Maryland Adults'' Knowledge of Oral Cancer and Having Oral Cancer Examinations

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine (1) knowledge of risk factors for oral cancer, (2) knowledge of signs and symptoms of oral cancers, and (3) factors associated with having had an oral cancer examination among 916 Maryland adults 18 years of age and older. METHODS: A statewide, random-digit dial, computer-assisted telephone survey was conducted. The pretested instrument consisted of 32 questions that required 12 minutes to complete. RESULTS: Overall, level of knowledge about risk factors for and signs and symptoms of oral cancers was low; misinformation was high. Although 85 percent reported hearing about oral or mouth cancer, only 28 percent of the respondents reported having had an oral cancer examination. Of these, 20 percent had the exam during the past year--the recommended frequency for persons 40 years of age or older. In logistic regression analysis, adults more likely to have had an oral cancer examination included those who thought personal behavior causes more cancer than environmental factors; had more knowledge about risk factors for oral cancer; and were 40-64 years of age, white, and better educated than their counterparts (P < .05). The primary reasons for not having an exam were "no reason/didn't know I should" and "doctor/dentist didn't recommend." CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a need for interventions designed to increase knowledge levels of risk factors for, signs, and symptoms of oral cancers and the need for oral cancer examinations; and to increase oral cancer examinations.     

Factors Associated with Having Oral Cancer Examinations Among US Adults 40 Years of Age or Older

Objectives : This study describes factors associated with having an oral cancer examination among US aduits 40 years of age or older. Methods : Data used in this study are from the Cancer Control supplement of the 1992 National Health Interview Survey, which included questions about having had an oral cancer screening examination and knowledge of risk factors for oral cancers. The survey was administered to a national sample 18 years of age and older (n=12,035). Questions regarding beliefs and opinions about cancers in general also were asked and their associations with responses to having had an oral cancer examination studied. Analyses are limited to those respondents 40 years of age and older (n=6,538). Results : Fifteen percent of the adults reported having had an oral cancer examination. Of these, 48 percent had the exam during the past year and 31 percent had an exam one to three years ago. Respondents who were above the poverty level, white, non-Hispanic, 40 to 64 years of age, and who had more than a high school education and a higher level of knowledge about risk factors for oral cancer were more likely to have had an oral cancer examination. Conclusion : These findings demonstrate the need for vigorous health education and health promotion interventions aimed at health care providers and the public to increase knowledge about risk factors for oral cancers and to increase oral cancer examinations.     

Risk factors for oral cancer in newly diagnosed patients aged 45 years and younger: a case–control study in Southern England

BACKGROUND: This case-control study aimed to identify the risk factors for oral cancer in patients aged 45 years and under. METHODS: Patients were recruited over a 3-year period between 1999 and 2001 from 14 hospitals in the southeast of England, UK. RESULTS: Fifty-three (80%) newly diagnosed patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity participated. The mean age of cases at diagnosis was 38.5 years (SD = 7.0) and 53% were male. Patients were interviewed about main risk factors of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis and their consumption of fresh fruit and vegetables in the past. Ninety-one matched control patients were also recruited. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from adjusted conditional logistic analyses. Significantly elevated ORs were evidenced amongst males who had started to smoke under the age of 16 years (OR = 14.3; 95% CI: 1.1-178.8). A significant reduction in risk was also shown for ex-smokers (OR = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.5-0.8). Consumption of alcohol in excess of recommended amounts also produced an eightfold risk in males (OR = 8.1; 95% CI: 1.6-40.1) and over a fourfold risk of oral cancer from the consumption of excessive amounts of alcohol and having ever smoked (OR = 4.4; 95% CI: 1.1-17.7). CONCLUSION: The study shows that the traditional behavioural risk factors are present in younger people diagnosed with oral cancer. The relatively short duration of exposure and the substantial number of cases without any known risk factors, particularly amongst females, however, suggest that factors other than tobacco and alcohol may also be implicated in the development of oral cancer in a proportion of these younger patients.     

