-eating disorder by DSM-IV criteria to naturalistic, open-label treatment with topiramate (100-1400 mg/day) was reviewed. Response of binge-eating disorder symptoms was clinically assessed as none, mild, moderate, marked, or remission. Weight and side effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: All 13 patients had comorbid Axis I psychiatric disorders along with binge-eating disorder and were receiving psychotropic medications at the time of topiramate administration. After beginning topiramate treatment, 9 patients displayed a moderate or better response of binge-eating disorder symptoms that was maintained for periods ranging from 3 to 30 months (mean +/- SD = 18.7+/-8.0 months). Two other patients displayed moderate or marked responses that subsequently diminished. The remaining 2 patients had a mild or no response. The mean +/- SD weight of the 13 patients decreased from 99.3+/-26.4 kg to 87.5+/-20.4 kg (z = -2.4, df = 1, p = .02), but only 7 patients lost > or = 5 kg of weight. The mean topiramate treatment dose was 492.3+/-467.8 mg/day for all 13 patients. The mean topiramate dose was higher in patients who lost > or = 5 kg than in patients who lost < 5 kg. Also, topiramate dose correlated significantly with weight loss (p < .01). In general, topiramate was well tolerated, with neurologic side effects the most common. Of 3 patients who discontinued topiramate because of side effects, 2 resumed the drug at a later date without significant recurrence of these effects. CONCLUSION: Topiramate may be an effective treatment for binge-eating disorder. Controlled studies of topiramate in binge-eating disorder appear warranted.     

Topiramate in the long-term treatment of binge-eating disorder associated with obesity

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of topiramate in binge-eating disorder (BED) with obesity. METHOD: Sixty-one patients with BED (DSM-IV-TR criteria) and obesity enrolled in a 14-week, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Completers (N = 35) were offered participation in a 42-week, open-label extension trial of topiramate. Fifteen patients who received topiramate and 16 patients who received placebo in the double-blind study entered the open-label trial. Topiramate was titrated from 25 mg/day to a maximum of 600 mg/day. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to final visit in weekly binge frequency using the last observation carried forward for all patients who received topiramate. Baseline for patients receiving double-blind topiramate was the beginning of the controlled study; for patients receiving placebo, baseline was the beginning of the open-label trial. Open-label data were gathered from December 1998 to November 2000. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (31 who received topiramate in the open-label trial plus 13 who received topiramate in the double-blind study only) received at least 1 dose of topiramate; 43 patients provided outcome measures at a median final dose of 250 mg/day. Mean weekly binge frequency declined significantly from baseline to final visit for all 43 patients (-3.2; p < .001), for the 15 patients who received topiramate during the controlled and open-label studies (-4.0; p < .001), and for the 15 patients who received topiramate only during the open-label trial (-2.5; p = .044). Patients also exhibited statistically significant reduction in body weight. The most common reasons for topiramate discontinuation were protocol nonadherence (N = 17) and adverse events (N = 14). CONCLUSION: Topiramate treatment was associated with enduring improvement in some patients with BED and obesity but was also associated with a high discontinuation rate.     

