The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of biphasic defibrillation waveforms and conventional monophasic defibrillation waveforms on the success of initial defibrillation, postresuscitation myocardial function and duration of survival after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: We have recently demonstrated that the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction was closely related to the magnitude of the electrical energy of the delivered defibrillation shock. In the present study, the effects of fixed 150-J low-energy biphasic waveform shocks were compared with conventional monophasic waveform shocks after prolonged VF. METHODS: Twenty anesthetized, mechanically ventilated domestic pigs were investigated. VF was induced with an AC current delivered to the right ventricular endocardium. After either 4 or 7 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF), the animals were randomized for attempted defibrillation with up to three 150-J biphasic waveform shocks or conventional sequence of 200-, 300- or 360-J monophasic waveform shocks. If VF was not reversed, a 1-min interval of precordial compression preceded a second sequence of up to three shocks. The protocol was repeated until spontaneous circulation was restored or for a total of 15 min. RESULTS: Monophasic waveform defibrillation after 4 or 7 min of untreated VF resuscitated eight of 10 pigs. All 10 pigs treated with biphasic waveform defibrillation were successfully resuscitated. Transesophageal echo-Doppler, arterial pressure and heart rate measurements demonstrated significantly less impairment of cardiovascular function after biphasic defibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-energy biphasic waveform shocks were as effective as conventional higher energy monophasic waveform shocks for restoration of spontaneous circulation after 4 and 7 min of untreated VF. Significantly better postresuscitation myocardial function was observed after biphasic waveform defibrillation.     

Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities. METHODS: Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation. RESULTS: The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.     

The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of biphasic truncated exponential waveform design on survival and post-resuscitation myocardial function after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: Biphasic waveforms are more effective than monophasic waveforms for successful defibrillation, but optimization of energy and current levels to minimize post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction has been largely unexplored. We examined a low-capacitance waveform typical of low-energy application (low-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEL]; 100 microF, < or =200 J) and a high-capacitance waveform typical of high-energy application (high-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEH]; 200 microF, > or =200 J). METHODS: Four groups of anesthetized 40- to 45-kg pigs were investigated. After 7 min of electrically induced VF, a 15-min resuscitation attempt was made using sequences of up to three defibrillation shocks followed by 1 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Animals were randomized to BTEL at 150 J or 200 J or to BTEH at 200 J or 360 J. RESULTS: Resuscitation was unsuccessful in three of the five animals treated with BTEH at 200 J. All other attempts were successful. Significant therapy effects were observed for survival (p = 0.035), left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), stroke volume (p < 0.001), fractional area change (p < 0.001), cardiac output (p = 0.044), and mean aortic pressure (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic outcomes were negatively associated with energy and average current but positively associated with peak current. Peak current was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum survival and minimum myocardial dysfunction were observed with the low-capacitance 150-J waveform, which delivered higher peak current while minimizing energy and average current.     

Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. ZOLL Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform, consisting of a constant current first phase, with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform during transthoracic defibrillation. BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown that for endocardial defibrillation, biphasic waveforms have a greater efficacy than monophasic waveforms. More recently, a 130-J truncated exponential biphasic waveform was shown to have equivalent efficacy to a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. However, the optimal type of biphasic waveform is unknown. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, 184 patients who underwent ventricular defibrillation were randomized to receive a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic or 120-J rectilinear biphasic shock. RESULTS: First-shock efficacy of the biphasic waveform was significantly greater than that of the monophasic waveform (99% vs. 93%, p = 0.05) and was achieved with nearly 60% less delivered current (14 +/- 1 vs. 33 +/- 7 A, p < 0.0001). Although the efficacy of the biphasic and monophasic waveforms was comparable in patients with an impedance < 70 ohms (100% [biphasic] vs. 95% [monophasic], p = NS), the biphasic waveform was significantly more effective in patients with an impedance > or = 70 ohms (99% [biphasic] vs. 86% [monophasic], p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a superior efficacy of rectilinear biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation, particularly in patients with a high transthoracic impedance. More important, biphasic shocks defibrillated with nearly 60% less current. The combination of increased efficacy and decreased current requirements suggests that biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks are advantageous for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation.     