Racial and ethnic disparity in oral cancer awareness and examination: 2003 New york state BRFSS

OBJECTIVES: This study documents the level of oral cancer awareness and examination among New York State adults and evaluates the determinants of disparities in oral cancer detection. METHODS: The 2003 New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System gathered information on current awareness of oral cancer and receipt of oral cancer examination from 5,544 adults. To assess whether the racial/ethnic factor remains important for the awareness, receipt, and source of oral cancer examination after controlling for other socioeconomic and health care access variables, bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted using SAS and SUDAAN. RESULTS: Even though a majority of State adults (80.4 percent) had heard about oral cancer, about three-quarters of these adults (74.3 percent) had never heard about an oral cancer test or examination. Only 35 percent of the adults reportedly received an oral cancer examination in their lifetime. Adults with Hispanic origin were less likely to have heard about and received an oral cancer examination. Regarding the source of the examination, some 72 percent of the examinations were conducted by a dental professional; the remaining 28 percent were performed by a physician, nurse, or nurse practitioner. Non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely to have received an oral cancer examination from health care providers other than a dentist or dental hygienist. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the need to improve the oral cancer awareness and examination rate in New York State. Routine examination of the mouth by primary care providers as part of a physical examination would provide the best opportunity for improving the low oral cancer examination rates in minority populations.     

Dental patients' self-reports of xerostomia and associated risk factors

BackgroundMost studies regarding xerostomia focus on elderly people. Therefore, the authors conducted a study of dental patients 18 years or older to determine the prevalence of self-reported xerostomia and associated risk factors.MethodsThe authors sent a total of 2,200 questionnaires to four dental clinics to assess patients’ self-reported xerostomia. They also collected sociodemographic data and information regarding personal behavior. They used logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) to explore the relationship between self-reported xerostomia and risk factors that reasonably might be expected to be associated with self-reported xerostomia.ResultsThe overall prevalence of xerostomia in participants was 7 percent. Participants with burning-mouth sensations were associated with having higher odds of experiencing dry mouth (OR, 2.1; 95 percent CI, 0.9–5.2). Participants 51 years or older were significantly more likely to report having dry mouth than were younger participants (P < .04). The prevalence of self-reported xerostomia increased with increasing numbers of medications patients reported using.ConclusionThe authors found that medication use and age were highly significant risk factors for dental patients reporting xerostomia.Clinical ImplicationsClinicians should interview their patients carefully regarding their use of medications and provide proper oral health care to improve xerostomia resulting from medication use.     

Florida adults' oral cancer knowledge and examination experiences

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed awareness of oral cancer, knowledge of its major risk factors and clinical signs, and oral cancer examination experiences among Florida adults aged 40 years and older. METHODS: A statewide random digit dial, computer assisted telephone survey was conducted in 2002. Data from 1,773 respondents were weighted to permit statewide estimates. Bivariate analyses were used to examine awareness and knowledge of oral cancer. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to model past-year oral cancer examination experiences of Florida's adults. RESULTS: In Florida, 15.5% of adults aged 40 years and older had never heard of oral cancer and another 40.3% reportedly knew little or nothing about it. About one-half of adults did not think oral white or red patches or bleeding could indicate oral cancer and 27.6% correctly identified three of oral cancer's major risk factors. After hearing an oral cancer exam described, just 19.5% of adults reported receiving one within the preceding 12 months. Blacks and Hispanics were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic whites to have received a recent oral cancer examination. Persons with low levels of education, those who lacked a regular dentist or source of preventive medical care, and adults who knew few or none of the clinical signs of oral cancer also were less likely to have received a recent oral cancer exam. CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread lack of awareness and knowledge in Florida regarding oral cancer and low levels of reported examination, particularly among groups experiencing disproportionately high incidence and late stage diagnosis. Increasing awareness of this disease and promoting primary and secondary prevention may help lessen the disease burden in Florida and reduce racial disparities in its outcomes.     

Determinants of dental referral practices among WIC nutritionists in North Carolina

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of knowledge and confidence on dental referral practices among WIC nutritionists in North Carolina. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 118 Likert scale-type questions was administered to 92% of all WIC nutritionists in North Carolina (n = 324). The relationship of knowledge and confidence with frequent dental referrals was tested using logistic regression. RESULTS: Regression results found that confidence in performing oral health risk assessments (OR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.13, 3.96), confidence in making dental referrals (OR = 3.02; 95% CI = 1.45-6.29), and confidence in expected outcomes that parents would seek dental care when advised to do so (OR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.62, 5.97) were associated with more frequent dental referrals. CONCLUSIONS: The more confident WIC nutritionists feel about oral health, the more likely they are to make dental referrals. Screening and referral by WIC workers may benefit children by improving access to dental care, as the WIC clinic is frequently the first point of contact with a health professional.     

