Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.

Bone mineral content (BMC, g) using DEXA (Lunar DPX) was measured on known hydroxyapatite samples in a water bath in the presence of uniform and nonuniform covering of fat-equivalent materials. Selective placement of paraffin over bone had a greater effect than lard in reducing apparent BMC, and polycarbonate plastic had a lesser effect. Measured BMC was 100.1 +/- 1.1% of actual hydroxyapatite weight when (1) fat over bone was about twice the mass of hydroxyapatite, and (2) the surrounding soft tissue was 15-30% fat. There was a linear relationship between observed and expected BMC, area (cm2), and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) measured on an aluminum phantom using either the Lunar DPX or the Hologic QDR-1000. The measured area with the two densitometers was identical, but BMC differed. For both an anthropomorphic phantom and human subjects, use of a constant-threshold (0.2 g/cm2) edge-detection algorithm excluded less low-density bone from the transverse processes than the standard DPX edge-detection algorithm. Differences in edge detection could influence the results obtained with phantoms and in vivo and make system intercomparison difficult.     

Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.

This study evaluated the performance of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with regard to (1) the correlation with dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), (2) the ability to discriminate between normal and osteoporotic patients, and (3) long-term reproducibility. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine in 112 subjects, both normal and osteoporotic, was measured with DPA and DEXA (Lunar Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin) of the spine. The femur BMD of 22 cases was also measured with both machines. The results for the two techniques were highly correlated (r greater than 0.9, SEM = 0.02 to 0.04 g/cm2). BMD was measured using DEXA in 80 women (mean age = 61 years) with established spinal osteoporosis and 110 normal age-matched controls. The osteoporotic patients had significantly reduced spine and femur BMDs compared to the controls: -23% for L2-4 BMD (Z score = 2.6) and -13 to -20% for femur BMD (Z score = 1.1-1.3). L2-4 BMD had the best discriminative value, with an area under the ROC curve of 94%; the Ward's triangle BMD had an area of 84%. The precision error in vitro in a phantom over a 1-year period was 0.7%. The measured precision in vivo with young adults was approximately 1% (SD = 0.012 g/cm2) for L2-4 BMD and 1.7-2.3% (SD = 0.015-0.022 g/cm2) for femur over the 1 year period. The reproducibility was not as good for osteoporotic patients (SD = 0.017 g/cm2).     

Comparative evaluation of the DPX and DPX-IQ lunar densitometer systems following software upgrade.

Bone densitometry research departments perform system and software upgrades infrequently in order to maintain high precision. This study compares the results obtained on a Lunar densitometer with DPX, and DPX-IQ installed to achieve year 2000 compliance. The DPX-IQ provides an improved femur edge detection algorithm with an expanded reference database. Two hundred data files for each measurement site acquired on DPX were reanalyzed on DPX-IQ. There was no change to the bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), T-scores or Z-scores for the L2-L4 spine, radius (ultradistal and 33%), and total body. There was a significant high correlation for the femoral neck BMD (r = 0.98; p < 0.05). The mean differences in BMD, BMC, T-scores, and Z-scores at the femoral neck and Ward's and trochanteric regions were not significant (p > 0.05). The limits of agreement within the 95% confidence interval for the femoral neck BMD using the Bland and Altman method was between -0.057 and 0.063 g/cm(2). This order of magnitude magnifies the long-term precision error and alters the usual confidence limits for interpretation of true change in densitometry practice. Therefore, it is important for reanalysis of DPX data files with the DPX-IQ to be performed so that longitudinal changes in BMD can be accurately assessed.     

Do Young New Zealand Pacific Island and European Children Differ in Bone Size or Bone Mineral?

Although Pacific Island adults have been shown to have larger bones and greater bone mineral density than caucasians, no previous studies have been undertaken to determine whether differences are present in prepubertal children. Forty-one Pacific Island children (both parents of Pacific Island descent) and 38 European children, aged 3 to 7 years, living in New Zealand were studied. Heights and weights were determined by simple anthropometry and body mass index (BMI, kg/m²) was calculated. Body composition, bone size, and bone mineral content (BMC, g) were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the total body and the non-dominant forearm. Compared to European children, in data adjusted for age and gender, Pacific Island children had significantly greater (P < 0.05) BMC in the total body (12%), the ultradistal radius (16%), and the 33% radius (8%), and also greater total body bone area (10%). Bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm²) was higher only at the ultradistal radius (11%). However, after adjustment for body weight, in particular lean mass, no differences were seen between Pacific Island and European children in any bone measure. The larger bone area and BMC of young Pacific Island children can be explained by their greater height and weight. Therefore, this study has shown that prepubertal Pacific Island children do not have greater bone size or BMC for their weight.Grant Support: Otago Medical Research Foundation.     