The Effects of Ventricular Fibrillation Duration and a Preceding Unsuccessful Shock on the Probability of Defibrillation Success Using Biphasic Waveforms in Pigs

Influence of VF Duration on Defibrillation Efficacy. introduction: While the defibrillation threshold has been reported to increase with ventricular fibrillation (VF) duration for monophasic waveforms, the effect of VF duration for biphasic waveforms is unknown. Methods and Results: The ED 50 requirements (the 50% probability of defibrillation success) for an endocardial lead system, which included a subcutaneous array, were determined by logistic regression using a recursive up-down algorithm for a biphasic waveform ((6/6 msec). The study was performed in two parts, each with eight pigs. In part 1, ED 50 was compared for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF and for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF following a failed first shock at 10 seconds. Energy at ED 50 decreased from 6.5 ± 0.9, J for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF to 4.9 ± 0.8, J (P < 0.01) for shocks delivered after 20 seconds. To determine if improved second shock efficacy was a result of preconditioning by the failed first shock or a function of VF duration, part 2 of the study compared defibrillation efficacy between shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF with shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF with and without a failed first shock at 10 seconds. Mean energy at ED 50 decreased from 10.1 ± 2.4, J for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF to 7.9 ± 2.4 J (P < 0.01) and 7.5 ± 3.2 J (P < 0.01) for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF with and without a failed first shock, respectively. The mean energy at KD 50 for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VK with and without a failed first shock was not significantly different (P = 0.53). A strong linear correlation for energy at ED 50 was found between shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF and shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF following a failed first shock (r = 0.95, P < 0.01). Conclusion: (1) As opposed to monophasic shocks, ED 50 is significantly lower for biphasic shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF compared with shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF in pigs. (2) An unsuccessful biphasic shock in pigs does not affect the defibrillation efficacy for a subsequent shock. (3) ED 50 for a biphasic shock delivered after 20 seconds of VK is linearly related to ED 50 for a shock delivered after 10 seconds of VK.     

双相电震致心律失常性的降低及其与高效除颤的关系

双相电震比单相电震除颤更有效，但其机制未明。除颤的易损性上限（ＵＬＶ）假说认为一个无效电震是由于它再次诱发了心室颤动（ＶＦ），因此研究ＶＦ诱发的机制可能有助于理解除颤的机制。单、双相电震以电震强度（ＳＳ）与偶联间期（ＣＩ）及波形随机结合的方式施加于Ｌａｎｇｅｎｄｏｒｆ灌流的兔离体心脏上，比较心脏对单、双相电震的ＶＦ易损性。结果心脏对双相电震的反应有如下几点不同于其对单相电震的反应：①易损区（ＡＯＶ）小（８．９±４．２个区域单位ｖｓ１３．９±６．０个区域单位，Ｐ＜０．０５）。②易损区与非心律失常反应区之间的过渡区窄（１４．７±４．８个区域单位ｖｓ２９．９±６．４个区域单位，Ｐ＜０．００１）。③双相电震将整个ＡＯＶ向更长的ＣＩ移动（左边界右移了１１．０±８．８ｍｓ，右边界右移了６．０±５．２ｍｓ，Ｐ均＜０．０１）。这种双相电震致心律失常性的降低可有助进一步解释双相电震除颤阈值降低的现象。     

Early Out-of-Hospital Experience with an Impedance-Compensating Low-Energy Biphasic Waveform Automatic External Defibrillator

Impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic truncated exponential(BTE) waveforms are effective in transthoracic defibrillation ofshort-duration ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, the BTE waveform hasnot been examined in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with patients inprolonged VF often associated with myocardial ischemia. The objective ofthis study was to evaluate the BTE waveform automatic externaldefibrillator (AED) in the out-of-hospital setting with long-duration VF.AEDs incorporating a 150-J BTE waveform were placed in 12 police squad carsand 4 paramedic-staffed advanced life support ambulances. AEDs were appliedto arrested patients by first-arriving personnel, whether police orparamedics. Data were obtained from PC Data Cards within the AED.Defibrillation was defined as at least transient termination of VF. Tenpatients, 64 ± 14 years, were treated for VF with BTE shocks.Another 8 patients were in nonshockable rhythms and the AEDs,appropriately, did not advise a shock. Five of the 10 VF arrests werewitnessed with a 911 call-to-shock time of 6.6 ± 1.7 minutes. VFdetection and defibrillation occurred in all 10 patients. Spontaneouscirculation was restored in 3 of 5 witnessed arrest patients and 1 survivedto discharge home. Fifty-one VF episodes were converted with 62 shocks. Presenting VF amplitude and rate were 0.43 ± 0.22 (0.13-0.86) mV and232 ± 62 (122-353) beats/min, respectively, and defibrillation wasachieved with the first shock in 7 of 10 patients. Including transientconversions, defibrillation occurred in 42 of 51 VF episodes (82%)with one BTE shock. Shock impedance was 85 ± 10 (39-138) ohms.Delivered energy and peak voltage were 152 ± 2 J and 1754 ±4 V, respectively. The average number of shocks per VF episode was 1.2± 0.5 (1-3). More than one shock was needed in only 9 episodes; nonerequired >3 shocks to defibrillate. Impedance-compensating low-energyBTE waveforms terminated VF in OHCA patients with a conversion rateexceeding that of higher energy monophasic waveforms. VF was terminated inall patients, including those with high impedance.     