Oral functional limitation among dentate adults

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence of oral functional limitation in adults and to identify clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with that limitation. METHODS: The Florida Dental Care Study is a longitudinal study of risk factors for changes in oral health. Subjects (n = 873) with at least one tooth who were 45 years old or older participated in a baseline in-person interview and dental examination. Subjects were queried about oral functional limitations. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of subjects reported difficulty chewing one or more foods using a five-item chewing index, and 10 percent reported difficulty speaking or pronouncing words because of problems with the mouth. The covariates in a multiple logistic regression identified as being significantly associated with chewing difficulty were fewer pairs of occluding anterior teeth, fewer pairs of occluding posterior teeth, more posterior teeth that are root tips, more anterior teeth that are mobile, reporting tooth pain, reporting bad breath, having but not wearing prosthetic appliances, reporting dry mouth, and being female. Having fewer anterior teeth, reporting a sore and/or broken denture, reporting unattractive teeth, and being black were significantly associated with speaking difficulty/difficulty pronouncing words because of problems with the teeth, mouth, or dentures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study suggest a significant prevalence of oral functional limitation in dentate adults. Certain clinical and sociodemographic factors were strongly and independently associated with its presence.     

Oral cancer knowledge and opinions among Maryland nurse practitioners

OBJECTIVES: As part of a Maryland statewide oral cancer needs assessment, a census of adult and family practice nurse practitioners was conducted to determine their knowledge of oral cancer risk factors, diagnostic procedures and related opinions. METHODS: Information was obtained through a pretested, 40-item, self-administered mail questionnaire of 389 nurse practitioners. A second complete mailing was sent three weeks after the initial mailing; two postal card reminders were mailed at 10 and 17 days after the second mailing, which yielded a response rate of 56 percent. RESULTS: Most nurse practitioners identified the use of tobacco, alcohol, and prior oral cancer lesions as real risk factors. But only 35 percent identified exposure to the sun as a risk for lip cancer. Respondents were not overly knowledgeable about the early signs of oral cancer, most common forms, or sites for oral cancer. Only 19 percent believed their knowledge of oral cancer was current. Nurse practitioners who reported having a continuing education course on oral cancer within the past two to five years were 3.1 times more likely to have a high score on knowledge of risk factors and 2.9 times more likely to have a high score on knowledge of both risk factors and of diagnostic procedures than were those who had never had a continuing education course. CONCLUSIONS: The reported knowledge of oral cancer, in conjunction with opinions about level of knowledge and training, point to a need for systematic educational updates in oral cancer prevention and early detection.     

Risk indicators for recurrent aphthous ulcers among adults in the US

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) in the oral cavity are painful, causing substantial morbidity in the US and elsewhere in the world. Despite this, there is a lack of population-based studies representative of the US national adult population to describe the epidemiology, and estimate the true disease burden and association with independent risk factors. Although several studies have investigated the role of various factors in RAU etiology, the epidemiology and etiology of RAU remain unclear. This study aims to establish the prevalence and describe the epidemiology of RAU in adults. METHODS: Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) were analyzed in SUDAAN using multivariable logistic regression, modeling RAU occurrences. RESULTS: Overall, for all Americans regardless of age, prevalence of RAU was 1030 per 100,000 people (95% CI 830-1220). The prevalence of RAU among adults was 850 per 100,000 (95% CI 630-1070). The lower vestibule was the most commonly involved site. Multivariable analyses suggested that adjusted odds of RAU were greatest for those 17-29 years of age (adjusted OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.4-5.5), for men (adjusted OR 1.7; 95% CI 0.9-2.8), and for those with low serum insulin levels (OR 2.0; 95% CI 0.9-4.4). Never smokers had greater risk of RAU (OR 9.2, 95% CI 2.8-30.1) compared with those who smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day. CONCLUSION: This study establishes the prevalence of RAU among adults in the US and demonstrates that whereas cigarette smoking is associated with lesser odds, low insulin levels might be independently associated with greater odds of RAU.     