Topiramate in Bipolar and Schizoaffective Disorders: Weight Loss and Efficacy

BACKGROUND: Although useful in bipolar disorder, mood stabilizers, such as lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine, can cause significant weight gain. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 5 patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder who were treated with topiramate as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy. RESULTS: All 5 patients had a good response to treatment at a mean topiramate dose of 195 mg/day (range, 100-375 mg/day). All patients lost a substantial amount of weight on topiramate treatment. The average weight loss was 22 lb (10 kg; range, 8-56 lb [4-25 kg]). None of the patients discontinued topiramate because of side effects. CONCLUSION: Topiramate may represent a valuable alternative to existing mood stabilizers, either as an adjunct or as monotherapy in patients with bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in adult patients with refractory partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult Chinese patients with refractory partial epilepsy were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: A total of 46 patients who had four or more complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization within an 8-week baseline phase were enrolled. Patients were assigned randomly to receive TPM (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23). TPM or placebo was titrated to target doses of 300 mg/d for 6 weeks and maintained at stabilized levels for another 8 weeks. Concomitant antiepileptic drugs remained at constant previous levels during the trial. RESULTS: In all, 41 patients completed the trial (TPM group, n = 20; placebo group, n = 21). The proportion of patients with a > or =50% reduction from baseline in complex partial seizures was 11 of 23 (47.8%) in the TPM group and 3 of 23 (13.0%) in the placebo group (p = 0.01). In addition, patients treated with TPM had significantly better investigator (p = 0.014) and patient (p = 0.0005) global assessment scores than patients in the placebo group. Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Two patients with TPM therapy complained of weight loss. Routine blood cell counts and other laboratory results showed no significant changes from baseline in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: TPM 300 mg/d is effective and well tolerated as treatment for refractory partial epilepsy in adults.     

A 24-week, randomized, controlled trial of adjunctive sibutramine versus topiramate in the treatment of weight gain in overweight or obese patients with bipolar disorders

OBJECTIVES: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) have an increased risk of obesity as well as psychotropic-associated weight gain. The objective of this study was to compare sibutramine and topiramate as adjunctive treatments for psychotropic-associated weight gain in overweight or obese outpatients with BD. METHODS: In this 24-week, open-label, flexible-dose, comparison trial, 46 outpatients with bipolar disorders who had a body mass index (BMI) > or =30 kg/m(2), or > or =27 kg/m(2) with obesity-related comorbidities, and psychotropic-associated weight gain were randomly assigned to receive sibutramine (n = 18; 5-15 mg/day) or topiramate (n = 28; 25-600 mg/day). The primary outcome measure was weight loss. Secondary measures included changes in BMI, percent body weight loss, and mood symptoms. RESULTS: Patients randomized either to sibutramine or topiramate lost comparable amounts of weight (4.1 +/- 5.7 and 2.8 +/- 3.5 kg, respectively) and displayed similar rates of weight loss (0.85 and 0.82 kg/week, respectively). However, only four (22%) patients receiving sibutramine and six (21%) patients receiving topiramate completed the 24-week trial. In addition, the attrition patterns for the two drugs were different, with patients discontinuing topiramate doing so early in treatment and patients discontinuing sibutramine doing so throughout treatment. Also, higher ratings of manic and depressive symptoms significantly increased risk for early topiramate discontinuation compared to that for sibutramine. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive sibutramine and topiramate may have comparable weight loss effects in overweight or obese bipolar patients with psychotropic-associated weight gain, but are each associated with similarly high discontinuation rates. In addition, they may have different attrition profiles. Compared to sibutramine, discontinuation of topiramate may be more likely to occur early in treatment and may be more dependent upon manic and depressive symptoms.     

Topiramate or valproate in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a randomized open-label comparison

Few randomized, controlled trials evaluating antiepileptic drug (AED) efficacy and tolerability have focused solely on patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). We conducted a pilot, randomized controlled trial comparing topiramate (N=19) and valproate (N=9) in adolescents/adults with JME to evaluate clinical response when these broad-spectrum agents are titrated to optimal effect. Rating scales were used to systematically assess tolerability. Among patients completing 26 weeks of treatment, 8 of 12 (67%) in the topiramate group and 4 of 7 (57%) in the valproate group were seizure-free during the 12-week maintenance period. Median daily dose was 250mg topiramate or 750mg valproate. Two (11%) topiramate-treated patients and one (11%) valproate-treated patient discontinued due to adverse events. Systemic toxicity scores, but not neurotoxicity scores, differed substantially between the two groups; greater systemic toxicity was associated with valproate. Our preliminary findings that topiramate may be an effective, well-tolerated alternative to valproate warrant validation in a double-blind trial.     