Effect of Electrode Polarity on Internal Defibrillation with Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms Using an Endocardial Lead System

Defibrillation Electrode Polarity. introduction: To test the hypothesis that the effect of shock polarity on defibrillation depends on waveform duration, this study determined strength-duration defibrillation curves of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential waveforms for both polarities. Methods and Results: Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were obtained in 32 pigs for catheter electrodes in the right ventricle (RV) and superior vena cava (SVC) using a modified Purdue technique. Both electrode polarities were tested in five different protocols. In part 1, DFTs were determined with 1- to 14-msec monophasic waveforms. In parts 2, 3, and 4, DFTs were determined with two different sizes of SVC electrodes for biphasic waveforms with a phase 1 of 4 or 6 msec and a phase 2 ranging from 1 to 10 msec. In part 5, DFTs were tested for monophasic waveforms ranging from 2 to 11 msec and for biphasic waveforms with a phase 1 duration corresponding to each monophasic waveform and a phase 2 held constant at 1 msec. Mean DFTs for monophasic waveforms were significantly lower when the RV electrode was an anode than when it was a cathode for waveform durations ≥ 3 msec. For biphasic waveforms in which phase 2 was ≤ phase 1 in duration, no significant difference in mean DFT was observed when polarity was reversed. Even a phase 2 as short as 1 msec could eliminate the DFT difference between polarities observed with monophasic shocks. When phase 2 was ≥ 2 msec longer than phase 1, polarity did affect the DFT of biphasic waveforms: it affected the DFT similarly to a monophasic waveform of the same polarity as phase 2. Phase 1 duration and electrode size also affected the difference in DFT produced by changing the electrode polarity. Conclusions: For phase durations most commonly used clinically because of their low DFTs. reversing polarity changed defibrillation efficacy for monophasic but not biphasic shocks. For inefficient biphasic waveforms with phase 2 ≥ 2 msec longer than phase 1, the DFT was lower when the RV electrode was an anode during phase 2, similar to the polarity difference for monopbasic waveforms, suggesting that a long second phase of biphasic waveforms defibrillates in a similar fashion to monophasic waveforms.     

Better outcome after pediatric defibrillation dosage than adult dosage in a swine model of pediatric ventricular fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare outcome after adult defibrillation dosing versus pediatric dosing in a piglet model of prolonged prehospital ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: Weight-based 2 to 4 J/kg monophasic defibrillation dosing is recommended for children in VF, but impractical for automated external defibrillator (AED) use. Present AEDs can only provide adult shock doses or newly developed attenuated adult doses intended for children. A single escalating energy sequence (50/75/86 J) of attenuated adult-dose biphasic shocks (pediatric dosing) is at least as effective as escalating monophasic weight-based dosing for prolonged VF in piglets, but this approach has not been compared to standard adult biphasic dosing. METHODS: Following 7 min of untreated VF, piglets weighing 13 to 26 kg (19 +/- 1 kg) received either biphasic 50/75/86 J (pediatric dose) or biphasic 200/300/360 J (adult dose) therapies during simulated prehospital life support. RESULTS: Return of spontaneous circulation was attained in 15 of 16 pediatric-dose piglets and 14 of 16 adult-dose piglets. Four hours postresuscitation, pediatric dosing resulted in fewer elevations of cardiac troponin T (0 of 12 piglets vs. 6 of 11 piglets, p = 0.005) and less depression of left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.05). Most importantly, more piglets survived to 24 h with good neurologic scores after pediatric shocks than adult shocks (13 of 16 piglets vs. 4 of 16 piglets, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, pediatric shocks resulted in superior outcome compared with adult shocks. These data suggest that adult defibrillation dosing may be harmful to pediatric patients with VF and support the use of attenuating electrodes with adult biphasic AEDs to defibrillate children.     

Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks

BACKGROUND: Biphasic rectilinear shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks for transthoracic atrial defibrillation and for ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiological testing.We undertook the present study to compare the efficacy of 100 J rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks with 150 J monophasic damped sine waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation of true ventricular fibrillation during defibrillation threshold testing (DFT).The second aim of the study was to analyse the influence of patch positions on the efficacy of defibrillation. METHODS: 50 episodes of 14 patients (age ranging from 37 to 82 years) who underwent DFT testing were randomised for back-up shocks with either a sequence of 100 and 200 J biphasic waveform, or a sequence of 150 and 360 J conventional monophasic shocks. A binary search protocol was used at implantation and before hospital discharge. Patients were also randomised to an anteroposterior position versus a right-anterior-apical position. A crossover was performed between implantation and pre-hospital discharge for biphasic versus monophasic sequence as well as for the 2 different positions. RESULTS: After failed internal shocks, 27 episodes were treated with biphasic, and 23 with monophasic shocks.The first attempt by the external device did not terminate II episodes (2 biphasic, 9 monophasic).The first shock efficacy was significantly greater with biphasic than with monophasic shocks (p < 0.02).The overall success rate was 93% with biphasic shocks and 64% with monophasic shocks. In multivariate regression analysis including patch position, arrhythmia duration, type of waveform, testing order and session, only waveform was associated with successful defibrillation (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: For transthoracic defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation, low-energy rectilinear biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks.The position of the defibrillation shock pads has no influence on the biphasic shock efficacy, but anteroposterior pad position is more effective using monophasic shocks.     

Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform

The standard implantable defibrillator waveform is a truncated exponential of approximately 6 msec duration. This study compares the defibrillation efficacy of a standard monophasic truncated exponential to a biphasic 12 msec truncated exponential waveform in 21 patients undergoing automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) surgery. For the biphasic waveform, the polarity was reversed and remaining capacitor voltage was attenuated by 75% after 6 msec. Two hundred thirty episodes of VF were induced with 115 "matched pairs" of monophasic and biphasic waveforms of identical initial capacitor voltages given over a range from 70 to 600 V (0.35 to 25.7 joules). The biphasic waveform was superior to the monophasic waveform (p less than 0.006), especially for "low energy" defibrillation. For initial voltages less than 200 V, the percent successful defibrillation was 28% for the monophasic waveform versus 64% for the biphasic waveform and from 200 to 290 V (energies less than 6.4 joules) it was 45% versus 69%. There was no difference in the two waveforms in time to the first QRS complex or in the blood pressure following defibrillation. This study shows that a 12 msec biphasic truncated exponential is superior to a 6 msec monophasic waveform for defibrillation in man, especially at energies less than 6.4 joules. The waveform can be achieved in an implanted device without any increase in capacitor size or in battery energy consumption.     

Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks,waveform rounding,and synchronized shock delivery

The aim of this study is to optimize the truncated exponential waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Discharge of a capacitor gives a fast-rising waveform with a spike; rounding of the waveform slows the rate of rise and removes the spike. Defibrillation thresholds for electrically induced VF were determined for rounded and conventional biphasic and triphasic waveforms (apex-anterior paddles; 130 microF capacitor; 3-10 ms phase duration), and for the Lown waveform in 29 anesthetized pigs. Rounding of the leading edge of the biphasic waveform reduced the threshold voltage and current for defibrillation at 3 + 3 ms and 6 + 6 ms phase duration, relative to the conventional unrounded biphasic or the Lown waveforms. The threshold delivered energy was lower for rounded truncated exponential biphasic shocks at 3 + 3 ms (55.3 +/- 2.5 J) than at 6 + 6 ms (67.6 +/- 2.9 J; reduction 15.9 +/- 3.8%; P <.001; n = 29) phase duration. Triphasic shocks (total duration 6-12 ms) showed no advantages over biphasic shocks in this model. The rounded waveform (6 + 6 ms phase duration) had a reduced delivered energy at threshold (9%) with transthoracic shock delivery synchronized to peak (71.1 +/- 4.2 J) or trough (71.5 +/- 4.9 J) of the high amplitude body surface electrocardiogram signal in ventricular fibrillation, compared with unsynchronized shocks (78.7 +/- 4.7 J; P <.05). In this study a biphasic, rounded waveform of total duration 6 or 12 ms, was optimal for the correction of electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation. Synchronization to the peak or trough of the high amplitude electrocardiogram signal gave a further reduction in the energy to defibrillate.     