Oral cancer educational materials for the general public: 1998

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown that US adults are not well informed about oral cancers and only 15 percent ever have had an oral cancer examination. This study sought to determine the quantity and adequacy of educational materials designed to inform or educate US adults about risks for, and signs and symptoms of, oral cancer and the need for an oral cancer examination. METHODS: Letters requesting copies of oral cancer educational materials produced by the organization or agency--leaflets, fact sheets, pamphlets, videos, posters--were sent to 172 national and state organizations or agencies. To determine the adequacy of the items, a previously developed, tested, and used form based on current science was adapted for this study. In addition, the SMOG index was used to determine readability for printed items. RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent or 132 of the selected organizations responded to queries. A total of 59 items were received that focused on or included the topic of oral cancer. Twenty of these 59 items focused specifically on oral cancer; the balance, on other topics, but mentioned oral cancer. The readability ranged from sixth to 13th grade. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a dearth of educational materials about oral and pharyngeal cancers; most are written at too high a grade level for the general public. These findings may help to explain why the public is so uninformed about these neoplasms.     

Opinions and attitudes of the UK's GDPs and specialists in oral surgery, oral medicine and surgical dentistry on oral cancer screening

OBJECTIVE: To survey two broad areas of oral cancer awareness and management of patients at risk of oral cancer by specialists in oral surgery, oral medicine, surgical dentistry and general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the UK. The first of these included knowledge and awareness of aetiological factors, changing patterns of disease, and screening/detection programmes including their effectiveness. The second included oral cancer detection methods, advice on avoidance of high-risk activity and self-examination, and referral pattern of GDPs. DESIGN AND METHOD: A pretested, 44-item questionnaire, a covering letter, a brief outline of the research protocol and return, stamped envelope were mailed in March 2003. A sample of 200 GDPs whose names were obtained from the General Dental Council's main list and 305 dental specialist names obtained from specialist's list in surgical dentistry, oral medicine and oral surgery were selected randomly. Information on oral cancer awareness and practice, screening practice and education was obtained. RESULTS: The response rate was 66.9%. The knowledge of the dental specialists was consistent with that in reports of current aetiological studies on oral cancer. However there were gaps in the GDP's knowledge and ascertainment of oral cancer risk factors. Over 70% of the dental specialists provided counselling advice on the risks of tobacco and alcohol habits compared with 41.2% of GDPs. More GDPs (52.4%) than specialists (35.4%) believed that oral cancer screening on a national basis would be effective in decreasing the mortality of oral cancer. Over 95% of all respondents used a visual examination for oral cancer screening and 89.9% of all respondents strongly believed that visual screening is effective in the early detection of oral cancer. CONCLUSION: The results showed that GDPs had knowledge gaps in their awareness of oral cancer risk factors and the application of preventive measures. Most dental health providers in the UK perform visual screening of the oral mucosa for their patients. Opinion was equivocal as to whether a nationally based screening programme similar to cervical cancer would be effective in improving the mortality and morbidity of oral cancer.     

Perceived Need for Dental Care Among Dentate Older Individuals in Sri Lanka

The authors assessed the perceived need for dental care among 585 older individuals, of whom 235 received a clinical oral examination. Of the 235 participants, only 171 were dentate. The present analysis is limited to this group. Of these 171 dentate adults, 43 percent perceived a need for dental care. Of this sample section, 53 percent perceived a need for dentures. Age, perceived oral health status, presence of mobile teeth, three impact items of the Oral Health Impact Profile‐14 (OHIP‐14) scale—namely “had a painful aching in the mouth, had difficulty in eating and that the diet had been unsatisfactory due problems with teeth, mouth or dentures”–and the total OHIP‐14 score showed significant associations with perceived need for dental care in bi‐vartate analysis. Poor perceived oral health status emerged as the strongest predictor of perceived need for dental care in logistic regression.     

Risk factors for impaired oral health among 18‐ to 34‐year‐old Australians

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for a summary measure of oral health impairment among 18‐ to 34‐year‐olds in Australia. Methods: Data were from Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health, a representative survey that utilized a three‐stage, stratified, clustered sampling design. Oral health impairment was defined as reported experience of toothache, poor dental appearance, or food avoidance in the last 12 months. Multivariate Poisson regression models were used to evaluate effects of sociodemographic characteristics, self‐perceived oral health, dental service utilization, and clinical oral disease indicators on oral health impairments. Effects were quantified as prevalence ratios (PR). Results: The estimated percent of 18‐ to 34‐year‐olds with oral health impairment was 42.4 [95 percent confidence interval (CI) 37.7‐47.2]. In the multivariate model, oral health impairment was associated with untreated dental decay (PR 1.38, 95 percent CI 1.13‐1.68) and presence of periodontal pockets 4 mm+ (PR 1.29, 95 percent CI 1.03‐1.61). In addition to those clinical indicators, greater prevalence of oral health impairment was associated with trouble paying a $100 dental bill (PR 1.37, 95 percent CI 1.12‐1.68), usually visiting a dentist because of a dental problem (PR 1.46, 95 percent CI 1.15‐1.86), reported cost barriers to dental care (PR 1.46, 95 percent CI 1.16‐1.85), and dental fear (PR 1.43, 95 percent CI 1.18‐1.73). Conclusions: Oral health impairment was highly prevalent in this population. The findings suggest that treatment of dental disease, reduction of financial barriers to dental care, and control of dental fear are needed to reduce oral health impairment among Australian young adults.     