Influence of Strontium on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Mineral Content Measurements by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry

The presence of Sr in bone influences bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This interaction is of interest, since strontium ranelate (S12911) demonstrated positive effects on bone metabolism in various animal models of osteoporosis, and is currently being evaluated for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The present in vitro study aimed to determine adjustment factors for DXA measurements of BMC and BMD at different Sr concentrations in order to estimate the corresponding values that would have been measured without Sr. A series of mixtures of Ca and Sr hydroxyapatites were prepared, with biologically relevant Sr/Ca ratios ranging from 0 to 3.5 mol/mol%, and a constant total concentration of divalent cations (145 mmol). The mixtures were conditioned in plastic dishes 4.5 cm in diameter, to obtain an areal density close to the human vertebral mineral density of 0.7-1.1 g/cm(2). DXA measurements of the mixtures were made with a wide range of different instruments and various acquisition modes. A direct linear relationship (r(2) > 0.99) was found between strontium content and overestimation of BMD and BMC. There were no significant differences in adjustment factors for BMC or BMD between the different machines or acquisition modes, and the presence of Sr in the water bath used to mimic soft tissues did not affect the accuracy and precision of the method. This demonstrates that reliable DXA determinations of BMD may be carried out in the presence of Sr, and may be interpreted in terms of calcium hydroxyapatite equivalent if the bone Sr content of the measured bone is known. The same adjustment factor (10% overestimation for 1 mol/mol% Sr) can be used for all presently available types of instrument and acquisition modes.     

Normative bone mineral density data at multiple skeletal sites in Indian subjects

Summary

Age-related change in bone mineral density (BMD) varied according to skeletal site in Indian subjects. A larger proportion of subjects was classified as osteoporotic and osteopenic using the Caucasian database than newly derived peak BMD values at most skeletal sites. Results establish useful normative data for reliable interpretations of individual dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) values

Introduction

Osteoporosis is believed to occur at a relatively younger age in the Indian population. With increasing knowledge on significant differences in BMD between various racial groups, there is increased emphasis for the use of population-specific reference database.

Methods

BMD at multiple skeletal sites was measured using DEXA (Prodigy, Lunar) in 615 Indian women (20–86 years) and 489 Indian men (20–83 years). Best-fit models were drawn for each skeletal site. Osteopenia and osteoporosis diagnosis rates were calculated using Caucasian and derived Indian peak BMD values.

Results

Age-related change in BMD varied with skeletal site in both sexes. Peak BMD in women was observed between 31 and 40 years of age at the hip, spine, and radius 33% and between 20 and 30 years at the ultradistal radius. Peak BMD in men was attained between 20 and 30 years at the hip and radius 33% and between 31 and 40 years at the spine and ultradistal radius. A larger proportion of Indian subjects was classified as osteoporotic and osteopenic based on the Caucasian database than newly derived Indian peak BMD values at all skeletal sites except radius 33% and femoral neck in females above 40 years of age.

Conclusion

Results establish useful normative data for the Indian population for reliable interpretations of individual DEXA values.     

Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry

Both dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) using 153Gd and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) can be used for measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the total skeleton and its seven major regions. The short-term precision (coefficient of variation, CV) of DEXA for total-body BMD using the medium (20 minute) and fast (10 minute) speeds was 0.34 and 0.68% in 5 normal subjects; the corresponding CV in 5 osteoporotic females were 0.70 and 1.04%. The CV for BMD using DPA was 0.82% in 8 normal subjects and 0.70% in 12 osteoporotic patients. The CV for regional BMD using DPA was similar to fast-speed DEXA, without significant differences (p NS); precision with medium-speed DEXA was superior to DPA, and the differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.05) for head, spine, trunk, ribs, and pelvis. Total-body measurements using both DPA and DEXA were done on 99 subjects (84 females and 15 males). Significant correlations (r = 0.98; p less than 0.001) were found between DEXA and DPA measurements of both BMC and BMD. There were also significant correlations (r = 0.94-0.98; p less than 0.001) between DEXA and DPA measurements of anatomic regions (head, trunk, spine, pelvis, ribs, arms, and legs). DPA and DEXA results for BMD of total skeleton, ribs, pelvis, and legs were similar (p NS), and statistically significant differences were found in head, spine, and arm measurements (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.01, and p less than 0.05, respectively); regression equations allowed adjustment of DEXA values in patients already measured with the earlier DPA method.     