Comparison of four clinically used external defibrillators for transesophageal defibrillation

Introduction

Defibrillation thresholds (DFT) are lower when using biphasic instead of monophasic shock waveforms. In addition, transesophageal defibrillation can decrease the defibrillation threshold compared to thransthoracic defibrillation due to a different shock vector. We compared the defibrillation thresholds of a monophasic and three biphasic defibrillators in transesophageal defibrillation.

Methods

Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced in 12 domestic pigs. Transesophageal defibrillation was performed between two cutaneous patch electrodes and one esophageal electrode. The lowest energy level with successful defibrillation was defined as the DFT. Using four commercially available defibrillators, DFTs were determined for monophasic, truncated exponential biphasic and rectilinear biphasic shock waveforms.

Results

DFTs for biphasic transesophageal shocks were significantly lower than for monophasic shocks, reducing DFT to about 50%. There was no significant difference between the three biphasic defibrillators with regard to DFT.

Conclusions

The choice of shock waveform can further decrease the already low DFT in transesophageal defibrillation. Similar to transthoracic defibrillation, biphasic shock waveforms yield lower DFTs in transesophageal defibrillation compared to monophasic shocks. The use of different biphasic waveforms does not seem to have a major effect on DFT in transesophageal defibrillation.     

Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads.

Bidirectional shocks using 2 current pathways have been used in endocardial lead systems for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, but the optimal shock waveform for endocardial defibrillation is unknown. The clinical efficacy and electrical characteristics of bidirectional monophasic and biphasic shocks for endocardial cardioversion-defibrillation of fast monomorphic or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF) were evaluated. Thirty-three patients (mean age 60 +/- 12 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 34 +/- 13%) were studied. Defibrillation catheter electrodes were located in the right ventricular apex and superior vena cava/right atrial junction. A triple-electrode configuration including the 2 catheter electrodes and a left thoracic patch was used to deliver bidirectional shocks from the right ventricular cathode to an atrial anode (pathway 1) and the thoracic patch (pathway 2). The shock waveforms examined were sequential and simultaneous monophasic, and simultaneous biphasic. The efficacy of 580 V (20 J) shocks for fast monomorphic VT were comparable for the 3 waveforms (73% for sequential monophasic, 73% for simultaneous monophasic, and 100% for simultaneous biphasic). However, for polymorphic VT and VF, 580 V sequential monophasic shocks had a significantly lower efficacy (25%) than did simultaneous monophasic (75%; p = 0.01) or biphasic (89%; p less than 0.001) shocks. Single-shock defibrillation thresholds with simultaneous biphasic shocks were significantly lower (9 +/- 5 J) than were those with simultaneous monophasic shocks (15 +/- 4 J; p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Improved safety factor for triphasic defibrillator waveforms

Newly developed biphasic waveforms improve defibrillation efficacy both by reduction of defibrillation threshold and by amelioration of shock-induced dysfunction depending on the relative shape of the first and second pulses. Each of these independent effects improves the waveform's safety factor, the ratio between the shock intensity that produces a specific degree of postshock dysfunction and the shock intensity that produces defibrillation (or cellular excitation). Symmetrical waveforms reduce defibrillation threshold to about 60% that of the corresponding monophasic waveform, probably by reduction of excitation threshold for ischemic cells, but increase postshock arrhythmias. Biphasic waveforms with 10% "tails" reduce postshock arrhythmias. This study tests the hypothesis that these independent mechanisms for improvement of defibrillation efficacy can be combined into a single triphasic waveform that will have a higher safety factor than either of the two biphasic waveforms of which it is composed. Cultured myocardial cells were subjected to high-intensity electric-field stimulation with a control monophasic rectangular waveform, a symmetrical biphasic waveform, and a triphasic waveform consisting of the biphasic waveform with an added 10% "tail." Each waveform portion was 5 msec in duration. Photocell mechanograms monitored contractile activity. We found that the duration of postshock arrest of spontaneous contractile activity increased with stimulus intensity for all waveforms. The voltage gradient producing a 4-second arrest after the biphasic waveform shock was 80.6 +/- 1.3% that of the control waveform (100%), while the voltage gradient for the triphasic waveforms was 87.1 +/- 0.73% of control. The difference between biphasic and triphasic waveforms was significant (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Increasing fibrillation duration enhances relative asymmetrical biphasic versus monophasic defibrillator waveform efficacy