德阳市成年人的口腔健康知识、态度及行为调查

目的　调查四川省德阳市城市、农村和城郊成年人的口腔健康知识、态度和行为,分析影响人群牙科卫生 服务使用的因素。方法　采用世界卫生组织基本口腔保健成年人问卷对1 010名德阳市城市、城郊和农村的35~ 44岁成年人进行面对面访谈,评价德阳市成年人的口腔健康知识、态度及行为,分析影响成年人2年内看牙医行为 的因素。结果　约半数成年人过去1年牙齿或口腔有疼痛,多数成年人的口腔健康态度较好,但对氟防龋的认识 不足。城市成年人使用含氟牙膏的比例(61·3%)明显高于城郊及农村(6·9%、16·8%)。从来没有看过牙医的比例 农村及城郊最高61·0%,71·5%,城市只有32·0%。Logistic回归分析表明,影响2年内看牙医行为的因素有地区类 别和上1年有无牙痛。有牙痛成年人看牙医的OR值是无牙痛成年人的2·84倍。结论　德阳市成年人对口腔健 康知识认识不足,态度较好,牙科卫生服务使用较低,口腔健康知识和行为亟待改进。     

Factors related to utilization of dental services during pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to investigate factors related to utilization of dental services during pregnancy and to assess the extent of mothers' knowledge regarding oral health during pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 625 women using a structured questionnaire mailed to mothers who had given birth in Johnson County, Iowa from August 2001 to March 2002. The survey assessed knowledge, behaviours, attitudes toward dental care during pregnancy, and personal, demographic and pregnancy-related factors. Variables which showed associations in bivariate analysis (p< or =0.1) were considered as candidates for building logistic regression models separately by domain (demographics, dental health care behaviours, lifestyle, financial variables, pregnancy-related variables, and knowledge of the possible association between oral health and pregnancy). Significant domain-specific regression results (p< or =0.05) were used to develop a final model using forward stepwise logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 69%. Dental visits during pregnancy were reported by 49% of respondents. Forty-three percent were aware of the possible connection between oral health and pregnancy outcomes. In the final logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with reporting dental visits during pregnancy were: (1) personal factors (being married, greater frequency of visiting the dentist when not pregnant and use of inter-proximal cleaning aids); (2) financial factors (dental insurance); and (3) knowledge of the possible connection between oral health and pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited knowledge of the possible relationships between oral health and pregnancy outcomes in a fairly homogeneous population of women who were of relatively high socioeconomic standing. This study suggests that better education of the importance of dental care before and during pregnancy is needed.     

Medical practitioners’ educational competence about oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Medical practitioners’ (MP) role is pivotal in primary prevention, early diagnosis, prompt referral and effective management of oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas (OC/OPC), which raises the importance of their effective OC/OPC education at all levels of medical education. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarise the available scientific evidence about their educational competence in dealing with OC/OPC. We made a systematic search of papers in the English language in MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library CENTRAL and CINAHL databases from their inception until December 2018. Overall, 23 cross-sectional and three interventional studies have been selected for the systematic review and 18 of these were included in the meta-analyses. Excluding tobacco use (synthesised estimate of 95% of respondents identified tobacco as an OC/OPC risk factor, 95% CI of synthesised estimate 92% to 97%) and alcohol consumption (65%, 95%CI 52% to 77%), less than half of MP (approximately) were knowledgeable about important OC/OPC risk factors including human papilloma virus (42%, 95% CI 30% to 54%), poor diet (34%, 95% CI 17% to 54%), and advancing age (45%, 95% CI 21% to 70%). There was a low to moderate level of awareness among MP regarding common precancerous oral lesions involving leukoplakia (56%, 95% CI 32% to 79%), erythroplakia (30%, 95% CI 8% to 58%), and oral lichen planus (13%, 95% CI 0 to 41%). Moderate knowledge was also recorded about frequent sites of OC development involving the tongue (48%, 95% CI 33% to 64%) and floor of the mouth (37%, 95% CI 19% to 57%). Most MP enquired about tobacco use (86%, 95% CI 74% to 96%), and alcohol consumption (73%, 95% CI 47% to 94%) during history taking, and expressed willingness to be given supplementary OC/OPC education (78%, 95% CI 54% to 96%), as well. With regard to the incidence of intraoral screening, 27% of MP (95% CI 12% to 46%) make an intraoral examination as a routine. Interestingly, studies from each continent yielded significantly different outcomes to some research questions in the review. From the MP’s perspective, clinical time restrictions and deficiencies in organised training were recognised as the main barriers towards their OC/OPC educational competence. The findings of this systematic review indicated the existence of deficiencies in knowledge and misconceptions, neglected preventive responsibilities, and associated barriers towards OC/OPC. A need for improved OC/OPC training at all levels of medical education is required to increase competence worldwide.     