Clozapine-induced weight gain: prevalence and clinical relevance.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical relevance of weight gain during clozapine treatment. Previous reports indicated clinically significant weight gain in 13% to 85% of patients and an average gain of 9.0 to 24.7 lb. METHOD: Twenty-one state hospital patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were weighed weekly for 12 weeks before clozapine treatment and during the first 16 weeks of treatment. Psychiatric symptoms were rated with a modified version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: The mean weight gain for the entire group was 13.9 lb, or 8.9% of body weight. During the 16 weeks of clozapine treatment, 38% of the patients experienced marked weight gains and 29% had moderate weight gains. The improvements in BPRS total score and composite negative symptom score were significantly greater for the eight patients with marked weight gains than for the other 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine's propensity to induce weight gain may relate to the drug's efficacy and/or its unique neuropharmacologic effects. Increased attention to this phenomenon is important because of the morbidity associated with obesity.     

Topiramate treatment for SSRI-induced weight gain in anxiety disorders

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), have been associated with significant weight gain, a problem that frequently leads to noncompliance and premature discontinuation of treatment. Topiramate is a novel anticonvulsant that has also been used as a mood stabilizer and augmentation agent in mood disorders. Topiramate has been observed to have an interesting side effect of weight loss in some individuals. In this study, topiramate was added to the treatment regimen of patients with a primary DSM-IV anxiety disorder who had experienced substantial SSRI-induced weight gain, in an attempt to induce weight loss. METHOD: Topiramate was added to SSRI treatment in 15 anxiety disorder patients, starting at a dose of 50 mg/day and titrating up to a target daily dose of 100 mg/day, with a maximum dose of 250 mg/day. Subjects' weight was measured at baseline and after 5 and 10 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Before topiramate treatment, SSRI-treated subjects in this sample had gained a mean of 13.0 +/- 8.4 kg (28.6 +/- 18.5 lb). After the addition of a mean dose of 135.0 +/- 44.1 mg/day of topiramate for approximately 10 weeks, subjects lost a mean of 4.2 +/- 6.0 kg (9.3 +/- 13.3 lb). CONCLUSION: Topiramate may have a role in managing SSRI-induced weight gain in anxiety disorder patients.     

Long-term topiramate treatment of psychotropic drug-induced weight gain: a retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of long-term topiramate treatment of psychotropic drug-induced weight gain. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of the charts of patients treated with add-on topiramate in order to control weight gain induced by psychotropic drugs (antipsychotic drugs, lithium or valproate). RESULTS: The case series consisted of 100 patients. The mean final dose of topiramate was 186.8+/-138.3 mg/day, whereas the median dose was 200 mg/day for a total treatment duration of 41+/-38 weeks. Adverse events led to topiramate discontinuation in 22% of the sample. A significant reduction in body mass index was observed between the first and last measures, from 29.7+/-3.6 to 28+/-3.3 (t=5.82, P<.0005). The reduction in body mass index was greater in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs than in those treated with lithium or valproate alone. No difference was found between subjects with and those without comorbid active substance abuse or dependence. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective case series, topiramate was found to be effective in reversing weight gain associated with antipsychotic drugs, lithium or valproate. Tolerability of topiramate was an issue in some patients.     

Effects of nefazodone on body weight: a pooled analysis of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor- and imipramine-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that the newer antidepressant drugs may differ with respect to their effects on body weight, especially during long-term treatment. However, the published data about treatment-emergent weight change with the newer antidepressants are limited. Most reports of unexpected selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-associated weight gain are anecdotal or from small controlled trials. To determine if differences exist among the newer antidepressants, the authors retrospectively analyzed data from clinical trials comparing nefazodone with SSRIs and with imipramine. METHOD: Weight change data supplied by Bristol-Myers Squibb from 6 completed clinical trials comparing the antidepressant nefazodone (N = 523) with 3 SSRIs, fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine (N = 513), as well as 3 trials comparing nefazodone (N = 225) with the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (N = 224) were analyzed. In all studies, nefazodone was found to be equal in efficacy to the comparator antidepressants. Studies that included both acute and long-term treatment phases were included in the analysis. Acute phases of the trials lasted either 6 or 8 weeks, and long-term phases varied in duration from 16 to 46 weeks. The analysis included summarizing the number and percentage of patients in each group with a > or = 7% change in body weight from baseline at any point in the long-term and acute phases, at endpoint, and at week 16 of the long-term phases. RESULTS: Using 7% or greater weight change as the measure of clinical significance, 4.3% of SSRI-treated patients had lost weight at any point in the acute phase versus 1.7% of those treated with nefazodone (p = .017). However, at any point during the long-term phase, significantly more SSRI-treated patients than nefazodone-treated patients showed a significant increase in body weight (17.9% vs. 8.3%; p = .003). At any point in the acute phase, significantly more imipramine-treated patients than nefazodone-treated patients had a 7% or greater increase in body weight (4.9% vs. 0.9%; p = .027), and for the long-term phase the comparison yielded 24.5% versus 9.5%. The difference during the long-term phase was statistically significant in women (p = .017), but not in men (p = .078) due to the small numbers of men in each group. CONCLUSION: SSRIs caused more weight loss during short-term treatment but more weight gain during long-term treatment. These results lend support to the observation that some antidepressants have a greater expected risk of weight gain than others during long-term therapy.     

Effect of clozapine on serum leptin,insulin levels,and body weight and composition in patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: Weight gain frequently occurs during treatment with clozapine. However, the pathophysiology of clozapine-induced weight gain remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of clozapine on hormones leptin and insulin in relation to body weight and composition measures to determine their contribution to clozapine-induced weight gain. METHOD: Data are reported on 19 patients with schizophrenia (11 women and 8 men) who completed 10 weeks of treatment with clozapine. Insulin levels, weight measurements, body mass index (BMI), and body composition measurements were evaluated at baseline and at the end of treatment. Leptin levels were assessed at baseline and after 4 and 10 weeks of treatment. Analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to evaluate changes in weight, body composition measures, leptin, and insulin. The Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationships between changes in hormone levels and weight along with body composition measurements. The correlations of change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score with changes in hormone levels, weight gain and body composition measures were evaluated with Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Leptin and insulin levels did not show any significant alterations across time. The use of clozapine was associated with significant increases in BMI (F=19.8, P<.001), lean muscle mass (F=8.2, P=.01), and fat mass (F=15.4, P=.001), while total body fluid percentage (F=4.1, P=.05) significantly decreased. Improvement in PANSS scores was not correlated to change in leptin, insulin, weight, BMI, or body composition measurements. The change in leptin levels was correlated to change in body fat mass. CONCLUSION: The role of leptin in weight gain induced by clozapine might be a regulatory mechanism rather than being etiologic.     

Topiramate treatment of aggression in female borderline personality disorder patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of topiramate versus placebo in the treatment of aggression in women who meet the criteria for borderline personality disorder. METHOD: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in 29 female subjects (response rate 93.5%) meeting SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV) criteria for borderline personality disorder. The subjects were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to topiramate (N = 21, analysis based on N = 19) or placebo (N = 10). Treatment lasted 8 weeks (November 2003-January 2004). Primary outcome measures were self-reported changes on the anger subscales of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). RESULTS: Significant improvements on 4 subscales of the STAXI (state-anger, trait-anger, anger-out, anger-control) were observed in the topiramate-treated subjects after 8 weeks, in comparison with the placebo group. The difference in improvement in score between the 2 groups for state-anger, trait-anger, and anger-out ranged from 21% to 24%, and the difference for anger-control was -13%. As an exception, a difference of only 8.5% (p < .2) was found on the anger-in subscale. Significantly greater weight loss was observed in the topiramate-treated group than in those treated with placebo (difference in weight loss between the 2 groups: 2.3 kg [5.1 lb] [3.2%]; 95% CI = 1.3% to 4.4%, p < .01). All patients tolerated topiramate well. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate appears to be a safe and effective agent in the treatment of anger in women with borderline personality disorder as defined by SCID criteria. Additionally, significant weight loss can be expected.