Biphasic waveforms reduce defibrillation threshold compared with corresponding monophasic waveforms. However, effects of fibrillation duration on relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms are unknown. This study used a newly developed defibrillation model, the isolated right- and left-sided working rabbit heart, with epicardial defibrillation electrodes, to compare threshold for a monophasic waveform (5 msec rectangular) and an asymmetrical biphasic waveform (5 msec each pulse, V2 = 50% V1). Mean voltage defibrillation threshold (V50) was determined from sigmoidal probability of successful defibrillation versus shock intensity curves after 5, 15, and 30 seconds of fibrillation in a paired study with 10 hearts. Results showed that biphasic waveforms had significantly lower voltage and energy thresholds at all fibrillation durations and that their relative efficacy improved with increasing fibrillation duration. Biphasic voltage threshold was 38.2 +/- 2.2, 44.7 +/- 4.8, and 46.6 +/- 3.2 V after 5, 15, and 30 seconds of fibrillation compared with monophasic thresholds of 51.7 +/- 4.4 (p less than 0.002), 63.0 +/- 7.6 (p less than 0.05), and 72.1 +/- 3.9 V (p less than 0.005). Biphasic waveform energy threshold was 0.67 that for the monophasic waveform after 5 seconds of fibrillation (0.12 +/- 0.01 versus 0.18 +/- 0.03 J, p less than 0.05). The ratio between biphasic waveform threshold and monophasic waveform threshold (B/M) decreased to 0.62 at 15 seconds. At 30 seconds, B/M was 0.52 (0.17 +/- 0.02 versus 0.33 +/- 0.04 J, p less than 0.02). This study also showed that biphasic waveform threshold was a nonlinear function of monophasic waveform threshold so that improved biphasic defibrillator waveform efficacy was greatest for hearts having higher monophasic thresholds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Postresuscitation stunning: postfibrillatory myocardial dysfunction caused by reduced myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness after ventricular fibrillation-induced myocyte Ca2+ overload

INTRODUCTION: Resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF), particularly from prolonged VF, frequently is complicated by postfibrillatory myocardial dysfunction (postresuscitation stunning). We tested whether this dysfunction can be caused by reduced myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness after VF-induced myocyte Ca2+ overload. We also tested whether electrical defibrillation shocks contribute to this dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness was estimated as ratio of left ventricular developed pressure over myocyte Ca2+ transient amplitudes (assessed as indo-1 fluorescence) in isolated perfused rat hearts before, during, and after VF (1.5 or 10 min) comparing three modes of defibrillation (biphasic electrical shocks, lidocaine, or spontaneous). We found that, independent of these defibrillation modes, myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness was significantly reduced, particularly after prolonged VF, although hearts were not ischemic or acidotic during and after VF (unchanged coronary flow, myocardial oxygen consumption, and pH of the coronary effluent). This reduction was associated with VF-induced myocyte Ca2+ overload and increasing or decreasing Ca2+ overload during VF (using 1 microM diltiazem or 6 mM extracellular calcium) led to parallel changes of myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness. However, myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness was not associated with the defibrillation shock energy (range 0.1-15.0 J/g wet heart weight). CONCLUSION: Postfibrillatory myocardial dysfunction can be caused by reduced myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness after VF-induced myocyte Ca2+ overload. Electrical defibrillation shocks (up to 15 J/g wet heart weight), however, do not significantly contribute to this dysfunction. Our findings suggest that early additional therapy targeting intracellular Ca2+ overload may normalize myocyte Ca2+ and partially prevent postresuscitation stunning.     