Factors associated with utilization of care for oral lesions in HIV disease

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with utilization of care for oral lesions in people with HIV disease. STUDY DESIGN: The data were derived from 1424 adults who participated in a series of up to 4 interviews as part of the AIDS Cost and Service Utilization Survey. Treatment for thrush, oral sores, and other conditions was evaluated through use of logistic regression, with generalized estimating equations being applied. RESULTS: In all, 9.1% of those in the study sample reported being treated. After adjusting for CD4 cell count and other variables, regression analyses indicated that blacks (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.91) and Hispanics (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98) had significantly lower odds of reporting being treated. Respondents with more than a high school education (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.51), clinical trial participants (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.27-2.90), and those receiving counseling (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.60-3.09) were more likely to report being treated. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of care for oral lesions is very low. Educational and racial differences exist among those respondents who received care for HIV-associated oral lesions.     

Perceived need and use of oral health services among adolescents and adults in Tanzania

Abstract – The perceived need and use of oral health services among adolescents and adults in Tanzania were studied. One region from each of the country's five zones was chosen at random. Final sample selection ( n = 1061) was done in the main towns of the selected regions. Participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire which dealt with perceived need for dental treatment and use of oral health services and several demographic variables. Frequency tables were computed and analyzed. Odds ratios were calculated based on 2 × 2 tables and logistic regression models. The majority, 82% (95% CI: 79-85%) had sought treatment due to pain or for tooth extraction. Perceived need, dissatisfaction with own oral health status and use of oral health services were slightly more frequent among women. Bleeding gums had no explanatory value on the dependent variables. The strongest explanatory variable in a logistic regression model for perceived need and dissatisfaction with own oral health status was previous dental treatment with an estimated odds ratio of 6.4 (95% CI: 4.7-8.7) and 7.2 (95% CI: 5.3-9.9), respectively. People living nearest a treatment facility tended to use the services more [odds ratio 1.3 (95% CI: 0.8-2.1)]. A very strong relation between previous dental problems and use of oral health services was found, namely an odds ratio of 68.8 (95% CI: 39.0-121.4). The findings in the study may be useful in the attempts to implement Tanzania's National Plan for Oral Health.     

Awareness of mouth cancer in Great Britain

OBJECTIVE: There are more than 2,000 new cases of mouth cancer each year in Britain. Early detection is important yet little is known about population awareness of this disease and ability to recognise early signs, particularly among high risk groups. This study aimed to address this issue. METHODS: Data were collected by means of household survey. A total of 3,384 adults were questioned using a national probability sample. Respondents provided information on demographic characteristics, smoking status, and frequency of alcohol use. They were asked whether they had heard of mouth cancer. Their knowledge of early signs and risk factors was assessed. RESULTS: Whereas 95.6% of respondents said they had heard of mouth cancer, their awareness of early signs was low; for example, only 33.8% recognised that white patches in the mouth were a sign. The large majority understood that smoking and chewing tobacco were risk factors (84.7% and 80.1% respectively) but only 19.4% recognised alcohol use as a risk factor. In multiple logistic regression analyses controlling for relevant demographic factors, smokers and those with more frequent alcohol consumption were less likely to recognise early signs. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of early signs of mouth cancer is low and lower in people who as a result of their behaviour are at higher risk. There is a need to raise awareness in those at most risk.