Bone geometry, density, and strength indices of the distal radius reflect loading via childhood gymnastic activity.

The distal radius bears unique forces during gymnastic activity. Its relatively simple anatomy, minimal soft tissue envelope, and varied composition make the distal radius ideal for evaluating the effects of loading on bone properties. For 56 premenarcheal gymnasts and nongymnasts, ultradistal and 1/3 distal radius DXA scans measured bone mineral content (BMC), areal bone mineral density, and projected area. Simplified geometric models were used to generate bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), geometric indices, strength indices, and fall strength ratios. Ratios of regional BMC vs total body fat-free mass (FFM) were calculated. Separate Tanner I and II analyses of covariance adjusted bone parameters for age and height. Ratios were compared using maturity-matched analyses of variance. At the 1/3 region, periosteal width, BMC, cortical cross-sectional area, and section modulus were greater in gymnasts than nongymnasts (p<0.05); 1/3 BMAD means were equivalent. Ultradistal BMAD, BMC, and index for structural strength in axial compression were higher in gymnasts than nongymnasts; ultradistal periosteal width was only larger in Tanner I gymnasts. Fall strength ratios and BMC/FFM ratios were greater in gymnasts (p<0.05). Geometric and volumetric responses to mechanical loading are site specific during late childhood and early adolescence.     

Forearm Single X-Ray Absorptiometry in the Identification of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis at the Hip and Spine: A Correlation Study

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has stated that forearm bone mineral density (BMD) testing combined with a thorough clinical evaluation may be an option for the diagnosis of osteoporosis when central bone density (CBD) testing is not available. This study assessed the performance of two different forearm sites in identifying subjects with spinal and femoral osteoporosis, and defined the 90% sensitivity point for the DTX-100 bone densitometer in the detection of central osteoporosis. Four hundred and two postmenopausal Bulgarian women between the ages of 50 and 81 yr (mean age 60.24 +/- 10.48 yr) participated in this study. Forearm BMD (distal and ultradistal forearm) was measured with a DTX-100 device (Osteometer Meditech, USA) and central BMD (lumbar spine and proximal femur) with a Hologic QDR 4500 A device. Linear T-score correlations among sites, sensitivity and specificity of the forearm site were analyzed. T-score correlations between the forearm and the central sites ranged from 0.32 to 0.69 (p < or = 0.05 for all correlations in age group 50-59). The forearm site sensitivity increased slightly with advancing age, but specificity decreased. When the distal forearm BMD cut point (0.340 g/cm2) was set to achieve 90% sensitivity to identify total hip osteoporosis, specificity was 40%; when the distal forearm BMD cut point (0.410 g/cm2) was set to achieve 90% sensitivity to identify spinal osteoporosis, specificity was 55.4%; when ultradistal forearm BMD cut points (0.280 and 0.320 g/cm2) were set to achieve 90% sensitivity to identify total hip and spinal osteoporosis, specificity was 40.8 and 59.2%, respectively. Forearm bone density measures may be useful to selectively screen for patients with central osteoporosis.     

In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers

Summary Six Hologic QDR-1000 DEXA bone densitometers at different centers across the USA were compared to determine the intermachine variability. Nine scans in succession were acquired on each machine using a single anthropomorphic lumbar spine phantom (manufactured by Hologic). Values for BMC, area, and BMD were recorded for each measurement. Means, standard deviations (SD), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each machine. All the CVs (BMC, area, BMD) were less than 1% (range 0.3%–0.6%). The CV of the means at the six sites were 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.5% for BMC, area, and BMD, respectively. Although several significant differences for BMC, area, and BMD were noted by ANOVA between machines at different sites, the difference between the highest and lowest means of the individual machines was only 1.1%, 1.31%, and 1.07% for BMC, area, and BMD. The small variations between the DEXA systems are encouraging for researchers involved in multicenter trials in which data are pooled.     

Forearm bone mass and biochemical markers of bone remodelling in normal Chinese women

We studied bone mineral content and density (BMC/BMD) and bone turnover markers in normal Chinese women from the age of 20 to 80 years and compared the data with those for normal women from the Western part of the world (Denmark). In all subjects (5 at each age;n=305) BMC and BMD were determined at three sites of the nondominant forearm with single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA). In addition, 10 women had five repeated measurements to determine the reproducibility of the equipment, demonstrating coefficients of variation of 1%–2% depending on the measurement site. The Chinese premenopausal women were on the average heavier (1 kg) than the postmenopausal women, but they were also taller (6 cm). The postmenopausal women had highly significantly less bone mass than the premenopausal women; 15% at the 1/4-distal site, 25% at the 8-mm-distal site, and 35% at the ultradistal site. At age 50, bone mass in Chinese women was very similar to that of a comparable group of Danish women. After age 50, bone loss accelerated and the rate of loss seemed more rapid in the Chinese than in the Danish women. Within the first 5 postmenopausal years, the most cortical part decreased by approximately 3.9%, the mixed cortical and trabecular site by 9.5%, and the mainly trabecular site by 16.2%. In the following 5 years the decreases were 6.3%, 5.5%, and 6.6%, respectively, and 5.6%, 11.3%, and 8.9% for year 11–15 after menopause. The bone decrement continued throughout the 25th year of menopause, and except for the ultradistal site, the rate of loss did not change very much. The postmenopausal women had highly significantly higher levels of all bone turnover markers than premenopausal women. The markers stayed high at all ages. We conclude that the present study gives the normal values of Chinese women's bone mass at three sites of the distal forearm. The data were collected in a way which allows them to be used as reference for normal Chinese women. The data demonstrate that women from the East and West are relatively similar in terms of bone mass.     

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.

Although single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) has been the predominant tool used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in the forearm, the development of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) provides the benefits of greater source stability, reduced scanning time, and improved image resolution compared to SPA. In the present study we used the DEXA bone densitometer (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA) to (1) measure BMD in the one-third radius and ultradistal radius; (2) examine the reproducibility of these BMD measurements; and (3) compare the BMD at the one-third radius with SPA (SP2, Lunar Corp., Madison, WI). In 65 normal women (ages 22-74 years) we examined changes in the forearm DEXA BMD with age, revealing significant quadratic regression equations. The reproducibility of DEXA BMD (mean +/- SEM) in 7 normal subjects aged 22-50 years is 0.85 +/- 0.16% for the predominantly cortical one-third radius site and 0.97 +/- 0.15% for the more trabecular ultradistal site. The regression relationship between DEXA and SPA of the one-third radius in 26 subjects (ages 22-68 years) is DEXA BMD = 0.105 + 0.826 (SPA BMD); R = 0.97, R2 = 0.94, p less than 0.0001. Bone densitometry of the forearm using DEXA may be performed relatively rapidly, providing reproducibility and image resolution that are generally superior to those observed with SPA.     

Bone mineral density in prepubertal obese and control children: relation to body weight,lean mass,and fat mass

The aim of the study was to determine the influence of obesity on bone status in prepubertal children. This study included 20 obese prepubertal children (10.7 +/- 1.2 years old) and 23 maturation-matched controls (10.9 +/- 1.1 years old). Bone mineral area, bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and calculation of bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) at the whole body and lumbar spine (L1-L4) and body composition (lean mass and fat mass) were assessed by DXA. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) at the calcaneus were measured with a BUA imaging device. Expressed as crude values, DXA measurements of BMD at all bone sites and BUA (69.30 versus 59.63 dB/MHz, P < 0.01) were higher in obese children. After adjustment for body weight and lean mass, obese children displayed lower values of whole-body BMD (0.88 versus 0.96 g/cm2, P < 0.05) and BMC (1190.98 versus 1510.24 g, P < 0.01) in comparison to controls. When results were adjusted for fat mass, there was no statistical difference between obese and control children for DXA and ultrasound results. Moreover, whole-body BMAD was lower (0.086 versus 0.099 g/cm3, P < 0.0001), whereas lumbar spine BMAD was greater (0.117 versus 0.100 g/cm3, P < 0.001) in obese children. Thus, it was observed that, in obese children, cortical and trabecular bone displayed different adaptation patterns to their higher body weight. Cortical bone seems to enhance both size and BMC and trabecular bone to enhance BMC. Finally, considering total body weight and lean mass of obese children, these skeletal responses were not sufficient to compensate for the excess load on the whole body.     

Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins

Gender difference in bone size is a potential confounder when comparing bone density between males and females. A comparison of volumetric BMD (vBMD) between men and women, which is a measure of bone mass relative to three-dimensional bone volume (g/cm³) as opposed to areal bone density (g/cm²), may be a more accurate reflection of gender differences in bone density. The aims of this study were to examine gender differences in bone mass (BMC), areal BMD (aBMD), volumetric BMD (vBMD) by comparing twins of opposite sex in whom the effects of age, genes and environment are partially controlled for. DEXA derived BMC, aBMD, vBMD at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), femoral neck (FN) and forearm (1/3 radius) were compared between 82 opposite sex pairs aged 18–80. BMC was significantly higher in males at all three sites (26–45.5%). For aBMD the gender differences remained significant at all sites except the spine. The average differences in aBMD were not as great as the differences in BMC (2.2–20.5%). The differences in vBMD, however, followed a different pattern. FN and L3 vBMD were significantly higher in females (4.8 and 0.6%, respectively), while radial BMD was not significantly different between the sexes. Comparing aBMD values between males and females, when females in general have a smaller skeleton than males may not be a true indication of gender differences in bone density. A comparison of vBMD between men and women shows only small differences in bone density between the sexes.     

Mineral content of upper tibia assessed by dual photon densitometry

Bone mineral content (BMC, g/cm) and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) of the proximal tibia were determined by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA). Measurements just distal to the subchondral plates of the tibia condyles, where the bone structure is predominantly trabecular, proved to give the most consistent results. The precision of BMC measurements in this region, expressed as the coefficient of variation, was 1.1 per cent and of BMD measurements 2.5 per cent. In a cross-sectional study on 63 normal women and men, BMC and BMD showed a decrease with age at a rate of about 8 and 9 per cent per decade, respectively, in women, but not in men. In normal women, BMC of proximal tibia was correlated with BMC of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral shaft, as well as with body weight and height. DPA may be useful in the study of bone reactions, such as in patients undergoing arthroplasty of the knee.     

Bone densitometry of the forearm: Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Forearm bone mineral densitometry was performed initially by single-photon absorptiometry (SPA), but is now achievable by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well, with a good correlation between both measurements. However, it is still unknown whether: (1) short-term precision of DXA is superior to SPA and (2) identical regions of interest (ROT) are mandatory to correlate SPA with DXA. The aim of this study was to answer these questions using a commercial system for DXA (DXA-FAS) and to test an in-house system using spine DXA and a soft-tissue compensator (DXA-STC). In ten subjects, four measurements on the same day showed significantly lower (p < 0.05) coefficients of variation (CV) for bone mineral density (BMD) by DXA-FAS (proximal site: 0.74%; ultradistal site: 1.20%) than by SPA (1.26% and 2.25%). However, the CV for bone mineral content (BMC) were similar for DXA-FAS (0.73% and 1.58%) and SPA (0.79% and 1.34%). The significant difference (p < 0.05) for surface calculation by DXA-FAS (1.24% and 0.93%) compared with SPA (2.36% and 1.28%) explains all the advantages of DXA-FAS for short-term precision. The measurements taken on the same day on the ulna and the radius or on the radius alone by SPA, DXA-FAS, and DXA-STC on 108 subjects aged 18–80 years were highly correlated [r ranging from 0.925 to 0.995 (p < 0.0001) and standard error of the estimate from 3.15% to 8.89%]. The need for a manual adjustment of the ROT was found to be mandatory for BMC but not BMD assessment. The use of DXA-STC is a fast method for forearm bone densitometry and its correlation with SPA is very high. However, its short-term precision for BMC (3.00% and 1.54%), BMD (2.15% and 1.12%), and surfaces (1.99% and 1.12%) is significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of DXA-FAS. We conclude that short-term precision of DXA is better than that of SPA only for BMD and surface measurement but not for BMC. ROT should be adjusted manually for the assessment of BMC but not for that of BMD.     

Correlation between densitometric and hystomorphometric values in isolated vertebrae of Sprague-Dawley rats

Summary The study of bone mass in experimental animals usually requires invasive techniques. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) may be an alternative as a non-invasive method (1). Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of 62 vertebrae of Sprague Dawley rats (SDr) measured by DEXA densitometry were compared with histomorphometric bone volume measurements, and a statistically significant correlation was found (r=0.79 and 0.75, respectively, p<0.001). In conclusion, DEXA is an accurate and feasible technique for the study of trabecular bone mass in SDr.     

Cortical and Trabecular Bone at the Forearm Show Different Adaptation Patterns in Response to Tennis Playing

Bone responds to impact-loading activity by increasing its size and/or density. The aim of this study was to compare the magnitude and modality of the bone response between cortical and trabecular bone in the forearms of tennis players. Bone area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the ulna and radius were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 57 players (24.5 +/- 5.7 yr old), at three sites: the ultradistal region (50% trabecular bone), the mid-distal regions, and third-distal (mainly cortical bone). At the ultradistal radius, the side-to-side difference in BMD was larger than in bone area (8.4 +/- 5.2% and 4.9 +/- 4.0%, respectively, p < 0.01). In the cortical sites, the asymmetry was lower (p < 0.01) in BMD than in bone area (mid-distal radius: 4.0 +/- 4.3% vs 11.7 +/- 6.8%; third-distal radius: 5.0 +/- 4.8% vs 8.4 +/- 6.2%). The asymmetry in bone area explained 33% of the variance of the asymmetry in BMC at the ultradistal radius, 66% at the mid-distal radius, and 53% at the third-distal radius. The ulna displayed similar results. Cortical and trabecular bone seem to respond differently to mechanical loading. The first one mainly increases its size, whereas the second one preferentially increases its density.     

Mineral content of upper tibia assessed by dual photon densitometry

Bone mineral content (BMC, g/cm) and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm²) of the proximal tibia were determined by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA). Measurements just distal to the subchondral plates of the tibia condyles, where the bone structure is predominantly trabecular, proved to give the most consistent results. The precision of BMC measurements in this region, expressed as the coefficient of variation, was 1.1 per cent and of BMD measurements 2.5 per cent.

In a cross-sectional study on 63 normal women and men, BMC and BMD showed a decrease with age at a rate of about 8 and 9 per cent per decade, respectively, in women, but not in men. In normal women, BMC of proximal tibia was correlated with BMC of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral shaft, as well as with body weight and height. DPA may be useful in the study of bone reactions, such as in patients undergoing arthroplasty of the knee.     

Factors influencing short-term precision of dual X-ray bone absorptiometry (DXA) of spine and femur

In this study we analyzed the effect of variations in bone area size, baseline soft tissue composition represented by the R-value, and bone region of interest positioning on the precision in vivo of bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The posterior-anterior (PA) spine, decubitus latcral, and femur modes were evaluated. Eleven (PA-spine), 9 (dec-lat), and 14 (femur) postmenopausal women were scanned twice on a Norland XR-26 with repositioning to determine short-term precision of BMD, BMC, AREA, and the R-value. Phantom precisions (CV[%] of 10 consecutive scans) for BMD (BMC) were PA spine: 0.66% (0.57%), neck: 1.1% (1.2%), and trochanter: 0.55% (1.0%). Precisions in vivo (CV[%]; two consecutive scans averaged over all patients) were PA spine: 0.9% (1.0%), dec-lat: 7.1% (18%), neck: 1.3% (1.9%), and trochanter: 2.5% (4.9%). BMD precision could be fully explained by BMC and AREA variations. However, BMC alone was a particularly poor predictor of BMD in the dec-lat (r²=0.05) and in the neck (r²=0.13) modes. AREA was a strong predictor for BMC precision explaining between 41% and 88% of the BMC changes. Changes in soft tissue composition contributed significantly in explaining the BMC changes in the dec-lat projection. A higher dependence of BMC changes on AREA changes resulted in a larger difference between BMC and BMD precision. Thus, particularly in the femur and in the decubitus lateral modes, the use of BMD is advantageous compared with BMC.