alpha-Methylnorepinephrine, a selective alpha2-adrenergic agonist for cardiac resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a selective alpha2-adrenergic agonist, alpha-methylnorepinephrine (alphaMNE) as an alternative vasopressor agent during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). BACKGROUND: For more than 40 years, epinephrine has been the vasopressor agent of choice for CPR. Its beta- and alpha1-adrenergic effects increase myocardial oxygen consumption, magnify global myocardial ischemia and increase the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. METHODS: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 20 Sprague-Dawley rats. After 8 min of untreated VF, mechanical ventilation and precordial compression began. AlphaMNE, epinephrine or saline placebo was injected into the right atrium 2 min after the start of precordial compression. As an additional control, one group of animals was pretreated with alpha2-receptor blocker, yohimbine, before injection of alphaMNE. Defibrillation was attempted 4 min later. Left ventricular pressure, dP/dt40, negative dP/dt and cardiac index were measured for an interval of 240 min after resuscitation. RESULTS: Except for saline placebo and yohimbine-treated animals, comparable increases in coronary perfusion pressure were observed after each drug intervention. All animals were successfully resuscitated. Left ventricular diastolic pressure, cardiac index, dP/dt40 and negative dP/dt were more optimal after alphaMNE; this was associated with significantly better postresuscitation survival. Pretreatment with vohimbine abolished the beneficial effects of alphaMNE. CONCLUSIONS: The selective alpha2-adrenergic agonist, alphaMNE, was as effective as epinephrine for initial cardiac resuscitation but provided strikingly better postresuscitation myocardial function and survival.     

Precountershock cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves ventricular fibrillation median frequency and myocardial readiness for successful defibrillation from prolonged ventricular fibrillation: a randomized,controlled swine study

STUDY OBJECTIVE: After prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF), precountershock cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) will improve myocardial "readiness" for defibrillation compared with immediate defibrillation. METHODS: After 10 minutes of untreated VF, 32 swine (27+/-1 kg) were randomly assigned to receive immediate countershocks (DEFIB), CPR for 3 minutes followed by countershocks (CPR), or CPR for 3 minutes plus intravenous epinephrine followed by countershocks (CPR+EPI). VF waveform was evaluated by fast Fourier transformation. RESULTS: VF amplitude and median frequency by fast Fourier transformation decreased during the untreated VF interval in all groups, and the median frequency subsequently increased during each minute of precountershock CPR. Although the VF median frequency in the 3 groups did not differ after 10 minutes of untreated VF (8.9+/-0.8 Hz versus 8.4+/-0.5 Hz versus 7.3+/-0.5 Hz, respectively), immediately before the first shock the VF median frequency was much lower in the DEFIB group than in either the CPR or CPR+EPI groups (8.9+/-0.8 Hz versus 13.1+/-0.8 Hz versus 13.8+/-0.9 Hz, respectively; P <.01). None of the 10 animals in the DEFIB group attained return of spontaneous circulation after the first set of shocks versus 5 of 10 animals in the CPR group and 6 of 12 animals in the CPR+EPI group (DEFIB versus each CPR group; P <.05). Cardiac output 1 hour after resuscitation was substantially worse in the DEFIB group than in the CPR or CPR+EPI groups (74+/-7 mL/kg per minute versus 119+/-7 mL/kg per minute versus 104+/-15 mL/kg per minute; P <.05). CONCLUSION: Precountershock CPR can result in substantial physiologic benefits compared with immediate defibrillation in the setting of prolonged VF. Moreover, these benefits can be attained with or without the addition of intravenous epinephrine.     

Comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveforms in epicardial atrial defibrillation

Objectives. Because biphasic waveforms have previously been shown to be more efficient than monophasic waveforms in defibrillation of the ventricle, we compared the efficiency of the two waveforms in defibrillation of the atria.Background. The development of an implantable atrial defibrillator would offer significant advantages over current approaches to the management of atrial fibrillation. Patient tolerance of atrial shocks from such a device, however, would depend critically on the deployment of an efficient waveform.Methods. Both the monophasic and biphasic shocks were of 8-ms duration, and the biphasic was a dual-capacitor waveform with equal first- and second-phase duration and leading-edge voltage. One hundred randomized atrial shocks were evaluated in 21 patients during cardiopulmonary bypass. Atrial fibrillation was induced by the application of alternating current. Atrial shocks were delivered through customized, contoured epicardial paddles applied to the posterior left atrial wall (surface area 11 cm²) and to the anterior right atrial wall (surface area 26 cm²).Results. For the monophasic waveform the delivered energy (joules) associated with 50% success (E₅₀) was 1.44 J (95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 11.2) and with 80% (E₈₀) success 3.9 J (95% CI 2.42 to 109.8); for the biphasic waveform 50% success was achieved with 0.37 J (95% CI 0.36 to 0.38) (p = NS) and 80% success with 0.57 J (95% CI 0.56 to 0.58) (p < 0.05).Conclusions. A biphasic waveform is more efficient than a monophasic waveform in atrial defibrillation. This may have implications for the development of an implantable atrial defibrillator for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in addition to improvement of elective transthoracic and endocardial cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation.